Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1524586
This article is part of the Research Topic The Management of Fruit Rot Fungi in Commercial Vaccinium Species View all 9 articles

Fungicide resistance profiles of Alternaria spp. associated with fruit rot of blueberry in Georgia, USA

Provisionally accepted
  • The University of Georgia, Tifton Campus, Tifton, Georgia, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Georgia blueberry growers experience significant losses annually due to fruit rots including Alternaria rot caused by Alternaria spp. Fungicide applications from bloom through harvest are typically recommended for management of fruit rots, however fungicide resistance development has the potential to complicate management activities by reducing fungicide efficacy. To evaluate fungicide resistance issues in Georgia, 46 isolates of Alternaria spp. from ripe blueberry fruit from four major blueberry-producing counties were collected and identified by morphological and molecular features. The majority of the isolates were Alternaria alternata (n=43) but also included Alternaria tenuissima (n=1), Alternaria dumosa (n=1), and Alternaria limoniasperae (n=1). All isolates were assessed for resistance to fungicides which included fludioxonil, fluazinam, metconazole, cyprodinil, pydiflumetofen, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin. For all tested fungicides, with the exception of pyraclostrobin, a mycelial growth inhibition assay was used to determine the EC50 values. For pyraclostrobin, a spore germination assay was used. EC50 value ranges of A. alternata for fludioxonil, fluazinam, cyprodinil, metconazole, pydiflumetofen, boscalid, and pyraclostrobin were 0.037 to 0. µg/mL, 0.025 to 0.125 µg/mL, 0.015 to 0.404 µg/mL, 0.125 to 5.729 µg/mL, 0.008 to 1.114 µg/mL, 0.551 to >100 µg/mL, and 0.04 to >100 µg/mL, respectively. These EC50 values suggest that all tested Alternaria spp. isolates were sensitive to fludioxonil, fluazinam, metconazole, and cyprodinil. However, 12 Alternaria spp. isolates showed reduced sensitivity to pydiflumetofen, 21 were resistant to boscalid and 10 were resistant to pyraclostrobin. Among these resistant isolates, 6 were resistant to both of the two latter fungicides. Sequencing portions of the sdhB, sdhC and sdhD genes from boscalidresistant isolates and the cytochrome b gene from pyraclostrobin-resistant isolates revealed the presence of known resistance mutations in resistant isolates -including H134Q or G79R mutations in the sdhC gene or H134R mutations in the sdhD gene of some, but not all, boscalid-resistant isolates, and the presence of the G143A mutation in pyraclostrobin-resistant isolates. Our findings indicate that resistance to boscalid and pyraclostrobin is present in Alternaria spp. from Georgia blueberries and suggest that growers utilizing these fungicides in some Georgia locations may experience Alternaria fruit rot control failures.

    Keywords: Alternaria spp., Blueberry, Vaccinium spp., Fruit rot, fungicide resistance, Resistance

    Received: 07 Nov 2024; Accepted: 04 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Beg, Aktaruzzaman, Lewis and Oliver. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Jonathan E Oliver, The University of Georgia, Tifton Campus, Tifton, GA 31793, Georgia, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.