data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Crop and Product Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1521635
This article is part of the Research Topic Enhancing Agricultural Water Management: Techniques for Improving Crop Water Efficiency and Sustainability View all 11 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Polyethylene mulch film (PE) is a key agricultural practice for enhancing crop production and income in water-scarce regions. However, the complete recycling of PE remains challenging, resulting in the persistence of residual film fragments in the soil, which compromises soil structure and negatively impacts crop growth and yield potential. Although biodegradable mulch film (BEMF) is considered a promising alternative, the underlying mechanisms governing its regulation of soil water and thermal dynamics, as well as its subsequent impacts on crop productivity, are yet to be fully elucidated.Methods: Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of how BEMF influences soil water dynamics, thermal regimes, and crop growth and development is crucial for assessing its ecological adaptability. In this study field plot experiments were carried out over three consecutive growing seasons (2021 -2023) under three irrigation quotas: W1 (63.6% crop evapotranspiration [ETc], 315 mm), W2 (81.8% ETc, 405 mm), and W3 (100% ETc, 495 mm).Results: The findings revealed that PE left residual film fragments of 12.95 kg• ha -1 in the soil after mechanical recovery, while BEMF exhibited no such residue accumulation. However, BEMF reduced soil effective temperature by 100 -111°C and soil water content by 2.82 -9.42% compared to PE. These adverse effects under BEMF significantly impaired cotton net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and photosynthetic product accumulation. Specifically, BEMF decreased cotton net Pn by 8.42 -18.09%, photosynthetic product accumulation by 10.74 -26.41%, and yield by 651 -1079 kg• ha -1 relative to PE, particularly under the W1 irrigation level. Increasing the irrigation quota mitigated soil water and heat deficits, enhanced cotton net Pn and photosynthetic productivity, boosted yield by 1.76 -31.72%, and increased economic income by 552 -12,423 CNY• ha -1 .Discussion: This study provides a new ecological regional adaptation scheme for BEFM, highlighting that under conventional conditions, BEFM cannot fully substitute the yield advantages of PEFM. Nevertheless, the application of an additional 90 mm of irrigation water effectively mitigates the yield and economic losses associated with BEMF while eliminating the risk of residual film fragment accumulation in the soil. These findings offer valuable insights for advancing the green and sustainable management of agricultural ecosystems.
Keywords: Biodegradable mulch film1, Irrigation quota2, Accumulative soil temperature3, Soil water content4, Cotton yield5
Received: 02 Nov 2024; Accepted: 28 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Liu, Tang and Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Qiuxiang Tang, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Ürümqi, China
Tao Lin, Research Institute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, 830091, Xinjiang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.