![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Nutrition
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1518439
This article is part of the Research Topic Integrative Techniques to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Plants Using Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria and Fungi: Mechanisms, Interactions, and Applications View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Long-term monoculture of Lycium barbarum (L. barbarum) significantly affects its productivity and soil health. Soil microbiota, which mediate the sustainable development of soil ecosystems, are influenced by the age of wolfberry plants. However, the comprehensive effects of long-term cultivation of L. barbarum on the soil microbial community is not yet fully understood. Here, we assessed the effects of stand age on the diversity, composition, assembly, and symbiotic networks of bacterial and fungal communities in the root zone soil of L. barbarum using high-throughput sequencing technology. The results showed that stand age significantly affected the alpha diversity of bacterial and fungal communities, as evidenced by the tendency of their shannon and chao1 indices to increase and then decrease. At the same time, the structure of soil bacterial and fungal communities was significantly influenced by tree age. However, Proteobacteria (28.77%-32.81%) was the most dominant bacterial phylum, and Ascomycetes (49.72%-55.82%) was the most dominant fungal phylum. A number of genus-level biomarkers were also identified in soils associated with roots of trees of varying ages. Additionally, stochastic processes dominated the assembly of soil bacterial communities, whereas the balance between stochastic and deterministic processes in the assembly of fungal communities fluctuated with stand age. The complexity and stability of bacterial and fungal community networks were notably affected by tree age, particularly in networks from 10- and 15-year-old trees. The PLS-PM analysis emphasized that stand age can indirectly regulate the diversity and network complexity of both bacterial and fungal communities by influencing soil physicochemical properties. Furthermore, the bacterial community, but not the fungal community, exhibited direct and strong regulation of network complexity. The study offers valuable data for improving soil quality and fruit yield of L. barbarum under long-term continuous cropping, which has implications for the sustainable development of the L. barbarum industry.
Keywords: Lycium barbarum, Stand age, Soil microorganism, Ecological network, Assembly mechanisms
Received: 31 Oct 2024; Accepted: 10 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 He, Wang, Wang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Junhua Zhang, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.