Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1499432
This article is part of the Research Topic Plant Ecophysiology: Responses to Climate Changes and Stress Conditions View all 17 articles

Physiological and image-based phenotyping assessment of waterlogging responses of three kiwifruit rootstocks and grafting combinations

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environment Sciences (DAFE), University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy
  • 2 Agenzia Lucana di Sviluppo e di Innovazione in Agricoltura (ALSIA), Matera, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Kiwifruit species have a relatively high rate of root oxygen consumption, making them very vulnerable to low root zone oxygen concentrations resulting from soil waterlogging. Recently, kiwifruit rootstocks have been increasingly used to improve biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and crop performance under adverse conditions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate morpho-physiological changes in kiwifruit rootstocks and grafting combinations under short-term waterlogging stress. A pot trial was conducted at the Alsia Phenolab, part of the Phen-Italy infrastructures, using non-destructive RGB and NIR image-based analysis and physiological measurements to identify waterlogging stress indicators and more tolerant genotypes. Three pot-grown kiwifruit rootstocks ('Bounty 71', A. macrosperma -B; 'D1', A. chinensis var. deliciosa -D; 'Hayward', Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa -H) and grafting combinations, with a yellow-fleshed kiwifruit cultivar ('Zesy 002', A. chinensis var. chinensis) grafted on each rootstock (Z/B, Z/D, Z/H), were subjected to a control irrigation treatment (WW), restoring their daily water consumption, and to a 9-day waterlogging stress (WL), based on substrate saturation. Leaf gas exchange, photosynthetic activity, leaf temperature, RGB and NIR data were collected during waterlogging stress. Stomatal conductance and transpiration reached very low values (less than 0.05 mol m -2 s-1 and 1 mmol m-2 s-1 , respectively) in both waterlogged D and H rootstocks and their grafting combinations. In turn, leaf temperatures were significantly increased (up to 33 °C) and photosynthesis was reduced (1-6 μmol m -2 s -1 ) from the first days of waterlogging stress compared to B rootstock and combination. The B rootstock showed prolonged leaf gas exchange and photosynthetic activity, indicating that it can cope with short-term and temporary waterlogging and improve the tolerance of grafted kiwi vines, which showed a decrease in stomatal conductance five days after the onset of stress. Morphometric and colourimetric parameters from the image-based analysis confirmed the greater susceptibility of D and H rootstocks and their grafting combinations to waterlogging stress compared to B. The results presented confirm the role of physiological measurements and enhance that of RGB and NIR images in detecting the occurrence of water stress and identifying more tolerant genotypes in kiwifruit.

    Keywords: Scion-rootstock combinations, Water stress, Waterlogging tolerance, Leaf gas exchanges, Photosynthetic responses, affordable phenotyping, plant imaging, Kiwifruit

    Received: 20 Sep 2024; Accepted: 13 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Calabritto, Mininni, Di Biase, Petrozza, Summerer, Cellini and Dichio. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Alba N. Mininni, Department of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environment Sciences (DAFE), University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.