Skip to main content

METHODS article

Front. Plant Sci. , 28 March 2025

Sec. Plant Nutrition

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1460035

The Syringe Pump Gas Distribution (SPGD) system: a simple and low-cost method for simulating NH3/15NH3 deposition

Chunze Wu,Chunze Wu1,2Xing Wei,*Xing Wei1,2*Chenghang Zhang,Chenghang Zhang1,2Saima Khan,Saima Khan1,2
  • 1School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China

Ammonia (NH3) in the atmosphere plays a crucial role in the global nitrogen cycle. Elevated NH3 deposition can result in various detrimental ecological and environmental consequences. Traditionally, researchers have employed methods such as static fumigation, dynamic fumigation using high-precision mass flow meters or standard gas cylinders, and free air enrichment to investigate vegetation responses to NH3 deposition. However, these approaches may suffer from inaccuracies, high costs, or technical complexity. In order to address this issue, we developed the Syringe Pump Gas Distribution (SPGD) system, a cost-effective new method for simulating NH3/15NH3 deposition. This system allows for precise and stable mixing of NH3/15NH3 stored in a syringe with air using a microinjection pump. The resulting mixture is then utilized to simulate NH3/15NH3 deposition. With just one 20 ml syringe, a single SPGD system can simulate NH3 deposition flux ranging from 0 to 31.74 mg N m-2 d-1 (equivalent to 0 - 116 kg N ha-1 yr-1) over an area of 0.36 m2. The SPGD system demonstrated reliability and stability during a 21-day simulated deposition test on potted Populus cathayana under greenhouse conditions (including simulated rainfall). It exhibited adequate adjustment resolution to generate environments with varying NH3 concentrations, corresponding to different NH3 deposition fluxes. The test findings indicated a positive correlation between the δ15N levels in P. cathayana leaves and the NH3 deposition flux increase. The cost, complexity, and risk associated with simulating NH3 deposition can be significantly decreased by utilizing the SPGD system. The SPGD system is modular (gas supply unit and NH3 supply unit) and can be adapted to different research needs, including for simulating the deposition of NO2, SO2 or mixtures. Adopting this system, researchers can safely and efficiently simulate NH3 deposition or perform 15NH3 labeling, thereby advancing the understanding of physiological and ecological processes associated with plants and even forest ecosystems under gaseous deposition.

1 Introduction

Ammonia (NH3) is an important component of the global nitrogen cycle, which plays an important role in all ecosystems. Since the mid-20th century, emissions of NH3 to the atmosphere have continued to increase on a global scale due to increased intensive agricultural activities and animal feedlot operations (Warner et al., 2017; Li et al., 2016). The increased deposition resulting from these emissions has led to various detrimental environmental impacts, particularly affecting forest ecosystems. These impacts include eutrophication, acidification, and direct toxicity to ecosystems, raising concerns globally (Van der Eerden et al., 1992; Aber et al., 1998; Lu et al., 2014).

Atmospheric NH3 can be absorbed, assimilated and utilized by the leaves of higher plants, leading to changes in plant physiology and function. Since the 1980s, scientists have worked to understand the response of different vegetation to simulated atmospheric NH3 deposition. This involves creating environments with constant NH3 concentrations or specific NH3 supplies to evaluate the potential impact of projected increases in real atmospheric NH3 deposition on forest ecosystem structure and function. However, our understanding of vegetation responses to deposited NH3 remains limited, partly due to the scarcity of cost-effective, simple, and reliable methods for simulating NH3 deposition on a field or laboratory scale.

Supplying a certain amount of pure NH3 gas in a chamber can simulate NH3 deposition to some extent, but the simulation time is limited and the NH3 concentration is uncontrollable (Paoli et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2020). One approach to overcome these limitations is to continuously provide NH3 to greenhouses, indoor controlled environment chambers or open top field chambers (OTCs) using dynamic gas distribution methods (i.e., a continuous mixture of a source gas of known concentration and a purified diluent gas in a ratio to obtain a continuous rationed supply of a standard gas). However, the relative rate of supply of NH3 in dynamic gas distribution methods tends to be low due to the natural low NH3 concentrations in nitrogen deposition (Warner et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2020; Tanner et al., 2022), leading to complexity and increased costs. For example, in previous studies, people used configured standard gases with a low NH3 concentration as the NH3 source to expand the supply rate of NH3 (e.g., a cylinder containing with a calibrated gas mixture of 0.1% NH3 in N2) (Wu et al., 2023), increased the supply rate of the dilution gas to expand the supply rate of NH3 (Adrizal et al., 2006), or used high-precision NH3 mass flowmeters to meet the precise control of the NH3 supply (Castro et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2020). An alternative approach is similar to FACE (free-air carbon dioxide enrichment) experiment (Sheppard et al., 2011; Deshpande et al., 2024). Simply put, NH3 is supplied from a cylinder of pure compressed liquid NH3 and diluted with ambient air. Although this approach has the advantage of being closer to the real environment and simultaneous studies of many biological scales and processes, scaling up this approach to the field is challenging due to its high cost.

In addition, NH3 enriched in a stable isotope of nitrogen (15NH3) is an accurate and convincing tool for quantifying the absorption and distribution of NH3 by plants. In previous studies, the simulation of 15NH3 deposition was mostly achieved by injecting a certain amount of pure 15NH3 or its reaction substrate into the chamber (Tomaszewski and Sievering, 2007; Bazot et al., 2008; Silva et al., 2015). A continuous and controllable supply of 15NH3 will undoubtedly increase the difficulty and cost of simulation. Jones et al. (2008) used peristaltic pumps to continuously mix NaOH and (15NH4)2SO4 solution, and then used the 15NH3 generated by the reaction of the mixed solution to simulate the 15NH3 deposition. Although this ingenious approach achieves the above conditions, the generation of 15NH3 in this approach is limited by the flow rate of the air used for mixing.

Overall, it is necessary to provide a new simple, low-cost and safe solution for the simulation of NH3/15NH3 deposition in greenhouses, indoor controlled environment chambers or OTCs. In this study, we devised and tested the Syringe Pump Gas Distribution (SPGD) system for simulating NH3/15NH3 deposition. This system allows for precise mixing of high-purity NH3/15NH3 with air using a microinjection pump, enabling accurate simulation of NH3/15NH3 deposition. We verified the feasibility of the SPGD system by performing NH3/15NH3 deposition treatment on Populus cathayana seedlings within the chamber. We describe in detail the components involved in SPGD system and its simpler and safer simulation process of NH3/15NH3 deposition.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 NH3/15NH3 generation and collection in the laboratory

We added well-mixed NH4Cl/15NH4Cl and Ca(OH)2 solids in a test tube and allowed them to react under heating conditions. The generated NH3/15NH3 was dried by soda lime and collected in a Teflon- aluminum foil gas sampling bag (see Supplementary Figure S1 for a schematic diagram of the reaction apparatus). The concentration of NH3/15NH3 in the syringes, determined through Water Absorption, was found to exceed 90% (Supplementary Figure S2).

2.2 Syringe Pump Gas Distribution system: components, installation and operation

The SPGD system is mainly composed of air supply unit, NH3 supply unit and chamber. Briefly, the ambient air provided by the air compressor is continuously mixed with the NH3 provided by the microinjection pump, and the mixed gas is used to simulate NH3 deposition in the chamber (Figure 1). In the SPGD system, except for the chamber (see below), all components are common pneumatic or laboratory supplies. The total cost of a single system is approximately $249. The following are the installation instructions for the components in each unit and the operating instructions for the SPGD system (see Figure 2 for basic components and Supplementary Table S1 for bill and specifications of components).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. A schematic diagram showing the Syringe Pump Gas Distribution (SPGD) system. Within the chamber are Populus cathayana potted seedlings. PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate. The yellow arrow and the blue arrow represent the flow direction of ammonia and air in the tube respectively.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Basic components of the Syringe Pump Gas Distribution (SPGD) system: (A) Air compressor; (B) Microinjection pump; (C) Syringe; (D) Capillary tube; (E) Water separator; (F) Reduction valve; (G) Activated charcoal filter; (H) Rotor flowmeter; (I) Venturi gas mixer; (J) Gas tube.

1. Air supply unit: The air supply unit is mainly composed of an air compressor, a water separator, a reduction valve and an activated charcoal filter. The ambient air compressed by the air compressor is pumped into Venturi gas mixer after passing through the water separator, reduction valve, activated charcoal filter and rotor flowmeter in turn (Figure 1). The flow rate of the output air from the air compressor is controlled by adjusting the rotor flowmeter and is kept uniform by the reduction valve (Figure 3). Pneumatic quick connectors, pagoda connectors or polyethylene tubes are used to connect the components. The selection of specifications for each component of the air supply unit depends on the air exchange rate (i.e. air flow rate) in the deposition. In this study, for an air flow rate of 30 L min-1, we chose an air compressor with a power of 1580 watts; a pressure-reducing valve, a moisture filter, and an activated charcoal filter with inlet and outlet thread sizes of 13.2 mm (1/4-inch threads); and 8*10 mm polyethylene tubes. The reason we choose the Venturi gas mixer is to avoid the influence of the high pressure of the air supply unit on the NH3 supply unit. See Supplementary Figures S3-S6 for the connection guide of each component.

2. NH3 supply unit: The NH3 supply unit is mainly composed of a microinjection pump and a syringe. The prepared NH3/15NH3 in the syringe is continuously pumped into the gas mixer through a microinjection pump. The operating characteristics of the microinjection pump (i.e., uniform motion throughout, smooth and pulsation-free) allow for precise control of the NH3 flow rate at its output (Figure 3). Microinjection pump propulsion linear velocity adjustment resolution and the minimum value of linear velocity range should not be greater than 0.01 mm min-1. The syringe and the gas mixer are equipped with Luer connectors, and they are connected with 0.2*0.4 mm stainless steel needles and 0.3*0.6 mm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) capillary tubes. The gas mixer and the chamber are equipped with a pagoda connector, and they are connected with 8*10 mm PTFE tubes. The unit is placed in a modified storage box, which is designed to be easy to handle as well as dustproof (Supplementary Figure S7).

3. The open-top chamber in this study was made of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), with flange links at the openings. The air inlet is located at the top of the flange cover and the air outlet and drain are located at the bottom of the chamber. Two fans are installed in the chamber to reduce the difference in NH3 concentration over horizontal space.

4. Simulation of deposition: Here we outline the instructions for operating the SPGD system. After powering on all equipment, start by turning on the air pump switch to inflate the air pump. Next, extract the NH3 in the gas collection bag using a syringe and then install the syringe on the syringe pump. Finally, operate the syringe pump and air pump while adjusting the flow rates of NH3 and air. When running the SPGD system, it is important to minimize the pressure difference between the reduction valve, activated charcoal filter, and the rotor flowmeter in order to prevent the formation of condensation water inside the activated charcoal filter and rotor flowmeter. In addition, the air tank of the air compressor should be drained and the filter element in the water separator should be replaced regularly. In this study, we regulated the NH3 concentration in the gas mixture by adjusting the syringe pump propulsion linear velocity, and assumed that the NH3 in the syringe pump was pure when calculating NH3 concentration. The NH3 concentration was calculated as follows:

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Principle of operation of the Syringe Pump Gas Distribution (SPGD) system and functions of the main components. The yellow arrow and the blue arrow represent the flow direction of ammonia and air in the system respectively.

ρN=(SS×Ql×14Vm×QL)×1000

Where ρN is the concentration of NH3 (μg N m-3), SS is the cross-sectional area of the syringe inner diameter (mm2), Ql is the linear velocity of the injection pump (mm min-1), 14 is the molar mass of nitrogen atom (g mol-1), Vm is the molar volume of gas (L mol-1), QL is the total gas flow rate in the system (L min-1). For example, at a temperature of 25°C (with a molar volume of 24.5 L mol-1), and a total gas flow rate of 60 L min-1, utilizing a syringe with an inner diameter of 19 mm and a syringe pump with a linear velocity resolution of 0.01 mm min-1, the calculated theoretical minimum resolution for adjusting NH3 concentration is approximately 27 μg N m-3.

5. Maintenance of the SPGD system: In the SPGD system, the rotor flowmeter, microinjection pump and reduction valve are key components for supplying a stable and controllable concentration of NH3 (Figure 3). Therefore, regular calibration of the rotor flowmeter, the microinjector pump and the reduction valve is essential to ensure the accuracy and stability of the SPGD system in long-term use. In this study, for the rotor flowmeter, the error was calculated by comparing the time required for the gas output from the flowmeter to fill a gas collection bag of known volume with the preset value. For the microinjection pump, the error was calculated by comparing the propulsion travel of the microinjection pump per unit time with the preset value. The error of syringe pumps and flow meters was controlled within ± 5%, beyond which the equipment was repaired or replaced. In a normal operating reduction valve - rotor flowmeter system, the gas flow rate indicated by the flowmeter was stable and free of fluctuations. Therefore, the calibration of the reduction valve was determined by observing the reading of the rotor flowmeter. In addition, other components in the SPGD system were checked regularly to ensure the functional integrity of the SPGD system. After calibration or replacement of components, the NH3 concentration output by the system was tested and compared with the theoretical value to verify the accuracy of the maintained SPGD system.

3 Test in the greenhouse and results

From August 1 to August 21, 2023, we conducted experiments using the SPGD system to test 1-year-old P. cathayana seedlings in a greenhouse (with simulated rainfall) (Figure 4). The SPGD system was operated from 6:00 to 18:00 each day during the test. We established three pre-determined NH3 concentration treatments: Control (0 μg N m-3, no NH3 applied), LN (216 μg N m-3), and HN (432 μg N m-3). Each concentration had two systems, totaling six chambers. The air flow rate for each system was 30 L min-1, with 36 seedlings in each chamber. On August 21, 2023, we replaced NH3 with 15NH3. During the test, the temperature in the greenhouse was 23-34 °C and the relative humidity was 60-100% (90%-100% during simulated rainfall). During the operation of the SPGD system, the maximum light intensity in the chamber was 23,600 lux, the average temperature was 28.5 °C, and the relative humidity was 40-60%. On the first day of the test, we measured the NH3 concentrations at the inlet and outlet of the chamber every 2 h using a pump suction NH3 detector (JA908 NH3; Yongqi Co. Ltd, GuangDong, China; Accuracy, ≤ ± 3% F.S; Detection limit, 20 ppb) and NH3 detection tube (3CG Ammonia; GASTEC, Tokyo, Japan; Detection limit, 0.02 mg m-3), and collected ambient temperature and relative humidity every 1h at a distance of 1.5 m above the floor and 5 m from the SPGD system (Supplementary Figure S8). Before the test, the correction factor for NH3 adsorption on the chamber inner wall was determined by running the SPGD system without plant-soil material, and the air flow rate was set to 30 L min-1. To calculate the correction factor, the factor of NH3 adsorption on the inner wall of the chamber was calculated:

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The Syringe Pump Gas Distribution (SPGD) system set up in the greenhouse: (A) SPGD system as a whole; (B) NH3 supply unit; (C) Gas supply unit.

ρC=ρInρOut(empty)

Where ρC is the factor of NH3 adsorption on the inner wall of the chamber (μg N m-3), ρIn is the measured NH3 concentration at the inlet of the chamber (μg N m-3), ρOut(empty) is the measured NH3 concentration at the outlet of the chamber without plant-soil material (μg N m-3).

The correction factor was then obtained by calculating the difference between the total area of the chamber inner wall and the vertical projection area of the soil-plant material in the chamber after the start of the test:

ρX=ρC×(1SPSC)

Where ρX is the correction factor (μg N m-3), SP is the vertical projection area of the plant-soil material (m2), the inner wall of the chamber covered by this area is considered to be free of NH3 adsorption. SC is the total area of the chamber inner wall (m2).

After obtaining the correction factor (about 40 μg N m-3, see Supplementary Table S2, Supplementary Figure S9 for detail parameter values), the NH3 deposition flux was calculated from the difference of measured NH3 concentration between the inlet and outlet of the chamber:

FN=(ρInρOutρX)×Q×T×1SP×106

Where FN is the NH3 deposition flux (mg N m-2 d-1) and is defined as the NH3 retained by the plant-soil system in the chamber. ρOut is the measured NH3 concentration at the outlet, Q is the total gas flow rate (L min-1), which is consistent with the flow rate when calculating ρX, T is the SPGD system operation time per day (min d-1).

After the SPGD system had been working for 40 min, we used the detector (connected a gooseneck tube) to detect the NH3 concentration at three horizontals in the chamber to determine the degree of mixing between NH3 and air: 5 cm (below the canopy), 35 cm (in the canopy), and 55 cm (above the canopy) from the soil surface in the chamber. The mean NH3 concentrations were collected at four points at each horizontal. Every 5 days, we measured the inlet and outlet concentrations at the beginning of the experiment using the pump suction NH3 detector. In addition, we tested the performance of the SPGD system in creating NH3 concentrations at air flow rates of 15-100 L min-1.

On the last day of testing, we collected poplar leaves for analysis of δ15N. All leaves of 3 poplar seedlings were harvested immediately after 15NH3 deposition, and placed in a freezer (0-4°C) and brought back to the laboratory. In the laboratory, the tissue was oven-dried at 65°C until constant weight for N isotope measurements. All samples were ground into fine powders using a ball mill (MM400; Retsch, Haan, Germany). The N concentration and N stable isotope (atomic percentage of 15N and δ15N) were determined using the isotope ratio mass spectrometer (MAT 252; Thermo Electron, Bremen, Germany). Analytical quality was checked by standards (glycine) with known isotope abundance. The international standard for N is atmospheric N2 with an R (15N/14N) value of 0.003676. Instrument precision was 0.15‰ for δ15N. NH3 concentration and leaf δ15N were assessed using one-way ANOVA, and least significant difference tests were conducted to compare means of these. All statistical analysis mentioned above was performed using the SPSS software v19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Measured NH3 concentrations at the inlet indicated that the system could be operated stably for at least 12 h during the day (Figure 5), and there was no significant difference in the NH3 concentration during the 21 days of operation (Supplementary Figure S10). When the microinjection pump propulsion linear velocity remains constant, the NH3 concentration output by the system decreases in a power function as the flow rate increases (Figure 6). The NH3 concentrations at the inlet and outlet were 0 μg N m-3 in the Control treatment (the presence of NH3 was not detected by either detector), but the NH3 concentrations in the LN and HN treatments were lower than the theoretical values of about 16 μg N m-3 and 42 μg N m-3, respectively (Figure 5). The NH3 concentration at the outlet in both the LN and HN treatments was less than 28 μg N m-3. Therefore, the NH3 deposition fluxes in the chamber were calculated to be about 9.61 mg N m-2 d-1 and 21.01 mg N m-2 d-1, equivalent to 35 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and 77 kg N ha-1 yr-1, respectively. In addition, the mean NH3 concentrations at each horizontal in the chamber had no significant difference between different measurement points or at different times (Figure 7). The isotopic results showed that δ15N of leaf tissue was significantly increased in LN and HN treatments compared to Control treatment, and showed an increasing trend with the increase of NH3 deposition flux (Figure 8).

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. NH3 concentrations at the inlet and outlet of the chamber under LN (A) and HN (B) treatments. The black dotted lines indicate the theoretical value of NH3 concentration, the pink solid and dotted lines are the results from the pump suction detector, and the green solid and dotted lines are the results from the gas detector tube. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean of NH3 concentration (n = 3).

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. NH3 concentration output by the Syringe Pump Gas Distribution (SPGD) system at different gas flow rates. The red dashed line represents the theoretical expectation, based on the formula given in the study and assuming that the NH3 in the syringe is pure.

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. NH3 concentrations at three horizontals in the chamber: (A) location of measurement points per horizontal; (B) 55 cm from the soil surface, above the canopy; (C) 35 cm from the soil surface, in the canopy; (D) 5 cm from the soil surface, below the canopy. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean of NH3 concentration (n = 3).

Figure 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. δ15N in Populus cathayana leaves affected by three ammonia (NH3) deposition treatments. NH3 deposition treatments included a control (0 μg N m-3, no NH3 applied), LN (216 μg N m-3), and HN (432 μg N m-3). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean of δ15N (n = 3). Different letters above the error bar represent significant differences among three treatments (P < 0.05) according to the least significant difference test.

4 Discussion

4.1 Comments on the SPGD system

During the 21-day, 12-hour-a-day test, the NH3 concentration output by the SPGD system was stable and was not affected by changes in temperature and humidity in the environment (Figure 5; Supplementary Figure S8). In comparison to methods utilizing standard gas cylinders or high-precision mass flow meters, the SPGD system offers a lower cost (including maintenance costs), increased safety profile, and is equally accurate for creating a certain concentration of NH3 (Table 1). This is attributed to the utilization of the low-cost and high-precision microinjection pump and the preparation of near-pure NH3/15NH3 in the laboratory, eliminating the need for hazardous high-pressure gas cylinders and reducing NH3/15NH3 waste. Compared to the cumbersome adjustment of the flow rate of the NH3 source when using gas cylinders, the microinjection pump has a simpler operating process (e.g., its pre-set flow rate and run time, etc.). One person can complete the simulated deposition of 6 systems in less than 12 min during the test. Compared with gas cylinders or peristaltic pumps, syringes and microinjection pumps are more convenient to install, so the SPGD system has greater convenience and higher applicability in the establishment of NH3 deposition simulation (Table 1). In this study, the actual NH3 concentration created by the SPGD system was 89.4% to 95.6% of the theoretical value obtained by calculation (Figure 5; Supplementary Figure S2), which is consistent with the actual NH3 concentration in the syringe (i.e. exceed 90%). Therefore, the assumption that the NH3 in the syringe is pure is not valid. The difference between the actual NH3 concentration and the assumed concentration during the calculation (i.e. pure) in the syringe caused the NH3 concentration created by the SPGD system to differ from the theoretical value. In fact, this also confirmed the excellent performance of the SPGD system in terms of air tightness. More standardized NH3 production operations and syringe use (e.g., multiple flushing the gas collection bag, syringes, and related pipes with prepared NH3 to reduce the residual of pre-existing air) may increase the concentration of NH3 in the syringe and reduce the difference between the created NH3 concentration and the theoretical value.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary of simulation methods for NH3 deposition.

The disadvantage of the SPGD system is that its air supply unit inability to protect against dust and water. Although we used a rain shelter to block simulated precipitation in the greenhouse in this study (Figure 4), the use of the SPGD system under more complex conditions still faces challenges. For example, long-term rainfall may cause the electrical components of the air compressor to short-circuit, and the accumulation of dust may block the air inlet of the air compressor, etc. We recommend that the gas supply component of the system be placed in a relatively sealed space to accommodate its potential use in more complex conditions (such as in the field). Furthermore, while the closed chambers we used provide more precise control over deposition flux compared to free air enrichment and OTCs, they can experience excessively high internal temperatures (up to 50 °C) under full-light conditions in the field. Therefore, the customized chamber with controllable temperature is a potential solution to the limitation of high temperature. We found that the difference in NH3 concentration between the four points in the canopy at the same time was larger (although not statistically significant) compared to the other two horizontals (Figure 7). This may be due to different NH3 adsorption potentials resulting from differences in canopy structure. From a chamber design perspective, more fans or higher gas exchange rates within the chamber may help to reduce the difference in NH3 concentration over horizontal space (Jones et al., 2007).

4.2 Applicability of the SPGD system

The NH3 concentration output by the system in the gas flow rate range of 15-100 L min-1 was in line with theoretical expectations (Figure 6). Therefore, the SPGD system can meet the demand for different gas flow rates (i.e., gas exchange rates) in other studies. The excellent performance of the SPGD system under the environmental conditions of this study also shows that the system can be applied to most indoor or greenhouse research (Figure 5; Supplementary Figure S8). A single SPGD system has the capability to achieve a maximum deposition flux of 31.74 mg N m-2 d-1 (equivalent to 116 kg N ha-1 yr-1) over an area of 0.36 m2 by utilizing one 20 ml syringe per day. This makes it particularly suitable for research involving herbaceous plants, saplings, or branch materials. If a larger deposition area is needed, it is advisable to switch to a larger capacity syringe, or to change syringes to replenish NH3 (which can be done in under 2 min by a single operator). Although the amount of NH3 that can be supplied by the SPGD system has no advantage compared to some of previous studies (Table 1), we also recommend using multiple SPGD systems in parallel to simulate deposition in larger areas or at greater rates after weighing the cost. For the simulation of other compounds, e.g. NO2, SO2, their simulation methods have similarities with NH3, so the SPGD system may be equally useful, and multiple injectors in parallel can also be used for mixed deposition. When the air flow rate is constant, the SPGD system requires a higher-resolution syringe pump to adjust the NH3 concentration more accurately, which will increase the cost of components. Therefore, the resolution can also be improved by diluting the NH3 in the syringe by a certain multiple of air.

5 Conclusion

The proposed SPGD system is simple, stable and safe. A single SPGD system can simulate NH3/15NH3 deposition flux of 0 - 31.74 mg N m-2 d-1 (equivalent to 0 - 116 kg N ha-1 yr-1) over an area of 0.36 m2 using one 20 ml syringe. The system can be used for accurate NH3 deposition simulation or 15NH3 labeling of saplings or branches materials under greenhouse and indoor conditions. Overall, the SPGD system can provide a simpler, safer and lower-cost NH3/15NH3 deposition simulation solution for researchers working on gaseous deposition related issues.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

CW: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XW: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. CZ: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SK: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by the Science and Technology Innovation 2030-Agricultural Biological Breeding Major Project (2023ZD040580405).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the greenhouse provided by the Seed Orchard of Betula platyphylla at Northeast Forestry University and for the help of the staff there.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1460035/full#supplementary-material

References

Aber, J., McDowell, W., Nadelhoffer, K., Magill, A., Berntson, G., Kamakea, M., et al. (1998). Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems: hypotheses revisited. BioScience 48, 921–934. doi: 10.2307/1313296

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Adrizal, Patterson, P. H., Hulet, R. M., Bates, R. M. (2006). Growth and foliar nitrogen status of four plant species exposed to atmospheric ammonia. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B-Pesticides Food Contaminants Agric. Wastes 41, 1001–1018. doi: 10.1080/03601230600808703

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bazot, S., Blum, H., Robin, C. (2008). Nitrogen rhizodeposition assessed by a 15NH3 shoot pulse-labelling of Lolium perenne L. grown on soil exposed to 9 years of CO2 enrichment. Environ. Exp. Bot. 63, 410–415. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.020

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Castro, A., Stulen, I., Posthumus, F. S., De Kok, L. J. (2006). Changes in growth and nutrient uptake in Brassica oleracea exposed to atmospheric ammonia. Ann. Bot. 97, 121–131. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcj007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., Ren, X., Hussain, S., Hussain, S., Saqib, M. (2020). Effects of elevated ammonia concentration on corn growth and grain yield under different nitrogen application rates. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 20, 1961–1968. doi: 10.1007/s42729-020-00267-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Deshpande, A. G., Jones, M. R., van Dijk, N., Mullinger, N. J., Harvey, D., Nicoll, R., et al. (2024). Estimation of ammonia deposition to forest ecosystems in Scotland and Sri Lanka using wind-controlled NH3 enhancement experiments. Atmospheric Environ. 320, 120325. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120325

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, H. Y., Li, H., Xiang, D., Liu, Q., Li, F., Liang, B. (2020). Translocation and recovery of 15N-labeled N derived from the foliar uptake of NH3 by the greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J. Integr. Agric. 19, 859–865. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62670-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, M. R., Leith, I. D., Fowler, D., Raven, J. A., Sutton, M. A., Nemitz, E., et al. (2007). Concentration-dependent NH3 deposition processes for mixed moorland semi-natural vegetation. Atmospheric Environ. 41, 2049–2060. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, M. R., Raven, J. A., Leith, I. D., Cape, J. N., Smith, R. I., Fowler, D. (2008). Short-term flux chamber experiment to quantify the deposition of gaseous 15N-NH3 to Calluna vulgaris. Agric. For. Meteorology 148, 893–901. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.12.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Schichtel, B. A., Walker, J. T., Schwede, D. B., Chen, X., Lehmann, C. M. B., et al. (2016). Increasing importance of deposition of reduced nitrogen in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States America 113, 5874–5879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525736113

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, L., Zhang, X. Y., Xu, W., Liu, X. J., Wei, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2020). Global estimates of dry ammonia deposition inferred from space-measurements. Sci. Total Environ. 730, 139189. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139189

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, X. K., Mao, Q. G., Gilliam, F. S., Luo, Y. Q., Mo, J. M. (2014). Nitrogen deposition contributes to soil acidification in tropical ecosystems. Global Change Biol. 20, 3790–3801. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12665

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Paoli, L., Maslanáková, I., Grassi, A., Loppi, S. (2015). Effects of acute NH3 air pollution on N-sensitive and N-tolerant lichen species. Ecotoxicology Environ. Saf. 122, 377–383. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.08.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheppard, L. J., Leith, I. D., Mizunuma, T., Cape, J. N., Crossley, A., Leeson, S., et al. (2011). Dry deposition of ammonia gas drives species change faster than wet deposition of ammonium ions: evidence from a long-term field manipulation. Global Change Biol. 17, 3589–3607. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02478.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, L. C. R., Salamanca-Jimenez, A., Doane, T. A., Horwath, W. R. (2015). Carbon dioxide level and form of soil nitrogen regulate assimilation of atmospheric ammonia in young trees. Sci. Rep. 5, 13141. doi: 10.1038/srep13141

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tanner, E., Buchmann, N., Eugster, W. (2022). Agricultural ammonia dry deposition and total nitrogen deposition to a Swiss mire. Agriculture Ecosyst. Environ. 336, 108009. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tomaszewski, T., Sievering, H. (2007). Canopy uptake of atmospheric N deposition at a conifer forest: Part II-response of chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange parameters. Tellus Ser. B-Chemical Phys. Meteorology 59, 493–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00265.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Van der Eerden, L. J., Lekkerkerk, L. J., Smeulders, S. M., Jansen, A. E. (1992). Effects of atmospheric ammonia and ammonium sulphate on Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Environ. pollut. 76, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(92)90109-N

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Warner, J. X., Dickerson, R. R., Wei, Z., Strow, L. L., Wang, Y., Liang, Q. (2017). Increased atmospheric ammonia over the world’s major agricultural areas detected from space. Geophysical Res. Lett. 44, 2875–2884. doi: 10.1002/2016GL072305

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, C. Z., Zhou, S. Y., Cheng, X., Wei, X. (2023). Alternating processes of dry and wet nitrogen deposition have different effects on the function of canopy leaves: Implications for leaf photosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1105075

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: ammonia, chamber, dry deposition, forest ecosystem, isotope labeling, nitrogen deposition

Citation: Wu C, Wei X, Zhang C and Khan S (2025) The Syringe Pump Gas Distribution (SPGD) system: a simple and low-cost method for simulating NH3/15NH3 deposition. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1460035. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1460035

Received: 06 September 2024; Accepted: 05 March 2025;
Published: 28 March 2025.

Edited by:

Majid Sharifi-Rad, Zabol University, Iran

Reviewed by:

Guancheng Liu, Qufu Normal University, China
Shichun Zhang, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Copyright © 2025 Wu, Wei, Zhang and Khan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xing Wei, d2VpeGluZzk0QG5lZnUuZWR1LmNu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more