Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Nutrition
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1531932
This article is part of the Research Topic Interplay Between Plant Nutrient Uptake and Abiotic Stress View all articles

Integrated Physiological and Transcriptomic Analysis Uncovers the Mechanism of Moderate Nitrogen Application on Promoting the Growth and (-)-Borneol Accumulation of Blumea balsamifera

Provisionally accepted
Yuan Yuan Yuan Yuan 1*Weijie Tang Weijie Tang 2*Jia-Yuan Cao Jia-Yuan Cao 2*Ke Zhong Ke Zhong 2*Ze-Jun Mo Ze-Jun Mo 2*Ying Zhou Ying Zhou 2*Yu-Xin Pang Yu-Xin Pang 2*
  • 1 School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2 College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Blumea balsamifera, a half-woody plant belonging to the Asteraceae family, is valued as both a medicinal and industrial crop primarily for its phytochemical component, (-)-borneol. Nitrogen (N) is essential for regulating the growth of B. balsamifera and the biosynthesis of (-)-borneol; however, the molecular mechanisms by which N influences these processes remain inadequately understood. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of N on growth and (-)-borneol synthesis at the molecular level. A field experiment was conducted in which B. balsamifera plants were fertilized with three different nitrogen regimes: 0 kg N ha -1 (control, CK), 150 kg N ha -1 (N1 treatment), and 300 kg N ha -1 (N2 treatment).Physiological and biochemical assessments were performed to evaluate the growth and metabolic responses of the plants under these varying N conditions. Additionally, transcriptome sequencing of leaves of B. balsamifera was conducted to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms involved. The results indicated that both the N1 and N2 treatments significantly promoted the growth of B. balsamifera, with the 150 kg N ha -1 treatment (N1) resulting in the most favorable effects. The leaves harvested in October, November, and December presented the greatest accumulation of (-)-borneol, with corresponding yields of 782 mg plant -1 , 1102 mg plant -1 , and 1774 mg plant -1 , respectively, which were significantly different from those observed in the CK and N2 treatments. Comparative transcriptome analysis revealed a total of 6,714 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Notably, several DEGs associated with auxin signaling and N metabolism were upregulated in the N1 and N2 treatments. In contrast, many DEGs related to carbohydrate metabolism, terpenoid backbone biosynthesis, monoterpenoid biosynthesis, and flavonoid biosynthesis were significantly upregulated in the CK treatment. Moreover, potential transcription factors (TFs) that may link N nutrition with the synthesis of medicinal components were identified. The CK treatment appeared to promote (-)-borneol synthesis by inducing the terpenoid synthase gene (BbTPS) and MYB TFs in the leaves of B. balsamifera. Our findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between N nutrition and (-)-borneol yield in B. balsamifera, offering valuable insights for future cultivation practices.

    Keywords: Blumea balsamifera, Nitrogen, Transcriptome, Growth, (-)-Borneol, terpenoid

    Received: 21 Nov 2024; Accepted: 31 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Yuan, Tang, Cao, Zhong, Mo, Zhou and Pang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Yuan Yuan, School of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
    Weijie Tang, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
    Jia-Yuan Cao, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
    Ke Zhong, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
    Ze-Jun Mo, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
    Ying Zhou, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
    Yu-Xin Pang, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.