Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci., 14 January 2025
Sec. Plant Development and EvoDevo
This article is part of the Research Topic Plant Meiosis and Gametogenesis Under Abiotic Stress View all articles

Revisiting the female germline cell development

Youmei Huang&#x;Youmei HuangYunlong Zhang&#x;Yunlong ZhangJiahong YangJiahong YangXinpeng XiXinpeng XiYanfen LiuYanfen LiuHanyang Cai*Hanyang Cai*Yuan Qin*Yuan Qin*
  • College of Life Sciences, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology, State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China

The formation of the female germline is the fundamental process in most flowering plants’ sexual reproduction. In Arabidopsis, only one somatic cell obtains the female germline fate, and this process is regulated by different pathways. Megaspore mother cell (MMC) is the first female germline, and understanding MMC development is essential for comprehending the complex mechanisms of plant reproduction processes. Recently, more advanced technologies such as whole-mount single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH), laser-assisted microdissection (LCM), chromatin immunoprecipitation/sequencing, and CRISPR gene editing have provided opportunities to reveal the mechanism of female germline development at different stages. Single-cell transcriptome/spatial transcriptomics analysis helps to investigate complex cellular systems at the single-cell level, reflecting the biological complexity of different cell types. In this review, we highlight recent progress that facilitates the development of the female germline to explore the roles of crucial gene regulatory networks, epigenetic pathways, cell-cycle regulators, and phytohormones in this process. This review discusses three key phases in female germline development and provides the possibility of distinct pathways restricting germline development in the future.

Introduction

The flowering plants exhibit a complex life cycle that alternates between diploid (sporophytic/somatic) and haploid (gametophytic) generations (Pinto et al., 2019). The reproductive cells of plants are usually re-evolved from somatic cells in the reproductive organs of flowers, such as pistils and stamens. In Arabidopsis, the formation of the female germline generally begins with the differentiation of a subepidermal cell at the top of the ovule primordia, which elongates and expands to form archesporial cell (AC) and further specialize into megaspore mother cell (MMC). The MMC undergoes one meiotic division to form four haploid megaspores. Among them, three megaspores near the micropore end experience programmed cell death, while only the megaspores at the chalazal end survive and successfully develop into functional megaspores (FMs). This stage in female germline development is referred to as megasporogenesis. Subsequently, FMs undergo the stage of megagametogenesis, which involves three rounds of continuous mitosis and leads to the production of a mature female gametophyte (FG), also known as the megagametophyte or embryo sac. The mature FG contains four different cell types, including three antipodal cells, one central cell, two synergid cells, and one egg cell. Both the egg cell and the central cell are fertilized, producing an embryo and an endosperm, respectively (Figure 1) (Yan et al., 2014; Cai et al., 2022b).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Female gametophyte development in Arabidopsis thaliana. The female germline took place in the distal domain of ovule. Only one subepidermal cell elongated and expanded to form archesporial cells (ACs) and further specialized into megaspore mother cells (MMCs). The MMCs underwent one meiotic division to form four haploid megaspores. Among them, three megaspores near the micropore end experienced degeneration rapidly, while only the megaspores at the chalazal end survived and successfully developed into functional megaspores (FMs). This stage in female germline development is referred to as megasporogenesis. The FMs underwent three rounds of continuous mitosis, which led to the production of a mature female gametophyte (FG), which contains four different cell types, including three antipodal cells, one central cell, two synergid cells, and one egg cell. This stage in female germline development is referred to as megagametogenesis. ii, inner integument; oi, outer integument; ch, chalaza; mp, micropyle; ac, antipodal cells; cc, central cell; sc, synergid cells; ec, egg cell.

The development of female gametophytes is a crucial step in the sexual reproduction process of most flowering plants. In Arabidopsis, only one somatic cell can obtain the female germline fate, and the program of somatic cells’ perception and response to germline-inducing signals is strictly controlled. Based on the phenotype analysis of ovule mutants, the progress of MMC development can be divided into three phases (or checkpoints). The first phase is related to the initiation of the female germline and regulates cell expansion. The second phase restricts the female germline into a single MMC in the ovule primordia, and the third phase controls the mechanisms of MMC entry into meiotic divisions and the subsequent three rounds of mitotic divisions (Pinto et al., 2019). In this review, we highlight the recent achievements to understand the mechanism of female germline development based on the aspects of i) the establishment of female germline identity, ii) ectopic acquisition of MMC identity, and/or iii) continued ectopic germline development (Figure 2).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The key factors and mechanisms that regulate megaspore mother cell (MMC) development in Arabidopsis. (A) The normal development processes of female germline in Arabidopsis. (B) The first phase is related to the initiation of the female germline and regulates cell expansion. The absence of key genes can prevent female germline formation in ovule primordia, such as SPL-WUS-WIH1/2 pathway. (C) The second phase restricts the female germline into a single MMC in ovule primordia. The related mutants will form multiple MMCs in ovule primordia, but only one MMC can undergo meiotic division, such as KLU-ARP6-WRKY28 signaling module and BR/BRI1-EPFL/ERf-BZR1 pathway. (D) The third phase controls the mechanisms of MMC entry meiotic divisions and the subsequent three rounds of mitotic divisions, such as KRP/ICK-CKA;1-RBR1-WUS pathway. The green box represents cell-cycle regulation, the blue box represents plant hormone pathways, and the red box represents epigenetic pathways.

The key factors function in the initiation of female germline identity

There are several essential genes in the establishment of the female germline, and the absence of these genes can prevent female germline formation. In Arabidopsis, SPOROCYTELESS/NOZZLE (SPL/NZZ) has been early demonstrated to play an important role in the process of somatic to germline transformation, and spl/nzz mutants can form archesporial cells in both anther and the ovule primordia, but these cells fail to differentiate into pollen mother cells (PMCs) and MMCs (Schiefthaler et al., 1999; Yang et al., 1999). SPL/NZZ encodes a nuclear localization protein homologous to the MADS box transcription factors and a putative MYC-type helix–loop–helix dimerization domain signature at the carboxy-terminal (Yang et al., 1999). A further study has found that SPL/NZZ functions as an adaptor-like transcriptional repressor using its EAR motif at the C-terminal end to recruit TOPLESS/TOPLESS-RELATED (TPL/TPR) corepressors to inhibit the activities of CINCINNATA (CIN)-like TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PCF (TCP) transcription factors during MMC formation (Figure 2B) (Chen et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2015). Conversely, loss of TPL1 function and overexpression of TCP transcription factors result in no MMC formation in the ovule primordia, which is similar to the phenotype of the spl/nzz mutant (Figure 2B) (Wei et al., 2015).

WUSCHEL (WUS) transcription factor is best known for its function to maintain stem cell fate in the shoot apical meristem (SAM) (Mayer et al., 1998), which also plays a key role in MMC formation. Like spl/nzz mutants, wus mutants also lack a primary germline cell in the ovule primordia. Furthermore, both WUS and SPL/NZZ are expressed in the apical epidermal cell layer before MMC initiation (Figure 2B), indicating that SPL/NZZ and WUS may function in the same mechanism in MMC development and establish an environment for germline formation through cell autonomous components (Yang et al., 1999; Gross-Hardt et al., 2002; Lieber et al., 2011). SPL/NZZ was determined to act upstream of WUS since the expression of WUS is reduced in spl/nzz mutants (Yang et al., 1999; Lieber et al., 2011). Further research has found that WUS can regulate the expression of two redundantly acting genes, WINDHOSE 1 (WIH1) and WIH2, and the simultaneous absence of these two genes leads to loss of the MMC in the ovule primordia. WIH1 and WIH2 encode small peptides that may function as ligands for the tetraspanin-type transmembrane protein TORNADO 2 (TRN2)/EKEKO and the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) protein TRN1/LOPPED 1 in promoting MMC formation (Figure 2B) (Lieber et al., 2011). However, the interaction between WIH and TRN in promoting the transition of somatic to female germline still needs to be demonstrated.

The number of ACs or MMCs is strictly limited during the development of ovules. In other flowering plants, they appear to use a lateral inhibition mechanism that allows the MMC to repress germline cell fate in its surrounding cells, thereby regulating the number of MMC. In rice, TAPETUM DETERMINANT-LIKE 1A (OsTDL1A) encodes a class of small peptides that are preferentially expressed in MMC (Zhao et al., 2008). MULTIPLE SPOROCYTE (OsMSP1) encodes a leucine-rich-repeat receptor kinase, expressed in the L1 layer cells surrounding MMC (Nonomura et al., 2003). Further research has found that OsTDL1A can directly bind to OsMSP1, inhibiting the transformation of somatic cells around MMC into female germline (Zhao et al., 2008). In maize, MULTIPEARCESPORIAL CELLS 1 (MAC1), the OsTDL1A homologous gene, plays roles in the switch of the hypodermal cells from the vegetative to the meiotic (sporogenous) pathway in ovule development (Sheridan et al., 1996; Wang et al., 2012). In the mac1 mutant, several hypodermal cells develop into archesporial cells, and the resulting megasporocytes undergo normal meiosis, ultimately developing into embryo sacs (Wang et al., 2012).

Epigenetic pathways involved in female gametophyte development

Epigenetic reprogramming is widely present in female gametophyte development. ARGONAUT (AGO) is an essential component of the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) mechanism, which can regulate mRNAs during miRNA- or siRNA-guided post-transcriptional gene silencing (Havecker et al., 2010; Olmedo-Monfil et al., 2010). AGO9 interacts with 24-nt small RNAs (sRNAs) to silence transposable elements (TEs) in the nucellus to control the specification of germline cells (Olmedo-Monfil et al., 2010). In a previous study, AGO9 had abundant expression in the epidermal cell layer (L1), and further study found that the nucleus of the MMC in several ecotypes sporadically shows AGO9 expression, suggesting that a transient nuclear AGO9 localization can be found in the MMC (Rodriguez-Leal et al., 2015). Furthermore, the expression patterns of AGO9 localized in the multiple abnormal gamete precursors of rdr6 mutants share a cellular identity with the gamete precursors found in selected ecotypes. These results indicate that AGO9 is involved in epigenetic silencing that controls the specification of female gamete precursors, which may be used to indicate the formation of germ cells (Rodriguez-Leal et al., 2015). Furthermore, approximately 50% of ago9 mutant ovules display supernumerary MMCs (Figure 2C). Therefore, it is speculated that AGO9 may bind to the 24-nt sRNAs to regulate TEs in MMC and its accessory cells, but different cell types may affect sRNA accumulation or gene silencing partners, which may be the reason for the production of multiple MMCs in the ago9 mutant (Olmedo-Monfil et al., 2010). Further studies found that loss-of-function mutants of other AGO proteins, including AGO4, AGO6, and AGO8, also exhibit multiple MMC-like cells in the ovule primordia, but the identity of these cells still needs to be further determined. These results support the role of the RNA-based silencing mechanism in preventing the abnormal specification of multiple premeiotic gametophytic precursors during early ovule development (Figure 2C) (Hernandez-Lagana et al., 2016). A recent report found that the Arabidopsis mutant alleles mir822-1 and mir822-2 display extra FMs and divide without giving rise to differentiated female gametophytes (Tovar-Aguilar et al., 2024). Overexpression of miR822 target genes At5g02350, At5g02330, and At2g13900 show similar defects equivalent to those found in mir822 mutant plants, and these three microRNA822 (miR822) target genes are overexpressed in ago9 mutant ovules, indicating that miR822 acts through an AGO9-dependent pathway to modulate monosporic development in Arabidopsis (Tovar-Aguilar et al., 2024).

RNA DEPENDENT POLYMERASE 6 (RDR6) and SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3) are essential parts of the biogenesis of trans-acting small interfering RNAs (tasiRNAs) (Yoshikawa et al., 2005). The mutation of RDR6 and SGS3 also showed an identical phenotype to ago9 mutants with supernumerary MMCs in the ovule primordia, which suggests that the movement of sRNA silencing out of somatic companion cells is necessary for the specification of the MMC (Figure 2C) (Olmedo-Monfil et al., 2010). These results suggest that AGO9 controls gametic cell commitment by acting in a non-cell autonomous sRNA-dependent pathway in ovule development (Yoshikawa et al., 2005; Olmedo-Monfil et al., 2010). In maize, AGO4 is likely a functional homolog of Arabidopsis AGO9, which is necessary for non-CG DNA methylation at centromeric and knob heterochromatin (Singh et al., 2011). AGO104 accumulates specifically in somatic cells surrounding the female meiocyte. The absence of AGO104 gives rise to unreduced gametes but not a multiple MMC phenotype. A further study found that the unreduced gametes underwent a mitotic rather than a meiotic division, consequently developing unreduced gametes (Singh et al., 2011). Another gene that plays a similar role is MNEME (MEM), which encodes for a putative ATP-dependent RNA helicase of the DEAD-box family that is also involved in the establishment of the epigenetic landscape in the female gametophyte (Schmidt et al., 2011). MEM is specifically expressed in MMC, and the mutation of MEM results in the formation of multiple MMC-like cells in the ovule primordia. However, whether the enlarged MMC-like cells in the mem mutant acquire MMC identities still needs to be further determined. Moreover, several mem mutants exhibit altered epigenetic modifications in gametophytic nuclei (Figure 2C). These results suggest that the potential function of MEM is in inhibiting germline fate in somatic cells and establishing a germline-specific chromatin state, but the mechanism is still unclear (Schmidt et al., 2011).

It is known that the RdDM pathway can regulate gene expression via AGO-mediated mRNA degradation or cytosine DNA methylation of target genes by DOMAINS REARRANGED METHLTRANSFERASES1 (DRM1) and DRM2 methylases (Marston, 2014). The pKNU::nlsYFP transcriptional marker specifically marks cells possessing MMC identity. drm1 drm2 double mutants also present supernumerary MMC-like cells in the ovule primordia, but only one cell expressed pKNU::nlsYFP signal, which is similar to other mutants of the RdDM pathway (Marta et al., 2020). SPL/NZZ is ectopically expressed in ago9, rdr6, and drm1drm2 mutants, and SPL/NZZ is essential for MMC differentiation, indicating that the excessive MMC-like cell development may be due to the ectopic activation of SPL/NZZ (Figure 2C) (Marta et al., 2020). Recently, the RdDM pathway has been reported connected to SEEDSTICK (STK) to control ovule development. SEEDSTICK (STK) is a MADS-box transcription factor, which is expressed in many sporophytic cell types, including the nucellus, chalaza, and integuments (Matias-Hernandez et al., 2010). In stk mutants, nearly one-half of ovules contain multiple MMC-like cells, but only one cell expressed pKNU::nlsYFP signal. A further study found that STK directly regulates the expression of AGO9 and RDR6 in the ovule and therefore indirectly SPL/NZZ expression (Figure 2C) (Marta et al., 2020). Although stk, ago9, rdr6, and drm1 drm2 mutants display excessive MMC-like cells in the ovule primordia, only one MMC can enter the meiotic program (Marta et al., 2020).

In most sexual flowering plants, the female gametogenesis is initiated from the subepidermal L2 somatic cell that undergoes a fate transition from somatic cells to germ cells (Yang and Sundaresan, 2000). This process is accompanied by large-scale chromatin reprogramming, such as chromatin decondensation, heterochromatin reduction, depletion of linker histones, and core histone variants change, which may establish an epigenetic and transcriptional status distinct from surrounding somatic cells (She et al., 2013). There are 15 H3-related genes of HISTONE THREE RELATED (HTR) in Arabidopsis (Okada et al., 2005). HTR13 typically encodes an H3.1 variant associated with inactive transcription, and most H3.1 histones are incorporated into the chromatin of proliferating tissues during the S-phase of DNA replication. Furthermore, H3.1 eviction is considered a characteristic of cell-cycle exit event that leads to pluripotent stem cell fate or cell differentiation. In the early stage of ovule development, H3.1 can be evicted in multiple subepidermal cells that may develop into MMC, and this state persists only in the MMC (Jacob et al., 2014). Therefore, the dynamic expression of H3.1 in the ovule primordium distinguishes the female germline from somatic cells and marks cell fate transition from somatic to germ cell (Figure 2C) (Jacob et al., 2014; Hernandez-Lagana and Autran, 2020). Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) usually catalyzes histone H2A monoubiquitination (H2Aub) to repress gene transcription (Yin et al., 2021). In Arabidopsis, RING1A and RING1B are the PRC1 complex catalytic subunits, and knockout RING1A and RING1B together cause severe defects in the formation of MMC and FM and subsequent mitosis of FM (Figure 2D) (Lv et al., 2024). The female gametophyte development essential genes, including AGO5, AGO9, WRKY23, REM34, REM35, and EDA8, were ectopically expressed in ring1a ring1b double mutants. The H2Aub levels at these loci were reduced in ring1a ring1b mutants, indicating that RING1A/B promotes H2Aub at genes that regulate female gametophyte development (Figure 2D) (Lv et al., 2024).

ACTIN-RELATED PROTEIN 6 (ARP6) is one of the subunits of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SWI2/SNF2-RELATED 1 (SWR1) (Wu et al., 2005). The mutation of ARP6 leads to the defects of female meiosis in Arabidopsis, including aberrant centromere pairing, loss of homologous chromosome pairing, and reduction in normal divalents (Rosa et al., 2013; Qin et al., 2014). DMC1 is a key recombinase for efficient pairing of homologous centromeres, which promotes the recombination of the sister chromosomes during meiosis (Da Ines et al., 2012). A further study found that DMC1 is significantly upregulated in the ovules of arp6 mutants, and H2A.Z was not enriched at any position of the DMC1 locus. These results indicate that ARP6 regulates the expression of DMC1 by modulating the deposition level of H2A.Z at the DMC1 locus, thereby affecting the meiotic divisions of the female germline (Figure 2D) (Qin et al., 2014). The cytochrome P450 gene KLU (also known as KLUH/CYP78A5) is preferentially expressed in the inner integument. Recent research has found that ARP6 mediates the incorporation of the histone variant H2A.Z at WRKY28 to promote its expression, and this process is dependent on KLU. WRKY28 encodes a zinc-finger WRKY TF, which acts downstream of KLU and ARP6 and is significantly reduced in arp6 klu double mutants. A further study found that WRKY28 is exclusively expressed in the hypodermal somatic cells surrounding MMC and inhibits these cells from acquiring MMC identity (Figure 2C) (Zhao et al., 2018). SET DOMAIN GROUP 2 (SDG2), the main H3K4 methyltransferase, is involved in various biological processes of plant development (Berr et al., 2010; She et al., 2013). The immunostaining results showed that the activated H3K4me3 histone modification was enriched in MMC (She et al., 2013). A recent report found that SWR1 and SDG2 cooperate with the ERECTA (ER) receptor kinase signaling pathway to control female germline development by restricting the MMC cell fate to a single cell in the ovule primordium (Figure 2C) (Cai et al., 2023a).

Cell-cycle regulators facilitate correct progression of a germline program

Unlike humans and animals, plants do not set aside a specialized germline that produces meiocytes in early embryogenesis. Instead, flowering plants need to specify somatic cells to undergo meiosis. Some cell-cycle regulators control the process of MMC entering meiosis. In the mutants of these cell-cycle regulators, the designated MMC undergoes several mitotic divisions, resulting in the formation of supernumerary MMCs. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are the universal drivers of cell-cycle transitions, which promote G1- to S-phase transition and activate genome duplication (De Veylder et al., 2001). The KIP RELATED PROTEINs/INHIBITOR OF CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASEs (KRPs/ICKs) are plant CDK inhibitors and modulate CDK enzymatic activity through direct protein binding, and the concentration or level of the ICK/KRP protein is likely important for its function (Wang et al., 1997; De Veylder et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2003; Juan Antonio et al., 2011). In the cell cycle, the inhibitory effect of Rb homolog RETINOBLASTOMA ASSOCIATED 1 (RBR1) is inhibited by cyclin-dependent kinase A;1 (CDKA;1) when it is phosphorylated. Recent studies have shown that KRP4, KRP6, and KRP7 act redundantly in the MMC to repress CDKA;1-dependent inactivation of the RBR1, and RBR1 directly inhibits WUS activity and promotes MMC to enter meiosis (Figure 2D) (Zhao et al., 2017). In the rbr1 mutants and krp4 krp6 krp7 triple mutants, multiple MMCs are formed, and the mitotic reporter CYCB1;2-GFP was observed in excessive MMCs, indicating that the failure of cell division transition from mitosis to meiosis may lead to the formation of excessive MMC (Figure 2D) (Zhao et al., 2017). ARID1, an AT-rich interacting domain transcription factor, exhibits a range of epigenetic regulation during cell differentiation (Deborah et al., 2005; Zheng et al., 2014). METHYLTRANSFERASE 1 (MET1) is required to maintain CG methylation, which plays a critical role in silencing transposable elements and regulating gene expression (Liu et al., 2021). It was found that MET1 is inhibited by ARID1 in MMC specification during female gametophyte development, but the mechanism remains unknown (Figure 2D) (Li et al., 2017). RBR1 was found to repress MET1 in the female gametophyte (Pauline et al., 2008). Therefore, future studies may consider whether ARID1-mediated MET1 inhibition in the female gametophyte is functionally related to the RB pathway.

Like rbr1 mutants, the ick1 ick2 ick3 ick4 ick5 ick6 ick7 septuple mutants (name as ick1/2/3/4/5/6/7) display more than one MMC and in the selective survival of FM. The origin of multiple MMCs in ick1/2/3/4/5/6/7 septuple mutants may result from mitotic division of the MMCs (Figure 2D) (Cao et al., 2018). E2F transcription factors have been reported to be involved in the G1–S-phase transition and play important roles in mammalian cell fate determination (Shirley and Doron, 2008). E2Fs are bound to and repressed by RBR1 and thereby block cell proliferation regulatory activity (Desvoyes and Gutierrez, 2020). In Arabidopsis, E2Fa, E2Fb, and E2Fc play redundant roles in plant germline formation. The e2fa e2fb e2fc triple mutants also form supernumerary MMCs as observed in rbr1 mutants, which implicates that E2Fs may be necessary to induce its repressor factor RBR1 (Figure 2C). In the e2fa e2fb e2fc triple mutant, the activity of RBR1 will decrease, leading to the formation of supernumerary MMCs (Yao et al., 2018). However, E2Fs and RBR1 may function in different pathways to regulate MMC specification. In addition, TRIMETHYLGUANOSINE SYNTHASE1 (TGS1) may also be involved in the process of cell division. The tgs1 mutants contain multiple enlarged cells, but the MMC marker gene pKNU was active in only one of them, suggesting that only the cell obtains female fate and enters meiosis (Lorena et al., 2023). Furthermore, the ovules of tgs1 mutants typically contained tetrads with the two chalaza megaspores specified for gametophytic development, while the micropylar spores will degenerate (Lorena et al., 2023).

Phytohormones may provide an environment supporting female germline development

Phytohormones are involved in various aspects of plant development, including the development of female germline (Cai et al., 2023b). Auxin signaling output was traced to megasporogenesis, and the auxin reporter DR5:GFP is only observed in one to three apical epidermal cells of the ovule primordium, suggesting a gradient of auxin in apical epidermal cells (Pagnussat et al., 2009). Auxin accumulation in a single cell will promote the expression of auxin response genes mediated by the transcription factor ARF (Auxin RESPONSE FACTOR) (Su et al., 2017). The auxin exporters PIN (PIN-FORMED) play unique roles in response to environmental and developmental signal transportation, resulting in localized changes in auxin concentration and distribution (Justyna et al., 2006). The expression of PIN1 is impaired in spl/nzz mutants, indicating that SPL/NZZ is involved in maintaining auxin homeostasis (Bencivenga et al., 2012). The recent report found that microRNA160 (miR160) targeted gene ARF17 (AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17) genetically interacts with the SPL/NZZ function in promoting MMC specification (Figure 2D) (Huang et al., 2022). In Arabidopsis, PIN1 is located in the outer layer of the nucellus of the ovule primordia, adjacent to the region formed by MMC. ARF17 and miR160 define the expression domain of PIN1, which contributes to establishment of the local auxin maximum at the ovule apex (Figure 2D) (Huang et al., 2022). ARF3 is also involved in ovule development, and its expression is regulated by trans-acting small interfering RNAs (known as tasiR-ARFs) (Su et al., 2017). ARF3 is detected in the central chalazal region, while ARF3m (tasiR-ARF-resistant version) spreads from the chalazal region to the distal nucellus except for the MMC, including the cells adjacent to the MMC, resulting in multiple MMC formation (Su et al., 2017). The expression of ARF3 in ta-siRNA biogenesis-related mutants (such as tex1 and tas3) extends from the chalazal region to the distal nucellus, which is similar to the expression pattern of ARF3m, indicating that TEX1 and TAS3 mediate the expression of ARF3, which restricts the formation of supernumerary MMC formation through non-cell autonomous pathway (Figure 2C) (Su et al., 2017).

Similar to auxin, brassinosteroid (BR) also has a gradient in the plant ovule. BR biosynthetic and signaling components genes were expressed exclusively in the sporophytic tissues of the ovule primordia, but not in the MMC (Cai et al., 2022a). Furthermore, BR-deficient mutants and BR-insensitive mutants bri1-116 and BRASSINOZOLE RESISTANT 1 (BZR1) family quintuple mutant qui-1 (bes1-1 bzr1-1 beh1-1 beh3-1beh4-1 quintuple mutant) produced excessive MMCs and further entry into meiosis. These results suggest that BR signaling influences the acquisition of female germline identity (Figure 2C) (Cai et al., 2022a). A further study found that BR signaling through the BZR1 transcription factor family and their targeted gene WRKY23 regulates female germline identity of the subepidermal cells adjacent to the MMC (Figure 2C) (Cai et al., 2022a). Furthermore, EPFL-ERf ligand–receptor pairs act upstream of the BZR1 family and coordinate regulation of female germline specification by directly activating the expression of encoded a nucleolar GTP-binding protein, NUCLEOSTEMIN-LIKE 1 (NSN1), which expressed in hypodermal cells surrounding the MMC and restricts these cells, acquiring female germline identity in the ovule primordia (Figure 2C) (Cai et al., 2023a). A recent study found that two key epigenetic factors SWR1 and SDG2 cooperate with the ER signaling pathway and their downstream BZR1 transcription factors to regulate female germline development by activating small RNA processor factors SERRATE (SE), HYPONASTIC LEAVES 1 (HYL1) and DICER-LIKE 1 (DCL1) (Figure 2D) (Cai et al., 2023a).

Gibberellins (GAs) are essential for many processes of plant growth and development, such as seed germination, elongation growth, flowering time, and embryo sac development (Achard and Genschik, 2009). The binding of GAs to the gibberellin receptor GIBBERELLIN-INSENSITIVE DWARF1 (GID1) leads to a conformational change in the N-terminal extension of GID1 and inhibits GA action (Miyako et al., 2005, 2007). The DELLA proteins belong to the plant-specific GRAS family and act as GA-signaling repressors, and the formation of GA-GID1-DELLA complex results in the rapid degradation of DELLA proteins, releasing the action of GA by destabilizing and degrading DELLA proteins (Sun, 2010; 2011). The two important GA components—GID1 and DELLA—play important roles in controlling ovule initiation and ovule number, respectively (Ferreira et al., 2017; Maria et al., 2018). In Arabidopsis, three genes—GID1a, GID1b, and GID1c—were identified in these plants and considered orthologous to the rice GID1. GID1a and GID1b were specifically expressed in the inner and outer integuments in the ovule, but GID1c was not detected in the ovule (Ferreira et al., 2017). Moreover, the gid1a single mutants and the gid1a gid1b and gid1a gid1c double mutants showed compromised fertility mainly caused by maternal defects (Carolina et al., 2014; Maria et al., 2018). The gid1a gid1b gid1c triple mutant is complete infertility due to defects in female gametophytes, while MMC development is normal (Carolina et al., 2014). In addition, overexpression of GID1a in the nucellus via the ovule-specific SEEDSTICK (STK) promoter and CaMV35S promoter leads to the formation of ovules with multiple MMC-like cells, but only one cell expressed pKNU::nlsYFP signal, completed the meiotic division, and entered the gametogenesis process (Figure 2C) (Ferreira et al., 2017). A recent study using a GA sensor (GA HACR, hormone-activated Cas9-based repressor) that relies on the GA-sensitive RGA has shown that endogenous bioactive GA hormone accumulates in MMCs and surrounding tissues, which indicates that GAs play roles in ovule primordia development (Dolores et al., 2020). However, the GA-mediated molecular mechanisms in MMC formation are still unclear.

Cytokinins have been hypothesized to play roles in plant cell division and differentiation (Inoue et al., 2001). In Arabidopsis, there are six cytokinin receptors: ARABIDOPSIS HISTIDINE KINASES 2 (AHK2), AHK3, AHK4/CRE1/WOL, AtHK1, CKI1, and CKI2/AHK5 (Inoue et al., 2001; Higuchi et al., 2004). Among them, CRE1, AHK2, and AHK3 have high homology within the assumed cytokinin-binding extracellular domain and are abundantly expressed during ovule development (Higuchi et al., 2004; Bencivenga et al., 2012). The ahk2 3 4 triple mutant ovules developed as finger-like structures and showed defects in the formation of the female gametophyte (Bencivenga et al., 2012). The isopentenyltransferase (IPT) family mediates the biosynthesis of CKs in different organisms, which are expressed during all phases of ovule development in Arabidopsis. Furthermore, AtIPT9 mutants also showed extra MMC-like cells, but the identity of these cells remains to be determined. These results suggest that the IPT family may play roles in the proper differentiation of a single MMC during ovule development (Figure 2C) (Ferreira et al., 2023).

Conclusion and future issues

The development of female gametophytes is a complex process, including MMC specification, FM formation, and its three rounds of continuous mitosis (Figure 1) (Chevalier et al., 2011). Along the distal–proximal axis of the Arabidopsis ovule primordia, the early ovule primordia can be divided into three regions: nucellus, chalaza, and funiculus (Schneitz et al., 1995). The most distal of these regions is the nucellus, which gives rise to produce female germline (Hou et al., 2021). MMC is the first female germline cell of most flowering plants, distinguished from its surrounding cells by the deposition of β-1,3-glucan (callus) in the cell wall, as well as an enlarged central nucleus, unique histone markers, and specific gene expression profiles (Webb and Gunning, 1990; Schmidt et al., 2011; She et al., 2013). Therefore, the intercellular communication between the female germline and its adjoining cells plays an important role in cell differentiation and reproduction. Given that the MMCs are hard to collect, there remain many questions about MMC formation. In recent times, more advanced technologies have provided opportunities to explore the mechanism of female germline formation (Pinto et al., 2019; Inderdeep et al., 2024). Single-cell transcriptome analysis provides an effective way to investigate complex cellular systems at the single-cell level, reflecting the biological complexity of different cell types and individual tissues. The MMC identity markers KNUCKLES (KNU) and ARGONAUTE9 (AGO9) are used to determine cell identity and collect candidate genes (Tucker et al., 2012). A recent study found that the β-1,3-glucan metabolism- and plasmodesmata-related genes are required for female gametogenesis in Arabidopsis through single-cell transcriptome analysis (Pinto et al., 2024). The concentrated expression of β-1,3-glucanase in the female germline temporarily disrupts the deposition of β-1,3-glucan, which promotes the intercellular communication between adjoining female germline and somatic cells and affects the germline gene expression and histone marks, eventually ultimately resulting in termination of female germline development (Pinto et al., 2024). In the near future, single-cell multiomics technologies in plants will make it possible for us to unravel the differences in genome, epigenome, transcriptome, translatome, proteome, and/or metabolome between the female germline and its adjoining somatic cells.

The formation of the female germline is a complex network, and different pathways are connected to ensure a single MMC formation and its subsequent development. SPL/NZZ seems to be the central regulator in female formation. WUS acts downstream of SPL/NZZ in MMC development, but the percentage of the spl/nzz mutant unable to produce a germline is significantly higher than that in the wus mutant, suggesting that SPL/NZZ plays additional functions independently of WUS (Figure 2B) (Yang et al., 1999; Gross-Hardt et al., 2002; Lieber et al., 2011). The interaction between SPL/NZZ and phytohormones may create the microenvironment for establishing a female germline. For example, auxin signaling is required for MMC formation in an ARF17- and SPL/NZZ-dependent manner; ARF17 and miR160 define the expression domain of PIN1, which contributes to the establishment of the local auxin maximum at the ovule apex and provide spatially restricted information for the proper specification of a single MMC per ovule, suggesting that phytohormones appear to provide the position cue in MMC specification (Figure 2D) (Huang et al., 2022). In addition, the expression of SPL/NZZ is repressed by the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway, which is required for restriction of the female germline to a single nucellus cell (Figure 2C) (Marta et al., 2020). Future studies may focus on understanding the mechanisms of how and when somatic cells perceive and respond to germline-inducing signals, as well as the mechanisms that inhibit multiple germline cells undergoing meiosis. Further details need to be elucidated on different pathways that lead to regulating germline specification. In addition, external environmental conditions are crucial for plant development, but there have been no reports on the effects of adverse conditions on female germline development. Advanced technology may facilitate the finding of new germline specification factors and their functional mechanisms.

Author contributions

YH: Writing – original draft. YZ: Writing – original draft. JY: Visualization, Writing – original draft. XX: Resources, Writing – original draft. YL: Visualization, Writing – original draft. HC: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YQ: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 32170352, 32270366, and 32370377). The Fujian “Young Eagle Program” Youth Top Talent Program, the Excellent Youth Foundation of Fujian Province (grant 2022J06014), and the Excellent Youth Foundation of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University awarded to HC (XJQ202108) are also acknowledged.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Achard, P., Genschik, P. (2009). Releasing the brakes of plant growth: how GAs shutdown DELLA proteins. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 1085–1092. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern301

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bencivenga, S., Simonini, S., Benkova, E., Colombo, L. (2012). The transcription factors BEL1 and SPL are required for cytokinin and auxin signaling during ovule development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 2886–2897. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.100164

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Berr, A., McCallum, E., Ménard, R., Meyer, D., Fuchs, J., Dong, A., et al. (2010). Arabidopsis SET DOMAIN GROUP2 is required for H3K4 trimethylation and is crucial for both sporophyte and gametophyte development. Plant Cell 22, 3232–3248. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.079962

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, H., Huang, Y., Liu, L., Zhang, M., Chai, M., Xi, X., et al. (2023a). Signaling by the EPFL-ERECTA family coordinates female germline specification through the BZR1 family in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 35, 1455–1473. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad032

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, H., Liu, L., Huang, Y., Zhu, W., Qi, J., Xi, X., et al. (2022a). Brassinosteroid signaling regulates female germline specification in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 32, 1102–1114.e1105. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, H., Liu, L., Ma, S., Aslam, M., Qin, Y. (2023b). Insights into the role of phytohormones in plant female germline cell specification. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 75, 102439. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2023.102439

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, H., Ma, S., Su, H., Liu, K., Aslam, M., Qin, Y. (2022b). Positional signals establishment in the regulation of female germline specification. Seed Biol. 1, 1–7. doi: 10.48130/SeedBio-2022-0006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, L., Wang, S., Venglat, P., Zhao, L. H., Cheng, Y., Yee, S. J., et al. (2018). Arabidopsis ICK/KRP cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors function to ensure the formation of one megaspore mother cell and one functional megaspore per ovule. PloS Genet. 14, e1007230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007230

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Carolina, G. G., Hu, J., Urbez, C., Gomez, M. D., Taiping, S., Perez-Amador, M. A. (2014). Role of the gibberellin receptors GID1 during fruit-set in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 79, 1020–1032. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12603

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, G., Sun, J., Liu, M., Liu, J., Yang, W. (2014). SPOROCYTELESS is a novel embryophyte-specific transcription repressor that interacts with TPL and TCP proteins in Arabidopsis. J. Genet. Genomics 41, 617–625. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2014.08.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chevalier, É., Loubert-Hudon, A., Zimmerman, E., Matton, D. (2011). Cell-cell communication and signalling pathways within the ovule: from its inception to fertilization. New Phytol. 192, 13–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03836.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Da Ines, O., Abe, K., Goubely, C., Gallego, M., White, C. (2012). Differing requirements for RAD51 and DMC1 in meiotic pairing of centromeres and chromosome arms in Arabidopsis thaliana. PloS Genet. 8, e1002636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002636

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Deborah, W., Loren, P., Hester M, W., Lois, M., Philip W, T., Elizabeth, M. (2005). Nomenclature of the ARID family of DNA-binding proteins. Genomics 86, 242–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.03.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Desvoyes, B., Gutierrez, C. (2020). Roles of plant retinoblastoma protein: cell cycle and beyond. EMBO J. 39, e105802. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105802

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

De Veylder, L., Beeckman, T., Beemster, G. T. S., Krols, L., Terras, F., Landrieu, I., et al. (2001). Functional analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors of arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13, 1653–1668. doi: 10.1105/TPC.010087%

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dolores, G. M., Daniela, B. T., Clara, F. A., Pablo, T., Alonso, J. M., Perez-Amador, M. A. (2020). Gibberellin-mediated RGA-LIKE1 degradation regulates embryo sac development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 7059–7072. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa395

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferreira, L. G., de Alencar Dusi, D. M., Irsigler, A. S. T., Gomes, A. C. M. M., Mendes, M. A., Colombo, L., et al. (2017). GID1 expression is associated with ovule development of sexual and apomictic plants. Plant Cell Rep. 37, 293–306. doi: 10.1007/s00299-017-2230-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferreira, L., Dusi, D., Irsigler, A., Gomes, A., Florentino, L., Mendes, M., et al. (2023). Identification of IPT9 in Brachiaria brizantha (syn. Urochloa brizantha) and expression analyses during ovule development in sexual and apomictic plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 50, 4887–4897. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-08295-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gross-Hardt, R., Lenhard, M., Laux, T. (2002). WUSCHEL signaling functions in interregional communication during Arabidopsis ovule development. Genes Dev. 16, 1129–1138. doi: 10.1101/gad.225202

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Havecker, E., Wallbridge, L., Hardcastle, T., Bush, M., Kelly, K., Dunn, R., et al. (2010). The Arabidopsis RNA-directed DNA methylation argonautes functionally diverge based on their expression and interaction with target loci. Plant Cell 22, 321–334. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.072199

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hernandez-Lagana, E., Autran, D. (2020). H3.1 eviction marks female germline precursors in arabidopsis. Plants (Basel) 9, 1322. doi: 10.3390/plants9101322

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hernandez-Lagana, E., Rodriguez-Leal, D., Lua, J., Vielle-Calzada, J. P. (2016). A multigenic network of ARGONAUTE4 clade members controls early megaspore formation in arabidopsis. Genetics 204, 1045–1056. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.188151

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Higuchi, M., Pischke, M. S., Mähönen, A. P., Miyawaki, K., Hashimoto, Y., Seki, M., et al. (2004). In planta functions of the Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 8821–8826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402887101

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., Zhao, L., Jin, X., Liu, L., et al. (2021). High-throughput single-cell transcriptomics reveals the female germline differentiation trajectory in Arabidopsis thaliana. Commun. Biol. 4, 1149. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02676-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, J., Zhao, L., Malik, S., Gentile, B. R., Xiong, V., Arazi, T., et al. (2022). Specification of female germline by microRNA orchestrated auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 13, 6960. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34723-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Inderdeep, K., Renu, K., Monika, K. (2024). Understanding megasporogenesis through model plants: contemporary evidence and future insights. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 68, 9–17. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.230222mk

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Inoue, T., Higuchi, M., Hashimoto, Y., Seki, M., Kobayashi, M., Kato, T., et al. (2001). Identification of CRE1 as a cytokinin receptor from Arabidopsis. Nature 409, 1060–1063. doi: 10.1038/35059117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jacob, Y., Bergamin, E., Donoghue, M. T., Mongeon, V., LeBlanc, C., Voigt, P., et al. (2014). Selective methylation of histone H3 variant H3.1 regulates heterochromatin replication. Science 343, 1249–1253. doi: 10.1126/science.1248357

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Juan Antonio, T. A., Larry C, F., Hong, W. (2011). Analyses of phylogeny, evolution, conserved sequences and genome-wide expression of the ICK/KRP family of plant CDK inhibitors. Ann. Bot. 107, 1141–1157. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Justyna, W., Jian, X., Daniela, S., Philip B, B., Kamil, R., Ikram, B., et al. (2006). Polar PIN localization directs auxin flow in plants. Science 312, 883. doi: 10.1126/science.1121356

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Wu, W., Zhao, Y., Zheng, B. (2017). A reciprocal inhibition between ARID1 and MET1 in male and female gametes in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 59, 657–668. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12573

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lieber, D., Lora, J., Schrempp, S., Lenhard, M., Laux, T. (2011). Arabidopsis WIH1 and WIH2 genes act in the transition from somatic to reproductive cell fate. Curr. Biol. 21, 1009–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W., Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Zhou, Y., Zhong, Z., Wang, M., Wongpalee, S. P., et al. (2021). Ectopic targeting of CG DNA methylation in Arabidopsis with the bacterial SssI methyltransferase. Nat. Communication 12, 3130. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23346-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lorena, A. ,. S., Caroline, M., Benjamin, S., Juan Manuel, V., Silvina C, P., Mathieu, I., et al. (2023). TRIMETHYLGUANOSINE SYNTHASE1 mutations decanalize female germline development in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 240, 597–612. doi: 10.1111/nph.19179

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lv, Y., Li, J., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Jiang, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2024). Polycomb proteins RING1A/B promote H2A monoubiquitination to regulate female gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 75, 4822–4836. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae208

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Maria, D. ,. G., Daniela, B.-T., Ernesto, E., Maite, S.-S., Ines, S., Asier, B.-M., et al. (2018). Gibberellins negatively modulate ovule number in plants. Development 145, dev163865. doi: 10.1242/dev.163865

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Marston, A. L. (2014). Chromosome segregation in budding yeast: sister chromatid cohesion and related mechanisms. Genetics 196, 31–63. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.145144

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Marta, A. ,. M., Rosanna, P., Mara, C., Edoardo, V., Stefano, G., Sara C, P., et al. (2020). The RNA-dependent DNA methylation pathway is required to restrict SPOROCYTELESS/NOZZLE expression to specify a single female germ cell precursor in Arabidopsis. Development 147, dev194274. doi: 10.1242/dev.194274

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Matias-Hernandez, L., Battaglia, R., Galbiati, F., Rubes, M., Eichenberger, C., Grossniklaus, U., et al. (2010). VERDANDI is a direct target of the MADS domain ovule identity complex and affects embryo sac differentiation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22, 1702–1715. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.068627

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mayer, K. F., Schoof, H., Haecker, A., Lenhard, M., Jurgens, G., Laux, T. (1998). Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell 95, 805–815. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81703-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Miyako, U.-T., Masatoshi, N., Ashikari, M., Makoto, M. (2007). Gibberellin receptor and its role in gibberellin signaling in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 58, 183–198. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103830

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Miyako, U.-T., Motoyuki, A., Masatoshi, N., Hironori, I., Etsuko, K., Masatomo, K., et al. (2005). GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1 encodes a soluble receptor for gibberellin. Nature 437, 693–698. doi: 10.1038/nature04028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nonomura, K. I., Miyoshi, K., Eiguchi, M., Suzuki, T., Miyao, A., Hirochika, H., et al. (2003). The MSP1 gene is necessary to restrict the number of cells entering into male and female sporogenesis and to initiate anther wall formation in rice. Plant Cell 15, 1728–1739. doi: 10.1105/tpc.012401

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Okada, T., Endo, M., Singh, M. B., Bhalla, P. L. (2005). Analysis of the histone H3 gene family in Arabidopsis and identification of the male-gamete-specific variant AtMGH3. Plant J. 44, 557–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02554.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Olmedo-Monfil, V., Duran-Figueroa, N., Arteaga-Vazquez, M., Demesa-Arevalo, E., Autran, D., Grimanelli, D., et al. (2010). Control of female gamete formation by a small RNA pathway in Arabidopsis. Nature 464, 628–U200. doi: 10.1038/nature08828

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pagnussat, G., Alandete-Saez, M., Bowman, J., Sundaresan, V. (2009). Auxin-dependent patterning and gamete specification in the Arabidopsis female gametophyte. Science 324, 1684–1689. doi: 10.1126/science.1167324

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pauline, E. J., Assaf, M., Mathieu, I., Tadashi, S., Nir, O., Frédéric, B. (2008). Retinoblastoma and its binding partner MSI1 control imprinting in Arabidopsis. PloS Biol. 6, e194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060194

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pinto, S. C., Leong, W. H., Tan, H., McKee, L., Prevost, A., Ma, C., et al. (2024). Germline β-1,3-glucan deposits are required for female gametogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 15, 5875. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50143-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pinto, S. C., Mendes, M. A., Coimbra, S., Tucker, M. R. (2019). Revisiting the female germline and its expanding toolbox. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 455–467. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.02.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, Y., Zhao, L. H., Skaggs, M. I., Andreuzza, S., Tsukamoto, T., Panoli, A., et al. (2014). ACTIN-RELATED PROTEIN6 regulates female meiosis by modulating meiotic gene expression in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26, 1612–1628. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.120576

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Leal, D., Leon-Martinez, G., Abad-Vivero, U., Vielle-Calzada, J. P. (2015). Natural variation in epigenetic pathways affects the specification of female gamete precursors in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27, 1034–1045. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.133009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosa, M., Von, M. H., Cigliano, R., Schlögelhofer, P., Mittelsten, O. S. (2013). The Arabidopsis SWR1 chromatin-remodeling complex is important for DNA repair, somatic recombination, and meiosis. Plant Cell 25, 1990–2001. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.104067

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schiefthaler, U., Balasubramanian, S., Sieber, P., Chevalier, D., Wisman, E., Schneitz, K. (1999). Molecular analysis of NOZZLE, a gene involved in pattern formation and early sporogenesis during sex organ development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 11664–11669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11664

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmidt, A., Wuest, S. E., Vijverberg, K., Baroux, C., Kleen, D., Grossniklaus, U. (2011). Transcriptome analysis of the arabidopsis megaspore mother cell uncovers the importance of RNA helicases for plant germline development. PloS Biol. 9, 1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001155

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schneitz, K., Hülskamp, M., Pruitt, R. E. (1995). Wild-type ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana: A light microscope study of cleared whole-mount tissue. Plant J. 7, 731–749. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.07050731.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

She, W., Grimanelli, D., Rutowicz, K., Whitehead, M. W., Puzio, M., Kotlinski, M., et al. (2013). Chromatin reprogramming during the somatic-to-reproductive cell fate transition in plants. Development 140, 4008–4019. doi: 10.1242/dev.095034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheridan, W. F., Avalkina, N. A., Shamrov, I. I., Batygina, T. B., Golubovskaya, I. N. (1996). The mac1 gene: controlling the commitment to the meiotic pathway in maize. Genetics 142, 1009–1020. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.3.1009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shirley, P., Doron, G. (2008). E2F - at the crossroads of life and death. Trends Cell Biol. 18, 528–535. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.08.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, M., Goel, S., Meeley, R. B., Dantec, C., Parrinello, H., Michaud, C., et al. (2011). Production of viable gametes without meiosis in maize deficient for an ARGONAUTE protein. Plant Cell 23, 443–458. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.079020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, Z. X., Zhao, L. H., Zhao, Y. Y., Li, S. F., Won, S., Cai, H. Y., et al. (2017). The THO complex non-cell-autonomously represses female germline specification through the TAS3-ARF3 module. Curr. Biol. 27, 1597–1609. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, T. (2010). Gibberellin-GID1-DELLA: a pivotal regulatory module for plant growth and development. Plant Physiol. 154, 567–570. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.161554

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, T. (2011). The molecular mechanism and evolution of the GA-GID1-DELLA signaling module in plants. Curr. Biol. 21, R338–R345. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tovar-Aguilar, A., Grimanelli, D., Acosta-García, G., Vielle-Calzada, J., Badillo-Corona, J., Durán-Figueroa, N. (2024). The miRNA822 loaded by ARGONAUTE9 modulates the monosporic female gametogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Reprod. 37, 243–258. doi: 10.1007/s00497-023-00487-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tucker, M. R., Okada, T., Hu, Y., Scholefield, A., Taylor, J. M., Koltunow, A. M. (2012). Somatic small RNA pathways promote the mitotic events of megagametogenesis during female reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Development 139, 1399–1404. doi: 10.1242/dev.075390

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Fowke, L. C., Crosby, W. L. (1997). A plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor gene. Nature 386, 451–452. doi: 10.1038/386451a0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C. J., Nan, G.-L., Kelliher, T., Timofejeva, L., Vernoud, V., Golubovskaya, I. N., et al. (2012). Maize multiple archesporial cells 1 (mac1), an ortholog of rice TDL1A, modulates cell proliferation and identity in early anther development. Development 139, 2594–2603. doi: 10.1242/dev.077891

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Webb, M. C., Gunning, B. E. S. (1990). Embryo sac development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sexual Plant Reprod. 3, 244–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00202882

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, B., Zhang, J., Pang, C., Yu, H., Guo, D., Jiang, H., et al. (2015). The molecular mechanism of SPOROCYTELESS/NOZZLE in controlling Arabidopsis ovule development. Cell Res. 25, 121–134. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.145

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, W., Alami, S., Luk, E., Wu, C., Sen, S., Mizuguchi, G., et al. (2005). Swc2 is a widely conserved H2AZ-binding module essential for ATP-dependent histone exchange. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 1064–1071. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, D., Duermeyer, L., Leoveanu, C., Nambara, E. (2014). The functions of the endosperm during seed germination. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 1521–1533. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu089

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, W., Sundaresan, V. (2000). Genetics of gametophyte biogenesis in Arabidopsis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3, 53–57. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(99)00037-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, W. C., Ye, D., Jian, X., Sundaresan, V. (1999). The SPOROCYTELESS gene of Arabidopsis is required for initiation of sporogenesis and encodes a novel nuclear protein. Genes Dev. 13, 2108–2117. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.16.2108

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, X. Z., Yang, H. D., Zhu, Y. X., Xue, J. S., Wang, T. H., Song, T., et al. (2018). The canonical E2Fs are required for germline development in arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 9. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00638

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, X., Romero-Campero, F., Reyes, P., Yan, P., Yang, J., Tian, G., et al. (2021). H2AK121ub in Arabidopsis associates with a less accessible chromatin state at transcriptional regulation hotspots. Nat. Commun. 12, 315. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20614-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoshikawa, M., Peragine, A., Park, M., Poethig, R. (2005). A pathway for the biogenesis of trans-acting siRNAs in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 19, 2164–2175. doi: 10.1101/gad.1352605

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, X. A., Bramsiepe, J., Van Durme, M., Komaki, S., Prusicki, M. A., Maruyama, D., et al. (2017). RETINOBLASTOMA RELATED1 mediates germline entry in Arabidopsis. Science 356, eaaf6532. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6532

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, L. H., Cai, H. Y., Su, Z. X., Wang, L. L., Huang, X. Y., Zhang, M., et al. (2018). KLU suppresses megasporocyte cell fate through SWR1-mediated activation of WRKY28 expression in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States America 115, E526–E535. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716054115

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Palma, J. D., Oane, R., Gamuyao, R., Luo, M., Chaudhury, A., et al. (2008). OsTDL1A binds to the LRR domain of rice receptor kinase MSP1, and is required to limit sporocyte numbers. Plant J. 54, 375–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03426.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, B., He, H., Zheng, Y., Wu, W., Sheila, M. (2014). An ARID domain-containing protein within nuclear bodies is required for sperm cell formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PloS Genet. 10, e1004421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004421

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Y., Li, G., Brandizzi, F., Fowke, L., Wang, H. (2003). The plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1 has distinct functional domains for in vivo kinase inhibition, protein instability and nuclear localization. Plant J. 35, 476–489. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01821.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: MMC, plant reproduction processes, epigenetic pathways, cell-cycle regulators, phytohormones

Citation: Huang Y, Zhang Y, Yang J, Xi X, Liu Y, Cai H and Qin Y (2025) Revisiting the female germline cell development. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1525729. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1525729

Received: 10 November 2024; Accepted: 20 December 2024;
Published: 14 January 2025.

Edited by:

Chong Wang, Shanghai Normal University, China

Reviewed by:

Ting Jiang, Fudan University, China
Xiujuan Yang, University of Adelaide, Australia

Copyright © 2025 Huang, Zhang, Yang, Xi, Liu, Cai and Qin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hanyang Cai, Y2FpaGFueWFuZzEyM0AxNjMuY29t; Yuan Qin, eXVhbnFpbkBmYWZ1LmVkdS5jbg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.