The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1499785
Revisiting the Emerging Pathosystem of Rice Sheath Blight: Deciphering the Rhizoctonia solani Virulence, Host Range, and Rice Genotype-based Resistance
Provisionally accepted- 1 Rice Pathology Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Sakha, Kafrelsheikh 33717, Egypt, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
- 2 Business Administration Department, Community College, King Khalid University, Guraiger, 62529, KSA, Guraiger, Saudi Arabia
- 3 Rice Research Department, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt., kafrelshiekh, Egypt
- 4 Department of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, AlAin, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- 5 Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, United States
- 6 Department of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt., Tanta, Egypt
Sheath blight, caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG1 IA, is a challenging disease of rice worldwide. In the current study, nine R. solani isolates, within the anastomosis group AG-1 IA, were isolated, characterized based on their macroscopic and microscopic features, as well as their ability to produce cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDEs), and further molecularly identified via ITS sequencing. Although all isolates were pathogenic and produced typical sheath blight symptoms the susceptible rice cultivar, Sakha 101, R. solani AG1 IA -isolate SHBP9 was the most aggressive isolate. The virulence of isolate SHBP9 was correlated with its overproduction of CWDEs, where it had the highest pectinase, amylase, and cellulase activity in vitro. R. solani AG1 IA -isolate SHBP9 was able to infect 12 common rice-associated weeds from the family Poaceae, as well as over 25 economic crops from different families, except chickpea (Cicer arietinum) from Fabaceae, Rocket (Eruca sativa) from Brassicaceae, and the four crops from Solanaceae.Additionally, rice genotype-based resistance was evaluated using 11 rice genotypes for their response to R. solani isolates, morphological traits, yield components, and using 12 SSR markers linked to sheath blight resistance. Briefly, the tested 11 rice genotypes were divided into three groups; Cluster "I" included only two resistant genotypes (Egyptian Yasmine and Giza 182), Cluster "II" included four moderately resistant genotypes (Egyptian hybrid 1, Giza 178, 181, and 183), whereas Cluster "III" included five susceptible (Sakha 104, 101, 108, Super 300 and Giza 177). Correspondingly, only surface-mycelium growth was microscopically noticed on the resistant cultivar Egyptian Yasmine, as well as the moderately resistant Egyptian hybrid 1, however, on the susceptible Sakha 104, the observed mycelium was branched, shrunk, and formed sclerotia. Accordingly, Indica and Indica/Japonica rice genotypes showed more resistance to R. solani than Japonica genotypes. These findings provide insights into its pathogenicity mechanisms and identify potential targets for disease control which ultimately contributes to the development of sustainable eco-friendly disease management strategies. Moreover, our findings might pave the way for developing resistant rice varieties by using more reliable resistance sources of non-host plants, as well as, rice genotype-based resistance as a genetic resource.
Keywords: Sheath blight, Rhizoctonia, Host range, Rice genotype, SSR marker, weeds, Cell Wall
Received: 21 Sep 2024; Accepted: 02 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Kalboush, Mazrou, Sherif, Gabr, Hassan, Ali and Nehela. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Amr A Hassan, Rice Pathology Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Sakha, Kafrelsheikh 33717, Egypt, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
Qurban Ali, Department of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, AlAin, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Yasser Nehela, Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.