Amita Kaundal
Anoop Kumar Srivastava
Dinesh Yadav- 1Plants, Soils, and Climate, College of Agriculture and Applied Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States
- 2Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR)-Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
- 3Department of Biotechnology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Editorial on the Research Topic
The role of the microbiome in plant and soil health in a changing climate
Industrialization during the mid-twentieth century drastically increased the earth’s temperature over the past few decades due to increased concentration of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide, by burning fossil fuels (Houghton, 2001). This rise in global temperature has led to extreme weather events worldwide, such as intense summers or harsh winters, and altered precipitation patterns, leading to prolonged droughts or severe floods (Ripple et al., 2022). The resulting environmental stress, a consequence of climate change, affects all living beings, including humans and plants. These stresses, especially the extreme heat and water conditions, negatively affect crop production and threaten food security (Ahmad et al., 2023). Soil salinity is another cause of concern due to elevated sea levels and extreme droughts (Munns and Tester, 2008; Sandhu and Kaundal, 2018). In nature, plants often face various stresses sequentially or simultaneously (Zandalinas and Mittler, 2022). Several studies reported the negative effect of combined environmental biotic and abiotic stresses on crop production and yield (Mahalingam, 2015; Ramegowda and Senthil-Kumar, 2015). The constant increase in world population, which is expected to reach 9 billion by 2050, demands an increase in food production by 70-85% (FAO, 2009). On top of that, anthropogenic activities and overuse of chemical fertilizers deteriorate soil health (Pahalvi et al., 2021; Santorufo et al., 2021). The root microbiome is one of the most diverse communities on the earth. It is mainly composed of rhizosphere microbes colonizing the immediate soil surrounding the plant root and endosphere microbes colonizing the internal tissues of the roots (Pascale et al., 2020; Bai et al., 2022) These microbes in the rhizosphere exhibit various plant growth-promoting activities such as nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore, catalase, and IAA production and help plants’ growth and development (Mohanty et al., 2021; Ganesh et al., 2024). The plant growth-promoting bacteria significantly mitigates environmental abiotic and biotic stresses (Beneduzi et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2019; Burlakoti et al., 2024).
The Research Topic, which has received diverse contributions, is a testament to the collaborative nature of scientific research. It is a collective effort to understand the role of the microbiome in plants and soil health in a changing climate, highlighting the role of soil microbes in mitigating salinity stress, drought, heavy metal toxicity, flooding, and elevated CO2. The first article suggested the potential of the cell-free supernatant in the novel Devosia sp. SL43 strain to sustain the soybean seed germination rate under salt stress (Monjezi et al.). Another study on soybean under elevated CO2 and flooding revealed higher bacterial and fungal diversity upon combined treatments compared to non-flooding control. The individual treatment of elevated CO2 and flooding revealed a significant abundance of Chitinophaga, Clostridium, and Bacillus. However, the combined treatments showed a considerable abundance of Trichoderma and Gibberella, offering hope for the future of plant and soil health in a changing climate (Coffman et al.). Another study focused is on phyllosphere epiphytic microbes’ diversity of five medicinal plants in summer and winter. The phyllosphere microbiome plays a significant role in plant physiological metabolism. The study revealed the seasonal effect on the bacterial and fungal phyllosphere compared to host species. The summer phyllosphere is more heterogeneous for microbial diversity than winter. The network connections of the bacterial and fungal communities significantly increased during season transition compared to plant connections. This study shed light on the understanding of the plant microbial community’s composition in small-scale agriculture and their ecological roles (He et al.). The article on the utilization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QST713-based product on potatoes revealed that this PGPB enhanced the potato yield and improved potato peel nutrient profile with a minor impact on the soil microbiome diversity (Adamo et al.). Another study on the PGPB revealed the biofertilizer and biocontrol properties of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BCM. This PGPB significantly increased the wheat seed germination rate in the presence of two phytopathogens, Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum, as well as saline conditions. Genomic analysis of S. maltophilia revealed the presence of genes known for nutrient assimilation plant growth promoting traits such as plant growth and antifungal activities (Sharma et al.). The report on the impact of two PGPBs, B. subtilis, and B. aryabhattai, on mitigating salt stress in rice revealed the potential of these isolates for sustainable agriculture in the era of climate change. PGPB treatment in rice during salt stress improved the ionic and water balance, antioxidation defense, photosynthesis, nutrient uptake, and phytohormone production (Siddika et al.).
Drought and salinity, often in tandem, are an important climate conundrum affecting crop growth and development due to ominous auxin imbalance as a function of microbial diversity. However, functional microbial diversity is more impactful than mere numerical diversity, the former undergoing lesser reduction in water scarcity under organic production practices than conventional practices with assured irrigation (del-Canto et al.). The study on Phaseolus vulgaris recommends organic management rather than using agrochemicals to maintain enhanced rhizobia abundance, nodulation, and diversity (del-Canto et al.). Efforts must be made to develop sustainable and eco-friendly approaches for preserving and strengthening soil microbiota biodiversity.
Further, it has been recommended that many microbes as auxin-producing endophytes are reported to neutralize drought and salinity through auxin balance with coordinated auxin biosynthesis involving plant-indigenous auxin, microbes-associated auxins, and carriers of auxin transporters, apart from upregulation of stress-induced auxin-responsive microbial genes (Mal and Panchal). The intervention of omics-driven research in understanding the action mechanism and interaction of plants and associated plant rhizobacteria has been nicely reviewed (Verma et al.). The revelation of omics-based adaptive regulatory mechanisms underlying the plant adaptation under microbes-mediated abiotic stress reduction with improved plant nutrition as the second line of plant defense has been reported (Verma et al.). In another review, the potential of plant growth-promoting microorganisms for salinity tolerance in plants has been elucidated (Acharya et al.). Interestingly, rhizosphere microbes, as the second genome, put forth stressing plant defense through the elevated supply of growth-promoting hormones such as auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinins, coupled with a reduced level of stress causing ethylene, thereby striking a balance osmoprotectant secretion and further oxidative cellular damage (Acharya et al.). An interesting review highlighting the microbial intervention in the remediation of heavy metal toxicity, emphasizing the mechanism involved, ensures better rhizosphere health resilience (Tang et al.). Further, attempts have been made to enlist diverse approaches, including the recent nanotechnology, to improve the microbial remediation of heavy metal-polluted soils.
While developing a combative strategy against drought and salinity, photobomb-induced soil legacy effects (developing functional bridge accommodating pathogenic microbes, antagonists, and repeated recruitment of fresh microbial diversity, all collectively surviving through competitive coexistence) featuring rhizosphere secretions, non-preferential salinity-tolerant microbes coupled with the use of halophytes are highly pivotal (Ma et al.).
In conclusion, this research topic has a significant collection of articles shedding light on the role of plants’ phyllosphere, rhizosphere, and endosphere microbiome in plant growth and development and soil health under critical environmental stresses.
Author contributions
AK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DY: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ahmad, Z., Ahmad, T., Abbasi, A., Waraich, E. A., Hina, A., Ishfaq, T., et al. (2023). “Climate change and global crop production,” in Climate-resilient agriculture, vol 1: crop responses and agroecological perspectives. Ed. Hasanuzzaman, M. (Springer International Publishing, Cham), 27–56. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-37424-1_2
Bai, B., Liu, W., Qiu, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Bai, Y. (2022). The root microbiome: Community assembly and its contributions to plant fitness. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 64, 230–243. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13226
Beneduzi, A., Ambrosini, A., Passaglia, L. M. P. (2012). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol. 35, 1044–51. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572012000600020
Burlakoti, S., Devkota, A. R., Poudyal, S., Kaundal, A. (2024). Beneficial plant–microbe interactions and stress tolerance in maize. Appl. Microbiol. 4, 1000–1015. doi: 10.3390/applmicrobiol4030068
FAO. (2009). FAO’s Director-general on how to feed the world in 2050 (Wiley Online Library).doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00312.x
Ganesh, J., Hewitt, K., Devkota, A. R., Wilson, T., Kaundal, A. (2024). IAA-producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from Ceanothus velutinus enhance cutting propagation efficiency and Arabidopsis biomass. Front. Plant Sci. 15. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1374877
Houghton, J. (2001). The science of global warming. Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 26, 247–257. doi: 10.1179/isr.2001.26.4.247
Kumar, A., Patel, J. S., Meena, V. S., Srivastava, R. (2019). Recent advances of PGPR based approaches for stress tolerance in plants for sustainable agriculture. Biocatal Agric. Biotechnol. 20, 101271. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101271
Mahalingam, R. (2015). “Consideration of combined stress: A crucial paradigm for improving multiple stress tolerance in plants,” in Combined stresses in plants: physiological, molecular, and biochemical aspects (Springer International Publishing), 1–26. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07899-1_1
Mohanty, P., Singh, P. K., Chakraborty, D., Mishra, S., Pattnaik, R. (2021). Insight into the role of PGPR in sustainable agriculture and environment. Front. Sustain Food Syst. 5. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.667150
Munns, R., Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
Pahalvi, H., Majeed, L., Rashid, S., Nisar, B., Kamili, A. (2021). Chemical fertilizers and their impact on soil health. (Springer). 1–20. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61010-4_1
Pascale, A., Proietti, S., Pantelides, I. S., Stringlis, I. A. (2020). Modulation of the root microbiome by plant molecules: the basis for targeted disease suppression and plant growth promotion. Front. Plant Sci. 10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01741
Ramegowda, V., Senthil-Kumar, M. (2015). The interactive effects of simultaneous biotic and abiotic stresses on plants: Mechanistic understanding from drought and pathogen combination. J. Plant Physiol. 176, 47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.11.008
Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Gregg, J. W., Levin, K., Rockström, J., Newsome, T. M., et al. (2022). World scientists’ Warning of a climate emergency 2022. Bioscience 72, 1149–1155. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biac083
Sandhu, D., Kaundal, A. (2018). “Dynamics of salt tolerance: molecular perspectives,” in Biotechnologies of crop improvement, volume 3: genomic approaches. Eds. Gosal, S. S., Wani, S. H. (Springer International Publishing, Cham), 25–40. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94746-4_2
Santorufo, L., Memoli, V., Panico, S. C., Esposito, F., Vitale, L., Di Natale, G., et al. (2021). Impact of anthropic activities on soil quality under different land uses. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168423
Keywords: microbiome, plant growth-promoting microbes, plant health, climate change, soil salinity, drought, heavy metal, elevated CO2
Citation: Kaundal A, Srivastava AK and Yadav D (2024) Editorial: The role of the microbiome in plant and soil health in a changing climate. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1491438. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1491438
Received: 04 September 2024; Accepted: 11 September 2024;
Published: 02 October 2024.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Maurizio Chiurazzi, National Research Council (CNR), ItalyCopyright © 2024 Kaundal, Srivastava and Yadav. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Amita Kaundal, amita.kaundal@usu.edu