Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1489380

Salt tolerance evaluation and key salt-tolerant traits at germination stage of upland cotton

Provisionally accepted
Mengjie An Mengjie An Xinhui Huang Xinhui Huang *Yilei Long Yilei Long *Yin Wang Yin Wang Yanping Tan Yanping Tan *Zhen Qin Zhen Qin *Xiantao Ai Xiantao Ai *Yan Wang Yan Wang *
  • Xinjiang University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uyghur Region, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Cotton is an important cash crop with a certain salt tolerance, but its germination stage is very susceptible to the damage of salt stress, causing significant yield loss. However, few studies have evaluated the cotton salt tolerance and selected salt tolerance traits at germination stage. Therefore, in this study, 16 cotton samples with geographical representation were randomly selected from 308 cotton germplasms to determine the optimal 200 mmol·L-1 NaCl in cotton germination experiments. On this basis, the salt tolerance of 308 upland cotton varieties and the growth, ion distribution and transport of highly salt-tolerant and non salt-tolerant cotton germplasms were analyzed. The results showed that the 308 germplasms were classified into five classes through cluster analysis, i..e, (1) highly salt-tolerant germplasms (HST, 49), (2) salt-tolerant germplasms (ST, 169), (3) moderately salt-tolerant class (MST,43), (4) lowly salt-tolerant germplasms (LST, 16), and (5) non-salt-tolerant germplasms (NST, 31). By calculating the salt tolerance index (STI) of various cotton germination and growth parameters and principal component analysis, combined with the correlation analysis and linear regression between mean membership function value (MFV) and STI, the key indexes of cotton germination and growth under salt stress, including total fresh weight, shoot fresh weight, and shoot length, were determined. In addition, three salt tolerance evaluation models constructed with different variables (6 variables in Model 1; 3 variables in Model 2; 1 variable in Model 3) found that the total fresh weight was the most reliable trait for the salt tolerance evaluation. In practical application, the variable selection for modelling could be adjusted based on the experimental workload. The comparison of the K+, Na+, and Ca2+ contents between HST and NST found that the higher the salt tolerance of cotton germplasms, the lower the Na+ content in the root system. Besides, the ion ratios and ion selective transport coefficients (ST) was found to be significantly positively correlated with the salt tolerance of cotton. This study will provide a basis for evaluating and breeding salt-tolerant cotton germplasms.

    Keywords: Salinization, Crop variety, Membership function, Ion content, Evaluation model

    Received: 01 Sep 2024; Accepted: 31 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 An, Huang, Long, Wang, Tan, Qin, Ai and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Xinhui Huang, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, Xinjiang Uyghur Region, China
    Yilei Long, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, Xinjiang Uyghur Region, China
    Yanping Tan, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, Xinjiang Uyghur Region, China
    Zhen Qin, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, Xinjiang Uyghur Region, China
    Xiantao Ai, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, Xinjiang Uyghur Region, China
    Yan Wang, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, Xinjiang Uyghur Region, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.