Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Crop and Product Physiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1472978
This article is part of the Research Topic Food-Energy-Water-Carbon-Nitrogen Nexus Mechanisms and Practices for Sustainable Crop Systems View all 5 articles

Environmental impacts and nitrogen-carbon-energy nexus of vegetable production in subtropical plateau lake basins

Provisionally accepted
Yousheng He Yousheng He 1Ruifeng Su Ruifeng Su 1Yuan Wang Yuan Wang 1Shunjin Li Shunjin Li 2Qi Huang Qi Huang 3Xinping Chen Xinping Chen 3Wei Zhang Wei Zhang 2Zhi Yao Zhi Yao 1*
  • 1 Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • 2 Southwest University, Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
  • 3 China Agricultural University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Vegetables are important economic crops globally, and their production has approximately doubled over the past 20 years. Globally, vegetables account for 13% of the harvested area but consume 25% of the fertilizer, leading to serious environmental impacts. However, the quantitative evaluation of vegetable production systems in subtropical plateau lake basins and the establishment of optimal management practices to further reduce environmental risks are still lacking. Using the life cycle assessment method, this study quantified the global warming, eutrophication, acidification, and energy depletion potential of vegetable production in a subtropical plateau lake basin in China based on data from 183 farmer surveys. Our results indicated that vegetable production in the study area, the Erhai Lake Basin, was high but came at a high environmental cost, mainly due to low fertilizer efficiency and high nutrient loss. Root vegetables have relatively high environmental costs due to the significant environmental impacts of fertilizer production, transportation, and application. A comprehensive analysis showed that the vegetable production in this region exhibited low economic and net ecosystem economic benefits, with ranges of 7.88-8.91 × 10 3 and 7.35-8.69 × 10 3 $ ha -1 , respectively. Scenario analysis showed that adopting strategies that comprehensively consider soil, crop, and nutrient conditions for vegetable production can reduce environmental costs (with reductions in global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), acidification potential (AP), and energy depletion potential (EDP) by 10. 6-28.2%, 65.1-73.5%, 64.5-71.9%, 47.8-70.4%, respectively) compared with the current practices of farmers. This study highlighted the importance of optimizing nutrient management in vegetable production based on farmers' practices, which can achieve more yield with less environmental impacts and thereby avoid the "trade-off" effect between productivity and environmental sustainability.

    Keywords: Subtropical, Plateau Lake basin, Environmental performance, Economic benefits, Life cycle assessment MS, agricultural materials stage, FS, farming stage, LCA, life cycle assessment, GWP, global warming potential, EP, eutrophication potential, AP, acidification potential, EDP, energy depletion potential, PFP, partial factor productivity of fertilizer

    Received: 30 Jul 2024; Accepted: 01 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 He, Su, Wang, Li, Huang, Chen, Zhang and Yao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Zhi Yao, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.