Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Functional Plant Ecology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1456877
This article is part of the Research Topic Dispersal Ecology of Land Plants: Striving Towards a More Universal Understanding View all 5 articles

Do sexes of a long-lived unisexual plant have different ecological niches?

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2 Département d'écologie et évolution, Faculté de Biologie et de Médecine, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
  • 3 Institute of Botany, University of Liege, Liege, Liege, Belgium

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Plant dispersal and reproduction are tightly associated, while the processes differ between plant lineages due to fundamental life cycle differences. In haploid-dominated plants, sex is manifested, and exposed to the environment, in the gametophyte. In the unisexual perennial moss Abietinella abietina, we asked whether pre-zygotic reproductive attributes in the gametophyte generation and their environmental drivers affect fertilization and thus, long-distance dispersal potential. We postulated a high proportion of non-sex-expressing samples, female gametophyte dominance, and that sporophyte formation depended on the mate distribution and environmental conditions. We expect the sexes to exhibit different topo-climate niches. Methods: We scored 1,080 herbarium specimens, representing individual species’ occurrences in Sweden, as sporophytic, phenotypically female or male, or non-sex expressing. We tested whether reproductive stage and sex ratios were related to latitude. We calculated topographic and climate (MPI, UKESM circulation models) niche differentiation, and modelled the response of sex expression and reproductive success to topo-climate factors. Results: Sixty-three percent of the samples bore sexual structures, 8% of females had sporophytes, and females outnumbered males. The female bias decreased from South to North, i.e., sex ratio increased, due to a higher probability of sex-expressing samples being male than females with increasing latitude. Topographic and climate niches did not differ between sexes, and the presence of sexual organs was not explained by ecological conditions. Sporophyte occurrence was predicted by precipitation and temperature factors and was confined to central Sweden. Discussion: Despite a high sex-expression level, sporophyte formation and thus, long-distance dispersal capacity, were rare and spatially strongly restricted. It depended on mate availability and macro-environmental factors related to moisture conditions. We infer that the distribution of reproductive morphs is governed by interactions between macro- and microscale environmental factors and biological traits. We suggest that traits and environmental conditions at the pre-zygotic stage have lower than expected effects on the overall distribution of this haploid-dominant plant. Modelling environmental data at higher resolution, smaller scale and expanding spatial coverage to include more sporophyte occurrences and comparing genetic diversity in sporophytic with non-sporophytic populations, are future lines of this research.

    Keywords: Abietinella abietina, Bioclimatic gradient, Niche modelling, Niche similarity, phenotypic sex ratio, Sexual Reproduction, topography, Sweden

    Received: 29 Jun 2024; Accepted: 20 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Bisang, Collart, Vanderpoorten and Hedenäs. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Irene Bisang, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.