Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1454569
This article is part of the Research Topic Salinity and Drought Stress in Plants: Understanding Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Responses Volume II View all 10 articles

Codonopsis pilosula Seedlings Drought-Responsive Key Genes and Pathways Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome

Provisionally accepted
Hongyan Wang Hongyan Wang 1*Yuan chen Yuan chen 2*Lanan Liu Lanan Liu 2,3*Fenxia Guo Fenxia Guo 1*Wei Laing Wei Laing 4Linlin Dong Linlin Dong 5Dong Pengbin Dong Pengbin 2Jiali Cheng Jiali Cheng 1Yongzhong Chen Yongzhong Chen 5*
  • 1 College of Agronomy, College of Life Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
  • 2 Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
  • 3 Guangxi Eco-engineering Vocational and Technical College, Nanning, China
  • 4 College of Agronomy, State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
  • 5 Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Backgroud Codonopsis pilosula (Campanulaceae) is a traditional herbal plant that is widely used in China, and the drought stress during the seedling stage directly affects the quality, ultimately impacting its yield. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the drought resistance of C. pilosula seedlings remain unclear. Method Herein, we conducted extensive comparative transcriptome and physiological studies on two distinct C. pilosula cultivars (G1 and W1) seedlings subjected to a four-day drought treatment. Results Our findings revealed that cultivar G1 exhibited enhanced retention of proline and chlorophyll, alongside a marked elevation in peroxidase activity, coupled with diminished levels of malondialdehyde and reduced leaf relative electrolyte leakage compared to the cultivar W1. This suggested cultivar G1 had relatively higher protective enzyme activity and ROS quenching capacity. We discerned a total of 21,535 expressed genes and identified 4,192 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Our analysis revealed that 1,764 DEGs unique to G1 and these DEGs underwent thorough annotation and functional categorization utilizing diverse databases. Under drought conditions, the DEGs in G1 were predominantly linked to starch and sucrose metabolic pathways, plant hormone signaling, and glutathione metabolism. Notably, the drought-responsive genes in G1 were heavily implicated in hormonal modulation, such as ABA receptor3-like gene (PYL9), regulation by transcription factors (KAN4, BHLH80, ERF1B), and the orchestration of drought-responsive gene expression. These results suggest that cultivar G1 possesses stronger stress tolerance and can better adapt to drought growing conditions. The congruence between qRT-PCR validation and RNA-seq data for fifteen DEGs further substantiated our findings. Conclusion Our research provides novel insights into the physiological adaptations of C. pilosula to arid conditions and lays the groundwork for the development of new, drought-tolerant C. pilosula cultivars.

    Keywords: Codonopsis pilosula, Drought stress, Differentially expressed genes, comparative transcriptome, qRT-PCR

    Received: 25 Jun 2024; Accepted: 07 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wang, chen, Liu, Guo, Laing, Dong, Pengbin, Cheng and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Hongyan Wang, College of Agronomy, College of Life Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
    Yuan chen, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
    Lanan Liu, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
    Fenxia Guo, College of Agronomy, College of Life Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
    Yongzhong Chen, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, Beijing Municipality, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.