Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Biotechnology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1447773
This article is part of the Research Topic Engineering Future Crops Through Genome Editing View all 4 articles

Crossing a CRISPR/Cas9 transgenic tomato plant with a wild-type plant yields diverse mutations in the F1 progeny

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 National Food Research Institute (NARO), Tsukuba, Japan
  • 2 Institute of Food Research, NARO, Tsukuba, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Generating CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutants in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) involves screening shoots regenerated from cultured cells transformed with a T-DNA harboring sequences encoding Cas9 and single guide RNAs (sgRNAs). Production of transformants can be inconsistent and obtaining transformants in large numbers may be difficult, resulting in a limited variety of mutations. Here, I report a method for generating various types of mutations from one transgenic plant harboring the CRISPR/Cas9 system. In this method, a wild-type plant was crossed with a T0 biallelic mutant expressing two sgRNAs targeting the RIPENING INHIBITOR (RIN) gene, and the resulting F1 seedlings were classified using a kanamycin resistance marker on the T-DNA. Genotyping of the RIN locus revealed that kanamycin-sensitive F1 seedlings, which carried no T-DNA, always harbored the wild-type allele and a mutant allele from the transgenic parent. Kanamycin-resistant F1 seedlings, which do carry the T-DNA, harbored a variety of novel mutant alleles, but not the wild-type allele, suggesting that it was mutated during crossing. The novel mutations included onebase insertions or short deletions at each target site, or large deletions across the two target sites. This method was also successfully applied to produce mutations in Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase 2 (GGPS2). Because this method involves crossing rather than transformation, it can be readily scaled up to produce numerous novel mutations, even in plant species or cultivars for which transformation is inefficient. Therefore, when initial transgene experiments fail to induce the desired mutation, this method provides additional opportunities for generating mutants.

    Keywords: CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)/Cas9 (CRISPR associated protein 9)-mediated genome editing, Tomato, RIN (ripening inhibitor), Mutagenesis, GGPS2

    Received: 12 Jun 2024; Accepted: 23 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ito. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Yasuhiro Ito, National Food Research Institute (NARO), Tsukuba, Japan

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.