Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Breeding
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1439547

Transcriptional and genetic characteristic of chimera pea generation via double ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutation revealed by transcription analysis

Provisionally accepted
Baolong Liu Baolong Liu 1*Jinglei Hu Jinglei Hu 1Mingxia Liu Mingxia Liu 2Dongxia Wang Dongxia Wang 2Yunlong Liang Yunlong Liang 1Yuan Zong Yuan Zong 1Yun Li Yun Li 1Dong Cao Dong Cao 1
  • 1 Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Xining, China
  • 2 Qinghai University, Xining, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-induced mutagenesis is a prominent method for generating plant mutants, often resulting in chimera plants; however, their transcriptional and genetic characteristic remain elusive. In this investigation, chimera pea (Pisum sativum L.) specimens, labeled GY1 and GY2, exhibiting a distinctive phenotype with yellow and green leaves were meticulously cultivated via sequential double EMS mutagenesis. The observed color disparity between the yellow and green leaves was attributed to a significant reduction in chlorophyll content coupled with heightened lutein levels in both chimeric variants. Transcriptome profiling revealed the enrichment of differentially expressed genes in both GY1 and GY2, specifically implicating Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways linked to amino acid biosynthesis and ribosome development, alongside Gene Ontology (GO) biological processes linked with stress response mechanisms. Few structural genes associated with chlorophyll and lutein biosynthesis exhibited discernible differential expression. Despite these functional similarities, distinctive nuances were evident between specimens, with GY1 exhibiting enrichment in GO pathways related to chloroplast development and GY2 showing enrichment for ribosome development pathways. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis uncovered a shared pool of 599 and 598 polymorphisms in the yellow and green leaves of GY1 and GY2, respectively, likely stemming from the initial EMS mutagenesis step. Further investigation revealed an increased number of unique SNPs in the yellow leaves following the second EMS application, whereas the green leaves exhibited sparse and unique SNP occurrences, suggestive of potential evasion from secondary mutagenesis. This inherent genetic variability underpins the mechanism underlying the formation of chimera plants. Predominant base mutations induced by EMS were characterized by G/A and C/T transitions, constituting 74.1% of the total mutations, aligning with established EMS mutation induction paradigms. Notably, genes encoding the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIIso4G and the ubiquitin ligase RKP, known to modulate leaf color in model plants, harbored two SNPs in the yellow leaves of both GY1 and GY2, implicating their putative role in the yellow leaf phenotype. Collectively, this study provides novel insights into the transcriptional and genetic characteristics of chimera plants via EMS-induced mutagenesis.

    Keywords: Pisum sativum, Chimera, EMS mutation, Transcriptome, SNP

    Received: 28 May 2024; Accepted: 13 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Liu, Hu, Liu, Wang, Liang, Zong, Li and Cao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Baolong Liu, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Xining, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.