Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1415628

Comparative transcriptomics of a generalist aphid, Myzus persicae and a specialist aphid, Lipaphis erysimi reveals molecular signatures associated with diversity of their feeding behaviour and other attributes

Provisionally accepted
Manvi Sharma Manvi Sharma 1Praveen K. Oraon Praveen K. Oraon 1Rubina Chongtham Rubina Chongtham 2Shailendra Goel Shailendra Goel 1Manu Agarwal Manu Agarwal 1Arun Jagannath Arun Jagannath 1*
  • 1 Department of Botany, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
  • 2 Department of Botany, Deshbandhu College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Aphids are phloem sap-sucking insects and are a serious destructive pest of several crop plants. Aphids are categorized as "generalists" or "specialists" depending on their host range. Myzus persicae (Sulz.) is a generalist aphid with a broad host range while Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.), a specialist aphid, has a narrow host range. Aphid infestation involves several sequential stages including host recognition and selection, overcoming primary plant defence barriers, feeding on phloem sap and detoxification of host defence responses. Information on the molecular basis of variations between generalist and specialist aphids with reference to the above processes is limited. In the current study, we generated transcriptome data and analysed the differential expression of genes between M. persicae and L. erysimi in adult and nymph stages of development. Gene expression studies identified 7688 and 8194 differentially expressed unigenes at adult and nymph stages, respectively of M. persicae and L. erysimi. M. persicae showed significantly higher levels of expression in a greater number of unigenes (5112 in adults and 5880 in nymphs) in contrast to the specialist, L. erysimi in both developmental stages. In addition, M. persicae displayed a greater number (350 in adults and 331 in nymphs) of upregulated unigenes involved in important processes such as host recognition, plant cell wall degradation, detoxification, digestion and metabolism, which correlate with its dynamic and polyphagous nature in contrast to the specialist. Analysis of our transcriptome data for effector molecules, which facilitate the process of feeding and/or modulate host response against herbivory, led to the identification of several effectors which are being reported for the first time in our study. We observed a greater number of putative effectors in M. persicae (948 in adults and 283 in nymphs) than L. erysimi (797 in adults and 245 in nymphs). Based on our analysis, we conclude that the generalist aphid, M. persicae has a more diversified and stronger arsenal of genes that influence its polyphagous feeding behaviour and effective response to plant defence mechanisms against insect-herbivory. Our study provides a compendium of such candidate genes that would be most useful in studies on aphid biology, evolution and control.

    Keywords: Aphids, Generalist, Specialist, Transcriptome, differential expression, Effectors

    Received: 10 Apr 2024; Accepted: 21 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Sharma, Oraon, Chongtham, Goel, Agarwal and Jagannath. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Arun Jagannath, Department of Botany, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.