James Kisaakye1*
Dennis Beesigamukama1*
Solveig Haukeland1,2
Sevgan Subramanian1
Paul K. Thiongo1
Segenet Kelemu1
Chrysantus M. Tanga1*- 1International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya
- 2Division of Biotechnology and Plant Health, Norwegian Institute for Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Ås, Norway
Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are serious pests of most food crops, causing up to 100% yield loss. Nevertheless, commercial nematicides are costly and harmful to the environment. While the nematicidal potential of crustacean and synthetic chitin has been demonstrated globally, research on the potential of insect-derived chitin for nematode control has received limited attention. Here, seven chitin-fortified black soldier fly frass fertilizer extracts (chFE) were assessed for their suppressiveness of Meloidogyne incognita and impacts on spinach growth in comparison with a commercial nematicide using in vitro and in vivo bioassays. The performance of chFE and control treatments was assessed by determining their effects on nematode egg hatchability; infective juvenile (J2) mortality and paralysis; number of galls, egg masses, and J2s per plant; and spinach root and shoot biomass. In vitro results showed that chFE and commercial nematicide suppressed nematode egg hatchability by 42% and 52%, respectively, relative to the control (sterile distilled water). Up to 100% paralysis was achieved when M. incognita J2s were exposed to either chFE or commercial nematicide. Further, the J2 mortality achieved using chFE (95%) was comparable to the value achieved using commercial nematicide (96%); in all treatments, mortality increased with exposure time. Similarly, up to 85% suppression of gall development was achieved when spinach plants were grown in soil drenched with chFE; up to 79% reduction in egg mass formation and 68% suppression of J2 development in the root system were achieved using chFE. Also, chFE application significantly increased spinach root and shoot biomass by 54%–74% and 39%–58%, respectively, compared to commercial nematicide. Our findings demonstrate the nematicidal potential of chFE and its benefits on crop production. Thus, chFE could be considered as a promising multipurpose, regenerative, and cost-effective input for sustainable management of plant-parasitic nematodes and enhancement of crop yield.
1 Introduction
Root-knot nematodes (RKNs; Meloidogyne spp.) are a polyphagous group of plant-parasitic nematodes that parasitize most, if not all, cultivated crops. While RKNs have global economic importance, their impact is greater in the tropics (Maurice et al., 2010; Sikora et al., 2018). The four most important species are the tropical M. incognita, M. arenaria and M. javanica, and the temperate M. hapla (Maurice et al., 2010; Onkendia et al., 2014). Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica and M. hapla possess the highest rate of global spread among other crop pests and pathogens (Bebber et al., 2014), with M. incognita reported to be the most damaging within the genera (Maurice et al., 2010; Ralmi et al., 2016). The second stage juvenile (J2) is the infective stage, which penetrates the root, usually behind the tip, and moves through the root to establish and develop a lifelong feeding site. The feeding site contains a few metabolically active multi-nucleate giant cells, located close to the vascular bundles, and provides constant nourishment to the developing female (Abad et al., 2010; Jones and Goto, 2011). Consequently, water and nutrient uptake by the host plant is substantially reduced, leading to compromised plant growth and a significant reduction in yield (Wesemael et al., 2011; Coyne et al., 2018a). Up to 100% yield loss has been attributed to RKN infection, especially in high-value crops, which manifests as a decline in the quality and/or quantity of the produce, and increased production costs (Trudgill et al., 2000; Wesemael et al., 2011; Onkendia et al., 2014). Disease complexes with other pathogens such as Ralstonia solanacearum, Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum species complex, and Thielaviopsis basicola have also been reported (Manzanilla-López and Starr, 2010), an indication of the continued need to develop more effective and sustainable management strategies against this pest.
Several methods have been recommended for the management and control of RKN infection; these include the use of botanicals and chemical nematicides, crop rotation, resistant varieties and biological control (Perry et al., 2010; Onkendia et al., 2014; Ralmi et al., 2016). Traditionally, farmers have mostly relied on the use of chemical nematicides like the soil fumigant methyl bromide, while a majority of farmers, especially in the tropics, practice farming without implementing any RKN management strategies. Unfortunately, the use of most chemical nematicides has been discouraged or banned due to growing concerns about human, animal and environmental safety (WHO, 2020), requiring alternative user- and eco-friendly management strategies.
Chitin is a natural polysaccharide that occurs as a structural component in most insect pupal exuviae and crustacean shells. However, chitosan is a deacetylated derivative of chitin. Deacetylation of chitin to chitosan can be achieved through chemical or biological means (Schmitz et al., 2019; Santos et al., 2020). Both chitin and chitosan have gained attention for use in different sectors including agriculture (Sharp, 2013; Grégorio and Lichtfouse, 2019; Shamshina et al., 2020; Kemboi et al., 2022). This is attributed to their exceptional properties, which include biodegradability, biocompatibility, non-toxicity and antimicrobial activity (El Knidri et al., 2018; Lagat et al., 2021).
The black soldier fly (BSF; Hermetia illucens) is a two-winged wasp-like fly belonging to the family Stratiomyidae. It is native to the tropics and has spread to the subtropical and temperate regions of the world (Diclaro and Kaufman, 2012). The fly undergoes complete metamorphosis, with the entire lifecycle lasting between 40 and 43 days (Tomberlin et al., 2002). The BSF larvae are efficient bio-waster recyclers, capable of consuming all types of organic waste. As they feed, the BSF larvae leave behind a mass of excreta and unconsumed organic matter, collectively referred to as frass (BSFF), which contains a substantial amount of nutrients (Lalander et al., 2015). After approximately 14 days of feeding, the larvae pupate and turn into dark-colored non-feeding pupa covered in an exoskeleton, from which the adult fly emerges, leaving behind the chitin-rich dark-colored pupal shell, also called BSF exuviae (BSFE).
The chemical extraction of chitin from BSF exuviae requires the use of bases and acids such as sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid for the deproteinization and demineralization processes, respectively (Radwan et al., 2012; Abidin et al., 2020). However, the acids and bases used for chemical extraction are costly, hazardous to the environment, non-biodegradable and can affect the physicochemical properties of the final product (Tan et al., 2020). Conversely, microbial extraction of chitin from BSF exuviae has been demonstrated, and the concentrations have been determined. Moreover, in addition to utilizing eco-friendly microbes, the method compromises neither the quality nor quantity of the extracted chitin (Lagat et al., 2021).
While the nematicidal potential of crustacean and synthetic chitin has been studied (Radwan et al., 2012; Mota and dos Santos, 2016; Zhan et al., 2021), information regarding the potential of using insect-derived chitin for nematode control is very limited. Thus, this study was conducted to assess the potential of microbially extracted chitin from BSF (H. illucens) frass and pupal exuviae against the root-knot nematode M. incognita under in vitro and greenhouse conditions.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts
Black solder fly frass and BSFE, generated from BSF, effective microorganisms (EMs), biochar and molasses, were used in the fermentation process to generate chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts (chFE). Black soldier fly frass and BSFE were obtained from a BSF colony maintained at the Animal Rearing and Containment Unit (ARCU) of the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya. The BSFs were reared on a mixture of potato peelings, fruits and vegetable waste, following a standard rearing procedure (Shumo et al., 2019; Beesigamukama et al., 2021). The BSFF obtained was milled into a fine powder (≤0.5 mm) using a hammer mill. The BSFE were washed in tap water, sun-dried to achieve a moisture content of ≤10%, and milled into a fine powder (≤0.5 mm). Biochar was obtained from Safi Organics Ltd., Mwea, Kenya, while molasses was sourced from an agrovet shop in Thika, Kenya. The EM culture was sourced from EM Technologies Ltd., Embu, Kenya, and contained the following active microorganisms: lactic acid-producing bacteria; Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus casei, photosynthetic bacteria; Rhodopseudomonas palustris, protease-producing bacteria; Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis, yeast; and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
The BSFF and BSFE were mixed in varying proportions to form seven treatments with 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, and 10% chitin composition and were denoted as E0, E10, E20, E30, E40, E50 and E100, respectively (Table 1). The quantity of chitin was estimated based on its composition in BSFE following biological extraction using B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, and L. plantarum (Lagat et al., 2021). The mixed solid materials (BSFF, BSFE and biochar) were placed in bags made of charmeuse fabric; the bags measured 35 × 70 cm (diameter × height). The bags were tightly sealed and individually placed in 50-L non-transparent plastic fermentation tanks, and each tank was filled with 40 L of a premixed solution of molasses, EMs and water (1:4:195, v/v/v) (Table 1). The tanks were tightly covered with a lid fitted with a 5-mm-diameter tube to allow for gaseous exchange. The contents were fermented for 6 weeks with weekly stirring to obtain mature and stable chFE. The maturity and stability of frass fertilizer extracts were determined following previously described procedures (Bernal et al., 2017; Beesigamukama et al., 2021). After fermentation, the chFE were sieved through a 150-µm sieve (Endecotts Ltd., London, UK), put into 20-L non-transparent jerrycans, and stored in a cool place pending bioassay experiments. Prior to use in the bioassay experiments, approximately 45 mL of chFE was placed in 50-mL Falcon tubes and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was collected into 50-mL Falcon tubes ready for use in the bioassays (Figure 1).
Table 1 Composition of treatments used in the composting and extraction of chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts (chFE).
Figure 1 Schematic presentation of methodology used in preparation of chitin-fortified black soldier fly frass fertilizer extracts (chFE) and bioassays.
2.2 Nematode eggs and infective juveniles
Meloidogyne sp. nematodes were isolated from infested tomato roots collected from the National Youth Service (NYS), Yatta Agricultural Farm, Machakos, Kenya. Single egg masses were picked from the galled tomato roots using a stereo microscope (Leica M80, Leica Microsystems, Teban Gardens Crescent, Singapore) and used to establish pure cultures of M. incognita, which were used in this study. The identity of M. incognita was established using the perennial pattern of mature females (Taylon et al., 1956). Prior to use in this study, the nematode inoculum was multiplied on tomato plants (cv. money maker) in 2-L pots containing steam-sterilized soil in the screen house at icipe, Nairobi, Kenya.
To generate nematode eggs, heavily galled tomato plants (approx. 2 months old) were uprooted, and the roots were gently washed with tap water and cut into ca. 1-cm pieces. The cut root pieces were then placed in a 300-mL conical flask and completely covered with 0.6% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution. The conical flask was shaken vigorously for 5 minutes to dissolve the gelatinous matrix and free the eggs. The contents of the conical flask were then poured through a 250-µm sieve and placed over a 25-µm sieve (Endecotts Ltd.). The collected eggs on the 25-µm sieve were quickly washed with running tap water to remove all the NaOCl, with a final rinse performed using sterile distilled water, and the eggs were collected in 15-mL Falcon tubes (Coyne and Ross, 2014) ready for use in the egg hatchability assay. A portion of the collected eggs were hatched using the modified Baermann funnel technique (Hallmann and Subbotin, 2018) at 25°C–27°C for 5–7 days; the hatched J2s were used in the in vitro and in planta bioassays and the assessment of infective juvenile paralysis and mortality.
2.3 In vitro bioassays
2.3.1 Egg hatching assay
Prior to assessing the antagonism of chFE against M. incognita eggs, the nematode eggs were quantified using a stereo microscope, and their density was adjusted to 1,000 eggs per mL. A 10% dilution of each chFE was prepared using sterile distilled water, and 1 mL of each dilution was separately transferred into each well of the 24 multi-cell culture plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Velum® Prime (Bayer Crop Science, Cambridge, UK) at a volume of 1 mL, diluted as per the manufacturer’s recommendation, was used as a commercial nematicide, while sterile distilled water was used as the control. Approximately 100 M. incognita eggs, contained in 0.1 mL suspension, were added to each well. The eggs were incubated in the treatments for 48 hours; thereafter, the treatment solution was carefully pipetted off. Pipetting of the treatment solution was performed under a stereo microscope, and care was taken not to suck up any eggs or hatched nematodes. Thereafter, sterile distilled water (1 mL) was added to each well, and the eggs were incubated on the laboratory bench for 15 days. Twenty replicate wells were set up for each treatment, and the number of emerged J2s was counted at 3-day intervals for 15 days. At each time point, four wells were randomly selected from each treatment, the contents of the wells were transferred onto a 2-mL De Grisse counting dish (De Grisse, 1963), and the number of hatched and unhatched eggs was quantified using a stereo microscope (Figure 1). The experiment was repeated once in time.
2.3.2 M. incognita infective juvenile paralysis and mortality assay
Approximately 100 freshly hatched J2 suspension (0.1 mL) was transferred into each well of the 24 multi-cell culture plates, and either diluted chFE or commercial nematicide (1 mL) was added. Sterile distilled water was used as the control. Each treatment was replicated 16 times, and the setup was incubated on the laboratory bench for 24 hours in a completely randomized design. Nematode paralysis and mortality were assessed at 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours post treatment application. At each time point, four replicates of the same treatment were randomly selected, and the nematodes were washed with sterile distilled water and then assessed for paralysis. Nematodes were recorded as paralyzed if they appeared straight and non-motile. A similar bioassay was set up to assess nematode mortality, where nematodes were considered dead if they failed to move after probing with a fine needle (Figure 1). The bioassays were repeated twice.
2.4 Nematicidal efficacy in spinach plants
In planta efficacy of chFE was evaluated using spinach plants (cv. Fordhook giant). Four-week-old seedlings were individually transplanted into 2-L pots filled with a steam-sterilized potting mixture of loam soil and fine sand (3:1). The pots were maintained in a greenhouse. One week after transplanting, each pot was inoculated with a 2 mL suspension of M. incognita (1,000 J2s) (Coyne and Ross, 2014). One day after infection with J2s, three dilutions (25%, 50% and 100%; v/v) of each chFE were prepared. Each pot was treated by drenching with 100 mL of either chFE or commercial nematicide. Commercial nematicide was diluted as per the manufacturer’s guidelines, while control plants were drenched with tap water (Figure 2). Six replicate pots were used for each treatment, with the treatments arranged in a completely randomized design, and the experiment was conducted twice. The treatments were applied biweekly, and the experiment was terminated 7 weeks after nematode inoculation.
Figure 2 Schematic presentation of methodology used in in planta bioassay used to assess the efficacy of chitin-fortified black soldier fly frass fertilizer extracts (chFE) against Meloidogyne incognita infection of spinach plants.
At experiment termination, the plants were carefully removed from the pots, and the roots were gently rinsed using tap water to remove all adhering soil and then blotted dry using tissue paper. The roots were cut from the shoot, and the root and shoot fresh weights were recorded. The roots were scored for root galling using the index described by Coyne and Ross (2014); furthermore, the number of galls per plant root system was recorded. The egg masses were stained by soaking the roots in phloxin B solution (0.1%) for 15 minutes, followed by rinsing in tap water. The egg masses were counted, the roots were chopped into ca. 1-cm pieces, and J2s were extracted using the modified Baerman techniques (Coyne et al., 2018b) over a 14-day period. Nematode suspensions were collected from the extraction plates once every 2 days and kept in the fridge (4°C–6°C), and fresh water was added to the extraction plate. For each treatment replicate, the extracted J2s were consolidated over the 14-day extraction period prior to quantification.
2.5 Data analysis
Due to the binary nature of egg hatchability data (hatched vs. unhatched) and nematode paralysis data (paralyzed vs. non-paralyzed), the data were fitted using generalized linear models (GLMs) with binomial distribution to determine the main effects of experiment repeat, treatment, exposure time, and the interaction effects. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (log-rank method) was performed on nematode mortality data using the R package “survival” (Therneau, 2022) to assess if the proportion of dead J2s was influenced by experiment repeat, treatment, and exposure time. At 24 hours post exposure of J2s to treatment, the proportion of dead nematodes was fitted using a GLM with binomial distribution to check for the ultimate effect of treatment on nematode mortality. Median lethal times (LT50) were determined using the “dose.p” function of the package “MASS” (Brian et al., 2021). LT50 values were determined only for treatment repeats that yielded >50% nematode mortality. The LT50 values were fitted using a GLM with Gaussian distribution to check for the effect of treatment.
In the experiment to assess in planta efficacy of chFE against M. incognita infection of spinach plants, data on plant growth (shoot and root fresh weight) were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) to investigate the main and interaction effects of experiment repeat, chFE and concentration treatments. Prior to ANOVA, data on root weight were square root-transformed to conform to the requirements for normality (Shapiro and Wilk, 1965) and homogeneity of variances (O’Neill and Mathews, 2002). No transformation was performed on shoot weight data. Data on galling index, number of galls, egg masses and J2s per plant root system were fitted to GLM with Gaussian distribution to check the effects and interactions between experiment repeat, chFE and concentration treatments. The significance of the GLM models was established using an analysis of deviance (Wald chi-square test) followed by computation of least-square means using the “emmeans” package (Lenth, 2022), and group means were separated using Tukey’s [honestly significant difference (HSD)] multiple comparisons using the “cld” function of the “multcomp” package (Hothorn et al., 2021). All data analyses were performed using R (Version 4.2.2) statistical software (R Core Team, 2022), with statistical significance noted at p < 0.05.
3 Results
3.1 Effect of chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts on egg hatchability
Overall, the proportion of hatched eggs in experiment 2 (53%) was significantly higher than in experiment 1 (49%). Similarly, egg hatchability was significantly influenced by treatment and time of exposure. Apart from the significant interaction recorded between treatment and time of exposure, all other interactions were non-significant. Consequently, data were pooled across experiment repeats prior to further analysis. Exposure of nematode eggs to commercial nematicide and chFE significantly inhibited egg hatchability compared to the control. Furthermore, the proportion of hatched eggs increased with time across all treatments (Figure 3).
Figure 3 Suppression of hatchability of Meloidogyne incognita eggs upon exposure to chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts for 48 hours and incubation in sterile distilled water over a 15-day period. Data pooled across two experiments.
At day 15 post treatment, the suppression in egg hatchability achieved by chFE (47%–55%) and commercial nematicide (63%) was significantly higher than that in the control (23%) (Figure 4). However, the chFE E30, E40, E50 and E100 exhibited suppression of nematode egg hatchability like that of commercial nematicide (Figure 3).
Figure 4 Violin plots showing suppression of Meloidogyne incognita egg hatch at 15 days post exposure to chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts. Plots followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different. Means separated by Tukey’s [honestly significant difference (HSD)] test at p < 0.05. Data pooled across two experiments.
3.2 Effect of chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts on paralysis of M. incognita infective juveniles
All the seven chFE products and the commercial nematicide paralyzed M. incognita J2s. Percentage nematode paralysis was not influenced by experiment repeat. However, this varied across treatments and time of exposure, with a significant interaction between treatment and exposure time. Consequently, data were pooled across experiments prior to further analysis. Overall, nematode paralysis increased with increased exposure to the treatment. Similarly, nematode paralysis was significantly higher in the chFE and commercial nematicide treatments compared to the control at each of the four time points. While the commercial nematicide had significantly higher nematode paralysis at 6 and 12 hours compared to chFE, this was not observed at 3 and 24 hours post exposure (Table 2).
Table 2 Percentage paralysis of Meloidogyne incognita infective juveniles at 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours post exposure to chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts (chFE).
3.3 Nematicidal effect of chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts on M. incognita infective juveniles
The chFE possessed antagonistic activity against M. incognita J2s, which varied with time. As time progressed, the proportion of dead nematodes increased with a significant difference across the treatments (Figure 5). The mortality rate for the chFE-treated nematodes was higher than that of the control but lower than that of the commercial nematicide.
Figure 5 Cumulative mortality of Meloidogyne incognita infective juveniles (J2s) at 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours post exposure to chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts.
At 24 hours post nematode exposure to treatment, nematode mortality did not vary between experiments; however, there was a significant effect of treatment but no interaction of experiment and treatment. Nematode mortality due to chFE was 15–16-fold higher than that of the control and statistically similar to that of the commercial nematicide (Figure 6).
Figure 6 Violin plots showing percentage mortality of Meloidogyne incognita infective juveniles (J2s) at 24 hours post exposure to chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts. Plots followed by the same letter indicate no significant difference. Means separated by Tukey’s [honestly significant difference (HSD)] test at p < 0.05. Data pooled across two experiments.
While the median lethal time (LT50) in experiment 1 (11.99 hours) was significantly lower than in experiment 2 (12.47 hours) and was significantly influenced by treatment, there was no significant interaction between the experiment and treatment. Thus, LT50 data were pooled across experiments prior to further analysis. Overall, the commercial nematicide recorded the least LT50 (6.01 hours), which was lower than that of chFE. In contrast, among the chFE products, E100 recorded the lowest LT50 (12.26 hours), which was significantly lower than that of E0 (13.91 hours) (Figure 7). Nematode mortality in the control was <50%; hence, no LT50 values were estimated.
Figure 7 Violin plots describing median lethal time (LT50) of Meloidogyne incognita infective juveniles (J2s) exposed to chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts. Plots with same letter(s) indicate no significant difference. Means separated by Tukey’s [honestly significant difference (HSD)] test at p < 0.05. Data pooled across two experiments.
3.4 Efficacy of chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts in spinach plants
3.4.1 Plant growth
There was no significant effect of the experiment repeat on either root weight or shoot weight. Apart from E100, drenching the soil with chFE at a 25% dilution rate significantly boosted spinach plant root growth by ≥57% compared to untreated control. Similarly, soil drenching with E0 and E10 at either 25% or 50% dilution rates significantly improved spinach shoot weight by ≥42% relative to untreated control. At dilution rates of 25% and 50%, chFE application significantly increased spinach root (E0, E10 and E20) and shoot (E0, E10 and E30) biomass by 54%–74% and 39%–58%, respectively, compared to the commercial nematicide (Table 3).
Table 3 Growth of spinach plants cv. Fordhook giant at 7 weeks post infection with 1000 Meloidogyne incognita infective juveniles and drenching with chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts (chFE) at 25, 50 and 100% dilution rates.
3.4.2 Nematode infection
All the nematode infection parameters (galling index, number of galls, egg masses and infective juveniles) were not significantly influenced by experiment repeat. Similarly, the galling index was not influenced by treatment. However, soil drenching with E20, E30, E40, E50 and E100 at 50% and 100% dilution rates significantly suppressed gall formation in spinach plants by 44%–79%, which was not significantly different from the suppression achieved by the commercial nematicide (85%) (Figure 8). Apart from plants grown in soil drenched with E0 and E10 at 25% and 50% dilution, or E20 at 25% dilution, all other chFE treatments significantly suppressed egg mass numbers by 43%–75%, which was similar to suppression achieved by commercial nematicide (79%) (Figure 8). Save for nematode densities from plants grown in soil drenched with E0, E10 and E20 at 25% dilution (≥2,416 J2s per plant), the number of nematodes (≤2,196 J2s per plant) recovered from roots of plants grown in soil drenched other chFE treatments and dilutions was significantly lower than that of control plants (2,384 J2s per plant) (Figure 8).
Figure 8 Boxplots illustrating nematicidal effect of chitin-fortified frass fertilizer extracts (chFE) on Meloidogyne incognita infection of spinach plants cv. Fordhook giant at 7 weeks post infection with 1,000 infective juveniles. chFE applied at 25%, 50% and 100% dilution rates. For each parameter, boxplots with different letter(s) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. Data pooled across two experiments (n = 12). Bar in each box indicates the median, while bars at the extremes of the boxes indicate the 25th–75th percentiles. The ends of box whiskers indicate minimum and maximum of the data points.
4 Discussion
In this study, we present the first report demonstrating the potential of using microbially extracted chitin from BSF pupal exuviae in the management of the RKN M. incognita. In our study, all the tested chFE inhibited M. incognita egg hatchability, achieving up to 42% reduction in hatchability at 15 days post exposure, relative to control. Similar to our findings, inhibition of RKN egg hatchability upon exposure to chitin or its derivatives has been reported (Fan et al., 2019; Zhan et al., 2021) and indicates the potential of insect-derived chitin as a sustainable alternative for nematode management.
The mechanism of egg hatch inhibition by chitin may be related to the influx of toxic compounds through the nematode eggshell upon contact with chitin contained in the chFE or the deterioration of the nematode eggshell leading to in situ mortality of the unhatched juveniles (Mota and dos Santos, 2016; Göze Özdemir et al., 2022). In our study, we observed no difference in the inhibition of egg hatchability between the commercial nematicide and the chFE E30, E40, E50 and E100 at 15 days post exposure, an indication that chFE with ≥3% chitin composition is optimal for suppressing M. incognita egg hatchability, and thus, chFE could be a potential and environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic nematicides.
While antagonism of the chFE slightly increased with an increase in the proportion of BSFE inclusion, the chFE product E0, which was extracted from BSFF alone, also suppressed egg hatchability and caused both paralysis and mortality of J2s. These findings align with previous studies that have reported the antimicrobial and pesticidal activities of BSFF (Bloukounon-Goubalan et al., 2021; Lagat et al., 2021; Abiya et al., 2022; Barragán-Fonseca et al., 2022; Kemboi et al., 2022). Furthermore, the observed antagonism of E0 could be attributed to the fact that the BSFF is not completely devoid of BSFE; hence, the residual BSFE could have broken down into chitin during fermentation, thus causing the antagonism. Additionally, the biological breakdown of organic matter produces nitrogen, especially ammonium nitrogen (Beesigamukama et al., 2020a, 2021), which has been shown to contribute to the nematode suppressiveness of both solid and liquid composts (Oka and Yermiyahu, 2002).
Thus, in the long run, the use of chFE would be a more sustainable and cost-effective intervention for M. incognita management. Nevertheless, the LT50 (12.26 hours) exhibited by E100 compared to other chFE (LT50 ≥ 12.76 hours) is an indication of the role played by chitin in improving the in vitro nematicidal potential of chFE.
Overall, while the commercial nematicide had the shortest median lethal time, killing 50% of the J2s in 6 hours, it should be noted that chFE is a multipurpose product. In fact, apart from E100, our study revealed that chFE, applied at a 25% dilution rate, improved root growth and development of spinach in pots. Furthermore, irrespective of the dilution rate, root and shoot biomass increased with an increasing proportion of BSFF. Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of chFE to improve soil fertility and boost crop yield and soil microbiota (Quilliam et al., 2020; Beesigamukama et al., 2020b; Abiya et al., 2022).
The potential of chitin to suppress nematode infection in plants has been reported for RKNs (Ladner et al., 2008; Eberlein and Westphal, 2023) and other plant-parasitic nematodes (Tian et al., 2000). Infection of plant roots by RKNs is characterized by the development of multinucleate-feeding cells, which enlarge to form galls, with a single gall often feeding one or multiple growing females (Abad et al., 2010; Jones and Goto, 2011). In our study, we observed a significant suppression in gall formation upon drenching the spinach plants with chFE; this is an indication of the failure by J2 to either infect or establish a feeding site in the roots of chFE-drenched plants. In fact, the reported in vitro mortality of J2 (≥90%) upon exposure to chFE directly translates into a reduction in the available J2 inoculum level for infection and thus the observed reduction in gall formation, egg mass development and number of J2.
In addition to catalyzing the biological breakdown of BSFE and BSFF into chFE, the microbes used possess additional benefits. For example, B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa have been shown to possess antagonism against key plant pathogens and pests including plant-parasitic nematodes (Basyony and Abo-Zaid, 2018; Mazzuchelli et al., 2020) and play a crucial role in improving plant growth and development. Thus, future studies will be necessary to determine the exact mechanisms involved in the nematicidal and plant growth promotion activities of chFE to generate key information necessary for developing chFE-based strategies and products for M. incognita control.
Infection of a host plant root by J2 largely relies on the intensity and frequency of the nematode stylet thrusts (movements), which leads to the weakening of the epidermal and subepidermal cell walls, release of secretions, and establishment of a feeding site composed of multinucleate giant cells (Wyss et al., 1992). The observed reduction in M. incognita infection of chFE-treated spinach plants can be attributed to the paralysis of J2 upon exposure to chFE under in vitro conditions. Paralyzed J2 is characterized by a reduction in the intensity and frequency of stylet thrusts, hence their inability to break through the cell wall and establish a feeding site. Furthermore, nematode paralysis reduces the ability of J2s to move and locate the host plant roots, thus limiting infection to the plant. Although this study focused on the potential of chFE to suppress below-ground nematode infestation, future studies should also assess the efficacy of these products on nematode populations that might have infected the aerial plant parts as reported in the study by Singh et al. (2016).
5 Conclusions
The current study has demonstrated the in vitro antagonistic effects of chFE against nematode eggs and infective juveniles that were comparable to commercial nematicide. Similarly, chFE exhibited antagonism against M. incognita infection of spinach plants through suppression of gall formation, egg mass development and number of J2 in the root system. Thus, chFE could be considered an excellent eco-friendly and sustainable bionematicide for the management of plant-parasitic nematodes to strengthen existing integrated control strategies. Additional research to explore the in planta efficacy of chFE in other crops and open-field environments is warranted. Furthermore, future studies to investigate the mechanisms involved in chFE efficacy will help to explore the full potential of chFE for nematode management. The impact of chFE on crop productivity and soil health in terms of crop nutrient uptake and nutritional quality, control of other pests, soil nutrient release and beneficial microbes as well as pathogen suppression should be further investigated.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
JK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. SS: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. PT: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. SK: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. CT: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research by the following organizations and agencies: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) (ProteinAfrica –Grant No: LS/2020/154), Novo Nordisk Foundation (RefIPro: NNF22SA0078466), the Rockefeller Foundation (WAVE-IN—Grant No: 2021 FOD 030); Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-032416); IKEA Foundation (G-2204-02144), Horizon Europe (NESTLER - Project: 101060762 - HORIZON-CL6-2021-FARM2FORK-01), the Curt Bergfors Foundation Food Planet Prize Award; Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, the Section for Research, Innovation and Higher Education grant number RAF–3058 KEN–18/0005 (CAP–Africa); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC); the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR); the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad); the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ); the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia; and the Government of the Republic of Kenya. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate Joshua M. Wambua, Shem Ondiaka, Isiah E. Rachami, Dennis Gatimu, and Faith N. Wamurango for their technical support during data collection.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Author disclaimer
The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the donors.
References
Abad, P., Castagnone-Sereno, P., Rosso, M.-N., Engler, J., de, A., Favery, B. (2010). “Invasion, Feeding and Development,” in Root-knot nematodes. Eds. Perry, R. N., Moens, M., Starr, J. L. (CABI, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK), 163–181.
Abidin, N. A. Z., Kormin, F., Abidin, N. A. Z., Anuar, N. A. F. M., Bakar, M. F. A. (2020). The potential of insects as alternative sources of chitin: An overview on the chemical method of extraction from various sources. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–25. doi: 10.3390/ijms21144978
Abiya, A. A., Kupesa, D. M., Beesigamukama, D., Kassie, M., Mureithi, D., Thairu, D., et al. (2022). Agronomic performance of kale (Brassica oleracea) and swiss chard (Beta vulgaris) grown on soil amended with black soldier fly frass fertilizer under wonder multistorey gardening system. Agronomy 12, 2211. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12092211
Barragán-Fonseca, K. Y., Nurfikari, A., van de Zande, E. M., Wantulla, M., van Loon, J. J. A., de Boer, W., et al. (2022). Insect frass and exuviae to promote plant growth and health. Trends Plant Sci., 27, 646–654. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2022.01.007
Basyony, A. G., Abo-Zaid, G. A. (2018). Biocontrol of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, using an eco-friendly formulation from Bacillus subtilis, lab. and greenhouse studies. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 28, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s41938-018-0094-4
Bebber, D. P., Holmes, T., Gurr, S. J. (2014). The global spread of crop pests and pathogens. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 1398–1407. doi: 10.1111/geb.12214
Beesigamukama, D., Mochoge, B., Korir, N. K., Fiaboe, K. K. M., Nakimbugwe, D., Khamis, F. M., et al. (2020a). Biochar and gypsum amendment of agro-industrial waste for enhanced black soldier fly larval biomass and quality frass fertilizer. PloS One 15, 1–25. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238154
Beesigamukama, D., Mochoge, B., Korir, N. K., Fiaboe, K. K. M., Nakimbugwe, D., Khamis, F. M., et al. (2020b). Exploring black soldier fly frass as novel fertilizer for improved growth, yield, and nitrogen use efficiency of maize under field conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.574592
Beesigamukama, D., Mochoge, B., Korir, N. K., K.M. Fiaboe, K., Nakimbugwe, D., Khamis, F. M., et al. (2021). Low-cost technology for recycling agro-industrial waste into nutrient-rich organic fertilizer using black soldier fly. Waste Manage. 119, 183–194. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.043
Bernal, M. P., Sommer, S. G., Chadwick, D., Qing, C., Guoxue, L., Michel, F. C. (2017). Current approaches and future trends in compost quality criteria for agronomic, environmental, and human health benefits. Adv. Agron. 144, 143–233. doi: 10.1016/BS.AGRON.2017.03.002
Bloukounon-Goubalan, A. Y., Saïdou, A., Clottey, V. A., Coulibaly, K., Erokotan, N., Obognon, N., et al. (2021). “Insects as animal feed,” in Insects as Animal Feed Novel Ingredients for Use in Pet, Aquaculture and Livestock Diets. Eds. Hall, H., Fitches, E., Smith, R. (CABI, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK), 60–71.
Brian, A., Venables, B., Bates, D. M., Firth, D., Ripley, M. B. (2021) Support functions and datasets for Venables and Ripley’s MASS. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=MASS.
Coyne, D. L., Cortada, L., Dalzell, J. J., Claudius-cole, A. O., Haukeland, S., Luambano, N., et al. (2018a). Plant-parasitic nematodes and food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 56, 381–403. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045833
Coyne, D. L., Nicol, J. M., Claudius-Cole, B. (2018b). Practical plant nematology: A field and laboratory guide. 3rd edition (Ibadan, Nigeria: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA).
Coyne, D. L., Ross, J. L. (2014) PROTOCOL for Nematode Resistance Screening Root-Knot Nematodes Meloidogyne spp. Available online at: www.iita.org.
De Grisse (1963). A counting dish for nematodes excluding border effect. Nematologica 9, 162–162. doi: 10.1163/187529263X00313
Diclaro, J. W., Kaufman, P. E. (2012)Black soldier fly Hermetia illucens Linnaeus ( Insecta : Diptera : Stratiomyidae). In: Univ. Florida, IFAS Ext. EENY 461. Creat. Available online at: http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/ (Accessed January 23, 2024).
Eberlein, C., Westphal, A. (2023). Suppression of Meloidogyne incognita by co-application of chitin and Streptomyces nigrescens (AMV1033). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 33, 484–498. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2023.2204513
El Knidri, H., Belaabed, R., Addaou, A., Laajeb, A., Lahsini, A. (2018). Extraction, chemical modification and characterization of chitin and chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 120, 1181–1189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.139
Fan, Z., Qin, Y., Liu, S., Xing, R., Yu, H., Chen, X., et al. (2019). The bioactivity of new chitin oligosaccharide dithiocarbamate derivatives evaluated against nematode disease (Meloidogyne incognita). Carbohydr. Polym. 224, 115155. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115155
Göze Özdemir, F. G., Çevik, H., Ndayiragije, J. C., Özek, T., Karaca, İ. (2022). Nematicidal effect of chitosan on Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and on tomato in a pot experiment. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Food Sci. 6, 410–416. doi: 10.31015/jaefs.2022.3.10
Grégorio, C., Lichtfouse, E. (2019). Sustainable agriculture reviews 36 chitin and Chitosan: Applications in food, agriculturep Pharmacy, medicine and wastewater treatment (Cham, Switzerland: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-16581-9
Hallmann, J., Subbotin, A. S. (2018). “Methods for extraction, processing and detection of plant and soil nematodes,” in Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture. Eds. Sikora, R. A., Coyne, D., Hallmann, J., Timper, P. (CAB International, Wallingford, UK), 87–119.
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., Westfall, P., Heiberger, R. M., Schuetzenmeister, A., Scheibe, S. (2021) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=multcomp.
Jones, M. G. K., Goto, D. B. (2011). “Root-knot nematodes and giant cells,” in Genomics and molecular genetics of plant-nematode interactions (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 83–102.
Kemboi, V. J., Kipkoech, C., Njire, M., Were, S., Lagat, M. K., Ndwiga, F., et al. (2022). Biocontrol potential of chitin and chitosan extracted from black soldier fly pupal exuviae against bacterial wilt of tomato. Microorganisms 10, 165. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10010165
Ladner, D. C., Tchounwou, P. B., Lawrence, G. W. (2008). Evaluation of the effect of ecologic on root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, and tomato plant, Lycopersicon esculenum. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 5, 104–110. doi: 10.3390/ijerph5020104
Lagat, M. K., Were, S., Ndwigah, F., Kemboi, V. J., Kipkoech, C., Tanga, C. M. (2021). Antimicrobial activity of chemically and biologically treated chitosan prepared from black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) pupal shell waste. Microorganisms 9, 2417. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122417
Lalander, C. H., Fidjeland, J., Diener, S., Eriksson, S., Vinnerås, B. (2015). High waste-to-biomass conversion and efficient Salmonella spp. reduction using black soldier fly for waste recycling. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 261–271. doi: 10.1007/s13593-014-0235-4
Lenth, V. R. (2022) emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.7.4-1. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans.
Manzanilla-López, H. R., Starr, L. J. (2010). “Interactions with other pathogens,” in Root-knot nematodes. Eds. Perry, R. N., Moens, M., Starr, J. L. (CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK), 223–245.
Maurice, M., Perry, R. N., Starr, J. L. (2010). “Meloidogyne species—a diverse group of novel and important plant parasites,” in Root knot nematodes. Eds. Perry, R. N., Moens, M., Starr, J. L. (CABI International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK), 1–17.
Mazzuchelli, R., de, C. L., Mazzuchelli, E. H. L., de Araujo, F. F. (2020). Efficiency of Bacillus subtilis for root-knot and lesion nematodes management in sugarcane. Biol. Control 143, 104185. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104185
Mota, L. C. B. M., dos Santos, M. A. (2016). Chitin and chitosan on Meloidogyne javanica management and on chitinase activity in tomato plants. Trop. Plant Pathol. 41, 84–90. doi: 10.1007/s40858-016-0072-x
Oka, Y., Yermiyahu, U. (2002). Suppressive effects of composts against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica on tomato. Nematology 4, 891–898. doi: 10.1163/156854102321122502
O’Neill, M. E., Mathews, K. L. (2002). Levene tests of homogeneity of variance for general block and treatment designs. Biometrics 58, 216–224. doi: 10.2307/3068309
Onkendia, E. M., Kariukib, G. M., Maraisc, M., Molelekia, L. N. (2014). The threat of root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp in Africa: a review. Plant Pathol. 63, 727–737. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12202
Perry, R. N., Moens, M., Starr, J. L. (2010). Root-knot nematodes (Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CABI International).
Quilliam, R. S., Nuku-Adeku, C., Maquart, P., Little, D., Newton, R., Murray, F. (2020). Integrating insect frass biofertilisers into sustainable peri-urban agro-food systems. J. Insects as Food Feed 6, 315–322. doi: 10.3920/JIFF2019.0049
Radwan, M. A., Farrag, S. A. A., Abu-Elamayem, M. M., Ahmed, N. S. (2012). Extraction, characterization, and nematicidal activity of chitin and chitosan derived from shrimp shell wastes. Biol. Fertil. Soils 48, 463–468. doi: 10.1007/s00374-011-0632-7
Ralmi, N. H. A. A., Khandaker, M. M., Mat, N. (2016). Occurrence and control of root knot nematode in crops: A review. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 10, 1649–1654. doi: 10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.12.p7444
R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (4.2.2). Available online at: https://www.r-project.org/.
Santos, V. P., Marques, N. S. S., Maia, P. C. S. V., de Lima, M. A. B., Franco, L., de, O., et al. (2020). Seafood waste as attractive source of chitin and chitosan production and their applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–17. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124290
Schmitz, C., Auza, L. G., Koberidze, D., Rasche, S., Fischer, R., Bortesi, L. (2019). Conversion of chitin to defined chitosan oligomers: Current status and future prospects. Mar. Drugs 17, 1–22. doi: 10.3390/md17080452
Shamshina, J. L., Kelly, A., Oldham, T., Rogers, R. D. (2020). Agricultural uses of chitin polymers. Environ. Chem. Lett. 18, 53–60. doi: 10.1007/s10311-019-00934-5
Shapiro, S. S., Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples) Published by : Biometrika Trust Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/2333709. Biometrika 52, 591–611. doi: 10.2307/2333709
Sharp, R. G. (2013). A review of the applications of chitin and its derivatives in agriculture to modify plant-microbial interactions and improve crop yields. Agronomy 3, 757–793. doi: 10.3390/agronomy3040757
Shumo, M., Osuga, I. M., Khamis, F. M., Tanga, C. M., Fiaboe, K. K. M., Subramanian, S., et al. (2019). The nutritive value of black soldier fly larvae reared on common organic waste streams in Kenya. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46603-z
Sikora, R. A., Coyne, D., Hallmann, J., Timper, P. (2018). “Reflections and challenges: Nematology in subtropical and tropical agriculture,” in Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture. Eds. Sikora, R. A., Coyne, D., Hallmann, J., Timper, P. (CABI, Wallingford, UK), 1–19.
Singh, A. K., Joshi, I., Kumar, A., Kohli, D., Jain, P. K., Sirohi, A. (2016). Aerial Infection of Southern Root-Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Indian J. Nematol. 46, 183–185.
Tan, Y. N., Lee, P. P., Chen, W. N. (2020). Microbial extraction of chitin from seafood waste using sugars derived from fruit waste-stream. AMB Express 10, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-0954-7
Taylon, A. A., Dropkin, H., Marin, G. C. (1956). Perineal patterns of the root-knot nematodes. Phytopathology 46, 26–34.
Therneau, M. T. (2022) A package for survival analysis in R. R package version 3.4-0. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=survival.
Tian, H., Riggs, R. D., Crippen, D. L. (2000). Control of soybean cyst nematode by chitinolytic bacteria with chitin substrate. J. Nematol. 32, 370–376.
Tomberlin, J. K., Sheppard, D. C., Joyce, J. A. (2002). Selected life-history traits of black soldier flies (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) reared on three artificial diets. Ann. Entomol. Soc Am. 95, 379–386. doi: 10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0379:SLHTOB]2.0.CO;2
Trudgill, D. L., Bala, G., Blok, V. C., Daudi, A., Davies, K. G., Gowen, S. R., et al. (2000). The importance of tropical root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) and factors affecting the utility of Pasteuria penetrans as a biocontrol agent. Nematology 2, 823–845. doi: 10.1163/156854100750112789
Wesemael, W. M. L., Viaene, N., Moens, M. (2011). Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology 13, 3–16. doi: 10.1163/138855410X526831
WHO (2020). The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification (Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization). Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240005662.
Wyss, U. F. M. W., Grundler, F. M., Munch, A. (1992). The parasitic behaviour of second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Nematologica 38, 98–111. doi: 10.1163/187529292X00081
Keywords: insect exuviae, insect frass, organic chitin, nature-based solution, bionematicide
Citation: Kisaakye J, Beesigamukama D, Haukeland S, Subramanian S, Thiongo PK, Kelemu S and Tanga CM (2024) Chitin-enriched insect frass fertilizer as a biorational alternative for root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) management. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1361739. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1361739
Received: 26 December 2023; Accepted: 14 February 2024;
Published: 05 March 2024.
Edited by:
Eustachio Tarasco, University of Bari Aldo Moro, ItalyReviewed by:
Ashish Kumar Singh, ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, IndiaArthy Surendran, Scotland’s Rural College, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2024 Kisaakye, Beesigamukama, Haukeland, Subramanian, Thiongo, Kelemu and Tanga. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chrysantus M. Tanga, ctanga@icipe.org; Dennis Beesigamukama, dbeesigamukama@icipe.org; James Kisaakye, jkisaakye@icipe.org