- 1Institut Agro Rennes Angers (INRAE), Université Rennes, Institut Agro, IGEPP-UMR1349, P2M2-MetaboHUB, Le Rheu, France
- 2Bioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- 3Systems Biology and Mathematical Modeling, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany
Editorial on the Research Topic
Isotopic labeling approaches for exploring plant metabolism dynamics
In the context of climate change, understanding plant metabolism - the basis of biomass and defense response - is at the core of next-generation breeding strategies to obtain climate-resilient crops. Indeed, metabolic fluxes are the result of regulation at multiple levels from transcriptional and (post) translational to metabolic regulation. Metabolic fluxes represent the most direct link with agronomically relevant traits, including: growth, tolerance and resistance to (a) biotic stresses, and yield. Hence, it is important to understand how particular metabolic fluxes shape these traits and their response to different environmental cues. These two problems can be addressed by: (i) tracing the fate of metabolic probes within the metabolic network and (ii) using the resulting data to quantify the activity of individual metabolic reactions and pathways via metabolic flux analysis (MFA). The latter requires dynamic analyses, conducted at isotopically non-stationary state, to obtain informative data. Coupled with analyses of differential flux behavior, such approaches could introduce new targets for improving crop resilience.
Despite the unprecedented production of data from 13C-labeling experiments and the recent emergence of dedicated software, 13C-INST-MFA remains marginally applied to photosynthesizing organisms. These discrepancies can reflect the complexity of this modelling approach, i.e. fitting both metabolite pools and reaction fluxes, dealing with multiple compartments but also its sensitivity to errors of isotopic measurements. In this Research Topic, four studies addressed these methodological bottlenecks by using approaches for the field of plant science. Huß and Nikoloski survey the literature on local approaches for INST-MFA. They systematically compared existing local approaches with respect to the required data and underlying computational problems solved on a synthetic network example. The performance of these approaches in estimating fluxes was benchmarked using a sub-network of Arabidopsis thaliana nitrogen metabolism. Important recommendations for isotopic measurements (resolution, accuracy) and metabolic sub-network selection were formulated to maximize flux estimation performances with local flux estimation approaches. Dellero at al. provided an update of 13C distribution measurement accuracies by GC-MS using tailor-made 13C-standards that had a predictable 13C distribution. Using the validated MS method and U-13C-pyruvate incorporations into Brassica napus, they used the pathway fractional contribution (local approach) to compare phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle fluxes. They also identified a cyclic mode of the TCA cycle in the light and questioned the contribution of stored citrate to this cycle. Küken et al. proposed a new and simplified local approach as an alternative to classical INST-MFA. This approach, called simulation-free constrained regression approach (SFCR), formulated flux estimation for Calvin-Benson cycle as a single constrained regression problem, avoiding the need for repeated simulation of time-resolved labeling patterns. Using 13C-data from three different microalgae, SFCR approach provided a suitable alternative for flux estimation in data-rich scenarios when compared to INCA tool. Smith et al. addressed the challenge of applying INST-MFA to heterotrophic cells following an oxidative load using U-13C-glucose incorporations. INCA-based modelling yielded statistically acceptable flux solutions by tuning different parameters (inactive pools, distinct compartments, remobilization of unlabeled carbon, uncertainty of isotopic measurements) at the cost of precision in flux estimates. Overall, the oxidative load caused only relatively subtle changes in flux through the network of central carbon metabolism.
Besides these cellular functional analyses, two other studies used stable isotopes to investigate important nutritional and physiological processes at the whole-plant level. Yan et al. studied the contribution of complex organic fertilizers to the Zn nutrition of Ryegrass using 67Zn-labeled soil. Nearly 83% of Zn was derived from the soil, 15% from the fertilizers and 2% from the seed. The results indicated that most of the freshly added Zn remained in the soil after one crop cycle and may thereby contribute to a residual Zn pool in the soil. Kunz et al. evaluated the suitability of 13C discrimination, relative leaf water content and plant canopy temperature to phenotype drought/heat resistance of winter wheat for future climate resilience. Using field trials with different wheat varieties (regionally adapted and German varieties), they concluded that 13C discrimination was the best indicator for drought resistance. Given the indirect link between 13C discrimination and leaf water content, such results highlighted the central role of leaf metabolism in tolerance to drought.
This Research Topic provides an update of methods and tools to improve both the accuracy of MS-based isotopic measurements and the feasibility of flux estimation in photosynthesizing organisms. The development of local approaches will certainly contribute to increase the application of 13C-MFA for the next years in order to easily: (i) test specific hypotheses about the activity of particular metabolic pathways in plants and other eukaryotic photosynthesizing organisms; (ii) quantify and compare reaction fluxes under different growth scenarios. Given the ability of plant metabolism to influence physiological processes at the whole-plant level, plant fluxomics is an interesting area to investigate to raise targets for developing next-generation climate-resilient crops. While isotopic labeling and 13C-MFA approaches are routinely used to describe how cancer cells function, there is still a long way to go before they are routinely used in plants. The development of national and international structures and collaborations in the field of plant fluxomics will definitely speed things up.
Author contributions
YD: Writing – original draft. ZN: Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
The editors acknowledge the reviewers who handled manuscripts for this Research Topic on Isotopic Labeling Approaches for Exploring Plant Metabolism Dynamics.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: metabolic flux analysis (MFA), isotopic labeling, 13C discrimination, microalgae, crops
Citation: Dellero Y and Nikoloski Z (2024) Editorial: Isotopic labeling approaches for exploring plant metabolism dynamics. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1356153. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1356153
Received: 15 December 2023; Accepted: 20 December 2023;
Published: 08 January 2024.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Mark Blyth, University of East Anglia, United KingdomCopyright © 2024 Dellero and Nikoloski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Younès Dellero, younes.dellero@inrae.fr; Zoran Nikoloski, nikoloski@mpimp-golm.mpg.de