Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 20 June 2023
Sec. Plant Symbiotic Interactions
This article is part of the Research Topic Microbe Assisted Plant Resistance to Abiotic Stresses View all 11 articles

Microbial interactions and metabolisms in response to bacterial wilt and black shank pathogens in the tobacco rhizosphere

Qianjun Tang&#x;Qianjun Tang1†Tianbo Liu,&#x;Tianbo Liu1,2†Kai TengKai Teng2Zhipeng XiaoZhipeng Xiao2Hailin CaiHailin Cai2Yunsheng WangYunsheng Wang1Yunhua Xiao*Yunhua Xiao3*Wu Chen*Wu Chen1*
  • 1College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
  • 2Laboratory of Plant Protection, Hunan Tobacco Science Institute, Changsha, China
  • 3College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China

Background: Tobacco bacterial wilt (TBW) and black shank (TBS) are responsible for substantial economic losses worldwide; however, microbial interactions and metabolisms in response to TBW and TBS pathogens in the tobacco rhizosphere remain unclear.

Methods: We explored and compared the response of rhizosphere microbial communities to these two plant diseases with the incidences in moderate and heavy degrees by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons and bioinformatics analysis.

Results and discussions: We found that the structure of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities was significantly (p < 0.05) changed from the incidences of TBW and TBS, which also led to decreased Shannon diversity and Pielou evenness. Compared with the healthy group (CK), the OTUs with significantly (p < 0.05) decreased relative abundances were mostly affiliated with Actinobacteria (e.g., Streptomyces and Arthrobacter) in the diseased groups, and the OTUs with significantly (p < 0.05) increased relative abundances were mainly identified as Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria. Also, molecular ecological network analysis showed that the nodes (<467) and links (<641) were decreased in the diseased groups compared with the control group (572; 1056), suggesting that both TBW and TBS weakened bacterial interactions. In addition, the predictive functional analysis indicated that the relative abundance of genes related to the biosynthesis of antibiotics (e.g., ansamycins and streptomycin) was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased due to incidences of TBW and TBS, and antimicrobial tests showed that some Actinobacteria strains (e.g., Streptomyces) and their secreted antibiotics (e.g., streptomycin) could effectively inhibit the growth of these two pathogens.

Introduction

Soil-borne diseases caused by bacteria or fungi often occur in agriculture and bring huge economic losses, and plant resistance mechanisms to plant diseases are complex (Deverall, 1987). Many researchers showed that the incidence of plant soil-borne diseases was closely related to plant species and soil environments (Kyselková et al., 2009; Schreiter et al., 2018). For plant autoimmune mechanisms, plants can recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns and pathogen-delivered effectors to stimulate corresponding responses. Plants can strengthen existing defenses, elicit other defense mechanisms (Gómez-Gómez and Boller, 2002) mediated by secondary signal molecules such as salicylic acid, ethylene, and jasmonic acid, and fine-tune their defense responses (Wang et al., 2002).

The soil environment, including biotic (e.g., populations of bacteria and fungi) and abiotic (e.g., soil type and nutrients) factors, is critical to impacting disease incidence (Choi et al., 2020; Gu et al., 2022; Kim et al., 2022; Ren et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022). Microbes in the rhizosphere soil are the first protective screen against plant soil-borne pathogens (Kwak et al., 2018), and they can hinder pathogen growth through competent (e.g., nutrient and space) and antagonistic (e.g., antimicrobial peptide and phenolic acid antibacterial agent) actions. Many microbial ecological agents have recently been isolated from rhizosphere soil samples to control plant diseases (Tan et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2022). For example, Bacillus spp., isolated from wheat soil samples, could effectively reduce the growth of Fusarium graminearum strains causing fusarium head blight (Stumbriene et al., 2018), and Flavobacterium sp. TRM1, isolated from rhizosphere soil, could suppress Ralstonia solanacearum disease development (Kwak et al., 2018). Therefore, it is necessary to understand rhizosphere soil microbial communities and their associations with plant disease incidence.

Some soil-borne diseases often co-occur, making disease management more difficult. Many methods, e.g., promoting plant immune reaction, optimizing agronomic management, and developing biocontrol agents, were studied to prevent disease incidence. The plant immune system is determined by plant genes (Deverall, 1987), which need direct and hard genetic manipulation. The disease inhibiting efficiency of optimizing agronomic management is limited. Therefore, more and more researchers have focused on the beneficial rhizosphere soil or endophytic microbes. The anti-pathogen mechanism of microbes is expected to be complex, especially for different pathogens (Bacon and White, 2016). For example, some antibiotics are broad-spectrum antimicrobials, and some are limited (Yao et al., 2016; Cao et al., 2022). Therefore, high abundances and diverse species of probiotics in the rhizosphere soil may effectively prevent and control multiple diseases. Besides, disease incidence or infection was largely related to indigenous ecological interactions and stability disrupted by pathogens, and in return, close interactions and strong stability of soil microbial communities may be necessary to suppress disease incidences or infections for plants (Miliute et al., 2015; Xiao et al., 2018).

Tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum) is an economically important crop worldwide. Tobacco bacterial wilt (TBW) and tobacco black shank (TBS), respectively caused by the bacterial pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum (Yin et al., 2022) and fungal pathogen Phytophthora nicotianae (Jin and Shew, 2021), are two accompanying of the most devastating soil-borne diseases resulting in severe losses in yield and quality of tobacco. Although many previous studies found a difference in rhizosphere microbial diversity after the infection of pathogenic bacteria and pathogenic fungi, few studies were conducted in the same field, crop, and period. In this study, we explored the composition and interactions of rhizosphere soil microbial communities in response to incidences of TBW and TBS in the same field, crop, and period by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Our results indicated that the diseased rhizosphere microbial communities decreased diversity and interactions as well as decreased functional species for the biosynthesis of antibiotics, leading to incidences of both bacterial and fungal diseases, and these plant pathogens could further weaken community functions. This study provides new insights into our understanding of broad-spectrum Actinobacteria and has important implications for controlling TBW and TBS with microbes.

Materials and methods

Rhizosphere soil sampling

Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from a long-term ecological research site for a tobacco (N. tabacum cultivar K326) consecutive monoculture experiment located in Xiangxi, Hunan, China. Soil type of this research site was clayey and climate is humid subtropical monsoon. Fertilizer consisted of 50 kg/mu special basal fertilizer, 20 kg/mu special top dressing, 15 kg/mu bioorganic fertilizer, and 5 kg/mu hole-applied fertilizer. Its N:P:K (N, P2O5, and K2O) was 1:1.2:2.43. Transplanted tobacco was irrigated with 300 kg/mu water and 5 kg/mu hole-applied fertilizer. No pest or disease controls was applied during the whole experiment. N. tabacum cultivar K326 was introduced by Northup King Seed Company (America) to Yunnan province (China) in 1985. It was now preserved in the Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, where we obtained and used seeds with permission.

At the N. tabacum harvesting stage in July 2017, we investigated the disease index of each tobacco plant in an area planted with 100 tobacco plants. The bacterial wilt and black shank disease index of each plant were determined based on the Chinese national standard GB/T 23222-2008, as described by Gao et al. (2015), ranging from 0 (lowest) to 9 (highest). In this study, moderate infection with a disease index of 1, 3 and 5, and heavy infection with a disease index of 7 and 9.

We designed five groups: the group with no disease (CK), the group moderately infected by TBW (BWM), the group heavily infected by TBW (BWH), the group moderately infected by TBS (BSM), and the group of heavily infected by TBS (BSH). Eight rhizosphere soil samples were collected using a clean spade for each group following Kwak et al. (2018). The whole roots of each tobacco plant were collected at a soil depth of 0–20 cm. The loose soil particles adhering to the roots were shaken off. Afterward, the roots were placed in a 200-mL tube containing 100 mL of phosphate buffered saline buffer, and washed 3 times with shaking at 180 r/min. Finally, the rhizosphere soils were obtained after centrifuged at 10 000 r/min for 10 min and removing the supernatant. The rhizosphere soil samples were stored at -80°C before DNA extraction.

DNA extraction, amplification, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and data processing

DNA extraction, amplification, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and data processing followed by Xiao et al. (2018). The rhizosphere soil from each root collection was homogenized, and 1.0 g from each sample was used for DNA extraction using a PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO, San Diego, USA). DNA extracts were purified by electrophoresis on a 0.7% agarose gel using a DNA gel extraction kit (OMEGA, USA). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primer pair 515F (5’-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3’) and 806R (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’), combined with Illumina adapter sequences, a pad and a linker of two bases, and barcodes on the reverse primer. PCR products were purified, and the concentration was quantified with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, USA). The products were sequenced on a MiSeq machine (Illumina, San Diego, CA) using a 500-cycle kit. All 16S rRNA gene sequences were submitted to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI, and the accession number is PRJNA899683.

Molecular ecological network construction and characterization

Random matrix theory (RMT)-based approaches were used for network construction (Yin et al., 2015), hub and connector OTU identification and the topological property were determined with a similar threshold (0.95). OTUs, presented in 8 out of 8 replicates, were used for network analysis to ensure data reliability. Various network properties were characterized, such as average degree, average path distance, average clustering coefficient, and modularity index. The network modules were generated using rapid greedy modularity optimization. The experimental data used for constructing phylogenetic molecular ecological networks (pMENs) were based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, and Gephi 0.9.2 software was used to visualize network graphs. The pMENs were constructed separately based on sequencing data of five treatments to reveal the effects of different disease incidences on the microbial network interactions.

Functional profiling

Prior to functional gene prediction using PICRUSt (phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states) described by Langille et al. (2013), the detected OTUs were reclassified using the GREENGENES reference database. Subsequently, PICRUSt uses 16S rRNA genes to infer metagenome gene functional content from phylogenetic information. The predictions are precalculated for genes in databases, including the Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). The input data were first normalized by copy number by dividing each OTU by the known 16S rRNA copy number abundance before metagenome predictions and subsequent collapse into functional pathways. The output of PICRUSt consists of a table of functional gene counts as KEGG orthologs (KOs). The Nearest Sequenced Taxon Index (NSTI) value was used to validate the reliability of predicted metagenomes and functional pathways.

Species isolation and identification

According to data analysis, Actinobacteria could play a key role in inhibiting P. nicotianae and R. solanacearum growth. We isolated some Actinobacteria strains from the rhizosphere soil of healthy tobacco plants in the above sampling site using GAUZE’s Medium NO.1. P. nicotianae HD1 and R. solanacearum GMI1000 were obtained originally from diseased N. tabacum roots. The single-species antagonism experiments were conducted as the description in our previous study (Liu et al., 2020). And the antagonistic isolates were identified following Ghodhbane-Gtari et al. (2010) based on 16S rRNA gene sequences against the NCBI database. The 16S rDNA sequence was amplified by PCR using primers 27F (5-AGAGTTTGATCACTGGCTCAG-3) and 1492R (5-CGGCTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3).

Antimicrobial tests of antibiotics

The antimicrobial effect of several antibiotics was tested by the filtering paper method. Antibiotics included streptomycin, tetracycline and novobiocin, which are biosynthesized by Actinobacteria. The pathogens were P. nicotianae (incubated in the PDA medium) and bacterial pathogen R. solanacearum (incubated in the LB Agar).

Pot experiments

The effect of antagonistic strain on TBW and TBS was investigated by a pot experiment in the greenhouse. The cultivated tobacco seedlings (5 to 6 true leaves) were transplanted into pots with sterilized soil. Fifteen days after transplantation, the root was rinsed with the bacterial solution of strain 4-9 (1×108 CFU/mL). The treatment with sterile distilled water replaced bacterial solution was a negative control (CK). Eighteen seedlings of each treatment were repeated 3 times, and 50 mL bacterial solution or sterile distilled water was applied to each plant. 24 h after root irrigation, zoospore/bacterial suspensions were inoculated with a concentration of 1×104/mL (20 mL per plant). The incidence of TBS was observed 30 days after inoculation with P. nicotiana, and the incidence of TBW was observed 15 days after inoculation with R. solanacearum. Disease classification was according to the Chinese national standard GB/T 23222-2008, further calculating the incidence, disease index and prevention effect.

Statistical analysis

The community diversity was assessed using the Shannon diversity index (H′) and species diversity index. Differences in diversity and relative abundances of bacterial composition based on Tukey’s test were conducted by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and response ratio analysis (Deng et al., 2012). Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) and dissimilarity tests were conducted to analyze the bacterial community structure. Linear regression analysis was carried out to explore relationships between disease suppression and microbial diversity (Barberán et al., 2014; Wagg et al., 2014; Cui et al., 2016). All analyses were performed using R v.3.6.3 and STAMP v 2.1.3. The functional/key OTUs were identified following Sheng et al. (2008) by comparing their 16S rRNA gene sequences to the NCBI database, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 5.2 (Kumar et al., 2018).

Results

Overview of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities

After clustering at the 97% sequence identity, 4955 OTUs were identified to comprise the soil bacterial community. The α-diversity index, including Shannon diversity and Pielou evenness, were shown in Table 1. Compared with the CK group (H’: 6.387; J’: 0.824), the Shannon diversity index was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in the BWH (5.830), BSM (6.054) and BSH (5.679) groups, and Pielou evenness index was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced in the BSH group (0.758). DCA showed that the CK samples were segregated from the BWM and BWH samples (Figure 1A), and the BWM and BWH samples were also segregated from each other. Similarly, the CK samples were separated from the BSM and BSH samples (Figure 1B). Further dissimilarity tests showed that although the structure of BWM or BSM microbial communities was not significantly (p < 0.05) different, the CK group was significantly (p < 0.05) different from the other four pathogenic groups, and the heavily infected groups (BWH and BSH) were significantly (p < 0.05) different (Additional file 1), indicating the structure of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities was influenced by plant diseases at different degrees.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Shannon diversity and Pielou evenness of microbial communities in the five groups.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 The ordination plots of all samples for the community structure analyzed by detrended correspondence analysis (A, B) and Venn diagram (C, D). CK: control group; BWM: the group of moderately infected by TBW; BWH: the group of heavily infected by TBW; BSM: the group of moderately infected by TBS; BSH: the group of heavily infected by TBS.

The Venn diagram showed that there were 936, 175 and 335 unique OTUs in the CK, BWM and BWH groups, respectively, and the number of core OTUs was 2165 (Figure 1C), occupying the relative abundance up to 99%. Similarly, there were 665, 456 and 201 unique OTUs in the CK, BSM and BSH groups, respectively (Figure 1D), and 2295 core OTUs, occupying up to 99% relative abundance.

The compositions of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities shifted under the incidence of TBW and TBS

At the phylum level, the bacterial composition of five groups consisted of 26 phyla, which were mostly dominated by Proteobacteria (26.0~53.8%), Actinobacteria (8.0~33.6%), Acidobacteria (5.1~19.8%), Chloroflexi (1.2~15.1%), Bacteroidetes (1.4~9.3%), Thaumarchaeota (0.1~18.6%), and Verrucomicrobia (0.7~7.5%) (Figure 2A). However, compared with the CK group, the relative abundances of some phyla were changed under the incidence of plant diseases. ANOVA results showed that the average relative abundances of four phyla (Verrucomicrobia, BRC1, Latescibacteria, and Armatimonadetes) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower, and two (Chloroflexi and WPS-2) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the BWM group (Figure 2D); the average relative abundances of five phyla (Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, BRC1, Latescibacteria, and Armatimonadetes) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower, and six (Chloroflexi, Thaumarchaeota, Firmicutes, Euryarchaeota, Parcubacteria and WPS-2) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher (Figure 2E) in the BWH group; the average relative abundance of one phylum (BRC1) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower, and two (Chloroflexi and Chlamydiae) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the BSM group (Figure 2F); the average relative abundances of six phyla (Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, BRC1, Latescibacteria, Armatimonadetes and WPS-1) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower, and three (Chloroflexi, Parcubacteria and WPS-2) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the BSH group (Figure 2G). Besides, only one phylum showed a significant (p < 0.05) difference between BWM and BSM groups and two phyla between BWH and BSH groups (Figures 2H, I).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 The compositions of microbial communities in phylum (A), genus (B), OTU (C) levels, and the significant phyla between each two groups (D–I).

At the genus level (Figure 2B), compared with the CK group, the relative abundances of some genera were also changed by plant diseases. ANOVA results showed that: the average relative abundances of 84 genera (e.g., Gp6, Streptomyces and Gp4) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower and 43 (e.g., Rhodanobacter, Gp1, and Gp2) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the BWM group (Additional file 2); the average relative abundances of 91 genera (e.g., Streptomyces, Gp6, and Gp4) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower and 26 (e.g., Nitrososphaera, Gp1 and Rhodanobacter) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the BWH group (Additional file 3); the average relative abundance of 60 genera (e.g., Gp6, Gp4 and Spartobacteria_genera_incertae_sedis) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower, and 27 (e.g., Ktedonobacter, Geothrix and Terriglobus) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the BSM group (Additional file 4); the average relative abundances of 113 genera (e.g., Gp6, Streptomyces and Gp4) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower, and 37 (e.g., Rhodanobacter, Gp1 and Ktedonobacter) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the BSH group (Additional file 5).

At the OTU level (Figure 2C), compared with the CK group, the composition of the other four groups was significantly (p < 0.05) different. ANOVA results showed that: the average relative abundances of 691 OTUs were significantly lower, and 239 were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the BWM group (Additional file 6); the average relative abundances of 654 OTUs were significantly (p < 0.05) lower, and 197 were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the BWH group (Additional file 7); the average relative abundance of 456 OTUs were significantly (p < 0.05) lower, and 198 were significantly higher in the BSM group (Additional file 8); the average relative abundances of 821 OTUs were significantly (p < 0.05) lower, and 128 were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the BSH group (Additional file 9).

We further aligned the 16S rRNA sequences of top 10 OTUs with the largest decrease (15 OTUs, Figure 3) or increase (19 OTUs, Figure 4) of relative abundances compared with the CK group to the NCBI database. The top 10 decreased OTUs were identical in the BWM, BWH, and BSH groups (Figures 3B, C, E), suggesting their importance in controlling the incidence of TBW and TBS. The phylogenetic tree (Figure 3A) indicated that six OTUs (OTU_8, OTU_16, OTU_17, OTU_34, OTU_42, and OTU_3189) were identified as Actinobacteria (Amycolatopsis, Lentzea, Arthrobacter, Janibacter, Streptomyces), two OTUs (OTU_74 and OTU_155) were identified as Acidobacteria (Gp4 and Gp6), and one OTU (OTU_6) was identified as proteobacteria (Sphingobium). In the BSM group, five OTUs were the same as the other three groups, and five were different (Figure 3D). The top 10 increased OTUs (19 OTUs in total) were different in the different groups (Figures 4B–E), but most of them were identified as Proteobacteria (6 OTUs) and Acidobacteria (5 OTUs) (Figure 4A). The relative abundances of OTU_2 (Thaumarchaeota) and OTU_18 (Acidobacteria_Geothrix) were increased in the four diseased groups.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Phylogenetic tree (A) of the top 10 decreased OTUs in BWM (B), BWH (C), BSM (D), and BSH (E) groups, compared with the CK group.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Phylogenetic tree (A) of the top 10 increased OTUs in BWM (B), BWH (C), BSM (D), and BSH (E) groups, compared with the CK group.

Network interactions of bacterial communities shifted under the incidence of TBW and TBS

To discern possible microbial interactions in response to TBW and TBS, molecular ecological networks (MENs) were constructed with 16S rRNA sequencing data using the RMT-based network approaches (Figures 5A–E). Major topological properties of empirical MENs of microbial communities in the nine groups were shown in Table 2. With the same threshold (0.900), their correlations were more than 0.750, indicating that the degree distributions in both constructed molecular ecological networks fitted the power-law model well. There were more nodes and links in the CK group (572 nodes and 1056 links) than those in the BWM (396 and 521), BWH (346 and 435), BSM (466 and 640), and BSH (392 and 512) groups. It showed interactions of rhizosphere soil microbial communities could be disrupted by pathogens of plant diseases, and the higher degree of plant diseases could lead to more network destruction compared to the CK group.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Molecular ecological networks in CK (A), BWM (B), BWH (C), BSM (D), and BSH (E) groups, and the Z-P plot showing the distribution of OTUs based on their topological roles (F). The color of the circle represented the module in the network interaction. The topological role of each OTU was determined according to the scatter plot of within-module connectivity (Zi) and among-module connectivity (Pi).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Topological properties of the empirical pMENs of soil bacterial communities in five groups.

There were also more module hubs (2 hubs) and connectors (14 connectors) in the CK group (Figure 5F). We further aligned the 16S rRNA sequences of all hubs and connectors (23 OTUs; 16 in CK; 4 in BWM; 2 in BWH; 1 in BSM; 1 in BSH) to the NCBI database (Additional file 10), and found that 11 OTUs were associated with Actinobacteria, and the other 12 OTUs with Proteobacteria (3 OTUs), Acidobacteria (3 OTUs), Verrucomicrobia (2 OTUs), Firmicutes (1 OTU), Gematimonadetes(1 OTU), Armatimonadetes(1 OTU), and unclassified phylum (1 OTU). OTU_48 (Proteobacteria_Ramlibacter) was a connector in both CK and BSM groups. Among the 23 OTUs, 14 OTUs (OTU_624, OTU_42, OTU_7584, OTU_2102, OTU_48, OTU_7351, OTU_9474, OTU_631, OTU_483, OTU_38, OTU_96, OTU_48, OTU_279, and OTU_671) were significantly (p < 0.05) different between the CK group and the diseased groups, and interestingly, the other 13 OTUs were higher in the CK group except OTU_671 (Additional file 10).

Metabolic diversity

Based on the 16S rRNA sequences, potential functions were predicted to explore changes of functional diversity and composition by plant pathogens. Although the functional diversity index showed no significant difference among these five groups (Additional file 11), DCA results showed that the CK samples were segregated from the diseased samples (Figures 6A, B), which was further verified using the dissimilarity tests (Additional file 12). There were about 6900 core genes in these groups, and more unique genes (121/126) were in the CK group compared with the other diseased groups (Figures 6C, D). Compared with the CK group, the relative abundance of genes related to metabolisms of carbohydrate, terpenoids and polyketides was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in the diseased groups, especially in the BWH group. In contrast, the relative abundance of genes related to cell process (e.g., cell motility) was significantly (p < 0.05) increased (Additional file 13) in the diseased groups.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 The ordination plots of all samples for the predicted genes analyzed by detrended correspondence analysis (A, B) and Venn diagram (C, D).

We further explored the change in gene abundances related to antibiotics biosynthesis pathways (metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides and biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites). ANOVA results showed that the relative abundances of 6 pathways, including biosynthesis of 12-, 14- and 16-membered macrolides, biosynthesis of ansamycins, polyketide sugar unit biosynthesis, biosynthesis of enediyne antibiotics, streptomycin biosynthesis, and penicillin and cephalosporin biosynthesis, were significantly decreased in all diseased groups (Table 3). Besides, 13 pathways (e.g., tetracycline biosynthesis and carbapenem biosynthesis) were also weakened, and three pathways (caffeine metabolism, tropane, piperidine and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis, and isoflavonoid biosynthesis) were enhanced in individual diseased groups (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 The key pathways with significant (p < 0.05) differences between the CK group and each diseased group.

Antagonistic effects of Actinobacteria and inhibition effects of antibiotics

Six strains were obtained after isolation on GAUZE’s medium NO. 1 of the rhizosphere soils in healthy tobacco plants. Through antagonism experiments, four strains could inhibit the growth of P. nicotianae HD1 (Figure 7A). After identification, two strains (3-13 and 3-17) had the highest similarity to Streptomyces sakaiensis (99%), one (4-9) similarity to Streptomyces acidiscabies (99%), and one (4-2) similarity to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (99%). A further experiment found that three strains could inhibit the growth of R. solanacearum GMI1000 (Figure 7B).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7 Antagonistic effects. The plate-antagonistic effects of isolated Actinobacteria strains on P. nicotianae HD1 (A) and R. solanacearum GMI1000 (B); The plate-inhibition experiments of some antibiotics on P. nicotianae HD1 (C) and R. solanacearum GMI1000 (D); The pot-antagonistic effects of strain 4-9 on P. nicotianae HD1 (E) and R. solanacearum GMI1000 (F).

Filtering paper methods (Figures 7C, D) showed that streptomycin (100 μg/ml), tetracycline (100 μg/ml), novobiocin (300 μg/ml) and vancomycin (100 μg/ml) could inhibit the growth of R. solanacearum GMI1000, and streptomycin (50 mg/ml) and novobiocin (100 mg/ml) could inhibit the growth of P. nicotianae HD1.

Results of the pot experiment indicated that compared with the CK group, the index and incidence of TBW (62.76%; 45.53%) and TBS (12.1%; 20.36%) in the group inoculated with strain 4-9 were significantly decreased (Figures 7E, F). The control efficiency of strain 4-9 was 60.40% on TBS and 30.67% on TBW.

Discussion

Previous studies focused on using microbial antagonists for controlling soil-borne diseases, and many biocontrol agents were found virtually for plant disease biocontrol against a single pathogen (Dunne et al., 1997; Liu et al., 2007; Shanks et al., 2012; Han et al., 2016). However, managing just one of the pathogens may not fully solve the problem since different pathogens often co-occur on the same plant, resulting in a disease complex causing synergistic yield losses (Shen et al., 2022). An environmentally friendly alternative could be using multiple strains with a broad spectrum of antagonism against multiple pathogens, which may provide excellent and new options for soil-borne disease control. TBW is a bacterial disease, and TBS is a fungal disease, which usually results in severe losses of yield and quality of tobacco, so that TBW and TBS can be excellent model for biocontrol research. The first task is to find effectively broad-spectrum microorganisms (Zheng et al., 2021; Shi et al., 2022). In this study, we studied the response of rhizosphere soil microbial communities to these two plant diseases.

The relationship between rhizosphere soil bacterial community composition/structure and crop disease incidence was well studied (Mengesha et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2018). It is clear that rhizosphere soil microbial communities generally differ between healthy and diseased plants (Niu et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017). After plants are infected, the soil microbial diversity and the abundance of probiotics decrease, and microbial interactions could be destroyed (Niu et al., 2017), which is also found in this study. It was also indicated that the change in rhizosphere soil microbial communities was more evident with the increased disease index. Although rhizosphere soil microbial communities showed some differences between different types (caused by fungi or bacteria) of plant diseases, they offered much more similarities. It is hypothesized that bacterial and fungal diseases would have different effects on rhizosphere soil microecology. Indeed, the composition and structure of rhizosphere soil microbial communities were different between the BWH and BSH groups, and three possible mechanisms are: the invasive ability of various pathogens is different; the plant immunocompetence to various pathogens are different; the effective probiotics are different (Horst and Kenneth, 1990; Keen et al., 1993; Ojiambo and Scherm, 2006). However, in our study, many results suggest that after different diseases are outbursts, the rhizosphere soil microbial community alters in a similar direction. The diversity index did not show differences between the TBS and TBW groups (Table 1); microbial interactions appeared to be simple; most of the varied populations (e.g., Actinobacteria) were found to be similar; most varied pathways (e.g., biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, biosynthesis of ansamycins) were almost the same among diseased groups.

The resistance mechanisms to plant diseases are complex, mainly depending on the plant-soil-microbe interaction in the soil system (Rasmussen et al., 2019). After the plants were transplanted in the same area, some were healthy, some were lightly diseased, and some were heavily diseased, which seems stochastic. Once pathogens occur in plant tissues, root exudates will be influenced (Gulati et al., 2020). Root exudates have specialized roles in nutrient cycling and signal transduction between a root and its surrounding soil (Jonasson et al., 1999), as well as in plant responses to environmental stresses (Liu et al., 2020). Root exudates play essential roles in the root-root, root-microbe, and microbe-microbe interactions (Bais et al., 2004). Some secretions, e.g., cutin, are screened against plant pathogens (Maurel et al., 1994). The diversity and stability of normal plant flora are other factors to inhibit or kill pathogens (Tilman and Downing, 1994; Tilman et al., 1997; Fitter et al., 2005). Generally, the more closely and stable this system is, the stronger its protective ability is. Also, probiotics and their secondary metabolites play important roles in decreasing the infection of pathogens (Fravel, 1988; Howell, 2003). A well-conditioned cycle should be that normal root exudates improve soil nutrients and soil microecological environments and are beneficial for probiotics to grow, which protects the plant from pathogen infection and accelerates plant growth. Otherwise, a vicious cycle may be that the changed and bad root exudates, as toxic resources, decrease soil nutrients, promote pathogen growth, inhibit probiotics, destroy the stability of soil microecology, and further aggravate the plant disease. Therefore, although the appearance of pathogens or their types is random, the plant-soil-microbe interaction determines the colonization of pathogens and the occurrence of plant diseases.

Analyses of high-throughput sequencing data suggested that Actinobacteria (e.g., Amycolatopsis, Lentzea, Arthrobacter Mycobacterium, and Streptomyces) and their biosynthesis of antimicrobial peptides (e.g., ansamycins, novobiocin, streptomycin, tetracycline) played crucial roles in inhibiting both TBS and TBW. We further emphasized that some isolated Actinobacteria and some antimicrobial peptides (e.g., novobiocin, streptomycin) could inhibit both P. nicotianae HD1. and R. solanacearum GMI1000. The researches for Actinobacteria as biological control agents of plant disease are of interest, given their ability to colonize healthy plant tissues and produce antibiotics in situ (Trujillo et al., 2015; Jose et al., 2021; Yadav et al., 2021). For example, Streptomyces isolated from healthy banana plants could produce antifungal molecules that inhibited the growth of Fusarium oxysporum (Cao et al., 2005). Yacine et al. (2014) found that Streptomyces were isolated from tomatoes and native plants of the Algerian Sahara and screened for biocontrol activity against Rhizotocnia solani. Actinobacteria are the source of two-thirds of naturally derived antibiotics and a range of antihelminthic, antifungal, antibacterial, anticancer, and immunosuppressive drugs (Ventura et al., 2007). The impressive list of important anti-infective compounds synthesized by Actinobacteria includes streptomycin, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, novobiocin, ansamycins, erythromycin, vancomycin, and kanamycin, and some of these (e.g., ansamycins) are broad-spectrum antibiotics (Mahajan and Balachandran, 2012). Our pot experiment also showed Streptomyces acidiscabies 4-9 could effectively control TBW and TBS. Therefore, some broad-spectrum Actinobacteria may be biocontrol agents for both tobacco bacterial and fungal diseases in the future. However, since in the final pot experiments sterilized soil was applied and heavy inoculation with selected Streptomyces strains was used, there is still a long way to a practical application of Streptomyces strains for biocontrol of wilt and black shark diseases of tobacco.

Conclusions

Compared with healthy plants, the composition and structure of rhizosphere soil microbial communities showed some differences in diseased plants infected with TBW or TBSwith decreased species diversity, destructive networks, and decreased functionality involved in the biosynthesis of antibiotics, which might be the characteristics of the diseased soils. Actinobacteria (e.g., Amycolatopsis, Arthrobacter Mycobacterium, Streptomyces) were the effective probiotics, and their biosynthesis of antimicrobial peptides (e.g., novobiocin and streptomycin) played crucial roles in controlling the growth of bacterial and fungal pathogens.

Data availability statement

The data presented in the study are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI repository, accession number PRJNA899683.

Author contributions

WC and QT contributed to the study’s conception and design. Research, material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by TL, KT, ZX, and HC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YX. TL, QT, YW and WC commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by the key Research project of Hunan Province (2021NK1040), the key project of Science and Technology Project of China National Tobacco Corporation [110202101050 (LS-10) and 110202201019 (LS-03)], the key project of Science and Technology of Hunan Branch of China National Tobacco Corporation (CS2022KJ02 and XX2022-2024Aa01), Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Hunan Province (21A0142).

Acknowledgments

Hunan Engineering & Technology Research Center for Agricultural Big Data Analysis & Decision-making, and Tobacco Technology Center of Xiangxi provided field space.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1200136/full#supplementary-material

References

Bacon, C. W., White, J. F. (2016). Functions, mechanisms and regulation of endophytic and epiphytic microbial communities of plants. Symbiosis 68, 87–98. doi: 10.1007/s13199-015-0350-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bais, H. P., Park, S., Weir, T. L., Callaway, R. M., Vivanco, J. M. (2004). How plants communicate using the underground information superhighway. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.11.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barberán, A., Ramirez, K. S., Leff, J. W., Bradford, M. A., Wall, D. H., Fierer, N. (2014). Why are some microbes more ubiquitous than others? predicting the habitat breadth of soil bacteria. Ecol. Lett. 17, 794–802. doi: 10.1111/ele.12282

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, X., Landick, R., Campbell, E. A. (2022). A roadmap for designing narrow-spectrum antibiotics targeting bacterial pathogens. Microbial Cell 9, 136–138. doi: 10.15698/mic2022.07.780

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, L., Qiu, Z., You, J., Tan, H., Zhou, S. (2005). Isolation and characterization of endophytic streptomycete antagonists of fusarium wilt pathogen from surface-sterilized banana roots. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 247, 147. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.05.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, K., Choi, J., Lee, P. A., Roy, N., Khan, R., Lee, H. J., et al. (2020). Alteration of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato plant by microbiota transplant. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, P., Fan, F., Yin, C., Song, A., Huang, P., Tang, Y. J., et al. (2016). Long-term organic and inorganic fertilization alters temperature sensitivity of potential N2O emissions and associated microbes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 93, 131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, Y., He, Z., Xu, M., Qin, Y., Van Nostrand, J. D., Wu, L. Y., et al. (2012). Elevated carbon dioxide alters the structure of soil microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 2991–2995. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06924-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deverall, B. J. (1987). Book review - mechanisms of resistance to plant diseases. Australas. Plant Pathol. 16, 68. doi: 10.1071/APP9870068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dunne, C., Crowley, J. J., Moenne-Loccoz, Y., Dowling, D. N., Bruijn, S., Fergal, O. (1997). Biological control of Pythium ultimum by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia W81 is mediated by an extracellular proteolytic activity. Microbiology 143, 3921–3931. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-12-3921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fitter, A. H., Gilligan, C. A., Hollingworth, K., Kleczkowski, A., Twyman, R. M., Pitchford, J. W. (2005). Biodiversity and ecosystem function in soil. Funct. Ecol. 19, 369–377. doi: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00969.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fravel, D. R. (1988). Role of antibiosis in the biocontrol of plant diseases. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 26, 75–91. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.26.090188.000451

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Y., Wang, B., Xu, Z., Li, M., Song, Z., Li, W. Z., et al. (2015). Tobacco serine/threonine protein kinase gene NrSTK enhances black shank resistance. Genet. Mol. Res. 14, 16415. doi: 10.4238/2015.December.9.11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghodhbane-Gtari, F., Essoussi, I., Chattaoui, M., Chouaia, B., Jaouani, A., Daffonchio, D., et al. (2010). Isolation and characterization of non-frankia actinobacteria from root nodules of Alnus glutinosa, Casuarina glauca and Elaeagnus angustifolia. Symbiosis 50, 51–57. doi: 10.1007/s13199-009-0029-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gómez-Gómez, L., Boller, T. (2002). Flagellin perception: a paradigm for innate immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 251–256. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02261-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gu, Y., Liu, Y., Li, J., Cao, M., Wang, Z., Li, J., et al. (2022). Mechanism of intermittent deep tillage and different depths improving crop growth from the perspective of rhizosphere soil nutrients, root system architectures, bacterial communities, and functional profiles. Front. Microbiol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.759374

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gulati, S., Ballhausen, M., Kulkarni, P., Grosch, R., Garbeva, P. (2020). A non-invasive soil-based setup to study tomato root volatiles released by healthy and infected roots. Sci. Rep. 10, 12704. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69468-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, T., You, C., Zhang, L., Feng, C., Zhang, C., Wang, J., et al. (2016). Biocontrol potential of antagonist bacillus subtilis Tpb55 against tobacco black shank. BioControl 61, 195–205. doi: 10.1007/s10526-015-9705-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Horst, R. K. (1990). Plant diseases and their pathogens. In: Westcott’s Plant Disease Handbook. (Boston, MA: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8143-7_4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Howell, C. R. (2003). Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis. 87, 4–10. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, J., Shew, H. D. (2021). Components of aggressiveness in Phytophthora nicotianae during adaptation to multiple sources of partial resistance in tobacco. Plant Dis. 105, 1960–1966. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-20-1929-RE

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jonasson, S., Michelsen, A., Schmidt, I. K., Nielsen, E. V. (1999). Responses in microbes and plants to changed temperature, nutrient, and light regimes in the arctic. Ecology 80, 1828. doi: 10.2307/176661

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jose, P. A., Maharshi, A., Jha, B. (2021). Actinobacteria in natural products research: progress and prospects. Microbiological Res. 246, 126708. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126708

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keen, N. T., Bent, A., Staskawicz, B. (1993). Plant disease resistance genes: interactions with pathogens and their improved utilization to control plant diseases. Discrete Appl. Mathematics 157, 341–352. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-77120-3_31

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, B., Park, A. R., Song, C. W., Song, H., Kim, J. (2022). Biological control efficacy and action mechanism of Klebsiella pneumoniae JCK-2201 producing meso-2,3-Butanediol against tomato bacterial wilt. Front. Microbiol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.914589

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kwak, M., Kong, H. G., Choi, K., Kwon, S., Song, J. Y., Lee, J., et al. (2018). Rhizosphere microbiome structure alters to enable wilt resistance in tomato. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1100–1109. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4232

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kyselková, M., Kopecký, J., Frapolli, M., Défago, G., Ságovámarecková, M., Grundmann, G. L., et al. (2009). Comparison of rhizobacterial community composition in soil suppressive or conducive to tobacco black root rot disease. Isme J. 3, 1127–1138. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.61

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langille, M. G. I., Zaneveld, J., Caporaso, J. G., Mcdonald, D., Knights, D., Joshua, R., et al. (2013). Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 814–821. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, C. H., Chen, X., Liu, T. T., Lian, B., Gu, Y., Caer, V., et al. (2007). Study of the antifungal activity of Acinetobacter baumannii LCH001 in vitro and identification of its antifungal components. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 76, 459–466. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1010-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, T., Xiao, Y., Yin, J., Yi, T., Zhou, Z., Hsiang, T., et al. (2020). Effects of cultured root and soil microbial communities on the disease of nicotiana tabacum caused by Phytophthora nicotianae. Front. Microbiol. 11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00929

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W., Zhao, Q., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Xu, N., Qu, Q., et al. (2020). Enantioselective effects of imazethapyr on arabidopsis thaliana root exudates and rhizosphere microbes. Sci. Total Environ. 716, 137121. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, L., Zhang, H., Zhou, X., Yang, C., Zheng, S., Duo, J. L., et al. (2018). Biological control tobacco bacterial wilt and black shank and root colonization by bio-organic fertilizer containing bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa NXHG29. Appl. Soil Ecol. 129, 136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.05.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahajan, G. B., Balachandran, L. (2012). Antibacterial agents from actinomycetes - a review. Front. Bioscience 4 (1), 240–53. doi: 10.2741/373

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maurel, C., Leblanc, N., Barbier-Brygoo, H., Perrot-Rechenmann, C., Bouvier-Durand, M., Guern, J. (1994). Alterations of auxin perception in rolB-transformed tobacco protoplasts (Time course of rolB mRNA expression and increase in auxin sensitivity reveal multiple control by auxin). Plant Physiol. 105, 1209–1215. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.4.1209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mengesha, W. K., Powell, S. M., Evans, K. J., Barry, K. M. (2017). Diverse microbial communities in non-aerated compost teas suppress bacterial wilt. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33 (3), 49. doi: 10.1007/s11274-017-2212-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miliute, I., Buzaite, O., Baniulis, D., Stanys, V. (2015). Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops and their role in stress tolerance: a review. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 102, 465–478. doi: 10.13080/z-a.2015.102.060

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niu, J., Chao, J., Xiao, Y., Chen, W., Zhang, C., Liu, X., et al. (2017). Insight into the effects of different cropping systems on soil bacterial community and tobacco bacterial wilt rate. J. Basic Microbiol. 57, 3–11. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201600222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ojiambo, P. S., Scherm (2006). Biological and application-oriented factors influencing plant disease suppression by biological control: a meta-analytical review. Phytopathology. 96 (11), 1168–1174. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-1168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rasmussen, P. U., Bennett, A. E., Tack, A. J. M. (2019). The impact of elevated temperature and drought on the ecology and evolution of plant–soil microbe interactions. J. Ecol. 108, 337–352. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13292

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, X., Wang, J., Zhu, F., Wang, Z., Mei, J., Xie, Y., et al. (2022). β-aminobutyric acid (BABA)-induced resistance to tobacco black shank in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum l.). PloS One 17, e267960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267960

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schreiter, S., Babin, D., Smalla, K., Grosch, R. (2018). Rhizosphere competence and biocontrol effect of Pseudomonas sp. RU47 independent from plant species and soil type at the field scale. Front. Microbiol. 9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shanks, R. M. Q., Dashiff, A., Alster, J. S., Kadouri, D. E. (2012). Isolation and identification of a bacteriocin with antibacterial and antibiofilm activity from Citrobacter freundii. Arch. Microbiol. 194, 575–587. doi: 10.1007/s00203-012-0793-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, M., Shi, Y., Bo, G., Liu, X. (2022). Fungal inhibition of agricultural soil pathogen stimulated by nitrogen-reducing fertilization. Front. Bioengineering Biotechnol. 10. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.866419

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheng, X. F., Jiang, C. Y., He, L. Y. (2008). Characterization of plant growth-promoting Bacillus edaphicus NBT and its effect on lead uptake by Indian mustard in a lead-amended soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 54, 417–422. doi: 10.1139/W08-020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, H., Xu, P., Wu, S., Yu, W., Cheng, Y., Chen, Z., et al. (2022). Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions. Sci. Rep. 12, 18309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20293-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stumbriene, K., Gudiukaite, R., Semaskiene, R., Svegzda, P., Jonaviciene, A., Suproniene, S. (2018). Screening of new bacterial isolates with antifungal activity and application of selected bacillus sp. cultures for biocontrol of Fusarium graminearum under field conditions. Crop Prot. 113, 22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.07.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, L., Zeng, W., Xiao, Y., Li, P., Gu, S., Wu, S., et al. (2021). Fungi-bacteria associations in wilt diseased rhizosphere and endosphere by interdomain ecological network analysis. Front. Microbiol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.722626

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tilman, D., Downing, J. A. (1994). Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367, 363–365. doi: 10.1038/367363a0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Reich, P., Ritchie, M., Siemann, E. (1997). The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Sci. (American Assoc. Advancement Science) 277, 1300–1302. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1300

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trujillo, M. E., Riesco, R., Benito, P., Carro, L. (2015). Endophytic actinobacteria and the interaction of micromonospora and nitrogen fixing plants. Front. Microbiol. 6. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01341

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ventura, M., Canchaya, C., Tauch, A., Chandra, G., Fitzgerald, G. F., Chater, K. F., et al. (2007). Genomics of actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71, 495–548. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00005-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F., van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2014). Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 5266–5270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320054111

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, K. L. C., Li, H., Ecker, J. R. (2002). Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell 14, S131–S151. doi: 10.1105/tpc.001768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Zhao, A., Morcillo, R. J. L., Yu, G., Xue, H., Rufian, J. S., et al. (2021). A bacterial effector protein uncovers a plant metabolic pathway involved in tolerance to bacterial wilt disease. Mol. Plant 14, 1281–1296. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.04.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, Y., Liu, X., Meng, D., Tao, J., Gu, Y., Yin, H., et al. (2018). The role of soil bacterial community during winter fallow period in the incidence of tobacco bacterial wilt disease. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102, 2399–2412. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8757-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yacine, G., Omrane, T., Amine, Y., Nasserdine, S., Florence, M., Abdelghani, Z. (2014). Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off and promotion of tomato plant growth by endophytic actinomycetes isolated from native plants of Algerian Sahara. Microbiological Res. 169 (1), 59–65. doi: 0.1016/j.micres.2013.06.014

Google Scholar

Yadav, K. K. (2021). Actinobacteria interventions in plant and environment fitness. Microbiomes and plant health. In: Solanki, M. K., Kashyap, P. L., Kumari, B. (Eds.), Panoply and their Applications. Academic Press, pp. 397–427. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819715-8.00014-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H., Li, J., Xiao, Y., Gu, Y., Liu, H., Liang, Y., et al. (2017). An integrated insight into the relationship between soil microbial community and tobacco bacterial wilt disease. Front. Microbiol. 8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02179

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, J., Carter, R. A., Vuagniaux, G., Barbier, M., Rosch, J. W., Rock, C. O., et al. (2016). A pathogen-selective antibiotic minimizes disturbance to the microbiome. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60, 4264–4273. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00535-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, H., Niu, J., Ren, Y., Cong, J., Zhang, X., Fan, F., et al. (2015). An integrated insight into the response of sedimentary microbial communities to heavy metal contamination. Sci. Rep. 5, 93–102. doi: 10.1038/srep14266

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, J., Zhang, Z., Guo, Y., Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Chen, W., et al. (2022). Precision probiotics in agroecosystems: multiple strategies of native soil microbiotas for conquering the competitor Ralstonia solanacearum. MSystems 7 (3), e01159–21. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01159-21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Liu, X., Zhou, L., Deng, L., Zhao, W., Liu, Y., et al. (2022). Alleviating soil acidification could increase disease suppression of bacterial wilt by recruiting potentially beneficial rhizobacteria. Microbiol. Spectr. 10 (2), e02333-21. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02333-21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., Han, X., Zhao, D., Wei, K., Yuan, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2021). Exploring biocontrol agents from microbial keystone taxa associated to suppressive soil: a new attempt for a biocontrol strategy. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.655673

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: bacterial wilt, black shank, actinobacteria, bacterial interaction, biosynthesis of antibiotics

Citation: Tang Q, Liu T, Teng K, Xiao Z, Cai H, Wang Y, Xiao Y and Chen W (2023) Microbial interactions and metabolisms in response to bacterial wilt and black shank pathogens in the tobacco rhizosphere. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1200136. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1200136

Received: 04 April 2023; Accepted: 31 May 2023;
Published: 20 June 2023.

Edited by:

Delong Meng, Central South University, China

Reviewed by:

Anton Hartmann, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany
Jing Cong, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, China

Copyright © 2023 Tang, Liu, Teng, Xiao, Cai, Wang, Xiao and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yunhua Xiao, huazipiaoling.123@163.com; Wu Chen, chenwuwarrior@163.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.