Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Plant Sci., 22 February 2023
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress
This article is part of the Research Topic Photosynthesis in a Changing Global Climate: a Matter of Scale, Volume II View all 5 articles

Editorial: Photosynthesis in a changing global climate: A matter of scale, volume II

  • 1Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Applied Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan
  • 2Centre d’Agrobiotechnologie et Bioingénierie, Unité de Recherche labellisée CNRST (Centre AgroBio-tech-URL-CNRST-05), Université Cadi Ayyad, Marrakech, Morocco
  • 3Laboratory of Agro-Food, Biotechnologies and Valorization of Plant Bioresources (AGROBIOVAL), Department of Biology, Faculty of Science Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University (UCA), Marrakesh, Morocco
  • 4Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States

Photosynthesis is the central process of all primary production in the biosphere. Photosynthesis in terrestrial plants absorbs nearly 123 Gt of atmospheric CO2 every year (C yr-1) and about half of the C fixed by leaves (c. 60 Gt C yr-1) is then returned to the atmosphere via autotrophic respiration (respiration by plant tissues) (Dusenge et al., 2019; Naseem et al., 2020; Walker et al., 2021). The CO2 assimilated by the photosynthetic apparatus is the basis of crop production and, therefore, all agricultural and human feed commodities. Over the last few years, numerous multidisciplinary research efforts have encouraged in-depth studies of the photosynthetic apparatus as a tool to increase the growth and production of plants under different environmental conditions. Photosynthesis is conditioned by the effect of environmental variables (water availability, temperature, [CO2], salinity, ozone, etc.) on light capture and utilization, the diffusion of CO2 from the atmosphere to the chloroplasts, the fixation of the CO2 by the enzyme Rubisco and the biochemical regeneration of the substrates of the Calvin Cycle (Long et al., 2015). Although it is generally accepted that stomatal closure is a target factor limiting photosynthetic activity under moderate stress conditions, when stress is more severe, it has been found that metabolic deterioration occurs. Variable phenotypic/genotypic responses to abiotic stress have been identified as targets to improve crop response to stress and as a tool to better understand the genetic mechanisms regulating such responses. Understanding the mechanisms and regulation of the photosynthetic processes together with the use of novel plant phenotyping technologies, specifically under abiotic stress conditions are crucial to identify novel targets/networks to improve photosynthetic efficiency. This understanding will ultimately lead toward designing and engineering crops that are adaptable to environmental changes in the realm of human population growth, globalization, and current and future climate change.

This Research Topic spans a range of studies at different levels of organization within photosynthetic research under a variety of environmental conditions geared towards improved yield and quality/functionality of plants grown under a changing global climate. The goals posed by four research groups using approaches from cell and molecular biology, genetics, biochemistry, structural biology, bioinformatics, eco-physiology, and engineering are focused on unraveling the complex network of genetic, biochemical, and metabolic interactions between the plant and the environment. An in-depth perspective article by Li et al. addresses the energy production (in)efficiency of plants and the energy cost of the process of respiration and maintenance under high-temperatures (HTs) conditions, and outlines strategies oriented toward engineering ‘smart crops’ with high energy utilization efficiency to reduce yield losses caused by HTs. Three research articles regarding this issue address topics related to the functional insights into the photosynthetic machinery and processes under abiotic stress conditions, as well as applied research aimed at mitigating the negative effects of climate change. These contributions concern both agronomic (e.g. rice and maize) and horticultural (e.g. citrus and orchid Phalaenopsis) -oriented materials research for a wide international audience. Jiang et al. provides insights into the molecular mechanism that contributes to drought tolerance of tetraploidy (vs. diploidy) in Citrus wilsonii. Through a combination of tools involving the use of microscopic observation, mRNAseq, phosphoproteomic, and hormonal quantification analyses, the authors reveal the synergistic regulation of photosynthesis, phosphorylation, and phytohormone accumulation in tetraploid tolerance to water limitations. Kang et al. describes short-term (substrate) and long-term (acclimation) effects of elevated CO2 (eCO2) on dynamic photosynthesis in two major C3 crop plants; rice and wheat, and the relative contribution of the acclimation and substrate effects of four different CO2 treatments on dynamic photosynthesis. In this study, neither an increased CO2 supply nor an acclimation to eCO2 imposes large influences on the photosynthetic induction rates, while an increased CO2 supply enhances photosynthetic C gain via improving steady-state net photosynthesis. These results provide a potential reason for the lower enhancement of yield in rice than in wheat under eCO2 conditions.

Addressing the abiotic stress responses in crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), among the three main metabolic adaptations for CO2 fixation found in plants, one paper focuses on understanding the chilling sensitivity in the CAM orchid Phalaenopsis. Daems et al. describe the effects of chilling temperatures on photosynthetic performance in tropical CAM plants by consideration of different aspects of photosynthesis, including light reactions and carbon fixation. Understanding the physiological responses of CAM plants to chilling will help facilitate the design and development of breeding strategies as well as enhance efforts to increase sustainability in the horticultural sector.

This Research Topic presents examples of cross-disciplinary research that have utilized concepts from multi-’omics’, experimental biology, and eco-physiology to illustrate how photosynthesis research can help to mitigate abiotic stresses and enhance food safety. We hope these exciting new works serve to inform, answer some long-standing questions (while raising many new ones), and inspire researchers in key areas of plant abiotic stress, climate change, and molecular biology. Please read and enjoy.

We encourage authors to continue to submit their best work in plant abiotic stress biology to The Frontiers in Plant Sciences.

Author contributions

All authors critically read and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Dusenge, M. E., Duarte, A. G., Way, D. A. (2019). Plant carbon metabolism and climate change: elevated CO2 and temperature impacts on photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration. New Phytol. 221 (1), 32–49. doi: 10.1111/nph.15283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Long, S. P., Marshall-Colon, A., Zhu, X. G. (2015). Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell 161, 56–66. doi: 10.1016/J.CELL.2015.03.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naseem, M., Osmanoglu, Ö., Dandekar, T. (2020). Synthetic rewiring of plant CO2 sequestration galvanizes plant biomass production. Trends Biotechnol. 38, 354–359. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Walker, A. P., De Kauwe, M. G., Bastos, A., Belmecheri, S., Georgiou, K., Keeling, R., et al. (2021). Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2. New Phytol. 229 (5), 2413–2445. doi: 10.1111/NPH.16866

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: photosynthesis, climate change, crops, abiotic stress, productivity

Citation: Baslam M and Sanz-Saez A (2023) Editorial: Photosynthesis in a changing global climate: A matter of scale, volume II. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1158816. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1158816

Received: 04 February 2023; Accepted: 15 February 2023;
Published: 22 February 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Lorenzo Ferroni, University of Ferrara, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Baslam and Sanz-Saez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Marouane Baslam, bW1tLmJhc2xhbUBnbWFpbC5jb20=; Alvaro Sanz-Saez, c2FuekBhdWJ1cm4uZWR1

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.