Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 02 February 2023
Sec. Crop and Product Physiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Amaranthus: Naturally Stress-Resistant Resources for Improved Agriculture and Human Health, Volume II View all 5 articles

Identification of genetic and biochemical mechanisms associated with heat shock and heat stress adaptation in grain amaranths

Alejandra Reyes-Rosales&#x;Alejandra Reyes-Rosales1†Gabriela Cabrales-Orona&#x;Gabriela Cabrales-Orona1†Norma A. Martínez-GallardoNorma A. Martínez-Gallardo1Lino Snchez-SeguraLino Sánchez-Segura1Jazmín P. Padilla-EscamillaJazmín P. Padilla-Escamilla1Paola A. Palmeros-Surez*Paola A. Palmeros-Suárez2*John P. Dlano-Frier*John P. Délano-Frier1*
  • 1Departamento de Biotecnología y Bioquímica, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Irapuato, Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico
  • 2Departamento de Producción Agrícola, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico

Heat stress is poised to become a major factor negatively affecting plant performance worldwide. In terms of world food security, increased ambient temperatures are poised to reduce yields in cereals and other economically important crops. Grain amaranths are known to be productive under poor and/or unfavorable growing conditions that significantly affect cereals and other crops. Several physiological and biochemical attributes have been recognized to contribute to this favorable property, including a high water-use efficiency and the activation of a carbon starvation response. This study reports the behavior of the three grain amaranth species to two different stress conditions: short-term exposure to heat shock (HS) conditions using young plants kept in a conditioned growth chamber or long-term cultivation under severe heat stress in greenhouse conditions. The latter involved exposing grain amaranth plants to daylight temperatures that hovered around 50°C, or above, for at least 4 h during the day and to higher than normal nocturnal temperatures for a complete growth cycle in the summer of 2022 in central Mexico. All grain amaranth species showed a high tolerance to HS, demonstrated by a high percentage of recovery after their return to optimal growing conditions. The tolerance observed coincided with increased expression levels of unknown function genes previously shown to be induced by other (a)biotic stress conditions. Included among them were genes coding for RNA-binding and RNA-editing proteins, respectively. HS tolerance was also in accordance with favorable changes in several biochemical parameters usually induced in plants in response to abiotic stresses. Conversely, exposure to a prolonged severe heat stress seriously affected the vegetative and reproductive development of all three grain amaranth species, which yielded little or no seed. The latter data suggested that the usually stress-tolerant grain amaranths are unable to overcome severe heat stress-related damage leading to reproductive failure.

Introduction

The genus Amaranthus consists of ca. 60-70 of annual herbaceous plants with C4 photosynthesis (Kadereit et al., 2003; Hernández-Ledesma et al., 2015; Das, 2016). They are further divided into three sub-genera; Amaranthus Albersia (vegetable amaranth), Amaranthus Amaranthus (grain amaranth) and Amaranthus Acnida (weedy amaranth) (Sauer, 1950; Mosyakin and Robertson, 1996; Das, 2016). Their agricultural importance as vegetable and/or grain crops or herbicide-resistant weeds is widely recognized, although they may also be used as ornamentals or as a source of pigments (Shukla et al., 2003; Tranel and Trucco, 2009; Shukla et al., 2010; Achigan-Dako et al., 2014; Teng et al., 2015; Joshi et al., 2018; Hoidal et al., 2019; Sarker and Oba, 2019). The three grain amaranth species, i.e., Amaranthus cruentus, A. hypochondriacus and A. caudatus, are greatly valued for their highly nutritional, protein-rich seeds that also possess several nutraceutical properties (Písaříková et al., 2005; Caselato-Sousa and Amaya-Farfán, 2012; Rastogi and Shukla, 2013; Venskutonis and Kraujalis, 2013; Montoya-Rodríguez et al., 2015; De Ron et al., 2017). They are native of the American continent, although their origin and taxonomic relationships remain uncertain (2020; Trucco and Tranel, 2011; Kietlinski et al., 2014; Adhikary and Pratt, 2015; Stetter and Schmid, 2017; Stetter et al., 2017, 2020; Wu and Blair, 2017).

Grain amaranths are climate-resilient and stress-tolerant plants able to withstand drought, salinity, heat and ultraviolet irradiance. They also sustain severe defoliation, insect and/or pathogen damage and thrive in poor soils and low-input agricultural systems. This resilience has been associated with various anatomical, physiological and biochemical adaptations (2014; 2015; Miller et al., 1984; Lal and Edwards, 1996; Brenner et al., 2000; Johnson and Henderson, 2002; Délano-Frier et al., 2004; Liu and Stützel, 2004; Sánchez-Hernández et al., 2004; Omami and Hammes, 2006; Omamt et al., 2006; Aguilar-Hernández et al., 2011; Huerta-Ocampo et al., 2011; Caselato-Sousa and Amaya-Farfán, 2012; Castrillón-Arbeláez et al., 2012; Vargas-Ortiz et al., 2013; Vargas-Ortiz et al., 2015; Casarrubias-Castillo et al., 2014; González-Rodríguez et al., 2019; Jamalluddin et al., 2019; Cisneros-Hernández et al., 2021). Additional data from a large-scale transcriptomic analysis of A. hypochondriacus plants revealed the presence several orphan or unknown function genes that changed their expression levels in response to diverse stress conditions (Délano-Frier et al., 2011), a number of which were found to significantly increase (a)biotic stress tolerance when over-expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana (Massange-Sánchez et al., 2015; Massange-Sánchez et al., 2016; Palmeros-Suárez et al., 2015; Palmeros-Suárez et al., 2017; Cabrales-Orona, 2016; Cabrales-Orona, 2017; Cabrales-Orona, 2016; Cabrales-Orona, 2017; Cabrales-Orona and Délano-Frier, 2021; Cabrales-Orona et al., 2022).

Tolerance to heat stress is becoming an agronomic trait of critical importance given the worrying predictions of an increasingly endangered food security caused by damaging high-temperature events linked to the rise in the average global temperatures (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2018). These will inevitably affect worldwide crop and ecosystem productivity considering the deleterious impact that high-temperature stress has on practically all facets of plant development, growth and reproduction (Dusenge et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019; Ortiz-Bobea et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2022). Several studies have reported heat-stress resilience in diverse amaranth species, which has been associated with their ability to repair damaged tissues and to re-establish normal cellular and metabolic functions after heat stress exposure (Gou and Al-Khatib, 2003; Moran and Showeler, 2005). Regarding the latter, a recent study found that heat shock (HS) and a combination of drought and HS had differential, species-specific effects, on three grain amaranths and A. spinosus, a weedy amaranth (Netshimbupfe et al., 2022). Thus, the higher heat and drought tolerance shown by A. cruentus and A. spinosus compared to A. caudatus and A. hypochondriacus was attributed to a more stress-resilient photosynthetic apparatus, in addition to augmented proline (Pro) accumulation, higher relative water contents and reduced oxidative damage.

The present study further examined the response of grain amaranth to different heat-related stress conditions. Recovery rates and plant fitness after short- and long-term exposure to high temperatures were also recorded. The latter, in order to explore the potential climate resilience of grain amaranths, defined as their ability to overcome high temperature-related damage once the plants return to preferable conditions. Thus, A. cruentus, A. caudatus and A. hypochondriacus plants were subjected to both short-term HS and extended heat stress treatments (see Geange et al., 2021). All grain amaranth species showed high recovery rates after ca. 26 to 30 h periods of exposure to 45°C, although recovery was species-dependent, being significantly higher in A. hypochondriacus. Higher recovery from HS coincided with definite expression patterns of unknown function genes, previously shown to be induced by several other abiotic stresses, during both the HS treatment and the recovery period. HS recovery was also concurrent with the activation of certain antioxidant enzymes and the accumulation, Pro, phenols flavonoids, non-structural carbohydrates and pigments. Despite the fact the fatality rates were low, the performance of grain amaranths was seriously affected when kept under long-term heat stress. The overall negative effects observed were species specific, and included substantial modifications in vegetative growth and reproductive fitness. The evidence gathered indicates that grain amaranth may be able to withstand short periods of high temperatures without suffering major fitness penalties, but not sustained heat stress. It further supports the notion that grain amaranths are climate resilient crops that, similarly to other emerging crops like fonio (Digitaria exilis), taro (Colocasia esculenta), quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and a perennial wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium), may readily adapt to the rapidly changing climatic conditions of the planet.

Materials and methods

A summary of the experimental design of the present study, involving the use of several analytical strategies, is shown in Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials

Plant material

Three grain amaranth species, Amaranthus hypochondriacus cv. “Revancha”, A. cruentus cv. “Dorada” and A. caudatus were employed in this study. Plants were reproduced from seed stocks that originated from certified seeds provided by Dr. Eduardo Espitia Rangel, INIFAP, México, curator of the Mexican amaranth germplasm collection. Grain amaranth plants were used for experimentation at different points after germination (see below). The plants were germinated and grown in a conditioned growth chamber maintained under controlled conditions of light (photosynthetically active radiation ≈ 300 μmol m−2 s−1) photoperiod and temperature (16 h light/8 h dark at constant 28°C), as described previously (Palmeros-Suárez et al., 2015).

Abiotic stress in grain amaranths: Salt and water deficit stress treatments

Five- to six-week-old A. hypochondriacus plants in the vegetative 2 (V2) stage, having 9-15 expanded leaves (Cisneros-Hernández et al., 2021) were used to perform water-deficit and salinity stress experiments, which were performed in the growth room conditions mentioned above. Ten to twelve plants per stress treatment were employed and each treatment was replicated twice. In brief, salt stress was imposed by watering the 1.3 L pots for eight consecutive days with 100 mL of a 400 mM NaCl solution. At this point, the electrical conductivity of the soil, measured at field capacity, was ≈ 6.8 dS/m. This is within the soil salinity range known to affect moderately salt-sensitive crops (http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4263e/y4263e0e.htm). Electrical conductivity was measured using a portable HI 98130 pH/conductivity/total dissolved solids water-proof tester (Hanna instruments Inc., Woonsocket, RI, USA). Control plants, maintained in the same conditions, were watered with deionized-distilled (dd) water only. The water deficit stress (WDS) treatments involved withholding irrigation for 8 days. The soil water potential gradually fell with increasing soil water loss as follows: -0.48 to -0.63 MPa, after 4 days; -0.96 to -1.057 MPa, after 6 days, and -1.45 to -1.68 MPa, after 8 days. The soil water potential was measured using an HR-33T dew point micro-voltmeter (Wescor Inc., Logan, UT, USA). Pools of combined leaf samples produced from two groups of three plants each were collected during both stress treatments at 4, 6 and 8 days and were immediately frozen in liquid N2 and subsequently stored at -80°C until required. Prior to analysis, the frozen samples were ground to a fine powder with mortar and pestle and under liquid N2.

Abiotic stress in grain amaranths: Heat shock treatment

Heat shock (HS) is defined as the short-term exposure of a plant to severe high temperatures. The exposure lasts for minutes to a few hours and the air temperature increase is often 20°C or higher than the temperature range required for optimal plant development and reproduction (Mittler et al., 2012). Thus, HS experiments were performed with A. hypochondriacus, A. cruentus and A. caudatus plants at the V1 development stage (Cisneros-Hernández et al., 2021) which defines grain amaranth plants having 6 to 8 expanded leaves. All HS experiments were performed in a growth chamber kept at 45°C and under constant illumination. The exposure time to 45°C was established independently for each grain amaranth species. It was determined by the hours needed to produce evident heat stress-related wilting in at least half of the population sample, which consisted of 30 plants. Thus, the HS treatments applied, at 45°C, were as follows: 26 h for A. cruentus and 30 h for A. hypochondriacus and A. caudatus. All plants were subsequently allowed to recover for 4 days under the optimal growth conditions mentioned above, time after which the percentage of plants that recovered was recorded. Additional time-course HS experiments were performed in which pooled leaf samples from 2 groups of 3 grain amaranth plants each were collected after different exposure periods to 45°C: 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 26 h, for A. cruentus, and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 30 h, for A. hypochondriacus and A. caudatus. Leaf samples of identical number of plants from all three grain amaranth species were also collected 1 and 3 and days after recovery.

Abiotic stress in grain amaranths: Long-term heat stress

Chronic heat stress experiments were performed with 12 plants of each of the three grain amaranth species examined. Plants were germinated in a germination tray as mentioned above. They were transplanted to 1.5 L pots filled with a general soil mix (Palmeros-Suárez et al., 2015) when the seedlings reached the V1 development stage, 32 days after germination. The plants were immediately transferred to the greenhouse where the heat stress experiment was conducted (see below) and maintained as such for 14 days. They were then transferred to 14 L plastic bags to finalize the stress treatment. The stress treatment had a duration of 63 days; it was started in August 1, 2022 and concluded in October 3, 2022. Seed harvest was done sometime later, between October 11 and November 15, 2022. The temperature and relative humidity (RH) inside the greenhouse were recorded daily in the early morning (7 a.m.), in mid-afternoon (3 p.m.) and in the evening (6:30 p.m.). The average temperatures and RHs for the duration of the stress treatment were the following: 23.9°C and 75%, at 7 a.m.; 52.6°C and 21%, at 3 p.m., and 38.5°C and 35%, at 6:30 p.m. The average temperatures and RHs under which non-stressed control plants were maintained for the same time span were the following: 21.7°C and 91%, at 7 a.m.; 35.2°C and 65%, at 3 p.m., and 32.6°C and 59%, at 6:30 p.m. Plant survival was recorded at the end of the experiment. Plant height was recorded thrice, 10, 22 and 57 days after the start of the stress treatment and leaf number was determined only once, after 57 days of stress. The days to panicle emergence and subsequent panicle growth, flowering and seed formation were also monitored. Photographic record of the control and stressed plants was performed twice, on September 22, 2022 and September 30, 2022. All plants were watered to field capacity for the duration of the experiment.

Quantitative PCR assays

Total RNA was extracted and purified from 100-200 mg of frozen and ground grain amaranth foliar tissues as described by Palmeros-Suárez et al. (2015). The integrity of the purified RNA was assessed by denaturing electrophoresis in ethidium bromide-containing formaldehyde/formamide 1% agarose gels, while RNA purity and concentration were determined in a NanoDrop 2000 apparatus (ThermoFisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA was synthesized from 4 μg of total RNA using 200 units of the SuperScript II reverse transcriptase as instructed by the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The cDNA produced was diluted 25-fold with dd water prior to quantitative PCR (qPCR) analyses, which were performed using SYBR Green detection chemistry and a CFX96 Real Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and the primers listed in Table S1 in Supplementary Materials. These were designed using the following programs: Primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3/), Beacon Designer (http://www.premierbiosoft.com), UNAFold (http://www.idtdna.com/UNAFold) and Oligo Evaluator (http://www.oligoevaluator.com) (Thornton and Basu, 2011). Reaction mixtures, 20 μL total volume, contained 2 μL cDNA solution, 4 μL of each 2 μM oligonucleotide solutions, 8 μL de Sybr Green Jumpstart TAQ Ready Mix (Sigma-Aldrich St. Louis, MO, USA) and 2 μL of sterile dd water. The amplification process was performed as follows: 15 min at 95°C to activate the Taq Polymerase, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (95°C/15 s) annealing (60°C/1 min) and extension (72°C/30 s) and a final extension step (60°C/1 min). The expression levels of several unknown function grain amaranth genes were determined in leaves of grain amaranth plants subjected to drought, salt and/or HS stress.

The criteria used to select the genes tested were the following: 1) Previous experimental evidence of their induced expression in response to several (a)biotic stress conditions in grain amaranth (Délano-Frier et al., 2011) and other plants, and 2) presumable participation in the regulation and/or responses designed to protect plants from heat-related stress conditions. The analysis included AhHAB4-PAI-1 (Phytozome 13, v2.1, accession number: AH018279) coding for an RNA- and hyaluronan-binding protein; AhRIP (Phytozome 13, v2.1, accession number: AH007263) coding for an RNA-editing factor interacting protein involved in chloroplast and mitochondrial RNA editing, similar to a protein recently found to participate in mitochondrial development in salt-stressed A. thaliana (Jiang et al., 2021); Ah2880 (Phytozome 13, v2.1, accession number: AH015341) coding for a small unknown function protein that, similarly to AhRIP, was shown to be differentially induced in grain amaranths by various biotic and abiotic stress conditions (Délano-Frier et al., 2011; Cabrales-Orona and Délano-Frier, 2021); AhBAMY (Phytozome 13, v2.1, accession number: AH001114), coding for a β-amylase that was shown to provide heat stress-resistance when over-expressed in A. thaliana (Cabrales-Orona, 2016); AhDGR2 (Phytozome 13, v2.1, accession number: AH015369) coding for a DUF642 protein that altered root growth and cell wall structure when overexpressed in transgenic A. thaliana plants (Palmeros-Suárez et al., 2017); AhTIL (Phytozome 13, v2.1, accession number: AH014131) coding for a temperature-induced lipocalin, similar to proteins known to provide thermo-tolerance in A. thaliana (Chi et al., 2009); AhERD (Phytozome 13, v2.1, accession number: AH006452), coding for a senescence/dehydration-associated protein similar to EARLY RESPONSIVE TO DEHYDRATION 7, ERD7, one of several proteins identified in lipid droplets, i,e. neutral-lipid-containing organelles isolated from drought-stressed A. thaliana leaves (Doner et al., 2021), and AhOEE (Phytozome 13, v2.1, accession number: AH015200), coding for an oxygen evolving enhancer protein found to be strongly affected by (a)biotic stresses in A. hypochondriacus (Délano-Frier et al., 2011). This protein is similar to a photosystem II component that regulates the function of photosystem II, via the optimization of the manganese cluster during water photolysis, in A. thaliana and tobacco (Heide et al., 2004). It is also presumed to protect the D1 reaction center against oxidative damage during drought and heat stress in different algal and plant models (Yamamoto, 2001; Kim et al., 2015; Cevik et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021a). The expression levels of these genes were normalized in relation to their expression in leaves of control plants, which was set to a value of 1.0. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT comparative cycle threshold method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). The genes employed as normalizing controls were the AhACT7 actin and Ahβ-tubulin housekeeping genes. In all cases, leaves for qPCR assays were obtained from the grain amaranth plant pools generated during the stress treatments, as described above. Each pool was subsequently subjected to four independent sampling procedures prior to analysis. qPCR data are reported as the mean of 4 technical replicates ± SE of each experiment. qRT-PCR expression analyses were validated in two independent experiments.

Measurement of biochemical parameters

Several biochemical parameters were analyzed in grain amaranth plants subjected to HS and recovery treatments. The methods used were described previously by Cabrales-Orona et al. (2022) and Portillo-Nava et al. (2021). These included the following: total betalains, carotenes and chlorophyll; soluble and insoluble non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs) and Pro levels and total phenols and flavonoids.

The same extracts used for the analysis of total phenol and flavonoid leaf contents (Sakanaka et al., 2005) were used for the subsequent HPLC analysis of phenylpropanoids and phenolic acids (method 1, M1) and flavonoids (method 2, M2), respectively. These analyses were performed only with leaf extracts obtained from A. hypochondriacus plants maintained in optimal conditions, subjected to HS for 30 h or after a 3-day recovery period following HS. M1 was performed on a 250 × 4.6 mm I.D. (particle size, 5µm; pore size, 120Å) YMC-Pack ODS-AM reversed-phase C18 column (YMC CO., LTD., Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a C18 guard cartridge, using an Agilent 1200 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, CA, USA). The temperature of the column oven was kept at 25°C. A gradient elution was employed with a mobile phase consisting of 1% glacial acetic acid (solution A) and HPLC-grade acetonitrile (solution B) as follows: linear gradient to 5% B, 0-5 min; linear gradient from 5% B to 10% B, 5-10 min; linear gradient from 10% B to 15% B, 10-30 min; isocratic elution at 15% B, 30-40 min; linear gradient from 15% B to 50% B, 40-60 min, and linear gradient from 50% B to 100% B, 60-90 min. A 2 min post-time linear gradient from 100% B to 0% B was included before the next injection. The mobile phase flow rate and the sample injection volume were 1.0 mL/min and 10 μL, respectively. All quantifications were based on peak areas. Gallic acid (retention time, [Rt], 9.36 min), hydroxybenzoic acid (Rt, 18.65 min), chlorogenic acid (Rt, 19.97 min), catechin (Rt, 19.77 min), vanillic acid (Rt, 22.07 min), caffeic acid (Rt, 23.68 min), epicathequin (Rt, 26.74 min), vanillin (Rt, 29.04 min), coumaric acid (Rt, 33.15 min), rutin (Rt, 83.89 min), myricetin (Rt, 83.90 min) and kaempferol (Rt, 83.92) were used as standards.

M2 was performed on a 150 × 4.6 mm I.D. (particle size, 5 µm; pore size, 120Å) Zorbax Eclipse XDB reversed-phase C18 column (Agilent Technologies) equipped with a C18 guard cartridge, using an Agilent 1200 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies). The temperature of the column oven was kept at 25°C. A gradient elution was employed with a mobile phase consisting of water: acetic acid: acetonitrile (88:2:10 v/v/v; solution A) and water: acetic acid: HPLC-grade acetonitrile (8:2:90 v/v/v; solution B) as follows: linear gradient to 15% B, 0-5 min; linear gradient from 15% B to 50% B, 5-20 min; linear gradient from 50% B to 70% B, 20-25 min; linear gradient from 70% B to 100% B, 25-30 min; isocratic elution at 100% B, 30-40 min. A 5 min post-time linear gradient from 100% B to 0% B was included before the next injection. The mobile phase flow rate and the sample injection volume were 1.0 mL/min and 20 μL, respectively. All quantifications were based on peak areas. Chlorogenic acid (Rt, 3.95 min), catechin (Rt, 5.15 min), rutin (Rt, 6.99 min), myricetin (Rt, 9.78 min) and kaempferol (Rt, 15.39) were used as standards.

Antioxidant enzymes and H2O2

Catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione reductase (GR) enzyme activities, as well as hydrogen peroxide levels, were also determined. The enzymology methods employed were previously described by Cabrales-Orona et al. (2022) and Palmeros-Suárez et al. (2015). H2O2 was determined by the colorimetric quantification of a xylenol orange and ferric iron complex produced after the peroxide-dependent oxidation of ferrous iron (National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA, USA).

Statistical analysis

All the experiments were performed using a completely randomized design with at least 6 plants per genotype. Data generated were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to examine: 1) the effect of HS stress on the expression levels of the 8 unknown function genes in grain amaranth plants; 1) the significance of the extent of recovery observed after HS, and 3) the effect on various biochemical variables recorded in grain amaranth plants subjected to HS. The means were compared using the Tukey-Kramer test to identify statistically significant differences between them. The statistical analysis was performed with the aid of R (http://r-project.org/) Rstudio (https://www.rstudio.com) and JMT Pro13 (jmp.com) statistical software.

Results

Responsiveness of selected grain amaranth unknown function genes to high salt and water-deficit stresses

Further analysis of four stress-responsive unknown function genes was performed in this work. The selected genes (i.e., AhHAB4-PAI-1, AhBAMY, AhTIL and AhOEE) were subjected to excess salt and WDS treatments to corroborate the only reported evidence of their responsiveness to these compromising conditions (Délano-Frier et al., 2011). Thus, the results from the quantitative gene expression assays shown in Figure 1C show that AhBAMY was strongly induced by salt stress, reaching ca. 6-fold higher expression levels at the end of the treatment. Conversely AhTIL (Figure 1D) was weakly induced after 8 days of salt stress, whereas AhOEE, and particularly AhHAB4-PAI-1, were repressed (Figures 1A, B). AhOEE was negatively affected by WDS, becoming repressed by the sixth day of WDS exposure, whereas AhHAB4-PAI-1 responded positively to WDS, reaching more than 2-fold higher expression levels at the same time point (Figures 1A, B). AhTIL and AhBAMY were more responsive to WDS than to salt stress, with both genes reaching highest expression levels 4 days after water was withheld from the plants. AhBAMY, in particular, showed a heightened response to these two stress conditions, particular WDS (Figures 1C, D).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Effect of high salt and water-deficit stress on the expression levels of four grain amaranth unknown function genes. Relative gene expression was quantified in leaves of grain amaranth plants subjected to high salt or water deficit stress for 4, 6 and 8 days, respectively. The three recognized grain amaranth species were analyzed: Amaranthus hypochondriacus cv. Revancha, A cruentus cv. Dorada and A caudatus. Foliar RNA was employed for the qRT-PCR analysis of presumably stress-inducible unknown function genes, namely: (A) AhHAB4-PAI-1; (B) AhOEE; (C) AhBAMY, and (D) AhTIL. Threshold cycles (CT) values for all genes were normalized to the CT value of the AhACT7 and AhEF1a housekeeping genes. Changes in gene expression were calculated from 4 technical replicates of pools prepared from 10-to-12 plants sampled per time point using the 2-ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Different letters over the box-and-whisker plots, showing high, low, and median values, represent statistically significant differences; one-way ANOVA and Tukey Kramer test, P < 0.05.

Responsiveness of selected grain amaranth unknown function genes to heat shock and subsequent recovery

The foliar expression of all the unknown function grain amaranth genes tested in plants exposed to HS and subsequent recovery was distinctly different (Table 1). HS tolerance in the three grain amaranth species was associated with an early induction of the RNA binding (AhHAB4-PAI-1) and RNA editing (AhRIP) genes. These were found to peak between 3 and 6 h after the start of the HS treatment followed by a gradual decrease of their expression levels that extended to the end of the HS treatments (i.e., 26 to 30 h). These diminished gene expression levels were, nevertheless, still significantly higher than those recorded in control plants. A stronger induction of these two genes, and of AhHAB4-PAI-1 in particular, was also detected during the recovery period, especially 1 day after returning to optimal conditions. The AhERD gene was also found to be extensively induced in response to the HS treatment in all grain amaranths. However, contrary to the latter two genes, the expression levels were much more intensely induced during the early stages of the HS treatment, except in A. caudatus, rather than during recovery. AhTIL and AhDGR produced expression patterns that were similar to AhERD, being expressed almost exclusively during HS conditions, mostly at early time points, and remaining unchanged, and even repressed in A. cruentus and A. hypochondriacus, during the late HS stages and/or the recovery periods. The expression pattern of these genes in A. caudatus differed again from those recorded in the other two species. Ah2880 was exclusively induced during the HS stress, but contrary to the above three genes, its induction was detected at the late stages of the HS treatment. AhBAMY was transiently expressed within the first 12 h of the HS treatment and was later extensively repressed, except for the brief induction recorded 1 day after recovery in A. hypochondriacus. Finally, a strong repression of the AhOEE gene was first observed 6 h after the onset of the HS treatment in A. cruentus and A. caudatus; this effect extended for the rest of the HS treatment and included the recovery period. In contrast, AhOEE was induced within the first 12 h of HS stress in A. hypochondriacus and subsequently returned to levels that were no different from those recorded in control plants, except for a short-lived repression observed 24 h after HS treatment.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Effect of heat shock and subsequent recovery on the expression of grain amaranth unknown function genes.

The highest recovery to HS, detected in A. hypochondriacus (Figures 2A, B), coincided with defined differences in the magnitude and timing of two of the genes analyzed: 1) a longer induction period of AhHAB4-PAI-1 during HS, which was sustained for 24 h, in addition to very high expression levels during the early recovery period, which were ca. 2-fold higher than those recorded in the other two grain amaranth species, and 2) a prolonged induction of the AhOEE gene, which remained induced for 12 h under HS, compared to A. cruentus and A. caudatus, where the expression of this gene began to be strongly repressed by the sixth hour of HS stress.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Heat shock tolerance of young grain amaranth plants. (A) Young grain amaranth plants, at the vegetative 1 stage of development, were placed in growth chamber and subjected to different heat shock (HS) periods, at 45°C and constant light: 30 h (Amaranthus hypochondriacus and (A caudatus) and 26 h (A. cruentus). The aspect of the stressed plants (HS, middle panel) was compared with untreated control, (C), plants maintained in optimal growing conditions (left-hand panel) and with plants that recovered from HS, shown after a 3-day period in optimal conditions (R3, right-hand panel). (B) The box-and-whisker plots show the percentage of recovery recorded in each of the three grain amaranth species analyzed. Different letters over the box-and-whisker plots, showing high, low, and median values, represent statistically significant differences; one-way ANOVA and Tukey Kramer test, P < 0.05 (n = 30).

Biochemical changes produced in heat-shocked grain amaranth plants: Non-structural carbohydrates and Pro

Most biochemical responses activated in response to heat stress shared a certain degree of similarity in A. hypochondriacus and A. cruentus and tended to differ, in some cases notably, in A. caudatus. Glucose (Glc) levels were reduced ca. 2 to 10-fold in heat-shocked A. hypochondriacus and A. cruentus plants (Figure 3A). The decrease in fructose (Fru) and starch contents followed a similar pattern, except in A. cruentus plants, where these NSCs increased to levels similar to, or higher (i.e., starch, at 12 h), than those detected in untreated plants during the final stages of the HS treatment (24 to 26 h) (Figures 3B, D). In contrast, a consistent increase of Glc, Fru and starch, that was first detected 12 h after the start of the HS treatment and persisted until its termination, was observed in A. caudatus. No species-specific differences were observed for sucrose (Suc), whose HS-induced levels started to increase significantly after 12 h and gradually reached maximum levels at the end of the HS treatment (Figure 3C). Non-species-specific effects also included the reduction of NSC contents that was recorded during the recovery period, as follows: i) a peak of Glc and Fru levels occurring 1 day after recovery followed to a return to control levels after day 3; ii) maximum starch accumulation, 1 day (in A. caudatus) or 3 days (in A. hypochondriacus and A. cruentus) after recovery (Figures 3A, B, D), and iii) the return of Suc to similar, or slightly higher levels, than those detected in control untreated plants (Figure 3C). Parallel to Suc, Pro accumulated at the final stages of the HS treatment and returned to levels similar to those in untreated control plants during the recovery period (Figure 3E).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Fluctuation in the levels of non-structural carbohydrates and proline recorded during heat shock and subsequent recovery in grain amaranth plants. Changes in the levels of (A) glucose, (B) fructose, (C) sucrose, (D) starch and (E) proline detected in leaves sampled from grain amaranth plants at the V1 development stage subjected to heat shock (HS) for 0, 1,3, 6, 12, 24, 26 (Amaranthus cruentus) or 30 h (A. hypochondriacus and A caudatus) and after 1 (1 d R) and 3 (3 d R) days of recovery from HS under optimal conditions. The bars represent the mean value (n = 30) ± SE. Asterisks over the bars represent statistically significant differences within species at P ≤ 0.05 (*), P ≤ 0.01 (**) or P ≤ 0.001 (***); one-way ANOVA and Tukey Kramer test.

Total pigments: Carotenes, chlorophyll and betalains

HS-induced changes in total carotene content differed between species (Figure 4A). In A. hypochondriacus, carotene content reached significantly higher levels than untreated controls 6 to 24 h after HS, only to decline at the end of the HS treatment and during recovery. In A. cruentus, total carotene content remained mostly unchanged during HS and peaked briefly, 1 day after recovery, whereas carotene content was similarly unaffected by HS in A. caudatus but was reduced during recovery. In all grain amaranths, carotene content was significantly lower than untreated controls 3 days after recovery. Total chlorophyll steadily increased concomitantly with HS, for the duration of the treatment in A. hypochondriacus and A. cruentus, and only for the first 6 h of HS exposure in A. caudatus (Figures 4B). Chlorophyll contents were reduced to similar or lower levels than those detected in untreated controls during the recovery period. Betalain pigments, and their betalamic acid precursor, showed a similar accumulation pattern, gradually increasing concomitantly with the duration of the HS treatment followed by a drastic reduction occurring 1 and/or 3 days after recovery (Figures 4C–E). HS-induced betalain pigment accumulation was ostensibly weaker in A. caudatus.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Fluctuation in the levels of different pigments recorded during heat shock and subsequent recovery in grain amaranth plants. Changes in the levels of (A) total carotenes, (B) total chlorophyll, (C) betalamic acid, (D) betaxanthins and (E) betacyanins detected in leaves sampled from grain amaranth plants at the V1 development stage subjected to heat shock (HS) for 0, 1,3, 6, 12, 24, 26 (Amaranthus cruentus) or 30 h (A. hypochondriacus and A caudatus) and after 1 (1 d R) and 3 (3 d R) days of recovery from HS under optimal conditions. The bars represent the mean value (n = 30) ± SE. Asterisks over the bars represent statistically significant differences within species at P ≤ 0.05 (*), P ≤ 0.01 (**) or P ≤ 0.001 (***); one-way ANOVA and Tukey Kramer test.

Total phenols and flavonoids, antioxidant enzyme activity and H2O2 accumulation

Total phenols and flavonoids gradually increased in response to HS in all grain amaranths tested and peaked at the latter stages of their respective treatments. Flavonoid and phenol levels did not increase further during recovery, but remained significantly higher than those detected in untreated control plants, except in A. hypochondriacus and A. caudatus sampled 1 and 3 days after recovery, respectively (Figures 5A, B). This tendency was replicated in the HPLC analysis of A. hypochondriacus leaf extracts obtained from control and heat-shocked plants, respectively, sampled at the end of the HS treatments and after a 3-day recovery period. Thereby, the results shown in Tables S2, S3 indicate that the leaves of heat-shocked plants produced the largest number of peaks, the majority of which had higher peak areas than those detected in control and recovered plant leaf samples. Only a handful of peaks were more abundant, or exclusive of, control and/or recovered plants. Curiously, none of the most abundant peaks produced in response to HS could be identified by comparison with the retention times of standard compounds. Also, the presence of late-eluting peaks using the M2 separation was indicative of possible modifications of phenols and/or flavonoids by methylation, acylation, glycosylation, conjugation, oxidation and/or other chemical reactions. The identification of these compounds is now in progress.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Fluctuation in the levels of antioxidant compounds and enzymes recorded during heat shock and subsequent recovery in grain amaranth plants. Changes in the levels of (A) total flavonoids, (B) total phenols, (C) glutathione reductase, GR, activity (D) superoxide dismutase, SOD, activity and (E) catalase, CAT, detected in leaves sampled from grain amaranth plants at the V1 development stage subjected to heat shock (HS) for 0, 1,3, 6, 12, 24, 26 (Amaranthus cruentus) or 30 h (A. hypochondriacus and A caudatus) and after 1 (1 d R) and 3 (3 d R) days of recovery from HS under optimal conditions. The bars represent the mean value (n = 30) ± SE. Asterisks over the bars represent statistically significant differences within species at P ≤ 0.05 (*), P ≤ 0.01 (**) or P ≤ 0.001 (***); one-way ANOVA and Tukey Kramer test.

Antioxidant enzyme activities responded differently, and in a species-dependent manner, to the HS treatment and subsequent recovery. SOD activity was mostly reduced or unaffected during HS but underwent an increase in activity during the recovery period in all grain amaranths (Figure 5C). GR, in contrast, reached highest levels of activity at the end of the HS treatment and subsequently receded during recovery, except in A. cruentus, where the increase in GR activity during HS did not follow a uniform pattern and where no decrease in GR activity was detected during recovery (Figure 5D). CAT activity was predominantly unresponsive to HS and also remained unchanged during recovery, except in A. caudatus, where significant peaks in activity were observed 30 h after HS and during the following recovery period (Figure 5E). No H2O2 was detected in any of the grain amaranth leaf samples analyzed.

Morphological and physiological alterations produced in chronically heat-stressed grain amaranth plants

Although the survival to prolonged and severe heat stress in the three grain amaranth species tested was elevated (i.e., between 85 and 100%), the plants nevertheless showed severe responses to this condition that were manifested during both vegetative and reproductive development stages (Table 2; Figure 6). Heat-stressed plants were, in average, 1.5 to 2-fold shorter than control plants kept under optimal conditions (Table 2; Figures 6A–I). Plant height hindrance started early, being already evident 10 days after the exposure to stress (Table 2). Some heat-stressed A. hypochondriacus and A. caudatus plants ramified into two or three-stemmed plants (Figures 6A–I); the additional stems were always generated from early, and usually irreversible, heat stress-derived damage to the apical meristem of the main stem.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Effect of extended, severe heat stress on vegetative and reproductive development parameters in grain amaranth species.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Effects of prolonged, severe heat stress on vegetative and reproductive development in grain amaranth plants. Severe long-term heat stress stunted plant growth, leading to plants that were, in average 1.5 to 2-fold shorter than control plants kept under optimal conditions (A–I). Some heat-stressed plants ramified into two-stemmed plants, as shown in A. hypochondriacus (A) and A. caudatus (I); Heat stress conditions caused leaf damage in A. caudatus (J, N, O), or led to a morphological alteration characterized by the division of the leaf into two parts along the middle of the leaf surface (K, L). Panicle emergence was greatly delayed or suppressed (i.e., in A. cruentus) (M), and subsequent development was very slow (i.e., in A. cruentus) (R) or produced deformed panicles (i.e., in A. hypochondriacus) (P). Flowering in the panicles produced by A. cruentus and A. caudatus was also delayed (R, U), whereas flowering panicles (i.e., in A. hypochondriacus (Q) and A. cruentus) produced very low numbers of immature/mature seeds, or no seeds at all (A. caudatus). Heat stress also led to profuse branching, a modification that occurred concomitantly with panicle emergence in most plants of the three grain amaranth 3 species (Q–U).

In contrast, all heat-stressed plants produced a greater number of leaves, a parameter that was determined 57 days after the beginning of the heat stress treatment (Table 2). However, the leaves showed evident signs of damage, particularly in A. caudatus (Figures 6J, N, O), whereas some A. cruentus´ leaves developed a morphological alteration characterized by the division of the leaf into two sections, which emerged from a profound partition, resembling a mechanical rupture, that emerged along the middle of the leaf surface (Figures 6K, L). The reproductive performance of heat-stressed grain amaranths was also profoundly perturbed. Thus, panicle emergence was greatly delayed, or sometimes completely suppressed (i.e., in A. cruentus, Figure 6M), and, later, the emerging panicles had, in average, an extremely slow growth rate (i.e., in A. cruentus; Figure 6R) and some were deformed (i.e., in A. hypochondriacus; Figure 6P). Moreover, flowering in the panicles produced by A. cruentus and A. caudatus was delayed (Figures 6R–U), whereas flowering panicles in A. hypochondriacus were slow to produce mature seeds, as determined 60 days after heat stress (Figure 6Q; Table 2). At this stage, all control plants had produced mature seeds. Another striking effect associated with the reproductive performance of grain amaranths was the profuse branching that occurred concomitantly with panicle emergence in most plants of all 3 species (Figures 6Q, S, U). Seed yields in A. hypochondriacus and A. cruentus were 3.5 to 7-fold lower, respectively, than those produced by equivalent control plants, whereas no seeds were produced by heat-stressed A. caudatus plants (Table 2).

Discussion

Grain amaranths have been demonstrated to be climate-resilient crops capable of adapting to harsh ambient conditions that are usually unfavorable to several commercial crops, including most cereals, on which the world´s food security depends. Various previous studies using grain amaranths as model plants have demonstrated that abiotic stress tolerance is highly species specific. This trait appears to occur as a consequence of the differential manifestation of various biochemical, molecular and physiological responses designed to reduce, for example, the negative impact of severe defoliation (2015; Vargas-Ortiz et al., 2013; Cisneros-Hernández et al., 2021), WDS (González-Rodríguez et al., 2019) and long-term flooding and hypoxia/anoxia (J.P. Padilla-Escamilla, personal communication), among other damaging ambient conditions. This study extended this perspective by concentrating on the effects and species-specific responses of grain amaranths to HS and heat stress conditions. A number of previous reports have recognized the capacity of amaranth plants, mostly vegetable and weed types, to withstand high-temperature stress, usually together with water-deficit conditions. For instance, studies performed with various Amaranthus species, revealed a differential capacity to repair damaged tissues after heat stress exposure and to subsequently reactivate normal metabolic functions, such as photosynthesis. Thus, part of the greater growth of A. palmeri at higher temperatures, compared to A. retroflexus and A. rudis was attributed to its extensive root growth and to the greater thermostability of its photosynthetic apparatus (Gou and Al-Khatib, 2003). Further species-specific differences in heat tolerance were recently associated with a higher tolerance of the photosynthetic apparatus of A. cruentus and A. spinosus to combined heat and drought stress, compared to A. caudatus and A. hypochondriacus. The difference observed was linked to a higher PSII photochemical efficiency and to an increased pool size of the final electron acceptors of PSI. Additional contributing factors were the accumulation of higher Pro levels and a higher membrane stability, which was correlated to a significantly reduced propensity to electrolyte leakage (Netshimbupfe et al., 2022). Another investigation found that seeds of A. tricolor and A. spinosus were able to germinate in conditions of extreme ground temperatures and low soil water potentials. This ability was interpreted as an adaptative trait to the high-temperature conditions of their natural tropical habitats, similar to several other intrusive plant species that take advantage of this capacity to enhance their invasive capacity (Ye and Wen, 2017). In this respect, a recent study suggested a link between the extent of the globulin seed protein fraction and the suitability of seeds of diverse grain amaranth species for use in arid regions of Mexico and other world regions (Barba de la Rosa et al., 2009). This proposal was based on the high homology of the globulin seed protein fraction with the Cupin domain of seed storage proteins of other plant species, considering that the latter has been associated with resistance to extreme heat and WDS (Khuri et al., 2001).

In the present study, a significantly higher tolerance to HS was observed in A. hypochondriacus. This characteristic was in accordance with the superior tolerance of this grain amaranth species to WDS compared to A. cruentus and A. caudatus (González-Rodríguez et al., 2019). Several biochemical responses, mostly detected in roots, were associated with the latter trait, including a stronger expression of abscisic acid marker genes, a more robust sugar starvation response and an enhanced osmotic adjustment. The latter was proposed to result from higher basal and WDS-induced hexose levels and hexose/sucrose ratios that coincided with a depletion of starch reserves in leaves and roots and augmented levels of raffinose family oligosaccharides and Pro. Although most of the biochemical and enzymatic parameters analyzed in this study were found to change drastically during HS and subsequent recovery, it was nevertheless found that, similar to WDS, greater HS tolerance in A. hypochondriacus compared to the other two grain amaranth species coincided with a number of specific parameters such as: i) a very pronounced depletion of leaf starch reserves during the HS treatment, and ii) a significantly higher accumulation of foliar Pro, Suc, total phenols and flavonoids and betalains and other pigments at the latter stages of the HS treatment. This pattern coincided with the greater accumulation of redox-sensitive phenols and flavonoids recently reported in WDS-tolerant accessions of A. hypochondriacus (Aditya et al., 2022). Likewise, a comparison of thermosensitive and thermotolerant lettuce cultivars revealed that the latter differentially accumulated specific phenylpropanoid and flavonoid compounds known to have strong antioxidant activity, upon heat treatment (Oh et al., 2009; Wei et al., 2021). Augmented Pro levels were also congruent with this compound’s role in the mitigation of high temperature stress and subsequent recovery due to its quenching of singlet oxygen and superoxide radicals (Kavi Kishor et al., 2022).

Modified levels of soluble sugars are similarly known to be altered during heat stress in order to regulate osmotic pressure within the cell (Wang et al., 2020). Moreover, soluble carbohydrate accumulation, mostly as Suc, is related to heat stress-activated starch degradation (Thalmann et al., 2016) coupled to enhanced sucrose phosphate synthase activity (Der Agopian et al., 2011). Starch breakdown has also been linked to the activation of β-amylase gene expression (see below) and activity, which is known to be induced by several stress conditions, including heat (Dreier et al., 1995). β-amylase activity also leads to the accumulation of maltose, which acts as a precursor of soluble sugar metabolism and as a protective agent of proteins, membranes and the photosynthetic electron transport chain under either heat or freezing stress (Kaplan and Guy, 2004; Kaplan et al., 2006). In general, the fluctuation of NSCs levels in leaves of heat-shocked grain amaranths was in agreement with the significant effect that high-temperature stress is known to have on photosynthesis, starch synthesis, Suc synthesis and transport, and photo-assimilate accumulation (Lal et al., 2022).

Regarding pigment levels, prior studies have revealed that wheat cultivars resistant to heat stress maintained higher total chlorophyll levels in addition to other favorable responses such as higher Fv/Fm ratios and increased photosynthetic and transpiration rates and stomatal conductance (Sharma et al., 2015). These findings were in accordance with previously reported data linking delayed senescence and heat tolerance in wheat (Reynolds et al., 1997; Vijayalakshmi et al., 2010). Further, transgenic sweet-potato plants overexpressing a modified Orange gene encoding a plastid-localized DnaJ protein known to regulate carotenoid synthesis and abiotic stress resistance, accumulated significantly higher total carotenoid and β-carotene contents in storage roots and leaves. Transgenic plants also showed greater tolerance to heat stress compared to untransformed WT plants. This finding agreed with the role of carotenoids in protecting the photosynthetic apparatus from photo-oxidative stress (Stanley and Yuan, 2019; Kim et al., 2021). Finally, stress-induced accumulation of betalain pigments, usually found in red-leafed betalain-accumulating plants adapted to harsh ambient conditions, was congruent with their protective effect against oxidative damage, a property linked to their to their superior ability to scavenge oxygen free radicals and to regulate cell osmotic pressure, similarly to Pro (Sdouga et al., 2019).

This study also expanded the information regarding the stress-responsive nature of various grain amaranth unknown function genes reported in prior studies (Délano-Frier et al., 2011; Cabrales-Orona and Délano-Frier, 2021). Thus, WDS was found to induce the expression of AhHAB4-PAI-1, AhBAMY and AhTIL, which reached their highest levels at an intermediate stage of the WDS treatment applied, whereas these genes, except AhBAMY, were mostly unsensitive to high salt stress. Conversely, AhOEE was strongly repressed by WDS and was also quite insensitive to salt stress. These results coincided with the perceived role of these genes in the regulation of drought tolerance in other plant models (Todaka et al., 2000; Levesque-Tremblay et al., 2009; Abo-Ogiala et al., 2014; Ambrosone et al., 2015; Zanella et al., 2016) and with the high stress sensitivity and concomitant inhibition of the oxygen-evolving complex (Hajheidari et al., 2005; Zadražnik et al., 2019).

The expression pattern of the genes analyzed in this work was also greatly affected during the HS treatment and the subsequent recovery period. The expression of several of them was congruent with strong experimental evidence describing their role in the protection of plants against abiotic stress, including heat-related damage, such as AhERD, commonly used as a marker for stress responses in other plant models (Cheng et al., 2013; Doner et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2021) and AhTIL (Levesque-Tremblay et al., 2009; Boca et al., 2014; Wahyudi et al., 2020). The heat responsiveness of the Ah2880 gene was unexpected. However, this gene codes for a small protein that, similarly to lipocalins, could function by binding to other proteins and/or hydrophobic molecules during stress-amelioration cellular processes (Sanchez et al., 2006). This possibility remains to be tested experimentally, although its overexpression in transgenic A. thaliana plants led to significantly increased recovery to HS conditions, similar to the overexpression of AhHAB4-PAI-1 coding for RNA-binding protein (Cabrales-Orona et al., in preparation; see below). Other genes examined showed a species-specific expression pattern that could offer clues as to the mechanisms leading to the higher HS tolerance observed in A. hypochondriacus plants. Therefore, the expression AhHAB4-PAI-1 in leaves of heat-shocked A. hypochondriacus leaves was stronger and more persistent compared to A. cruentus and A. caudatus. Furthermore, the prominent expression peak of this gene, detected during the first stages of recovery in the three grain amaranths tested, was ca. 2-fold higher in A. hypochondriacus. The high AhHAB4-PAI-1 expression detected in response to HS was congruent with recent data showing that the D2 and D4 RNA-binding and glycine-rich proteins from A. thaliana, coded by the RBGD2 and RBGD4 genes that share similarity with AhHAB4-PAI-1, are essential for heat tolerance in this plant model via their role in the organization of specific proteins and transcripts into stress granules. These are membrane-less condensates that assemble as a result of protein liquid-liquid phase separation in response to stress and are composed of un-translated mRNAs, translation initiation factors, proteins with intrinsically disordered regions and RNA-binding domains, in addition to several other components. Stress granules have been demonstrated to be crucial for adaptative cellular responses to stress and for post-stress recovery, when the release to the cytoplasm of mRNA and proteins from disassembling stress granules reactivates translation to restore cell growth and development (Maruri-López et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2022). This proposal is supported by the highly increased recovery after heat-shock observed in transgenic A. thaliana plants overexpressing AhHAB4-PAI-1 (Cabrales-Orona et al., in preparation). Other differences in the expression pattern of grain amaranth unknown function genes that coincided with the increased HS-tolerance detected in A. hypochondriacus were the slightly higher expression levels of the AhRIP and AhDGR genes during the first 3 h of the HS treatment, the more persistent induction of the AhOEE during the HS period and the induction of AhBAMY observed 1 day after recovery, but not during the HS treatment. These results are supported by data suggesting that RNA editing rates may affect heat stress responses in plants, such as A. thaliana and grape (Chu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). RNA editing proteins have also been recognized as part of the stress granules assembled in the cytoplasm and in the chloroplasts in response to HS conditions (Chodasiewicz et al., 2020). The proposed contribution of the AhDGR gene to increased HS tolerance in grain amaranths coincides with experimental evidence showing that cell wall remodeling through the regulation of its methylesterification levels influences plant responses to heat stress, e.g., by regulating the flexibility of the guard cell walls that is needed for their appropriate response to high temperature conditions (Wu et al., 2017, 2018; 2022;). Induced expression of AhOEE in leaves of A. hypochondriacus, after HS exposures that repressed this gene in the other two grain amaranth species, may have reflected an increased ability of its photosynthetic machinery to withstand anomalously high temperatures, considering that PSII, including the oxygen evolving complex, is considered to be one of the primary targets of high temperature stress, together with ATP generation and carbon fixation (Allakhverdiev et al., 2008; Barta et al., 2010). Thus, increased tolerance to HS in grain amaranths could be related to a higher photosynthetic activity under heat stress conditions, similarly to what was recently reported in maize and transgenic glycine-betaine-accumulating transgenic tomato plants (Doğru, 2021; Li et al., 2021b). Apart from the functional properties mentioned above, differential AhBAMY expression patterns could have favored the superior recovery of heat-shocked A. hypochondriacus plants by increasing the photochemical efficiency of the PSII in the chloroplast, similar to certain plastidic BAMY genes that have been found to enhance freezing stress in A. thaliana plants via this mechanism (Monroe et al., 2014).

Finally, the prolonged exposure to intense heat stress conditions had a negative effect on the vegetative and reproductive development of grain amaranth plants (Hedhly et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2020). The impact observed was, once again, species dependent. Thus, A. caudatus showed a stronger susceptibility to heat stress, a trait possibly associated with its origin in the higher-altitude regions of Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador, and/or to the fact that, in contrast to A. hypochondriacus and A. cruentus, it appears to have weaker domestication traits (Stetter et al., 2017). The strong influence that heat stress had on the reproductive phase of grain amaranths was in accordance to observations made in most other crop plants, in which a drastic reduction of seed yield was produced once their range of tolerable temperatures was exceeded (Porter, 2005). This is a sobering finding that should be taken into account when considering the use of grain amaranths as crops fit to sustain the increasingly warm conditions caused by the ongoing global climate change.

Conclusions

The present study presents further experimental evidence supporting the resistance to heat-stress related damage usually attributed to grain amaranths. Several biochemical and molecular factors were found to be possible contributors to heat stress tolerance in these plants. Nevertheless, the species-specific rates of recovery observed after aggressive HS conditions that are lethal to several other model plants were in accordance with previously reported differences in grain amaranth tolerance to WDS and defoliation, among others. They further support the notion that grain amaranths have gradually acquired differential strategies to cope with (a)biotic stress despite their common ancestry, as suggested, for instance, by the association found between the differential expression levels of genes coding for RNA binding and RNA editing proteins, believed to play a crucial role in the plant’s responses to heat stress and to augment HS tolerance. Conversely, grain amaranths were strongly affected by chronic and severe heat stress conditions that are predicted to prevail in certain regions of the planet if the increase in global temperatures is not controlled. This is a cause for concern, considering that grain and vegetable amaranths have been lately proposed as heat-resilient candidate crops that may be able to thrive in the adverse climatic scenarios predicted for the near future.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JD-F, PP-S, GC-O, AR-R, JP-E, and LS-S. Performed the experiments: GC-O, AR-R, JP-E, LS-S, and NM-G. Analyzed the data: JD-F, PP-S, NM-G, GC-O, AR-R, JP-E, and LS-S. Wrote the paper: JD-F and PP-S. Revised the manuscript: JD-F and PP-S. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NM-G and LS-S. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1101375/full#supplementary-material

References

Abo-Ogiala, A., Carsjens, C., Diekmann, H., Fayyaz, P., Herrfurth, C., Feussner, I., et al. (2014). Temperature-induced lipocalin (TIL) is translocated under salt stress and protects chloroplasts from ion toxicity. J. Plant Physiol. 171, 250–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Achigan-Dako, E. G., Sogbohossou, O. E. D., Maundu, P. (2014). Current knowledge on Amaranthus spp.: research avenues for improved nutritional value and yield in leafy amaranths in sub-Saharan Africa. Euphytica 197, 303–317. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1081-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Adhikary, D., Pratt, D. B. (2015). Morphologic and taxonomic analysis of the weedy and cultivated Amaranthus hybridus species complex. Syst. Bot. 40, 604–610. doi: 10.1600/036364415X688376

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aditya, M., Sen, D., Bhattacharjee, S. (2022). Drought tolerance promoted by complementation of ascorbate-glutathione system and antioxidant-rich phytochemicals in Amaranthus hypochondriacus l. JSFA Rep. 2, 556–574. doi: 10.1002/jsf2.89

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aguilar-Hernández, H. S., Santos, L., León-Galván, F., Barrera-Pacheco, A., Espitia-Rangel, E., De León-Rodríguez, A., et al. (2011). Identification of calcium stress induced genes in amaranth leaves through suppression subtractive hybridization. J. Plant Physiol. 168, 2102–2109. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Allakhverdiev, S. I., Kreslavski, V. D., Klimov, V. V., Los, D. A., Carpentier, R., Mohanty, P. (2008). Heat stress: an overview of molecular responses in photosynthesis. Photosynth. Res. 98, 541–550. doi: 10.1007/s11120-008-9331-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ambrosone, A., Batelli, G., Nurcato, R., Aurilia, V., Punzo, P., Bangarusamy, D. K., et al. (2015). The arabidopsis RNA-binding protein AtRGGA regulates tolerance to salt and drought stress. Plant Physiol. 168, 292–306. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.255802

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barba de la Rosa, A. P., Fomsgaard, I. S., Laursen, B., Mortensen, A. G., Olvera-Martínez, L., Silva-Sánchez, C., et al. (2009). Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) as an alternative crop for sustainable food production: Phenolic acids and flavonoids with potential impact on its nutraceutical quality. J. Cereal Sci. 49, 117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.07.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barta, C., Dunkle, A. M., Wachter, R. M., Salvucci, M. E. (2010). Structural changes associated with the acute thermal instability of rubisco activase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 499, 17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.04.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boca, S., Koestler, F., Ksas, B., Chevalier, A., Leymarie, J., Fekete, A., et al. (2014). Arabidopsis lipocalins AtCHL and AtTIL have distinct but overlapping functions essential for lipid protection and seed longevity. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 368–381. doi: 10.1111/pce.12159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brenner, D., Baltensperger, D., Kulakow, P., Lehmann, J., Myers, R., Slabbert, M., et al. (2000). Genetic resources and breeding of Amaranthus. Plant Breed. Rev. 19, 227–285. doi: 10.1002/9780470650172.ch7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cabrales-Orona, G. (2016). Estudio de la sobreexpresión del gen ahβ-amilasa de amaranto en plantas transgénicas de arabidopsis thaliana y su efecto sobre la resistencia a temperaturas extremas (Mexico: Instituto Tecnológico de Durango).

Google Scholar

Cabrales-Orona, G. (2017). Análisis de genes de función desconocida de amaranto de grano que se expresan en múltiples condiciones de estrés (Mexico: Cinvestav, Unidad Irapuato).

Google Scholar

Cabrales-Orona, G., Délano-Frier, J. P. (2021). “Searching for an identity: Functional characterization of taxonomically restricted genes in grain amaranth,” in The amaranth genome. Eds. Adhikary, D., Deyholos, M. K., Délano-Frier, J. P. (Switzerland: Springer Nature). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-72365-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cabrales-Orona, G., Martínez-Gallardo, N., Délano-Frier, J. P. (2022). Functional characterization of an amaranth Natterin-4-Like-1 gene in. Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.814188

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Casarrubias-Castillo, K., Martínez-Gallardo, N. A., Délano-Frier, J. P. (2014). Treatment of Amaranthus cruentus with chemical and biological inducers of resistance has contrasting effects on fitness and protection against compatible gram positive and gram negative bacterial pathogens. J. Plant Physiol. 171, 927–939. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.02.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caselato-Sousa, V. M., Amaya-Farfán, J. (2012). State of knowledge on amaranth grain: a comprehensive review. J. Food Sci. 77, R93–R104. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02645.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castrillón-Arbeláez, P. A., Martinez-Gallardo, N., Arnaut, H. A., Tiessen, A., Delano-Frier, J. P. (2012). Metabolic and enzymatic changes associated with carbon mobilization, utilization and replenishment triggered in grain amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus) in response to partial defoliation by mechanical injury or insect herbivory. BMC Plant Biol. 12, 163. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cevik, S., Akpinar, G., Yildizli, A., Kasap, M., Karaosmanoglu, K., Unyayar, S. (2019). Comparative physiological and leaf proteome analysis between drought-tolerant chickpea Cicer reticulatum and drought-sensitive chickpea C. arietinum. J. Biosci. 44, 20. doi: 10.1007/s12038-018-9836-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, M., Liao, P., Kuo, W., Lin, T. (2013). The arabidopsis ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 regulates abiotic stress-responsive gene expression by binding to different cis-acting elements in response to different stress signals. Plant Physiol. 162, 1566–1582. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.221911

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chi, W. T., Fung, R. W., Liu, H. C., Hsu, C. C., Charng, Y. Y. (2009). Temperature-induced lipocalin is required for basal and acquired thermotolerance in arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 917–927. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01972.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chodasiewicz, M., Sokolowska, E. M., Nelson-Dittrich, A. C., Masiuk, A., Beltran, J. C. M., Nelson, A. D. L., et al. (2020). Identification and characterization of the heat-induced plastidial stress granules reveal new insight into arabidopsis stress response. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.595792

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chu, D., Wei, L.. (2020). Reduced C-to-U RNA editing rates might play a regulatory role in stress response of Arabidopsis . J. Plant Physiol. 244, 153081. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2019.153081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cisneros-Hernández, I., Vargas-Ortiz, E., Sánchez-Martínez, E. S., Martínez-Gallardo, N., Soto González, D., Délano-Frier, J. P. (2021). Highest defoliation tolerance in Amaranthus cruentus plants at panicle development is associated with sugar starvation responses. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.658977

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Das, S. (2016). “Distribution and maintenance of amaranth germplasm worldwide,” in Amaranthus: A promising crop of future. Ed. Das, S. (Berlin: Springer), 99–106. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1469-7_7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Délano-Frier, J. P., Avilés-Arnaut, H., Casarrubias-Castillo, K., Casique-Arroyo, G., Castrillón-Arbeláez, P. A., Herrera-Estrella, L., et al. (2011). Transcriptomic analysis of grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) using 454 pyrosequencing: comparison with A. tuberculatus, expression profiling in stems and in response to biotic and abiotic stress. BMC Genomics 12, 363. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Délano-Frier, J. P., Martínez-Gallardo, N. A., Martínez-de la Vega, O., Salas-Araiza, M., Barbosa-Jaramillo, E. R., Torres, A., et al. (2004). The effect of exogenous jasmonic acid on induced resistance and productivity in amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) is influenced by environmental conditions. J. Chem. Ecol. 30, 1001–1034. doi: 10.1023/B:JOEC.0000028464.36353.bb

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Der Agopian, R. G., Peroni-Okita, F. H. G., Soares, C. A., Mainardi, J. A., do Nascimento, J. O., Cordenunsi, B. R., et al. (2011). Low temperature induced changes in activity and protein levels of the enzymes associated to conversion of starch to sucrose in banana fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 62, 133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.05.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Ron, A. M., Sparvoli, F., Pueyo, J. J., Bazile, D. (2017). Protein crops: Food and feed for the future. Front. Plant Sci. 8. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doğru, A. (2021). Effects of heat stress on photosystem II activity and antioxidant enzymes in two maize cultivars. Planta 253, 85. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03611-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doner, N. M., Seay, D., Mehling, M., Sun, S., Gidda, S. K., Schmitt, K., et al. (2021). Arabidopsis thaliana EARLY RESPONSIVE TO DEHYDRATION 7 localizes to lipid droplets via its senescence domain. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.658961

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dreier, W., Schnarrenberger, C., Börne, T. (1995). Light- and stress-dependent enhancement of amylolytic activities in white and green barley leaves: β-amylases are stress-induced proteins. J. Plant Physiol. 145 342–348. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81900-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dusenge, M. E., Duarte, A. G., Way, D. A. (2019). Plant carbon metabolism and climate change: Elevated CO2 and temperature impacts on photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration. New Phytol. 221, 32–49. doi: 10.1111/nph.15283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Geange, S. R., Arnold, P. A., Catling, A. A., Coast, O., Cook, A. M., Gowland, K. M., et al. (2021). The thermal tolerance of photosynthetic tissues: A global systematic review and agenda for future research. New Phytol. 229, 2497–2513. doi: 10.1111/nph.17052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

González-Rodríguez, T., Cisneros-Hernández, I., Acosta Bayona, J., Ramírez-Chavez, E., Martínez-Gallardo, N., Mellado-Mojica, E., et al. (2019). Identification of factors linked to higher water-deficit stress tolerance in Amaranthus hypochondriacus compared to other grain amaranths and A. hybridus, their shared ancestor. Plants 8, 239. doi: 10.3390/plants8070239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gou, P., Al-Khatib, K. A. (2003). Temperature effects on germination and growth of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis). Weed Sci. 51, 869–879. doi: 10.1614/P2002-127

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hajheidari, M., Abdollahian-Noghabi, M., Askari, H., Heidari, M., Sadeghian, S. Y., Ober, E. S., et al. (2005). Proteome analysis of sugar beet leaves under drought stress. Proteomics 5, 950–960. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200401101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hedhly, A., Hormaza, J. I., Herrero, M.. (2005). Plant response to water deficit and shade stresses in pigweed and their influences on feeding and oviposition by waterhemp . Environ. Entomol. 34, 929–937. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X-34.4.929

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hedhly, A., Hormaza, J. I., Herrero, M. (2009). Global warming and sexual plant reproduction. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heide, H., Kalisz, H. M., Follmann, H. (2004). The oxygen evolving enhancer protein 1 (OEE) of photosystem II in green algae exhibits thioredoxin activity. J. Plant Physiol. 161, 139–149. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-01033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hernández-Ledesma, P., Berendsohn, W. G., Borsch, T., Von Mering, S., Akhani, H., Arias, S., et al. (2015). A taxonomic backbone for the global synthesis of species diversity in the angiosperm order caryophyllales. Wildenowia 45, 281–383. doi: 10.3372/wi.45.45301

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob, D., Taylor, M., Bindi, M., Brown, S., Camilloni, I., et al. (2018). “Impacts of 1.5°C global warming on natural and human systems,” in Global warming of 1.5°C. an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change; special report (Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 175–311.

Google Scholar

Hoidal, N., Díaz Gallardo, M., Jacobsen, S.-E., Alandia, G. (2019). Amaranth as a dual-use crop for leafy greens and seeds: Stable responses to leaf harvest across genotypes and environments. Front. Plant Sci. 10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00817

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, J., Zhao, X., Bürger, M., Wang, Y., Chory, J. (2021). Two interacting ethylene response factors regulate heat stress response. Plant Cell 33, 338–357. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaa026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huerta-Ocampo, J. A., Barrera-Pacheco, A., Mendoza-Hernández, C. S., Espitia-Rangel, E., Mock, H. P., Barba de la Rosa, A. P. (2014). Salt stress-induced alterations in the root proteome of Amaranthus cruentus l. J. Proteome Res. 13, 3607–3627. doi: 10.1021/pr500153m

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huerta-Ocampo, J. A., Leon-Galvan, M. F., Ortega-Cruz, L. B., Barrera-Pacheco, A., De Leon-Rodriguez, A., Mendoza-Hernández, G., et al. (2011). Water stress induces up-regulation of DOF1 and MIF1 transcription factors and down-regulation of proteins involved in secondary metabolism in amaranth roots (Amaranthus hypochondriacus l.). Plant Biol. 13, 472–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00391.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jamalluddin, N., Massawe, F. J., Symonds, R. C. (2019). Transpiration efficiency of amaranth (Amaranthus sp.) in response to drought stress. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 94, 448–459. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2018.1537725

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, D., Chen, J., Zhang, Z., Hou, X. (2021). Mitochondrial transcription termination factor 27 is required for salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1466. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031466

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, B. L., Henderson, T. L. (2002). Water use patterns of grain amaranth in the northern great plains. Agron. J. 94, 1437–1443. doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.1437

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joshi, D. C., Sood, S., Hosahatti, R., Kant, L., Pattanayak, A., Kumar, A., et al. (2018). From zero to hero: the past, present and future of grain amaranth breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 131, 1807–1823. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3138-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kadereit, G., Borsch, T., Weising, K., Freitag, H. (2003). Phylogeny of amaranthaceae and chenopodiaceae and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164, 959–986. doi: 10.1086/378649

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaplan, F., Guy, C. L. (2004). β-amylase induction and the protective role of maltose during temperature shock. Plant Physiol. 135, 1674–1684. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.040808

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaplan, F., Sung, D. Y., Guy, C. L. (2006). Roles of ß-amylase and starch breakdown during temperature stress. Physiol. Plant 126, 120–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00604.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kavi Kishor, P. B., Suravajhala, P., Rathnagiri, P., Sreenivasulu, N. (2022). Intriguing role of proline in redox potential conferring high temperature stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.867531

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khuri, S., Bakker, F. T., Dunwell, J. M. (2001). Phylogeny, function and evolution of the cupins, a structurally conserved, functionally diverse superfamily of proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 593–605. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003840

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kietlinski, K. D., Jimenez, F., Jellen, E. N., Maughan, P. J., Smith, S. M., Pratt, D. B. (2014). Relationships between the weedy Amaranthus hybridus (Amaranthaceae) and the grain amaranths. Crop Sci. 54, 220. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0173

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, E. Y., Choi, Y. H., Lee, J. I., Kim, I. H., Nam, T. J. (2015). Antioxidant activity of oxygen evolving enhancer protein 1 purified from Capsosiphon fulvescens. J. Food Sci. 80, 1412–1417. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12883

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, S. E., Lee, C. J., Park, S. U., Lim, Y. H., Park, W. S., Kim, H. J., et al. (2021). Overexpression of the golden SNP-carrying Orange gene enhances carotenoid accumulation and heat stress tolerance in sweet-potato plants. Antioxidants 10, 51. doi: 10.3390/antiox10010051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lal, A., Edwards, E. (1996). Analysis of inhibition of photosynthesis under water stress in the C4 species Amaranthus cruentus and Zea mays: Electron transport, CO2 fixation and carboxylation capacity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 23, 403–412. doi: 10.1071/PP9960403

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lal, M. K., Sharma, N., Adavi, S. B., Sharma, E., Altaf, M. A., Tiwari, R. K., et al. (2022). From source to sink: mechanistic insight of photoassimilates synthesis and partitioning under high temperature and elevated [CO2]. Plant Mol. Biol. 110, 305–324. doi: 10.1007/s11103-022-01274-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levesque-Tremblay, G., Havaux, M., Ouellet, F. (2009). The chloroplastic lipocalin AtCHL prevents lipid peroxidation and protects Arabidopsis against oxidative stress. Plant J. 60, 691–702. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03991.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, B., Gao, K., Ren, H., Tang, W. (2019). Molecular mechanisms governing plant responses to high temperatures. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 60, 757–779. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12701

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Li, X., Zhang, J., Li, D., Yan, L., You, M., et al. (2021a). Physiological and proteomic responses of contrasting alfalfa (Medicago sativa l.) varieties to high temperature stress. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.753011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, F., Stützel, H. (2004). Biomass partitioning, specific leaf area, and water use efficiency of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in response to drought stress. Hortic. Sci. 102, 15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2003.11.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Livak, K. J., Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCt method. Methods 25, 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, D., Wang, M., Zhang, T., Chen, X., Li, C., Liu, Y., et al. (2021b). Glycinebetaine mitigated the photoinhibition of photosystem II at high temperature in transgenic tomato plants. Photosynth. Res. 147, 301–315. doi: 10.1007/s11120-020-00810-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maruri-López, I., Figueroa, N. E., Hernández-Sánchez, I. E., Chodasiewicz, M. (2021). Plant stress granules: Trends and beyond. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.722643

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Massange-Sánchez, J. A., Palmeros-Suárez, P. A., Espitia-Rangel, E., Rodríguez-Arévalo, I., Sánchez-Segura, L., Martínez-Gallardo, N. A., et al. (2016). Overexpression of grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) AhERF or AhDOF transcription factors in Arabidopsis thaliana increases water deficit- and salt-stress tolerance, respectively, via contrasting stress-amelioration mechanisms. PloS One 11, e0164280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Massange-Sánchez, J. A., Palmeros-Suárez, P. A., Martínez-Gallardo, N. A., Castrillón-Arbelaez, P. A., Avilés-Arnaut, H., Alatorre-Cobos, F., et al. (2015). The novel and taxonomically restricted Ah24 gene from grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) has a dual role in development and defense. Front. Plant Sci. 6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00602

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miller, T. E., Wing, J. S., Huete, A. R. (1984). The agricultural potential of selected C4 plants in arid environments. J. Arid Environ. 7, 275–286. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1963(18)31366-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mittler, R., Finka, A., Goloubinoff, P. (2012). How do plants feel the heat? Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.11.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Monroe, J. D., Storm, A. R., Badley, E. M., Lehman, M. D., Platt, S. M., Saunders, L. K., et al. (2014). β-Amylase1 and β-amylase3 are plastidic starch hydrolases in arabidopsis that seem to be adapted for different thermal, pH, and stress conditions. Plant Physiol. 166, 1748–1763. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.24642

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Montoya-Rodríguez, A., Gómez-Favela, M. A., Reyes-Moreno, C., Milán-Carrillo, J., González de Mejía, E. (2015). Identification of bioactive peptide sequences from amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) seed proteins and their potential role in the prevention of chronic diseases. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 14, 139–158. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moran, P. J., Showeler, A. T. (2005). Plant response to water deficit and shade stresses in pigweed and their influences on feeding and oviposition by waterhemp. Environ. Entomol. 34, 929–937. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X-34.4.929

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mosyakin, S. L., Robertson, K. R. (1996). New infrageneric taxa and combinations in Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 33, 275–282.

Google Scholar

Netshimbupfe, M. H., Berner, J., Gouws, C. (2022). The interactive effects of drought and heat stress on photosynthetic efficiency and biochemical defense mechanisms of Amaranthus species. Plant-Environ. Interact. 3, 212–225. doi: 10.1002/pei3.10092

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oh, M. M., Carey, E. E., Rajashekar, C. B. (2009). Environmental stresses induce health-promoting phytochemicals in lettuce. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 47, 578–583. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.02.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Omami, E. N., Hammes, P. S. (2006). Interactive effects of salinity and water stress on growth, leaf water relations, and gas exchange in amaranth (Amaranthus spp.). N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 34, 33–44. doi: 10.1080/01140671.2006.9514385

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Omamt, E. N., Hammes, P. S., Robbertse, P. J. (2006). Differences in salinity tolerance for growth and water-use efficiency in some amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) genotypes. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 34, 11–22. doi: 10.1080/01140671.2006.9514382

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ortiz-Bobea, A., Wang, H., Carrillo, C. M., Ault, T. R. (2019). Unpacking the climatic drivers of US agricultural yields. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 064003. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1e75

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palmeros-Suárez, P. A., Massange-Sánchez, J. A., Martínez-Gallardo, N. A., Montero-Vargas, J. M., Gómez-Leyva, J. F., Délano-Frier, J. P. (2015). The overexpression of an Amaranthus hypochondriacus NF-YC gene modifies growth and confers water deficit stress resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 240, 25–40. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palmeros-Suárez, P. A., Massange-Sánchez, J. A., Sánchez-Segura, L., Martínez-Gallardo, N. A., Espitia Rangel, E., Gómez-Leyva, J. F., et al. (2017). AhDGR2, an amaranth abiotic stress-induced DUF642 protein gene, modifies cell wall structure and composition and causes salt and ABA hyper-sensibility in transgenic arabidopsis. Planta 245, 623–640. doi: 10.1007/s00425-016-2635-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Písaříková, B., Kráčmar, S., Herzig, I. (2005). Amino acid contents and biological value of protein in various amaranth species. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 50, 169–174. doi: 10.17221/4011-CJAS

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Porter, J. R. (2005). Rising temperatures are likely to reduce crop yields. Nature 436, 174. doi: 10.1038/436174b

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Portillo-Nava, C., Guerrero-Esperanza, M., Guerrero-Rangel, A., Guevara-Domínguez, P., Martínez-Gallardo, N., Nava-Sandoval, C., et al. (2021). Natural or light-induced pigment accumulation in grain amaranths coincides with enhanced resistance against insect herbivory. Planta 254, 101. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03757-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rastogi, A., Shukla, S. (2013). Amaranth: A new millennium crop of nutraceutical values. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 53, 109–125. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.517876

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reynolds, M. P., Nagarajan, S., Razzaque, M. A., Ageeb, O. A. A. (1997). Using canopy temperature depression to select for yield potential of wheat in heat stressed environments (Mexico, DF, Mexico: CIMMYT).

Google Scholar

Sakanaka, S., Tachibana, Y., Okada, Y. (2005). Preparation and antioxidant properties of extracts of Japanese persimmon leaf tea (kakinoha-cha). Food Chem. 89, 569–575. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.03.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanchez, D., Ganfornina, M., Gutierrez, G., Gauthier-Jauneau, A., Risler, J., Salier, J. (2006). “Lipocalins genes and their evolutionary history,” in Lipocalins. Eds. Akerström, B., Lögdberg, L. (Georgetown, TX: Landes Bioscience), 5–16. L.

Google Scholar

Sánchez-Hernández, C., Martínez-Gallardo, N., Guerrero-Rangel, A., Valdes-Rodríguez, S., Delano-Frier, J. (2004). Trypsin and alpha-amylase inhibitors are differentially induced in leaves of amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) in response to biotic and abiotic stress. Physiol. Plant 122, 254–264. doi: 10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.00398.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sarker, U., Oba, S. (2019). Nutraceuticals, antioxidant pigments, and phytochemicals in the leaves of Amaranthus spinosus and Amaranthus viridis weedy species. Sci. Rep. 9, 20413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50977-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sauer, J. D. (1950). The grain amaranths: A survey of their history and classification. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 37, 561–632. doi: 10.2307/2394403

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sdouga, D., Amor, F. B., Ghribi, S., Kabtni, S., Tebini, M., Branca, F., et al. (2019). An insight from tolerance to salinity stress in halophyte Portulaca oleracea l.: Physio-morphological, biochemical and molecular responses. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 172, 45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, D. K., Andersen, S. B., Ottosen, C. O., Rosenqvis, E. (2015). Wheat cultivars selected for high Fv/Fm under heat stress maintain high photosynthesis, total chlorophyll, stomatal conductance, transpiration and dry matter. Physiol. Plant 153, 284–298. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shukla, S., Bhargava, A., Chatterjee, A., Pandey, A. C., Mishra, B. K. (2010). Diversity in phenotypic and nutritional traits in vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus tricolor), a nutritionally under-utilised crop. J. Sci. Food Agric. 90, 139–144. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3797

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shukla, S., Pandey, V., Pachauri, G., Dixit, B. S., Banerji, R., Singh, S. P. (2003). Nutritional contents of different foliage cuttings of vegetable amaranth. Plant foods hum. Nutr 58, 1–8. doi: 10.1023/B:QUAL.0000040338.33755.b5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanley, L., Yuan, Y. W. (2019). Transcriptional regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants: So many regulators, so little consensus. Front. Plant Sci. 10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stetter, M. G., Müller, T., Schmid, K. J. (2017). Genomic and phenotypic evidence for an incomplete domestication of south American grain amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus). Mol. Ecol. 26, 871–886. doi: 10.1111/mec.13974

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stetter, M. G., Schmid, K. J. (2017). Analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genome size evolution of the Amaranthus genus using GBS indicates the ancestors of an ancient crop. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 109, 80–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stetter, M., Vidal-Villarejo, M., Schmid, K. J. (2020). Parallel seed color adaptation during multiple domestication attempts of an ancient new world grain. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1407–1419. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, A. Z., Chen, L. S., Tang, M., Chen, J. H., Li, H., Jin, X. Q., et al. (2022). Lipidomic remodeling in Begonia grandis under heat stress. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.843942

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Teng, X. L., Chen, N., Xiao, X. G. (2015). Identification of a catalase-phenol oxidase in betalain biosynthesis in red amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus). Front. Plant Sci. 6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01228

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thalmann, M., Pazmino, D., Seung, D., Horrer, D., Nigro, A., Meier, T., et al. (2016). Regulation of leaf starch degradation by abscisic acid is important for osmotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell 28, 1860–1878. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.0014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thornton, B., Basu, C. (2011). Real-time PCR (qPCR) primer design using free online software. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 39, 145–154. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20461

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Todaka, D., Matsushima, H., Morohashi, Y. (2000). Water stress enhances beta-amylase activity in cucumber cotyledons. J. Exp. Bot. 51, 739–745. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.345.739

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tranel, P. J., Trucco, F. (2009). “21st century weed science: A call for amaranthus genomics,” in Weedy and invasive plant genomics. Ed. Stewart, J. C. N. (IA, USA: Blackwell: Ames), 53–81.

Google Scholar

Trucco, F., Tranel, P. J. (2011). “Amaranthus,” in Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources. Ed. Kole, C. (Berlin: Springer), 11–21.

Google Scholar

Vargas-Ortiz, E., Délano-Frier, J. P., Tiessen, A. (2015). The tolerance of grain amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus l.) to defoliation during vegetative growth is compromised during flowering. J. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 91, 36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.03.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vargas-Ortiz, E., Espitia-Rangel, E., Tiessen, A., Délano-Frier, J. P. (2013). Grain amaranths are defoliation-tolerant crop species capable of utilizing stem and root carbohydrate reserves to sustain vegetative and reproductive growth after leaf loss. PloS One 8, e67879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067879

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Venskutonis, P. R., Kraujalis, P. (2013). Nutritional components of amaranth seeds and vegetables: A review on composition, properties, and uses. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 12, 381–412. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vijayalakshmi, K., Fritz, A. K., Paulsen, G. M., Bai, G. H., Pandravada, S., Gill, B. S. (2010). Modeling and mapping QTL for senescence-related traits in winter wheat under high temperature. Mol. Breed. 26, 163–175. doi: 10.1007/s11032-009-9366-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wahyudi, A., Fukazawa, C., Motohashi, R. (2020). Function of SlTILs and SlCHL under heat and oxidative stresses in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. 37, 335–341. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.20.0422

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Ma, K. B., Lu, Z. G., Ren, S. X., Jiang, H. R., Cui, J. W., et al. (2020). Differential physiological, transcriptomic and metabolomic responses of arabidopsis leaves under prolonged warming and heat shock. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 86. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2292-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, S., Zhang, L., Huo, G., Ge, G., Luo, L., Yang, Q., et al. (2021). Comparative transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses provide insights into thermal resistance in lettuce (Lactuca sativa l.). Sci. Hortic. 289, 110423. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110423

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, X., Blair, M. W. (2017). Diversity in grain amaranths and relatives distinguished by genotyping by sequencing (GBS). Front. Plant Sci. 8. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01960

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, H. C., Bulgakov, V. P., Jinn, T. L. (2018). Pectin methylesterases: Cell wall remodeling proteins are required for plant response to heat stress. Front. Plant Sci. 9. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01612

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, H. C., Huang, Y. C., Stracovsky, L., Jinn, T. L. (2017). Pectin methylesterase is required for guard cell function in response to heat. Plant Signal. Behav. 12, e1338227. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2017.1338227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, H. C., Yu, S. Y., Wang, Y. D., Jinn, T. L. (2022). Guard cell-specific pectin methylesterase53 is required for abscisic acid-mediated stomatal function and heat response in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.836151

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamamoto, Y. (2001). Quality control of photosystem II. Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 121–128. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pce022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, J., Wen, B. (2017). Seed germination in relation to the invasiveness in spiny amaranth and edible amaranth in xishuangbanna, SW China. PloS One 12, e0175948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175948

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zadražnik, T., Moen, A., Šuštar-Vozlič, J. (2019). Chloroplast proteins involved in drought stress response in selected cultivars of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.). 3 Biotech. 9, 331. doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1862-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zanella, M., Borghi, G. L., Pirone, C., Thalmann, M., Pazmino, D., Costa, A., et al. (2016). β-amylase 1 (BAM1) degrades transitory starch to sustain proline biosynthesis during drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 1819–1826. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv572

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, A., Jiang, X., Zhang, F., Wang, T., Zhang, X.. (2022). Dynamic response of RNA editing to temperature in grape by RNA deep sequencing . Funct. Integr. Genomics 20, 421–432. doi: 10.1007/s10142-019-00727-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Lu, Z., Wang, L., Jin, B. (2020). Plant responses to heat stress: Physiology, transcription, noncoding RNAs, and epigenetics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 117. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, S., Gu, J., Yao, J., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Xia, W., et al. (2022). Liquid-liquid phase separation of RBGD2/4 is required for heat stress resistance in arabidopsis. Dev. Cell. 14, 583–597.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: grain amaranth, heat stress, heat shock, unknown-function genes, reproductive fitness

Citation: Reyes-Rosales A, Cabrales-Orona G, Martínez-Gallardo NA, Sánchez-Segura L, Padilla-Escamilla JP, Palmeros-Suárez PA and Délano-Frier JP (2023) Identification of genetic and biochemical mechanisms associated with heat shock and heat stress adaptation in grain amaranths. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1101375. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1101375

Received: 17 November 2022; Accepted: 13 January 2023;
Published: 02 February 2023.

Edited by:

Chance Riggins, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States

Reviewed by:

Esaú Bojórquez-Velázquez, Instituto de Ecología (INECOL), Mexico
Iqbal Hussain, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Copyright © 2023 Reyes-Rosales, Cabrales-Orona, Martínez-Gallardo, Sánchez-Segura, Padilla-Escamilla, Palmeros-Suárez and Délano-Frier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: John P. Délano-Frier, john.delano@cinvestav.mx; Paola A. Palmeros-Suárez, paola.palmeros@academicos.udg.mx

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.