RETRACTED: Short-term responses of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) to the individual and combinatorial effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium and silicon in the soil contaminated by boron

Ma, Jing; Ali, Sajjad; Saleem, Muhammad Hamzah; Mumtaz, Sahar; Yasin, Ghulam; Ali, Baber; Al-Ghamdi, Abdullah Ahmed; Elshikh, Mohamed S.; Vodnar, Dan C.; Marc, Romina Alina; Rehman, Abdur; Khan, Muhammad Nauman; Chen, Fu; Ali, Shafaqat

doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.983156

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 23 September 2022

Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.983156

RETRACTED: Short-term responses of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) to the individual and combinatorial effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium and silicon in the soil contaminated by boron

Retracted

A retraction of this article was approved in:

Retraction: Short-term responses of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) to the individual and combinatorial effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium and silicon in the soil contaminated by boron
1. Read retraction

Jing Ma¹

Sajjad Ali²

Muhammad Hamzah Saleem^3*

Sahar Mumtaz⁴

Ghulam Yasin⁵

Baber Ali⁶

Abdullah Ahmed Al-Ghamdi⁷

Mohamed S. Elshikh⁷

Dan C. Vodnar^8*

Romina Alina Marc^9*

Abdur Rehman²

Muhammad Nauman Khan^10,11

Fu Chen¹

Shafaqat Ali^12,13*

¹School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
²Department of Botany, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan
³College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
⁴Department of Botany, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan
⁵Institute of Botany, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
⁶Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
⁷Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
⁸Institute of Life Sciences, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
⁹Food Engineering Department, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
¹⁰Biology Laboratory, Agriculture University Public School and College (AUPS&C) for Boys, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan
¹¹Department of Botany, Islamia College Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan
¹²Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
¹³Department of Biological Science and Technology, China Medical University (CMU), Taichung City, Taiwan

This article has been retracted. Please follow the link to the full retraction notice for details.

Citation: Ma J, Ali S, Saleem MH, Mumtaz S, Yasin G, Ali B, Al-Ghamdi AA, Elshikh MS, Vodnar DC, Marc RA, Rehman A, Khan MN, Chen F and Ali S (2022) Short-term responses of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) to the individual and combinatorial effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium and silicon in the soil contaminated by boron. Front. Plant Sci. 13:983156. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.983156

Received: 30 June 2022; Accepted: 09 August 2022;
Published: 23 September 2022; Retracted: 12 June 2024.

Edited by:

Iftikhar Ali, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (CAS), China

Reviewed by:

Danijela Arsenov, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
Mir Md Abdus Salam, University of Eastern Finland, Finland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

RETRACTED: Short-term responses of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) to the individual and combinatorial effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium and silicon in the soil contaminated by boron

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good