Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 06 September 2022
Sec. Plant Development and EvoDevo

Mepiquat chloride inhibits soybean growth but improves drought resistance

Updated
\r\nXiyue WangXiyue Wang1Qi ZhouQi Zhou1Xin WangXin Wang1Shuang SongShuang Song1Jun LiuJun Liu2Shoukun Dong*Shoukun Dong1*
  • 1College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China
  • 2Lab of Functional Genomics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

Soybeans are an important economic crop. As the most widely used growth regulator globally, the molecular mechanism of mepiquat chloride (DPC) in soybean remains unknown. In this study, RNA sequencing technology combined with ultra-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry were used to analyze the changes in the leaf transcriptome and metabolomics of soybean leaves at the seedling stage under DPC stress. The results showed that differentially expressed genes related to photosynthesis and cell wall synthesis were significantly downregulated at the transcriptional level. In addition, the syntheses of gibberellin, zeatin, brassinolide, and other plant hormones were inhibited in the signal transduction pathway of plant hormones, thereby inhibiting plant growth. In contrast, at the metabolic level, the expression levels of flavonoid differential metabolites were significantly increased, and the proportions of flavonoids in the two varieties were 61.5 and 66%, respectively. The combined analysis of transcriptome and metabolomics showed that the differential expressed genes and metabolites were mainly enriched in the isoflavonoid biosynthesis and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways. Principally, DPC inhibited plant growth but improved drought resistance. Our study is the first to report the molecular mechanism of DPC regulation in soybean, providing useful insights into the rational application of DPC in soybean.

Introduction

As a food and oil crop of economic significance, soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) is the principal source of plant proteins and oils (Liu et al., 2020). For the most part, soybean taming is thought to have started in East Asia. Although East Asia enjoys verifiable benefits in soybean production, the United States has become the world’s biggest producer since the 1950s (Li et al., 2020). In 2018, the United States created approximately 35% of the world’s reaped soybeans (FAO, 2018). Improvements in yield and quality are currently being pursued, and improving yield and wider adaptive breeding are the main goals of soybean crop improvement (Maranna et al., 2021). However, ensuring the normal growth and development of soybeans is a prerequisite for high yield. Soybean growth and development are usually subjected to different natural tension-imposed abiotic stress (such as dry spells, flooding, saltiness, and weighty metals), which significantly reduces crop yield and quality (Deshmukh et al., 2014; Ishibashi et al., 2018). Drought is one of the most restrictive variables for soybean yield among these abiotic stressors. The yearly all-out crop yield decrease accomplished by dry spells represents more than 50% of all yield misfortunes caused by all pressure factors (Wang et al., 2021). Wei et al. (2018) reported the effects of drought pressure at various soybean developmental phases on its yield. The seed yield of each plant was significantly reduced by 73–82% in plants subjected to drought pressure during blooming and podding, and the maximum loss of 100 seed weight was approximately 42–48% under drought stress during podding. Therefore, ensuring the normal development of plants and improving their stress resistance can ensure smooth yield formation.

Mepiquat chloride (DPC) is an environmentally friendly plant growth regulator used worldwide. In addition to balancing plant nutrition and reproductive growth, DPC is often used to control plant geometry (Zhao and Oosterhuis, 2000). Zhao et al. (2019) found that DPC reduced plant height, resulting in a lower and more compact canopy. Spraying DPC on leaves also reduced plant height, leaf area, asphalt, and canopy, increasing light interception in the canopy, thereby increasing yield. In recent study, DPC was mainly used in cotton production and formed a relatively complete system (Tung et al., 2020). However, DPC has also been applied to other crops. In the production of non-oilseed sunflowers, spraying DPC can effectively reduce plant height and lodging risks (Taşkın et al., 2017). In maize, DPC resists lodging by increasing the actual stem strength and lignin biosynthesis (Kamran et al., 2018). Wang et al. (2016) found that timely and appropriate application of DPC could effectively inhibit the plant height of alfalfa, shorten the internode length of the main stem, thicken the internode of the main stem, and enhance the lodging resistance.

In addition, some studies have reported the stress resistance of DPC. DPC treatment expanded the groupings of solvent protein, chlorophyll, and free proline in cotton; reduced the malondialdehyde (MDA) level, and helped improve resistance to pressure (Xu and Taylor, 1992; Reddy et al., 1996; Tung et al., 2018). Luo et al. (2010) found that irrigating the root with DPC essentially affected the growth and cold resistance of sweet pepper seedlings, manifested as enhanced superoxide dismutase and catalase activities, which can more effectively eliminate hydrogen peroxide in the body, increase the accumulation of abscisic acid by increasing the content of osmotic regulating substances such as soluble sugar and proline in leaves, thereby alleviating the damage caused by low-temperature stress, manifested as a decrease in relative conductivity and MDA content. Endogenous restraint on gibberellin/gibberellic acid (GA) biosynthesis by DPC advances plants by repressing cell prolongation and decreasing the internode length (Rademacher, 2000). Additionally, DPC affects auxin transport and biosynthesis and affects the expression of PIN and LAX genes by affecting the expression of YUC and AAO, indicating that DPC affects the formation of lateral roots by promoting the combination of auxin and other hormones (Wu et al., 2019). Presently, the application of DPC in leguminous plants is less reported and research is limited mostly to morphological and physiological characteristics. Moreover, the molecular mechanism by which DPC regulates soybean growth remains largely unknown.

Multi-omics approaches with high-throughput advancements play significant roles in explaining the development, senescence, yield, and reactions to biotic and abiotic stresses in many crops (Yang et al., 2021). Transcriptome investigation plays a significant role in making sense of genome design and capacity; recognizing hereditary organizations of cells, physiology, biochemical, and natural frameworks; and laying out atomic biomarkers of infections, microbes, and ecological difficulties (Jiang et al., 2015). The most prominent platform in plant metabolomics is liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry because it has benefits such as being rapid and highly responsive and having wide sub-atomic weight window and wide inclusion (Zheng et al., 2021). Chen et al. (2021) studied the overall change in sugarcane internode elongation response to DPC using transcriptome technology and observed that the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were associated with plant chemical sign transduction and biosynthesis of a few metabolites, suggesting that DPC not only inhibits GA biosynthesis but also affects multiple pathways. Zou et al. (2021) utilized physiology and metabolomics to concentrate on the effect of melatonin on soybean and observed that exogenous melatonin application further developed the cell reinforcement framework and photosynthetic limit of soybean, changed carbon and nitrogen digestion, and advanced the development of soybean. Combining multi-omics approaches can elucidate gene functions and networks under physiological and environmental stresses (Singh et al., 2013). Qin et al. (2022) studied the response mechanism of two kinds of Lycium barbarum under salt stress through transcriptomics and metabolomics and revealed the intrinsic reason for the high salt tolerance of L. barbarum. By integrating metabolomic and transcriptomic studies, Peng et al. (2021) revealed that flavonoids, abscisic acid, and nitric oxide jointly regulate the frost resistance of Liriope spicata and identified the involvement of the flavonoid pathway, abscisic acid biosynthesis, and the genes and metabolites of NO oxidative synthesis to construct a comprehensive network of frost resistance of L. spicata.

In this study, DPC was sprayed on soybean seedlings to incorporate changes in the DEGs and metabolites using high-throughput, high responsive RNA-sequencing (RNS-seq) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Our findings will assist with a better comprehension of the reaction component of soybean to DPC stress and provide theoretical support for the rational application of DPC in soybean.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and treatment

Two varieties with significant differences in drought resistance at the seedling stage, the sensitive variety Heinong65 (HN65) and the drought-resistant variety Heinong44 (HN44) were selected as experimental materials and provided by the Northeast Agricultural University. The previous physiological tests showed that HN44 had stronger drought resistance than HN65 (Wang et al., 2021). In this experiment, soybean seeds with full-grain, consistent size, and no disease or insects were selected for sowing using the sand pot method. Six seeds were sown per pot and interseeded when the true leaves were fully unfolded. Three robust and consistent seedlings per pot were tested three times. Before sowing for the full expansion of the opposite euphylla, 500 mL of distilled water was poured once a day; when the leaves were completely expanded, Hoagland nutrient solution was poured once a day, 500 mL each time. When the soybean grew to the seedling stage (V3 stage), the DPC solution (100 mg/L) was evenly sprayed on the leaf surface until the leaf was completely wet without water dripping. After 7 days, the samples were collected and analyzed. Water was sprayed as for the control group.

Determination of physiological indicators

From each sample, 0.5 g of leaf material was cut and placed into a pre-cooling bowl, with a small amount of quartz sand and 10 ml of pre-cooled phosphate buffer (pH = 7.8, 0.05 mmol/L) and ground in an ice bath. Subsequently, 10 mL of the pulp was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min at 25°C and stored at 0–4°C. Activity levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) were determined by nitroblue tetrazolium assay and guaiacol assay, respectively. These methods were performed in accordance with the experimental method of Wang et al. (2021). Phytohormones contents were detected by MetWare1 based on the AB Sciex QTRAP 6500 LC-MS/MS platform.

Transcriptomics experimental method

Twelve libraries, considering four examples and three reproduces, were constructed for transcriptome sequencing. RNA extraction, RNA quality appraisal, library development, and assessment were performed by Metware Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The library development pack was an Illumina NEBNext®UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit. The library was sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq stage, and 150 base-matching ends were produced to understand the codes. Channel crude information used fastp v 0.19.3 to get spotless peruses. HISAT v2.1.0 was used to fabricate the file and clean the contrast peruses with the reference genome. The differential articulation between the two gatherings was broken down using DESeq2 v1.22.1, and the P esteem was adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg technique. The evaluation conditions for the DEGs were |log2Fold change| ≥ 1 and FDR < 0.05. Differentially communicated qualities were explained to the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway datasets to acquire comments on the data.

Experimental methods of metabolomics

Test readiness, removal examination, metabolite distinguishing proof, and measurement were performed by Metware Biotechnology Co., Ltd., as per the standard methods. These methodologies have been exhaustively described by Yuan et al. (2018), Zhang S. et al. (2019), and Zhang X. et al. (2019). Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) consolidates the OSC and PLS-DA techniques, breaking down the X lattice data into two types of data connected with Y and immaterial to Y and screening the distinction factors by eliminating the unessential contrasts. Celebrity esteem was extracted from the OPLS-DA results and created using the R bundle MetaboAnalystR. The information is intermediate before the logarithmic change (log2) and OPLS-DA. A change test (200 stages) was performed to avoid extreme fitting. The metabolites were essentially controlled between still up in the air by VIP ≥ 1 and outright log2FC (various changes) ≥ 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using measurable capacity prcomp in R. The KEGG compound information base was used to clarify the distinguished metabolites and guide the clarified metabolites to the KEGG pathway dataset. PCA used R (base bundle) 3.5.0, and OPLS-DA used MetaboAnalyst R (R) 1.0.1.

Statistical analysis

A one-way ANOVA was used to determine the effects of the various sulfur concentrations on soybean yield within each variety. The R software was used to make such ANOVA.

Real-time quantitative PCR analysis of genes

RNA was extracted according to the method of 2.3. The total RNA was reversely transcribed into cDNA (PrimeScript TM 1st stand cDNA Synthesis Kit) using the kit. The primers for quantitative PCR (qPCR) were shown in Supplementary Material File 5. In addition, the PCR procedure was as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, then 40 amplification cycles were performed at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 30 s. The amplification of each sample was tested for three biological replicates, and CYP2 was used as the control gene. To confirm the specificity of PCR reaction, melting curve was analyzed. In addition, the relative expression of genes was calculated by 2 –ΔΔCT method.

Results

Physiological changes of soybean after spraying with mepiquat chloride

We measured changes in SOD and POD activity in two soybean cultivars within 3–9 days after spraying with DPC (Figure 1). With the increase of DPC spraying days, the SOD and POD activities of the two varieties increased, generally showing a trend of first increasing and then decreasing, and the enzyme activity reached the highest around the sixth day. On the whole, the antioxidative enzyme activities of the two soybean varieties were significantly improved after spraying DPC, and the enzyme activities of HN44 were basically higher than those of HN65 under different days, which confirmed that HN44 had stronger drought resistance.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Changes of soybean antioxidant enzyme activities after spraying DPC. Each histogram is the mean of n = … Vertical bars are ± 1 S.E. Within each variety, different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

We measured hormone content of both varieties on the day of sampling (Figure 2). The content of zeatin decreased in both varieties, significantly decreased in HN44, and slightly decreased in HN65, which was consistent with the inhibition of zeatin synthesis genes found at the transcriptional level. In addition, the ABA content was significantly increased between the two cultivars after spraying with DPC, further confirming the improvement of stress resistance.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Changes of soybean hormone content after spraying DPC. Each histogram is the mean of n = … Vertical bars are ± 1 S.E. Within each variety, different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

Sequencing quality statistics

Twelve RNA-Seq libraries were constructed and sequenced. The aftereffects of RNA-Seq are summarized in Table 1 and were arranged from 12 libraries. After bad quality information was erased, every library created 5.357−6.974 million clean readings. GC content of every one of the 12 libraries was higher than 44%. Over 92.9% of the clean reads had scores more noteworthy than Q30 in every library. Clean peruses (90.64–92.31%) were planned for the reference genome.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Quality statistics of sequencing samples.

Identification of differentially expressed genes

To better understand the molecular basis of HN44 and HN65 in the DPC reaction, we performed transcriptome sequencing and analyzed DEGs in HN44 and HN65 under control and DPC conditions. As shown in Figure 3, compared with the control group, 717 DEGs were detected in the HN44CK vs. HN44DPC group after DPC spraying, of which 219 DEGs were upregulated and 418 DEGs downregulated. A total of 2,880 DEGs were detected in the HN65CK vs. HN65DPC group, of which 828 DEGs were upregulated and 2,052 DEGs downregulated. In general, compared with HN44, HN65 had more number of DEGs. After spraying with DPC, the downregulated genes of the two varieties were greater than the upregulated genes, and DPC inhibited the transcription levels of the two soybean varieties at the seedling stage.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. MA Chart of DEGs. The vertical axis represents the log2FC value, which represents the logarithm of the difference fold (log2 Fold_Change); the horizontal axis represents the average value of gene expression in the two samples; the red points represent the up-regulation of gene expression, the green points represent the down-regulation, and the blue Indicates that there were no significant differences in gene expression. (A) HN44 group; (B) HN65 group.

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes analysis

The functions of the DEGs between the two groups were determined by KEGG analysis. The DEGs in the HN44-CK vs. HN44-DPC group (Figure 4A) were mainly enriched in photosynthesis-antenna proteins, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, circadian rhythm-plant, porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, metabolic pathways, and other pathways. In the HN65-CK vs. HN65-DPC group (Figure 4B), the DEGs were mainly involved in plant hormone signal transduction, plant-pathogen interaction, MAPK signaling pathway, starch and sucrose metabolism, and other glycan degradation. The pentose and glucuronate interconversions were also enriched. Notably, in the metabolic pathways of the two varieties, glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathways were inhibited and the related genes were downregulated. Some hormone signaling pathways were also suppressed. In addition, the related metabolic pathways of flavonoids and isoflavones were also involved, proving that DPC had an effect on plant resistance.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. KEGG enrichment scatter plot. The ordinate represents the KEGG pathway. The abscissa represents the Rich factor. The greater the Rich factor, the greater the degree of enrichment. The larger the dot, the higher the number of differential genes enriched by the pathway. The redder the color of the dots, the more significant the enrichment. (A) HN44 group; (B) HN65 group.

Gene ontology enrichment analysis

Figure 5A shows the GO analysis of the DEGs between HN44-CK vs. HN44-DPC. The DEGs were mainly enriched in photosynthesis and cell wall-related pathways in biological processes. The DEGs involved in photosystems, photosystem I, and photosystem II were all downregulated in cellular components. In terms of molecular functions, the DEGs were enriched for chlorophyll-binding, pigment binding, and other processes. Most DEGs were downregulated. Figure 5B shows the GO analysis results for HN65-CK vs. HN65-DPC. In biological processes, the DEGs were mainly enriched in response to chitin, xyloglucan metabolic process, hemicellulose metabolic process, and other pathways and a large number of DEGs were downregulated. In molecular functions, the DEGs were enriched in the xyloglucan:xyloglucosyl transferase activity, glucosyltransferase activity, and copper ion binding. In cell components, the DEGs were mainly enriched in the plant-type cell wall, anchored component of membrane, anchored component of the plasma membrane, and other pathways. In addition, some GA-related pathways were found in both varieties in our study, but most genes were downregulated. In the biosynthesis and metabolism of GA, five genes, LOC100779318, LOC100790757, LOC100805270, LOC100813185, and LOC100793950, were downregulated in HN44-CK vs. HN44-DPC and seven genes were involved in HN65-CK vs. HN65-DPC. In addition, the genes LOC100808546, LOC100794180, and LOC100801187 were upregulated. The genes LOC100813185, GMMYB84, LOC100795921, and LOC100789097 were downregulated, and GA biosynthesis and metabolism were significantly inhibited. Overall, DPC inhibited plant growth-and development-related pathways, such as photosynthesis and cell wall biosynthesis, thus limiting plant growth.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Column chart of GO enrichment of DEGs. The abscissa represents the ratio of genes annotated to the entry to the total number of annotated genes, and the ordinate represents the name of the GO entry. The labels to the right of the graph represent the categories to which the GO entry belongs. (A) HN44 group; (B) HN65 group.

Principal component analysis analysis of metabolomic samples

PCA was performed on the samples to comprehend the metabolic contrasts among the samples in each group and the two varieties among the samples in the group. The difference between samples in each group was small, whereas the difference between the DPC and CK groups was significant (Figure 6). The first component (PC1) scores for HN44 and HN65 varieties were 42.41 and 34.07%, respectively, and the second component (PC2) scores were 19.77 and 25%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the treatment and control groups, indicating that the plants of the two varieties showed significant metabolic differences after DPC spraying.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. PCA score chart of mass spectrometry data of each sample and quality control sample. PC1 represents the first principal component, PC2 represents the second principal component, and the percentage represents the interpretation rate of this principal component to the dataset; each point in this figure represents a sample, and samples in the same group are represented by the same color. (A) HN44 group; (B) HN65 group.

Screening and analysis of differential metabolites (DAMs)

The fold change was combined with the VIP value of the OPLS-DA model to screen for the DAMs. A total of 104 DAMs (79 upregulated and 25 downregulated; Figure 7A) were generated in HN44-CK and HN44-DPC (Supplementary Table 1), including five amino acids and their derivatives, six phenolic acids, four nucleotides and their derivatives, 64 flavonoids, six lignans and coumarins, eight other classes, three alkaloids, one terpenoid, four organic acids, and three lipids. A total of 106 DAMs (86 upregulated and 20 downregulated; Figure 7B) were generated in HN65-CK and HN65-DPC (Supplementary Table 2), including two amino acids and their derivatives, seven phenolic acids, seven nucleotides and their derivatives, 70 flavonoids, three lignans and coumarins, four other classes, one alkaloid, six terpenoids, one organic acid, and five lipids. In the two varieties, flavonoids accounted for 61.5 and 66% of the total DAMs, respectively, and most substances were upregulated substances, indicating that spraying DPC enhanced the stress resistance of plants to a certain extent.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Differential metabolite volcano plot. Each point in the volcano plot represents a metabolite, in which the green point represents the down-regulated differential metabolite, the red point represents the up-regulated differential metabolite, and the gray represents the metabolite detected but not significantly different; the abscissa represents a metabolite In the logarithm of the relative content difference between the two groups of samples (log2FC), the larger the absolute value of the abscissa, the greater the relative content difference of the substance between the two groups of samples. The ordinate represents the VIP value, and the larger the ordinate value, the more significant the difference. (A) HN44 group; (B) HN65 group.

Analysis of the top 20 DAMs

We analyzed the changes in the top 20 DAMs between the two cultivars to explain the various effects of DPC on the two cultivars (Figure 8). Among the top 10 substances upregulated, eight flavonoids were included in each of the two varieties. Psoralidin, eurycarpin A, and prunetin-4’-O-glucoside* accumulated in both cultivars. Eurycarpin A and prunetin-4’-O-glucoside* had a large difference in Log2FC values in the two cultivars, and in HN44, the values were 12.29 and 10.23 and only 2.00 and 2.25 in HN65. The psoralidin Log2FC value was the largest in HN44, and the garbanzol Log2FC value was the highest in HN65. Among the top 10-downregulated substances, erythorbic acid was the most downregulated in HN44, and gallocatechin 3-O-gallate* was the most downregulated in HN65. Overall, DPC substantially stimulated flavonoid upregulation.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Dynamic distribution of differences in metabolite content in the TOP20. The abscissa is the log2FC of the differential metabolites, and the ordinate is the differential metabolites. Red represents up-regulated differential metabolites and green represents down-regulated differential metabolites. (A) HN44 group; (B) HN65 group.

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes enrichment analysis of DAMs

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed to clarify the function of DAMs In HN44-CK vs. HN44-DPC (Figure 9A), The DAMs were enriched in the biosynthesis of isoflavonoid, secondary metabolites, and monobactam and other pathways according to the P-value. In HN65-CK vs. HN65-DPC (Figure 9B), the DAMs were enriched in isoflavonoid biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, caffeine metabolism, and other pathways. Among these, isoflavonoid biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, and other pathways play a significant role in plant pressure opposition.

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. KEGG enrichment map of DAMs. The abscissa represents the Rich Factor corresponding to each pathway, and the ordinate represents the name of the pathway. The color of the point reflects the p-value size, and the redder the more significant the enrichment. The size of the dots represents the number of enriched differential metabolites. (A) HN44 group; (B) HN65 group.

Combined analysis of transcriptome and metabolome

In HN44-CK vs. HN44-DPC (Figure 10A), DEGs and DAMs were involved in 28 metabolic pathways, mainly in isoflavonoid biosynthesis, carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, and enrichment of other pathways. In HN65-CK vs. HN65-DPC (Figure 10B), DEGs and DAMs were involved in 14 metabolic pathways, mainly isoflavonoid biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, and other pathways. Based on the above results, we further analyzed the changes in genes and metabolites in the isoflavonoid and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways in the two cultivars.

FIGURE 10
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 10. KEGG enrichment analysis p-value histogram. The abscissa represents the metabolic pathway, the red in the ordinate represents the enrichment p-value of the differential metabolites, and the green represents the enrichment p-value of the differential gene, which is represented by -log (P-value), the higher the ordinate, the higher the degree of enrichment the stronger. (A) HN44 group; (B) HN65 group.

Changes in the DEGs and DAMs in the isoflavone synthesis pathway

In HN44-CK vs. HN44-DPC (Figure 11A), most DEGs and DAMs were downregulated, except for LOC100800199, which encodes 2-hydroxyisoflavanone dehydratase, and the metabolite 7,4’-dihydroxyflavone appeared to be upregulated. Among them, the log2FoldChange reached 2.37 and 2.27 for gene-IFS2 and novel-550 encoding 2-hydroxyisoflavanone synthase, respectively. The upregulation of these genes resulted in the upregulation of their downstream metabolites coumarin, formononetin, calycosin, glycitein, malonylglycitin, prunetin, 2-hydroxy-2,3-dihydrogenistein, biochanin A, and biochanin A-beta-D-glucoside. In addition, the genes CYP81E11 and LOC100794610 encoding isoflavone/4’-methoxyisoflavone 2’-hydroxylase upregulated log2FoldChange by 3.22 and 4.62, respectively, and its downstream metabolites medicarpin and glyceollin III were upregulated. In contrast, most genes in HN65-CK vs. HN65-DPC (Figure 11B) were downregulated at the transcriptional level. Except for the gene CYP71D10, which encodes flavonoid 6-hydroxylase, and the gene LOC100805931, which encodes 3,9-dihydroxypterocarpan 6a-monooxygenase, were upregulated, while the rest of the genes were downregulated. These genes encode 2-hydroxyisoflavanone dehydratase, isoflavone-7-O-methyltransferase, isoflavone 7-O-glucosyltransferase, isoflavone 7-O-glucoside-6″-O-malonyltransferase, isoflavone/4′-methoxyisoflavone 2′-hydroxylase, isoflavone 7-O-glucosyltransferase, and isoflavone 7-O-glucoside-6”-O-malonyltransferase. However, HN65 had more upregulated metabolites at the metabolic level than HN44, including 7,4’-dihydroxyflavone, formononetin, daidzein, formononetin 7-O-glucoside, formononetin 7-O-glucoside-6’-O-malonate, malonyldaidzin, and malonylglycitin. Although the two varieties were downregulated to varying degrees at the transcript level, most of the metabolites were upregulated at the metabolic level. 7,4’-Dihydroxyflavone was downregulated in HN44 and upregulated in HN65. Malonylglycitin, formononetin, glyceollin III, prunetin, and biocharanin A were the core metabolites of soybean that responded to DPC.

FIGURE 11
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 11. Pathway diagram of isoflavone synthesis. In this figure, red indicates up-regulation of genes/metabolites, and green indicates down-regulation of genes/metabolites.

Changes in the DEGs and DAMs in the flavonoid synthesis pathway

The flavonoid biosynthesis pathways of the two varieties mainly differed at the gene level (Figure 12). In HN44-CK vs. HN44-DPC, the gene LOC100806561 encoding shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase and the genes LOC100783085 and LOC100787507 encoding flavonoid 3’,5’-hydroxylase were downregulated. The gene LOC100820497 encoding anthocyanidin synthase was downregulated. On the contrary, the gene LOC100787267 encoding flavanone 4-reductase, genes LOC100500657 and LOC100776619 encoding caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase, and gene LOC100787267 encoding bifunctional dihydroflavonol 4-reductase were upregulated. In addition, the metabolites 7,4’-dihydroxyflavone and arbanzol, were downregulated and the metabolite epi-afzelechin was upregulated. In HN65-CK vs. HN65-DPC (Figure 12B), unlike HN44, the genes LOC100779814 and LOC100814459 encoding shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase were upregulated, and the gene LOC100783085 encoding flavonoid 3’,5’-hydroxylase was upregulated. The gene LOC100804211, which encodes bifunctional dihydroflavonol 4-reductase, was downregulated. The expression of genes in these pathways showed opposite trends between the two varieties. The gene LOC100780057 encoding naringenin 3-dioxygenase was upregulated, and five metabolites were identified: luteolin, epi-afzelechin, garbanzol, 7,4’-dihydroxyflavone, and isoliquiritigenin.

FIGURE 12
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 12. Pathway diagram of flavonoid synthesis.

Association analysis of the DAMs and DEGs

Correlation analysis was performed on the DAMs and DEGs, and those with Pearson correlation coefficient results greater than 0.8 were selected. Nine quadrant maps and correlation coefficient cluster heat maps were drawn. As shown in Figure 13, in the two varieties, the most abundant DAMs and DEGs were in the second, fourth, and sixth quadrants. They were negatively correlated in the second, fourth, and sixth quadrants, while the upper metabolites were upregulated and the genes were unchanged or downregulated. In the sixth quadrant, the genes were upregulated and the metabolites were unchanged or downregulated. Overall, the transcription level was suppressed after spraying with DPC and the metabolic level increased.

FIGURE 13
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 13. Nine-quadrant plot of correlation between DAMs and DEGs. The abscissa represents the log2FC of genes, and the ordinate represents the log2FC of metabolites. The 1st, 2nd, and 4th quadrants indicate that metabolites are expressed at higher levels than genes; the 3rd and 7th quadrants indicate that the differential expression patterns of genes and metabolites are consistent; the 5th quadrant indicates that neither genes nor metabolites are differentially expressed; The 9th quadrant indicates that metabolites are expressed in lower abundance than genes. (A) HN44 group; (B) HN65 group.

Quantitative real-time PCR

qRT-PCR was used to validate RNA-seq results (Figure 14). We selected 6 important genes for analysis. These genes are mainly involved in amino acid metabolism, plant hormone transmission and so on. Six tested genes ACS, GMPHR20, WRKY63, LOC100800722, LOC100782027, LOC100780856 showed similar qPCR results to RNA-seq. These results show the high reliability of RNA-Seq data.

FIGURE 14
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 14. Verification of RNA-seq results by qRT-PCR.

Discussion

DPC is one of the most widely used synthetic substances for managing plant development. However, its molecular mechanism in soybeans has not yet been reported. In previous reports, DPC inhibited cotton cell elongation by downregulating GhEXP and GhXTH2 and reduced endogenous GA accumulation by inhibiting GA biosynthesis and metabolic genes (Wang et al., 2014). DPC limits plant growth in soybean by inhibiting the plant growth and development-related pathways, such as photosynthesis and cell wall biosynthesis. Wang et al. (2020) found that DPC decreases internode prolongation by repressing cell division and development; DPC significantly reduced the number and length of internode cells, and numerous genes related to the cell cycle and cell divider were changed by DPC treatment. This finding was similar to that of the present study. The DEGs involved in cell wall-related items were significantly downregulated in both varieties. In a study by Chen et al. (2021) on sugarcane, the gene changes between the control and DPC treatment were primarily 6 days after splashing. After 10 days, the effect of DPC on gene expression was reduced. They observed that the gene expression of DPC did not have an intense impact, and it appeared that DPC caused a change in gene expression after 4–6 days. Wang et al. (2014) found that the contents of endogenous bioactive GAs (GA3 and GA4) recorded after DPC treatment for 6 days significantly decreased by 30.4 and 43%, respectively Therefore, the samples collected on the seventh day were selected for analysis to ensure our experiment’s reliability.

DPC application also affects plant photosynthesis and has also been reported to alter the distribution of photosynthates, CO2 absorption, and fixation (Tung et al., 2018). However, this effect was not a single promotion or inhibition. Gonias et al. (2012) showed that DPC could improve the single-leaf Pn and light use efficiency of cotton. However, recent reports showed that with an increase in DPC dosage, photosynthesis decreased by 1–28%, and lint yield decreased by 6–29% (Tung et al., 2018). This may be due to the difference in the DPC dosage. A previous study showed that low concentrations of DPC could promote cotton growth, regulate cotton vegetative growth, and improve cotton resistance. However, high doses of DPC can significantly inhibit cotton growth (Xiaoxia et al., 2013). In soybeans, the application of 100 mg/L DPC inhibited photosynthesis. According to RNA-Seq data, genes related to photosynthesis (including those related to chlorophyll binding, pigment binding, photosynthetic system I, and photosynthetic system II) were downregulated in the two cultivars. Overall, the photosynthetic process is inhibited, but physiological tests are still needed to verify it, which is one of the shortcomings of this experiment.

Plant growth hormones, such as auxins, cytokinins, brassinolides, GA, and strigolactones, play important roles in plant development (Durbak et al., 2012). In addition to GA, we found that DPC altered the biosynthesis and signal transduction of multiple hormones. This change seems to have a greater impact on the sensitive varieties. For example, in HN65, many genes involved in tryptophan metabolism were downregulated and all genes in the auxin-responsive GH3 gene family were downregulated. Their function is to regulate cell and plant growth. First, some genes were downregulated during zeatin biosynthesis, inhibiting cell division. Second, the biosynthesis-related genes of diterpenoids and brassinosteroids were inhibited. These hormones mainly regulate cell elongation, cell division, and stem growth, and the downregulation of gene expression significantly inhibits plant growth. In physiological indicators, we also detected the changes of TZ and ABA content. After spraying with DPC, ABA accumulated between the two cultivars, and an increase in ABA content was also detected at the metabolic level. Generally, plants can adapt to drought stress by controlling ABA content by upregulating the expression of ABA biosynthesis and ABA signaling genes (Zhang Z. et al., 2019). The increase in ABA content also represented a certain degree of increase in stress resistance.

A few studies have reported that DPC can enhance stress resistance. DPC has good systemic conductivity and can be freed in cell biofilms, thereby scavenging free radicals in the cell. Simultaneously, it also affects the antioxidant system, resulting in enhanced activity of antioxidant enzymes (Zhao et al., 2017). However, the physiological response of soybean to DPC is rarely reported. We examined the changes in the activities of the two antioxidant enzymes after spraying DPC, and the activities of SOD and POD were significantly increased after 6 days of DPC spraying. This result also represents that DPC promotes the improvement of antioxidant levels. Liu et al. (2015) indicated that spraying DPC at low temperatures could increase the free proline content in the leaves of Phoebe bournei seedlings, which was conducive to improving the defense ability of plants against low-temperature stress. In this experiment, according to the joint analysis of transcriptome and metabolomics results, isoflavonoid and flavonoid biosynthesis were the main enrichment pathways of the DEGs and DAMs. In particular, at the metabolic level, many flavonoid metabolites were upregulated in the two varieties and were more abundant in HN65. We found that DPC could regulate several key pathways, such as isoflavonoid, flavonoid, flavone, and flavonol biosyntheses, which were enriched. In plants, flavonoids generally exist in seeds, blossoms, and leaves. As secondary metabolites, plant flavonoids play a significant role in controlling plant responses to natural and abiotic ecological variables (Shen et al., 2022). Accumulation of flavonoids is beneficial for plants to resist abiotic stress (Petrussa et al., 2013). In our previous study, metabolomic changes in these two varieties after drought stress at the flowering stage were analyzed (Wang et al., 2022). Four flavonoids accumulated in HN44 and seven in HN65. Drought-related substances, such as luteolin and catechin, were also detected. Ahmed et al. (2021) also reported an increase in phenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and carotenoids under drought stress. Therefore, spraying DPC on the leaf surface at the seedling stage could improve drought resistance, particularly in sensitive varieties. In this experiment, we investigated the physiological and molecular mechanisms of soybean response to DPC, which inhibits soybean growth by inhibiting photosynthesis, hormone synthesis, cell wall synthesis, etc. In addition, DPC could potentially improve drought resistance, manifested as an increase in antioxidant enzyme activity. DPC significantly affected the synthesis and metabolism of flavonoids. However, in order to fully construct the network of DPC regulating soybean growth and development, experiments, including proteomics and more morphological and physiological indicators, are still needed.

Conclusion

In summary, we conducted transcriptome and metabolomic analyses to better understand the molecular mechanisms of DPC in soybean. We found that DPC inhibits plant growth by inhibiting photosynthesis and cell wall synthesis. In addition, DPC changed the biosynthesis and signal transduction of GA and the biosynthesis and signal transduction of other plant hormones, including zeatin and brassinolide. DPC also promoted the accumulation of flavonoids, resulting in increased drought resistance. In the future, we will further analyze the mechanism by which DPC regulates soybean drought stress.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA823397 and PRJNA854192.

Author contributions

XYW: original manuscript writing. QZ and SS: software analysis. XW: investigation. JL and SD: manuscript editing and review. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFD1000903) and funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (Grant No. LH2021C023).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.982415/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

DPC, mepiquat chloride; GA, gibberellin/gibberellic acid; GO, Gene Ontology; Hn44, Heinong44; HN65, Heinong65; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; MDA, malondialdehyde; OPLS-DA, Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis; PCA, Principal component analysis; RNS-seq, RNA-sequencing.

Footnotes

  1. ^ http://www.metware.cn/

References

Ahmed, U., Rao, M. J., Qi, C., Xie, Q., Noushahi, H. A., Yaseen, M., et al. (2021). Expression profiling of flavonoid biosynthesis genes and secondary metabolites accumulation in Populus under drought stress. Molecules 26:5546. doi: 10.3390/molecules26185546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, R., Fan, Y., Zhou, H., Mo, S., Zhou, Z., Yan, H., et al. (2021). Global transcriptome changes of elongating internode of sugarcane in response to mepiquat chloride. BMC Genomics 22:79. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07352-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deshmukh, R., Sonah, H., Patil, G., Chen, W., Prince, S., Mutava, R., et al. (2014). Integrating omic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 5:244. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00244

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Durbak, A., Yao, H., and McSteen, P. (2012). Hormone signaling in plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15, 92–96. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.12.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

FAO (2018). Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. Available online at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed Nov 11, 2020).

Google Scholar

Gonias, E. D., Oosterhuis, D. M., and Bibi, A. C. (2012). Cotton radiation use efficiency response to plant growth regulators. J. Agric. Sci. 150, 595–602.

Google Scholar

Ishibashi, Y., Yuasa, T., and Iwaya-Inoue, M. (2018). Mechanisms of maturation and germination in crop seeds exposed to environmental stresses with a focus on nutrients, water status, and reactive oxygen species. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1081, 233–257. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-1244-1_13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, Z., Zhou, X., Li, R., Michal, J. J., Zhang, S., Dodson, M. V., et al. (2015). Whole transcriptome analysis with sequencing: Methods, challenges, and potential solutions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 3425–3439. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1934-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kamran, M., Ahmad, I., Wang, H., Wu, X., Xu, J., Liu, et al. (2018). Mepiquat chloride application increases lodging resistance of maize by enhancing stem physical strength and lignin biosynthesis. Field Crops Res. 224, 148–159.

Google Scholar

Li, M. W., Wang, Z., Jiang, B., Kaga, A., Wong, F. L., Zhang, G., et al. (2020). Impacts of genomic research on soybean improvement in East Asia. Theor. Appl. Genet. 133, 1655–1678. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03462-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, G., Fei, Y., Tu, M., and Ding, Z. (2015). Effects of CCC and DPC on the cold resistance of Phoebe bournei. Hubei Agric. Sci. 54, 1404–1407. doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2015.06.031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, S., Zhang, M., Feng, F., and Tian, Z. (2020). Toward a “green revolution” for soybean. Mol. Plant. 13, 688–697. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.03.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, L., Xu, F., Hong, S., Weng, H., Duan, L., and Li, Z. (2010). Inducing effects of mepiquat chloride on the chilling resistance of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) seedlings. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 12, 142–148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7303.2010.02.05

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maranna, S., Nataraj, V., Kumawat, G., Chandra, S., Rajesh, V., Ramteke, R., et al. (2021). Breeding for higher yield, early maturity, wider adaptability and waterlogging tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L.): A case study. Sci. Rep. 11:22853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02064-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, Z., Wang, Y., Zuo, W. T., Gao, Y. R., Li, R. Z., Yu, C. X., et al. (2021). Integration of metabolome and transcriptome studies reveals flavonoids, abscisic acid, and nitric oxide comodulating the freezing tolerance in Liriope spicata. Front. Plant Sci. 12:764625. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.764625

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petrussa, E., Braidot, E., Zancani, M., Peresson, C., Bertolini, A., Patui, S., et al. (2013). Plant flavonoids- biosynthesis, transport, and involvement in stress responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 14950–14973. doi: 10.3390/ijms140714950

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, X., Yin, Y., Zhao, J., An, W., Fan, Y., Liang, X., et al. (2022). Metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis of Lycium chinense and L. ruthenicum under salinity stress. BMC Plant Biol. 22:8. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03375-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rademacher, W. (2000). Growth retardants: Effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 51, 501–531.

Google Scholar

Reddy, A. R., Reddy, K. R., and Hodges, H. F. (1996). Mepiquat chloride (PIX)-induced changes in photosynthesis and growth of cotton. Plant Growth Regul. 20, 179–183. doi: 10.1007/BF00043305

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, N., Wang, T., Gan, Q., Liu, S., Wang, L., and Jin, B. (2022). Plant flavonoids: Classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 383:132531.

Google Scholar

Singh, U. M., Sareen, P., Sengar, R. S., and Kumar, A. (2013). Plant ionomics: A newer approach to study mineral transport and its regulation. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35, 2641–2653. doi: 10.1007/s11738-013-1316-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Taşkın, P., Hakan, Ö, Erdoğan, Ö, and Fırat, S. (2017). Effects of mepiquat chloride applications on non-oilseed sunflower. Turk. J. Agric. For. 41, 472–479.

Google Scholar

Tung, S. A., Huang, Y., Ali, S., Hafeez, A., Shah, A. N., Song, X., et al. (2018). Mepiquat chloride application does not favor leaf photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism as well as lint yield in late-planted cotton at high plant density. Field Crops Res. 221, 108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tung, S. A., Huang, Y., Hafeez, A., Ali, S., Liu, A., Chattha, M. S., et al. (2020). Morpho-physiological effects and molecular mode of action of Mepiquat chloride application in cotton: A review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 20, 2073–2086. doi: 10.1007/s42729-020-00276-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Mu, C., Du, M., Chen, Y., Tian, X., Zhang, M., et al. (2014). The effect of mepiquat chloride on elongation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) internode is associated with low concentration of gibberellic acid. Plant Sci. 225, 15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.05.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Yin, Y., Wang, L. F., Wang, M., Zhao, M., Tian, Y., et al. (2020). Transcriptome profiling of the elongating internode of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings in response to mepiquat chloride. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1751. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01751

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Li, H., Yang, Z., Yang, W., and Chai, H. (2016). Effects of peptidamine on seed yield of alfalfa. Mod. Anim. Husbandry Sci. Technol. 4, 12–13.

Google Scholar

Wang, X., Li, Y., Wang, X., Li, X., and Dong, S. (2022). Physiology and metabonomics reveal differences in drought resistance among soybean varieties. Bot. Stud. 63:8. doi: 10.1186/s40529-022-00339-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Wu, Z., Zhou, Q., Wang, X., Song, S., and Dong, S. (2021). Physiological response of soybean plants to water deficit. Front. Plant Sci. 12:809692. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.809692

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, Y., Jin, J., Jiang, S., Ning, S., and Liu, L. (2018). Quantitative response of soybean development and yield to drought stress during different growth stages in the Huaibei Plain, China. Agronomy 8:97. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8070097

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Q., Du, M., Wu, J., Wang, N., Wang, B., Li, F., et al. (2019). Mepiquat chloride promotes cotton lateral root formation by modulating plant hormone homeostasis. BMC Plant Biol. 19:573. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2176-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiaoxia, D., Hailan, J., Jun, P., Tingting, Z., Xingang, M., Jing, W., et al. (2013). The effect of DPC dosage on physiology of cotton during flowering and boll-setting period. J. Shihezi Univ. 31, 1–5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7383.2013.01.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, X., and Taylor, H. M. (1992). Increase in drought resistance of cotton seedlings treated with mepiquat chloride. Agron. J. 84, 569–574. doi: 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400040005x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Saand, M. A., Huang, L., Abdelaal, W. B., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., et al. (2021). Applications of multi-omics technologies for crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 12:563953. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.563953

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, H., Zeng, X., Shi, J., Xu, Q., Wang, Y., Jabu, D., et al. (2018). Time-course comparative metabolite profiling under osmotic stress in tolerant and sensitive Tibetan hulless barley. Biomed Res. Int. 2018:9415409. doi: 10.1155/2018/9415409

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Ying, H., Pingcuo, G., Wang, S., Zhao, F., Cui, Y., et al. (2019). Identification of potential metabolites mediating bird’s selective feeding on Prunus mira flowers. Biomed Res. Int. 2019:1395480. doi: 10.1155/2019/1395480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Jiang, X., He, Y., Li, L., Xu, P., Sun, Z., et al. (2019). AtHB2, a class II HD-ZIP protein, negatively regulates the expression of CsANS, which encodes a key enzyme in Camellia sinensis catechin biosynthesis. Physiol. Plant. 166, 936–945. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12851

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Cao, B., Li, N., Chen, Z., and Xu, K. (2019). Comparative transcriptome analysis of the regulation of ABA signaling genes in different rootstock grafted tomato seedlings under drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 166:103814.

Google Scholar

Zhao, C. Y., Si, J. H., Feng, Q., Yu, T. F., and Li, P. D. (2017). Comparative study of daytime and nighttime sap flow of Populus euphratica. Plant Growth Regul. 82, 353–362.

Google Scholar

Zhao, D., and Oosterhuis, D. M. (2000). Pix plus and mepiquat chloride effects on physiology, growth, and yield of field-grown cotton. J. Plant Growth Regul. 19, 415–422.

Google Scholar

Zhao, W., Yan, Q., Yang, H., Yang, X., Wang, L., Chen, B., et al. (2019). Effects of mepiquat chloride on yield and main properties of cottonseed under different plant densities. J. Cotton Res. 2:10.

Google Scholar

Zheng, J., Johnson, M., Mandal, R., and Wishart, D. S. (2021). A comprehensive targeted metabolomics assay for crop plant sample analysis. Metabolites 11, 5–303. doi: 10.3390/metabo11050303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zou, J., Yu, H., Yu, Q., Jin, X., Cao, L., Wang, M., et al. (2021). Physiological and UPLC-MS/MS widely targeted metabolites mechanisms of alleviation of drought stress-induced soybean growth inhibition by melatonin. Ind. Crops Prod. 163:113323.

Google Scholar

Keywords: mepiquat chloride, soybean, drought resistance, flavonoid metabolism, molecular mechanism

Citation: Wang X, Zhou Q, Wang X, Song S, Liu J and Dong S (2022) Mepiquat chloride inhibits soybean growth but improves drought resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 13:982415. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.982415

Received: 30 June 2022; Accepted: 18 August 2022;
Published: 06 September 2022.

Edited by:

Yoonha Kim, Kyungpook National University, South Korea

Reviewed by:

Chenliang Yu, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, China
Abdelali Hannoufa, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Canada

Copyright © 2022 Wang, Zhou, Wang, Song, Liu and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shoukun Dong, c2hvdWt1bmRvbmdAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.