Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 23 June 2022
Sec. Plant Breeding

An Analysis of Natural Variation Reveals That OsFLA2 Controls Flag Leaf Angle in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

\nJianhua JiangJianhua Jiang1Yuanqing ZhangYuanqing Zhang2Yulong LiYulong Li3Changmin HuChangmin Hu1Lei XuLei Xu1Ying ZhangYing Zhang1Dezheng WangDezheng Wang1Delin Hong
Delin Hong2*Xiaojing Dang
Xiaojing Dang1*
  • 1Institute of Rice Research, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
  • 3Institute of Crop Research, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, China

Flag leaf angle (FLA) is an important outcrossing trait affecting the hybrid seed production in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Natural variation of FLA has been reported in rice, but the molecular basis for this variation is largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the phenotypic values of FLA in 353 rice natural accessions in six environments, which indicated that there was abundant phenotypic variation. We performed a genome-wide association study on FLA using 1.3 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A total of six quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were identified significantly associated with FLA, of which five were located in previously reported QTLs/genes and one was novel. We identified two causal gene loci for FLA, namely, OsFLA6 and OsFLA2; OsFLA6 was co-localized with the gene OsLIC. In addition, the accessions with large and small FLA values have corresponding high and low OsFLA6 expressions. OsFLA2TT allele could increase significantly the seed setting percentage in hybrid F1 seed production by field experiment. We also confirmed that the allele OsFLA2TT increased the FLA compared with that of the isogenic line carrying allele OsFLA2CC by transgenic complementation experiment. The allele frequencies of OsFLA6GG and OsFLA2TT decreased gradually with an increase in latitude in the Northern Hemisphere. Our results should facilitate the improvement of FLA of parents of hybrid rice.

Introduction

Asian cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most important staple foods feeding more than 3.5 billion people worldwide (GRiSP, 2013). With the human population increasing and the arable land decreasing, increasing the rice grain yield per unit area per unit time is an inevitable choice. The utilization of heterosis is one of the effective strategies to enhance rice grain yield (Yuan, 1997). However, it entails the yearly production of F1 hybrid seeds. For hybrid seed production in O. sativa, to remove the barriers to cross-pollination at the initial heading stage, farmers usually cut off one-third or one-half of the flag leaf blade of the parents, which not only requires more labor but also high operating skills to avoid injuring the young panicle (Sakamoto et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2016). In addition, the wound caused by leaf clipping also had an adverse effect on the normal growth of the rice plant. If the flag leaf angle (FLA) in female parents is larger than 90°, leaf clipping can be omitted. Therefore, breeding a male sterile line with larger FLA can not only omit the procedure of flag leaf clipping but also facilitate the mechanization of hybrid rice seed production.

Early research has shown that the FLA trait is controlled by a pair of major genes and a number of minor gene pairs, with a small angle being partially dominant (Shen, 1983). To date, 63 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for FLA have been identified based on linkage analysis, including 9, 7, 6, 4, 4, 5, 4, 7, 6, 0, 8, and 3 on chromosomes 1–12, respectively (Supplementary Table 1) (Li et al., 1999; Yan et al., 1999; Dong et al., 2003; Kobayashi et al., 2003; Luo et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2008, 2013; Cai, 2009; Hu et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012; Bian et al., 2014; Zou et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2016; Ham et al., 2019). In addition, 100 QTLs for FLA have been detected based on association analysis (Huang et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2015; Dong H. J. et al., 2018; Dong Z. Y. et al., 2018). Among these QTLs, only one QTL qFla-8-2 has been fine-mapped and predicted the candidate genes (Zhu et al., 2016). Several genes for leaf angle (refers to all leaves growing on a stem), such as lla, OsLIC, ILA1, and OsARF19, have been cloned (Wang et al., 2005, 2008; Ning et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2015, 2016), but no cloned gene responsible for FLA has been reported thus far. Therefore, it is necessary to discover favorable alleles for FLA to enhance the yield of hybrid seed production in rice.

In this study, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) by combining the FLA of 353 rice accessions on six environments with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data and identified significant SNP loci. Furthermore, we identified a novel causative gene OsFLA2 for FLA using the gene-based association (GBA) method. The function of OsFLA2TT was validated using the transgenic complementation test. These results filled a gap in gene cloning and functional analysis of FLA characteristics. This study sets the stage for further improvement of the FLA of the parents of hybrid rice.

Materials and Methods

Rice Accessions

In our previous study, the three stigma characteristics of 353 accessions were reported by Dang et al. (2020) (Supplementary Table 2). In this study, using the same 353 accessions, we investigated the FLA characteristic following the same field plant and management. These accessions were grown across six different environments, over 3 years (2017–2019) and two locations of Nanjing (32°07'N, 118°64'E) and Hefei (31°52'N, 117°17'E).

Phenotypic Investigation

By following the method reported by Zhu et al. (2016), the FLA of the plants was measured with a protractor at the stage of the panicle on the main stem heading 10 cm above the flag leaf lamina joint. For each accession, the average FLA value of 10 plants was used as the phenotypic value.

Genome-Wide Association Study

The sequences for the accessions are available at EBI European Nucleotide Archive with the accession number ERP000106 and NCBI Sequence Read Archive with the accession numbers PRJNA171289 and PRJNA554986 (Huang et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2014; Dang et al., 2020). According to the method reported by Li and Durbin (2010), we used the Bowtie 2 software to align the reads to Os-Nipponbare-Reference-IRGSP 1.0. A total of 95% of reads were mapped to the Nipponbare genome with a mapping score >60. Then, we used the HaplotypeCaller of GATK 3.8-0 to perform the SNP calling. We used the Beagle software version 4.1 (Browning and Browning, 2009) to impute the missing data in genotype data. Finally, we obtained 1,326,094 SNPs with a minor frequency (MAF) >5% and a missing rate <18% and used them to estimate kinship coefficients and for GWAS. We used the TASSEL 5.2.1 software (Bradbury et al., 2007) to calculate the kinship matrix. Based on the mixed linear model (MLM), the GWAS was conducted using the R package Genomic Association and Prediction Integrated Tool (Lipka et al., 2012). According to the methods reported by Yang et al. (2014), if the association loci exceeded the P-value thresholds (<1 × 10−7) with clear peak-like signals (≥3 significant SNPs) and were in the 200-kb region of the leading SNP, we considered the region as a QTL. We used the R package “LDheatmap” to construct the linkage disequilibrium (LD) heatmaps surrounding peaks in the GWAS (Shin et al., 2006). The Manhattan and quantile-quantile plots were drawn using the R package qqman (Turner, 2014). We used the correction method of Benjamini and Hochberg (1995) to calculate the false discovery rate (FDR) and determine the genome-wide significance thresholds of the GWAS, which was 1.0 × 10−7 at a nominal level of 0.05. The position of SNPs in OsFLA2 and OsFLA6 is based on data from the MSU Rice Genome Annotation Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu).

For GBA analysis, we used the MLM following the equation: y = xβ + zu + e. Where y represents a vector of phenotype; x represents a matrix of fixed effects such as gene haplotype; β represents a vector of effects; z represents an incidence matrix relating y to u; and e represents a matrix of residual effects. First, based on polymorphisms localized on the coding regions, we performed gene haplotype identification using an R script. The difference in haplotype was used as a dummy variable, which was used as fixed effects using the R package “rrBLUP” version 4.3 (Endelman, 2011).

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

The total RNA was extracted from flag leaf and flag leaf lamina joint at development stages 5–8 [as per the criterion described by Itoh et al. (2005)] using the ultrapure RNA kit (OMEGA BIO-TEK, https://www.omegabiotek.com), sampled from the six accessions (three accessions with smaller FLA and three accessions with larger FLA). The RNase-free DNase I treatment (Vazyme, http://www.vazyme.com) was used to remove any genomic DNA contamination. In addition, the HiScript II Q RT SuperMix (Vazyme, http://www.vazyme.com) was used to perform the first-strand cDNA synthesis by reverse transcription from 1 μg of RNA. We used the 18S rRNA gene as an internal control. We performed the qRT-PCR in a 96-well thermocycler (Roche Applied Science LightCycler 480) using SYBR Green (Vazyme, http://www.vazyme.com) and set the cycling conditions as follows: first, denaturation (95°C, 5 min); second, amplification and quantification program-40 cycles (95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s) with a single fluorescence measurement; third, the melting curve (60–95°C) with a heating rate of 0.1°C per second and continuous fluorescence measurement; and finally, cooling step (40°C). We performed the three independent replicates. The primer sequences of qRT-PCR are shown in Table 1. We calculated the relative gene expression of the target gene using the following equation (Pfaffl, 2001): Exp=2−ΔCt, where ΔCt =Cttarget gene - Ct18SrRNA.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Primers used in this study.

Generation of OsFLA2 Transgenic Plants

The full-length genomic DNA of Os02g0142875 was amplified by PCR from A7444 rice and cloned into the pBWA(V)HII vector (Table 1). This construct (pBWA(V)HII-OsFLA2) was then transformed into Nipponbare and 7001S by Agrobacterium EHA105, respectively. Additionally, the corresponding empty vector transformed into Nipponbare was used as a control. Thirty-two independent T1 seedlings obtained were grown to maturity under natural conditions. In the next rice-growing season (May to October), the T2 seeds harvested from T1 plants at the maturity stage were grown in the paddy field. At the tillering stage, the three allele genotypes (TT, TC, and CC) on the Os02g0142875 locus were determined using the primers listed in Table 1, and the FLA was measured in the Os02g0142875TT and Os02g0142875CC plants at full heading stage.

Evaluation of the Utilization Value for OsFLA2 Alleles

We selected isogenic lines 7001SFLA2−CC (small FLA) and 7001SFLA2−TT (large FLA) as the female parents and variety 9311 as the male parent to perform an actual hybrid F1 seed production experiment. 7001S carried the CC allele. 7001SFLA2−TT obtained in this study is an isogenic line. The male parent and female parent inter-planted and the planting-to-row ratio is 2:6:2. At flowering time, artificial pollination was conducted two times each day. After 30 days, the panicle from the female parents was harvested. The seed setting percentage was calculated to evaluate the potential value of the OsFLA2 allele in hybrid F1 seed production.

Results

Phenotypic Statistics of FLA in Natural Rice Accessions

The phenotypic value of FLA was investigated in the 353 rice accessions containing indica and japonica subspecies across six environments. The distributions of average value over the six environments for FLA in indica and japonica subspecies are shown in Figure 1A. Compared with indica rice, the japonica rice population had lower values for FLA (Figure 1A). In the 353 accessions, the mean value of FLA was calculated per environment, ranging from 35.87 ± 20.66° to 38.49 ± 21.38°, with coefficients of variation (CV) across the six environments from 55.55 to 58.48% (Figures 1B,C). These results showed that there existed abundant phenotype variation in the population studied. The scatterplots of FLA across different years and locations were carried out and shown in Supplementary Figure 1, indicating that FLA was genetically stable in six environments. Based on the results of the joint analysis of variance for FLA, we found that there were significant differences among genotypes, no significant differences among the environments, and significant differences in the interactions of genotypes with environments (Supplementary Table 3). These results indicated that although the environment had an effect on FLA, the abundant phenotypic variation of FLA was mainly attributable to variation in genotype.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Phenotypic characteristics of flag leaf angle (FLA) in indica subgroup, japonica subgroup, and six environments, respectively. (A) Phenotypic value distributions of FLA in indica subgroup and japonica subgroup. The number of varieties within each population was 172 and 181, respectively. (B) Phenotypic value distributions of FLA in six environments. (C) Phenotypic statistics of FLA in six environments. The box edges represent the upper and lower quantiles, with the median value shown by the black line in the middle of the box. Vertical lines represent the data from the lowest quantile to the top quantile. Individuals falling outside the range of the whiskers are shown as asterisks. E1, Nanjing in 2017; E2, Nanjing in 2018; E3, Nanjing in 2019; E4, Hefei in 2017; E5, Hefei in 2018; E6, Hefei in 2019.

Genome-Wide Association Mapping for FLA

Based on the mixed linear model with correction of kinship bias, GWAS on FLA trait of 353 accessions with high-quality SNPs (MAF > 0.05) was carried out. The significant SNP associations with FLA were illustrated in Manhattan plots (Figure 2A). We considered the region as a QTL when more than three significant SNPs exceeding the threshold value of 1 × 10−7 were in the 200-kb interval of the leading SNP. According to this criterion, we identified six QTLs associated with FLA (Figure 2B). Among them, two QTLs, namely, qFLA2 and qFLA6, own a relatively large number of significant SNPs 12 and 10, respectively. We considered qFLA2 and qFLA6 as the major QTLs for FLA to analyze further.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) identification for FLA by genome-wide association study (GWAS) in rice. (A) Manhattan plots for the whole population of rice accessions. The vertical axis indicates the negative log10-transformed P-values. The dots above the red line mean the significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the QTL region. The black arrows indicate the QTL identified. (B) Information of the identified QTL.

Allele OsFLA6GG Increases FLA

For the association signal in the 29.63–29.83 Mb region on chromosome 6, there were 40 genes for FLA identified (Figures 3A,B). In this region, 32 of 40 genes contain nonsynonymous SNPs (Supplementary Tables 4, 5). Only one nonsynonymous SNP was found to be significantly associated with FLA (–log10P ≥ 7.0) using two methods of GWAS and GBA (Supplementary Table 4); it was located within the gene locus Os06g0704300. Hereafter, gene Os06g0704300 is referred to as OsFLA6. The full length of OsFLA6 is 3,620 bp, including 11 exons and 10 introns. The SNPs of OsFLA6 occurred in the 2 kb upstream and the coding sequence of the gene. This resulted in four haplotypes of OsFLA6 being identified (Figure 3C). The elite haplotypes Hap 2 and Hap 3 were associated with larger FLA while haplotype Hap 1 and Hap 4 were associated with smaller FLA (Figure 3D). Among them, only one SNP locus (29,739,644) was significantly associated with FLA (Supplementary Table 4), which causes a base change from base A to base G at nucleotide (nt) 328 in the coding sequence, resulting in an amino acid change from threonine (T) to alanine (A) at amino acid 110. The average FLA value of 116 accessions carrying the allele OsFLA6AA was 26.5 ± 11.8°. The average FLA value of 232 accessions carrying the allele OsFLA6GG was 37.5 ± 12.3°. The differences in FLA value between alleles OsFLA6AA and OsFLA6GG were highly significant (Welch's t-test; P = 6.06E−04) (Figure 3E).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Genome-wide association study for FLA and identification of the candidate gene OsFLA6 (Os06g0704300). (A) Manhattan plots for FLA. Red line means the significance threshold (–log10 P = 7.0). (B) Local Manhattan plot (top) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) heatmap (bottom) on chromosome 6. The arrow indicates the position of nucleotide variation in Os06g0704300. The candidate region lies between the red solid lines. (C) Haplotypes of OsFLA6 associated with flag leaf angle in rice. (D,E) Box plots of flag leaf angle in accessions containing the different haplotypes (D) and elite alleles (E). Center line, median; box limits, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers, 1.5× the interquartile range; dots, outliers. Differences between the alleles were statistically analyzed based on Welch's t-test. (F) Relative expression of Os06g0704300 in flag leaf and flag leaf lamina joint at development stages 6–8 from the three accessions (i.e., Ludao, Shenlenuo, and A7444) with a large FLA and the three accessions (i.e., Nipponbare, Kendao 13, and Chenwan 3hao) with a small FLA, determined by qRT-PCR (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, two-tailed Welch's t-test). Data are presented as means ± SE; n = 3 independent biological replicates.

Furthermore, we performed quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis of flag leaf and flag leaf lamina joint at differentiation stages 6, 7, and 8, respectively, sampling from three accessions (i.e., A7444, Shenlenuo, and Ludao) with large FLA and three accessions (i.e., Nipponbare, Kendao 13, and Chenwan 3hao) with small FLA. The results showed that the expression of OsFLA6GG was higher than that of OsFLA6AA in flag leaf and flag leaf lamina joint at differentiation stage 7, but no significant difference was found at stages 6 and 8 (Figure 3F). We also found that the expression of OsFLA6GG in each of the three accessions with larger FLA was significantly higher than that of OsFLA6AA in each of the three accessions with smaller FLA (Figure 3F). Based on the website of China Rice Data Center (http://www.ricedata.cn/gene/list/286.htm), we found that the gene locus Os06g0704300 was identical to OsLIC (O. sativa leaf and tiller angle increased controller), which encodes a CCCH-type zinc finger protein and regulates leaf angle and tiller angle through the BR signaling pathway (Wang et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2012). Research on the function of LIC has been reported, and we will no longer study the function of OsFLA6GG.

Introduction of the Allele OsFLA2TT Increases FLA

For the association signal in the 2.27–2.47 Mb region on chromosome 2, there were 19 genes for FLA identified (Figures 4A,B). Based on SNP information, 10 of the 19 genes contain nonsynonymous SNPs (Supplementary Tables 6, 7). However, only one nonsynonymous SNP was significantly associated with FLA using two methods of GWAS and GBA (Supplementary Table 6); it was located within the gene locus Os02g0142875. Hereafter, gene Os02g0142875 is referred to as OsFLA2. The full length of OsFLA2 is 2,177 bp, including three exons and two introns. Gene OsFLA2 encodes a 95 amino acid protein. For OsFLA2, there was no putative conserved domain detected. The SNPs of OsFLA2 occurred in the coding sequence, the intron, and the 2 kb downstream of the gene. This resulted in three haplotypes of OsFLA2 being identified (Figure 4C). The elite haplotype Hap 1 was associated with larger FLA while haplotypes Hap 2 and Hap 3 were associated with smaller FLA (Figure 4D). For the five exon SNPs, one SNP site (2,372,278 bp) was synonymous, and the other four were nonsynonymous. Among the four nonsynonymous SNPs, only one SNP site (2,372,437) was significantly associated with FLA (Supplementary Table 6). The SNP site (2,372,437) causes a base change from base C to base T at nt 137 in the cDNA sequence, which results in an amino acid change from serine (S) to phenylalanine (F) at amino acid 46. The average FLA values of 286 accessions carrying the allele OsFLA2CC were 28.5 ± 10.5°. The average FLA values of 24 accessions carrying the allele OsFLA2TT were 51.5 ± 13.1°. The difference in FLA values between the OsFLA2CC and OsFLA2TT genotypes was highly significant (Welch's t-test; P = 4.88E−04) (Figure 4E).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Genome-wide association study for FLA and identification of the causal gene OsFLA2 (Os02g0142875). (A) Manhattan plots for FLA. Red line indicates the significance threshold (–log10 P = 7.0). (B) Local Manhattan plot (top) and LD heatmap (bottom) on chromosome 2. The arrow indicates the position of nucleotide variation in Os02g0142875. The candidate region lies between the red solid lines. (C) Haplotypes of OsFLA2 associated with flag leaf angle in rice. (D,E) Box plots of flag leaf angle in accessions containing the different haplotypes (D) and elite alleles (E). Center line, median; box limits, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers, 1.5× the interquartile range; dots, outliers. Differences between the alleles were statistically analyzed based on Welch's t-test. (F) Relative expression of Os02g0142875 in flag leaf and flag leaf lamina joint at development stages 6–8 from the three accessions (i.e., Ludao, Haomake, and A7444) with a large FLA and the three accessions (i.e., Nipponbare, Kendao 13, and Chenwan 3hao) with a small FLA, determined by qRT-PCR (**P < 0.01, two-tailed Welch's t-test). Data are presented as means ± SE; n = 3 independent biological replicates. (G) Images of FLA of transgenic plants transformed with the empty vector (VEC), C allele, and T allele. Scale bar = 3 cm. (H) FLA of transgenic plants. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 20).

The qRT-PCR results showed that there were expressions for OsFLA2TT and OsFLA2CC in flag leaf and flag leaf lamina joint at differentiation stages 6, 7, and 8 (Figure 4F). The expression of OsFLA2TT was higher than that of OsFLA2CC in flag leaf and flag leaf lamina joint at differentiation stage 7, but no significant difference was found at stages 6 and 8 (Figure 4F). We also found that the expression of OsFLA2TT in each of the three accessions (i.e., A7444, Shenlenuo, and Ludao) with large FLA was significantly higher than that of OsFLA2CC in each of the three accessions (i.e., Nipponbare, Kendao 13, and Chenwan 3hao) with small FLA (Figure 4F). These results suggested that enhanced expression of OsFLA2TT might increase FLA.

According to the results of GWAS, no SNP loci located in the promoter region of OsFLA2 were associated with FLA. Based on the website of promoter functional elements (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/#opennewwindow), we found that there were no SNP loci in the cis-element regulatory region. So, we speculated that phenotypic variation between the accessions with the TT allele and those with the CC allele was caused by SNP loci in the coding sequence region. Next, we conducted a transformation of the OsFLA2 gene to confirm it. The genome sequence of the allele OsFLA2TT and empty vector were introduced into Nipponbare, respectively. Compared with the plants of the Nipponbare genome, plants transformed with the allele OsFLA2TT had a larger FLA, whereas those transformed with the empty vector showed no phenotypic change (Figures 4G,H). We investigated the FLA phenotype of plants including Nipponbare-empty vector, Nipponbare-CC allele, and Nipponbare-TT allele, respectively. Twenty plants were investigated for each type. The results showed that the FLA phenotype value between plants with Nipponbare-empty vector and Nipponbare-CC allele has no significant difference. There was a highly significant (P < 0.01) difference in FLA phenotype value between plants with the Nipponbare-CC allele and Nipponbare-TT allele. These results showed that OsFLA2 was the causal gene for FLA on chromosome 2.

OsFLA2TT Can Increase the Seed Setting Percentage in Hybrid F1 Seed Production

The FLA of 7001SFLA2−TT was significantly larger than that of 7001SFLA2−CC (Figure 5A). We investigated the seed setting percentage of the two combinations, 7001SFLA2−TT × 9311 and 7001SFLA2−CC × 9311, respectively. The seed setting percentage of 7001SFLA2−TT was 39.83%, which is significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of 7001SFLA2−CC (30.72%) (Figures 5B,C). These results show that the OsFLA2TT allele could increase significantly (P < 0.05) the seed setting percentage in hybrid F1 seed production.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Evaluation of the utilization value for OsFLA2 alleles. (A) Comparison of the FLA of 7001SFLA2−CC and 7001SFLA2−TT. Data represent means ± SD (n = 40 independent plants). **P < 0.01, Student's t-test. (B) Panicle morphology of 7001SFLA2−CC and 7001SFLA2−TT. Scale bar, 5 cm. (C) Comparison of the seed setting percentage of 7001SFLA2−CC and 7001SFLA2−TT. Data represent means ± SD (n = 32 independent plants). *P < 0.05, Student's t-test.

Allele Frequency Distribution of OsFLA2 and OsFLA6

To elucidate the allele types of OsFLA2 and OsFLA6 loci in wild rice, we analyzed the sequences of 12 wild rice reported by Dang et al. (2020). The sequencing analysis results showed that the alleles of both OsFLA2 and OsFLA6 loci were all found in wild rice (Figure 6). We investigated the regional differentiation of diverse alleles on OsFLA2 and OsFLA6 gene loci. The allele OsFLA2TT (large FLA) is mainly distributed in accessions collected from low-latitude regions, such as southeastern Asia. For OsFLA2CC (small FLA), we found that it is mainly distributed in accessions collected from high-latitude regions, such as northeastern China, and FLA decreases with the increase of latitude (Figure 6). A similar situation was observed for OsFLA6, in which the allele OsFLA6GG was mainly distributed in accessions collected from southern China and southeastern Asia (Figure 6).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. The gene allele frequency differences at the causal polymorphisms of OsFLA2 and OsFLA6 in five geographic groups. The type of reference allele is indicated in blue, and the alternative is indicated in red. Indo, Indonesia; SC, southern China; CC, central China; EC, eastern China; NEC, northeastern China. The accessions from SC were mainly wild rice and indica subspecies. The accessions from Indo were mainly tropical japonica subspecies. The accessions from CC were mainly indica subspecies. The accessions from EC and NEC were mainly temperate japonica subspecies.

Furthermore, by consulting the published database in rice, we selected 30 wild rice (Oryza rufipogon) (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB2829) and 202 O. sativa (http://ricevarmap.ncpgr.cn/two_cultivars_compare/) to analyze the allele frequency distribution of OsFLA2 and OsFLA6 (Supplementary Tables 811). The results in Supplementary Figure 2 show a similar allele frequency distribution of OsFLA2 and OsFLA6 like that in Figure 6 except TRJ. We speculated the reason is that the TRJ in the database was from many sources while the TRJ in this study was only from Indonesia.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the FLA phenotype data in 353 rice accessions and confirmed that there existed a rich phenotypic variance. The CV for FLA ranged from 55.55% (E3) to 58.48% (E4) (Figure 1C). The results of a joint variance analysis indicated that the variations in FLA were the main contribution to diverse genotypes, although significant interactions between genotypes and environments were detected. In conclusion, these results provide the basis to mine the elite alleles for FLA.

In this study, we identified six QTLs associated with FLA, which were located on chromosomes 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 9, respectively (Figure 2). Based on the Gramene website (http://www.gramene.org/markers/), the BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), and the China Rice Data Center database (http://www.ricedata.cn/gene/list/1499.htm), we compared the QTLs identified in this study with the QTLs reported previously controlling FLA. The position range of five QTLs was overlapped with the flanking regions of four QTLs and one gene (OsLIC) reported previously (Li et al., 1999; Dong et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2012, 2013; Ham et al., 2019) (Supplementary Table 12), and the remaining one QTL qFLA2 was newly identified in this study.

Two GWAS signals significantly associated with FLA were identified to nearly single-gene resolution. Gene OsFLA6 coincided with the locations of the gene, OsLIC. Wang et al. (2008) reported that inhibition of endogenous OsLIC expression resulted in a significant increase in leaf angle and tiller angle. Zhang et al. (2012) confirmed that OsLIC modulated the leaf angle by acting as an antagonistic transcription factor of BRASSINAZOLE-RESISTANT 1 (BZR1) via the brassinosteroid signaling pathway. In this study, we further confirmed that OsFLA6 (OsLIC) could regulate the FLA. Gene OsFLA2 is a newly identified gene in this study. The full length of OsFLA2 is 2,177 bp, including three exons and two introns. Gene OsFLA2 encodes a 95 amino acid protein. We have demonstrated that a base C-to-T nonsynonymous mutation at nt 137 in the cDNA sequence of OsFLA2 caused the large FLA phenotype by qRT-PCR, complementation test, and hybrid F1 seed production in the field.

For OsFLA2, the CC allele and TT allele were both present in wild rice (Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure 2). The percentage of the CC allele was greater than that of the TT allele. We called the CC allele an ancestral allele and the TT allele a derived allele. Except for TRJ, as the latitude increases, the percentage of the CC allele was still greater than the TT allele. For TRJ, the percentage of the TT allele was greater than that of the CC allele. For OsFLA6, the GG allele and AA allele were both present in wild rice (Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure 2). The percentage of the GG allele was greater than that of the AA allele. The GG allele was the ancestral allele, and the AA allele was the derived allele. Except for TRJ, as the latitude increases, the percentage of the AA allele was greater than GG allele. For TRJ, the percentage of the GG allele was greater than that of the AA allele. The allele frequency distribution in TRJ was different from that in other subgroups, and the dominant allele GG was the one that controls the large FLA. We speculated that the reason may be due to tropical japonica growth in low-latitude high-altitude mountains in the field, and the light intensity is weaker than that in the plain. The small FLA of temperate japonica rice is beneficial for obtaining high grain yield in pure-line cultivars (Yang et al., 1984) but is adverse for hybrid seed production due to the requirement of removing the flag leaf of male-sterile plants to receive pollen from the male parent (Dong Z. Y. et al., 2018). Therefore, it is necessary to increase the FLA to facilitate pollination in the F1 hybrid seed production. The accessions with the two alleles, OsFLA2TT and OsFLA6GG, can be used to increase FLA in the maintainer lines (pollen parents used for multiplying the CMS lines) of hybrid japonica rice using the crossing and marker-assisted selection breeding method.

Although Wang et al. (2005) cloned the gene OsWRKY11 using a T-DNA insertion mutant lla with a large leaf angle, the leaf angle of mutant lla was not significantly different from that of the wild type, and all the leaves of the plant were still uplifted, which was difficult to be used in hybrid F1 seed production. In this study, OsFLA2 only controlled the FLA. In addition, the excellent allele of OsFLA2 was obtained from conventional materials. The maintainer line with large FLA was selected by back-crossing, and then the male-sterile line with large FLA was developed by back-crossing, which can avoid the procedure of cutting leaves and help to realize mechanized hybrid F1 seed production.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

JJ, DH, and XD designed the experiments and managed the project. YuZ, YL, CH, LX, YiZ, and DW conducted field planting and phenotypic identification. YuZ, YL, and CH prepared RNA samples, qRT-PCR, and transformation analysis. JJ and LX performed the data analysis. XD and JJ wrote the manuscript draft. DH reviewed the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2108085MC100) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571743 and 31601374).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Platform of the National Crop Germplasm Resources of China for providing part O. sativa germplasms and the whole wild rice resources (National Germplasm Guangzhou Wild Rice Nursery).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.906912/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1. Scatterplot of flag leaf angle (FLA) across different years (2017–2019) and locations (Nanjing and Hefei). (a) Phenotype correlation between 2017 Nanjing and 2018 Nanjing. (b) Phenotype correlation between 2017 Nanjing and 2019 Nanjing. (c) Phenotype correlation between 2018 Nanjing and 2019 Nanjing. (d) Phenotype correlation between 2017 Hefei and 2018 Hefei. (e) Phenotype correlation between 2017 Hefei and 2019 Hefei. (f) Phenotype correlation between 2018 Hefei and 2019 Hefei. (g) Phenotype correlation between 2017 Nanjing and 2017 Hefei. (h) Phenotype correlation between 2018 Nanjing and 2018 Hefei. (i) Phenotype correlation between 2019 Nanjing and 2019 Hefei.

Supplementary Figure 2. The allele frequency at the causal polymorphisms of OsFLA2 and OsFLA6. The sequence information of 30 wild rice and 202 Oryza sativa was downloaded from the website of https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB2829 and http://ricevarmap.ncpgr.cn/two_cultivars_compare/, respectively.

Supplementary Table 1. A list of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) controlling flag leaf angle (FLA) published so far.

Supplementary Table 2. The 353 rice accession information used in this study and the mean phenotype value of FLA in six environments.

Supplementary Table 3. The results of joint analysis of variance for FLA.

Supplementary Table 4. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) information in the 29.63–29.83 Mb candidate region for FLA.

Supplementary Table 5. Candidate gene annotation in the region 29.63–29.83 Mb associated with FLA.

Supplementary Table 6. The SNP information in the 2.27–2.47 Mb candidate region for FLA.

Supplementary Table 7. Candidate gene annotation in the region 2.27–2.47 Mb associated with FLA.

Supplementary Table 8. Base information of 30 Oryza rufipogon reported by Huang et al. (2012) (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB2829).

Supplementary Table 9. Base information of 202 Oryza sativa downloaded from RiceVarMap version 2.0.

Supplementary Table 10. Single nucleotide polymorphism distribution of OsFLA6 and OsFLA2 in 30 O. rufipogon.

Supplementary Table 11. Single nucleotide polymorphism distribution of OsFLA6 and OsFLA2 in 202 O. sativa.

Supplementary Table 12. The results of QTLs for FLA detected in this study overlapped with the QTLs/genes of rice FLA reported previously.

Abbreviations

CV, coefficients of variation; FLA, flag leaf angle; GBA, gene-based association; GWAS, genome-wide association study; LD, linkage disequilibrium; MAF, minimum allele frequency; MLM, mixed linear model; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; QTL, quantitative trait loci; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

References

Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57, 289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bian, J. M., He, H. H., Shi, H., Zhu, G. Q., Li, C. J., Zhu, C. L., et al. (2014). Quantitative trait loci mapping for flag leaf traits in rice using a chromosome segment substitution line population. Plant Breed. 133, 203–209. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12146

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bradbury, P. J., Zhang, Z., Kroon, D. E., Casstevens, T. M., Ramdoss, Y., and Buckler, E. S. (2007). TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23, 2633–2635. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Browning, B. L., and Browning, S. R. (2009). A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 84, 210–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, J (2009). Genetic Analysis and QTL Mapping of the Flag Leaf Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Dissertation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Available online at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CMFDanddbname=CMFD2009andfilename=2009152619.nhandv=t4dikr5Wem5YWim9tgUmAhUVrDfH5beas0lG8IXHdhW0Oj4Eessr3OnB0Y%25mmd2BzDhVt

Google Scholar

Chen, L., Zhang, H., Zhang, Q. W., Jiang, J. H., Wang, Y., Chen, J. L., et al. (2012). Association analysis of six outcrossing-related traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with SSR markers. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. 35, 1–9. doi: 10.7685/j.issn.1000-2030.2012.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, W., Gao, Y. Q., Xie, W. B., Gong, L., Lu, K., Wang, W. S., et al. (2014). Genome-wide association analyses provide genetic and biochemical insights into natural variation in rice metabolism. Nat. Genet. 46, 714–721. doi: 10.1038/ng.3007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dang, X. J., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y. Q., Chen, X. G., Fan, Z. L., Liu, Q. M., et al. (2020). OsSYL2AA, an allele identified by gene-based association, increases style length in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant J. 104, 1491–1503. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, G. J., Fujimoto, H., Teng, S., Hu, X. M., Zeng, D. L., Guo, L. B., et al. (2003). QTL analysis of flag leaf angle in rice. Chin. J. Rice Sci. 17, 219–222. doi: 10.1023/A:1022289509702

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, H. J., Zhao, H., Li, S. L., Han, Z. M., Hu, G., Liu, C., et al. (2018). Genome-wide association studies reveal that members of bHLH subfamily 16 share a conserved function in regulating flag leaf angle in rice (Oryza sativa). PLoS Genet. 14:e1007323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, Z. Y., Li, D. L., Hu, X. X., Liang, L. J., Wu, G. C., Zeng, S. Y., et al. (2018). Mining of favorable marker alleles for flag leaf inclination in some rice (Oryza sativa L.) accessions by association mapping. Euphytica 214:117. doi: 10.1007/s10681-018-2183-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Endelman, J. B (2011). Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome J. 4, 250–255. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

GRiSP (2013). (Global Rice Science Partnership) Rice Almanac, 4th Edn. Los Baños: International Rice Research Institute, 272–275.

Google Scholar

Ham, J. G., Kim, H. Y., and Kim, K. M. (2019). QTL analysis related to the flag-leaf angle related with it gene in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 215:107. doi: 10.1007/s10681-019-2434-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, W. D., Zhang, H., Jiang, J. H., Wang, Y. Y., Sun, D. Y., Wang, X. S., et al. (2012). Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of large flag leaf angle trait in japonica rice. Rice Sci. 19, 277–285. doi: 10.1016/S1672-6308(12)60052-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, X. H., Wei, X. H., Sang, T., Zhao, Q., Feng, Q., Zhao, Y., et al. (2010). Genome-wide association studies of agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat. Genet. 42, 961–967. doi: 10.1038/ng.695

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, X. H., Zhao, Y., Wei, X. H., Li, C. Y., Wang, A. H., Zhao, Q., et al. (2012). Genome-wide association study of flowering time and grain yield traits in a worldwide collection of rice germplasm. Nat. Genet. 44, 32–39. doi: 10.1038/ng.1018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Itoh, J. I., Nonomura, K. I., Ikeda, K., Yamaki, S., Inukai, Y., Yamagishi, H., et al. (2005). Rice plant development: from zygote to spikelet. Plant Cell Physiol. 46, 23–47. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kobayashi, S., Fukuta, Y., Morita, S., Sato, T., Osaki, M., and Khush, G. S. (2003). Quantitative trait loci affecting flag leaf development in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breeding Sci. 53, 255–262. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.53.255

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., and Durbin, R. (2010). Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z. K., Paterson, A. H., Pinson, S., and Stansel, J. W. (1999). RFLP facilitated analysis of tiller and leaf angles in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 109, 79–84. doi: 10.1023/A:1003533001014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lipka, A. E., Tian, F., Wang, Q. S., Peiffer, J., Li, E., Bradbury, P. J., et al. (2012). GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 28, 2397–2399. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Q., Zhang, M. C., Niu, X. J., Niu, X. J., Wang, S., Xu, Q., et al. (2015). Genetic variation and association mapping for 12 agronomic traits in indica rice. BMC Genom. 16:1067. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2245-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, W., Hu, J., Sun, C., Chen, G., Jiang, H., Zeng, D. L., et al. (2008). Genetic analysis of related phenotypes of functional leaf in rice heading stage. Mol. Plant. Breed. 5, 853–860. Available online at: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-FZZW200805008.htm

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Ning, J., Zhang, B., Wang, N., Zhou, Y., and Xiong, L. (2011). Increased leaf angle 1, a raf-like mapkkk that interacts with a nuclear protein family, regulates mechanical tissue formation in the lamina joint of rice. Plant Cell 23, 4334–4347. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.093419

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pfaffl, M. W (2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:e45. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakamoto, T., Morinaka, Y., Ohnishi, T., Sunohara, H., Fujioka, S., Ueguchi-Tanaka, M., et al. (2006). Erect leaves caused by brassinosteroid deficiency increase biomass production and grain yield in rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 105–109. doi: 10.1038/nbt1173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, F. C (1983). Inheritance of length, width, angle and ratio of dry weight over area of flag leaf in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Guizhou Agric. Sci. 6, 18–25.

Google Scholar

Shin, J. H., Blay, S., McNeney, B., and Graham, J. (2006). LDheatmap: an R function for graphical display of pairwise linkage disequilibria between single nucleotide polymorphisms. J. Stat. Softw. 16, 1–9. doi: 10.18637/jss.v016.c03

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turner, S. D (2014). qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using QQ and Manhattan plots. BioRxiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.1101/005165

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, D. K., Zhang, H. X., Hu, G. C., Fu, Y. P., Si, H. M., and Sun, Z. X. (2005). Genetic analysis and gene cloning of a large leaf angle mutant lla in rice. Chin. Sci. Bull. 4, 399–401. doi: 10.1007/BF02897452

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Xu, Y. Y., Zhang, C., Ma, Q. B., Joo, S. H., Kim, S. K., et al. (2008). OsLIC, a novel CCCH-type zinc finger protein with transcription activation, mediates rice architecture via brassinosteroids signaling. PLoS ONE 3:e3521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Zhou, G. L., Cui, K. H., Li, Z. K., and Yu, S. B. (2012). Clustered QTL for source leaf size and yield traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol. Breed. 29, 99–113. doi: 10.1007/s11032-010-9529-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, J. Q., Zhu, J., He, C. X., Benmoussa, M., and Wu, P. (1999). Molecular marker-assisted dissection of genotype × environment interaction for plant type traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Sci. 39, 538–544. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900020039x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, R. C., Zhang, L. B., and Wang, J. M. (1984). The theory and method of ideal plant morphology in rice breeding. Sci. Agric. Sin. 17, 6–13. Available online at: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZNYK198403001.html

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Yang, W. N., Guo, Z. L., Huang, C. L., Duan, L. F., Chen, G. X., Jiang, N., et al. (2014). Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice. Nat. Commun. 5, 5087. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6087

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, L. P (1997). Hybrid rice breeding for super high yield. Hybrid Rice 12, 1–6.

Google Scholar

Zhang, C., Xu, Y. Y., Guo, S. Y., Zhu, J. Y., Huan, Q., Liu, H. H., et al. (2012). Dynamics of brassinosteroid response modulated by negative regulator LIC in rice. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002686

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Jiang, J. H., Liu, X. L., Ji, J. Z., Niu, F. A., Zhang, Y. F., et al. (2013). QTL mapping and genetic analysis of eight outcrossing-related traits and its mid-parental heterosis in japonica rice. Chin. J. Rice Sci. 27, 247–258. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2013.03.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, K. Q., Dai, W. M., Fan, Y. Y., Shen, B., and Zheng, K. L. (2008). Genetic dissection of flag leave angle and main panicle yield traits in rice. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 9, 186–192. Available online at: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-ZNTB200809043.htm

Google Scholar

Zhang, S. N., Wang, S. K., Xu, Y. X., Yu, C. L., Shen, C. J., Qian, Q., et al. (2015). The auxin response factor, OsARF19, controls rice leaf angles through positively regulating OsGH3-5 and OsBRI1. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 638–654. doi: 10.1111/pce.12397

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S. Z., Wu, T., Liu, S. J., Liu, X., Jiang, L., and Wan, J. M. (2016). Disruption of OsARF19 is critical for floral organ development and plant architecture in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 34, 748–760. doi: 10.1007/s11105-015-0962-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, C. F., Liang, L. J., Zeng, S. Y., Li, T. W., Dong, G. S., and Hong, D. L. (2016). Fine mapping of qFla-8-2 for flag leaf angle in rice. Chin. J. Rice Sci. 30, 27–34. doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5101

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zou, D. T., Wang, J., Wang, J. G., Liu, H. L., Liu, Y. Q., and Jia, Y. (2014). QTL analysis of flag leaf characteristics and ears weight in rice. J. Northeast Agric. Univ. 45, 23–28. Available online at: http://www.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1391.S.20140109.2250.017.html

Google Scholar

Keywords: genome-wide association mapping, hybrid seed production, natural variation, OsFLA2, rice

Citation: Jiang J, Zhang Y, Li Y, Hu C, Xu L, Zhang Y, Wang D, Hong D and Dang X (2022) An Analysis of Natural Variation Reveals That OsFLA2 Controls Flag Leaf Angle in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front. Plant Sci. 13:906912. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.906912

Received: 29 March 2022; Accepted: 12 May 2022;
Published: 23 June 2022.

Edited by:

Jose Miguel Soriano, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Spain

Reviewed by:

Hu Zhao, Huazhong Agricultural University, China
Joong Hyoun Chin, Sejong University, South Korea
Ashutosh Kumar Yadav, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), India

Copyright © 2022 Jiang, Zhang, Li, Hu, Xu, Zhang, Wang, Hong and Dang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Delin Hong, delinhong@njau.edu.cn; Xiaojing Dang, dangxj@aaas.org.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.