Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Plant Sci., 17 January 2023
Sec. Plant Physiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Regulation of Alternative Splicing in Plant Stress Responses View all 7 articles

Editorial: Regulation of alternative splicing in plant stress responses

  • 1Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
  • 2Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M University System, Weslaco, TX, United States
  • 3Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, United States
  • 4Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 5Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia

Plants are sessile organisms capable of adaptation to various environmental constraints, such as temperature stress, drought, salinity, and/or pathogen attack. To survive unfavorable conditions, plants actively regulate the expression of stress-responsive genes and transcripts. Alternative splicing is a regulatory process where pre-mRNA is variably spliced, generating several transcripts from a single gene, and expanding genome capacity. In this manner, different mRNA transcripts can lead to the synthesis of several structurally and functionally distinct protein isoforms or products, amplifying the diversity of a plant proteome and reprogramming intracellular regulatory networks using a limited number of genes. Recent genome-wide studies revealed that alternative splicing is highly pervasive in plants, with at least 40-60% of intron-containing genes producing different isoforms. This highlights the importance of alternative splicing in plant performance, adaptation, and survival. The purpose of this Research Topic was to collate the most recent advances in plant alternative splicing research, from identifying alternative splicing events to investigating the functions of specific splicing factors involved. A total of 6 manuscripts, including original research and reviews, were accepted and published.

Liu et al. reviewed and cataloged different stress-responsive alternative splicing events in plants. The authors also provide a summary of the different levels of alternative splicing regulation occurring through splicing factors, epigenetic modifications, shared target binding, and adjustment of splice-variant ratios. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination are critical regulators of alternative splicing. Lan et al. reviewed the role of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modification of spliceosome components and how they influence plant development and stress responses. Together, these reviews provide readers with an overview of alternative splicing events and their regulation during plant growth, development, and stress responses.

Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have greatly enabled studies of plant alternative splicing, particularly in non-model plant species. Ruggiero et al. evaluated global transcriptomic and alternative splicing changes occurring among two contrasting tomato genotypes that were either tolerant or susceptible to water deficit stress, low nitrate stress, or a combination of both. Several genes in the TOR pathway, phytohormone metabolism, transport and signaling, abscisic acid, ethylene, and auxin-related pathways, are differentially spliced under stress conditions. Many affected transcripts encode MYB, basic Helix-Loop-Helix, basic Leucine Zipper, WRKY family transcription factors, Heat Shock Proteins, Auxin Response Factors, and Serine/Arginine-rich (SR)-splicing factors. Further functional characterization of these alternative splicing events could enable the development of superior tomato cultivars tolerant to environmental stresses and limited inputs.

Not only are alternative splicing decisions regulated by stress, but they also impact plant growth and development. Similar to human-splicing-associated disorders, perturbations of normal splicing can result in deleterious and lethal phenotypes in plants. Xu et al. identified one such rice albino leaf4 mutant (al4) that is associated with the activation of an exon-skipping (ES) event in a gene encoding the 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase (IspE). IspE participates in the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis. The mutation in the al4 mutant occurred at an exon-intron junction (GT-AG) of IspE, leading to the exon-skipping and producing a dysfunctional truncated IspE protein. The chloroplasts in the al4 mutant are severely damaged and unable to form an intact thylakoid structure, and the mutant plants die at the three-leaf stage. This finding underscored the critical nature of splicing and alternative splicing processes, with significant repercussions on plant growth, development, and fitness.

At the biochemical level, splicing occurs via the formation of spliceosome complexes. The process is orchestrated by several splicing factors, auxiliary factors or co-factors, and small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs). Golisz et al. studied the function of a core snRNP protein, SmD3, in plant immunity. The authors assessed the sensitivity of A. thaliana SmD3 loss-of-function mutants (smd3a and smd3b) to Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato (Pst) DC3000 infection, as well as pathogen-associated molecular patterns such as flagellin (flg22), EF-Tu (elf18), and coronatine (COR). smd3 mutants exhibit enhanced susceptibility to Pst accompanied by marked changes in the expression of several pathogenesis-related marker genes. Transcriptomic analysis of the smd3-b loss-of-function line upon pathogen infection revealed defects in splicing and altered alternative splicing patterns. Curiously, loss-of-function of SmD3-b also impaired stomatal development. Since stomata are critical entry points for pathogens, they propose that malfunction of the stomata could be the primary cause of the enhanced susceptibility of smd3-b mutant to Pst.

Splicing co-factors regulate constitutive and alternative splicing by recognizing and binding to the polypyrimidine sequence between the intron branch site and the 3′-splice sites. Lu et al. performed a comparative genomic analysis and identification of a crucial splicing co-factor, U2AF65A, among diverse plant species from algae to angiosperms. The authors identified 113 putative U2AF65A sequences from 33 plant species and performed comparisons of gene structure, protein domains, promoter motifs, and gene expression levels. Furthermore, functional studies were conducted in rice and A. thaliana. In rice, U2AF65A expression was perturbed by diverse environmental stresses, such as drought, high salinity, low temperature, and heavy metal exposure (e.g., cadmium). Loss-of-function mutant analysis in rice and A. thaliana revealed that U2AF65A is essential for plant tolerance to high-temperature stress and normal growth and development. Collectively, these studies presented new information on the role of alternative splicing processes and the function of snRNPs and splicing co-factors in plants in response to stress. The knowledge gained could be leveraged to improve the resilience of crops to biotic and abiotic stresses in the future.

Author contributions

KM drafted the editorial. KM, EP, AD, and KK. provided feedback and edits to the editorial. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by funds from USDA-NIFA (2021-70029-36056), Texas A&M AgriLife Research Insect-vectored Disease Seed Grants (114185-96210), and the Texas A&M AgriLife Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture to KM, the ANPCyT (Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, Argentina, PICTs: 2017-1343, 2019-01690 and 2020-02865) and CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas) to EP, and the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme No. 121031000144-5) to AD and KK.

Acknowledgments

The editors sincerely thank all the authors who contributed to the Research Topic.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the article was written in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: alternative splicing, post-transcriptional regulation, plant growth and development, abiotic stress, biotic stress

Citation: Mandadi KK, Petrillo E, Dubrovina AS and Kiselev KV (2023) Editorial: Regulation of alternative splicing in plant stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1120961. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1120961

Received: 10 December 2022; Accepted: 28 December 2022;
Published: 17 January 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Anna N Stepanova, North Carolina State University, United States

Copyright © 2023 Mandadi, Petrillo, Dubrovina and Kiselev. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Kranthi K. Mandadi, kkmandadi@tamu.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.