Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Plant Sci., 06 December 2022
Sec. Plant Symbiotic Interactions
This article is part of the Research Topic Role of Endophytic Bacteria in Improving Plant Stress Resistance View all 8 articles

Editorial: Role of endophytic bacteria in improving plant stress resistance

  • 1School of Chemistry and Biological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
  • 2Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Sede Secondaria di Bari, Bari, Italy
  • 3Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • 4The Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Medicinal Plant of Jiangsu Province, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China
  • 5Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics and Developmental Regulation, College of Biology, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China
  • 6Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

Endophytic bacteria inhabiting plant tissues are generally considered to play a crucial role in host adaptation to biotic stresses and adverse environmental conditions (Compant et al., 2021; Oukala et al., 2021). In recent years, the interest in endosphere-associated microbes has grown exponentially (Morelli et al., 2020). A deeper understanding of the biology of bacterial endophytic communities and their intimate relationships with the plant genetic network, is paving the way for advancing knowledge on the microbial impact on the plant stress response, tolerance, and adaptation (Tamosiune et al., 2017). Researchers have recognized that a thorough examination of the interplay between endophytes and their host plants may hold the key to developing multi-factor control strategies for the most common stress drivers affecting plants, especially in unfavorable environments. This novel approach also provides a better perspective to study the potential of endophyte-related biological activities, such as biocontrol, bioremediation, and metabolite production (Pirttilä et al., 2021).

This Research Topic aims to present new research results focusing on the role of endophytic bacteria and the complex interactions they establish with plants to improve host resistance to stress under different environmental conditions.

Endophytic bacteria produce diverse metabolites that may benefit the plant hosts in the growth promotion and control of diseases (Compant et al., 2013). Many different modes of action have been described to explain how endophytic bacteria enhance the ability of plants to withstand biotic adversities (Ab Rahman et al., 2018). In some cases, they could compete for nutrients with pathogens within colonized tissues, secrete antibiotic molecules and antimicrobial peptides, or even trigger plant defence responses and induced systemic resistance (ISR) (Dini-Andreote, 2020). Mutungi et al. showed colonization of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) by endophytic strains of Bacillus megaterium and Enterobacter hormaechei, respectively isolated from the perennial herbs Boeravia erecta and Abutilon fruticosum, promoted plant growth and reduced the severity of the disease caused by infection with Fusarium solani. The growth inhibition of F. solani was also confirmed by co-culturing with these endophytes in vitro. Both strains possessed traditional plant growth-promoting traits for the production of phytohormone indole acetic acid (IAA) and solubilization of phosphates. Similarly, Gupta et al. reported that endophytic strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus, isolated from “tulsi” (Ocimum tenuiflorum) plants, could induce ISR in pea (Pisum sativum) when challenged with pathogenic Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pisi). It was hypothesized that these endophytes could exert their antagonistic and growth-promoting effects by releasing secondary metabolites, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), siderophores, and ammonia, or by mobilizing hitherto inaccessible inorganic nutrients.

Interestingly, the involvement of endophytic traits for phosphate solubilization, iron acquisition, ACC deamination, nitrogen fixation, and IAA production was shown to underpin the mechanism used by Streptomyces lincolnensis, isolated from wormwood (Artemisia annua), to regulate the expression of genes controlling root morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (Fu et al.).

Controlling the uptake and bioavailability of micronutrient, mineral, and trace element levels in plants plays an essential role in plant growth and development. Fine regulation of these steps also involves interaction between the plant host and its microbial colonizers (D’Attoma et al., 2019). Moreover, mobilization of nutrients, nitrogen fixation, and siderophore-mediated iron capture are also the mechanisms most commonly deployed by endophytes to impart tolerance to abiotic stress in plants facing harsh environmental conditions (Truyens et al., 2015; Abideen et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022).

The ability to produce antimicrobial peptides is an additional feature of interest in bacterial endophytes (Singh et al., 2017). Edeines are non-ribosomal peptides with significant antibacterial effects produced by Brevibacillus brevis (Johnson et al., 2020). Du et al. investigated the molecular basis of edeine production in B. brevis, identifying in EdeB a regulatory factor that significantly increases peptide release.

The high-resolution detection power of omics approaches can be used to unravel the complex role of endophytic communities, along with the dynamics of their interactions with host plants (Lucaciu et al., 2019; Agrahari et al., 2020; Anguita-Maeso et al., 2020; Giampetruzzi et al., 2020). Similar culture-independent omics approaches have been successfully applied to the computational analysis of the complex network of interaction between plants and root-associated microorganisms inhabiting the rhizosphere (White et al., 2017).

Gu et al. established new computational tools for ecological network analysis of high-throughput sequencing data. The study revealed that the continuous cropping regime significantly alters the composition and dynamics of the belowground microbiomes associated with different potato cultivars.

Chen et al. utilized high-throughput sequencing to screen bacterial communities in farmlands of South China and investigate whether multiple cropping farm systems alter the stability of the soil bacterial community structures. They discovered that tobacco-rice crop rotation increased the richness of microbial diversity, with potential benefits for soil properties and crop yields. The study provides insights for ensuring soil quality and enhancing sustainable agricultural practices and production capacity.

Chen et al. used 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) rhizosphere to understand whether neighboring maize crops could alter root microbiome assembly. They found that maize coexistence re-shaped peanut-associated belowground microbial communities and induced colonization by plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria, such as Bradyrhizobium sp. and Streptomyces sp., with relevant potential for effective nutrient accumulation and phytohormone production.

Similarly, Zhang et al. (2022) showed that maize could selectively shape its internal microbial community by recruiting bacterial endophytes carrying nitrogenase genes (nifH) to enhance nitrogen fixation. Taken together, these findings reinforce the hypothesis that plants establish a plant-microbial holobiont through a selective co-evolution with their endophytic inhabitants (Fagorzi and Mengoni, 2022) and this, in turn, improves plant fitness and resistance to adverse stimuli.

Modern sustainable agriculture is nowadays looking at this “plant holobiont breeding” approach (Wei and Jousset, 2017) which attempts to stimulate plant-microbial symbiosis by cultivating certain crops while considering the fluctuating interaction with their endophytes, and thus selecting different host genotypes based on their associated microbial communities (Sahu and Mishra, 2021). Future plant breeding should take microbial elements into account since changing the endophyte species introduced from the environment might change the host plant’s genetic background, influencing the resulting phenotypic traits. Gaining knowledge of endophytic communities interacting with newly introduced crop varieties, and attempting their re-shaping, based on effects on plant phenotypic and developmental traits, may represent an unprecedented resource to be exploited to increase crop productivity (Mukherjee et al., 2021).

Bringing together seven original research papers, this Research Topic provides a state-of-the-art overview of the beneficial effect that bacterial endophytes may exert on plants from different perspectives, with special emphasis on their ability to increase the potential of host plants to tolerate biotic and abiotic stresses.

We regard this collective effort as an important opportunity to recall the importance of directing future research on plant endophytes towards an in-depth analysis of their modes of interaction with hosts. Based on this approach, rapid progress could be made in the discovery of natural plant growth promoters and microbial fertilizers to provide sustainable alternatives to the massive use of synthetic pesticides, hindered by the “Green Deal” innovations (Tataridas et al., 2022). We hope that this Research Topic will provide some up-to-date references to achieve this aim.

Author contributions

YL and MM wrote the first draft of the manuscript. X-XZ, JK, SQ and Y-HZ edited the manuscript and provided a critical review. X-XZ submitted the final version. All authors made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

YL would like to acknowledge support from the National foreign expert Program of China (QN2021105002L) and Beijing Nova Program (20220484220). X-XZ, Y-HZ and SQ would like to acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970007, 32172497 and 32270004, respectively). The Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP No. CAAS-ZDRW202201) is also appreciated by X-XZ. This work was supported by research grants 343565 and 308766 to JJK from the Academy of Finland.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the contributing authors for submission of their articles to this Research Topic. We are also grateful to all the reviewers and editors for their valuable effort in improving the quality of the manuscript and providing their expertise in the peer-review process.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abideen, Z., Cardinale, M., Zulfiqar, F., Koyro, H. W., Rasool, S. G., Hessini, K., et al. (2022). Seed endophyte bacteria enhance drought stress tolerance in Hordeum vulgare by regulating, physiological characteristics, antioxidants and minerals uptake. Front. Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.980046

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ab Rahman, S. F. S., Singh, E., Pieterse, C. M., Schenk, P. M. (2018). Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. Plant Sci. 267, 102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.11.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Agrahari, R. K., Singh, P., Koyama, H., Panda, S. K. (2020). Plant-microbe interactions for sustainable agriculture in the postgenomic era. Curr. Genomics 21, 168–178. doi: 10.2174/1389202921999200505082116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anguita-Maeso, M., Olivares-García, C., Haro, C., Imperial, J., Navas-Cortés, J. A., Landa, B. B. (2020). Culture-dependent and culture-independent characterization of the olive xylem microbiota: effect of sap extraction methods. Front. Plant Sci. 10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Compant, S., Brader, G., Muzammil, S., Sessitsch, A., Lebrihi, A., Mathieu, F. (2013). Use of beneficial bacteria and their secondary metabolites to control grapevine pathogen diseases. BioControl 58, 435–455. doi: 10.1007/s10526-012-9479-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Compant, S., Cambon, M. C., Vacher, C., Mitter, B., Samad, A., Sessitsch, A. (2021). The plant endosphere world-bacterial life within plants. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 1812–1829. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

D’Attoma, G., Morelli, M., Saldarelli, P., Saponari, M., Giampetruzzi, A., Boscia, D., et al. (2019). Ionomic differences between susceptible and resistant olive cultivars infected by xylella fastidiosa in the outbreak area of salento, Italy. Pathogens 8 (4), 272. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8040272

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dini-Andreote, F. (2020). Endophytes: The second layer of plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 319–322. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fagorzi, C., Mengoni, A. (2022). Endophytes: Improving plant performance. Microorganisms 10, 1777. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10091777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giampetruzzi, A., Baptista, P., Morelli, M., Cameirao, C., Neto, T. L., Costa, D., et al. (2020). Differences in the endophytic microbiome of olive cultivars infected by xylella fastidiosa across seasons. Pathogens 9 (9), 723. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9090723

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, E. T., Bowman, M. J., Dunlap, C. A. (2020). Brevibacillus fortis NRS-1210 produces edeines that inhibit the in vitro growth of conidia and chlamydospores of the onion pathogen fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113, 973–987. doi: 10.1007/s10482-020-01404-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H., Tang, H., Ni, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y. (2022). Interactive effects of Epichloë endophytes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on saline-alkali stress tolerance in tall fescue. Front. Microbiol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.855890

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lucaciu, R., Pelikan, C., Gerner, S. M., Zioutis, C., Köstlbacher, S., Marx, H., et al. (2019). A bioinformatics guide to plant microbiome analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morelli, M., Bahar, O., Papadopoulou, K. K., Hopkins, D. L., Obradović, A. (2020). Role of endophytes in plant health and defense against pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mukherjee, A., Bhowmick, S., Yadav, S., Rashid, M. M., Chouhan, G. K., Vaishya, J. K., et al. (2021). Re-vitalizing of endophytic microbes for soil health management and plant protection. 3 Biotech. 11, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02931-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oukala, N., Aissat, K., Pastor, V. (2021). Bacterial endophytes: The hidden actor in plant immune responses against biotic stress. Plants 10 (5), 1012. doi: 10.3390/plants10051012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pirttilä, A. M., Mohammad Parast Tabas, H., Baruah, N., Koskimäki, J. J. (2021). Biofertilizers and biocontrol agents for agriculture: How to identify and develop new potent microbial strains and traits. Microorganisms 9 (4), 817. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040817

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sahu, P. K., Mishra, S. (2021). Effect of hybridization on endophytes: the endo-microbiome dynamics. Symbiosis 83, 369–377. doi: 10.1007/s13199-021-00760-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, M., Kumar, A., Singh, R., Pandey, K. D. (2017). Endophytic bacteria: a new source of bioactive compounds. 3 Biotech 7 (5), 315. doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0942-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamosiune, I., Baniulis, D., Stanys, V. (2017). Role of endophytic bacteria in stress tolerance of agricultural plants: diversity of microorganisms and molecular mechanisms. Probiot. agroecosys., 1–29. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4059-7_1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tataridas, A., Kanatas, P., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Zannopoulos, S., Travlos, I. (2022). Sustainable crop and weed management in the era of the EU green deal: A survival guide. Agronomy 12, 589. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030589

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Truyens, S., Weyens, N., Cuypers, A., Vangronsveld, J. (2015). Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 7, 40–50. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12181

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, Z., Jousset, A. (2017). Plant breeding goes microbial. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 555–558. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, R. A., III, Rivas-Ubach, A., Borkum, M. I., Köberl, M., Bilbao, A., Colby, S. M., et al. (2017). The state of rhizospheric science in the era of multi-omics: A practical guide to omics technologies. Rhizosphere 3, 212–221. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.05.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Zhang, M., Huang, S., Li, L., Gao, Q., Wang, Y., et al. (2022). A highly conserved core bacterial microbiota with nitrogen-fixation capacity inhabits the xylem sap in maize plants. Nat. Commun. 13, 3361. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31113-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: endophytic bacteria, plant stress resistance, plant growth-promoting bacteria, plant-microbe interaction, holobiont, omics

Citation: Liu Y, Morelli M, Koskimäki JJ, Qin S, Zhu Y-H and Zhang X-X (2022) Editorial: Role of endophytic bacteria in improving plant stress resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1106701. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1106701

Received: 24 November 2022; Accepted: 28 November 2022;
Published: 06 December 2022.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Andrea Genre, University of Turin, Italy

Copyright © 2022 Liu, Morelli, Koskimäki, Qin, Zhu and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiao-Xia Zhang, zhangxiaoxia@caas.cn; Yong-Hua Zhu, yonghuaz@outlook.com; Sheng Qin, shengqin@jsnu.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.