Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Plant Sci., 12 October 2022
Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions
This article is part of the Research Topic Fusarium Pathogenesis: Infection Mechanisms and Disease Progression in Host Plants View all 9 articles

Editorial: Fusarium pathogenesis: Infection mechanisms and disease progression in host plants

  • 1Department of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
  • 2Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Peoria, IL, United States
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China

Fusarium is one of the most important fungal plant pathogens, which cause severe diseases on numerous crops (Leslie and Summerell, 2013). The diseases reduce crop yield, thereby resulting in economic losses (Nganje et al., 2004; Viljoen et al., 2020). In addition, some Fusarium spp. can produce mycotoxins that contaminate, in particular, infected grains and pose a threat to human and animal health (Escrivá et al., 2015). Fusarium spp. adopt intricate pathways to suppress plant defenses. The pathogens invade the host and colonize it utilizing various infection strategies. In the Fusarium genome, in addition to a region responsible for primary metabolism (core genome), there are regions responsible for pathogen virulence (adaptive genome) (Ma et al., 2013). The understanding of the mechanisms that Fusarium uses to overcome host defenses will provide novel targets to control diseases. Therefore, this Research Topic aimed to highlight the recent works on key species of Fusarium and their interactions with hosts. This Research Topic attracted 16 manuscripts, of which 8 were accepted and published. The articles cover important outcomes of Fusarium pathogenesis, and some key aspects are summarized below.

Genetic exchange in Fusarium oxysporum (Fo) can occur via horizontal chromosome transfer (HCT), a process involving the transfer of “accessory” chromosomes (Ma et al., 2010). In plant pathogenic strains of Fo, accessory chromosomes that are acquired via HCT may have the genes required for host-specific pathogenicity. The review paper of Epstein et al. highlights aspects of the biology of F. oxysporum f. sp. apii (Foa) race 4 and its interactions with the hosts that could potentially apply to other Fusarium pathosystems. In detail, if Foa race 4 and another forma specialis, F. oxysporum f. sp. coriandri (Foci), co-occur in the same host (i.e., coriander) under conditions conducive for either somatic compatibility or conidial anastomosis tube formation, Foa and Foci could perform nuclear transfer and subsequently HCT. This could lead to the development of more virulent genotypes that could elude the defenses of additional plant species and thereby cause more severe economic loss under projected climatic conditions.

Effectors play a key role during fungus-plant interactions. Numerous effectors have been identified in fungal plant pathogens and some of them have been characterized for their virulence functions (Tariqjaveed et al., 2021). Although endophytic and beneficial interactions of Fo with plants are common, there are relatively few investigations of such interactions at the molecular level (Pereira et al., 2019). The molecular basis that determines endophytic or pathogenic lifestyle is still not well understood. In this context, the paper of Constantin et al. proposes that pathogenicity is an exception and is triggered by a specific set of effector genes that expressed when interacted with a susceptible host. Conversely, an endophytic behavior is common for Fo, which may be determined by core effectors.

Interestingly, the paper of Wang et al. describes that the small, secreted protein FoSsp1 stimulates host defenses and negatively controls virulence in F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4 (Foc4). In general, during the colonization process, vascular wilt fungi, secrete small cysteine-rich proteins to suppress plant immunity (Niu et al., 2021). FoSsp1 could function as a putative elicitor that induces high expression of host defense-associated genes and, therefore, negatively regulates conidiation and virulence of pathogens.

In a similar context, the contribution of Yue et al. describes that transgenic tomato overexpressing a lectin receptor-like kinase, SlLecRK1, provides resistance to F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici (Forl). The roles of lectin receptor-like kinases (LecRKs) in defensive responses and immunity in many hosts are critical. The authors suggested that LecRKs enahnce the resistance of tomato plants to Forl principally by activating ethylene-responsive transcription factor genes.

Host responses to Fusarium infection could also be affected by input made by farmers during cultivation. For example, Fusarium wilt of banana (FWB) may be exacerbated by nitrogen (N) fertilizers that are routinely applied during banana cultivation (Segura-Mena et al., 2021). To better understand this effect of N, the contribution of Orr et al. indicates that the host defenses to FWB were influenced by the application of N, particularly in the form of ammonium. The authors revealed that levels of N applied changed the expression of host metabolic pathways that are related to stress response signaling. For instance, a negative correlation between pathogenesis-related protein 1, a well-known marker for biotic stress response, and the rate of ammonium fertilizer was reported by the authors.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production is an initial defense reaction during plant-pathogen interactions. Nevertheless, the roles of ROS during the progress of Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) of cereals remain unclear. For this reason, the paper of Hao et al. investigated immune responses in wheat triggered by chitin, a major component of fungal cell walls. In wheat rachises and rachis nodes, which are critical barriers for FHB spread in wheat, ROS were induced by chitin. In addition, the authors described that different defense gene expressions occurred in rachis nodes and wheat heads treated with chitin or infected with Fusarium graminearum, the most important causal agent of FHB. These results highlight wheat tissue-specific immune responses triggered by chitin.

An environmentally friendly approach to decrease the risk of yield losses and mycotoxin contamination is to use wheat cultivars with stable resistance to FHB. In this context, Yan et al. evaluated FHB resistance in more than 400 wheat lines with natural infection in different locations. Cultivation area and variety had an important influence on FHB and mycotoxins accumulation. Considering climatic elements, rainfall and relative humidity were key factors linked with FHB severity.

Some Fusarium spp. can co-occur with other fungal pathogens in host tissue. This is the case of Fusarium pseudograminearum and Rhizoctonia cerealis, causal agents of Fusarium crown rot (FCR) and sharp eyespot of common wheat, respectively. Up to date, there has been no information on the resistance of wheat against these two pathogens. In the contribution of Qi et al., TaWAK-6D, a wall-associated kinase (WAK) encoded by a gene located on chromosome 6D, was identified as able to confer resistance to both F. pseudograminearum and R. cerealis infection.

In conclusion, the collection of articles on this Research Topic shows the dense network of relationships that occur during Fusarium-plant interactions. The collected contributions have highlighted the key factors that surely will contribute to the control of this important group of plant pathogens.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Acknowledgments

The editors would like to thank all reviewers who evaluated manuscripts for this Research Topic and Dr. S. Tjamos to edit an article on this Research Topic.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Escrivá, L., Font, G., Manyes, L. (2015). In vivo toxicity studies of Fusarium mycotoxins in the last decade: A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 78, 185–206. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.02.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leslie, J. F., Summerell, B. A. (2013). “An overview of Fusarium”, in Fusarium: Genomics, molecular and cellular biology. Eds. Brown, D. W., Proctor, R. H. (Norfolk: Caister Academic Press), 1–9.

Google Scholar

Ma, L., Geiser, D. M., Proctor, R. H., Rooney, A. P., O’Donnell, K., Trail, F., et al. (2013). Fusarium pathogenomics. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 67, 399–416. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155650

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, L., van der Does, H. C., Borkovich, K. A., Coleman, J. J., Daboussi, M., Di Pietro, A., et al. (2010). Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium. Nature 464, 367–373. doi: 10.1038/nature08850

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nganje, W. E., Bangsund, D. A., Leistritz, F. L., Wilson, W. W., Tiapo, N. M. (2004). Regional economic impacts of Fusarium head blight in wheat and barley. Rev. Agric. Econ. 26, 332–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00183.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niu, X., Yang, G., Lin, H., Liu, Y., Li, P., Zheng, A. (2021). A novel small cysteine-rich effector, RsSCR10 in Rhizoctonia solani is sufficient to trigger plant cell death. Front. Microbiol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.684923

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pereira, E., Vázquez de Aldana, B. R., San Emeterio, L., Zabalgogeazcoa, I. (2019). A survey of culturable fungal endophytes from Festuca rubra susp. pruinosa, a grass from marine cliffs, reveals a core microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Segura-Mena, R. A., Stoorvogel, J. J., García-Bastidas, F., Salacinas-Niez, M., Kema, G. H., Sandoval, J. A. (2021). Evaluating the potential of soil management to reduce the effect of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense in banana (Musa AAA). Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 160, 441–455. doi: 10.1007/s10658-021-02255-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tariqjaveed, M., Mateen, A., Wang, S., Qiu, S., Zheng, X., Zhang, J., et al. (2021). Versatile effectors of phytopathogenic fungi target host immunity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63, 1856–1873. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Viljoen, A., Ma, L., Molina, A. B. (2020). “Fusarium wilt (Panama disease) and monoculture in banana production: Resurgence of a century-old disease”, in Emerging plant diseases and global food security. Eds. Ristaino, J. B., Records, A. (St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: APS Publications), 159–184. doi: 10.1094/9780890546383.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Fusarium, virulence, effectors, host defense, host-pathogen interaction

Citation: Beccari G, Hao G and Liu H (2022) Editorial: Fusarium pathogenesis: Infection mechanisms and disease progression in host plants. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1020404. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1020404

Received: 16 August 2022; Accepted: 09 September 2022;
Published: 12 October 2022.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Brigitte Mauch-Mani, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland

Copyright © 2022 Beccari, Hao and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guixia Hao, guixia.hao@usda.gov

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.