- 1College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Key Laboratory of Plant Secondary Metabolism and Regulation in Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China
- 2State Key Laboratory of Dao-di Herbs, National Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- 3Eastern China Conservation Centre for Wild Endangered Plant Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai, China
- 4Faculty of Medical Sciences, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname
Tanshinones found in Salvia species are the main active compounds for the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, but their contents are hugely different in different species. For example, tanshinone IIA content in Salvia castanea Diels f. tomentosa Stib. is about 49 times higher than that in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. The molecular mechanism responsible for this phenomenon remains largely unknown. To address this, we performed comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea. A total of 296 genes in S. castanea and 125 genes in S. miltiorrhiza were highly expressed at both the transcriptional and proteome levels, including hormone signal regulation, fungus response genes, transcription factors, and CYP450. Among these differentially expressed genes, the expression of SmWRKY61 was particularly high in S. castanea. Overexpression of SmWRKY61 in S. miltiorrhiza could significantly increase the content of tanshinone I and tanshinone IIA, which were 11.09 and 33.37 times of the control, respectively. Moreover, SmWRKY61 had a strong regulatory effect, elevating the expression levels of tanshinone pathway genes such as DXS2, CMK, HMGS2, 1, KSL1, KSL2, CYP76AH1, and CYP76AK3. For the WRKY family, 79 SmWRKYs were originally obtained and classified into three main groups. Collinearity analysis indicated a more specific extension of WRKY gene family in Salvia genus. In 55 Salvia species, only 37 species contained the WRKY61 sequence, and high SmWRKY61 expression in some Salvia L. species was often accompanied by high tanshinone accumulation. The above results suggest that SmWRKY61 is a highly effective regulator of tanshinone accumulation and may be a key factor resulting in high tanshinone accumulation in S. castanea.
Introduction
Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (S. miltiorrhiza), a perennial herb in Salvia L. (Lamiaceae: Nepetoideae: Mentheae: Salviinae) (Xu et al., 2016), has high medicinal and economic value (Ma et al., 2012). It is known for its pharmacologically effective chemical components (Fang et al., 2018), primarily diterpene quinone compounds (e.g., tanshinone IIA, cryptotanshinone, dihydrotanshinone I, isocryptotanshinone, and przewaquinone) and polyphenolic compounds (e.g., rosmarinic acid, caffeic acid, and salvianolic acid) (Kai et al., 2011). Tanshinones are important bioactive terpenoids distributed in Salvia L., and the biosynthesis of tanshinone depends on the mevalonate pathway (MVA) in the cytoplasm and the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway in the plasmid (Rohmer et al., 1993; Newman and Chappell, 1999). MVA and MEP pathways result in the formation of intermediates, isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) (Shi et al., 2016). IPP and DMAPP are catalyzed to produce the precursor of geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP) by geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase (GGPPS) (Kai et al., 2010). GGPP can be synthesized to ferruginol by copalyl diphosphate synthase (CPS), ent-kaurene synthase-like (KSL), and P450 family protein CYP76AH1 (Kai et al., 2010). The CPS and KSL may act as important key enzymes for the formation of various diterpenoids in S. miltiorrhiza, including tanshinones, gibberellins, and ent-13-epi-manoyl oxide (Gao et al., 2009). Many downstream steps of the tanshinone biosynthetic pathway may be catalyzed by cytochrome P450 (CYP450s), including CYP76AHs, CYP76AKs, and CYP71Ds (Guo et al., 2013; Zi et al., 2014; Guo et al., 2016; Ma et al., 2021).
Salvia castanea Diels f. tomentosa Stib, distributed in Tibet at an altitude of 2,500–3,750 m, is used as a substitute for S. miltiorrhiza for the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases (Li et al., 2008). S. castanea produces high contents of rosmarinic acid (9.5 times of S. miltiorrhiza) and high contents of tanshinone IIA (4.7 times of S. miltiorrhiza), but little salvianolic acid B (0.02 times of S. miltiorrhiza) (Yang et al., 2009). Caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid are the main phenolic compounds in S. castanea (Yang et al., 2009, 2012). Its leaves are densely covered with gray downy hairs, purplish-brown corolla, and oblique incomplete pubescent rings on the inner surface (Supplementary Figures 1A,B). S. castanea has thick, twisted, and purplish-brown striped roots, which are generally unbranched and form four prisms (Supplementary Figures 1C,D). Crosssections of the roots show that S. castanea roots are twisted together, whereas S. miltiorrhiza has only one root with gray yellow or purplish brown xylem and yellow and white vessels (Supplementary Figures 1E,F). The high accumulation of secondary metabolites and the peculiar morphological characteristics of S. castanea may make it adaptable to various environment and climate changes. These differences manifest that S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea differ in secondary metabolism and morphological features, but the mechanisms underlying this difference are still unknown.
Transcriptomics data and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ)-based quantitative proteomics analysis brings new insight to reveal some new genes of tanshinone biosynthesis. With the rapid development of sequencing technology, a high-quality reference genome of S. miltiorrhiza information was obtained by combining PacBio sequencing technologies. Comparative transcriptomics techniques can be used to understand the differential expression of genes in specific tissues at specific times, to discover genes associated with specific physiological functions, and to infer the physiological functions of unknown genes (Gao et al., 2009). Proteomics has become one of the main approaches used to analyze and understand biological systems. The study of the omeics-related differentially expressed genes in S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea may provide the basis for further study on transcriptional regulation of secondary metabolism.
The present study was about to elucidate the accumulation mechanisms of tanshinones and polyphenolic acids in S. castanea and S. miltiorrhiza by comparatively analyzing the transcriptome and proteome. We identified dozens of differentially expressed transcription factors, in which we found that SmWRKY61 in S. castanea was 4.12 times higher than that in S. miltiorrhiza at the transcriptional level. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to determine the expression of WRKYs. SmWRKY61 was expressed 5,564 times higher than S. miltiorrhiza, indicating that SmWRKY61 was an important regulatory factor for high tanshinone accumulation in S. castanea. Overexpression of SmWRKY61 in S. miltiorrhiza could significantly increase the contents of tanshinone I and tanshinone IIA. Subsequently, analyses of chromosome distribution, gene duplications, phylogeny, synteny analysis, global expression, phylogenetic and motif compositions analyses were further performed to identify the molecular evolution of specific WRKY61 in 55 species of Salvia L.
Results
Accumulation of Tanshinones and Polyphenolic Acids in Salvia castanea and Salvia miltiorrhiza Hairy Roots
In the present study, phenolic acid compounds (caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid, and salvianolic acid B) and lipid-soluble tanshinone compounds (dihydrotanshinone, cryptotanshinone, tanshinone I, and tanshinone IIA) were examined in the hairy roots of S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea. In general, the contents of tanshinone and phenolic acid in S. castanea were higher than those in S. miltiorrhiza. Specifically, the rosmarinic acid and caffeic acid levels in S. castanea were found to be 17.98 and 3.83 times higher than those in S. miltiorrhiza, respectively (Figure 1). Similarly, the tanshinone IIA and cryptotanshinone contents were 49.28 and 2.28 times higher than S. castanea, respectively (Figure 1). In contrast, the levels of dihydrotanshinone (3.32 times higher) and tanshinone I (3.07 times higher) were higher in S. miltiorrhiza than S. castanea (Figure 1). Collectively, these results demonstrated that although the active compounds in the two species were similar, but their relative abundances were different, which was consistent with our previous research (Fang et al., 2018).
Figure 1. Contents of tanshinones and polyphenolic compounds in Salvia miltiorrhiza and Salvia castanea hairy roots. HPLC analysis of phenolic acids and tanshinones in S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea hairy roots. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD, n = 3 biologically independent samples; “*” represents 0.01 < p < 0.05, “**” represents p < 0.01).
Comparative Transcriptomics Analysis of Salvia miltiorrhiza and Salvia castanea to Identify Differentially Expressed Biosynthetic Genes and Transcription Factors
To obtain an overview of the S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea transcriptomes, total RNA samples were obtained after 24 days of hairy root growth. A total of 29,644,212 sequence reads from the S. miltiorrhiza transcriptome and 35,421,130 sequence reads from the S. castanea transcriptome were generated. Among them, 6,897 sequences were in S. castanea and 5,506 were upregulated in S. miltiorrhiza (Supplementary Table 1). At the transcriptional level, 12,403 significantly differentially expressed genes were annotated into 32 metabolic pathways (Supplementary Figure 8).
Hormone-related signaling molecules are the key plant-specific signaling molecules, which can respond to various environmental stress and are involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites, such as jamonates signaling, abscisic acid pathway, and gibberellin signaling (Supplementary Figure 8). Further analysis revealed that 12 genes were significantly differentially expressed and related to jasmonic acid signaling (Supplementary Table 2). Lipoxygenase (LOX), a key gene involved in jasmonates signaling pathway, acting as a potent signaling molecule in plants, was related to important secondary metabolites. The sequence similarity between comp22754_c0_seq1 and lipoxygenase was up to 73%, indicating that comp22754_c0_seq1 may regulate the synthesis of tanshinone or salvianolic acid by affecting the jasmonic acid signaling pathway. Likewise, 116 sequences belonged to abscisic acid response genes (Supplementary Table 3), of which 39 sequences were significantly differentially expressed. ApNAC1 can regulate biosynthesis of androstenone in Andrographis paniculate (Jian et al., 2017). Our study found that the comp8895_c0 sequence was similar to the ApNAC1 sequence, indicating that comp8895_c0 may be related to the synthesis of tanshinone (Jian et al., 2017). Twenty-seven sequences belonged to gibberellin response genes (Supplementary Table 4), of which 11 sequences were significantly differential expressed.
Research has revealed that transcription factors can regulate multiple genes involved in all kinds of biosynthetic pathways. Our research found that 80 MYB transcription factors were differentially expressed in S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea (Supplementary Table 6). MYB transcription factors are possibly involved in regulating the phenolic acids pathway in S. miltiorrhiza. A recent study showed that SmMYB1 activated some genes involved in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway (Zhou et al., 2021), which was significantly upregulated in S. castanea. Therefore, we speculated that SmMYB1 can regulate the contents of phenolic acids. The bHLH (basic helix–loop–helix) family is the most widely present transcription factors family, which may play a key role in regulating the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (Zhang et al., 2020). Correspondingly, 68 bHLH transcription factors were differentially expressed in S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea (Supplementary Table 7). Overexpression of SmbHLH3 decreased both the polyphenolic compounds and tanshinone contents (Zhang et al., 2020), which were significantly upregulated in S. castanea. The overexpression of SmbHLH148 significantly increased phenolic acid and tanshinone components (Xing et al., 2018a), which were downregulated in S. castanea. The WRKY family is a large transcription factors family that can regulate secondary metabolite biosynthesis, and 25 WRKY transcription factors (Supplementary Table 8) were differentially expressed in S. castanea. Typically, overexpression of SmWRKY9 can significantly stimulate rosmarinic acid accumulation, which may directly and positively regulate the expression of SmRAS1 and SmCYP98A14 to promote the biosynthesis of rosmarinic acid (Zhang, 2019). SmWRKY61 showed a significantly differential expression, and its RPKM in S. castanea was 32.23, which was 4.12 times higher in S. miltiorrhiza. It is reasonable to assume that SmWRKY9 and SmWRKY61 could activate key enzyme genes in downstream pathway, regulating the accumulation of tanshinone and salvianolic acid. These transcription factors may be one of the reasons for the high accumulation of tanshinone IIA and low accumulation of salvianolic acid.
Post-modification enzymes cytochrome P450s (CYP450s) were involved in plant secondary metabolic pathways. With the discovery of the terpenoid biosynthesis pathway, CYP450s widely took part in the downstream reaction of tanshinone biosynthetic steps. We found 139 cytochrome P450 (CYP450) genes (Supplementary Table 9) differentially expressed between S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea. CYP71D subfamily members were functionally involved in indole alkaloids and flavonoids biosynthesis, as well as in terpenoid biosynthesis. In this work, many differentially expressed CYP71Ds were found, including CYP71D10, CYP71D11, CYP71D12, CYP71D15, CYP71D55, CYP71D9, and CYP71D95, which were significantly different (Supplementary Table 9). The above results indicated that these genes might be candidate genes involved in tanshinone and salvianolic acid biosynthesis.
Transcriptome analysis showed that the tanshinone synthesis-related genes SmDXS2, SmHDR1, SmGPPS.SSUII.1, SmCPS1, and SmKSL2 were upregulated in S. castanea at 9.53, 2.56, 4.27, 3.60, and 4.34 times, higher than that in S. miltiorrhiza, respectively (Figure 2A). CYP71D375, CYP76AK1, SmMK, and SmPMK were downregulated in S. castanea at 0.697, 0.705, 0.739, and 0.548 times in S. miltiorrhiza, respectively, compared with S. miltiorrhiza. As shown in Figure 2B, the phenolic acid synthesis-related gene PAL1 was upregulated in S. miltiorrhiza, which was 15.1 times that in S. castanea. The expression of 4CL1 in S. castanea was 4.05 times higher than that in S. miltiorrhiza. Several laccase genes (LAC4) encode proteins that may catalyze the oxidative reaction from rosmarinic acid to salvianolic acid B, and their expression was 2.02 times differ from S. miltiorrhiza. The difference in gene expression has revealed the mechanism of high accumulation of tanshinone and rosmarinic acid and low accumulation of salvianolic acid B in S. castanea.
Figure 2. Gene and protein expression in S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea. (A) Gene expression heatmap for the tanshinone pathways. (B) Gene expression heatmap for the salvianolic acid pathways, displaying relative expression levels at the transcriptome (T) and proteome (P) levels. The expression level means Z-score of log2FC (S. castanea/S. miltiorrhiza) of transcriptome and quant ratio of the proteome (S. castanea/S. miltiorrhiza). Source data underlying this Figure are provided in Supplementary Tables 16, 17.
Proteome Properties Revealed the Differential Expression Mechanisms of Salvia miltiorrhiza and Salvia castanea
Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification analysis was carried on S. castanea and S. miltiorrhiza. A total of 812 differentially expressed proteins were identified, 348 of which were upregulated in S. castanea, and 469 of which were upregulated in S. miltiorrhiza (Supplementary Table 10). These differentially expressed proteins were enriched in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, glutathione metabolism, and steroid synthesis (Supplementary Figure 8). Further analysis showed that 5 sequences were related to jasmonic acid signaling (Supplementary Table 11), 14 sequences were related to abscisic acid response genes (Supplementary Table 12), and 9 sequences were related to fungal response genes (Supplementary Table 13). CYP450s and 2OGDs are involved in the downstream step of tanshinone biosynthesis, following the hydroxylation of CYP450s (Xu and Song, 2017). Functional analysis revealed that 2OGD5 contributes to miltirone biosynthesis, regulating the oxidation function after the hydroxylation of CYP450s in miltirone, cryptotanshinone, and tanshinone IIA biosynthesis (Kawai et al., 2014). After combined transcriptome and proteome analysis, 58 2OGDs were identified in S. castanea and S. miltiorrhiza (Supplementary Table 15), of which five 2OGDs were significantly differentially expressed, indicating that 2OGDs participated in flavonol synthase and regulated the accumulation of tanshinone and salvianolic acid.
Proteomic analysis showed that 45 CYP450 proteins (Supplementary Table 14) and 12 proteins were significantly differentially expressed in S. castanea and S. miltiorrhiza. These genes included SmPMK, SmMK, SmHDR1, SmCPS1, CYP71D375, and CYP76AK1, which were 0.548, 0.739, 1.259, 1.53, 0.697, and 0.705 times different in S. miltiorrhiza, respectively (Supplementary Table 16). The expression level of SmC4H1 in S. miltiorrhiza was higher at 0.83 times that of S. castanea. SmC4H may be related to the accumulation of salvianolic acid B in S. castanea (Supplementary Table 17).
To illustrate the differential mechanism of secondary metabolism between S. castanea and S. miltiorrhiza, we analyzed the expression of tanshinone and salvianolic acid biosynthesis-related genes at the transcriptional and proteomic levels. The results showed that 296 genes in S. castanea were upregulated at both the transcriptional and proteomic levels, while 125 genes in S. miltiorrhiza were significantly upregulated at both the transcriptional and protein levels. Further study revealed that the tanshinone synthesis-related genes SmHDR1 (comp19443_c0) and SmCPS1 (comp22134_c0) in S. castanea expressed 2.23- and 1.26-fold higher transcriptional and proteomic levels, respectively. SmCPS1 expressed 3.61 and 1.53 times at transcriptional and proteomic levels as S. miltiorrhiza (Figure 2). Six differential CYP450 sequences were obtained through the combined analysis of the transcriptome and proteome. For instance, the expression levels of CYP76AK1 in S. miltiorrhiza were both high at the transcriptional level and proteomic level, but CYP71D411 catalyzed upstream hydroxylation at C20, and was 0.697 times downregulated in S. castanea.
Differentially expressed genes may be an important reason for the high accumulation of tanshinone in S. castanea. Among the above differentially expressed genes, we performed RT-qPCR analysis. The expression levels of four MYB genes such as SmMYB42, SmMYB34, SmMYB107, and SmMYB85 were higher in S. castanea, which were 2.45, 4.24, 5.95, and 114.90 times higher than that in S. miltiorrhiza, respectively (Wang, 2019). The expression of SmbHLH77 in S. castanea is 155.41 times higher than that in S. miltiorrhiza (Wang, 2019). At the same time, we also determined the expression of WRKYs by RT-qPCR. Among them, SmWRKY17 was down expressed in S. castanea, and SmWRKY38 was 5.7 times higher than S. miltiorrhiza. SmWRKY61 was expressed 5,000 times more higher (Figure 3) in S. castanea, indicating that SmWRKY61 was probably an important regulatory factor for high tanshinone accumulation in S. castanea. Moreover, SmWRKY61 was highly expressed in the stem, and methyl jasmonate (MJ) can upregulate the expression of SmWRKY61, indicating that SmWRKY61 participated in regulating tanshinone synthesis in S. castanea. Therefore, we infer that SmWRKY61 is a potential important factor regulating the accumulation of tanshinone in S. castanea.
Figure 3. Relative expression level of WRKYs in S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea. (A) RT-QPCR levels of WRKY transcription factors in hairy roots of S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea. (B) Expression level of WRKY (S. castanea/S. miltiorrhiza) in S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea transcriptomes. “*” represents 0.01 < P < 0.05, “**” represents P < 0.01, “***” represents P < 0.001.
Overexpression of SmWRKY61 Can Promote Tanshinone Accumulation and Upregulate the Downstream Tanshinone Pathway Genes
To reveal the role of SmWRKY61 on tanshinone biosynthesis, we cloned and obtained the full-length sequence of SmWRKY61, and obtained SmWRKY61 transgenic hairy root lines by overexpression. The leaves of the plants were infected with Agrobacterium rhizogenes ATCC15834, and the hairy roots were sampled after sterilization. The plant expression vector PK7WG2R was used to construct the overexpression vector by gateway technology to explore the function of the gene. PCR results showed that all the overexpressed strains were correctly inserted into the target gene (Supplementary Figure 5). In the SmWRKY61-overexpression hairy roots (OSMWRKY61), the weight of the hairy roots significantly increased at regular intervals (Supplementary Figures 6, 7). To analyze the role of SmWRKY61 in secondary metabolism, the contents of three kinds of tanshinones (tanshinone I, cryptotanshinone, and tanshinone IIA) and three kinds of salvianolic acids (rosmarinic acid, caffeic acid, and salvianolic acid B) were analyzed by HPLC. The overexpression of SmWRKY61 significantly promoted the accumulation of rosmarinic acid, tanshinone I, and tanshinone IIA, while cryptotanshinone was decreased (Figure 4A). Compared with the control, the rosmarinic acid in the OSMWRKY61-6 lines was increased by 3.33 times (control 1.13 mg.g–1,DW), the content of tanshinone IIA in the OSMWRKY61-4 lines was increased by 33.37 times (control 0.01 mg.g–1, DW), and the content of tanshinone I in the OSMWRKY61-7 lines was increased by 11.09 times (control 0.05 mg.g–1, DW). However, the contents of caffeic acid and salvianolic acid B were not significantly different. These results indicated that SmWRKY61 significantly regulated the biosynthesis of tanshinone and rosmarinic acid. However, it seems that SmWRKY61 was not involved in the biosynthesis of caffeic acid or salvianolic acid B.
Figure 4. Tanshinones and polyphenolic compounds contents of hairy roots in S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea. (A) HPLC analyse of tanshinones (cryptotanshinone, tanshinone IIA, and tanshinone I) in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots. (B) HPLC analyse of phenolic acids (caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid, and salvianolic acid). “CK” represent S. miltiorrhiza, “*” represents 0.01 < P < 0.05, “**” represents P < 0.01, “***” represents p < 0.001. All data are the means of three replicates; error bars represent the indicate SD.
Gene expression involving the tanshinone and salvianolic acid biosynthesis was analyzed through qRT-PCR (Figure 5). OSMWRKY61-6 and OSMWRKY61-7 were selected for gene expression analysis, and the quantitative results were plotted as log2. Figure 4 showed that both the salvianolic acid and tanshinone biosynthetic pathways could be regulated by SmWRKY61. Expression levels of genes in the downstream pathway of tanshinone biosynthesis were more significantly upregulated. For the phenolic acid biosynthesis, SmWRKY61 mainly promoted the expression of 4Cl3, TAT1, and CYP98A14 in the downstream pathway. Compared to the control, the expression of 4Cl3 in the two overexpressed lines was increased by 23.7- and 73.6-fold, respectively. TAT1 was increased by 3.1- and 5.8-fold, respectively and CYP98A14 was increased by 3.8- and 11.3-fold, respectively.
Figure 5. Genes expression in the biosynthesis of tanshinone and salvianolic acid in the S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots. (A) Gene expression of tanshinones biosynthesis in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots. (B) Gene expression of phenolic acids biosynthesis in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots. “CK” means the control group. The data were standardized, and the hierarchical clustering method was complete in R pheatmap.
The expression of key enzymes in the tanshinone metabolic pathway was significantly affected, including DXS2, DXR, CMK, HDR, and HDR3 in the MEP pathway and AACT1, HMGS, and HMGS2 in the MVA pathway. The expression of the downstream genes IDI1, IDI3, CPS, CPS3, KSL, KSL2, CYP76AH1, and CYP76AK3 were upregulated. Among them, the expression levels of DXS2, CMK, HMGS2, CPS, KSL, KSL2, CYP76AH1, and CYP76AK3 in OWRKY61-6 were 12.9, 13.3, 22.3, 17.2, 12.1, 12.4, and 59.0 times higher than that in the control, respectively.
As a result, SmWRKY61 had a strong regulatory effect on tanshinone accumulation. SmWRKY61 mainly promoted tanshinone accumulation by regulating the MEP pathway, especially the expression of related genes in the downstream pathway. Our study also found that SmWRK61 significantly upregulated the expression of the DXS2, CPS1, and CYP76AH1 genes, whereas expression of the CPS1 and HDR1 genes in S. castanea were significantly upregulated. These results indicated that the high expression of SmWRK61 was probably the main reason for the accumulation of high levels of tanshinone in S. castanea.
A More Specific Extension of WRKY Gene Family in Salvia Genus
To further reveal the regulatory effect of SmWRKY61 on tanshinone accumulation, we identified the WRKY family in S. miltiorrhiza. A total of 79 candidate SmWRKY genes corresponding to the PF03106 were identified (Supplementary Table 18). Our phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Figure 2) revealed that the SmWRKYs could be classified into three groups. SmWRKY61 mainly belonged to WRKY family III, whose conserved motif was WRKYGQK, and the domain pattern was C-X5C-X22-HXC (Supplementary Figure 3A). The full length of SmWRKY61 was 507 bp, encoding a 19.15 kD protein with an isoelectric point of 8.774. The secondary and tertiary structures are shown in Supplementary Figure 3B. Figure 6A showed that the SmWRKY were in homogeneously distributed on the 8 S. miltiorrhiza chromosomes. The segmental duplications play an important role in evolution, in which multiple genes through polyploidy were followed by chromosome rearrangements. Forty-eight SmWRKY genes were clustered into 30 segmental duplication event regions (Supplementary Table 19). However, SmWRKY61 did not appear to be collinear with other members of the WRKY family.
Figure 6. Collinearity analysis of SmWRKYs. (A) Collinearity analysis and chromosomes distribution of SmWRKYs in the S. miltiorrhiza genome. The gray lines mean all synteny blocks in the S. miltiorrhiza genome, and the red lines mean duplicated WRKY pairs in the S. miltiorrhiza genome. (B) Syntenic analysis of the WRKY61 cluster by comparison to S. indicum, S. miltiorrhiza, S. bowlevana, S. splendens, and S. baicalensis.
The cluster of SmWRKY61 had no homologs in S. barcalensis (Figure 6B), whereas three genes were orthologous to the two upstream and one downstream gene from S. miltiorrhiza, but no WRKY family members were present in this region. Moreover, the ortholog in Sesamum indicum (SiWRKY30) exhibited a more ancestral domain structure, which suggested that the domain mutation event may have occurred. Saspl_022277 seemed to correlate with the SmWRKY61 cluster in S. splendens. S. bowlevana also had collinear blocks with S. miltiorrhiza, and SbWRKY61 had the highest homology with SmWRKY61. In conclusion, our collinearity results indicated a more specific extension of WRKY gene family in Salvia genus.
Expression of WRKY61 and Tanshinone Accumulation in Salvia L.
The expression of SmWRKY61 was particularly high in S. castanea at both transcriptome level and qRT-PCR results. To further reveal the role of WRKY61 in tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia L., we analyzed WRKY61 gene expression and tanshinone contents in transcriptomics of 55 Salvia L. worldwide, including East Asia (EA), Europe, and North America. The WRKY61 sequence was detected only in EA Salvia L. The WRKY61 was discovered in 37 representative species from 55 Salvia L. species (Figure 7A). The N-terminals of the WRKY domain contains seven landmark amino acid domains WRKYGQK (Figure 7C Motif 5), whereas WKRE mutation (Figure 7C Motif 9) and WKRK mutation (Figure 7C Motif 15) presented in the Salvia L. WKRE mutant domain appears in most Salvia L., except in the WKRK mutant domain branch. WRKY61 was upregulated in S_digitaloides_S1173, S_castanea_S1169, S_yunnanensis_S1151, S_bowleyana_S0603, S_aerea_S1170, and S_daiguii_S0297, which indicates a highly analogical expression pattern of tanshinones. An aBSREL test found evidence of episodic diversifying selection on 2 out of 56 branches in the phylogeny. The fast unconstrained bayesian approximation test (FUBAR) (Murrell et al., 2013) indicated evidence of episodic positive/diversifying selection at 21 sites in 37 WRKY61s, with a posterior probability of 0.9 (Supplementary Table 23). Therefore, the above results indicated that an intense positive selection of WRKY61 may take place in the evolutionary process of Salvia L.
Figure 7. Phylogenetic relationships of conserved protein motifs in WRKY genes in Salvia L. (A) The genetic relationship of the phylogenetic tree constructed by Bayesian Inference (BI) method of WRKY61 homologs in Salvia L. (Clades I–III). Numbers on the branches indicate statistical support values [numbers on left: maximum likelihood bootstrap proportion (ML-BP), numbers on right: Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP)]. (B) Heatmap of HPLC in Salvia L. dihydrotanshinone (DI), cryptotanshinone (CT), tanshinone I (TI), and tanshinone IIA (IIA). (C) The motif composition of S. miltiorrhiza WRKY proteins. The length of protein can be estimated using the scale at the bottom.
A phylogenetic tree of WRKY61 sequences from 37 representative species in 55 Salvia L. species (Supplementary Table 20) was constructed by Bayesian Inference (BI) performed by Mrbayes (Figure 7A). The results of the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis were largely consistent with the BI analysis. The phylogenetic relationships (Figure 7A) showed that saspl_022277 and SiWRKY30, which had high homology with SmWRKY61, clustered with AtWRKY41, AtWRKY53, and AtWRKY55. Within Salvia L., the three putative WRKY61 gene groups (Clades I–III) were not distinguishable. In detail, Clade I comprised nine Salvia L. species (S. glutinose to S. flava), whereas Clade II included S. hylocharis to S. liguliloba. Clade III covered S_substolonifera_S477 above, which together formed a likely sister group with clade II. The Clades I taxa belong to Perennes of subg. Salvia sensu (distributed in Lijiang, Yunnan, China), which was characterized by a Sino-Himalayan distribution pattern and tanshinone accumulation in the taxa. Particularly the expression level of WRKY61 was also high in Clade I. WRKY61 was first developed in S_glutinosa_S1031, but the expression of WRKY61 in S_glutinosa_S1031 was downregulated. Taxa in clade I species: S_digitaloides_S1173 (0.154 mg/g DW), S_castanea_S1169 (0.287 mg/g DW), S_przewalskii_S1161 (0.864 mg/g DW), and S_aerea_S1170 (0.209 mg/g DW) showed high tanshinone accumulation and high WRKY61 expression (Figure 7B). Six WRKY61s were detected in Clade II, belonging to S. chinensis group, which was placed in subg. Allagospadonopsis. In this clade, S_trijuga_S1164 had the highest total tanshinone content in Salvia L.; subsequently, S_prionitis_S1097 had a total tanshinone content of 0.1895 mg/g (Figure 7B). However, no tanshinone was found in the other species in clade II. Phylogenetic and metabolomics evidence indicated that S. trijuga were members of subclade Substoloniferae, but the phylogenetic tree of WRKY61 was placed in subg. Allagospadonopsis. Clade III contained 17 species in Salvia, which differed from the evolutionary relationships determined for Salvia L. In S_nanchuanensis_S0517 (Salvia nanchuanensis Sun var. pteridifolia), seven landmark domains WRKYGQK were replaced by WKRE mutations, which may have resulted in low expression of WRKY61 and undetectable tanshinone content. Within the Salvia miltiorrhiza group, S. meiliensis and S. honania were two unique species that contain similar contents of tanshinone and WRKY61 to S. miltiorrhiza and S. kiangsiensis.
Discussion
Tanshinone has various pharmacological effects including cardioprotective (Wei et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2018), neuroprotective (Liu et al., 2010), antioxidant (Wang et al., 2013), anticancer (Chen et al., 2013), diabetic treatment (Lin et al., 2013), and other pharmacological effects. As far as we know, tanshinone was widely distributed in Salvia species (Wu et al., 2016). However, the biosynthesis and regulation mechanism of tanshinone in those species were largely unknown. In this work, the distribution pattern and accumulation of tanshinones in the roots of 37 Salvia species were analyzed by HPLC. We found that tanshinones were widely distributed in the roots of Salvia species from southwestern China such as S. przewalskii, S. trijuga, and S. castanea. Content of dihydrotanshinone I in S. miltiorrhiza roots was the highest, as high as 0.065% (Figure 1). The tanshinone IIA content of S. miltiorrhiza was only 0.2% (Figure 1). However, the content of tanshinone IIA in S. castanea was as high as 1.62% (Yang et al., 2012). To address the underlying reason for this difference, we performed comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea. It was found that the key genes of tanshinone biosynthesis were upregulated in S. castanea. These results were consistent with our previous report (Fang et al., 2018). It suggested that the high expression of those key genes might be responsible for the high accumulation of tanshinones S. castanea. However, the underlying reasons causing the high expression of those key genes were still unclear.
A large number of studies have shown that transcription factors are important regulatory factors of plant secondary metabolism. Transcription factors can promote the accumulation of secondary metabolites by inducing expressions of multiple genes involved in biosynthetic pathways. With the development of third-generation sequencing technology, more than 1,300 TFs have been detected in S. miltiorrhiza, including WKRYs, bHLHs, MYBs and so on. Moreover, several TFs which can regulate tanshinone biosynthesis have been widely reported (Ding et al., 2017; Xing et al., 2018b; Zhang et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2021). WRKY was another important transcription factor family involved in terpenoid biosynthesis. In S. miltiorrhiza, overexpression of SmWRKY1 and SmWRKY2 significantly increased the accumulation of tanshinone (Cao et al., 2018; Deng et al., 2019). In this work, we found dozens of differential expressed transcription factors like MYBs, bHLHs, and WRKYs. In these differentially expressed TFs, SmWRKY61 expression was particularly high in S. castanea, and was 5,564 times more than that in S. miltiorrhiza. It was indicated that WRKY61 was probably an important regulator for high tanshinone accumulation in S. castanea. So far, the roles of MYB and bHLH have been comprehensively reported in Salvia miltiorrhiza, but there are few reports on WRKY transcription factors. Therefore, we originally cloned a novel WRKY transcription factor SmWRKY61 from S. miltiorrhiza. Overexpression of SmWRKY61 in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots can significantly enhance tanshinone accumulation. Contents of tanshinone IIA and tanshinone I in transgenic lines were 33.37 and 10.09 times higher than that in the control lines. Moreover, the promoting effect of SmWRKY61 on tanshinone accumulation was significantly higher than that of other reported transcription factors, such as SmMYB36 (Ding et al., 2017), SmWRKY1 (Cao et al., 2018), SmWRKY2 (Deng et al., 2019), SmbHLH10 (Xing et al., 2018a), and SmERF1L1 (Huang et al., 2019).
Perhaps more interestingly, we conducted a blast on NCBI with WRKY61 and no homologous genes were found. AtWRKY41, AtWRKY53, and AtWRKY55 had high homology with SiWRKY30. It was indicated that WRKY61 had a unique structure in Salvia L. Collinearity analysis revealed that S. barcalensis did not have orthologs with SmWRKY61. However, the SmWRKY61 ortholog in Sesamum indicum (SiWRKY30) exhibited the more ancestral and conservative WRKY domain structure. The collinearity analysis indicated a more specific origin of WRKY61 in Salvia L. Within Salvia L., WRKY61 genes were found in only 37 species of 55 Salvia L., and were only detected in EA Salvia L. FUBAR and aBSREL test found evidence of intense positive selection of WRKY61, which might take place in the evolutionary process of Salvia L. In particular, seven landmark domains WRKYGQK were replaced with WKRE mutation. It probably resulted in low expression of WRKY61 and undetectable tanshinone content.
In conclusion, our study illustrated that SmWRKY61 was a highly effective regulator of tanshinone accumulation and may be a key factor leading to high tanshinone accumulation in S. castanea. More specifically, the more specific WRKY61 origin and evolutionary derivation of medically relevant tanshinones. Accordingly, our results provide insight into the contents of terpenoid differences and are more widely distributed in Salvia L.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials
Salvia miltiorrhiza and Salvia castanea were planted in the greenhouse of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China). After growing for a year, the root of the plant was taken as a sample for transcriptomes and proteomes. The samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a −80°C freezer for future use. For the overexpression experiment, the aseptic leaves were infected with Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain ATCC 15834 to obtain S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots. The hairy roots were cultivated in 100-mL Erlenmeyer flasks, which contained 50 mL of 6, 7-V liquid medium (with 30 g l–1 sucrose). Adjusting the pH to 5.8, 0.2 g of fresh hairy roots were inoculated in each Erlenmeyer flask containing medium. Labeled samples were put in an orbital shaker (110 rpm) and incubated lucifugous at 25°C. After 24 days, to keep the roots at −80°C, our samples were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen. Portions of the samples were subsequently used to extract RNA and protein. All interaction experiments had three biological replicates.
mRNA Library Construction and Sequencing
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, United States) following the manufacturer’s procedure using the root of annual plant S. miltiorrhiza and S. castanea roots. The total RNA quantity and purity were analyzed of Bioanalyzer 2100 and RNA 6000 Nano LaChhip Kit (Agilent, CA, United States) with RIN number >7.0. Approximately 10 μg of total RNA, representing a specific adipose type, was subjected to isolate poly (A) mRNA with poly-T oligo attached magnetic beads (Invitrogen). Following purification, the mRNA is fragmented into small pieces using divalent cations under elevated temperatures. Then the cleaved RNA fragments were reverse-transcribed to create the final cDNA library in accordance with the protocol for the mRNA-Seq sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States), the average insert size for the paired-end libraries was 300 bp (±50 bp). Then we performed the paired-end sequencing on an Illumina Hiseq2000 at the (LC Sciences, United States) following the vendor’s recommended protocol. A more detailed protocol of quality control, mapping, and sequence annotation methods can be found in Supplementary Method 1.1.
Expression Profiling and Different Expression
To investigate the expression level of each unigene in different samples, all PE reads for each sample were aligned back to the final assembly by using perl scripts in Trinity under default parameters option. The alignment produced a digital expression level for each contig, and then these were normalized by RESM-based algorithm by using perl scripts in Trinity package to get RPKM values. Based on the expression levels, the significant differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) among different samples were identified with a p value < 0.05. The cluster of the DETs was performed by using the common perl and R scripts.
Gene Family Collinearity and Chromosomal Distribution
The position of SmWRKYs on the chromosomes of S. miltiorrhiza was visualized by http://mg2c.iask.in/mg2c_v2.0/ (Chao et al., 2015; Supplementary Figure 4). All SmWRKYs were mapped to S. miltiorrhiza chromosomes based on physical location information from the S. miltiorrhiza genome using Circos (Krzywinski et al., 2009). MCScanX (Wang et al., 2012) was applied to analyze the WRKY gene collinearity, synteny, and duplication events. Whole-genome sequencing data of S. miltiorrhiza (PRJCA003150), Salvia bowleyana (PRJCA003734), S. baicalensis (PRJCA003374), S. splendens (GCA_004379255.1), and S. indicum (GCA_001692995.1) were downloaded from the Genome Warehouse of the National Genomics Data Center. A more detailed gene family identification and sequence analysis method can be found in Supplementary Method 1.2.
WRKY61 Gene Identification and Sequence Analysis in Salvia L.
WRKY61 gene in Salvia L. S_cavaleriei_S0123, S_daiguii_S0297, S_liguliloba_S0747, S_chienii_S1094, S_prionitis_S1097, S_chinensis_S0171, S_hylocharis_S1155, S_flava_S1153, S_cyclostegia_S1171, S_przewalskii_S1161, S_aerea_S1170, S_digitaloides_S1173, S_mekongensis_S1167, S_castanea_S1169, S_nipponica_S0742, S_glutinosa_S1031, S_grandifolia_S0804, S_splendens_S1062, S_substolonifera_S0477, S_adiantifolia _S0671, S_cavaleriei_S0761, S_filicifolia_S0940, S_cava leriei_S0994, S_nanchuanensis_S0484, S_yunnanensis_S1151, S_nanchuanensis_S0517, S_miltiorrhiza_S0146, S_miltiorrhiza_ S0365, S_sinica_S0175, S_plectranthoides_S0460, S_paramil tiorrhiza_S0491, S_meiliensis_S0271, S_honania_S0356, S_kiangsiensis_S1127, S_trijuga_S1164, S_coccinea_S0318, S_adenophora_S1068 were obtained from transcriptome, which is listed in Supplementary Table 20. AtWRKY41, AtWRKY53, and AtWRKY55 were selected as an outgroup. A phylogeny etic tree was constructed based on nucleotide sequence multiple alignments used MAFFT (Katoh and Standley, 2013) and IQTREE2 (Nguyen et al., 2015) with the JTT + G4 model 5,000 replicates bootstrap. Mrbayes version 3.1.2 (Fredrik and John, 2003) was adopted to analyze Bayesian inference (BI) with the GTR + G model, where model was selected by jmodeltest (Posada, 2008) under the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The convergence of the analyses was validated by the standard deviation of split frequencies (<0.01). The first 25% of generations were discarded as burn-in. A 50% majority-rule consensus tree was constructed from the remaining trees to estimate posterior probabilities (PPs) of nodal support. Diversifying selections were formally tested at the 56 branches at http://datamonkey.org/ (Weaver et al., 2018) using aBSREL test (Smith et al., 2015; Supplementary Table 22). Fast unconstrained Bayesian approximation test (FUBAR) (Murrell et al., 2013) found evidence of episodic positive/diversifying selection at 21 sites and episodic negative/purifying selection at 1 site with a posterior probability of 0.9 (Supplementary Table 23).
Protein Extraction
The samples were ground to a powder in liquid nitrogen, extracted with lysis buffer containing 1 mM PMSF and 2 mM EDTA (final concentration). Then 10 mM DTT (final concentration) was added, and the samples were sonicated at 200 W for 15 min and then centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min. The supernatant was mixed well with acetone containing 10% (v/v) TCA and incubated at −20°C overnight. After centrifugation at 4°C, 30,000 g, the supernatant was discarded. The precipitate was washed with chilled acetone three times. The pellet was air-dried and dissolved in lysis buffer. The suspension was sonicated at 200 W for 15 min and centrifuged at 4°C, 30,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was transferred to another tube. To reduce disulfide bonds in proteins of the supernatant, 10 mM DTT (final concentration) was added and incubated at 56°C for 1 h. Subsequently, 55 mM IAM (final concentration) was added to block the cysteines and incubated for 1 h in the darkroom. The supernatant was mixed well with 5 volumes of chilled acetone for 2 h at −20°C to precipitate proteins. After centrifugation at 4°C and 30,000 g, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was air-dried for 5 min, dissolved in TEAB (Applied Biosystems, Milan, Italy), and sonicated at 200 W for 15 min. Finally, samples were centrifuged at 4°C, 30,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and quantified. The proteins in the supernatant were kept at −80°C for further analysis.
Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantification Labeling and SCX Fractionation
Total protein (100 g) was taken out of each sample solution and then the protein was digested with trypsin Gold (Promega, Madison, WI, United States) with the ratio of protein: trypsin = 30:1 at 37°C for 16 h. After trypsin digestion, peptides were dried by vacuum centrifugation. Peptides were reconstituted in 0.5M TEAB and processed according to the manufacturer’s protocol for 8-plex iTRAQ reagent (Applied Biosystems). Briefly, one unit of iTRAQ reagent was thawed and reconstituted in 24 μl isopropanol. Samples were labeled with the iTRAQ tags as follows: Sample S. miltiorrhiza, Sample S. castanea. The peptides were labeled with the isobaric tags, incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The labeled peptide mixtures were then pooled and dried by vacuum centrifugation. SCX chromatography was performed with a LC-20AB HPLC Pump system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The iTRAQ-labeled peptide mixtures were reconstituted with 4 mL buffer A (25 mM NaH2PO4 in 25% ACN, pH 2.7) and loaded onto a 4.6 × 250 mm Ultremex SCX column containing 5-μm particles (Phenomenex). The peptides were eluted at a flow rate of 1 mL/min with a gradient of buffer A for 10 min, 5–60% buffer B for 27 min, 60–100% buffer B for 1 min. The system was then maintained at 100% buffer B for 1 min before equilibrating with buffer A for 10 min prior to the next injection. Elution was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 214 nm, and fractions were collected every 1 min. The eluted peptides were pooled into 20 fractions, desalted with a Strata X C18 column (Phenomenex), and vacuum dried.
LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis
Each fraction was resuspended in buffer A (5% ACN, 0.1%FA) and centrifuged at 20,000g for 10 min, the final concentration of peptide was about 0.5 g/l on average. A total of 10l supernatants were loaded on a LC-20AD nano HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) by the autosampler onto a 2-cm C18 trap column. Then, the peptides were eluted onto a 10-cm analytical C18 column (inner diameter 75 m) packed in-house. The samples were loaded at 8 L/min for 4 min, then the 35 min gradient was run at 300 nl/min starting from 2 to 35% B (95%ACN, 0.1%FA), followed by 5 min linear gradient to 60%, then followed by 2 min linear gradient to 80%, maintained at 80% B for 4 min, and finally returned to 5% in 1 min. Data acquisition was performed with a TripleTOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) fitted with a Nanospray III source (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) and a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, Woburn, MA, United States). Data were acquired using an ion spray voltage of 2.5 kV, curtain gas of 30 psi, nebulizer gas of 15 psi, and an interface heater temperature of 150. The MS was operated with a RP of greater than or equal to 30 000 FWHM for TOF MS scans. For IDA, survey scans were acquired in 250 ms and as many as 30 product ion scans were collected if exceeding a threshold of 120 counts per second (counts/s) and with a 2+ to 5+ charge-state. The total cycle time was fixed to 3.3 s. Q2 transmission window was 100 Da for 100%. Four times bins were summed for each scan at a pulser frequency value of 11 kHz through monitoring of the 40 GHz multichannel TDC detector with four-anode channel detection. A sweeping collision energy setting of 35 ± 5 eV coupled with iTRAQ adjust rolling collision energy was applied to all precursor ions for collision-induced dissociation. Dynamic exclusion was set for 1/2 of peak width (15 s), and then the precursor was refreshed off the exclusion list. A more detailed data analysis method can be found in Supplementary Method 1.3.
WRKY Identification and Functional Validation Experiments
SmWRKY61 (KM823184.1) protein sequences were downloaded from Genbank. The CDS of SmWRKY61 was amplified and cloned (Supplementary Figures 4A,B) into the restriction site attP of the pDONR207 vector. The overexpression vector was constructed by Gateway method. A DNA fragment with attB-flanked was subjected to a BP recombination reaction with an attP-containing donor vector to generate an entry clone (Supplementary Figure 6C and Supplementary Table 25). The entry clone attL-containing is subjected to LR recombination reaction with the target vector attR-containing to generate an expression clone into the pK7WG2R vector (Supplementary Figure 5D and Supplementary Table 26). The contain recombinant plasmid SmWRKY61 was transformed into A. rhizogenes (ATCC15834) (Supplementary Figure 5E). The rolB, rolC, HPT, and SmWRKY61 specific primers were used to identify positive transgenic lines. Our transgenic lines were used for RNA extraction, and they were regularly subcultured (every 30 days) (Supplementary Figure 6). All the above primers are listed in Supplementary Table 24.
GoTaq-qPCR Master Mix kit (Promega, China) was used to perform qRT-PCR assay on an Applied Biosystems StepOne Real-time PCR System (United States) with Actin gene as the internal control, where the primers are listed in Supplementary Table 27. The comparative Ct method was performed to quantify gene expression levels in three biological replicates.
HPLC Analysis to Measure the Phenolic Acid and Tanshinone Contents
Fresh hairy roots were harvested and dried and then ground to a powder. A total of 200 mg fresh samples were extracted with 16 mL of methanol/dichloromethane (3:1, v/v). Then the samples were sonicated for 1 h and centrifuged at 25°C. The Waters E2695 binary high-performance liquid chromatograph was used for content determination, and the detector was Waters 2996 diode array detector. Waters Sunfire C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) was used for chromatographic analysis. Data collection software Empower 3 was used for data collection. The chromatographic conditions were as follows: flow rate of 1 mL/min, column temperature of 30°C, sample loading volume of 10 l. The absorbance was at 270 nm (tanshinone) and 288 nm (phenolic acid), respectively, and the mobile phases were 0.026% phosphoric acid aqueous solution and acetonitrile, respectively, with gradient elution. By plotting the peak area (y) of the analyte and the corresponding concentration (x, mg mL–1), the linear relationship of each standard curve was determined. The regression equation and correlation coefficient are [y = 3,724,065.1501x–86,580.8597] (R2 = 0.9999) for tanshinone I, [y = 5,524,625.7662x + 78,811.1024] (R2 = 0.9988) for cryptotanshinone, [y = 2,660,430.0088x + 22,146.7859] (R2 = 0.9997) for dihydrotanshinone I and [y = 5,128,785.8762x–58,317.4739] (R2 = 0.9994) for tanshinone IIA. [y = 5472992.9477X−3794.4223] (R2 = 1) for caffeic acid, [y = 1939973.1010X + 239.4423] (R2 = 0.9999) for rosmarinic acid and [y = 960469X-63957] (R2 = 0.9999) for salvianolic acids B. The CAS of standards for quantification by HPLC was listed in Supplementary Table 28.
Quantitative Real-Time-PCR
A total of 1 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed for first-strand cDNA synthesis using the Prime Script™ RT reagent Kit (Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reactions were performed with the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix in Applied Biosystems by Life Technologies (QuantStudio 6 Flex, ABI, Waltham, MA, United States). Actin was used as the standard to normalize the content of cDNA. Ten microliters of the reaction mixture was added to each well. The thermal cycling program was set at 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 95°C for 5 s, and 59°C for 30s. Relative quantification of gene expression levels was dealt with the comparative CT method (2–ΔΔCT). Adhering to minimal MIQE guidelines, RT-qPCR was carried out using SmActin gene as reference gene, primer as previously reported (Zhang et al., 2020). The real-time PCR was conducted with three replicates for each sample, and data are indicated as means ± standard error (SE) (n = 3).
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.
Author Contributions
ZL, LH, DY, and YWa conceived and organized the experiments. YuC and YWe performed the experiments. YuC, YiC, ZD, ZW, ZQ, and MD performed the bioinformatics analysis. DY, ZL, YH, JG, JY, and XZ contributed to the data analysis. YuC and DY wrote the manuscript. All the authors discussed and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LR21H280002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973415 and 81673535), and Key project at central government level: The ability establishment of sustainable use for valuable Chinese medicine resources (2060302), Specific Project for Strategic Biological Resources and Technology Supporting System from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZSZY-001).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics and Resources for their continuous research support. We sincerely thank National Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica for their guidance for this article.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.820582/full#supplementary-material
References
Bailey, T. L., Boden, M., Buske, F. A., Frith, M., Grant, C. E., Clementi, L., et al. (2009). MEME Suite: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 202–208. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335
Cao, W., Wang, Y., Shi, M., Hao, X., Zhao, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2018). Transcription factor SmWRKY1 positively promotes the biosynthesis of tanshinones in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Front. Plant Sci. 9:554. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00554
Chao, J., Kong, Y., Wang, Q., Sun, Y., Gong, D., Lv, J., et al. (2015). MapGene2Chrom, a tool to draw gene physical map based on Perl and SVG languages. Hereditas 37, 91–97. doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.2015.01.013
Chen, W., Lu, Y., Chen, G., and Huang, S. (2013). Molecular evidence of cryptotanshinone for treatment and prevention of human cancer. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 13, 979–987. doi: 10.2174/18715206113139990115
Cole, T., Adam, R., Loyal, G., Geo, P., Daehwan, K., David, R. K., et al. (2012). Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7, 562–578. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016
Deng, C., Hao, X., Shi, M., Fu, R., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). Tanshinone production could be increased by the expression of SmWRKY2 in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Sci. 284, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.03.007
Ding, K., Pei, T., Bai, Z., Jia, Y., Ma, P., and Liang, Z. (2017). SmMYB36, a Novel R2R3-MYB transcription factor, enhances tanshinone accumulation and decreases phenolic acid content in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Sci. Rep. 7:5104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04909-w
Fang, Y., Hou, Z., Zhang, X., Yang, D., and Liang, Z. (2018). Diverse specialized metabolism and their responses to lactalbumin hydrolysate in hairy root cultures of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge and Salvia castanea Diels f. tomentosa Stib. Biochem. Eng. J. 131, 58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2017.12.007
Fredrik, R., and John, P. H. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
Gao, W., Hillwig, M. L., Huang, L., Cui, G., Wang, X., Kong, J., et al. (2009). A functional genomics approach to tanshinone biosynthesis provides stereochemical insights. Org. Lett. 11, 5170–5173. doi: 10.1021/ol902051v
Guo, J., Ma, X., Cai, Y., Ma, Y., Zhan, Z., Zhou, Y. J., et al. (2016). Cytochrome P450 promiscuity leads to a bifurcating biosynthetic pathway for tanshinones. New Phytol. 210, 525–534. doi: 10.1111/nph.13790
Guo, J., Zhou, Y. J., Hillwig, M. L., Shen, Y., Yang, L., Wang, Y., et al. (2013). CYP76AH1 catalyzes turnover of miltiradiene in tanshinones biosynthesis and enables heterologous production of ferruginol in yeasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 12108–12133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218061110
Huang, Q., Meihong, S., Tingpan, Y., Yu, W., Min, S., Sunjie, L., et al. (2019). The AP2/ERF transcription factor SmERF1L1 regulates the biosynthesis of tanshinones and phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Food Chem. 274, 368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.119
Jian, W., Mengdie, Q., JuanShen, G., Ye, S., and Huang, L. Q. (2017). Cloning, subcellular localization, and heterologous expression of ApNAC1 gene from Andrographis paniculata. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 42, 890–895. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20170217.005
Kai, G., Pan, L., Tong, Z., Wei, Z., Jing, W., Hui, H., et al. (2010). Characterization, expression profiling, and functional identification of a gene encoding geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase from Salvia miltiorrhiza. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 15, 236–245. doi: 10.1007/s12257-009-0123-y
Kai, G., Xu, H., Zhou, C., Liao, P., Xiao, J., Luo, X., et al. (2011). Metabolic engineering tanshinone biosynthetic pathway in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy root cultures. Metab. Eng. 13, 319–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.02.003
Katoh, K., and Standley, D. M. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 722–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010
Kawai, Y., Ono, E., and Mizutani, M. (2014). Evolution and diversity of the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase superfamily in plants. Plant J. 2, 328–343. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12479
Kim, D., Pertea, G., Trapnell, C., Pimentel, H., Kelley, R., and Salzberg, S. L. (2013). TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14:R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36
Krzywinski, M., Schein, J., Birol, I., Connors, J., Gascoyne, R., Horsman, D., et al. (2009). Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645. doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109
Li, M., Chen, J., Peng, Y., Wu, Q., and Xiao, P. (2008). Investigation of Danshen and related medicinal plants in China. J. Ethnopharmacol. 120, 419–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.09.013
Lin, T. Y., Lu, C. W., Huang, S. K., and Wang, S. J. (2013). Tanshinone IIA, a constituent of Danshen, inhibits the release of glutamate in rat cerebrocortical nerve terminals. J. Ethnopharmacol. 147, 488–496. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.03.045
Liu, Y., Wang, L., Li, X., Lv, C., Feng, D., and Luo, Z. (2010). Tanshinone IIA improves impaired nerve functions in experimental diabetic rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 399, 49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.037
Ma, Y., Cui, G., Chen, T., Ma, X., Wang, R., Jin, B., et al. (2021). Expansion within the CYP71D subfamily drives the heterocyclization of tanshinones synthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Nat. Commun. 12:685. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20959-1
Ma, Y., Yuan, L., Wu, B., Li, X. E., Chen, S., and Lu, S. (2012). Genome-wide identification and characterization of novel genes involved in terpenoid biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 2809–2823. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err466
Murrell, B., Moola, S., Mabona, A., Weighill, T., Sheward, D., Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., et al. (2013). FUBAR: a Fast, unconstrained bayesian approximation for inferring selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1196–1205. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst030
Newman, J. D., and Chappell, J. (1999). Isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants: carbon partitioning within the cytoplasmic pathway. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34, 95–106. doi: 10.1080/10409239991209228
Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A., and Minh, B. Q. (2015). IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300
Posada, D. (2008). jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1253–1256. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn083
Rohmer, M., Knani, M., Simonin, P., Sutter, B., and Sahm, H. (1993). Isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria: a novel pathway for the early steps leading to isopentenyl diphosphate. Biochem. J. 295, 517–524. doi: 10.1042/bj2950517
Shi, M., Luo, X., Ju, G., Li, L., Huang, S., Zhang, T., et al. (2016). Enhanced diterpene tanshinone accumulation and bioactivity of transgenic Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots by pathway engineering. J. Agric. Food Chem. 64, 2523–2530. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04697
Smith, M. D., Weryheim, J. O., Weaer, S., Murrell, B., Sceffler, K., and Kosakovskypond, S. L. (2015). Less is more: an adaptive branch-site random effects model for efficient detection of episodic diversifying selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5, 1342–1353.
Wang, L., Li, Y., Deng, W., Dong, Z., Li, X., Liu, D., et al. (2018). Cardio-protection of ultrafine granular powder for Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge against myocardial infarction. J. Ethnopharmacol. 222, 99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2018.04.029
Wang, S., Zang, W., Yang, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhao, M., Gao, Z., et al. (2013). Tanshinone IIA and baicalin inhibiting the formation of benzo[a]pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene induced cytotoxicity: correlation with scavenging free radical. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 36, 403–410. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2013.05.003
Wang, Y. T. (2019). Differential expression analysis of transcription factor MYB and bHLH inhairy root of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge and Salvia castanea Diels.ftomentosa Stib. J. Zhejiang Agric. Sci. 9, 1593–1600.
Wang, Y., Tang, H., Debarry, J. D., Tan, X., Li, J., Wang, X., et al. (2012). MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 7:e49. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1293
Weaver, S., Shank, S. D., Spielman, S. J., Li, M., Muse, S. V., and Kosakovsky Pond, S. L. (2018). Datamonkey 2.0: a modern web application for characterizing selective and other evolutionary processes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3, 773–777. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx335
Wei, B., You, M. G., Ling, J. J., Wei, L. L., Wang, K., Li, W. W., et al. (2013). Regulation of antioxidant system, lipids and fatty acid β-oxidation contributes to the cardioprotective effect of sodium tanshinone IIA sulphonate in isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction in rats. Atherosclerosis 230, 148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.07.005
Wu, Y. B., Ni, Z. Y., Shi, Q. W., Dong, M., and Cong, B. (2016). Constituents from Salvia species and their biological activities. Chem. Rev. 11, 5967–6026. doi: 10.1021/cr200058f
Xing, B., Liang, L., Liu, L., Hou, Z., Yang, D., Yan, K., et al. (2018a). Overexpression of SmbHLH148 induced biosynthesis of tanshinones as well as phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Cell Rep. 37, 1681–1692. doi: 10.1007/s00299-018-2339-9
Xing, B., Yang, D., Yu, H., Zhang, B., and Yan, K. (2018b). Overexpression of SmbHLH10 enhances tanshinones biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Sci. 276, 229–238. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.07.016
Xu, Z., and Song, J. (2017). The 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase superfamily participates in tanshinone production in Salvia miltiorrhiza. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 2299–2308. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx113
Xu, Z., Ji, A., Zhang, X., Song, J., and Chen, S. (2016). Biosynthesis and regulation of active compounds in medicinal model plant Salvia miltiorrhiza. Chin. Herbal Med. 8, 3–11. doi: 10.1016/S1674-6384(16)60002-3
Yang, D., Ma, P., Xiao, L., Liang, Z., Zhang, M., Shuang, S., et al. (2012). Metabolic profiles and cDNA-AFLP analysis of Salvia miltiorrhiza and Salvia castanea Diel f. tomentosa Stib. PLoS One 7:e29678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029678
Yang, D., Yang, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Meng, X., and Liang, Z. (2009). Metabolic profiles of three related Salvia species. Fitoterapia 80, 274–278. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2009.03.004
Zhang, C., Xing, B., Yang, D., Ren, M., Guo, H., Yang, S., et al. (2020). SmbHLH3 acts as a transcription repressor for both phenolic acids and tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Phytochemistry 169: 112183.
Zhang, X. (2019). The Functional Study of SmWRKY9 Transcription Factor in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Shanghai: Normal University.
Zhou, W., Shi, M., Deng, C., Lu, S., Huang, F., Wang, Y., et al. (2021). The methyl jasmonate-responsive transcription factor SmMYB1 promotes phenolic acid biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Hortic. Res. 8:10. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00443-5
Keywords: secondary metabolism, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Salvia Linn, proteome, transcriptome, WRKYs
Citation: Chen Y, Wang Y, Guo J, Yang J, Zhang X, Wang Z, Cheng Y, Du Z, Qi Z, Huang Y, Dennis M, Wei Y, Yang D, Huang L and Liang Z (2022) Integrated Transcriptomics and Proteomics to Reveal Regulation Mechanism and Evolution of SmWRKY61 on Tanshinone Biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza and Salvia castanea. Front. Plant Sci. 12:820582. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.820582
Received: 23 November 2021; Accepted: 27 December 2021;
Published: 03 March 2022.
Edited by:
Eirini Sarrou, Hellenic Agricultural Organization–ELGO, GreeceReviewed by:
Wei Gao, Capital Medical University, ChinaShaohua Zeng, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China
Monika Bielecka, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland
Copyright © 2022 Chen, Wang, Guo, Yang, Zhang, Wang, Cheng, Du, Qi, Huang, Dennis, Wei, Yang, Huang and Liang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yukun Wei, eWt3ZWk3NkBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ==; Dongfeng Yang, eWRmODA3QHNpbmEuY29t; Luqi Huang, aHVhbmdsdXFpMDFAMTI2LmNvbQ==; Zongsuo Liang, bGlhbmd6c0Btcy5pc3djLmFjLmNu
†These authors share first authorship