Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci., 17 March 2020
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress

Prospects for the Study and Improvement of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Date Palms in the Post-genomics Era

\r\nKhaled Michel Hazzouri&#x;Khaled Michel Hazzouri1†Jonathan M. Flowers,&#x;Jonathan M. Flowers2,3†David NelsonDavid Nelson2Alain LemansourAlain Lemansour4Khaled Masmoudi*Khaled Masmoudi5*Khaled M. A. Amiri,*Khaled M. A. Amiri1,6*
  • 1Khalifa Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
  • 2Center for Genomics and Systems Biology (CGSB), New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • 3Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY, United States
  • 4Date Palm France Biotechnology, Châteauvieux, France
  • 5College of Food and Agriculture, Department of Integrative Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
  • 6College of Science, Department of Biology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) is a socio-economically important crop in the Middle East and North Africa and a major contributor to food security in arid regions of the world. P. dactylifera is both drought and salt tolerant, but recent water shortages and increases in groundwater and soil salinity have threatened the continued productivity of the crop. Recent studies of date palm have begun to elucidate the physiological mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance and the genes and biochemical pathways that control the response to these stresses. Here we review recent studies on tolerance of date palm to salinity and drought stress, the role of the soil and root microbiomes in abiotic stress tolerance, and highlight recent findings of omic-type studies. We present a perspective on future research of abiotic stress in date palm that includes improving existing genome resources, application of genetic mapping to determine the genetic basis of variation in tolerances among cultivars, and adoption of gene-editing technologies to the study of abiotic stress in date palms. Development of necessary resources and application of the proposed methods will provide a foundation for future breeders and genetic engineers aiming to develop more stress-tolerant cultivars of date palm.

Introduction

Among the greatest challenges currently facing crop productivity worldwide are the salinization of arable land and pressures from various sources of abiotic stress. These challenges are exacerbated in arid and semi-arid regions where climate change and chronic water shortages have reduced arable land area and reduced crop yields. As fresh water resources are depleted, irrigation with brackish water, drought, evaporation and excessive heat in these regions cause large amounts of soluble salt to accumulate in the soil. These conditions, together with other sources of abiotic stress such as heavy metal exposure and nutrient stress, increasingly pose a threat to crop yields and food security.

The date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L., 2n = 36) is a commercially important fruit crop in arid regions of the Middle East and North Africa. Date palms are dioecious and have a long juvenile phase that includes a minimum of 4 years to first flowering and 10 years or more to produce basal offshoots and reach maximum yield capacity (Chao and Krueger, 2007). Like other dioecious fruit crops, cultivation practices utilize vegetative propagation such as transfer of basal offshoots or micropropagation in tissue culture to clone female cultivars. These practices maintain a rich diversity of more than 3,000 named varieties worldwide which are valued primarily for their sweet fleshy fruits (Zaid and de Wet, 2002). Micropropagation has become the primary means of propagating elite cultivars for commercial production in many areas, but bringing new cultivars into tissue culture is difficult and time consuming (Aaouine, 2003; Mazri and Meziani, 2015). Sexual reproduction has also been adopted in some areas, but seedlings are undesirable in most commercial contexts owing to heterogeneity in fruit quality (Johnson et al., 2013).

Date palms inhabit harsh desert environments and remain viable even in areas with saline soils and survive long periods with limited water supply (Nixon, 1951; Wickens, 1998; Maas and Grattan, 1999; Ramoliya and Pandey, 2003; Sané et al., 2005; Elshibli et al., 2016; Müller et al., 2017). Despite high tolerance to abiotic stress, date palms require large volumes of water to produce commercial grade fruit and suffer from lower productivity and reduced fruit quality when subject to drought and salinity stress (Alhammadi and Kurup, 2012; Hussain et al., 2012). Date palms can grow in soils up to 12 dS m–1 without showing symptoms of salt stress (Ramoliya and Pandey, 2003). However, Maas and Grattan (1999) reported that for every unit of increasing salinity above 4 dS m–1, date palm experience a 3.6% decline in yield. Therefore, modest increases to soil salinity can have measurable impacts on crop productivity (Hussain et al., 2012) and long term irrigation with saline water may not be commercially viable (Tripler et al., 2007, 2011). In addition to impacts on yield, salinity impacts important agronomic traits including extending the juvenile stage by 2 years and delaying fruit development in adults (Tripler et al., 2007, 2011).

Many date palm growing areas are increasingly affected by saline soils (Pitman and Läuchli, 2004; Malash et al., 2008; Haj-Amor et al., 2016), drought (Elshibli et al., 2016), falling water tables (see references in Al-Muaini et al., 2019a), and increased groundwater salinity (Alfarrah and Walraevens, 2018). These factors have had significant effects on date palm cultivation. For example, in the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.), soil salinity is high in many areas due to over-irrigation with increasingly saline water such that a large percentage of farms have soil salinities in the 16–20 dS m–1 range (Dakheel, 2003). This has resulted in declining productivity in salt-affected areas and the abandonment of farms and crop failure in severe cases (Dakheel, 2003). In addition to regional concerns about date palm productivity, the high water usage requirements of date palm (i.e., up to 210 L per day per tree in the summer and approximately 1/3 of total groundwater use in the U.A.E.; Al-Muaini et al., 2019a) are putting pressure on regional authorities to moderate irrigation practices and evaluate the impact of irrigating date palms with increasingly saline water (Al-Muaini et al., 2019a, b). These concerns motivate expanding research on abiotic stress in date palm and laying a foundation for crop improvement.

Studies of date palm have begun to elucidate the mechanistic basis for abiotic stress tolerance in this species. For example, a recent report characterized a unique form of embryonic dormancy known as remote germination that protects organs and meristematic cells of early stage seedlings from dry surface soils and heat stress and may represent an adaptation to harsh desert conditions (Xiao et al., 2019). In the last few years, a number of studies have reported variation in the response to abiotic stresses among cultivars and their seedling progeny (Alhammadi and Edward, 2009; Al Kharusi et al., 2017; Al-Khateeb et al., 2019). Others have begun to probe the complex responses to abiotic stresses using genome-wide omic technologies such as transcriptomics, proteomics, methylomics, and metabolomics (Yaish and Kumar, 2015; Safronov et al., 2017; Yaish et al., 2017; Al-Harrasi et al., 2018; Rikek et al., 2019). Other recent developments include advances in transformation strategies for genetic engineering and gene editing (Prieto, 2011; Cardi et al., 2017), use of heterologous expression systems for studies of gene function (Patankar et al., 2019a, b), improvements to the date palm genome (Hazzouri et al., 2019), and demonstration of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for mapping phenotypic trait variation in date palm (Hazzouri et al., 2019). Despite these advances, there is presently limited prospect of crop improvement using conventional breeding or genomic selection owing to many challenges faced by perennial fruit crops (Laurens et al., 2012).

Salt and drought stress response mechanisms in date palms and other plants has been reviewed in a number of recent comprehensive treatments (date palms: Alhammadi and Kurup, 2012; Hussain et al., 2012; plants: Munns and Tester, 2008; Hanin et al., 2016; He et al., 2019). In this review, we highlight recent work on the effects of salt and drought on P. dactylifera including studies using omics-based technologies and those examining root and soil microbiomes effects on stress tolerance in this species. We also provide a perspective on directions for future genomic research and emphasize a need for application of forward genetic approaches (e.g., GWAS) to complement genome editing and other reverse genetic approaches to dissecting the molecular basis of stress tolerance traits. Finally, we discuss the need for improved resources including well-established protocols for transformation and gene editing, plant materials such as those required for mapping studies, and broader application of omic-related technologies to diverse cultivars of P. dactylifera and its Phoenix wild relatives.

Salinity

Salinity Tolerance in Date Palms

Salinity induces detrimental changes to the anatomy, physiology, and growth of plants. These changes are counteracted by mechanisms that mitigate the effects of stresses including osmotic and ion toxicity stress. Salinity inhibits water uptake and increases the concentration of toxic ions such as Na+, threatens membrane integrity, results in the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and contributes to imbalances in nutrient uptake. These effects have negative impacts on plant physiology including reduced photosynthetic capacity, impaired signaling, and alterations to cellular metabolism (Munns and Tester, 2008). These effects jointly contribute to reduced growth rates, increased rates of senescence, and lower yields of crops (Fricke et al., 2006; Sahi et al., 2006; Munns and Tester, 2008).

Plants mitigate these effects with diverse and complex sensing, signaling, and response pathways that determine the tolerance of a plant to salt (Hanin et al., 2016). These pathways interact to mount salt tolerance responses such as the production of compatible solutes (Munns and Tester, 2008), ion compartmentalization (e.g., in vacuoles), and neutralization of ROS. For example, plants neutralize ROS by producing antioxidant metabolites such as ascorbate, glutathione, and tocopherols or by expressing ROS-detoxifying enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), Ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes (APX), and catalase (CAT) (Huang et al., 2019). Another strategy is to exclude salt ions from entering the root or restricting the transport of Na+ within the plant. These mechanisms include changes to root anatomy such as limiting xylem Na+ loading and translocation, modifying membrane permeability to exclude toxic ions, and active exclusion of ions from cells via ion pumps (Zhu, 2003; Munns and Tester, 2008; Hanin et al., 2016).

Many early studies characterized the impact of salinity on date palm growth, physiology and tolerance response and revealed that date palm respond to salt with many of the same strategies as other plants (Alhammadi and Kurup, 2012; Hussain et al., 2012). For example, salt stress triggers the production of osmolytes and compatible solutes in date palm including proline (Djibril et al., 2005; Yaish, 2015). Other studies have reported that date palm ameliorate the effects of ROS by increasing the expression of anti-oxidant enzymes (Ait-El-Mokhtar et al., 2019) and increasing concentrations of anti-oxidant metabolites (Al Kharusi et al., 2019a).

Recent studies have characterized the effects of salt on different cultivars (or their seedling progeny). For example, in a study of seedling progeny of 10 cultivars, Al Kharusi et al. (2017) suggested that date palms could be separated into salt tolerant and sensitive cultivars based on root and shoot growth characteristics. They reported that the most salt sensitive varieties have elevated Na+ in roots and shoots, reduced shoot K+, reduced relative water content in leaves, and higher electrolyte leakage. A similar study of seedling offspring from 12 date palm cultivars reported similar changes in Na+ and K+, but also reported decreased Ca+ and Mg+ particularly in roots and changes in nitrogen and phosphorus contents in both roots and shoots in response to salt treatments (Alhammadi and Edward, 2009).

Al Kharusi et al. (2019b) studied the seedling offspring of a salt tolerant variety, ‘Umsila,’ and salt sensitive variety, ‘Zabad.’ They reported that salt tolerant seedlings responded to salinity by developing a thicker protective Casparian strip in roots, increasing osmolyte and compatible solute concentrations including proline, glycine betaine, and total sugar. These changes were associated with increased photosynthesis rates and development of a larger root system and leaf areas. Another study by these same authors suggested that the seedling offspring of the salt tolerant variety also balance their uptake of Na+ and K+ and maintain a higher concentration of antioxidant metabolites (Al Kharusi et al., 2019a).

Two recent studies by Patankar et al. (2019a, b) have studied the function of date palm salinity-response genes by expressing them in heterologous systems. Metallothioneins (MTs) are cysteine rich proteins that play a role in reducing oxidative damage under abiotic stress conditions. Patankar et al. (2019a) expressed the date palm metallothionein gene, PdMT2A, in a salt-sensitive yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) mutant which conferred tolerance to salinity, drought and oxidative stresses. Overexpression of PdMT2A in transgenic Arabidopsis resulted in reduced Na+ accumulation and maintenance of potassium/sodium (K+/Na+) ratio compared to wild type, which they attributed to the HKT transporter. In addition, transgenic lines showed higher chlorophyll content, higher superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) and better scavenging ability of ROS and were drought and oxidative stress tolerant.

In a related study, Patankar et al. (2019b) expressed date palm aquaporin PdPIP1;2 in yeast and reported improved tolerance to salinity and oxidative stresses. On the other hand, overexpression of the same gene in Arabidopsis showed symptoms of improved tolerance including enhanced biomass, chlorophyll content, root length under salt and drought conditions and high K+/Na+ compared to wild type. These two studies illustrate an approach to studying date palm gene function including the mechanisms by which genes may confer tolerance to abiotic stress.

These recent advances have provided new insight into the physiological basis for differences in the salinity response among date palm cultivars and highlighted approaches to characterizing the function of individual genes in salinity response pathways. At present, however, the genetic basis for variation in this response remains poorly understood and no candidate genes or mutations have been identified that might control variation in these traits among cultivars.

Omic Studies of Salinity Tolerance in Date Palm

Omic technologies have the potential to yield a system-level perspective on salinity response mechanisms through characterization of stress inducible genes, regulatory networks and biochemical pathways. A number of studies have adopted NGS (Next Generation Sequencing)-based profiling of the transcriptome and methylome. Others have adopted metabolomics or proteomic approaches to characterize the salinity response (Table 1). For example, Radwan et al. (2015) compared salt-treated and control samples of ‘Deglet Beida’ seedlings and reported differential gene expression (DGE) of a large percentage of genes in young roots including downregulation of sodium uptake and transport genes and upregulation of the ABA-signaling pathway. Other differentially expressed genes included members of the cell wall suberization and DNA repair pathways, and a putative cinnamoyl reductase enzyme that may divert flux from the phenylpropanoid pathway into lignin biosynthesis necessary for strengthening the cell wall. Future studies might use single-cell transcriptome analyses (Liu and Trapnell, 2016) to evaluate these hypotheses (Libault et al., 2017; Palovaara et al., 2017; Shulse et al., 2019).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Omic studies of abiotic stress in date palm.

Another RNA-seq study reported DGE in the leaves and roots of salt-treated versus control samples (Yaish et al., 2017). Genes that were differentially expressed in the leaves had roles in photosynthesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, and oxidative phosphorylation, while differentially expressed genes in the roots function in tryptophan, purine, and thiamine metabolism. Some genes, including High-Affinity Potassium Transporter 8 (HKT8 = HKT1;5), vacuolar proton pump, and the auxin-conjugating enzyme GH3, were differentially expressed in both the leaves and the roots. The authors also observed the upregulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) in leaf in response to salt which they speculated could indicate salinity-induced activation of C4 or CAM photosynthesis pathways.

Yaish et al. (2015b) quantified microRNAs, or miRNA, expression in the leaves and roots of seedlings in control versus salt stressed conditions. They reported 57 and 25 miRNAs that were differentially expressed in leaf and root in response to salt stress. The authors listed a number of mRNA targets of these miRNAs that they speculated may be salinity-related including hormone response elements (e.g., abscisic acid responsive elements-binding factor), kinases, transcription factors, and transporters (Yaish and Kumar, 2015). The observation that microRNAs are differentially expressed in response to salinity stress suggests a possible role for these genes in the salinity response, although the authors cautioned that their observations would benefit from further validation.

Another study examined the effect of silicon on salt-stressed date palm seedlings. Jana et al. (2019) used metabolic profiling to measure thousands of metabolites, such as antioxidant compounds (e.g., pyridoxine, cepharanthine), osmoregulators (e.g., mucic acid) and intermediate detoxification (e.g., S-D-lactoylglutathione, beta-cyano-L-alanine) in roots and leaves that accumulated in response to silicon, salt, and in combination. They showed that in non-stressful conditions, silicon promotes growth of date palm seedlings, whereas in the salinity treatment, silicon acted as a negative regulator of salt stress. Studies of the differential accumulation of metabolites in response to silicon and salt treatments could yield insight into the protective role of silicon under salinity stress.

Drought

Tolerance to Drought in Date Palms

The availability of water is central to virtually all components of plant physiology and plants have evolved a complex array of mechanisms to maintain high water potential in drought conditions (Jarvis and Jarvis, 2006). Maintenance of water potential is achieved by minimizing water loss via transpiration and maximizing water uptake and includes rapid response mechanisms including closure of stomata (Cowan, 1977) and longer term changes to plant anatomy and gene expression (Chaves et al., 2003). For example, plants control water loss by modifying leaf characteristics, such as the production of cuticle wax (Hadley and Smith, 2011) and reducing leaf area and stomatal conductance through leaf senescence (Munné-Bosch and Alegre, 2004). At the physiological level, reduced water availability causes systemic changes in plant physiology including increased osmotic stress, reduced photosynthetic rates and the production of ROS. Among the most important responses to these effects are the production of molecular chaperones, anti-oxidants and compatible solutes via many of the same stress responsive pathways induced by salinity stress that constitute a general response to abiotic stress (He et al., 2018).

Date palms have a number of anatomical characteristics that contribute to tolerance of hyper-arid conditions. For example, date palms maintain thick, waxy cuticle and pinnately compound leaves covered with many spines, which insulate the tip growing point. The deep root system in date palms traps water in various types of soils. Those traits reduce evaporation and maximize water uptake and contribute to P. dactylifera tolerance for drought stress (Nixon, 1951; Wickens, 1998; Ramoliya and Pandey, 2003; Sané et al., 2005). Nevertheless, long periods of drought negatively impact date palm by reducing growth, fruit quality and yield (Elshibli et al., 2016).

One active area of research has focused on anatomical features of date palm roots that may represent adaptations to desert conditions including drought. Xiao et al. (2019) reported a novel form of germination where organs and meristem cells experience a period of developmental arrest. They reported that date palm develop a tuber-like structure called the cotyledonary petiole that protects the developing embryo in the soil. This same study also reported that date palms maintain suberized and lignified xylem, phloem and bundle cells in roots and produce pneumatophores, a specialized type of root. These authors speculated that these anatomical features may account for the adaptation of date palm to drought and salinity.

Arab et al. (2016), subjected 2 year old date palm seedlings to drought and heat. Briefly, the authors reported that photosynthesis was not affected by these stresses, despite a drop in the concentration of antioxidants including ascorbate and glutathione in leaves. The authors suggested that reduced concentrations of anti-oxidants may be compensated by a concomitant increase in the activity of a anti-oxidant enzyme, glutathione reductase. Furthermore, increased emission of isoprene under heat supported its role as an antioxidant. Finally, they also reported a change in fatty acid composition under drought, but not heat, which could suggest that date palms have independent response pathways to drought and heat stress.

A recent study by Yaish (2015) reported that date palm seedlings accumulate proline not only in response to drought and salinity stress, but also in response to extreme temperatures and abscisic acid treatments. They concluded that proline production is a common response for multiple stressors, which make it a possible marker in date palm breeding programs that aim to improve drought and salt tolerance.

In contrast to the study of salinity, fewer studies have assessed variation in the response of date palm cultivars to reductions in the availability of water. A recent study by Al-Khateeb et al. (2019) simulated osmotic stress in micropropagated date palm plantlets by adding mannitol to the culture medium. The three cultivars studied showed reduced root, shoot, and total biomass, intercellular CO2 assimilation rate, transpiration rate and water content in water-stressed conditions at the seedling stage. However, they reported that there were only weak differences among cultivars in their tolerances.

Omic Studies of Water Shortage in Date Palm

There are presently few omics studies of drought in date palm (Table 1). A recent proteomics study identified genes involved in salt and drought tolerance in P. dactylifera (Rabey et al., 2016). The researchers challenged 3-month seedlings of the ‘Sagae’ cultivar with polyethylene glycol (82.5 g/L) and salinity (43 g/L) and identified 47 differentially expressed genes in the leaves. Thirteen of the genes were responsive to both salt and drought, 17 others were responsive only to salt stress, while the remaining only under drought. Some of the differentially expressed genes that were downregulated under drought included ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, carboxylase/oxygenase, oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 2, chloroplastic-like, and cytochrome P450 implying the deactivation of the photosynthetic pathways in response to the treatment conditions.

Safronov et al. (2017) used transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling to characterize the response to heat and drought stress in P. dactylifera (Table 1). The two stresses had similar effects including the upregulation of soluble carbohydrates and increased antioxidant activity in the cytosol, chloroplasts, and peroxisomes. Differentially expressed genes involved in circadian and diurnal rhythm in response to combined heat and drought were reported and implied a novel stress-avoidance strategy.

Another study applied ABA to date palm leaves to mimick the effects of drought (Table 1; Müller et al., 2017). The authors reported a DGE analysis between ABA-treatment and control conditions and reported a broad overlap in differentially expressions genes in date palm and drought stress-responsive genes in Arabidopsis. For example, the date palm response to ABA includes well-known genes in Arabidopsis including phosphatases in the PP2C family, ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters, late embryogenesis abundant proteins (LEAs) and MYB74, a guard cell transcription factor.

The Date Palm Microbiome and Abiotic Stress

Plants have evolved associations between roots and soil microbes that confer tolerance to abiotic stress. This root-associated microbiome, or rhizobiome, consists of plant roots and their associated bacteria and fungi that alter plant development and physiology, confer resistance to pathogens, and confer tolerance to various abiotic stresses such as salinity and drought (Mefteh et al., 2017; Yaish et al., 2017; Jones et al., 2019). For example, plants improve their tolerance of abiotic stress by altering root exudates and modifying the species composition of the rhizobiome (Berg et al., 2013; Mapelli et al., 2013; Hacquard et al., 2017; Berendsen et al., 2018; Sasse et al., 2018; Whitaker et al., 2018). The microbiome enhances stress resistance by promoting osmolyte accumulation, alleviating oxidative stress by enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms, or synthesizing hormone-like substances that modulate root expansion and hormone homeostasis (Bérard et al., 2011; De Zélicourt et al., 2013).

The ability of the plant root system to be colonized by endophytes (beneficial microbes able to colonize the root inner tissues) is essential for plants to receive benefits including protection against abiotic stress. For instance, bacterial acetyl co-carboxylase deaminase (ACCD) enzyme facilitates plant growth under environmental constraints and was found to help endophytic colonization within plants (Sessitsch et al., 2012). Heterologous expression of ACCD in P. dactylifera could promote the colonization of various beneficial endophytes.

Phoenix dactylifera thrives in oasis ecosystems, where microbial communities help plants to tolerate environmental extremes (Kumar et al., 2011). Although endophytic bacteria enhance plant growth under abiotic stress (Rolli et al., 2014), there are few studies on P. dactylifera endophytic bacteria and their role in the acquisition of salt and drought tolerance. The use of NGS will enhance the characterization of endophytic microbiota of P. dactylifera and would lead to a better understanding of the biodiversity in the rhizosphere. This would help dissect the function of beneficial microbial symbiosis and the molecular mechanisms by which symbiosis is established and exerts beneficial effects (Köberl et al., 2011; Marasco et al., 2012).

The root and leaf microbiomes of date palm represent diverse communities comprised of bacterial and fungal species. In a recent study in the Sahara Desert in Tunisia, the bacterial communities selected by the root system of date palm were dominated mainly by Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria irrespective of the edaphic conditions or geographical location (Mosqueira et al., 2019). A study by Cherif et al. (2015) of the ecology of date palm root endophytes from oasis desert farms in southern Tunisia indicates that date palm roots select diverse endophytic communities that are able to promote plant growth under drought conditions. Another study identified endophytic bacterial and fungal communities in P. dactylifera grown under salt stress using pyrosequencing and showed that the composition of those microbial communities changed significantly in response to changes in salinity (Yaish et al., 2015a, 2016).

The most common fungal endophytes isolated from P. dactylifera are Penicillium citrinum isolate TDPEF34 and Geotrichum candidum isolate TDPEF20, which represent a promising source of diverse bioactive metabolites (Mefteh et al., 2018). The most frequently isolated genus of endophytic bacteria from P. dactylifera is Pseudomonas, which is well-known for its growth-promoting properties (Roca et al., 2012; Skz et al., 2013). In drought-like conditions, innoculation of date palm roots with these endophytic bacteria promotes growth (Cherif et al., 2015). Pseudomonas isolated from P. dactylifera showed a number of potential plant growth promoting (PGP) properties including enhanced inorganic phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation, and the production of siderophores, phytohormones,1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase, and exopolysaccharide.

Fungi also provide PGP services. The most studied group of PGP fungi are the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF), which belong to the Glomeromycota and form symbiotic associations with plants by colonizing the root. A recent study of the effect of innoculating date palm roots with AMF improved tolerance under drought and salt-stressed conditions (Meddich et al., 2018). Ait-El-Mokhtar et al. (2019) also reported that date palm seedling roots colonized by AMF structures improved tolerance to salt stress.

The research focus has changed in the past few years from the identification of individual microbial strains with growth-promoting effects to metagenomic studies of the abundance and diversity of root microbiomes. Studies that have applied high-throughput sequencing analyses have revealed that the rhizosphere niche is an ecological hotspot where roots host a tremendous array of microbial taxa (Bulgarelli et al., 2013; Busby et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2018; Khare et al., 2018). NGS-based technologies have yet to be applied to studies of the date palm root microbriome.

There are many strategies for engineering the plant microbiome such as host-mediated and multi-generation microbiome selection, inoculation of bulk soils and the rhizosphere, and other approaches (Orozco-Mosqueda et al., 2018; Timm et al., 2018; Jochum et al., 2019a, b; Khan et al., 2019). Engineering of the root-associated microbiome can be used to alter microbiome composition and potentially improve tolerance to abiotic stress. While bioengineering of the plant microbiome is in its infancy, it is an interesting option to improve the biological capabilities of plants (Qiu et al., 2019).

Perspectives

Increases in ground and soil salinity and depletion of fresh water resources necessitate characterization of abiotic stress response pathways and creation of a road map that outlines steps toward developing a more tolerant date palm crop. Breeding for improvement in P. dactylifera using conventional breeding was conducted in the United States into the 1970s but has since been terminated (Krueger, 2001). The prospect for improvement via conventional breeding or modern approaches, such as genomics-assisted breeding (Kole et al., 2015) or genomic selection as used in oil palm (Nyouma et al., 2019), faces challenges owing to significant economic and technical constraints. However, despite many challenges, it is our belief that a combination of omics, forward genetics, and reverse genetics approaches provide a potential path to improvement of the data palm crop. Below we describe approaches to genetic mapping of stress tolerance traits that can yield candidate genes and mutations that control variation in tolerance among cultivars. We then describe how genes discovered by genetic mapping can be targeted by gene editing [e.g., by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) associated protein 9 (Cas9)] toward the goal of engineering varieties with improved stress tolerance.

Genome Resources

There is a need for continued improvement to the genome assembly and gene annotation of date palm. There are presently three draft assemblies including two female (Al-Dous et al., 2011; Al-Mssallem et al., 2013) and one male genome (Hazzouri et al., 2019). The two female draft genomes are fragmented assemblies of the ‘Khalas’ cultivar with low contiguity, while the male assembly is derived from a fourth generation backcross male of a cross with the ‘Barhee’ cultivar as the recurrent parent. This BC4 male assembly is the only one of the three genomes to include long read sequencing technology (i.e., Pacific Biosciences), integrate a genetic map to place contigs on linkage groups (Mathew et al., 2014), and use a diploid aware assembler (i.e., FALCON-Unzip). The BC4 male primary assembly represents a substantial improvement to previous assemblies that consists of approximately 50% of the genome sequence being placed on the 18 linkage groups (Hazzouri et al., 2019). The primary sequence and gene models can be accessed at the Date Palm Genome Hub website1 (Hazzouri et al., 2019).

There remains much room for improvement of the date palm genome. Some of the factors currently limiting improvement are the absence of a high density genetic map and the heterozygosity of date palm cultivars including the BC4 male. Improvements to the current assemblies can be achieved by adopting improved diploid aware assembly software, inclusion of a high density genetic map, and incorporation of additional technologies (e.g., Hi-C, Dudchenko et al., 2017). Despite the prospect of additional improvements using these methods, a high quality assembly for date palm may require generation of a homozygous double haploid variety (Das et al., 2018). For example, sequencing of a double haploid contributed to dramatic improvements to the apple genome compared with an earlier assembly derived from a heterozygous sample (Daccord et al., 2017). Improvements to the date palm genome will assist in many areas of abiotic stress research including providing a more complete set of gene models and chromosome-level sequences that will improve the prospect of discovering candidate genes with genetic mapping and enhance discovery using many other omic technologies.

Linkage Mapping and GWAS

A primary objective of mapping studies is to determine loci that control heritable variation in phenotypic traits. These ‘forward genetic’ approaches comprise a powerful set of methods to identify genes that control variation in phenotypic traits and dissect their genetic basis. Genetic mapping can yield candidate genes and mutations that control variation in a trait and suggest strategies for its modification using genetic engineering. In other cases, genetic mapping can lead to discovery of linked markers that can be used in marker-assisted selection (MAS) (Das et al., 2017) and crop breeding.

Linkage mapping of QTL in fruit and other tree crops is typically initiated with a cross between non-inbred parents (Khan and Korban, 2012). In the simplest experimental design, full-sib progeny of outbred parents are genotyped at set of anonymous markers and phenotyped for a trait of interest. Linkage mapping is then conducted to identify marker-trait associations using statistical models appropriate for this design (e.g., the double pseudo-testcross approach; Grattapaglia and Sederoff, 1994). This approach has been applied to map naturally occuring variants in many forest trees and fruit crops (Wu et al., 2010; Khan and Korban, 2012) and could in principle be applied to map traits in plants produced by mutagenesis of somatic embryogenic cell suspensions (Jain, 2012). Linkage mapping is possible in date palm as hundreds to thousands of seedlings from controlled crosses (i.e., pollen from a single male used to pollinate a single female) can be generated to produce full-sib progeny for standard linkage mapping or half-sib progeny (i.e., one male used to pollinate different female cultivars) for use in a pedigree-based mapping designs.

An alternative approach is to leverage natural variation to map traits using GWAS (Khan and Korban, 2012; Korte and Farlow, 2013). In a typical GWAS experiment, hundreds of unrelated samples are phenotyped typically in a common garden such as a nursery or farm for a trait of interest and then genotyped (e.g., using NGS-based whole genome re-sequencing). This is an attractive alternative with a number of advantages over linkage mapping. First, a trait is more likely to segregate in a large GWAS panel than in a cross between two samples. Second, QTL intervals are smaller in GWAS studies in most tree and fruit crops due to the rapid decay of linkage disequilibrium (Khan and Korban, 2012). This makes discovery of candidate genes more likely provided that marker density is sufficiently high to detect marker-trait associations.

Mapping approaches have not been widely applied in date palms. Hazzouri et al. (2019) conducted GWAS on fruit-related traits in 145 varieties of date palm using high density genotyping using moderate coverage (i.e., the average number of sequencing reads spanning each genomic position) whole genome Illumina sequencing reads mapped to an improved genome assembly. In date palm, the decay of linkage disequilibrium is sufficiently fast (Hazzouri et al., 2015; Flowers et al., 2019) that GWAS yielded candidate genes and probable causal mutations for fruit color and fruit sugar composition (Hazzouri et al., 2019). The successful high resolution mapping of these traits demonstrated the viability of combined NGS-based sequencing and standard structured association mapping in date palm and produced markers for sex determination and commercially important fruit traits that could in principle be incorporated in future MAS experiments.

Mapping abiotic stress-related traits in adult date palms is currently intractable owing to the long juvenile stage and cost of growing and maintaining large mapping populations. An alternate solution would be to map such traits in early stage seedlings where environmental conditions can be carefully controlled. For example, linkage mapping on full-sibs from a controlled cross, GWAS on unrelated seedlings (e.g., diverse female cultivars pollinated with unrelated males), or a hybrid approach such as F1 association mapping (FOAM, Romero Navarro et al., 2017) are all plausible approaches to mapping in early stage date palm seedlings. A disadvantage of these approaches is that individual seedlings cannot be cloned easily for the purpose of generating replicate samples for phenotyping owing to the difficulty of establishing new micropropagation lines (Mazri and Meziani, 2015). These approaches therefore require phenotyping single samples as is common in animal and human genetics, but less common in plants. Such single plant linkage mapping or GWAS (“sp-GWAS,” Gyawali et al., 2019) suffers from increased error in phenotypic measurements owing to lack of replication and the inability to phenotype a seedling genotype in multiple environments or treatments (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Approaches to mapping abiotic stress traits in date palm.

An alternate approach would be to conduct GWAS on early stage plants from diverse varieties propagated in tissue culture (Figure 1). Use of micropropagated varieties would (1) allow expensive genotyping steps to be performed only once on a clonal lineage followed by phenotyping of many traits, (2) facilitate phenotyping of replicates of a clone thereby reducing the effects of measurement error and plant-to-plant variability in phenotypic measures, (3) allow experiments to be replicated in different environments or treatments to ensure stability of QTLs (4) allow more complex experimental designs to be adopted. For example, clones of each genotype would allow paired measurements of phenotypic responses to abiotic stress through measurements of the phenotype in a clone grown in both treatment and control conditions. Adoption of tissue culture-propagated cultivars in large-scale experimental programs would require a significant effort including expansion of the numbers of cultivars currently being propagated in tissue culture.

Mapping of early stage stress response traits from micropropagated cultivars or seedling offspring from controlled crosses suffers from additional challenges. First, sample sizes required for successful mapping depend on the genetic architecture of the trait. Even the simplest traits can require hundreds of samples and more complex traits may require much larger sample sizes. Second, both approaches require genotyping of large numbers of seedling progeny or clonally propagated varieties which in date palm are both highly heterozygous. NGS-based whole genome re-sequencing approaches to genotyping offer the best opportunity to identify candidate genes and mutations. However, use of this approach to genotype highly heterozygous samples likely requires moderate to deep sequencing because imputation – the use of linkage information to infer missing genotypes – may not be possible without reference panels and low coverage sequencing approaches used in inbred crops (Wang et al., 2016) may not be viable owing to high genotyping error rates at heterozygous sites. Reduced representation libraries [e.g., Genotype-by-sequencing (GBS); Elshire et al., 2011)] or array-based genotyping may provide more cost effective solutions, but they may yield insufficient marker density to map traits with GWAS (Figure 1).

Genetic Transformation and Gene Editing

The genetic engineering of date palm lags behind that of other species such as rice, barley, and maize and fruit crops such as apple (Waltz, 2015; Nishitani et al., 2016) and oil palm (Budiani et al., 2018) where genetic transformation has been adopted for improvements at the commercial level. The factor currently limiting advancements in date palm is that there is not a well-established transformation protocol. Attempts to transform P. dactylifera using either Agrobacterium tumefaciens or microprojectile bombardment has been met with limited success, and no conclusive report of stable transformants of an expressed gene in date palm have yet been successful (Jain, 2012).

Genome editing methods, such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and CRISPR/Cas9 have all enhanced the prospect of genetic modification of crops (Kanchiswamy et al., 2015). The former technologies are expensive and time consuming and require protein engineering, which makes them less suitable and limits their application (Jaganathan et al., 2018), while CRISPR/Cas9 is popular because it is affordable, scaleable, and relatively simple to apply (Jia and Wang, 2014; Jia et al., 2016).

CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing can be used to knockout, activate or repress the expression of target genes. Successful editing can use transformation of a construct containing Cas9 and a guide RNA (sgRNA) that is homologous to a target gene in the plant genome, or may use alternative “DNA-free” approaches such as CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs). Key considerations for the prospect of CRISPR/Cas9 editing in plants include the gene to target, the sgRNA sequence, the delivery method and plant tissue (e.g., callus), and the regeneration of fertile plants (Altpeter et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2019). Many of these and additional considerations are reviewed in detail by Sattar et al. (2017) in the context of improvement of date palm. For example Sattar et al. (2017) highlighted that high heterozygosity of date palm cultivars can make it challenging to design the sgRNA, which must match a target region near a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) site.

CRISPR/Cas9 offers a number of benefits well-suited to modification of dioecious tree crops such as date palm (Kole et al., 2015). Any strategy for improvement in tree crops should prioritize development of a modified plant in as few generations as possible, ideally a single generation. One advantage of CRISPR/Cas9 in this respect is that it produces biallelic edits that result in homozygous changes at the target site, which eliminates the need for a genetic cross to produce homozygous alterations (Kole et al., 2015). Another consideration is the need to minimize the footprint of the gene editing procedure in the date palm genome. For example, transformation of somatic embryos with Agrobacterium can lead to random integration of bacterial plasmids which may contribute to GMO-related regulatory constraints (Sattar et al., 2017). A possible alternative is the use of next-generation DNA-free CRISPR/Cas9 RNPs, which can be delivered directly into protoplasts as has been done in apples in an effort to increase resistance to fire blight disease (Malnoy et al., 2016).

Lessons from genetic engineering of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) may help with developing strategies for P. dactylifera. For example, both microprojectile bombardment (Kadir et al., 2015) and Agrobacterium (Budiani et al., 2018) have been used to transform oil palm. Moreover, Crispr/Cas9 technology has been succesful in oil palm. Budiani et al. (2018) used Agrobacterium to introduce the CRISPR/Cas9 constructs for editing isoflavone reductase and metallothionein -like protein in an effort to introduce resistance to Ganoderma. Given the success in other crops, we anticipate that CRISPR/Cas9 will soon provide a means for creating stable site-directed gene edits in date palm and may provide the best chance at modification of date palm.

Phoenix Crop Wild Relatives

Another under-utilized resource in the study of abiotic stress in date palm is the wild relatives of date palm. Members of the genus Phoenix are known to occupy diverse habitats ranging from the banks of the Mekong River (Phoenix roebelenii) and coastal areas subject to salt-water incursion (Phoenix theophrasti) (Barrow, 1998). The range of habitats occupied by Phoenix wild relatives suggests that these species harbor a diversity of stress-tolerance traits that could be exploited for the study and improvement of date palm. Incorporation of wild relatives in experimental programs is becoming increasingly important in perennial crop improvement strategies (Migicovsky and Myles, 2017) and first steps toward characterizing this diversity have been taken through whole genome sequencing of the closest relatives of date palms (Gros-Balthazard et al., 2017; Flowers et al., 2019).

Exploitation of diversity in wild relatives of cultivated Phoenix may benefit from the fact that many species in this genus readily hybridize and produce viable hybrids either from seed generated from inter-specific crosses or from somatic embryogenesis (Gros-Balthazard, 2013). A prospective area for future research is to characterize differences in abiotic stress tolerance in the crop wild relatives of date palm. In the long term, it may also be possible to map traits in inter-specific crosses as has been done in oil palm (Osorio-Guarin et al., 2019) or transfer beneficial traits into date palm using somatic embryogenesis (Sudhersan et al., 2009).

Conclusion

Application of omic methods has begun to detail the genes and biochemical pathways that control the response to abiotic stress in date palm. Many of these pathways such as the abscisic acid pathway are known from studies of other crops, but others including circadian and diurnal rhythm pathways may suggest novel pathways in date palm (Safronov et al., 2017). Future advances will benefit from combining omic approaches with reverse and forward genetics. For example, Yaish and Kumar (2015) previously advocated for reverse genetics approaches (e.g., site-directed mutagenesis and recombinant DNA technologies) to the study of abiotic stress in date palm. Indeed, development of a well-established protocol for transformation of callus or other micropropagated tissues and development of CRISPR/Cas9 or gene editing technology for date palm (Sattar et al., 2017) would present new opportunities for functional studies of abiotic stress tolerance and crop improvement. However, we also argue that genetic mapping offers a complementary set of methods that can be applied to identify QTLs that control variation among cultivars in traits such as abiotic stress resistance. Localization of QTLs to narrow genomic regions, when combined with RNA-seq and other functional omic data, can lead to discovery of candidate genes and causal mutations. In principle, candidate genes and mutations identified in this fashion could then be modified with gene editing techniques in stress sensitive elite commercial cultivars.

The prospect of improvement of date palm to abiotic stress described above is a long term goal. Achieving this goal will require development of a detailed road map with input from scientists from multiple disciplines and various stakeholders. However, a critical review of improvement for abiotic stress tolerance in cereals and other annual crops reported that attempts at improvement have had limited success. Some of the challenges include the multi-genic nature of stress resistance traits and QTLs for yield traits are often unstable across environments. For example, improved genotypes often show higher yields under stress, but lower yields in non-stressed conditions (Flowers, 2004).

For the near term, we suggest that efforts in date palm focus on stream-lining reverse genetic technologies including transformation methods and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, expanding germplasm resources (e.g., increased numbers of cultivars in tissue culture), GWAS mapping of abiotic stress traits, application of omic technologies to diverse cultivars and crop wild relatives, and characterization and manipulation of soil and root microbiomes. Achieving these goals would dramatically improve the outlook for crop improvement in date palm.

Author Contributions

KA, KH, KM, and JF organized the preparation and wrote the manuscript. JF generated the figure. DN and AL assisted with writing and editing the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by funding from KCGEB, UAEU and by a research grant from research 399 office, United Arab Emirates University (Grant No. 31F096 to KM).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Gina M. Pham, Simon C. Groen, and Robert R. Krueger for helpful discussions about various aspects of this work.

Footnotes

  1. ^ https://datepalmgenomehub.abudhabi.nyu.edu

References

Aaouine, M. (2003). “Date palm large-sccale propagation through tissue culture techniques,” in The Date Palm: From Traditional Resource to Green Wealth, (Abu Dhabi: UAE Center of Studies and Strategy Researches), 79–94.

Google Scholar

Ait-El-Mokhtar, M., Ben Laouane, R., Anli, M., Boutasknit, A., Wahbi, S., and Meddich, A. (2019). Use of mycorrhizal fungi in improving tolerance of the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) seedlings to salt stress. Sci. Hortic. 253, 429–438. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.066

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al Kharusi, L., Al Yahyai, R., and Yaish, M. W. (2019a). Antioxidant response to salinity in salt-tolerant and salt-susceptible cultivars of date palm. Agric. Basel 9:8. doi: 10.3390/agriculture9010008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al Kharusi, L., Sunkar, R., Al-Yahyai, R., and Yaish, M. W. (2019b). Comparative water relations of two contrasting date palm genotypes under salinity. Int. J. Agron. 2019:4262013.

Google Scholar

Al Kharusi, L., Dekoum, A., Al-Yahyai, R., and Yaish, M. W. (2017). Screening of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars for salinity tolerance. Forests 8:136. doi: 10.3390/f8040136

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al-Dous, E., George, B., Al-Mahmoud, M., Al-Jaber, M., Wang, H., Salameh, Y., et al. (2011). De novo genome sequencing and comparative genomics of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 521–527. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1860

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alfarrah, N., and Walraevens, K. (2018). Groundwater overexploitation and seawater intrusion in coastal areas of arid and semi-arid regions. Water 10:143. doi: 10.3390/w10020143

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alhammadi, M. S., and Edward, G. P. (2009). Effect of salinity on growth of twelve cultivars of the united arab emirates date palm. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 40, 2372–2388. doi: 10.1080/00103620903111293

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alhammadi, M. S., and Kurup, S. S. (2012). “Impact of salinity stress on date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L) – a review,” in Crop Production Technologies, eds P. Sharma and V. Abrol (Croatia: Rijek).

Google Scholar

Al-Harrasi, I., Al-Yahyai, R., and Yaish, M. W. (2018). Differential DNA methylation and transcription profiles in date palm roots exposed to salinity. PLoS One 13:e0191492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191492

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al-Khateeb, S. A., Al-Khateeb, A. A., Beltagi, H. S., and Muhammad, N. S. (2019). Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in three date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars. Fresenius Environ. Bul.28, 4671–4683.

Google Scholar

Al-Mssallem, I. S., Hu, S., and Zhang, X. (2013). Genome sequence of the date palm Phoenix dactylifera L. Nat. Commun. 4, 2274–2274. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3274

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al-Muaini, A., Green, S., Dakheel, A., Abdullah, A.-H., Abou Dahr, W. A., Dixon, S., et al. (2019a). Irrigation management with saline groundwater of a date palm cultivar in the hyper-arid united arab emirates. Agric. Water Manag. 211, 123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al-Muaini, A., Green, S., Dakheel, A., Abdullah, A., Sallam, O., Abou Dahr, W. A., et al. (2019b). Water requirements for irrigation with saline groundwater of three date-palm cultivars with different salt-tolerances in the hyper-arid united arab emirates. Agric. Water Manag. 222, 213–220. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Altpeter, F., Springer, N., Bartley, L., Blechl, A., Brutnell, T., Citovsky, V., et al. (2016). Advancing crop transformation in the era of genome editing. Plant Cell 28, 1510–1520. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00196

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arab, L., Kreuzwieser, J., Kruse, J., Zimmer, I., Ache, P., Alfarraj, S., et al. (2016). Acclimation to heat and drought – lessons to learn from the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Environ. Exp. Bot. 125, 20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.01.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrow, S. C. (1998). A monograph of Phoenix L. (Palmae: Coryphoideae). Kew Bulle. 53, 513–575.

Google Scholar

Bérard, A., Bouchet, T., Sévenier, G., Pablo, A.-L., and Gros, R. (2011). Resilience of soil microbial communities impacted by severe drought and high temperature in the context of mediterranean heat waves. Eur.J. Soil Biol. 47, 333–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.08.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berendsen, R. I., Vismans, G., Yu, K., Song, Y., Jonge, R., Burgman, W. P., et al. (2018). Disease-induced assemblage of a plant-beneficial bacterial consortium. ISME J. 12:1496. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0093-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berg, G., Alavi, M., Schmidt, C., Zachow, C., Egamberdieva, D., Kamilova, F., et al. (2013). “Biocontrol and osmoprotection for plants under salinated conditions,” in Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere, ed. F. J. Bruijn (New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 587–592. doi: 10.1002/9781118297674.ch55

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Budiani, A., Putranto, R. A., Riyadi, I., Sumaryono Minarsih, H., and Faizah, R. (2018). IOP Conf. Series. Earth Environ.Sci. 183:012003. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/183/1/012003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., Themaat, E., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013). Structure and Functions of the Bacterial Microbiota of Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 807–838. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Busby, P., Soman, C., Wagner, M., Friesen, M., Kremer, J., Bennett, A., et al. (2017). Research priorities for harnessing plant microbiomes in sustainable agriculture. PLoS Biol. 15:e2001793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cardi, T., D’Agostino, N., and Tripodi, P. (2017). Genetic transformation and genomic resources for next-generation precise genome engineering in vegetable crops. Front. Plant Sci. 8:241. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chao, C. T., and Krueger, R. R. (2007). The date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L): overview of biology, uses, and cultivation. Hort Sci. 42, 1077–1082. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.42.5.1077

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., and Pereira, J. S. (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought-from genes to the whole plant. Funct. Plant Biol. 30, 239–264.

Google Scholar

Cherif, H., Marasco, R., Rolli, E., Ferjani, R., Fusi, M., Soussi, A., et al. (2015). Oasis desert farming selects environment-specific date palm root endophytic communities and cultivable bacteria that promote resistance to drought: oasis palm endophytes promote drought resistance. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 7, 668–678. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cowan, I. R. (1977). Stomatal behavior and environment. Adv. Bot.Res. 190, 117–228.

Google Scholar

Daccord, N., Celton, J. M., Linsmith, G., Becker, C., Choisne, N., Schijlen, E., et al. (2017). High-quality de novo assembly of the apple genome and methylome dynamics of early fruit development. Nat. Genet. Adv. 49, 1099–1106. doi: 10.1038/ng.3886

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dakheel, A. (2003). “Date palm and biosaline agriculture in the united arab emirates,” in The Date Palm: From Traditional Resource to Green Wealth, (Abu Dhabi: UAE Center of Studies and Strategy Researches), 199–211.

Google Scholar

Das, A., Kumar, K., Tribhuvan, K., Suvadarshni, D., and Mishra, M. (2018). Development of haploid and double haploid in fruit crops - a review. Int. J Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7, 2119–2132. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.247

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Das, G., Patra, J. K., and Baek, K. H. (2017). Insight into MAS: a molecular tool for development of stress resistant and quality of rice through gene stacking. Front. Plant Sci. 8:985. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Zélicourt, A., Al-Yousif, M., and Hirt, H. (2013). rhizosphere microbes as essential partners for plant stress tolerance. Mo. Plant. 6, 242–245. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Djibril, S., Mohamed, O. K., Diaga, D., Diégane, D., Abaye, F. B., Maurice, S., et al. (2005). Growth and development of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) seedlings under drought and salinity stresses. Afri. J. Biotechnol. 4, 968–972.

Google Scholar

Dudchenko, O., Batra, S. S., Omer, A. D., Nyquist, S. K., Hoeger, M., Durand, N. C., et al. (2017). De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science 356, eaal3327. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3327

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elshibli, S., Elshibli, M. S., and Korpelainen, H. (2016). Growth and photosynthetic CO2 responses of date palm plants to water availability. Emir. J. Food Agric. 28, 58–65. doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2015.05.189

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J. A., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., et al. (2011). A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6:e19379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flowers, J. M., Hazzouri, K. M., Gros-Balthazard, M., Mo, Z., Koutroumpa, K., Perrakis, A., et al. (2019). Cross-species hybridization and the origin of North African date palms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 116, 1651–1658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817453116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flowers, T. J. (2004). Improving crop salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot 55, 307–319. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fricke, W., Akhiyarova, G., Wei, W., Alexandersson, E., Miller, A., Kjellbom, P. O., et al. (2006). The short-term growth response to salt of the developing barley leaf. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 1079–1095. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grattapaglia, D., and Sederoff, R. (1994). Genetic linkage maps of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla using a pseudo-testcross: mapping strategy and RAPD markers. Genetics 137, 1121–1137.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Gros-Balthazard, M., Galimberti, M., Kousathanas, A., Newton, C., Ivorra, S., Paradis, L., et al. (2017). The discovery of wild date palms in oman reveals a complex domestication history involving centers in the middle east and Africa. Curr. Biol. 27, 2211.e8–2218.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gros-Balthazard, M. (2013). Hybridization in the genus phoenix: a review. Emir. J. Food Agric. 25, 831–842. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esy064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gyawali, A., Shrestha, V., Guill, K. E., Flint-Garcia, S., and Beissinger, T. M. (2019). Single-plant GWAS coupled with bulk segregant analysis allows rapid identification and corroboration of plantheight candidate SNPs. BMC Plant Biol. 19:412. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2000-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hacquard, S., Spaepen, S., Garrido-Oter, R., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2017). Interplay between innate immunity and the plant microbiota. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55, 565–589. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-35623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hadley, J., and Smith, W. (2011). Influence of leaf surface wax and leaf-area to water-content ratio on cuticular transpiration in western Conifers. USA. Can. J. For.Res. 20, 1306–1311510.

Google Scholar

Haj-Amor, Z., Ibrahimi, M. K., Feki, N., Lhomme, J. P., and Bouri, S. (2016). Soil salinization and irrigation management of date palms in a Saharan environment. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188:497. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5488-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hanin, M., Ebel, C., Ngom, M., Laplaze, L., and Masmoudi, K. (2016). new insights on plant salt 511 tolerance mechanisms and their potential use for breeding. Front. in Plant Sci. 7:1787.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Hazzouri, K., Gros-Balthazard, M., Flowers, J., Copetti, D., Lemansour, A., Lebrun, M., et al. (2019). Genome-wide association mapping of date palm fruit traits. Nat. Commun. 10:4680. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12604-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hazzouri, K. M., Flowers, J. M., Visser, H. J., Khierallah, H. S. M., Rosas, U., Pham, G. M., et al. (2015). Whole genome re-sequencing of date palms yields insights into diversification of a fruit tree crop. Nat. Commun. 6:8824. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, M., He, C.-Q., and Ding, N.-Z. (2018). Abiotic stresses: general defenses of land plants and chances for engineering multistress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1771. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Y., Yang, B., He, Y., Zhan, C., Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2019). A quantitative trait locus, qSE3, promotes seed germination and seedling establishment under salinity stress in rice. Plant J. 97, 1089–1104. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, H., Ullah, F., Zhou, D. X., Yi, M., and Zhao, Y. (2019). Mechanisms of ROS Regulation of Plant Development and Stress Responses. Front. Plant Sci. 10:800. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00800

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hussain, N., Al-Rasbi, S., Al-Wahaibi, N. S., Al-Ghanum, G., and El-Sharief Abdalla, O. A. (2012). “Salinity Problems and their management in date palm production,” in Dates: Production, Processing, Food, and Medicinal Value, eds A. Manickavasagan, M. M. Essa, and E. Sukumar (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 442.

Google Scholar

Jaganathan, D., Ramasamy, K., Sellamuthu, G., Jayabalan, S., and Venkataraman, G. (2018). CRISPR for Crop Improvement: an update review. Front. Plant Sci. 9:985. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jain, S. M. (2012). In vitro mutagenesis for improving date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Emir. J. Food Agric. 24, 400–407.

Google Scholar

Jana, G. A., Al Kharusi, L., Sunkar, R., Al-Yahyai, R., and Yaish, M. W. (2019). Metabolomic analysis of date palm seedlings exposed to salinity and silicon treatments. Plant. Signal. Behav. 14:1663112. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2019.1663112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jarvis, P., and Jarvis, M. (2006). The water relations of tree seedlings.: IV. some aspects of the tissue water relations and drought resistance. Physiol. Plant. 16, 501–516. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1963.tb08327.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, H., Orbovic, V., Jones, J. B., and Wang, N. (2016). Modification of the PthA4 effector binding elements in Type I CsLOB1 promoter using Cas9/sgRNA to produce transgenic Duncan grapefruit alleviating XccDpthA4: dCsLOB1.3 infection. Plant Biotech. J. 14, 1291–1301. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12495

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, H., and Wang, N. (2014). Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PLoS One 9:e93806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jochum, M., McWilliams, K., Borrego, E., Kolomiets, M., Niu, G., Pierson, E., et al. (2019a). Bioprospecting plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that mitigate drought stress in grasses. Front. Microbiol.10:2106. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jochum, M., McWilliams, K., Pierson, E., and Jo, Y. K. (2019b). Host-mediated microbiome engineering (HMME) of drought tolerance in the wheat rhizosphere. PLoS One 14:e0225933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, D., Al-Khayri, J., and Jain, S. (2013). Seedling date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L.) as genetic resources. Emir. J. Food Agric. 25, 809–830. doi: 10.9755/ejfa.v25i11.16497

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, P., Garcia, B. J., Furches, A., Tuskan, G. A., and Jacobson, D. (2019). plant host-associated mechanisms for microbial selection. Front. Plant Sci. 10:862. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00862

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kadir, A. P. G., Bahariah, B., Ayub, N. H., Yunus, A. M. M., Rasid, O., Tarmizi, A., et al. (2015). Production of polyhydroxybutyrate in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) mediated by microprojectile bombardment of PHB biosynthesis genes into embryogenic calli. Front. Plant Sci. 6:598. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00598

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanchiswamy, C., Malnoy, M., and Maffei, M. (2015). Chemical diversity of microbial volatiles and their potential for plant growth and productivity. Front. Plant Sci. 6:151. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, M., Asaf, S., Khan, A., Adhikari, A., Jan, R., Ali, S., et al. (2019). Halotolerant rhizobacterial strains mitigate the adverse effects of NaCl stress in soybean seedlings. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 1–15. doi: 10.1155/2019/9530963

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, M. A., and Korban, S. S. (2012). Association mapping in forest trees and fruit crops. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 4045–4060. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khare, E., Mishra, J., and Arora, N. (2018). Multifaceted Interactions between endophytes and plant: developments and prospects. Front. Microbiol. 9:2732. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02732

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Köberl, M., Müller, H., Ramadan, E., and Berg, G. (2011). Desert farming benefits from microbial potential in arid soils and promotes diversity and plant health. PLoS One 6:e24452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024452

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kole, C., Muthamilarasan, M., Henry, R., Edwards, D., Sharma, R., Abberton, M., et al. (2015). Application of genomics-assisted breeding for generation of climate resilient crops: progress and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 6:563. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00563

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Korte, A., and Farlow, A. (2013). The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review. Plant Methods 9:29. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-9-29

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krueger, R. R. (2001). “Date palm germplasm: overview and utilization in the USA,” in Procceeding International Conference on Date Palms, Al-Ain.

Google Scholar

Kumar, K., Amaresan, N., Bhagat, S., Madhuri, K., and Srivastava, R. (2011). Isolation and characterization of rhizobacteria associated with coastal agricultural ecosystem of rhizosphere soils of cultivated vegetable crops. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 27, 1625–1632. doi: 10.1007/s11274-010-0616-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laurens, F., Aranzana, M. J., and Arús, P. (2012). Review of fruit genetics and breeding programmes and a new European initiative to increase fruit breeding efficiency. Acta Hort 2012, 95–102. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2012.929.12

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Libault, M., Pingault, L., Zogli, P., and Schiefelbein, J. (2017). Plant Systems Biology at the Single-Cell Level. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 949–960. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, S., and Trapnell, C. (2016). Single-cell transcriptome sequencing: Recent advances and remaining challenges. F1000Res. 5:F1000. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7223.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maas, E. V., and Grattan, S. R. (1999). “Crop yield as affected by salinity,” in Agronomy Monograph No. 38, eds R. W. Skaggs and J. Van Schilfgaarde Madison, WI., 55–108. doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr38.c3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malash, N., Flowers, T., and Ragab, R. (2008). Effect of irrigation methods, management and salinity of irrigation water on tomato yield, soil moisture and salinity distribution. Irrig. Sci. 26, 313–323. doi: 10.1007/s00271-007-0095-97

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malnoy, M., Viola, R., Jung, M. H., Koo, O. J., Kim, S., Kim, J. S., et al. (2016). DNA-free genetically edited grapevine and apple protoplast using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1904. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mapelli, F., Marasco, R., Rolli, E., Barbato, M., Cherif, H., Guesmi, A., et al. (2013). Potential for plant growth promotion of rhizobacteria associated with Salicornia growing in Tunisian hypersaline soils. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013:248078. doi: 10.1155/2013/248078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marasco, R., Rolli, E., Ettoumi, B., Vigani, G., Mapelli, F., Borin, S., et al. (2012). A drought resistance-promoting microbiome is selected by root system under desert farming. PLoS One 7:e48479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048479

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mathew, L. S., Spannagl, M., Al-Malki, A., George, B., Torres, M. F., Al-Dous, E. K., et al. (2014). A first genetic map of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) reveals long-range genome structure conservation in the palms. BMC Genomics 15:285. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mazri, M. A., and Meziani, R. (2015). Micropropagation of date palm: a review. Cell Dev. Biol. 4, 3. doi: 10.4172/2168-9296.1000160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meddich, A., El Mokhtar, M. A., Bourzik, W., Mitsui, T., Baslam, M., and Hafidi, M. (2018). Optimizing growth and tolerance of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) to drought, salinity, and vascular fusarium-induced wilt (Fusarium oxysporum) by application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Root Biol. 52, 239–258. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75910-4_9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mefteh, F., Daoud, A., Chenari, B. A., Alenezi, F., Luptakova, L., Rateb, M., et al. (2017). Fungal root microbiome from healthy and brittle leaf diseased date palm trees (Phoenix dactylifera L.) reveals a hidden untapped arsenal of antibacterial and broad spectrum antifungal secondary metabolites. Front. Microbiol. 8:307. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00307

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mefteh, F., Daoud, A., Chenari, B. A., Thissera, B., Kadri, Y., Cherif-Silini, H., et al. (2018). Date palm trees root-derived endophytes as fungal cell factories for diverse bioactive metabolites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:E1986. doi: 10.3390/ijms19071986

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Migicovsky, Z., and Myles, S. (2017). Exploiting wild relatives for genomics-assisted breeding of perennial crops. Front. Plant Sci. 8:460. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mosqueira, M. J., Marasco, R., Fusi, M., Michoud, G., Merlino, G., Cherif, A., et al. (2019). Consistent bacterial selection by date palm root system across heterogeneous desert oasis agroecosystems. Sci. Rep. 9:4033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40551-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Müller, H., Schäfer, N., Bauer, H., Geiger, D., Lautner, S., Fromm, J., et al. (2017). The desert plant Phoenix dactylifera closes stomata via nitrate-regulated SLAC1 anion channel. New Phytol. 216, 150–162. doi: 10.1111/nph.14672

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Munné-Bosch, S., and Alegre, L. (2004). Die and let live: leaf senescence contributes to plant survival under drought stress. Funct. Plant Biol. 31, 203–216.

Google Scholar

Munns, R., and Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nishitani, C., Hirai, N., Komori, S., Wada, M., Okada, K., Osakabe, K., et al. (2016). Efficient genome editing in apple using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 6:31481. doi: 10.1038/srep31481

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nixon, R. (1951). The date palm “tree of life” in the subtropical deserts. Econ. Bot. 5, 274–301. doi: 10.1007/bf02985151

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nyouma, A., Bell, J. M., Jacob, F., and Cros, D. (2019). From mass selection to genomic selection: one century of breeding for quantitative yield components of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Tree Genet. Genomes 15:69.

Google Scholar

Orozco-Mosqueda, M. C., Rocha-Granados, M. C., Glick, B. R., and Santoyo, G. (2018). Microbiome engineering to improve biocontrol and plant growth-promoting mechanisms. Microbiol. Res. 208, 25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.micres/2018.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osorio-Guarin, J. A., Garzon-Martinez, G. A., Delgadillo-Duran, P., Bastidas, S., Moreno, L. P., Enciso-Rodriguez, F. E., et al. (2019). Genome-wide association study (GWAS) for morphological and yield-related traits in an oil palm hybrid (Elaeis oleifera x Elaeis guineensis) population. Bmc Plant Biol. 19:533. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2153-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palovaara, J., Saiga, S., Wendrich, J., Hofland, N., Schayck, J., Hater, F., et al. (2017). Transcriptome dynamics revealed by a gene expression atlas of the early Arabidopsis embryo. Nat. Plants 3, 894–904. doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0035-33

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patankar, H. V., Al-Harrasi, I., Al Kharusi, L., Jana, G. A., Al-Yahyai, R., Sunkar, R., et al. (2019a). Overexpression of metallothionein 2A gene from date palm confers abiotic stress tolerance to yeast and Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20:2871. doi: 10.3390/ijms20122871

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patankar, H. V., Al-Harrasi, I., Al-Yahyai, R., and Yaish, M. (2019b). Functional characterization of date palm aquaporin gene PdPIP1;2 confers drought and salinity tolerance to yeast and Arabidopsis. Genes. 10:390. doi: 10.3390/genes10050390

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pitman, M., and Läuchli, A. (2004). “Global impact of salinity and agricultural ecosystems,” in Salinity: Environment - Plants - Molecules, eds A. Läuchli and U. Lüttge (Dordrecht: Springer).

Google Scholar

Prieto, H. (2011). Genetic Transformation Strategies in Fruit Crops. London: IntechOpen.

Google Scholar

Qiu, Z., Egidi, E., Liu, H., Kaur, S., and Singh, B. (2019). New frontiers in agriculture productivity: optimised microbial inoculants and in situ microbiome engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 37:107371. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rabey, H. E., Al-Malki, A., and Abulnaja, K. (2016). Proteome analysis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) under severe drought and salt stress. Int. J. Genom. 2016:7840759.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Radwan, O., Arro, J., Keller, C., and Korban, S. S. (2015). RNA-seq transcriptome analysis in date palm suggests multi-dimensional responses to salinity stress. Trop. Plant Biol. 8, 74–86. doi: 10.1007/s12042-015-9155-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramoliya, P., and Pandey, A. (2003). Soil salinity and water status affect growth of Phoenix dactylifera seedlings. N. Z. J. Crop Horticu. Sci. 31, 345–353.

Google Scholar

Rikek, I., Chaâbene, Z., Kriaa, W., Rorat, A., Franck, V., Hafedh, M., et al. (2019). Transcriptome assembly and abiotic related gene expression analysis of date palm reveal candidate genes involved in response to cadmium stress. Compa. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 225:108569. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.108569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roca, A., Pizarro-Tobías, P., Udaondo, Z., Fernández, M., Matilla, M., Molina-Henares, M., et al. (2012). Analysis of the plant growth-promoting properties encoded by the genome of the rhizobacterium 601 Pseudomonas putida BIRD-1. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 780–794.

Google Scholar

Rolli, E., Marasco, R., Vigani, G., Ettoumi, B., Mapelli, F., Deangelis, M., et al. (2014). Improved plant resistance to drought is promoted by the root-associated microbiome as a water stress-dependent trait. 604. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 316–331. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Romero Navarro, J., Willcox, M., Burgueño, J., Romay, C., Swarts, K., Trachsel, S., et al. (2017). A study of allelic diversity underlying flowering-time adaptation in maize landraces. Nat. Genet. 49, 476–480. doi: 10.1038/ng.3784

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Safronov, O., Kreuzwieser, J., Haberer, G., Alyousif, M., Schulze, W., Al-Harbi, N., et al. (2017). Detecting early signs of heat and drought stress in Phoenix dactylifera (date palm). PLoS One 12:e0177883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sahi, C., Singh, A., Kumar, K., Blumwald, E., and Grover, A. (2006). Salt stress response in rice: genetics, molecular biology, and comparative genomics. Funct. Integr. Genomics 6, 263–284. doi: 10.1007/s10142-006-0032-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sané, D., Kneyta, M., Diouf, D., Diouf, D., Badiane, F., Sagna, M., et al. (2005). Growth and development 608 of date palm (Phśnix dactylifera L.) seedlings under drought and salinity stresses. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4, 968–972.

Google Scholar

Sasse, J., Martinoia, E., and Northen, T. (2018). Feed your friends: do plant exudates shape the root microbiome? Trends Plant Sci. 23, 25–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sattar, M. N., Iqbal, Z., Tahir, M. N., Shahid, M. S., Abdullatif, M. K., Al-Khateeb, A., et al. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9: a practical approach in date palm genome editing. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1469. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sessitsch, A., Hardoim, P., Döring, J., Weilharter, A., Krause, A., Woyke, T., et al. (2012). Functional Characteristics Of An Endophyte Community Colonizing Rice Roots As Revealed By Metagenomic Analysis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 25, 28–36. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-08-11-0204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shulse, C., Cole, B., Ciobanu, D., Lin, J., Yoshinaga, Y., Gouran, M., et al. (2019). High-throughput single-cell transcriptome profiling of plant cell types. Cell Rep. 27, 2241.e–2247.e. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Skz, A., Sandhya, V. D., and Linga, V. (2013). Isolation and characterization of drought-tolerant ACC deaminase and exopolysaccharide-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. Anna. Microbiol. 64, 1–10.

Google Scholar

Sudhersan, C., Al-Shayji, Y., and Manuel, S. (2009). Date palm crop improvement via T x D hybridization integrated with in vitro culture technique. Acta Hortic. 829, 219–224. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2009.829.31

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Timm, C., Carter, K., Carrell, A., Jun, S. R., Jawdy, S., Velez, J., et al. (2018). Abiotic stresses shift belowground populus -associated bacteria toward a core stress microbiome. mSystems 3:e00070-17. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00070-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tripler, E., Ben-Gal, A., and Shani, U. (2007). Consequence of salinity and excess boron on growth, evapotranspiration and ion uptake in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L., cv. Medjool). Plant Soil 297, 147–155. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9328-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tripler, E., Shani, U., Mualem, Y., and Ben-Gal, A. (2011). Long-term growth, water consumption and yield of date palm as a function of salinity. Agric. Water Manag. 99, 128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.06.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waltz, E. (2015). Nonbrowning GM apple cleared for market. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 326–327. doi: 10.1038/nbt0415-326c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Xu, X., Vieira, F. G., Xiao, Y., Li, Z., Wang, J., et al. (2016). The power of inbreeding: NGS-based GWAS of rice reveals convergent evolution during rice domestication. Mol. Plant 9, 975–985. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.04.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, T., Zhang, H., and Zhu, H. (2019). CRISPR technology is revolutionizing the improvement of tomato and other fruit crops. Hortic. Res. 6:77. doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0159-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Whitaker, B. K., Reynolds, H. L., and Clay, K. (2018). Foliar fungal endophyte communities are structured by environment but not host ecotype in Panicum virgudum (switchgrass). Ecology 99, 2703–2711. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2543

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wickens, G. (1998). Ecophysiology of Economic Plants in Arid and Semi-Arid Lands. Berlin: Springer, 1–271.

Google Scholar

Wu, S., Yang, J., Huang, Y., Li, Y., Yin, T., Wullschleger, S. D., et al. (2010). An improved approach for mapping quantitative trait loci in a pseudo-testcross: revisiting a poplar mapping study. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2010, 1–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Xiao, T. T., Raygoza, A. A., Pérez, J. C., Kirschner, G., Deng, Y., Atkinson, B., et al. (2019). Emergent protective organogenesis in date palms: a morpho-devo-dynamic adaptive strategy during early development. Plant Cell 31, 1751–1766. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yaish, M., Al-Lawati, A., Jana, G., Patankar, H., and Glick, B. (2016). Impact of soil salinity on the structure of the bacterial endophytic community identified from the roots of caliph medic (Medicago truncatula). PLoS One 11:e0159007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yaish, M. W. (2015). Proline accumulation is a general response to abiotic stress in the date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Genet. Mol. Res. 14, 9943–9950. doi: 10.4238/2015.August.19.30

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yaish, M. W., Antony, I., and Glick, B. (2015a). Isolation and characterization of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacteria from date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.) and their potential role in salinity tolerance. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 107, 1519–1532. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0445-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yaish, M. W., and Kumar, P. (2015). Salt tolerance research in date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Past, present and future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 6:348. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00348Google Scholar

Yaish, M. W., Patankar, H. V., Assaha, D. V. M., Zheng, Y., Al-Yahyai, R., and Sunkar, R. (2017). Genome-wide expression profiling in leaves and roots of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) exposed to salinity. BMC Genomics 18:246. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3633-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yaish, M. W., Sunkar, R., Zheng, Y., Ji, B., Al-Yahyai, R., and Farooq, S. A. (2015b). A genome-wide identification of the miRNAome in response to salinity stress in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Front. Plant Sci. 6:946. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00946

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, J., Wu, Y., He, Z., Li, M., Zhu, K., and Gao, B. (2018). Diversity and antifungal activity of endophytic fungi associated with Camellia oleifera. Mycobiology 46, 1–7. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2018.1454008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zaid, A., and de Wet, P. F. (2002). Pollination and bunch management. Date Palm Cultivation 1, 145–175.

Google Scholar

Zhu, J. K. (2003). Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 441–445. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00085-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: date palm, abiotic stress, omics, desert microbiome, genetic transformation, breeding program

Citation: Hazzouri KM, Flowers JM, Nelson D, Lemansour A, Masmoudi K and Amiri KMA (2020) Prospects for the Study and Improvement of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Date Palms in the Post-genomics Era. Front. Plant Sci. 11:293. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00293

Received: 17 November 2019; Accepted: 26 February 2020;
Published: 17 March 2020.

Edited by:

Randy D. Allen, Oklahoma State University, United States

Reviewed by:

Mahmoud Yaish, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman
Eleonora Rolli, University of Milan, Italy

Copyright © 2020 Hazzouri, Flowers, Nelson, Lemansour, Masmoudi and Amiri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Khaled Masmoudi, khaledmasmoudi@uaeu.ac.ae; Khaled M. A. Amiri, k.amiri@uaeu.ac.ae

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.