Effect of Light/Dark Cycle on Photosynthetic Pathway Switching and CO2 Absorption in Two Dendrobium Species

Many Dendrobium species are both ornamental and medicinal plants in China. Several wild species have been exploited to near extinction, and facility cultivation has become an important way to meet the great market demand. Most Dendrobium species have evolved into crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) pathways in adapting to harsh epiphytic environment, leading to low daily net CO₂ absorption. Photosynthetic pathways of many facultative CAM plants are regulated by various environmental factors. Light/dark cycle plays an important role in regulating the photosynthetic pathway of several CAM species. The aims of this study were to investigate whether the photosynthetic pathway of Dendrobium species could be regulated between C3 and CAM by changing light/dark cycles and the daily net CO₂ absorption could be enhanced by shortening light/dark cycle. In this study, net CO₂ exchange rates of D. officinale and D. primulinum were monitored continuously during two different light/dark cycles conversion compared to Kalanchoe daigremontiana as an obligate CAM plant. The net CO₂ exchange pattern and stomatal behavior of D. officinale and D. primulinum were switched from CAM to C3-like by changing the light/dark cycle from 12/12 h to 4/4 h. However, this switching was not completely reversible. Compared to the original 12/12 h light/dark cycle, the dark, light, and daily net CO₂ exchange amount of D. officinale were significantly increased after the light/dark cycle was changed from 4/4 h to 12/12 h, but those in D. primulinum was opposite and those in K. daigremontiana was not affected. Daily net CO₂ exchange amount of D. officinale increased by 47% after the light/dark cycle was changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h, due to the sharp increase of light net CO₂ exchange amount. However, the large decrease of dark net CO₂ exchange amount could not be offset by increased light net CO₂ exchange amount, leading to reduced daily net CO₂ exchange amount of D. primulinum. In conclusion, the 4/4 h light/dark cycle can induce the photosynthetic pathway of D. officinale and D. primulinum to C3-like, and improve the daily CO₂ absorption of D. officinale.

Introduction

Dendrobium is the second largest genus of Orchidaceae (Takamiya et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2015). Many Dendrobium species not only have important ornamental values but also possess high medicinal values in China (Ng et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2015; Teixeira Da Silva et al., 2016). Many wild species are endangered due to the exploitation, and facility cultivation has become an important way to meet the great market demand of Dendrobium. However, most Dendrobium species have evolved into crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) pathways in adapting to harsh epiphytic environment, and their photosynthetic pathways also vary with the environment and species (Gehrig et al., 2001; Su and Zhang, 2003; Yang et al., 2011; Ren and Bai, 2015). For instance, Su and Zhang (2003) measured the daily changes of net CO₂ exchange rates of D. officinale under various weather conditions and found that it had a CAM pattern on sunny days, a C3 pattern on rainy days, and a pattern between CAM and C3 on cloudy days. Yang reported that diurnal net CO₂ exchange rates in D. primulinum had four distinct phases of 24-h CAM cycle (Yang et al., 2011). More and more Dendrobium plants have been found to have CAM pathway to some extent.

It is widely assumed that the very earliest evolution of CAM was driven by low ambient atmospheric CO₂, then the requirement of economic water use for terrestrial CAM plants (Flexas et al., 2012). CAM is found in about 6% of vascular plants species spanning 35 plant families as an adaption to water deficit (Silvera et al., 2010). CAM is an important ecophysiological metabolic adaption that permits plants to occupy extremely arid environments (e.g., deserts), semi-arid regions with seasonal water availability (e.g., Mediterranean climates), or habitats with intermittent water supply (e.g., tropical epiphytic habitats) (Cushman, 2001). CAM is often described as a continuum, with constitute CAM at one end, C3 at the other, and various facultative CAM between (Winter et al., 2015; Winter, 2019). Constitutive CAM species undergo a one-way developmental progression to CAM and maintain CAM even under well-watered conditions (Winter et al., 2008). Facultative CAM describes the optional use of CAM photosynthesis in plants that otherwise employ C3 or C4 photosynthesis; reversibility distinguishes facultative CAM from ontogenetically programmed unidirectional C3-to-CAM shifts inherent in constitutive CAM plants (Winter and Holtum, 2014).

Photosynthetic pathways of many facultative CAM species are influenced by several environmental factors such as soil water content and light intensity, as well as photoperiod (Brulfert et al., 1996; Mattos and Lüttge, 2001; Brilhaus et al., 2016;). CAM and C3-like pathway of Kalanchoe blossfeldiana can be induced by short light period and short light period with interruption of long dark period respectively, and phytochrome is involved in these processes (Schmitz, 1951; Gregory and Thimann, 1954; Wilkins, 1962; Queiroz and Morel, 1974). Studies on the effects of D. ekapol showed that short light period increased the net CO₂ absorption of phase I (dark period), while long light period increased the net CO₂ absorption of phase II (early stage of light period) and phase IV (at the end of light period) (Sekizuka et al., 1995). The CAM pathway and CO₂ uptake of Doritaenopsis Queen Beer “Mantefon” can both be restrained by short light/dark cycle (Kim et al., 2017). Under the normal 12/12 h light/dark cycle, CAM and C3 pathways coexist in D. officinale, whereas C3 pathway can be upregulated by short light/dark cycle (short light period and short dark period), especially extreme treatment of 4/4 h light/dark cycle can lead to C3-like light-only CO₂ uptake pattern (Zhang et al., 2014). However, it was not clear whether stomatal movement was involved or whether photosynthetic pathway switching was reversible between light/dark cycles of 12/12 h and 4/4 h.

For a long time, both C3 and CAM stomatal movements have been associated with the perception of CO₂ concentration; intuitively, the response to partial pressure of CO₂ in the substomatal cavities (Ci) seems to be the most likely signal to regulate the inverse stomatal cycle associated with CAM (Males and Griffiths, 2017). At the beginning of phase I of CAM, stomatal opening was considered to be caused by the decrease of Ci with the increase of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) activity at dusk (Griffiths et al., 2007; Caemmerer and Griffiths, 2009). In the morning, stored malic acid is decarboxylated in phase II, which strengthens stomatal closure. This, coupled with respiration, can lead to 100 times atmospheric concentration in Ci. The phase IV of reopening stomata is related to the end of malic acid decomposition, therefore, internal CO₂ limitation (Cockburn, 1979). When CO₂ uptake and malic acid accumulation decreased at night and subsequent Ci regeneration decreased at phase III, stomata remained closed, and there was almost no transient response to CO₂, suggesting that circadian control of stomata was still a key factor in controlling CAM cycles of Kalanchoe daigremontiana and K. pinnata (Caemmerer and Griffiths, 2009). Studies on facultative CAM plants show that blue light can regulate stomatal conductance opening only in C3 mode (Lee and Assmann, 1992; Tallman et al., 1997).

This study aimed to investigate whether photosynthetic pathway of Dendrobium plants could be switched between CAM and C3, and the daily net CO₂ absorption could be increased by different light/dark cycles conversion. The results of this study may help researchers better understand the relationship between light/dark cycle, stomatal behavior, and CO₂ absorption in different CAM plants.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Materials and Cultivation Methods

Dendrobium officinale collected from Jinhua city (Zhejiang, China) and D. primulinum collected from Puer city (Yunnan, China) were cultivated and acclimatized in a walk-in phytotron at China Agricultural University (Beijing, China) for 2 years. K. daigremontiana, an obligate CAM plant, used as a reference, was grown from leaf-borne ramets in the same walk-in phytotron. The two Dendrobium species and K. daigremontiana were planted in 0.4 L plastic pots, three plants per pot. The cultivation substrate was moss for these two Dendrobium species, and a mixture of vermiculite and perlite (volume ratio was 3:1) for K. daigremontiana. All pots were irrigated with 70 ml tap water every 2 days, and irrigated with the same amount of nutrient solution every 7 days for 2 years. Nutrient solution formula was as follows: Ca(NO₃)₂•4H₂O 205 mg L⁻¹, MgSO₄•7H₂O 60 mg L⁻¹, KH₂PO₄ 136 mg L⁻¹, NH₄NO₃ 80 mg L⁻¹, MnSO₄•H₂O 3.6 mg L⁻¹, H₃BO₃ 2.7 mg L⁻¹, FeSO₄•7H₂O 13.4 mg L⁻¹, CuSO₄•5H₂O 0.1 mg L⁻¹, ZnSO₄•7H₂O 0.4 mg L⁻¹, and (NH₄)₆Mo₇O₂₄•4H₂O 0.1 mg L⁻¹. EC and pH of the nutrient solution were controlled at 0.6–0.7 ms cm⁻¹ and 6.0–6.5, respectively. The environmental parameters of the phytotron for 2 years of long-term cultivation were as follows: artificial light source was T5 tricolor fluorescent lamp (28 W, Beijing Lighting Valley Co., Ltd., Beijing, China); the photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) at the plant canopy was 150 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹; light/dark cycle was 12/12 h (light period, 0800–2000 hours; dark period, 2000–0800 hours); temperature during the light and dark periods was 26°C ± 1 and 22°C ± 1°C, respectively; relative humidity was 65% ± 5%; CO₂ concentration was 500 ± 50 μmol mol⁻¹.

Light/Dark Cycle Treatment

Different light/dark cycle treatments began after acclimatization in the environment of phytotron for 3 months, when both D. officinale and D. primulinum plants had 8–10 expanded leaves, and K. daigremontiana plants had 16 expanded leaves. All the plants used in this experiment were in a vegetative stage when they were subjected to different light/dark cycle treatments. Twelve similar-sized healthy plants were selected from each species treating with a light/dark cycle of 12/12 h (light period, 0800–2000 hours; dark period, 2000–0800 hours) for five cycles (5 days). At the end of the fifth dark period, the light/dark cycle was changed to 4/4 h for 15 cycles (5 days). After the 15th dark period (the end of the fifth day), the light/dark cycle was changed back to 12/12 h for another five cycles (5 days) as mentioned above. The light intensity, temperature, relative humidity, and CO₂ concentration during the light/dark cycle treatment were maintained at the same levels as mentioned above.

Measurement of Net CO₂ Exchange Rates, Dark, Light, and Daily Net CO₂ Exchange Amount, and Dark Net CO₂ Exchange Percentage

The photosynthetic continuous measurement system (Zhang et al., 2014) used in this study consists of four cuvettes (25 cm × 15 cm × 6 cm), a host computer, and an IRGA CO₂ analyzer (LI-7000, LICOR, Lincoln, USA). One shoot of D. officinale and one shoot of D. primulinum, each with 8–10 leaves, as well as two fully expanded mature leaves from two different K. daigremontiana plants were selected for this measurement. Each of the four different samples was enclosed into each of the different cuvettes. All leaves were held flat by several horizontal nylon wires. All plants were kept intact and irrigated with 70 ml tap water once a day during the measurement. The measurement was repeated for three times. The temperature and relative humidity of the cuvettes was the same level as that of the phytotron as mentioned above. PPFD at the top of the cuvettes was 150 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹. The air flow rate of each cuvette was 1.0 L min⁻¹. The difference of CO₂ concentration between reference and sample gas of each cuvette recorded every 10 min throughout the treatment period. The measurements for these three species were carried out concurrently. Leaf area of each cuvette was determined according to Yang et al. (2002) after 15 days. Then net CO₂ exchange rate of each cuvette was calculated according to Zhang et al. (2014). Dark net CO₂ exchange amount, light net CO₂ exchange amount, and daily net CO₂ exchange amount were integrated based on dark, light, and daily net CO₂ exchange rates everyday (24 h). The dark net CO₂ exchange percentage was defined as dark net CO₂ exchange amount divided by daily net CO₂ exchange amount times 100%. Dark, light, and daily net CO₂ exchange amount, as well as dark net CO₂ exchange percentage measurement data for these three species were collected at the last 2 days of each light/dark cycle (days 4 and 5, days 9 and 10, days 14 and 15). Three replicates were conducted in this measurement for each species.

Measurement of Stomatal Conductance

A leaf porometer (SC-1, Decagon, Washington, USA) was used to measure the stomatal conductance of abaxial surface of the leaves of other plants outside the cuvettes for D. officinale, D. primulinum, and K. daigremontiana. Daily desiccant replacement and the leaf porometer calibration were done before the measurement. Automatic mode was used to obtain each value in 30 s. Measurements were conducted at 0700, 0900, 1,300, 1,600, 1900, 2100, and 2300 hours on day 5 (0700, 2100, and 2300 hours were in dark period), and at 0200, 0600, 1000, 1400, 1800, and 2,200 hours on day 9 (0600, 1400, and 2200 hours were in dark period). Four plants per species were measured at each time. The stomatal conductance were measured for the third leaf from top of each plant (n = 4).

Statistical Analysis

Statistics analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 21 (IBM, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). The average dark, light, and daily net CO₂ exchange amount, as well as dark net CO₂ exchange percentage for each species (D. officinale, D. primulinum, and K. daigremontiana) were compared respectively between different light/dark cycles by Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05. The average stomatal conductances at each time of day 5 and day 9 were compared for each species by the same method as mentioned above, respectively.

Results

Net CO₂ Exchange Rates

The net CO₂ exchange exhibited obvious trailing phenomenon during the conversion between the light and dark period. Thus its influence had been considered in the subsequent results analysis. When light/dark cycle was 12/12 h, net CO₂ exchange rates of D. officinale, D. primulinum, and K. daigremontiana exhibited multiple periodic variations. The net CO₂ exchange rates of D. officinale, D. primulinum, and K. daigremontiana increased successively after onset of the dark period. When switched to light period, the net CO₂ exchange rate of K. daigremontiana first rose to the peak and then fell to near zero at 0900 hours; that of D. officinale and D. primulinum first increased and then decreased until 1600 hours before falling to near zero. The net CO₂ exchange rates of D. officinale exhibited the shortest time of fluctuation around zero, followed by D. primulinum, that of K. daigremontiana exhibited the longest duration near zero. The net CO₂ exchange rates of all these three species would rise at the end of the light period (Figure 1A). After light/dark cycle was changed to 4/4 h for 3 days (on day 9), net CO₂ exchange of D. officinale and D. primulinum showed C3-like pattern, with net CO₂ uptake in light period and net CO₂ release in dark period, whereas net CO₂ uptake in dark period maintained in K. daigremontiana. Net CO₂ exchange rate of K. daigremontiana at 0200 hours was higher than that at 1000 and 1800 hours (Figure 1B). After the light/dark cycle was changed back to 12/12 h for 1 day, net CO₂ exchange of these three species also switched back to the similar pattern of earlier light/dark cycle of 12/12 h (Figure 1C).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Effect of light/dark cycle on net CO₂ exchange rates of D. officinale, D. primulinum, and K. daigremontiana. Light/dark cycle was 12/12 h from day 1 to day 5 (A), 4/4 h from day 6 to day 10 (B), and 12/12 h from day 11 to day 15 (C). The thin black line on the horizontal axis indicates light period, and the thick black line indicates dark period.

Dark, Light, and Daily Net CO₂ Exchange Amount

For D. officinale, daily net CO₂ exchange amount increased significantly from 47 to 69 mmol m⁻² day⁻¹ and then further increased significantly to 85 mmol m⁻² day⁻¹ when the light/dark cycle was changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h and then back to 12/12 h (Figure 2A). After the light/dark cycle was changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h, the increase of daily net CO₂ exchange amount mainly resulted from the increase of light net CO₂ exchange amount. Compared to 4/4 h light/dark cycle, daily net CO₂ exchange amount significantly increased after light/dark cycle was changed to 12/12 h, due to the increase of dark net CO₂ exchange amount was more than the decrease of light net CO₂ exchange amount. Compared to the previous 12/12 h light/dark cycle, daily net CO₂ exchange amount significantly increased after light/dark cycle was changed back to 12/12 h, due to both the increase of light net CO₂ exchange amount and dark net CO₂ exchange amount.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Effect of light/dark cycle on dark net CO₂ exchange amount, light net CO₂ exchange amount, and daily net CO₂ exchange amount of D. officinale (A), D. primulinum (B), and K. daigremontiana (C). Daily net CO₂ exchange amount is the sum of dark net CO₂ exchange amount and light net CO₂ exchange amount. Each point is the mean of three measurements of three different plants. Vertical bars indicate the standard deviations. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). The data of the last 2 days of each light/dark cycle of three repeated experiments were taken to average. The letters underlined by dotted line and solid line represent differences in the light net CO₂ exchange amount and dark net CO₂ exchange amount respectively.

For D. primulinum, daily net CO₂ exchange amount decreased significantly from 76 to 40 mmol m⁻² day⁻¹ and then remained no significantly changed when the light/dark cycle was changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h then back to 12/12 h (Figure 2B). After the light/dark cycle was changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h, the decrease in daily net CO₂ exchange amount mainly resulted from the large decrease of dark net CO₂ exchange amount, which offset against the increase of light net CO₂ exchange amount. Compared to 4/4 h light/dark cycle, there was no significant change in daily net CO₂ exchange amount after the light/dark cycle was changed to 12/12 h. During this light/dark cycle switch, the increase of dark net CO₂ exchange amount was offset by the decrease of light net CO₂ exchange amount. Compared to the previous 12/12 h light/dark cycle, daily net CO₂ exchange amount significantly decreased after light/dark cycle was changed back to 12/12 h, due to the decrease of both light net CO₂ exchange amount and dark net CO₂ exchange amount.

For K. daigremontiana, there were no significant changes in daily net CO₂ exchange amount during the conversion of different light/dark cycles (Figure 2C). Compared to 12/12 h light/dark cycle, the daily net CO₂ exchange amount did not change significantly after the light/dark cycle was changed from 12h/12 h to 4/4 h. During this light/dark cycle switch, the increase of light net CO₂ exchange amount was almost equivalent to the decrease of dark net CO₂ exchange amount. Compared to the previous 12/12 h light/dark cycle there was no significant change in daily net CO₂ exchange amount when light/dark cycle was changed back to 12/12 h, due to no significant change in light and dark net CO₂ exchange amount.

Dark Net CO₂ Exchange Percentage

The dark net CO₂ exchange percentage of D. officinale, D. primulinum, and K. daigremontiana showed an increasing trend during 12/12 h light/dark cycle (Table 1). When the light/dark cycle was changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h and then back to 12/12 h, the dark net CO₂ exchange percentage of D. officinale and D. primulinum changed from a positive value to a negative value and then back to a positive value. Compared to that of the original 12/12 h light/dark cycle, the positive value was significantly decreased for these two Dendrobium species after the light/dark cycle was changed back to 12/12 h light/dark cycle from 4/4 h. The dark net CO₂ exchange percentage of K. daigremontiana always remained positive and showed a trend of decreasing first and then increasing during the different light/dark cycles conversion. For K. daigremontiana, there was no significant difference in the dark net CO₂ percentage of 12/12 h light/dark cycle before (85.5%) and after (91.3%) 4/4 h light/dark cycle.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Effect of light/dark cycle on dark net CO2 exchange percentage of D. officinale, D. primulinum, and K. daigremontiana.

Stomatal Conductance

Statistically, there was a significant decline in stomatal conductance of D. officinale (Figure 3A), D. primulinum (Figure 3B), and K. daigremontiana (Figure 3C) from 0700 (dark period) to 1300 hours (light period); however, stomatal conductance of all these three species increased significantly from 1300 to 1600 hours during the light period of the 12/12 h light/dark cycle. After light/dark cycle was changed to 4/4 h for 3 days (day 9), the stomatal conductance of D. officinale decreased in the dark period and increased in the light period significantly. Although the stomatal behavior of D. primulinum exhibited the similar pattern as those of D. officinale, the amplitude was much smaller. For K. daigremontiana, it showed a gradual decrease in the stomatal conductance from 0200 (light period) to 2200 hours (dark period) 3 days after changing the light/dark cycle from 12/12 h to 4/4 h. Compared to the previous 12/12 h light/dark cycle. After light/dark cycle was changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h, for D. officinale and D. primulinum, stomatal conductance of the light period significantly increased, whereas it was not affected for K. daigremontiana.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Effect of light/dark cycle on stomatal conductance of D. officinale (A), D. primulinum (B), and K. daigremontiana (C). Data were randomly collected from four plants on day 3 and day 9, respectively (mean ± SD, n = 4 for each of these 2 days). The thin black line and thick black line on top indicate light period and dark period of 12/12 h light/dark cycle, respectively. The thin black line and thick black line on the bottom horizontal axis indicate light period and dark period of 4/4 h light/dark cycle respectively. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). The underlined letters represent differences in 4/4 h light/dark cycle.

Discussion

Effect of Light/Dark Cycle on Net CO₂ Exchange Pattern and Stomatal Behaviors

Based on the percentage of daily carbon gained by dark fixation, different extent of CAM plants could be easily distinguished (Winter and Holtum, 2002; Zhang et al., 2014; Winter, 2019). Therefore, D. officinale was identified as a C3-CAM plant, whereas D. primulinum was a CAM plant between the C3-CAM and full CAM. After the light/dark cycle was changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h for 3 days, net CO₂ exchange pattern of D. officinale and D. primulinum switched from CAM defined by Osmond (1978) to C3-like (net CO₂ uptake in the light and net CO₂ release in the dark, Figure 1). Stomatal behavior of these two Dendrobium species also switched from the CAM pattern to the C3-like pattern (increasing in light period and decreasing in dark period, Figure 3). Tallman (2004) suggested that in phase III of CAM, the photosynthesis of guard cells can obtain a large amount of CO₂ from the mesophyll and build a strong sink for NADPH, thereby inhibiting the degradation of endogenous ABA in guard cells and promoting stomatal closure (Lind et al., 2015). Therefore, it can be speculated that when the dark CO₂ absorption decreases to a certain extent, the mesophyll cells will not have enough CO₂ supply to the guard cells in the light period, so as not to inhibit the opening of the stomata. Some studies related to facultative CAM plants have concluded that light regulates stomatal conductance of these plants only when they are in C3 pattern (Lee and Assmann, 1992; Tallman et al., 1997). Our results were consistent with these previous studies. Net CO₂ uptake in dark period generally existed in K. daigremontiana regardless of light/dark cycle (Figure 2C). However, there were no significant changes in the stomatal conductance during both dark and light periods from 0600 to 2200 hours after changing the light/dark cycle from 12/12 h to 4/4 h (Figure 3). Dark CO₂ fixation was almost exclusively catalyzed by PEPC in CAM species. The allosteric performance of PEPC was regulated posttranslationally by a circadian clock controlled protein kinase called phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase (PPCK) (Nimmo et al., 1984, 1986, 1987; Hartwell et al., 1999; Owen and Griffiths, 2013; Boxall et al., 2017; Ohara and Satake, 2017). The activity of PPCK of Bryophyllum fedtschenkoi reach appeared several hours after the onset of darkness (Carter et al., 1991). It was possible that when the dark period was too short, the activities of PPCK might not be high enough, which might inhibit the dark net CO₂ fixation in D. officinale, D. primulinum, and K. daigremontiana to different extents (Figure 2). However, this study did not measure the activity of PPCK of these three species during the conversion of different light/dark cycles, which needs to be studied further in the future.

After the light/dark cycle was changed back to 12/12 h light/dark cycle, dark net CO₂ exchange percentage of two Dendrobium species decreased significantly compared to the original 12/12 h light/dark cycle, but that of K. daigremontiana did not (Table 1). However, it did not imply that the 4/4 h light/dark cycle induction suppressed the CAM activity of D. officinale. Compared to the original 12/12 h light/dark cycle, dark net CO₂ exchange amount increased significantly for D. officinale after the light/dark cycle was changed back to 12/12 h (Figure 2A).

CO₂ Absorption and Stomatal Behaviors

After the light/dark cycle was changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h, daily net CO₂ exchange amount increased by 47% for D. officinale (Figure 2A). It might be due to the fact that sharp increased stomatal conductance (Figure 3) were favorable to the diffusion of CO₂ into the leaf, eventually promoting the CO₂ absorption during the light period of 4/4 h light/dark cycle. After the light/dark cycle was changed from 4/4 h back to 12/12 h, daily net CO₂ exchange amount of D. officinale reached a higher value compared to 4/4 h light/dark cycle (Figure 2A) due to a little down regulation of C3 activity (represented by light net CO₂ exchange amount) and large up regulation of CAM activity (represented by dark net CO₂ exchange amount). However, for D. primulinum, the daily net CO₂ exchange amount decreased by 38% after the light/dark cycle was changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h (Figure 2B), it was possibly due to the fact that its stomatal conductance increased much less than that of D. officinale limited the diffusion of CO₂ into the leaf (Evans and Loreto, 2000), eventually inhibiting the substantial increase of CO₂ absorption during the light period of 4/4 h light/dark cycle. The contrary responses of daily net CO₂ exchange amount of D. officinale and D. primulinum on 4/4 h light/dark cycle may also be related to their different mesophyll conductance (g_m). A strong correlation has been found between g_m and photosynthetic capacity in two species of Orchidaceae, and g_m was mainly determined by surface area of mesophyll cells, chloroplasts exposed to intercellular airspace per unit of leaf area and cell wall thickness (Yang et al., 2018). Reduced intercellular air space (IAS) and reduced surface of mesophyll exposed to IAS (L_mes/area) were positively related to CAM function, and negatively related to C3 function (Nelson and Sage, 2008). Structure features of leaf may affect CO₂ concentration in chloroplast stroma (Terashima et al., 2011). It was reported that increased O₂/CO₂ eventually increased photorespiration. Photorespiration had an especially high demand for energy (Osmond and Grace, 1995; Heber et al., 2001; Heber, 2002). After the light/dark cycle changed from 12/12 h to 4/4 h, the daily net CO₂ exchange amount of D. primulinum decreased significantly, which suggested that D. primulinum might subject to severe photorespiration during the light period of 4/4 h light/dark cycle. Therefore, the changes of daily net CO₂ exchange amount of D. officinale and D. primulinum were reversed after the photosynthetic pathway was switched from CAM to C3. This may be related to stomatal conductivity, g_m, cell wall conductance, cytosol conductance, stromal conductance, etc., which require further study to clarify the relationship between leaf functional structure and photosynthesis of Dendrobium plants.

Conclusions

The responses of gas exchange and stomatal movement of two Dendrobium species to different light/dark cycles conversion were evaluated in this study. The net CO₂ exchange pattern and stomatal behavior of D. officinale and D. primulinum could be switched from CAM to C3-like by changing the light/dark cycle from 12/12 h to 4/4 h. However, this switching was not completely reversible as the dark, light, and daily net CO₂ exchange amount of D. officinale were significantly increased after the light/dark cycle was changed from 4/4 h to 12/12 h compared to the original 12/12 h light/dark cycle. The responses of D. primulinum to different light/dark cycle conversion were opposite from those of D. officinale. The net CO₂ uptake during the dark period was always present in K. daigremontiana regardless of light/dark cycle.

Daily net CO₂ exchange amount of D. officinale was enhanced by changing the light/dark cycle from 12/12 h to 4/4 h, but that of D. primulinum was inhibited. The daily net CO₂ exchange amount of K. daigremontiana was not affected by different light/dark cycles conversion.

Author Contributions

YC carried out the experiments and wrote the manuscript. DH and RG designed the experiments and participated in the statistical data evaluation. JH and GN reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31372089) and National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB0403901).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Fang Ji (International Journal of Agricultural Biological Engineering) for guidance in this manuscript writing.

References

Boxall, S. F., Dever, L. V., Knerova, J., Gould, P. D., and Hartwell, J. (2017). Phosphorylation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase is essential for maximal and sustained dark CO₂ fixation and core circadian clock operation in the obligate crassulacean acid metabolism species Kalanchoe fedtschenkoi. Plant Cell 29, 2519–2536. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00301

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brilhaus, D., Bräutigam, A., Mettleraltmann, T., Winter, K., and Weber, A. P. (2016). Reversible burst of transcriptional changes during induction of crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) in Talinum triangulare. Plant Physiol. 170, 102–122. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01076

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brulfert, J., Ravelomanana, D., Guclu, S., and Kluge, M. (1996). Ecophysiological studies in Kalanchoe porphyrocalyx and K-miniata, two species performing highly flexible CAM. Photosynth. Res. 49, 29–36. doi: 10.1007/BF00029425

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caemmerer, S. V., and Griffiths, H. (2009). Stomatal responses to CO₂ during a diel crassulacean acid metabolism cycle in Kalanchoe daigremontiana and Kalanchoe pinnata. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 567–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01951.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carter, P. J., Nimmo, H. G., Fewson, C. A., and Wilkins, M. B. (1991). Circadian rhythms in the activity of a plant protein kinase. EMBO J. 10, 2063–2068. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07737.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cockburn, W. (1979). Relationships between stomatal behavior and internal carbon dioxide concentration in crassulacean acid metabolism plants. Plant Physiol. 63, 1029–1032. doi: 10.1104/pp.63.6.1029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cushman, J. C. (2001). Crassulacean acid metabolism. A plastic photosynthetic adaptation to arid environments. Plant Physiol. 127, 1439–1448. doi: 10.1104/pp.010818

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Evans, J. R., and Loreto, F. (2000). “Acquisition and diffusion of CO₂ in higher plant leaves” in Photosynthesis: Physiology and metabolism. eds. R. C. Leegood, T. D. Sharkey, and S. V. Caemmerer (Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Academy Press), 321–351.

Google Scholar

Flexas, J., Loreto, F., and Medrano, H. (2012). “Ecophysiology of CAM photosynthesis” in Terrestrial photosynthesis in a changing environment. eds. J. Flexas, F. Loreto, and H. Medrano (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 71–84.

Google Scholar

Gehrig, H., Heute, V., and Kluge, M. (2001). New partial sequences of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase as molecular phylogenetic markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20, 262–274. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.0973

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gregory, F. G., and Thimann, K. V. (1954). The interrelation between CO₂ metabolism and photoperiodism in Kalanchoë. Plant Physiol. 29, 220–229. doi: 10.1104/pp.29.3.220

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Griffiths, H., Cousins, A. B., Badger, M. R., and Caemmerer, S. V. (2007). Discrimination in the dark. Resolving the interplay between metabolic and physical constraints to phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase activity during the crassulacean acid metabolism cycle. Plant Physiol. 143, 1055–1067. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.088302

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hartwell, J., Gill, A., Nimmo, G. A., Wilkins, M. B., Jenkins, G. I., and Nimmo, H. G. (1999). Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase is a novel protein kinase regulated at the level of expression. Plant J. 20, 333–342. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00609.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heber, U. (2002). Irrungen, wirrungen? The Mehler reaction in relation to cyclic electron transport in C3 plants. Photosynth. Res. 73, 223–231. doi: 10.1023/A:1020459416987

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heber, U., Bukhov, N. G., Shuvalov, V. A., Kobayashi, Y., and Lange, O. L. (2001). Protection of the photosynthetic apparatus against damage by excessive illumination in homoiohydric leaves and poikilohydric mosses and lichens. J. Exp. Bot. 52, 1999–2006. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.363.1999

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H. J., Ju, H. L., Lee, H. B., An, S. K., and Kim, K. S. (2017). CO₂ uptake behavior and vegetative growth of Doritaenopsis queen beer ‘Mantefon’ orchids as influenced by light/dark cycle manipulation. Flower Res. J. 25, 253–261. doi: 10.11623/frj.2017.25.4.10

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, D. M., and Assmann, S. M. (1992). Stomatal responses to light in the facultative crassulacean acid metabolism species, Portulacaria afra. Physiol. Plant. 85, 35–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb05260.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lind, C., Dreyer, I., Lopez-Sanjurjo, E. J., Meyer, K. V., Ishizaki, K., Kohchi, T., et al. (2015). Stomatal guard cells co-opted an ancient ABA-dependent desiccation survival system to regulate stomatal closure. Curr. Biol. 25, 928–935. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.067

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Males, J., and Griffiths, H. (2017). Stomatal biology of cam plants. Plant Physiol. 174, 550–560. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00114

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mattos, E. A. D., and Lüttge, U. (2001). Chlorophyll fluorescence and organic acid oscillations during transition from CAM to C3-photosynthesis in Clusia minor L. (Clusiaceae). Ann. Bot. 88, 457–463. doi: 10.1006/anbo.2001.1477

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelson, E. A., and Sage, R. F. (2008). Functional constraints of CAM leaf anatomy: tight cell packing is associated with increased CAM function across a gradient of CAM expression. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 1841–1850. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm346

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ng, T. B., Liu, J., Wong, J. H., Ye, X., Sze, S. C. W., Yao, T., et al. (2012). Review of research on Dendrobium, a prized folk medicine. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 93, 1795–1803. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3829-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nimmo, G. A., Nimmo, H. G., Fewson, C. A., and Wilkins, M. B. (1984). Diurnal changes in the properties of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in Bryophyllum leaves: a possible covalent modification. FEBS Lett. 178, 199–203. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(84)80600-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nimmo, G. A., Nimmo, H. G., Hamilton, I. D., Fewson, C. A., and Wilkins, M. B. (1986). Purification of the phosphorylated night form and dephosphorylated day form of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase from Bryophyllum fedtschenkoi. Biochem. J. 239, 213–220. doi: 10.1042/bj2390213

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nimmo, G. A., Wilkins, M. B., Fewson, C. A., and Nimmo, H. G. (1987). Persistent circadian rhythms in the phosphorylation state of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase from Bryophyllum fedtschenkoi leaves and in its sensitivity to inhibition by malate. Planta 170, 408–415. doi: 10.1007/BF00395034

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohara, T., and Satake, A. (2017). Photosynthetic entrainment of the circadian clock facilitates plant growth under environmental fluctuations: perspectives from an integrated model of phase oscillator and phloem transportation. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1859. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01859

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osmond, C. B. (1978). Crassulacean acid metabolism: a curiosity in context. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29, 379–414. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.002115

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osmond, C. B., and Grace, S. C. (1995). Perspectives on photoinhibition and photorespiration in the field: quintessential inefficiencies of the light and dark reactions of photosynthesis? J. Exp. Bot. 46, 1351–1362. doi: 10.1093/jxb/46.special_issue.1351

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Owen, N. A., and Griffiths, H. (2013). A system dynamics model integrating physiology and biochemical regulation predicts extent of crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) phases. New Phytol. 200, 1116–1131. doi: 10.1111/nph.12461

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Queiroz, O., and Morel, C. (1974). Photoperiodism and enzyme activity. Plant Physiol. 4, 596–602. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.4.596

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, J., and Bai, W. (2015). Advancement on elucidating geographical segregation in photosynthetic carbon assimilation pathway within genus Dendrobium. Curr. Biotechnol. 1, 35–40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2341.2015.01.05

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmitz, J. (1951). Über beziehungen zwischen blütenbildung in verschiedenen licht-dunkelkombinationen und atmungsrhythmik bei wechselnden photoperiodischen bedingungen. Planta 39, 271–308. doi: 10.1007/BF01942496

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sekizuka, F., Nose, A., Kavamitsu, Y., Murayama, S., and Arisumi, K. I. (1995). Effects of day length on gas exchange characteristics in the crassulacean acid metabolism plant Dendrobium ekapol cv. Panda. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 64, 201–208. doi: 10.1626/jcs.64.235

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silvera, K., Neubig, K. M., Whitten, W. M., Williams, N. H., Winter, K., and Cushman, J. C. (2010). Evolution along the crassulacean acid metabolism continuum. Funct. Plant Biol. 37, 995–1010. doi: 10.1071/FP10084

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, W., and Zhang, G. (2003). The photosynthesis pathway in leaves of Dendrobium officinale. Acta Phytoecol. Sin. 27, 631–637. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2003.0091 (in Chinese with English abstract)

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Takamiya, T., Wongsawad, P., Tajima, N., Shioda, N., Lu, J. F., Wen, C. L., et al. (2011). Identification of Dendrobium species used for herbal medicines based on ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequence. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 34, 779–782. doi: 10.1248/bpb.34.779

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tallman, G. (2004). Are diurnal patterns of stomatal movement the result of alternating metabolism of endogenous guard cell ABA and accumulation of ABA delivered to the apoplast around guard cells by transpiration? J. Exp. Bot. 55, 1963–1976. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh212

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tallman, G., Zhu, J., Mawson, B. T., Amodeo, G., Nouhi, Z., Levy, K., et al. (1997). Induction of cam in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum abolishes the stomatal response to blue light and light-dependent zeaxanthin formation in guard cell chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 38, 236–242. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029158

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Teixeira Da Silva, J. A., Dobranszki, J., Cardoso, J. C., Chandler, S. F., and Zeng, S. (2016). Methods for genetic transformation in Dendrobium. Plant Cell Rep. 35, 483–504. doi: 10.1007/s00299-015-1917-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Terashima, I., Hanba, Y. T., Tholen, D., and Niinemets, U. (2011). Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 155, 108–116. doi: 10.2307/41433988

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilkins, M. B. (1962). An endogenous rhythm in the rate of carbon dioxide output of Bryophyllum. IV. Effect of intensity of illumination on entrainment of the rhythm by cycles of light & darkness. Plant Physiol. 37, 735–741. doi: 10.1104/pp.37.6.735

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Winter, K. (2019). Ecophysiology of constitutive and facultative CAM photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. pii:erz002. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Winter, K., Garcia, M. N., and Holtum, J. A. M. (2008). On the nature of facultative and constitutive CAM: environmental and developmental control of CAM expression during early growth of Clusia, Kalanchoe, and Opuntia. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 1829–1840. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern080

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Winter, K., and Holtum, J. A. (2002). How closely do the δ¹³C values of crassulacean acid metabolism plants reflect the proportion of CO₂ fixed during day and night? Plant Physiol. 129, 1843–1851. doi: 10.1104/pp.002915

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Winter, K., and Holtum, J. A. M. (2014). Facultative crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plants: powerful tools for unravelling the functional elements of CAM photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 3425–3441. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru063

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Winter, K., Holtum, J. A. M., and Smith, J. A. C. (2015). Crassulacean acid metabolism: a continuous or discrete trait? New Phytol. 208, 73–78. doi: 10.1111/nph.13446

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, L., Wang, X., Liu, H., Tian, Y., Lian, J., Yang, R., et al. (2015). The genome of Dendrobium officinale illuminates the biology of the important traditional Chinese orchid herb. Mol. Plant 8, 922–934. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, J., Chen, C., Han, X., Li, X., and Liebig, H. P. (2002). Measurement of vegetable leaf area using digital image processing techniques. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agr. Eng. 18, 155–158. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2002.04.038 (in Chinese with English abstract)

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Z. H., Huang, W., Yang, Q. Y., Chang, W., and Zhang, S. B. (2018). Anatomical and diffusional determinants inside leaves explain the difference in photosynthetic capacity between cypripedium and paphiopedilum, Orchidaceae. Photosynth. Res. 136, 315–328. doi: 10.1007/s11120-017-0466-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, L., Wang, Y., Hu, Q., and Ren, J. (2011). Comparative study on photosynthesis between three Dendrobium and Kalanchoe daigremontiana. J. Shanxi Agric. Univ. 4, 294–301. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8151.2011.04.002 (in Chinese with English abstract)

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., He, D., Niu, G., and Gao, R. (2014). Concomitant CAM and C3 photosynthetic pathways in Dendrobium officinale plants. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 139, 290–298. doi: 10.21273/JASHS.139.3.290

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar