AUTHOR=Niu Zhixia , Chao Shiaoman , Cai Xiwen , Whetten Rebecca B. , Breiland Matthew , Cowger Christina , Chen Xianming , Friebe Bernd , Gill Bikram S. , Rasmussen Jack B. , Klindworth Daryl L. , Xu Steven S. 

TITLE=Molecular and Cytogenetic Characterization of Six Wheat-Aegilops markgrafii Disomic Addition Lines and Their Resistance to Rusts and Powdery Mildew

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Plant Science

VOLUME=9

YEAR=2018

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.01616

DOI=10.3389/fpls.2018.01616

ISSN=1664-462X

ABSTRACT=<p><italic>Aegilops markgrafii</italic> (Greuter) Hammer is an important source of genes for resistance to abiotic stresses and diseases in wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.). A series of six wheat ‘Alcedo’-<italic>Ae. markgrafii</italic> chromosome disomic addition lines, designated as AI(B), AII(C), AIII(D), AV(E), AIV(F), and AVIII(G) carrying the <italic>Ae</italic>. <italic>markgrafii</italic> chromosomes B, C, D, E, F, and G, respectively, were tested with SSR markers to establish homoeologous relationships to wheat and identify markers useful in chromosome engineering. The addition lines were evaluated for resistance to rust and powdery mildew diseases. The parents Alcedo and <italic>Ae. markgrafii</italic> accession ‘S740-69’ were tested with 1500 SSR primer pairs and 935 polymorphic markers were identified. After selecting for robust markers and confirming the polymorphisms on the addition lines, 132 markers were considered useful for engineering and establishing homoeologous relationships. Based on the marker analysis, we concluded that the chromosomes B, C, D, E, F, and G belong to wheat homoeologous groups 2, 5, 6, 7, 3, and 4, respectively. Also, we observed chromosomal rearrangements in several addition lines. When tested with 20 isolates of powdery mildew pathogen (<italic>Blumeria graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic>) from five geographic regions of the United States, four addition lines [AIII(D), AV(E), AIV(F), and AVIII(G)] showed resistance to some isolates, with addition line AV(E) being resistant to 19 of 20 isolates. The addition lines were tested with two races (TDBJ and TNBJ) of the leaf rust pathogen (<italic>Puccinia triticina</italic>), and only addition line AI(B) exhibited resistance at a level comparable to the <italic>Ae. markgrafii</italic> parent. Addition lines AII(C) and AIII(D) had been previously identified as resistant to the Ug99 race group of the stem rust pathogen (<italic>Puccinia graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic>). The addition lines were also tested for resistance to six United States races (PSTv-4, PSTv-14, PSTv-37, PSTv-40, PSTv-51, and PSTv-198) of the stripe rust pathogen (<italic>Puccinia striiformis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic>); we found no resistance either in Alcedo or any of the addition lines. The homoeologous relationships of the chromosomes in the addition lines, molecular markers located on each chromosome, and disease resistance associated with each chromosome will allow for chromosome engineering of the resistance genes.</p>