Luís F. Goulao
João C. Fernandes
Sara Amâncio- Linking Landscape Environment Agriculture and Food (LEAF), Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
The noteworthy fine remodeling that plant cell walls (CWs) undergo to adapt to developmental, physiological and environmental cues and the observation that its composition and dynamics differ between species represents an opportunity to couple crop species agronomic studies with research on CW modifications. Vitis vinifera is one of the most important crops from an economic point-of-view due to the high value of the fruit, predominantly for winemaking. The availability of some information related to this species’ CWs allows researching its responses to imposed conditions that affect the plant’s development. Mineral deficiency, in particular nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulfur, strongly affects plant metabolism, reducing both growth and crop yield. Despite the importance of mineral nutrition in development, its influence on CW synthesis and modifications is still insufficiently documented. Addressing this knowledge gap, V. vinifera experimental models were used to study CW responses to imposed mineral depletion in unorganized (callus) and organized (shoots) tissues. The discussion of the obtained results is the main focus of this review. Callus and shoots submitted to mineral restriction are impaired in specific CW components, predominantly cellulose. Reorganization on structure and deposition of several other polymers, in particular the degree and pattern of pectin methyl-esterification and the amount of xyloglucan (XyG), arabinan and extensin, is also observed. In view of recently proposed CW models that consider biomechanical hotspots and direct linkages between pectins and XyG/cellulose, the outcome of these modifications in explaining maintenance of CW integrity through compensatory stiffening can be debated. Nutrient stresses do not affect evenly all tissues with undifferentiated callus tissues showing more pronounced responses, followed by shoot mature internodes, and then newly formed internodes. The impact of nitrogen depletion leads to more noticeable responses, supporting this nutrient’s primary role in plant development and metabolism. The consequential compensatory mechanisms highlight the pivotal role of CW in rearranging under environmental stresses.
Introduction
Grapevine/wine, together with olive tree/olive oil and cork oak/cork, is one of the three outstanding Mediterranean agriculture dual systems. Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) is one of the most economically important fruit crops due to the high value of the fruit and its importance for winemaking. Understanding the biology and physiology underlying vine performance and how they can relate to cultural practices is mandatory to project strategies that maximize vineyard profits.
Growth of the canopy and plant organs calls our attention to the primary cell wall (CW) and its paradoxical features. CWs are load-bearing, extensible viscoelastic structures that surround the cells, acting as an “exoskeleton” that provides structural and mechanical support. Nevertheless expansion of growing cells encompasses simultaneously CW loosening and maintenance of enough strength to withstand internal high turgor forces. CWs play a crucial role in the regulation of both rate and direction of growth and determine plant cells and organs morphology (Fry, 1986; Chebli and Geitmann, 2017). The plant CW dynamic complex has further functions such as control of diffusion through the apoplast, signaling, regulation of cell-to-cell interactions, carbohydrate storage, or protection against biotic (Vorwerk et al., 2004; Bethke et al., 2016) and abiotic (Zhong and Ye, 2007; Tenhaken, 2015) stresses.
Abiotic stress refers to environmental conditions unfavorable for growth and proper development. In nature, plants are often exposed to several stress conditions at the same time (Mittler, 2006; Mittler and Blumwald, 2010). Atkinson and Urwin (2012) found evidence that plant responses to multiple environmental stresses are distinct from those triggered by individual stress factors and not just additive. Recent reviews by Le Gall et al. (2015) and Tenhaken (2015) focus on the effect of abiotic stresses on CW remodeling, quoting temperature (cold or heat), drought, flooding, osmotic stress and salinity, air pollutants, while boron deficiency is the only referred nutrient stress factor addressed (Tenhaken, 2015). Together with biotic stresses, the former abiotic conditions were reviewed by Houston et al. (2016). Particularly relevant, in the context of our review, are the implications that some abiotic stressors exert also in terms of interfering with plant mineral nutrition, which is our main focus. In fact, drought impairs nutrient uptake from soil solution, although not linearly. However, under sustainable viticulture practices, grapevine deficit irrigation and limited nitrogen (N) application can be used to control vegetative growth, canopy development, yield, and fruit composition (Keller, 2005).
It is well described that deficiencies in major minerals, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and sulfur (S), strongly affect metabolism with subsequent impacts on plant growth, crop yield and nutritional value and quality of the agronomic product (Amtmann and Armengaud, 2009; Fernandes et al., 2009; Tschoep et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2012). Unquestionably, mineral deficiency, with other abiotic stresses, challenges CW integrity and activates control mechanisms (Tenhaken, 2015). Examples of CW-related effects of limited mineral nutrient availability in the whole plant include reduced organ growth rates that can be explained by inhibition of cell expansion (Palmer et al., 1996) via reduction of CW plastic extensibility (Taylor et al., 1993; Snir and Neumann, 1997). Also at the individual cell level, decreased length and relative elongation rates have been reported, for instance, in Lolium perenne developing under phosphates limitation (Kavanová et al., 2006) and Arabidopsis growing under phosphate limitation (Balzergue et al., 2017). Concerning the later, P deficiency inhibited Arabidopsis root cell elongation according to a fine-tuned process that involves signaling regulation of malate efflux channel and ferroxidase genes. This inhibition is preceded by peroxidase-dependent CW stiffening of pre-elongated cells in a process controlled by Fe redox cycling, and coupled with callose accumulation in the root apex (Balzergue et al., 2017). Likewise, the deficiency in sulfur induces the accumulation of peptides related with Chlamydomonas reinhardtii CW structural protein synthesis (Takahashi et al., 2001).
In the primary CW, cellulose is identified as the main load-bearing polysaccharide. Cross-linking glycans, also referred to as hemicellulose polysaccharides, bond to cellulose (Cosgrove, 2005) to form an extensive framework. Hemicellulose polysaccharides are diverse and include xyloglucans (XyG), xylans and mannans (Liepman et al., 2007). Current models propose that XyG linkages are restricted to a minor component of the CW, closely intertwined with cellulose at limited sites, named “biomechanical hotspots,” providing selective targets for CW loosening (Park and Cosgrove, 2012, 2015). This network provides tensile strength to the CW and is embedded, with covalent linkages at specific regions, in a surrounding phase of hydrophilic gels constituted by pectic polysaccharides (Cosgrove, 2001; Popper and Fry, 2005; Zykwinska et al., 2007; Marcus et al., 2008) that determines the regulation of the hydration status and ion transport, the definition of the porosity and control of the wall permeability (Willats et al., 2001). These features are, in turn, defined by the chemical structure of these polymers, particularly the branching degree and pattern, namely the decoration with neutral sugars and the degree and pattern of methyl and acetyl esterification, which can ultimately lead to either stiffening or weakening the CW (Goulao, 2010). In addition to polysaccharides, a third network composed of structural glycoproteins further contributes to the biophysical properties of the primary CW and cell adhesion (Showalter, 1993; Cosgrove, 1997).
After the sequencing and public availability of the V. vinifera genome (Jaillon et al., 2007; Velasco et al., 2007), genomic resources for this species have proliferated, allowing large-scale profiling studies of gene expression (Grimplet et al., 2007; Zenoni et al., 2010) and proteomics (Sarry et al., 2004; Castro et al., 2005; Grimplet et al., 2007; Vincent et al., 2007; Jellouli et al., 2008; Giribaldi and Giuffrida, 2010) during development. In berries, such approaches allowed the identification of members of CW-related enzymes previously overlooked such as pectin methylesterase inhibitors (PMEIs) or cellulose synthases (CesAs) to be involved in development (DeLuc et al., 2007; Zenoni et al., 2010) and stress responses (Fernandes et al., 2015). In other species, modifications in gene expression involved in CW organization were reported in response to mineral deficiencies (Watanabe et al., 2010; Zeng et al., 2016).
The use of complementary experimental methodologies allowed drafting a map of V. vinifera CW responses to different forms of mineral –N, P and S– deficit, which will be described hereafter, under the main objective of this review. An integrated approach that included Fourier–Transform Infrared (FT–IR) spectroscopy coupled with chemometrics and polymer quantification, including Gas-Chromatography monosaccharide quantification of CW fractions, delivered a broad picture of the metabolic events triggered upon mineral depletion (Fernandes et al., 2013). V. vinifera in muro responses and specific CW component rearrangement after the depletion of individual major nutrients, were described by immunolocalization assays (Fernandes et al., 2016a) and complemented with qPCR mRNA quantification for selected genes (Fernandes et al., 2016b). Employing different biological systems, namely callus as a dedifferentiated system, and shoots, as a model for plant differentiated tissues, was instrumental in challenging current models of primary CW arrangements and dynamics in this economically valued species (Fernandes, 2015).
Impairment in Cell Wall Polymers and Possible Compensatory Mechanisms
Global results using two model systems show that N and P deficiency brings about more pronounced responses than S shortage. Despite the observation of an equivalent trend, the extent of the responses depends on the individual plant tissue under stress. The common impacts of mineral deficiency on V. vinifera primary CWs include: (i) decreased cellulose content; (ii) increased total pectic polysaccharides that are rich in calcium-complexed homogalacturonic acid (HG) regions; (iii) increased pectin methylesterification; (iv) increased amounts of XyG and extensins. For each individual stress, observed changes are represented in Figure 1 in which –N (panel B), –P (panel C) and –S (panel D) can be pair-wised compared with the control representation (panel A). A first map of CW modifications was obtained by FT-IR analyses in CW samples of homogeneous and reproducible callus growing in medium depleted in individual minerals (Fernandes et al., 2013). The negative values with respect to control observed between the peaks in wavenumbers 1033, 1041, and 1650 cm-1, assigned to C-OH groups of cellulose, to XyG and to proteins (Kačuráková et al., 2000), respectively, suggest a lower abundance of these components, most strikingly in –N samples. Conversely, the opposite trend was recorded for peaks in wavenumbers 950 and 1740 cm-1, related to a higher amount of pectin backbones (Coimbra et al., 1999) and pectin methyl-esters (Alonso-Simón et al., 2004), respectively.
FIGURE 1. Representation of cell wall composition, architecture and expression trends of cell wall associated genes in grapevine biological systems under full major elements nutrition (A) and under depletion of nitrogen (B), phosphorous (C) or sulfur (D). Highlight summary of major changes in CW polymers abundance detected when compared with control conditions (A), -N (B): ▼▼▼ cellulose; ▲▲ xyloglucan; ▲ biomechanical hotspots; ▲▲ arabinan-rich regions; ▲▲ un-methylesterified pectins; ▲▲ calcium-linked pectin regions (“egg boxes”); ▲ extensins, -P (C): ▼▼ cellulose; ▲ xyloglucan; ▲ biomechanical hotspots; ▲ arabinan-rich regions; ▲ un-methylesterified pectins; ▲ extensins, -S (D): ▼ cellulose; ▲ xyloglucan; ▲ biomechanical hotspots; ▲ arabinan-rich regions; ▲ extensins. Gene accession numbers are given in Supplementary Table 1.
These candidate CW modifications were confirmed using complementary quantification methods both in callus (Fernandes et al., 2013) and in two types of differentiated shoot tissues, the fourth (I-4) and the first (I-1) internode from the top of grapevine cuttings growing under the same mineral stress conditions (Fernandes et al., 2016a). The callus model allowed quantifying a reduction in cellulose content of ca. 43% under –N and ca. 12% under –P when compared to the control. In organized tissues, mineral deficiency impact on impairment of cellulose deposition occurs in both regions but was more pronounced in the older shoots. Fewer and longer internodes observed in –N I-4 shoots (Fernandes et al., 2016a), confirmed previous results in Phaseolus (Triplett et al., 1981), and the hypothesis that nitrogen deficiency induces changes in cell elongation and expansion (Cooke et al., 2003; Pitre et al., 2010; Plavcová et al., 2012).
Plants can compensate the impairment in biosynthesis or deposition of CW components by alternative mechanisms to keep the CW’s integrity (Pilling and Höfte, 2003; Wolf et al., 2012). Under –N and –P, both undifferentiated and differentiated tissues showed putative compensatory alternative mechanisms to less cellulose to reinforce CWs that included increased pectin content accompanied with a lower total degree of methylesterification and a higher proportion of arabinose-containing polysaccharides, probably tightly attached to the CW [Figure 1; compare panel A (control) with panels B (-N) and C (-P)]. A significant negative correlation between cellulose and pectin amounts was disclosed in the CW of the Arabidopsis mutant kor1-1 (Nicol et al., 1998; Sato et al., 2001). In fact, the decrease in cellulose content due to a deficiency in an endo-1,4-beta-glucanase with a transmembrane domain, putatively involved in cellulose correct deposition, was accompanied by a 150% increase of pectin amounts (His et al., 2001), although the enzyme has no known association with the pectin content. Since pectins can function as mechanical tethers between cellulose microfibrils (Park and Cosgrove, 2012; Peaucelle et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012) and long de-esterified stretches of HG acid favor the formation of calcium bridges, the proposed compensatory effect of reduced deposition of cellulose may result from the direct reinforcement of the glycan network and/or the stiffening or increased intercellular adhesion that outcomes from the formation of “egg-box” structures (Jarvis, 1984) and supramolecular pectic gels (Carpita and Gibeaut, 1993). This pattern of methyl de-esterification was confirmed by immunodot detection with the 2F4 antibody in V. vinifera callus and shoots CWs under –N (Fernandes et al., 2013, 2016a).
Complementary analyses employing in muro immunolocalization with specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in the internodes system evidence a different arrangement of 1,5-arabinan side-chains in both I-1 and I-4. Highly heterogeneous rhamnogalacturonans-I (RG-I) are rich in neutral side chains (Caffall and Mohnen, 2009) and this diversity contributes to the definition of CW properties. Hence, the detection of high levels of arabinose may reflect an augmented biosynthesis of pectic polysaccharides or a higher side-chains substitution with arabinosyl residues. Under some abiotic stress conditions, RGI arabinosyl side chains can work as CW plasticizers (Harholt et al., 2010) supporting the suggested role of maintaining structural integrity. Ulvskov et al. (2005) analyzed the mechanical properties of Solanum tuberosum tuber CW in wild-type and transformed plants with decreased contents of arabinan and reported that the force which induces failure of the CW decreased in the latter. Further supporting the assumption of pectin compensatory role, the Arabidopsis cellulose synthase mutant MUR10/CesA7 impaired in cellulose biosynthesis, showed an increase in pectic arabinan content (Bosca et al., 2006).
It is assumed that not all of the cellulose microfibril surfaces are covered with XyG (Bootten et al., 2004; Hanus and Mazeau, 2006; Park and Cosgrove, 2012). Nevertheless the CWs of an Arabidopsis XyG deficient mutant are more extensible than the wild-type (Park and Cosgrove, 2012). In conditions of impaired cellulose deposition, the amount and, most importantly, the XyG arrangement in the CW should act also as a compensatory mechanism to preserve the tissue’s integrity (Pilling and Höfte, 2003; Wolf et al., 2012). Regarding XyG, both I-1 and I-4 internodes showed immunolocalization of the LM15 mAb in the phloem, xylem, vascular bundle and parenchyma cells (Fernandes et al., 2016a). Under nitrogen deficiency significant amounts of XyG as well as more discrete points of accumulation were observed following a pattern that may be related with the “biomechanical hotspots” model (Park and Cosgrove, 2012, 2015).
In V. vinifera CWs, the effects of –S were less dramatic than –N and –P (symbolized in Figure 1 comparing panel A with D vs. panel A with B or C). Although callus growth under –S was similar to that observed under –N, no significant reduction in cellulose was noticed (Fernandes et al., 2013). Nonetheless, in this condition, biological material, was more prone to the formation of egg-box structures, similarly to –N conditions. An increased deposition of extensin was observed, confirming the previous observations of this structural protein in response to several stresses (Showalter et al., 1992; Hirsinger et al., 1997; Ueda et al., 2007). Primary CW extensins (Showalter, 1993) have been implicated in the control of CW extension and strengthening by the formation of intermolecular peroxidase-mediated or covalent extensin-pectin cross-links (Qi et al., 1995; Jackson et al., 2001; Nuñez et al., 2009). The contribution of extensins to compensate the dramatic reduction in cellulose in –N growing callus also occurred in –S conditions [see Figure 1 by paralleling panels B (–N) and D (–S) with control panel A]. Conversely, in organized tissues of internodes formed under –N and –P conditions tissues, the mAb reactive extensin epitopes (LM1) showed a lower signal was observed under –S environments.
Biosynthesis and Remodeling Enzyme Activity and Gene Expression
Quantification of enzyme activity and expression of the respective coding genes have been useful research methods in addressing the regulation of synthesis and remodeling of plant CW polymers. CW-modifying enzymes exist in large multigene families (Farrokhi et al., 2006; Lerouxel et al., 2006), as result of more than 2000 genes (Carpita et al., 2001) that express according with distinct patterns among cells, tissues and development stages. Enzyme functions have been unveiled looking at genotypes impaired or overexpressing particular gene members (e.g., Osato et al., 2006; Peaucelle et al., 2008; Miedes et al., 2010). To our knowledge, at the molecular regulation level, no results of systematic research on the CW specific composition and arrangement modifications in response to –N, –P and –S deprivation are available.
High-throughput analysis allowed to identify CW genes responsive to phosphate starvation (Zeng et al., 2016) or sulfur depletion (Watanabe et al., 2010). To address the expression of candidate gene families, V. vinifera callus system was used as biological resource (Fernandes et al., 2016b). Most gene functional categories encompass overlapping multigenic families, and coding genes related to CW-biosynthesis and remodeling follow a pattern which may result in compensatory mechanisms to account for altered transcription (Giovannoni, 2004). The sequencing of the V. vinifera genome (Jaillon et al., 2007) and transcriptome (Velasco et al., 2007) allowed recovering the sequence of members of grapevine CW synthesis and remodeling multigene families. Mineral stress conditions gave rise to the expression of key candidate genes from all selected families (Fernandes et al., 2016b). Despite the more pronounced effect of –N in callus CWs (Fernandes et al., 2013), a higher number of genes with significant altered expression is observed after P and S imposed deficiency, suggesting complex regulation pathways (see affected genes listed associated to each representation in Figures 1B–D).
The decrease in cellulose content, the most striking result obtained in callus growing under –N and –P, (Fernandes et al., 2013) cannot be explained by a transcription impairment of V. vinifera cellulose synthase (VviCesA) genes. CesA multigene families encompass 18 members in Populus trichocarpa (Suzuki et al., 2006) and at least 10 members in Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa (Richmond and Somerville, 2000), and V. vinifera (Fernandes et al., 2016b). In V. vinifera callus, none of the CesA members was significantly down-regulated and –N and –P conditions, respectively, triggered the expression of VviCesA3 and VviCesA8. Moreover, the expression of VviCesA6 was inhibited in –S, (Fernandes et al., 2016b), interestingly, the only tested mineral that did not impact cellulose amounts (Fernandes et al., 2013).
In Arabidopsis mutants defective in CesA, a significant reduction in cellulose content and a moderate irregular growth were observed (Desprez et al., 2007; Handakumbura et al., 2013) confirming CesAs requirement for cellulose synthesis (Somerville, 2006; Endler and Persson, 2011). However, CesA activity is not enough for the formation of the cellulose fibril network, suggesting that correct cellulose synthesis, deposition or assemblage requires the coordinated contribution of other components (Takahashi et al., 2009). The sub-classes A and C of the glycosyl hydrolase 9 (GH9) family (beta-1,4-endo-glucanase) are known to participate in cellulose biosynthesis. Mutant backgrounds impaired on KORRIGAN (KOR), a GH9A expression (Urbanowicz et al., 2007a), show the requirement of KOR for the correct cellulose assemblage in elongating cells since the cells showed significantly reduced cellulose content even under normal CesA members expression (Nicol et al., 1998). It is interesting to note that KOR is reported as an integral part of the CesA complex (Vain et al., 2014). In V. vinifera callus mineral stress did not show significant modifications in the expression of CH9A family gene members, except for class C VviGH9C2, which was severely down-regulated under –N and, unexpectedly but confirming the VviCesA6 expression, under –S conditions (Fernandes et al., 2016b). Class C GH9s hold a cellulose binding module (CBM) attached to the C-terminus of the catalytic domain (Urbanowicz et al., 2007b) and in P. trichocarpa it was demonstrated that PtGH9C2 regulates cellulose crystallinity (Glass et al., 2015). It was proposed that cellulose crystallinity affects the expansion of the primary CW (Fujita et al., 2011) due to a lower number of potential cross-links with hemicelluloses (Lai-Kee-Him et al., 2002). The role of GH9C members in CW cellulose assemblage deserves a more detailed investigation.
Expansins (EXP) are directly implicated in changes in CW extensibility and strength and associated to lower levels of cellulose. These CW remodeling proteins reversibly break up hydrogen bonds between glycan groups from cellulose microfibrils and matrix XyGs as demonstrated by in vitro CW loosening (McQueen-Mason and Cosgrove, 1995; Cosgrove, 2000; Whitney et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2013). The expansin gene family encompass α-expansin (EXPA), β-expansins (EXPBs), expansin-like A (EXLA), and expansin-like B (EXLB) subfamilies. The association of EXPAs to cell expansion and plant growth and development (Cosgrove, 1999, 2000), was confirmed by studies using transgenic backgrounds (Choi et al., 2006). In V. vinifera, VviEXP6 and VviEXP11 were down-regulated in response to N and P deficiencies, more severely in –P conditions. Assuming the decreased cellulose content, the combination of more biomechanical hotspots with a down-regulation of EXPA genes may explain a mechanism to hold CW loosening, preserving its integrity. Conversely, S starvation, which does not impair cellulose deposition, led to the repression of VviEXPA5, Vvi-EXPA19 and VviEXPA20 transcripts together with the activation of VviEXP6, again a surprising result in line with the down-regulation of cellulose biosynthesis genes.
Xyloglucan endotransglycosylases/hydrolase (XTH) enzyme family encompasses members that induce CW extensibility in in vitro assays (Van Sandt et al., 2007). Out of the 10 XTH members expressing in V. vinifera callus tissues, sequence analyzes of two members, VviXTH31 and VviXTH32, predicted hydrolase activity (Eklöf and Brumer, 2010). The expression of both transcripts was altered by mineral stress. The latter is repressed in all stress conditions while the former was down-regulated only under –N. The expression pattern of the remaining XTHs was dependent of the absent mineral. Similarly to EXPAs, a trend for a down-regulation under –N and –P was observed, while under –S an up-regulation pattern was quantified in two members and only a single member was repressed (Fernandes et al., 2016a). XTHs action can promote polysaccharide chains elongation independently from activated nucleotide sugars, so the involvement of some members in the formation of covalent linkages between cellulose microfibrils can also be proposed (Shinohara et al., 2017). Enzyme activity detected in extracts of plant elongation zones such as tomato hypocotyls or Arabidopsis roots over- or down-expressing/silenced members of the XTH family agree with changes in gene expression and correlate positively with CW extensibility and organ growth (Osato et al., 2006; Miedes et al., 2010; Wilson et al., 2015). Conversely, the effect on growth patterns or developmental phenotypes of some XTH isoforms is negligible (Kaewthai et al., 2013), suggesting their role in a XyG-recycling pathway. This pathway could modulate reinforcement in the XyG network due to the quantity of available non-reducing ends, prone to an increase in “biomechanical hotspots” (Sampedro et al., 2010, 2012).
Models of CW architecture were revisited after the empirical confirmation of covalent bonds between pectin polymers and cellulose microfibrils (Zykwinska et al., 2005, 2007; Park and Cosgrove, 2015) or matrix- glycans (Popper and Fry, 2005; Marcus et al., 2008). The new models highlight pectin methylesterases (PMEs) and their specific inhibitors (PMEI) (Bellincampi et al., 2004; Di Matteo et al., 2005; Juge, 2006; Jolie et al., 2010; reviewed by Goulao, 2010), which are known to significantly hit biophysical properties in the remodeling of CWs. In fact, the more pectin polymers host methyl groups the less hydrated calcium-linked gel structures are formed and the less can be depolymerized by polygalacturonase (PG) or pectate lyase (PL) hydrolysis. Both events contribute to increased wall stiffness and reduced creep and CW relaxation (Brummell and Harpster, 2001; Willats et al., 2001; Wakabayashi et al., 2003). The function and contribution of PMEs to CW loosening was experimentally proven, for instance, by over-expressing a PME in Arabidopsis which gave rise to a lower pectin methylesterification (Peaucelle et al., 2008; Hongo et al., 2012), or cell elongation inhibition (Derbyshire et al., 2007). Furthermore, the former effects could be reverted by overexpressing a member of the PMEI family (Peaucelle et al., 2011) and an equivalent equilibrium between PME and PMEI controlling the de-esterification rate was detected in Arabidopsis roots (Wilson et al., 2015).
As referred for other remodeling enzymes, PME genes express as a multigene family (Markovic and Janecek, 2004). Depending on the presence of a N-terminal PRO extension preceding the conserved PMEI domain (Jolie et al., 2010), PMEs are classified into two subfamilies: type I/group2 or type II/group 1 (Micheli, 2001). It is referred that group2 plant PMEs, with an acidic pI, act in a non-block-wise fashion, while group 1 plant basic pI PMEs, which represent the majority of the isoforms responding to mineral stress, act in a block-wise fashion (Bosch and Hepler, 2005). They produce long linear stretches of unesterified HG chains and promote Ca2+-linked gel structures formation and consequently, stiffen the CW. Coping with this model, basic PMEs represent solid candidates to act in compensatory mechanisms after the lack of cellulose. However, in the callus system model under –N, –P or –S conditions, with the exception of the increased expression of basic VViPME1.4 and VViPME1.11 under –P and –S, PME genes encompassing members from both groups were unaffected or down-regulated. Both transcripts are predicted to encode basic pI PMEs and the hypothesis of a significant role in the formation of “egg-boxes” should not be ruled out.
Interestingly, under mineral depletion, the expression of PMEI genes is globally up-regulated or not affected, again with different members responding to the individual mineral causing the stress. As a whole, an inhibition of PME gene expression upon mineral stress suggests a reduction in enzymatic de-esterification potential. Hence, the lower global degree (Fernandes et al., 2013) and the pattern of methylesterification (Fernandes et al., 2016a) that results from some mineral starvation conditions cannot be fully explained by the PME gene expression levels.
Four genes were affected by all individual stress conditions, namely VViEXPA6, VviXTH32, VviPME1.4 and VviPME1.17. Interestingly, opposite trends of gene expression were observed in VviEXPA6 for –S samples and VviPME1.4 for –N material, when compared to the remaining two conditions. These findings suggest distinct regulatory pathways for individual mineral stresses, although pointing to the same goal of compensatory stiffening of the CW in result of deposition impairment of a given component.
Additionally to gene expression, the potential loosening activity of salt extracts from V. vinifera callus growing under N, P or S deficiency and the in vivo mechanical modifications that those extracts produce on dicot CW specimens was investigated. This model showed that under –N conditions, callus salt extracts have significantly inhibited total endoglucanase activity (Fernandes et al., 2016b). This result that putatively reflects an impairment in crystallization of the callus cellulose microfibrils and the associated CW reinforcement by more cellulose-XyG cross-links (Fujita et al., 2011), relates to enzymes with distinct activities. They may include endoglucanase, xyloglucan endotransglucosylase (XET), xyloglucan endohydrolase (XEH) or all. When applied to cucumber hypocotyls in extensibility tests, protein salt extracts from –N and –P callus promoted plastic deformation with no alteration in the elastic deformation (Fernandes et al., 2016b). This result sounds with the effects in CW stiffening considering that additional stiffening occurs in the absence of CW elastic deformation, including under abiotic stress (Micheli, 2001). On the other hand, plastic deformation is compulsory for the wall-loosening reactions involved in irreversible growth (Hohl and Schopfer, 1992). Since under –N and –P, callus produced increased extractable plastic deformation activity, this result may be related with the occurrence of CW stiffening, independent from growth regulation. Expansins and XTHs are CW-loosening agents that regulate CW expansion and cell enlargement through elastic deformation (Cosgrove, 2000; Miedes et al., 2013), therefore, the results obtained in extensibility tests sound with the general down-regulation of expansins and most XTHs genes quantified in response to mineral stress.
Final Considerations
In general, abiotic stress refers to conditions that are unfavorable for plant growth. Mineral stress and drought, which are likely to affect the plant development, yield and, ultimately, the quality of the economic products, are included in the referred conditions.
Plant systems in controlled conditions are useful tools to assess stressful situations. The effect of mineral stress, N, P and S, could be investigated withdrawing individual minerals from V. vinifera growing substrates in two model systems. V. vinifera callus, as a dedifferentiated system, provided a useful model to understand CW responses to stress effects caused by mineral deficit, reducing eventual interference with other concomitant effects. Plant differentiated tissues, namely shoots as a more complex experimental system, complement the indications delivered by the simple callus model, since the organization of polymers in the CW is a key-factor for tissue organization.
The results highlighted in this review propose that V. vinifera responses to mineral stress include triggering compensatory mechanisms to keep CW integrity that would be compromised by the resulting reduction in the amounts of major load-bearing polymers. These observations also allow debating previous and current plant primary CW models. In fact, our results are better explained assuming the recently revised model that suggests load-bearing XyGs hidden in tight junctions that bind microfibrils together, instead of tethering cellulose microfibrils, and the resurgence of the interest in pectins composition and matrix–cellulose interactions in the CW structure.
Globally, the significant reduction in cellulose content observed under –N and –P suggests a specific controlled and fine-tuned sensing mechanism to sustain CW integrity. These findings are in accordance with Pilling and Höfte (2003) and Wolf et al. (2012) reports on the trigger of compensatory alternative reinforcement mechanisms via biosynthesis of novel material or establishment of new linkages when plant CW integrity is compromised. XyG may play an important role in the wall and influence its characteristics. Under nitrogen deficiency, the increased amounts of XyG can then be explained as a CW reinforcement mechanism, via biosynthesis of new material or establishment of new linkages. The reduced degree of pectin methyl esterification that occurred under mineral deficiency, specially –N, can be another response to low levels of cellulose. If the reduction of methyl esterification occurs in long stretches of HG chains, it promotes the formation of calcium bridges, the “egg–box” structures (Pelloux et al., 2007) that were labeled in most of the stress conditions. On the other hand, a higher substitution by arabinosyl residues in RGI side chains can work as plasticizers in CWs that undergo large physical remodeling (Harholt et al., 2010). Low levels of cellulose and high levels of arabinan enriched pectins were highlighted as a response to abiotic stresses (Le Gall et al., 2015).
Molecular evidences of CesA family gene expression fail to explain the observed reduction in cellulose content and drive the attention to members of other families, such as class C GH9s (Urbanowicz et al., 2007b), which hold predicted hydrolytic activity. Highlighted is the evidence that VvGH9C2 can be severely down-regulated under mineral stress. Similarly, the lower global degree and the pattern of methyl-esterification observed under some mineral starvation conditions cannot be directly explained by the inhibition PME genes. The exception may be the basic group 1 PMEs in –P and –S which act upon the HG chain in a linearly way promoting the formation of Ca2+-linked gel structures and, in this way, stiffening and reducing CW extensibility (Micheli, 2001). Furthermore, the observed up-regulated PMEI genes may regulate the activity of PMEs. One can also speculate that CW-related genes may function redundantly with the repression of one isoform compensated by the up-transcription of others (Matsui et al., 2005; Iurlaro et al., 2016).
A reliable picture of CW composition as well as tentative models of CW structure are available since last century 60–70 decades (Albersheim et al., 1967). The “tethered network” was the most consensual primary dicot CW model. In this representation, the hemicellulose polymers extensively link cellulose through hydrogen bonds to produce a load bearing tether, interleaved in an amorphous cement-like pectin matrix (Cosgrove, 2001). In this model, cellulose is described as the main load-bearing polysaccharide. However, the use of more sophisticated techniques allowed the attempts for a clear-cut model explaining CW structure and architectural organization (Cosgrove and Jarvis, 2012) and subsequent results disclosed the presence of covalent linkages between RGI-arabinan side-chains and cellulose microfibrils (Zykwinska et al., 2007) and between xyloglucan and pectins (Popper and Fry, 2005; Marcus et al., 2008) providing structural links between two major CW domains. Moreover, in agreement with the “biomechanical hotspot” concept (Park and Cosgrove, 2012; Peaucelle et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012), not all of the cellulose microfibril surfaces are covered with XyG (Bootten et al., 2004; Hanus and Mazeau, 2006; Park and Cosgrove, 2012), so it is not surprising that other linkages, such as the referred cellulose and hemicellulose bonds with pectic polysaccharides are expected to maintain CW structure.
Assuming that only a limited cellulose surface is in contact with XyG (Bootten et al., 2004; Dick-Perez et al., 2011), pectins can be looked as hydrophilic dynamic polymers which may ease microfibrils motion as CW expands (Park and Cosgrove, 2015). Alternatively to XyG, pectic monosaccharides such as RG-I sidechains arabinan and galactan rich (Zykwinska et al., 2007, 2008) may be linked to cellulose (Cosgrove, 2014). Assuming a pectins’ role as mechanical tethers between microfibrils (Peaucelle et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012), the combined increased arabinose observed under -N conditions, its expected impact in CW reinforcement, and the preservation of significant plastic deformation capacity, sounds with the existence of “biomechanical hotspots” as proposed by Park and Cosgrove (2012, 2015). The presence of these regions in the CW agrees with the assumption that wall extensibility depends less of the viscoelasticity of matrix polymers and more of the selective separation between microfibrils at limited CW sites. Moreover, under –N and –P, total sugars shift from more easily extractable CW fractions to fractions more tightly attached to insoluble material (Fernandes et al., 2013; Fernandes, 2015). Hydrolytic enzymes were formerly imagined to play a lead role in CW loosening and in the expansion mechanism (Farkas and Maclachlan, 1988; McDougall and Fry, 1990). Although clear-cut evidences of their activity in breaking crystalline cellulose glycosidic bonds are still missing (Vissenberg et al., 2001; Cosgrove, 2005), a contribution to CW loosening, turning it more pliable for expansion, is recognized (Cosgrove, 2005).
In summary, under conditions of cellulose impairment, CW integrity may be maintained through more XyG and biomechanical hotspots and reinforced arabinan-rich linkage points and modified structure of pectins that are bonded to 1,4-glycan polymers, acting as load-bearing components. In Arabidopsis, it was demonstrated that xylan chains were attached to RG-I chains and mediate the adsorption of mucilage to cellulose microfibrils, suggesting a binding affinity of xylose ramifications on RG-I to a cellulose scaffold (Ralet et al., 2016). Cellulose-pectin interactions occur when pectin was present during cellulose synthesis and the strength of the pectin-calcium gel affects its structure and crystallinity (Lopez-Sanchez et al., 2017). More pectins may also have a role in preventing an increase in intracellular spaces, which are associated with decreased CW stiffness (Pieczywek et al., 2017). These results highlight the importance of assembly order on the properties of cellulose composite networks and support the role of pectin in the mechanics of CWs (Lopez-Sanchez et al., 2017).
Even though the cellulose content remained unaffected, V. vinifera tissues developing under –S conditions show similar responses, namely Ca2+-complexed pectins, arabinan-rich polymers, extensins, and, interestingly, more affected CW-related genes when compared to –N and –P samples. One can speculate a common regulatory point in the pathways of cellulose impairment and compensatory mechanisms that outcomes the latter while a specificity of –S stress allows overcoming the former.
Finally, it can be concluded that the impact of each mineral on CW composition and structure is mostly specific. As expected, nitrogen effects more extensively while the impacts of sulfur are the less pronounced. Although both elements integrate the composition of amino acids and consequently, of proteins, N occurs is some order of magnitude higher than S, and its scarcity has more dramatic effects on protein synthesis, hampering the compensation by other proteins.
No evidences are available to ascertain the specific point of the cellulose deposition pathway that is affect by –N and –P depletion. In fact, CesAs and some GH9 members’ gene expression suggest that the imposed conditions could have affected correct processing or assemblage rather than cellulose synthesis. Future work should focus the functional role of GH9C, but also XTH with hydrolase activity members, in response to these and other abiotic stresses. Understanding if cellulose is less redundant in the CW than pectins, as a heterogeneous family of polymers, should be also the subject of further investigation.
Recognizing that nutrient deficiency triggers responses that compromise the CW, from an agronomic point of view this evidence hastens widening the research to field experiments. As sustainable viticulture practices currently recommend deficit irrigation, which is known to lead to N deficit, and P environment limitation is foreseen in the next decades, predicting changes in plant development to produce biomass and yield would provide valuable information for growers and breeders.
Author Contributions
LG and SA wrote the MS. JF is the first author of CW grapevine papers and Ph.D. thesis in which this review is based. All authors approved the final version to be published.
Funding
This work was supported by LEAF research center, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment
The authors are indebted to the students and collaborators from LEAF and University of Léon, Spain, which contributed to experimental work.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.01439/full#supplementary-material
References
Albersheim, P., Nevins, D. J., English, P. D., and Karr, A. (1967). A method for the analysis of sugars in plant cell-wall polysaccharides by gas-liquid chromatography. Carbohydr. Res. 5, 340–345. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)80510-8
Alonso-Simón, A., Encina, A. E., García-Angulo, P., Álvarez, J. M., and Acebes, J. L. (2004). FTIR spectroscopy monitoring of cell wall modifications during the habituation of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) callus cultures to dichlobenil. Plant Sci. 167, 1273–1281. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.06.025
Amtmann, A., and Armengaud, P. (2009). Effects of N, P, K and S on metabolism: new knowledge gained from multi–level analysis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.014
Atkinson, N. J., and Urwin, P. E. (2012). The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 3523–3543. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers100
Balzergue, C., Dartevelle, T., Godon, C., Laugier, E., Meisrimler, C., Teulon, J. M., et al. (2017). Low phosphate activates STOP1-ALMT1 to rapidly inhibit root cell elongation. Nat. Commun. 8:15300. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15300
Bellincampi, D., Camardella, L., Delcour, J. A., Desseaux, V., D’Ovidio, R., Durand, A., et al. (2004). Potential physiological role of plant glycosidase inhibitors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1696, 265–274. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2003.10.011
Bethke, G., Thao, A., Xiong, G., Li, B., Soltis, N. E., Hatsugai, N., et al. (2016). Pectin biosynthesis is critical for cell wall integrity and immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 28, 537–556. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00404
Bootten, T. J., Harris, P. J., Melton, L. D., and Newman, R. H. (2004). Solid-state NMR spectroscopy shows that the xyloglucans in the primary cell walls of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) occur in different domains: a new model for xyloglucan–cellulose interactions in the cell wall. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 571–583. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh065
Bosca, S., Barton, C. J., Taylor, N. G., Ryden, P., Neumetzler, L., Pauly, M., et al. (2006). Interactions between MUR10/CesA7 dependent secondary cellulose biosynthesis and primary cell wall structure. Plant Physiol. 142, 1353–1363. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.087700
Bosch, M., and Hepler, P. K. (2005). Pectin methylesterases and pectin dynamics in pollen tubes. Plant Cell 17, 3219–3226. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.037473
Brummell, D. A., and Harpster, M. H. (2001). Cell wall metabolism in fruit softening and quality and its manipulation in transgenic plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 47, 311–340. doi: 10.1023/A:1010656104304
Caffall, K. H., and Mohnen, D. (2009). The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 344, 1879–1900. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2009.05.021
Carpita, N., Tierney, M., and Campbell, M. (2001). Molecular biology of the plant cell wall: searching for the genes that define structure, architecture and dynamics. Plant Mol. Biol. 47, 1–5. doi: 10.1023/A:1010603527077
Carpita, N. C., and Gibeaut, D. M. (1993). Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J. 3, 1–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.tb00007.x
Castro, A. J., Carapito, C., Zorn, N., Magné, C., Leize, E., Dorsselaer, A. V., et al. (2005). Proteomic analysis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) tissues subjected to herbicide stress. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 2783–2795. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri271
Chebli, Y., and Geitmann, A. (2017). Cellular growth in plants requires regulation of cell wall biochemistry. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 44, 28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.01.002
Choi, D., Cho, H. T., and Lee, Y. (2006). Expansins: expanding importance in plant growth and development. Physiol. Plant. 126, 511–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00612.x
Coimbra, M. A., Barros, A., Rutledge, D. N., and Delgadillo, I. (1999). FTIR spectroscopy as a tool for the analysis of olive pulp cell-wall polysaccharide extracts. Carbohydr. Res. 317, 145–154. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6215(99)00071-3
Cooke, J. E. K., Brown, K. A., Wu, R., and Davis, J. M. (2003). Gene expression associated with N-induced shifts in resource allocation in poplar. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 757–770. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01012.x
Cosgrove, D. J. (1997). Assembly and enlargement of the primary cell wall in plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 171–201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.171
Cosgrove, D. J. (1999). Enzymes and other agents that enhance cell wall extensibility. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 391–417. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.391
Cosgrove, D. J. (2000). Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins. Nature 407, 321–326. doi: 10.1038/35030000
Cosgrove, D. J. (2001). Wall structure and wall loosening. A look backwards and forwards. Plant Physiol. 125, 131–134. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.1.131
Cosgrove, D. J. (2005). Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 850–861. doi: 10.1038/nrm1746
Cosgrove, D. J. (2014). Re-constructing our models of cellulose and primary cell wall assembly. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 22, 122–131. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.11.001
Cosgrove, D. J., and Jarvis, M. C. (2012). Comparative structure and biomechanics of plant primary and secondary cell walls. Front. Plant Sci. 3:204. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00204
DeLuc, L. G., Grimplet, J., Wheatley, M. D., Tillett, R. L., Quilici, D. R., Osborne, C., et al. (2007). Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry development. BMC Genomics 8:429. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-429
Derbyshire, P., McCann, M. C., and Roberts, K. (2007). Restricted cell elongation in Arabidopsis hypocotyls is associated with a reduced average pectin esterification level. BMC Plant. Biol. 7:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-31
Desprez, T., Juraniec, M., Crowell, E. F., Jouy, H., Pochylova, Z., Parcy, F., et al. (2007). Organization of cellulose synthase complexes involved in primary cell wall synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 15572–15577. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706569104
Di Matteo, A., Giovane, A., Raiola, A., Camardella, L., Bonivento, D., De Lorenzo, G., et al. (2005). Structural basis for the interaction between pectin methylesterase and a specific inhibitor protein. Plant Cell 17, 849–858. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.028886
Dick-Perez, M., Zhang, Y., Hayes, J., Salazar, A., Zabotina, O. A., and Hong, M. (2011). Structure and interactions of plant cell-wall polysaccharides by two- and three-dimensional magic angle-spinning solid state NMR. Biochemistry 50, 989–1000. doi: 10.1021/bi101795q
Eklöf, J. M., and Brumer, H. (2010). The XTH gene family: an update on enzyme structure, function, and phylogeny in xyloglucan remodeling. Plant Physiol. 153, 456–466. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156844
Endler, A., and Persson, S. (2011). Cellulose synthases and synthesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 4, 199–211. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq079
Farkas, V., and Maclachlan, G. (1988). Stimulation of pea 1,4-β-glucanase activity by oligosaccharides derived from xyloglucan. Carbohydr. Res. 184, 213–219. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(88)80019-3
Farrokhi, N., Burton, R. A., Brownfield, L., Hrmova, M., Wilson, S. M. A., and Fincher, G. B. (2006). Plant cell wall biosynthesis: genetic, biochemical and functional genomics approaches to the identification of key genes. Plant Biotechnol. J. 4, 145–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00169.x
Fernandes, J., Cobb, F., Tracana, S., Costa, G. J., Valente, I., Goulao, L. F., et al. (2015). Relating water deficiency to berry texture, skin cell wall composition, and expression of remodeling genes in two Vitis vinifera L. varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 63, 3951–3961. doi: 10.1021/jf505169z
Fernandes, J., Tavares, S., and Amâncio, S. (2009). Identification and expression of cytokinin signaling and meristem identity genes in sulfur deficient grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Signal. Behav. 4, 1128–1135. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.12.9942
Fernandes, J. C. (2015). Mineral Stress Response of Vitis Cell Wall Transcriptome: Identification, Characterization and Expression of Genes From Key Families Involved in Wall Biosynthesis and Modification. Ph.D. thesis, University of Lisbon, Lisbon.
Fernandes, J. C., García-Angulo, P., Goulao, L. F., Acebes, J. L., and Amâncio, S. (2013). Mineral stress affects the cell wall composition of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) callus. Plant Sci. 205-206, 111–120. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.01.013
Fernandes, J. C., Goulao, L. F., and Amâncio, S. (2016a). Immunolocalization of cell wall polymers in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) internodes under nitrogen, phosphorus or sulfur deficiency. J. Plant Res. 129, 1151–1163. doi: 10.1007/s10265-016-0851-y
Fernandes, J. C., Goulao, L. F., and Amâncio, S. (2016b). Regulation of cell wall remodeling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) callus under individual mineral stress deficiency. J. Plant Physiol. 190, 95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.10.007
Fry, S. C. (1986). Cross–linking of matrix polymers in the growing cell walls of angiosperms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 37, 165–186. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.37.060186.001121
Fujita, M., Himmelspach, R., Hocart, C. H., Williamson, R. E., Mansfield, S. D., and Wasteneys, G. O. (2011). Cortical microtubules optimize cell-wall crystallinity to drive unidirectional growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 66, 915–928. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04552.x
Giovannoni, J. J. (2004). Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 16(Suppl.), S170–S180. doi: 10.1105/tpc.019158
Giribaldi, M., and Giuffrida, M. G. (2010). Heard it through the grapevine: proteomic perspective on grape and wine. J. Proteomics 73, 1647–1655. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.05.002
Glass, M., Barkwill, S., Unda, F., and Mansfield, S. D. (2015). Endo-β-1,4-glucanases impact plant cell wall development by influencing cellulose crystallization. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 57, 396–410. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12353
Goulao, L. F. (2010). Pectin de–esterification and fruit softening: revisiting a classical hypothesis. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 6, 1–12. doi: 10.2212/spr.2010.1.7
Grimplet, J., Deluc, L. G., Tillett, R. L., Wheatley, M. D., Schlauch, K. A., Cramer, G. R., et al. (2007). Tissue-specific mRNA expression profiling in grape berry tissues. BMC Genomics 8:187. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-187
Handakumbura, P. P., Matos, D. A., Osmont, K. S., Harrington, M. J., Heo, K., Kafle, K., et al. (2013). Perturbation of Brachypodium distachyon CELLULOSE SYNTHASE A4 or 7 results in abnormal cell walls. BMC Plant Biol. 13:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-131
Hanus, J., and Mazeau, K. (2006). The xyloglucan–cellulose assembly at the atomic scale. Biopolymers 81, 59–73. doi: 10.1002/bip.20460
Harholt, J., Suttangkakul, A., and Vibe Scheller, H. (2010). Biosynthesis of pectin. Plant Physiol. 153, 384–395. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156588
Hirsinger, C., Parmentier, Y., Durr, A., Fleck, J., and Jamet, E. (1997). Characterization of a tobacco extensin gene and regulation of its gene family in healthy plants and under various stress conditions. Plant Mol. Biol. 33, 279–289. doi: 10.1023/A:1005738815383
His, I., Driouich, A., Nicol, F., Jauneau, A., and Höfte, H. (2001). Altered pectin composition in primary cell walls of korrigan, a dwarf mutant of Arabidopsis deficient in a membrane-bound endo-1,4-β-glucanase. Planta 212, 348–358. doi: 10.1007/s004250000437
Hohl, M., and Schopfer, P. (1992). Physical extensibility of maize coleoptile cell walls: apparent plastic extensibility is due to elastic hysteresis. Planta 187, 498–504. doi: 10.1007/BF00199968
Hongo, S., Sato, K., Yokoyama, R., and Nishitani, K. (2012). Demethylesterification of the primary wall by PECTIN METHYLESTERASE35 provides mechanical support to the Arabidopsis stem. Plant Cell 24, 2624–2634. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.099325
Houston, K., Tucker, M. R., Chowdhury, J., Shirley, N., and Little, A. (2016). The plant cell wall: a complex and dynamic structure as revealed by the responses of genes under stress conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 7:984. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00984
Iurlaro, A., De Caroli, M., Sabella, E., De Pascali, M., Rampino, P., De Bellis, L., et al. (2016). Drought and Heat differentially affect XTH expression and XET activity and action in 3-day-old seedlings of durum wheat cultivars with different stress susceptibility. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1686. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01686
Jackson, P., Galinha, C., Pereira, C., Fortunato, A., Soares, N., Amâncio, S., et al. (2001). Rapid deposition of extensin during the elicitation of grapevine callus cultures is specifically catalysed by a 40 kDa peroxidase. Plant Physiol. 127, 1065–1076. doi: 10.1104/pp.010192
Jaillon, O., Aury, J. M., Noel, B., Policriti, A., Clepet, C., Casagrande, A., et al. (2007). The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449, 463–467. doi: 10.1038/nature06148
Jarvis, M. C. (1984). Structure and properties of pectin gels in plant cell walls. Plant Cell Environ. 7, 153–164. doi: 10.1111/1365-3040.ep11614586
Jellouli, N., Jouira, B. H., Skouri, H., Ghorbel, A., Gourgouri, A., and Mliki, A. (2008). Proteomic analysis of Tunisian grapevine cultivar Razegui under salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 165, 471–481. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.02.009
Jolie, R. P., Duvetter, T., Van Loey, A. M., and Hendrickx, M. E. (2010). Pectin methylesterase and its proteinaceous inhibitor: a review. Carbohydr. Res. 345, 2583–2595. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2010.10.002
Juge, N. (2006). Plant protein inhibitors of cell wall degrading enzymes. Trends Plant Sci. 11, 359–367. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.05.006
Kačuráková, M., Capek, P., Sasinková, V., Wellner, N., and Ebringerová, A. (2000). FT-IR study of plant cell wall model compounds: pectic polysaccharides and hemicelluloses. Carbohydr. Polym. 43, 195–203. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00151-X
Kaewthai, N., Gendre, D., Eklöf, J. M., Ibatullin, F. M., Ezcurra, I., Bhalerao, R. P., et al. (2013). Group IIIA XTH genes of Arabidopsis encode predominant xyloglucan endohydrolases that are dispensable for normal growth. Plant Physiol. 161, 440–454. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.207308
Kavanová, M., Lattanzi, F. A., Grimoldi, A. A., and Schnyder, H. (2006). Phosphorus deficiency decreases cell division and elongation in grass leaves. Plant Physiol. 141, 766–775. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.079699
Lai-Kee-Him, J., Chanzy, H., Muller, M., Putaux, J., Imai, T., and Bulone, V. (2002). In vitro versus in vivo cellulose microfibrils from plant primary wall synthases: structural differences. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 36931–36939. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203530200
Le Gall, H., Philippe, F., Domon, J.-M., Gillet, F., Pelloux, J., and Rayon, C. (2015). Cell wall metabolism in response to abiotic stress. Plants 4, 112–166. doi: 10.3390/plants4010112
Lerouxel, O., Cavalier, D. M., Liepman, A. H., and Keegstra, K. (2006). Biosynthesis of plant cell wall polysaccharides a complex process. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9, 621–630. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.09.009
Liepman, A. H., Cavalier, D. M., Lerouxel, O., and Keegstra, K. (2007). “Cell wall structure biosynthesis and assembly,” in Plant Cell Separation and Adhesion, eds J. A. Roberts and Z. Gonzalez-Carranza (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing), 8–39.
Lopez-Sanchez, P., Martinez-Sanz, M., Bonilla, M. R., Wang, D., Gilbert, E. P., Stokes, J. R., et al. (2017). Cellulose-pectin composite hydrogels: intermolecular interactions and material properties depend on order of assembly. Carbohydr. Polym. 162, 71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.049
Marcus, S. E., Verhertbruggen, Y., Hervé, C., Ordaz-Ortiz, J. J., Farkas, V., Pedersen, H. L., et al. (2008). Pectic homogalacturonan masks abundant sets of xyloglucan epitopes in plant cell walls. BMC Plant Biol. 8:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-60
Markovic, O., and Janecek, S. (2004). Pectin methylesterases: sequence-structural features and phylogenetic relationships. Carbohydr. Res. 339, 2281–2295. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2004.06.023
Matsui, A., Yokoyama, R., Seki, M., Ito, T., Shinozaki, K., Takahashi, T., et al. (2005). AtXTH27 plays an essential role in cell wall modification during the development of tracheary elements. Plant J. 42, 525–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02395.x
McDougall, G. J., and Fry, S. C. (1990). Xyloglucan oligosaccharides promote growth and activate cellulase. Evidence for a role of cellulase in cell expansion. Plant Physiol. 93, 1042–1048. doi: 10.1104/pp.93.3.1042
McQueen-Mason, S. J., and Cosgrove, D. J. (1995). Expansin mode of action on cell walls. Analysis of wall hydrolysis, stress relaxation and binding. Plant Physiol. 107, 87–100. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.1.87
Micheli, F. (2001). Pectin methylesterases: cell wall enzymes with important roles in plant physiology. Trends Plant Sci. 6, 414–419. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02045-3
Miedes, E., Herbers, K., Sonnewald, U., and Lorences, E. P. (2010). Overexpression of a cell wall enzyme reduces xyloglucan depolymerization and softening of transgenic tomato fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 5708–5713. doi: 10.1021/jf100242z
Miedes, E., Suslov, D., Vandenbussche, F., Kenobi, K., Ivakov, A., Van Der Straeten, D., et al. (2013). Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) overexpression affects growth and cell wall mechanics in etiolated Arabidopsis hypocotyls. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 2481–2497. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert107
Mittler, R. (2006). Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci. 11, 15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002
Mittler, R., and Blumwald, E. (2010). Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 443–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112116
Nicol, F., His, I., Jauneau, A., Vernhettes, S., Canut, H., and Höfte, H. (1998). A plasma membrane-bound putative endo-1,4-beta-D-glucanase is required for normal wall assembly and cell elongation in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 17, 5563–5576. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5563
Nuñez, A., Fishman, M. L., Fortis, L. L., Cooke, P. H., and Hotchkiss, A. T. J. (2009). Identification of extensin protein associated with sugar beet pectin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57, 10951–10958. doi: 10.1021/jf902162t
Osato, Y., Yokoyama, R., and Nishitani, K. (2006). A principal role for AtXTH18 in Arabidopsis thaliana root growth – a functional analysis using RNAi plants. J. Plant Res. 119, 153–162. doi: 10.1007/s10265-006-0262-6
Palmer, S. J., Berridge, D. M., McDonald, A. J. S., and Davies, W. J. (1996). Control of leaf expansion in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by nitrogen nutrition. J. Exp. Bot. 47, 359–368. doi: 10.1093/jxb/44.1.155
Park, Y. B., and Cosgrove, D. J. (2012). A revised architecture of primary cell walls based on biomechanical changes induced by substrate-specific endoglucanases. Plant Physiol. 158, 1933–1943. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.192880
Park, Y. B., and Cosgrove, D. J. (2015). Xyloglucan and its interactions with other components of the growing cell wall. Plant Cell Physiol. 56, 180–194. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu204
Peaucelle, A., Braybrook, S., and Hofte, H. (2012). Cell wall mechanics and growth control in plants: the role of pectins revisited. Front. Plant Sci. 3:121. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00121
Peaucelle, A., Braybrook, S. A., Le Guillou, L., Bron, E., Kuhlemeier, C., and Höfte, H. (2011). Pectin-induced changes in cell wall mechanics underlie organ initiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 21, 1720–1726. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.057
Peaucelle, A., Louvet, R., Johansen, J. N., Hofte, H., Laufs, P., Pellou, X. J., et al. (2008). Arabidopsis phyllotaxis is controlled by the methyl-esterification status of cell-wall pectins. Curr. Biol. 18, 1943–1948. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.065
Pelloux, J., Rustérucci, C., and Mellerowicz, E. J. (2007). New insights into pectin methylesterase structure and function. Trends Plant Sci. 12, 267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.001
Pieczywek, P. M., Kozioł, A., Konopacka, D., Cybulska, J., and Zdunek, A. (2017). Changes in cell wall stiffness and microstructure in ultrasonically treated apple. J. Food Eng. 197, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.10.028
Pilling, E., and Höfte, H. (2003). Feedback from the wall. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 611–616. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2003.09.004
Pitre, F. E., Lafarguette, F., Boyle, B., Pavy, N., Caron, S., Dallaire, N., et al. (2010). High nitrogen fertilization and tension wood induction have overlapping effects on wood formation in poplar but invoke largely distinct molecular pathways. Tree Physiol. 30, 1273–1289. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpq073
Plavcová, L., Hacke, U. G., Almeida-Rodriguez, A. M., Li, E., and Douglas, C. J. (2012). Gene expression patterns underlying changes in xylem structure and function in response to increased nitrogen availability in hybrid poplar. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 186–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02566.x
Popper, Z. A., and Fry, S. C. (2005). Widespread occurrence of a covalent linkage between xyloglucan and acidic polysaccharides in suspension-cultured angiosperm cells. Ann. Bot. 96, 91–99. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci153
Qi, X. Y., Behrens, B. X., West, P. R., and Mort, A. J. (1995). Solubilization and partial characterization of extensin fragments from cell walls of cotton suspension-cultures, evidence for a covalent cross-link between extensin and pectin. Plant Physiol. 108, 1691–1701. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.4.1691
Ralet, M.-C., Crépeau, M.-J., Vigouroux, J., Tran, J., Berger, A., Sallé, C., et al. (2016). Xylans provide the structural driving force for mucilage adhesion to the Arabidopsis seed coat. Plant Physiol. 171, 165–178. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00211
Richmond, T. A., and Somerville, C. R. (2000). The cellulose synthase superfamily. Plant Physiol. 124, 495–498. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.2.495
Sampedro, J., Gianzo, C., Iglesias, N., Guitián, E., Revilla, G., and Zarra, I. (2012). AtBGAL10 is the main xyloglucan β-galactosidase in Arabidopsis, and its absence results in unusual xyloglucan sub-units and growth defects. Plant Physiol. 158, 1146–1157. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.192195
Sampedro, J., Pardo, B., Gianzo, C., Guitián, E., Revilla, G., and Zarra, I. (2010). Lack of α-xylosidase activity in Arabidopsis alters xyloglucan composition and results in growth defects. Plant Physiol. 154, 1105–1115. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.163212
Sarry, J.-E., Sommerer, N., Sauvage, F.-X., Bergoin, A., Rossignol, M., Albagnac, G., et al. (2004). Grape berry biochemistry revisited upon proteomic analysis of the mesocarp. Proteomics 4, 201–215. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300499
Sato, S., Kato, T., Kakegawa, K., Ishii, T., Liu, Y. G., Awano, T., et al. (2001). Role of the putative membrane-bound endo-1,4-β-glucanase KORRIGAN in cell elongation and cellulose synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 251–263. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pce045
Shinohara, N., Sunagawa, N., Tamura, S., Yokoyama, R., Ueda, M., Igarashi, M., et al. (2017). The plant cell-wall enzyme AtXTH3 catalyses covalent cross-linking between cellulose and cello-oligosaccharide. Sci. Rep. 7:46099. doi: 10.1038/srep46099
Showalter, A. M. (1993). Structure and function of plant cell wall proteins. Plant Cell 5, 9–23. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.1.9
Showalter, A. M., Butt, A. D., and Kim, S. (1992). Molecular details of tomato extensin and glycine-rich protein gene expression. Plant Mol. Biol. 19, 205–215. doi: 10.1007/BF00027342
Snir, N., and Neumann, P. M. (1997). Mineral nutrient supply, cell wall adjustment and the control of leaf growth. Plant Cell Environ. 20, 239–246. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-57.x
Somerville, C. (2006). Cellulose synthesis in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 53–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.022206.160206
Suzuki, S., Li, L., Sun, Y. H., and Chiang, V. L. (2006). The cellulose synthase genes superfamily and biochemical functions of xylem-specific cellulose synthase-like genes in Populus trichocarpa. Plant Physiol. 142, 1233–1245. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.086678
Takahashi, H., Braby, C. E., and Grossman, A. R. (2001). Sulfur economy and cell wall biosynthesis during sulfur limitation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 127, 665–673. doi: 10.1104/pp.010257
Takahashi, J., Rudsander, U. J., Hedenström, M., Banasiak, A., Harholt, J., Amelot, N., et al. (2009). KORRIGAN1 and its aspen homolog PttCel9A1 decrease cellulose crystallinity in Arabidopsis stems. Plant Cell Physiol. 50, 1099–1115. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp062
Taylor, G., McDonald, A. J. S., Stadenberg, I., and Ereer Smith, P. H. (1993). Nitrate supply and the biophysics of leaf growth in Salix viminalis. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 155–164. doi: 10.1093/jxb/44.1.155
Tenhaken, R. (2015). Cell wall remodeling under abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 5:771. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00771
Triplett, E. W., Heitholt, J. J., Evensen, K. B., and Blevins, D. G. (1981). Increase in internode length of Phaseolus lunatus L. caused by inoculation with a nitrate reductase-deficient strain of Rhizobium sp. Plant Physiol. 67, 1–4. doi: 10.1104/pp.67.1.1
Tschoep, H., Gibon, Y., Carillo, P., Armengaud, P., Szecowka, M., Nunes–Nesi, A., et al. (2009). Adjustment of growth and central metabolism to a mild but sustained nitrogen limitation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 300–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01921.x
Ueda, A., Yamamoto-Yamane, Y., and Takabe, T. (2007). Salt stress enhances proline utilization in the apical region of barley roots. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 355, 61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.098
Ulvskov, P., Wium, H., Bruce, D., Jorgensen, B., Qvist, K. B., Skjot, M., et al. (2005). Biophysical consequences of remodeling the neutral side chains of rhamnogalacturonan I in tubers of transgenic potatoes. Planta 220, 609–620. doi: 10.1007/s00425-004-1373-8
Urbanowicz, B. R., Bennett, A. B., del Campillo, E., Catalá, C., Hayashi, T., Henrissat, B., et al. (2007a). Structural organization and a standardized nomenclature for plant endo-1,4-beta-glucanases (cellulases) of glycosyl hydrolase family 9. Plant Physiol. 144, 1693–1696. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.102574
Urbanowicz, B. R., Catalá, C., Irwin, D., Wilson, D. B., Ripoll, D. R., and Rose, J. K. C. (2007b). A tomato endo-β-1,4-glucanase, SlCel9C1, represents a distinct subclass with a new family of carbohydrate binding modules (CBM49). J. Biol. Chem. 282, 12066–12074. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M607925200
Vain, T., Crowell, E. F., Timpano, H., Biot, E., Desprez, T., Mansoori, N., et al. (2014). The cellulase KORRIGAN is part of the cellulose synthase complex. Plant Physiol. 165, 1521–1532. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.241216
Van Sandt, V. S., Suslov, D., Verbelen, J. P., and Vissenberg, K. (2007). Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase activity loosens a plant cell wall. Ann. Bot. 100, 1467–1473. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm248
Velasco, R., Zharkikh, A., Troggio, M., Cartwright, D. A., Cestaro, A., Pruss, D., et al. (2007). A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. PLoS ONE 2:e1326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001326
Vincent, D., Ergul, A., Bohlman, M. C., Tattersall, E. A., Tillett, R. L., Wheatley, M. D., et al. (2007). Proteomic analysis reveals differences between Vitis vinifera L. cv. Chardonnay and cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and their responses to water deficit and salinity. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1873–1892. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm012
Vissenberg, K., Fry, S. C., and Verbelen, J.-P. (2001). Root hair initiation is coupled to a highly localized increase of xyloglucan endotransglycoslyase action in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 127, 1125–1135. doi: 10.1104/pp.010295
Vorwerk, S., Somerville, S., and Somerville, C. (2004). The role of plant cell wall polysaccharide composition in disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.02.005
Wakabayashi, K., Soga, K., Kamisaka, S., and Hoson, T. (2003). Modification of cell wall architecture of wheat coleoptiles grown under hypergravity conditions. Biol. Sci. Space 17, 228–229.
Wang, T., Park, Y. B., Caporini, M. A., Rosay, M., Zhong, L., Cosgrove, D. J., et al. (2013). Sensitivity enhanced solid-state NMR detection of expansin’s target in plant cell walls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 16444–16449. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316290110
Wang, T., Zabotina, O., and Hong, M. (2012). Pectin-cellulose interactions in the Arabidopsis primary cell wall from two-dimensional magic angle-spinning solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance. Biochemistry 51, 9846–9856. doi: 10.1021/bi3015532
Watanabe, M., Hubberten, H.-M., Saito, K., and Hoefgen, R. (2010). General regulatory patterns of plant mineral nutrient depletion as revealed by serat quadruple mutants disturbed in cysteine synthesis. Molecular Plant 3, 438–466. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq009
Whitney, S. E. C., Gidley, M. J., and McQueen-Mason, S. J. (2000). Probing expansin action using cellulose/hemicellulose composites. Plant J. 22, 327–334. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00742.x
Willats, W. G., McCartney, L., Mackie, W., and Knox, J. P. (2001). Pectin: cell biology and prospects for functional analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. 47, 9–27. doi: 10.1023/A:1010662911148
Wilson, M. H., Holman, T. J., Sorensen, I., Cancho-Sanchez, E., Wells, D. M., Swarup, R., et al. (2015). Multiomics analysis identifies genes mediating the extension of cell walls in the Arabidopsis thaliana root elongation zone. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 3:10. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2015.00010
Wolf, S., Hématy, K., and Höfte, H. (2012). Growth control and cell wall signaling in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 381–407. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105449
Zeng, H., Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Hu, X., Pi, E., Zhu, Y., et al. (2016). Genome-wide identification of phosphate-deficiency-responsive genes in soybean roots by high-throughput sequencing. Plant Soil 398, 207–227. doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2657-4
Zenoni, S., Ferrarini, A., Giacomelli, E., Xumerle, L., Fasoli, M., Malerba, G., et al. (2010). Characterization of transcriptional complexity during berry development in Vitis vinifera using RNA-Seq. Plant Physiol. 152, 1787–1795. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.149716
Zhong, R., and Ye, Z.-H. (2007). Regulation of cell wall biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10, 564–572. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.09.001
Zhu, X. F., Lei, G. J., Jiang, T., Liu, Y., Li, G. X., and Zheng, S. J. (2012). Cell wall polysaccharides are involved in P-deficiency-induced Cd exclusion in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 236, 989–997. doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1652-8
Zykwinska, A., Ralet, M. C., Garnier, C., and Thibault, J. F. (2005). Evidence for in vitro binding of pectic side chains to cellulose. Plant Physiol. 139, 397–407. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.065912
Zykwinska, A., Thibault, J.-F., and Ralet, M.-C. (2007). Organization of pectic arabinan and galactan side chains in association with cellulose microfibrils in primary cell walls and related models envisaged. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1795–1802. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm037
Keywords: biomechanical hotspots, cell wall epitopes, cellulose, gene expression, Vitis vinifera L., pectin (d)esterification, xyloglucan
Citation: Goulao LF, Fernandes JC and Amâncio S (2017) How the Depletion in Mineral Major Elements Affects Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Primary Cell Wall. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1439. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01439
Received: 07 June 2017; Accepted: 03 August 2017;
Published: 21 August 2017.
Edited by:
Gea Guerriero, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, LuxembourgReviewed by:
Rosemary White, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), AustraliaCéline Faugeron Girard, University of Limoges, France
Copyright © 2017 Goulao, Fernandes and Amâncio. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sara Amâncio, c2FtcG9ydEBpc2EudWxpc2JvYS5wdA==