ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol.

Sec. Exercise Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1588339

Effects of Kinesiology Taping Timing on Recovery in the Lower Limbs

Provisionally accepted
Chia-Yu  TangChia-Yu Tang1Ying-Che  HuangYing-Che Huang2Fu-Shun  HsuFu-Shun Hsu3,4,5Chia-Hsien  YuChia-Hsien Yu4Chang-Chi  LaiChang-Chi Lai4SzuKai  FuSzuKai Fu4*
  • 1Graduate Institute of Sports Training, University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 2Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 3Department of Urology, Yangming Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
  • 4Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 5Department of Urology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Kinesiology taping (KT) is widely used to support muscle function and recovery, but its optimal application timing remains unclear. While some suggest pre-exercise KT provides protective benefits, others propose post-exercise KT aids recovery. Eccentric contractions often lead to eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD), causing strength loss, soreness, and reduced range of motion. Whether KT timing influences its effectiveness in mitigating or accelerating EIMD recovery requires further investigation.Purpose: This study examined whether KT, applied before (KT-pre) or after (KT-post) eccentric exercise of the knee extensors, could mitigate or hasten recovery from EIMD in the lower limbs.Methods: 12 healthy adult males (22.0 ± 1.7 years) participated in a repeated-measures crossover study under three conditions: KT-pre, KT-post, and a no-taping control (CON). Participants performed 72 eccentric contractions of the knee extensors on the non-dominant leg using an isokinetic dynamometer. Outcome measures included maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) normalized to body weight, rate of force development (RFD) in the 0-200 ms interval, neuromuscular efficiency (NME, defined as the ratio of peak torque to integrated electromyography), active ROM of knee flexion (measured via goniometry), and subjective muscle soreness (100-mm visual analogue scale). Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 0-, 24-, and 48-hours post-exercise.Results: When expressed as a percentage of baseline, both peak torque and RFD in the 0-200 ms interval declined significantly at 0-and 24-hours post-exercise (p < .05) in all groups, with no significant intergroup differences. The iEMG parameter remained unchanged. NME declined significantly at 0 hours (p < .05) in all conditions; however, at 24 hours, the KT-pre group exhibited significantly higher NME than the control (79.3% ± 12.8% vs. 94.4% ± 17.4%, p = 0.0052). Active ROM decreased and subjective muscle soreness increased significantly at 0 and 24 hours (p < .05) across all groups, with no significant intergroup differences.Although KT-pre demonstrated a short-term protective effect immediately after eccentric exercise, neither pre-nor post-exercise taping significantly mitigated muscle damage or enhanced recovery. Further research is needed to clarify KT's long-term benefits and its effects on EIMD in other muscle groups.

Keywords: EIMD, Efficiency, Kinesiology taping, neuromuscular recovery strategy, rate of force development

Received: 05 Mar 2025; Accepted: 15 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tang, Huang, Hsu, Yu, Lai and Fu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: SzuKai Fu, Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more