ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol.

Sec. Environmental, Aviation and Space Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1558471

Blunted cardiovascular responses in individuals with type 2 diabetes and hypertension during cold and heat exposure

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Troms, Norway
  • 2Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Troms, Norway
  • 3Research Unit of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland
  • 4Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, Oulu, Finland
  • 5Research Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland
  • 6Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA, Texas, United States
  • 7Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, Oulu, Finland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: The effect of type 2 diabetes (T2D) on indices of cardiovascular function during exposure to cold or hot environmental temperatures is not well known. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the effect of short-term whole-body cold and heat exposure on the cardiovascular responses in individuals with T2D.Material and methods: 20 participants aged 40-79 years (10 T2D with hypertension, and 10 controls) underwent 90 minutes of whole-body exposure to cold (10°C; 10% relative humidity) and heat (40°C; 50% relative humidity) in a randomized sequence on differing days. Central and brachial blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and skin blood flow were measured before, during, and after the exposure. Results: During cold exposure, subjects with T2D exhibited a smaller increase in central (14 (CI 95%:3, 23) vs. 43 (CI 95%:32, 53) mmHg, p < 0.05) and brachial systolic BP (12 (CI 95%:1, 22)) vs. 40 (CI 95%:30, 51) mm Hg, p < 0.05) compared to controls. The corresponding reduction in HR in the cold was also less in T2D compared to controls (5 (CI 95%:-10 , 0.02) vs. 9 (CI 95%:-14, -4) bpm, p < 0.05). Heat exposure reduced central and brachial BP similarly in both groups. However, the heatrelated increase in HR was less pronounced in T2D subjects compared to controls (7 (CI 95%:1, 13) vs. 14 (CI 95%: 9, 19) bpm, p < 0.05). Finally, the magnitude of the increase in skin blood flow was less in the heat in T2D subjects (+210 (CI 95%:-41, 461) vs. +605 (CI 95%: 353, 855) PU, p < 0.05).Discussion: T2D attenuated cardiovascular responses, such as BP and HR during short-term exposure to cold, and HR and skin blood flow during short-term exposure to heat. These observations suggest impaired capacity to respond to environmental temperature extremes in individuals with T2D.

Keywords: Type 2 diabetes1, cold exposure2, heat exposure3, cardiovascular responses4, blood pressure5, heart rate6, rate pressure product7, subendocardial viability ratio8

Received: 10 Jan 2025; Accepted: 09 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Rafieian, Farbu, Höper, Valtonen, Hyrkäs-Palmu, Perkiömäki, Crandall, Jaakkola and Ikäheimo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Tiina Maria Ikäheimo, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, 9019, Troms, Norway

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more