Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol.
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1555019

A study on the effects of modified sprint interval trainingon physical fitness test scores and the quantitative and dose-response relationships among Chinese male university students

Provisionally accepted
Guoyuan Huang Guoyuan Huang 1,2*Yang Chen Yang Chen 1ByungChan Lee ByungChan Lee 3*Yipeng Qiu Yipeng Qiu 4Aqiang Mao Aqiang Mao 2Maolong Liang Maolong Liang 1Maojie Liu Maojie Liu 1
  • 1 School of Physical Education, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, China
  • 2 Ya'an Key Laboratory of Sports Human Science and National Fitness Promotion, Yaan, China
  • 3 Chungwoon University Department of Physical education, Hongseong, South Chungcheong, Republic of Korea
  • 4 College of Information Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study primarily investigates the impact of a 6-week Sprint Interval Training (SIT) intervention on the physical fitness test results of male university students, as well as the dose-response relationship in adjusting the experimental protocol. A total of 26 male university students (aged 20 ± 2 years; height 174 ± 7 cm; weight 70 ± 14 kg; mean ± SD) with no systematic training in the past three months, no physiological diseases, and healthy physical condition voluntarily participated in the experiment. The SIT protocol was designed based on a classic Wingate sprint protocol (4-6 x 30 s sprints with 4 m of recovery), and adjustments were made based on the participants' actual adaptation. The final intervention consisted of 6 weeks of training, three times per week, with 2-3 repetitions of 30-s Wingate sprints (Cd = 0.075, resistance on the ergometer = weight/kg x Cd) and 4-5 m of recovery. The results showed significant improvements in key anaerobic capacity indicators after the 6-week intervention: Average Power (AP) increased from 77.4 ± 10.1 to 132.6 ± 21.1 (p < 0.01, Adjusted p<0.03 ment, with a maximum effect size of 3.344), Peak Power (PP) increased from 102.9 ± 14.5 to 189.5 ± 28.8 (p < 0.01, Adjusted p <0.02, maximum effect 3.790), and Time to Peak Power (TTP) decreased from 12.3 ± 3.3 to 9.5 ± 2.6 (p < 0.01), confirming that the intervention enhanced the participants' anaerobic capacity. Additionally, The results of the physical fitness test showed significant improvements: standing long jump (SLJ) increased from 2.31 ± 0.15 m to 2.45 ± 0.18 m (significance level p < 0.01), 50 m sprint time decreased from 7.32 ± 0.42 s to 6.98 ± 0.38 s (significance level p < 0.01), and 1000 m from 235.6 ± 18.4 seconds to 220.3 ± 16.8 seconds (significance level p < 0.01).Other metrics such as Body mass, BMI, Vital capacity, and Pull-ups also showed minor increases. Interestingly.Keywords: college students' physical fitness, Sprint Interval Training , exercise intervention

    Keywords: sprint interval training, Exercise Intervention, college students, Physical Fitness, Physical fitness test

    Received: 03 Jan 2025; Accepted: 05 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Huang, Chen, Lee, Qiu, Mao, Liang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Guoyuan Huang, School of Physical Education, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, China
    ByungChan Lee, Chungwoon University Department of Physical education, Hongseong, South Chungcheong, Republic of Korea

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.