The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Renal Physiology and Pathophysiology
Volume 16 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1541198
Serum Advanced Glycation End Products as a Putative Biomarker in Type2 DKD Patients' Prognosis
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Endocrinology and Nephrology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- 2 Majiapu Community Health Service Center, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
- 3 Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
- 4 Nantong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China
- 5 Fangshan Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- 6 Key Laboratory of Internal Medicine, Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Aim: Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are pivotal mediators in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). However, their prognostic utility remains underexplored. This study introduced corrected lgAGEs [novel biomarker derived by adjusting logarithmically transformed AGEs (lgAGEs) levels based on serum albumin (ALB) levels] to enhance the prediction of adverse renal outcomes in patients with type 2 DKD (T2DKD).In this prospective cohort study, 196 T2DKD patients were followed up longitudinally.Serum AGEs levels were log-transformed and adjusted for ALB to calculate corrected lgAGEs.Participants were stratified into the high-and low-level groups based on the median corrected lgAGEs. The association between corrected lgAGEs and renal outcomes was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to evaluate the predictive performance of corrected lgAGEs alone and in combination with the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR).Results: High level of corrected lgAGEs was independently associated with adverse renal outcomes [hazard ratio (HR), 3.252; 95% confidence interval (CI),1.461-7.243; p = 0.003].Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients in the high-level group(12 months) exhibited significantly shorter median survival times compared with those in the low-level group(50 months) . ROC analysis showed that UACR alone had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.782 (95%CI, 0.705-0.858), with 82.8% sensitivity and 61.5% specificity. Corrected lgAGEs achieved an AUC of 0.725 (95%CI, 0.637-0.814), with 69.0% sensitivity and 76.9% specificity.Combining UACR and corrected lgAGEs improved the specificity to 75.6%, with an AUC of 0.764 (95%CI, 0.682-0.847), while maintaining a sensitivity of 70.7%.Corrected lgAGEs are novel and independent biomarkers for predicting adverse renal outcomes in T2DKD. Combining UACR with corrected lgAGEs could enhance risk stratification by improving the specificity, highlighting its potential application in early identification of high-risk patients. These findings should be validated in broader populations in future research.
Keywords: Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs)1, Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD)2, Corrected lgAGEs3, Urinary Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (UACR)4, Renal prognosis
Received: 07 Dec 2024; Accepted: 14 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Zhang, Wang, Xie, Li, Shen, Yuan, Zhao, Sun and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Luying Sun, Fangshan Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
Wei Jing Liu, Key Laboratory of Internal Medicine, Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100006, Beijing Municipality, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.