Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol.

Sec. Autonomic Neuroscience

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1532992

Peripheral Vasoconstriction is not Elevated During Hyperreactive Responses to the Cold Pressor Test: A Cross-Sectional Study

Provisionally accepted
Jon Stavres Jon Stavres 1*Anabelle Vallecillo Bustos Anabelle Vallecillo Bustos 1Sarah Parnell Sarah Parnell 1Ryan S Aultman Ryan S Aultman 2Ta'Quoris A Newsome Ta'Quoris A Newsome 3Sydney H Swafford Sydney H Swafford 1Abby T Compton Abby T Compton 1Rhett C Schimpf Rhett C Schimpf 1Sophia N Schmidt Sophia N Schmidt 1Carstell Lee Carstell Lee 1Austin J Graybeal Austin J Graybeal 1
  • 1 University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, United States
  • 2 Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, United States
  • 3 University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background. Individuals demonstrating increases in systolic (SBP) or diastolic (DBP) blood pressure of at least 15 mmHg are considered hyperreactors to the cold pressor test (CPT). However, it remains unclear if peripheral vasoconstriction is similarly exaggerated during the CPT in these individuals. Methods. Fifty-five individuals (54.5% non-White, 67.3% female) performed a single-visit study including a two-minute CPT of the foot, a two-minute bout of rhythmic handgrip exercise ([HG] 25% maximal voluntary contraction), and a two-minute combined trial (CPT+HG). Beat-by-beat heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and forearm blood flow (FBF) were continuously recorded, and vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/mean arterial pressure (MAP). Results. Hyperreactors (n=21) demonstrated exaggerated increases in blood pressure and rate pressure product during the CPT compared to normoreactors (n= 34; all p<0.001), while no significant differences were observed for ΔFBF (f=1.33, p=0.259) or ΔFVC responses (f=2.10, p=0.083). Results also indicated a blunted increase in ΔMAP during the CPT+HG trial compared to the CPT only trial in hyperreactors (f=6.95, p<0.001), which was not observed in normoreactors (f=0.982, p=0.420), and a blunted ΔFVC response during the CPT+HG trial in hyperreactors compared to normoreactors (f=2.57, p=0.039). When analyzed separately, the blood pressure responses to HG exercise were also significantly exaggerated in hyperreactors compared to normoreactors (all p<0.001), while ΔFBF and ΔFVC responses were not (both p>0.701). Conclusions. These findings indicate that hyperreactive blood pressure responses to the CPT are not accompanied by increased peripheral vasoconstriction. Moreover, handgrip exercise attenuates hyperreactive blood pressure responses to the CPT.

    Keywords: Vascular conductance, Blood flow, cold stress, sympathetic, Handgrip

    Received: 22 Nov 2024; Accepted: 19 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Stavres, Vallecillo Bustos, Parnell, Aultman, Newsome, Swafford, Compton, Schimpf, Schmidt, Lee and Graybeal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Jon Stavres, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more