![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1525726
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This network meta-analysis and systematic review evaluated the recovery impacts of varying cold water immersion (CWI) protocols on acute exercise-induced muscle damage.Methods: We searched CNKI, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase from January 2000 to September 2024 for randomized controlled trials examining CWI’s recovery effects on acute muscle damage. Data extraction, study screening, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Analyses were performed using Stata 16.0.Results: A total of 55 RCTs were included, with 42 reporting delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), 36 reporting jump performance (JUMP), and 30 reporting creatine kinase (CK) levels. Network meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, MD-MT-CWI: Medium-duration medium-temperature cold water immersion (10-15 min, 11-15°C) [SMD=-1.45, 95%CI(-2.13, -0.77), P<0.01] and MD-LT-CWI: Medium-duration low-temperature cold water immersion (10-15 min, 5-10°C) [SMD=-1.12, 95%CI(-1.78, -0.47), P=0.01] significantly reduced DOMS; MD-LT-CWI (10-15min, 5-10℃) [SMD=0.48, 95%CI(0.20, 0.77), P=0.01] and MD-MT-CWI (10-15min, 11-15℃) [SMD=0.42, 95%CI(0.15, 0.70), P=0.02] significantly improved JUMP; MD-MT-CWI (10-15min, 11-15℃) [SMD=-0.85, 95%CI(-1.36, -0.35), P=0.01] and MD-LT-CWI (10-15min, 5-10℃) [SMD=-0.90, 95%CI(-1.46, -0.34), P=0.02] significantly reduced CK. Cumulative probability ranking showed that MD-LT-CWI (10-15min, 5-10℃) was the most effective for improving JUMP and reducing CK, while MD-MT-CWI (10-15min, 11-15℃) was the most effective for reducing DOMS.Conclusion: Different dosages of cold water immersion (varying in duration and temperature) had different effects on recovery from acute exercise-induced muscle damage. We found that MD-LT-CWI (10-15min, 5-10℃) was most effective for improving biochemical markers (CK) and neuromuscular recovery, while MD-MT-CWI (10-15min, 11-15℃) was most effective for reducing muscle soreness. In practice, we recommend using MD-LT-CWI (10-15min, 5-10℃) and MD-MT-CWI (10-15min, 11-15℃) to reduce Exercise-induced muscle damage(EIMD). However, due to the limitations of the included studies, further high-quality studies are needed to verify these conclusions.
Keywords: Cold water immersion, CWI, muscle damage, Acute Exercise, Meta-analysis
Received: 10 Nov 2024; Accepted: 07 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Wang and Pan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hai Wang, Capital Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China
Lu Wang, Capital Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China
Yingxu Pan, Capital Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.