The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Exercise Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1506325
This article is part of the Research Topic Acute and Chronic Responses to Heat Stress to Optimize Health and Performance View all 4 articles
Work rate adjustments needed to maintain heart rate and RPE during high-intensity interval training in the heat
Provisionally accepted- 1 New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
- 2 University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, United States
- 3 Mercer University, Macon, Georgia, United States
Higher work rates may be sustainable when maintaining target rating of perceived exertion (RPE) compared to maintaining target heart rate (THR) during high-intensity interval training (HIIT) exercise in hot conditions, but may also result in greater thermal strain and cardiovascular drift, as well as greater decrements in maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max). Purpose: To test the hypotheses that maintaining target RPE compared to THR during HIIT in the heat results in 1) smaller work rate adjustments, 2) greater thermal and cardiovascular strain, and 3) larger decreases in V̇O2max. Methods: Eight adults (4 women) completed a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer in 22 °C and then 4 cycling trials in 35 °C, consisting of an 8-min warm-up at 70% maximal heart rate (HRmax) or 12 RPE followed by 1 (15HR and 15RPE) or 5 (43HR and 43RPE) rounds of HIIT (1 round=4 min work at 90% HRmax or 17 RPE and 3 min recovery at 70% HRmax or 12 RPE) totaling 15 min or 43 min of exercise, respectively. Each trial ended with a GXT to measure V̇O2max. Results: In the 43-min trials work rate decreased from the first to the fifth work interval in both conditions, but by a non-significant, yet moderately larger (ES=0.53) amount during 43HR (46±29 W) compared to 43RPE (30±28 W). From the first to fifth work interval HR increased over time by 12 b∙min–1 in 43RPE (p<0.001), but did not increase during 43HR (p=0.36). Rectal temperature increases were not different between conditions (43HR=0.7 °C, p<0.001; 43RPE=0.8 °C, p<0.001). V̇O2max decreased 15.6% (ES=0.41) between 15RPE and 43RPE (p=0.005), but it was not different over time during the HR-based trials [6.5%, ES=0.16, (α adjusted for multiple comparisons=0.0125) p=0.03]. Conclusion: Maintaining target RPE and THR require considerable declines in work rate during HIIT in the heat, with ~53% larger declines needed to maintain THR. The mitigation of cardiovascular drift in the THR trial may have contributed to the preservation of V̇O2max.
Keywords: Exercise prescription, HIIT, Cardiovascular drift, power output, Heat stress, Target heart rate, rating of perceived exertion
Received: 04 Oct 2024; Accepted: 16 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yoder, Mulholland, MacDonald and Wingo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hillary A Yoder, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, 88003, New Mexico, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.