Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol.
Sec. Respiratory Physiology and Pathophysiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1481766

Within-and between-day test-retest reliability of responses to rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in healthy humans (ReStim)

Provisionally accepted
Kyle G.P.J.M. Boyle Kyle G.P.J.M. Boyle 1Andrea A. Beglinger Andrea A. Beglinger 1Heinrich Häusler Heinrich Häusler 1Anna Stahel Anna Stahel 1Esther I. Schwarz Esther I. Schwarz 2,3Christina M. Spengler Christina M. Spengler 1,4*
  • 1 Exercise Physiology Lab, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 3 Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 4 Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology (ZIHP), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, Zurich, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Mechanical ventilation can lead to lung injury and diaphragmatic dysfunction. Rapid bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (rBAMPS) may attenuate both issues by inducing diaphragm activation. However, in order for rBAMPS to become part of standard of care, the reliability of inspiratory responses to rBAMPS needs to be established. 18 healthy participants (9F) underwent five blocks of 1-s rBAMPS at 25Hz starting at 20% of maximal stimulator output with increases in 10% increments. Three blocks were completed on the same day to test within-day reliability, and two additional blocks were each completed on subsequent days to test between-day reliability. Mean transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi,mean), tidal volume (VT), discomfort, pain, and paresthesia were recorded for each rBAMPS. Relative and absolute reliability of both Pdi,mean and VT were quantified by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurements (SEM), respectively. An ordinal regression was used to determine changes of sensory ratings within and between days. At all stimulator outputs, within-day Pdi,mean displayed "good" reliability (ICC range 0.78 -0.89). Between days, Pdi,mean reliability was also "good" (ICC range 0.79 -0.87) at stimulator outputs of 20 to 50% of maximum, but "moderate" (ICC range 0.56 -0.72) at stimulator outputs of 60 to 100%. SEM for Pdi,mean within day ranged from 0.9 -3.4 across tested stimulator outputs, and increased on average by 1.4 ± 0.9 between days. VT reliability was "good" to "excellent" within (ICC range 0.82 -0.94) and between (ICC range 0.81 -0.96) days at all stimulator outputs. SEM for VT within day ranged from 0.08 -0.36 and from 0.11 -0.30 between days, and tended to be larger at stimulator outputs greater than 50% of maximum. Subsequent blocks within day was associated with decreased discomfort and pain (P £ 0.043), while subsequent days was associated with decreased discomfort and paresthesia (P < 0.001). rBAMPS appears to induce reliable diaphragmatic contractions, while select sensory responses become blunted over repeated stimulations. However, as reliability is slightly lower between days compared to within day, stimulation parameters may need to be adjusted to achieve similar responses on different days.

    Keywords: rapid magnetic stimulation, Phrenic nerve stimulation, Reliability, diaphragm contraction, Tidal Volume, Transdiaphragmatic pressure, non-invasive ventilation, diaphragm atrophy

    Received: 16 Aug 2024; Accepted: 02 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Boyle, Beglinger, Häusler, Stahel, Schwarz and Spengler. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Christina M. Spengler, Exercise Physiology Lab, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.