![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Physio-logging
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1480018
This article is part of the Research Topic Physio-logging in Humans: Recent Advances and Limitations in Wearable Devices for Biomedical Applications View all 6 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Distress detection in virtual reality systems offers a wealth of opportunities to improve user experiences, enhance therapeutic practices by catering to individual physiological and emotional states. This study evaluates the performance of two wearable devices, Empatica E4 wristband and Faros 360, in detecting distress in a motion-controlled interactive virtual reality environment. Subjects were exposed to a baseline measurement and two VR scenes, one non-interactive and one interactive, involving problem-solving and distractors. Utilizing heart rate measurements from both devices, mean heart rate, root mean square of successive differences, and subject-specific thresholds, distress intensity and frequency were explored. Both Faros and E4 sensors adequately captured physiological signals, with Faros demonstrating higher signal-to-noise ratio and consistency. While correlation coefficients were moderately positive between Faros and E4 data, indicating a linear relationship, small mean absolute error and root mean square error values suggested good agreement in measuring heart rate. Analysis of distress occurrence during the interactive scene revealed that both devices detect more high-and medium-level distress occurrences compared to the non-interactive scene. Device-specific factors in distress detection were emphasized due to differences in detected distress events between devices.
Keywords: virtual reality, User Experience, wearables, Empatica E4, Faros 360, Distress detection, Mean heart rate, RMSSD
Received: 13 Aug 2024; Accepted: 10 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Medarević, Miljković, Stojmenova Pečečnik and Sodnik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jelena Medarević, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.