Daniel Yakubovich- 1Department of Neonatology, Sanz Medical Center-Laniado Hospital, Netanya, Israel
- 2Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
Editorial on the Research Topic
Direct modulation of ion channels by G-proteins
Heterotrimeric G proteins are central mediators of intracellular signaling and are involved in control of many processes such as heart rate and blood pressure modulation, hormone secretion and release, renal function and cognitive processes. Activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by G protein-coupled 7 transmembrane spanning receptors (GPCRs) is a complex process, the subject of an intensive research that contributes to growing a list of drugs, such as β-adrenergic receptor blockers, opioids, anti-histamine drugs, dopamine receptors agonists and antagonists, etc. These drugs are utilized for the treatment of common pathologies, such as hypertension, pain, allergies, asthma, motor diseases and psychiatric conditions (Liu et al., 2024).
The list of heterotrimeric G-protein effectors is ever extending, from adenyl cyclase in the early years of G-protein research to potassium channels (GIRK – G-activated potassium channels family) (Luo et al., 2022), voltage dependent N-type Ca2+ channels (Jurkovicova-Tarabova and Lacinova, 2019), phospholipases (Ubeysinghe et al., 2023), GRK (G-protein activated receptor kinases family) (Zhang et al., 2024), KCNQ channels, beta-arrestins, etc., (Smrcka and Fisher, 2019). The current article Research Topic focuses on direct modulation of ion channels by G-proteins. Three review articles summarize research data about important G-protein effectors, in particular GIRK channels, KCNQ channels and TRP channels (Kang et al.; Nguyen et al.; Stott and Greenwood). Two additional original research articles describe the TRPC1-TRPC5 response to G proteins and modulation of stargazin (CaVγ2 subunit) expression by a cAMP dependent mechanism (Muñoz-Herrera et al.).
The mechanism of heterotrimeric G-proteins activation is still subject of intense scientific research. Since the description of the classical activation cascade involving GDP/GTP exchange (Selinger-Cassel cycle) and the subsequent dissociation of GαGTP and Gβγ, with termination of G-protein cycle accomplished by the Gα-mediated GTP hydrolysis and subunit re-association (Gilman, 1995), quite a lot of information was obtained utilizing ever extending research methods such as utilization of heterologous expression systems, Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) and single molecule monitoring techniques. Previously G-protein dissociation was assumed obligatory for interaction with effectors. At least for several signal conduction cascades rearrangement of G-protein subunits without physical separation of Gα from Gβγ is now considered (Lambert, 2008). Furthermore, the idea of multi-protein complexes comprising the GPCR, G-protein and effector, and also other modulatory molecules, is gaining support, explaining in some cases the high speed and high fidelity of signal transduction cascades which are higher than expected from diffusion-limited amplification models described previously (Doupnik, 2008). Moreover, while Gβγ was previously considered as only signal terminating subunit, nowadays quite a few effectors directly activated by an interaction with Gβγ have been described (Smrcka and Fisher, 2019). Additionally, some of the effectors are modulated directly by both branches of G-protein signaling cascade, i.e., both Gα and Gβγ, such as in the case of some phospholipases and GIRK channels).
G-protein cycle is not an isolated signal transduction pathway. A plethora of modulatory molecule such as RGS [regulator of G-protein signaling (Chidiac, 2016)], AGS [activator of G-protein signaling (Blumer and Lanier, 2014)] and even monovalent cations [such as Na+ (Friedman et al., 2020)] influence kinetics and amplitude of G-protein dependent signaling. Furthermore, GPCR-G-protein interaction was shown to be at least partially voltage dependent (Vickery et al., 2016; Tauber and Ben-Chaim, 2024). Moreover, elaboration of crystal structures of protein complexes, which incorporate G-proteins and other molecules [GPCRs, effectors, modulatory molecules (Weis and Kobilka, 2018)], sheds additional light on structure-functional correlations of G-proteins activity.
In addition to the vast amount of knowledge about normal function of G-proteins, there is a growing field of research oriented to study the involvement of G-proteins in disease. In particular, various mutations in G-protein molecules have been shown to influence endocrine function [McCune-Albright syndrome (Nicolaides et al., 2023)], epilepsy and neuro-development [GNB1 encephalopathy (Nasvytis et al., 2024)]. Furthermore, substantial contribution was shown for GIRK channels in the development of addictions and pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation (Mitrokhin et al., 2024).
To summarize, G-protein research is an extending field of enquiry of constantly growing physiological and pharmacological importance. Four scientists (Alfred G. Gilman, Martin Rodbell, Brian Kobilka, and Robert Lefkowitz) received Noble Prize for substantial contribution to our knowledge in this field and there is still a lot to continue the research in it.
Author contributions
DY: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Blumer J. B., Lanier S. M. (2014). Activators of G protein signaling exhibit broad functionality and define a distinct core signaling triad. Mol. Pharmacol. 85, 388–396. doi:10.1124/mol.113.090068
Chidiac P. (2016). RGS proteins destroy spare receptors: eeffects of GPCR-interacting proteins and signal deamplification on measurements of GPCR agonist potency. Methods 92, 87–93. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.08.011
Doupnik C. A. (2008). GPCR-Kir channel signaling complexes: defining rules of engagement. J. Recept Signal Transduct. Res. 28, 83–91. doi:10.1080/10799890801941970
Friedman S., Tauber M., Ben-Chaim Y. (2020). Sodium ions allosterically modulate the M2 muscarinic receptor. Sci. Rep. 10, 11177. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68133-9
Gilman A. G. (1995). Nobel Lecture. G proteins and regulation of adenylyl cyclase. Biosci. Rep. 15, 65–97. doi:10.1007/BF01200143
Jurkovicova-Tarabova B., Lacinova L. (2019). Structure, function and regulation of CaV 2.2 N-type calcium channels. Physiol. Biophys. 38, 101–110. doi:10.4149/gpb_2019004
Lambert N. A. (2008). Dissociation of heterotrimeric g proteins in cells. Sci. Signal 1, re5. doi:10.1126/scisignal.125re5
Liu S., Anderson P. J., Rajagopal S., Lefkowitz R. J., Rockman H. A. (2024). G protein-coupled receptors: a century of research and discovery. Circ. Res. 135, 174–197. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.323067
Luo H., Marron Fernandez de Velasco E., Wickman K. (2022). Neuronal G protein-gated K(+) channels. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 323, C439–c460. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00102.2022
Mitrokhin V., Hadzi-Petrushev N., Kazanski V., Schileyko S., Kamkina O., Rodina A., et al. (2024). The Role of K(ACh) channels in atrial fibrillation. Cells. 13, 1014. doi:10.3390/cells13121014
Nasvytis M., Čiauškaitė J., Jurkevičienė G. (2024). GNB1 encephalopathy: clinical case report and literature review. Medicina. 60, 589. doi:10.3390/medicina60040589
Nicolaides N. C., Kontou M., Vasilakis I. A., Binou M., Lykopoulou E., Kanaka-Gantenbein C. (2023). McCune-Albright syndrome: a case report and review of literature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 8464. doi:10.3390/ijms24108464
Smrcka A. V., Fisher I. (2019). G-protein βγ subunits as multi-functional scaffolds and transducers in G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Mol. Life Sci. 76, 4447–4459. doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03275-2
Tauber M., Ben-Chaim Y. (2024). Voltage sensors embedded in G protein-coupled receptors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 5295. doi:10.3390/ijms25105295
Ubeysinghe S., Wijayaratna D., Kankanamge D., Karunarathne A. (2023). Molecular regulation of PLCβ signaling. Methods Enzymol. 682, 17–52. doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2023.01.001
Vickery O. N., Machtens J. P., Zachariae U. (2016). Membrane potentials regulating GPCRs: insights from experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 30, 44–50. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2016.06.011
Weis W. I., Kobilka B. K. (2018). The molecular basis of G protein-coupled receptor activation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 87, 897–919. doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033910
Keywords: ion channel, G-protein, signal transduction, receptor, effector
Citation: Yakubovich D (2024) Editorial: Direct modulation of ion channels by G-proteins. Front. Physiol. 15:1465766. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1465766
Received: 16 July 2024; Accepted: 29 July 2024;
Published: 09 August 2024.
Edited and reviewed by:
Christoph Fahlke, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HZ), GermanyCopyright © 2024 Yakubovich. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Daniel Yakubovich, ZGFuaWFsQHRhdWV4LnRhdS5hYy5pbA==