Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal Sciences
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1462018

Malva sylvestris leaf powder as feed additive affects the performance, carcass traits, meat quality attributes, serum antioxidants, stress physiology, intestinal bacterial counts and gut morphology of broiler chicken

Provisionally accepted
Mohammad T. Banday Mohammad T. Banday 1Manzoor Wani Manzoor Wani 1Haifa A. Alqhtani Haifa A. Alqhtani 2May Bin-Jumah May Bin-Jumah 2Hassan A. Rudayni Hassan A. Rudayni 3Ahmed A. Allam Ahmed A. Allam 3Uthman B. Algopishi Uthman B. Algopishi 4Sheikh Adil Sheikh Adil 1*
  • 1 Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Srinagar, India
  • 2 Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 3 Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 4 King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study investigated the effect of supplementation of Malva sylvestris leaf powder (MSLP) on production performance of broiler chicken. 240 day-old male VenCobb broiler chicks were distributed randomly into 4 treatments, each replicated 4 times, with 15 birds per replicate. The diets formulated were T1 (Control) given basal diet only, T2 (basal diet +1.0 % MSLP), T3 (basal diet +1.5 % MSLP), and T4 (basal diet +2.0 % MSLP). Highest improvement of 3.83% in the average daily gain (ADG) was recorded in T3 group fed 1.5% Malva powder in the diet when compared to control (P = 0.009). Average daily feed intake (ADFI) tended to decrease with increase in the dose of MSLP in diet, with lowest feed intake in T4 group fed 2 % MSLP in the diet. During the overall period (7-42 d), Feed/gain (F/G) ratio reduced significantly (P = 0.048) in T3 and T4 groups in comparison to control. The dressed and breast meat yield was found significantly (P < 0.05) higher in T3 group with no significance (P > 0.05) in thigh yield. pH and water holding capacity (WHC) of breast meat were found nonsignificant (P > 0.05) between control and various other treatments. Thiobarbituric acidreactive substances (TBARS) significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in T3 and T4. There was no negative effect on the colour coordinates of breast meat among different treatments by inclusion of MSLP in the diet. In comparison to control, serum IgM values increased significantly (P < 0.05) in T3 and T4 groups. SOD showed no difference between various treatments, however, MDA decreased significantly (P < 0.05) in dietary treatments. Serum cortisol increased significantly (P < 0.05) in T4 group when compared to other treatments.Inclusion of Malva powder at 2% level in the diet significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the coliform count when compared to the control birds. Supplemented with Malva powder resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) increase in villus height to crypt depth (VH:CD) ratio of broiler birds in T3 and T4 groups. In conclusion, MSLP supplementation at 1.5 % and 2% resulted in improved production performance of broiler chicken.

    Keywords: Malva, Phytogenic, feed additive, broiler chicken, performance

    Received: 09 Jul 2024; Accepted: 29 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Banday, Wani, Alqhtani, Bin-Jumah, Rudayni, Allam, Algopishi and Adil. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Sheikh Adil, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Srinagar, India

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.