Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol.
Sec. Environmental, Aviation and Space Physiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1435448

The Effect of 60 Days of 6° Head-Down-Tilt Bed Rest on Circulating Adropin, Irisin, Retinol Binding Protein-4 (RBP4) and Individual Metabolic Responses in Young, Healthy Males

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Faculty of Science and Health, Athlone Institute of Technology, Athlone, Ireland
  • 2 Department of Muscle and Bone Metabolism, Institute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • 3 School of Health & Human Performance, Faculty of Science & Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
  • 4 National Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin, County Dublin, Ireland
  • 5 EduFIT, Laois, Ireland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Alterations in the circulating concentrations and target-tissue action of organokines underpin the development of insulin resistance in microgravity and gravity deprivation. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in circulating adropin, irisin, retinol binding protein-4 (RBP4), and the metabolic response of healthy young males following 60 days of 6° head-down-tilt (HDT) bed rest, with and without reactive jump training (RJT), to explore links with whole-body and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity. To our knowledge, this is the first time that adropin, irisin, and RBP4 have been studied in HDT bed rest.Methods: A total of 23 male subjects (29 ± 6 years, 181 ± 6 cm, 77 ± 7 kg) were exposed to 60 days of 6° HDT bed rest and randomized to a control (CTRL, n = 11) or a RJT (JUMP, n = 12) group (48 sessions with ≤ 4 minutes total training time per session). Circulating adropin, irisin, and RBP4 were quantified in fasting serum before and after HDT bed rest. A subanalysis was performed a posteriori to investigate individual metabolic responses post-HDT bed rest based on subjects that showed an increase or decrease in whole-body insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index).Results: There were significant main effects of time, but not group, for decreases in adropin, irisin, Matsuda index, and liver insulin sensitivity following HDT bed rest (p < 0.05), whereas RBP4 did not change. The subanalysis identified that in a subgroup with decreased whole-body insulin sensitivity (n = 17), RBP4 increased significantly, whereas adropin, irisin, and liver insulin sensitivity were all decreased significantly following HDT bed rest. Conversely, in a subgroup with increased whole-body insulin sensitivity (n = 6), liver insulin sensitivity increased significantly after HDT bed rest, whereas adropin, irisin, and RBP4 did not change.Investigating individual metabolic responses has provided insights into changes in circulating adropin, irisin, RBP4, in relation to insulin sensitivity following HDT bed rest. We conclude that adropin, irisin, and RBP4 are candidate biomarkers for providing insights into whole-body and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity to track changes in physiological responsiveness to a gravity deprivation intervention in a lean male cohort.

    Keywords: Adropin, irisin, RBP4, Liver, bed rest Biomarkers and Individual Metabolic Responses

    Received: 20 May 2024; Accepted: 26 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ward, Mulder, Frings-Meuthen, O'Gorman and Cooper. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Diane Cooper, EduFIT, Laois, Ireland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.