This article is a correction to:
Crossover point and maximal fat oxidation training effects on blood lipid metabolism in young overweight women: a pilot study
Dizhi Wang1,2†
Peizhen Zhang
Jin Li- 1School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
- 2Division of Sports Science and Physical Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
A Corrigendum on
Crossover point and maximal fat oxidation training effects on blood lipid metabolism in young overweight women: a pilot study
by Wang D, Zhang P and Li J (2023). Front. Physiol. 14:1190109. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1190109
In the published article, some numbers were transcribed incorrectly.
1 A correction has been made to Abstract, Results. These sentences previously stated: “They also had significantly decreased hip circumference (4.8 ± 3.3 cm), serum apolipoprotein B (ApoB) levels (15.48 ± 14.19 mg/dL), and ApoB/apolipoprotein AI (ApoAI) ratios (0.47 ± 0.37) (p < 0.01). However, their serum ApoAI levels were significantly increased (14.18 ± 10.24 mg/dL; p < 0.01). Participants in the FATmax group had significantly decreased hip circumference (2.4 ± 2.0 cm), serum ApoB levels (14.49 ± 11.00 mg/dL), and ApoB/ApoAI ratios (0.59 ± 0.30) (p < 0.01) but significantly increased serum ApoAI levels (29.53 ± 13.29 mg/dL; p < 0.01).” The corrected sentences appear below:
“They also had significantly decreased hip circumference (4.8 ± 3.3 cm), serum apolipoprotein B (ApoB) levels (15.48 ± 14.19 mg/dL), and ApoB/apolipoprotein AI (ApoAI) ratios (0.23 ± 0.17) (p < 0.01). However, their serum ApoAI levels were significantly increased (14.18 ± 10.24 mg/dL; p < 0.01). Participants in the FATmax group had significantly decreased hip circumference (2.4 ± 2.0 cm), serum ApoB levels (14.49 ± 11.00 mg/ dL), and ApoB/ApoAI ratios (0.35 ± 0.15) (p < 0.01) but significantly increased serum ApoAI levels (29.53 ± 13.29 mg/dL; p < 0.01).”
2 A correction has been made to 3 Result, 3.2 Effect of different training on morphological indices, Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated: “Moreover, BMI was significantly reduced (0.91 ± 1.26 kg/m2; 3.44%) in the COP group (t(12) = 2.94, p = 0.012, 95% CI: 0.26, 1.74; d = 0.816, p < 0.05).” The corrected sentence appears below:
“Moreover, BMI was significantly reduced (0.91 ± 1.26 kg/m2; 3.48%) in the COP group [(t(12) = 2.94, p = 0.012, 95% CI: 0.26, 1.74; d = 0.816, p < 0.05)].”
3 A correction has been made to 3 Results, 3.3 Effect of different training on body composition, Paragraph 1. These sentences previously stated: “The body fat percentage was significantly reduced (1.21% ± 1.50%; 4.93%) in the COP group (t(12) = 2.79, p = 0.018, 95% CI: 0.25, 2.16; d = 0.804, p < 0.05). In addition, fat mass was significantly reduced (1.90 ± 2.30 kg; 9.75%) in the COP group [(t(12) = 2.87, p = 0.015, 95% CI: 0.44, 3.36; d = 0.827, p < 0.05)].” The corrected sentences appear below:
“The body fat percentage was significantly reduced (1.21% ± 1.50%; 3.12%) in the COP group [(t(12) = 2.79, p = 0.018, 95% CI: 0.25, 2.16; d = 0.804, p < 0.05)]. In addition, fat mass was significantly reduced (1.90 ± 2.30 kg; 6.94%) in the COP group [(t(12) = 2.87, p = 0.015, 95% CI: 0.44, 3.36; d = 0.827, p < 0.05).”
4 A correction has been made to 3 Result, 3.4 Effect of different training on blood indices, Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated: “Moreover, ApoB/ApoAI ratios were significantly reduced (0.47 ± 0.37; 39.17%) in the COP group [(t(12) = 5.05, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.34; d = 1.401, p < 0.01)].” The corrected sentence appears below:
“Moreover, ApoB/ApoAI ratios were significantly reduced (0.23 ± 0.17; 25.84%) in the COP group [(t(12) = 5.05, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.34; d = 1.401, p < 0.01)].”
5 A correction has been made to 3 Result, 3.4 Effect of different training on blood indices, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated: “Moreover, ApoB/ApoAI ratios were significantly reduced (0.59 ± 0.30; 56.73%) in the FATmax group [(t(8) = 7.19, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.47; d = 2.397, p < 0.01)].” The corrected sentence appears below:
“Moreover, ApoB/ApoAI ratios were significantly reduced (0.35 ± 0.15; 34.65%) in the FATmax group [(t(8) = 7.19, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.47; d = 2.397, p < 0.01)].”
6: A correction has been made to 4 Discussion, Paragraph 3. This sentence previously stated: “In this study, weight and BMI were significantly reduced in the COP group (3.71% and 3.44%, respectively; ES: 0.815 and 0.816; p < 0.05), while the weight and BMI were unchanged in the FATmax and control groups.” The corrected sentence appears below:
“In this study, weight and BMI were significantly reduced in the COP group (3.71% and 3.48%, respectively; ES: 0.815 and 0.816; p < 0.05), while the weight and BMI were unchanged in the FATmax and control groups.”
7 A correction has been made to 4 Discussion, Paragraph 5. This sentence previously stated: “In this study, the body fat percentage and fat mass of participants in the COP group were significantly reduced (4.93% and 9.75%, respectively; ES: 0.804 and 0.827; p < 0.05).” The corrected sentence appears below:
“In this study, the body fat percentage and fat mass of participants in the COP group were significantly reduced (3.12% and 6.94%, respectively; ES: 0.804 and 0.827; p < 0.05).”
8 A correction has been made to 4 Discussion, Paragraph 12. This sentence previously stated: “Similarly, ApoB/ApoAI ratios decreased significantly in our COP (39.17%, ES = 1.401, p < 0.01) and FATmax (56.73%; ES = 2.397, p < 0.01) groups, but remained unchanged in our control group.” The corrected sentence appears below:
“Similarly, ApoB/ApoAI ratios decreased significantly in our COP (25.84%, ES = 1.401, p < 0.01) and FATmax (34.65%; ES = 2.397, p < 0.01) groups, but remained unchanged in our control group.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: crossover point intensity, maximal fat oxidation intensity, lipid metabolism, overweight, cardiovascular health
Citation: Wang D, Zhang P and Li J (2024) Corrigendum: Crossover point and maximal fat oxidation training effects on blood lipid metabolism in young overweight women: a pilot study. Front. Physiol. 15:1426727. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1426727
Received: 02 May 2024; Accepted: 17 July 2024;
Published: 30 July 2024.
Edited and reviewed by:
Giuseppe D’Antona, University of Pavia, ItalyCopyright © 2024 Wang, Zhang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peizhen Zhang, zhpzh@bsu.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship