AUTHOR=Kopiczko Anna , Czapla Michał , Kubielas Grzegorz , Uchmanowicz Bartosz 

TITLE=Determinants of bone mineral density in various regions of the skeleton among smokers and non-smokers: the role of physical activity

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Physiology

VOLUME=15

YEAR=2024

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2024.1403102

DOI=10.3389/fphys.2024.1403102

ISSN=1664-042X

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Background</title><p>The adult human skeleton is composed of cortical and cancellous bone. The proportions of these two types of bone tissue differ in various parts of the skeleton. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to quantify the determinants of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content in various regions of interest (ROIs) in smokers and never-smokers.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>In this study, 4,332 bone scans of three regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed: the forearm (distal and proximal), femur, and lumbar spine. Body composition and bone parameters were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Smoking was measured using the Global Adult Tobacco Survey questionnaire. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated, and physical activity (PA) was characterized by the metabolic equivalent of task (MET).</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Among women, the interaction between PA (positive β coefficient) and smoking (negative β coefficient) was a significant predictor of BMD in the distal and proximal forearm (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.40 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.58; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). The interaction of three variables—age, smoking (negative β), and MET (positive β)—was significant for total hip BMD (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.54; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). The interaction between BMI and MET (positive β) and smoking (negative β) was significant for BMD in the lumbar spine (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.62; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). In men, the interaction between MET (positive β) and smoking (negative β) was significant for BMD in the forearm and lumbar spine (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.44, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.46, and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.49; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01). Smoking alone was a significant negative predictor of total hip BMD (adj. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.34; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Among both women and men, never-smokers had significantly better bone parameters than smokers. Smoking was a significant negative predictor for BMD in the various ROIs in both women and men. Physical activity was a significant positive predictor of BMD, with a strong association with bone parameters.</p></sec>