The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Skeletal Physiology
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1403102
Determinants of Bone Mineral Density in Various Regions of the Skeleton Among Smokers and Non-Smokers: The Role of Physical Activity
Provisionally accepted- 1 Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland
- 2 Department of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- 3 Group of Research in Care (GRUPAC), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
- 4 Institute of Heart Diseases, University Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland
- 5 Department of Nursing and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
The adult human skeleton is composed of cortical and cancellous bone. The proportions of these two types of bone tissue differ in various parts of the skeleton. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to quantify the determinants of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mass content in various regions of interest (ROIs) in smokers and never-smokers.In this study, 4332 bone scans divided from 3 regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed: the forearm (distal and proximal), femur and lumbar spine. Body composition and bone parameters were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Smoking was measured by the Global Adult Tobacco Survey questionnaire. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and physical activity (PA) was characterized by metabolic equivalent of task (MET).Results Among women, the interaction between PA (positive β coefficient) and smoking (negative β coefficient) was a significant predictor of BMD in the distal and proximal forearm (adj. R²=0.40 and R²=0.58; p<0.001). The interaction of three variablesage, smoking (negative β), and MET (positive β) -was significant for total hip BMD (adj. R²=0.54; p<0.001).The interaction between BMI and MET (positive β) and smoking (negative β) was significant for BMD in the lumbar spine (adj. R²=0.62; p<0.001). In men, the interaction between MET (positive β) and smoking (negative β) was significant for BMD in the forearm and lumbar spine (adj. R²=0.44, R²=0.46, R²=0.49; p<0.01). Smoking alone was a significant negative predictor of total hip BMD (adj. R²=0.34; p<0.001).Among both women and men, never-smokers had significantly better bone parameters compared to smokers. Smoking was a significant negative predictor for BMD in the various ROIs in both women and men. Physical activity was a significant positive predictor of BMD, with a strong association with bone parameters.
Keywords: bone mineral density, various regions of skeleton, Caucasian ethnic group, Smoking, physical activity
Received: 18 Mar 2024; Accepted: 29 Aug 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Kopiczko, Czapla, Kubielas and Uchmanowicz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Michał Czapla, Department of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.