Higher rating of perceived exertion and lower perceived recovery following a graded exercise test during menses compared to non-bleeding days in untrained females

The underrepresentation of the female population in exercise sciences could be attributed, at least in part, to difficulty in appropriately accounting for the effects of the menstrual cycle (MC). Previous studies examining the effects of the MC on aerobic performance and subjective measures of aerobic performance show conflicting results.

Purpose: The study examined how the MC affects the objective and subjective measures of aerobic performance within untrained female participants and in comparison with untrained male participants assessed at similar time intervals.

Methods: Twenty-one participants (12 females and 9 males) completed a graded exercise test (GXT) on a cycle ergometer. The female participants were tested during their early follicular (EF; menses), ovulatory (O), and mid-luteal (ML) phases of the MC. The male participants were included as the control group and were randomly assigned to a menstrual cycle phase for each visit. During GXT, maximal oxygen consumption (VO_2max), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), maximal heart rate (HR_max), peak blood lactate, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were determined. Twenty-four hours post-exercise, the perceived recovery status (PRS) was assessed. The MC phase was estimated using basal body temperature (BBT) in the female participants.

Results: The male participants obtained a higher peak power and VO_2max compared to the female participants (p < 0.05). All objective measures of aerobic performance did not significantly differ across the MC phases or time points that were tested. In the untrained female participants, an effect of the MC phase on RPE was found, with RPE being higher at EF (8.92 ± 0.79) compared to O (7.67 ± 1.23; p < 0.05) and ML (7.75 ± 1.06; p < 0.05). In addition, an effect of the MC phase on PRS was found, with perceived recovery being lower at EF (6.83 ± 0.94) compared to O (8.83 ± 1.12) and ML (8.67 ± 0.65; all p < 0.005) for the untrained female participants. No significant differences in RPE and PRS were found between tests in the untrained male participants. The female participants had lower perceived recovery following EF (6.83 ± 0.94) compared with the male participants (9.00 ± 1.00; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The untrained female participants perceived greater exertion during GXT and impaired recovery following GXT in EF compared to O and ML. These results may be attributed to either a drop in female sex hormone concentrations or discomfort associated with menses. The male participants did not exhibit any changes over time. Future studies using subjective parameters such as perceived exertion to track the internal load of training in the naturally menstruating female population should consider menses.

1 Introduction

In exercise sciences, sex is a biological variable that researchers often control to reduce group variability. Inadvertently, however, this has led to the female population being largely underrepresented in exercise physiology research (Oosthuyse and Bosch, 2010). The average participation of the female population in exercise science articles was estimated to be in the range of 35%–37% (Costello et al., 2014). The underrepresentation of the female population in exercise science research could be attributed, at least in part, to difficulty in appropriately accounting for the effects of the menstrual cycle. In the last few decades, the prevalence of the female population in athletic activities and recreational exercise has increased (Acosta and Carpenter, 1977; Smith and Wrynn, 2013), motivating researchers to advance their current understandings of how the menstrual cycle (MC) and the changes in estrogen and progesterone potentially impact physiological and perceptual responses to exercise (Jurkowski et al., 1981; Hackney et al., 1991; Cook et al., 1998; Constantini et al., 2005).

Maximal oxygen consumption (VO_2max) is an indicator of cardiorespiratory fitness and is a predictor of all-cause and disease-specific mortality (Harber et al., 2017). Research on the effect of the MC on VO_2max has shown conflicting results. A previous study with physically active participants found that VO_2max was affected by the menstrual cycle (Gordon et al., 2018). Using an incremental stress test on a cycle ergometer, the study found that there was a difference in VO_2max (mL/kg/min) between the menses phase (days 1–3; 41.6 ± 3.7), mid-follicular phase (days 9–11; 44.1 ± 3.9 v. 44), and pre-menstrual phase (days 27–28; 43.2 ± 3.6) (Gordon et al., 2018). In contrast, other studies have observed that VO_2max assessed using an incremental stress test is not affected by the MC phase in female participants (Dombovy et al., 1987; Bemben et al., 1995; Smekal et al., 2007; Taipale-Mikkonen et al., 2021). The participants of the studies were reported as moderately active to trained (Bemben et al., 1995; Smekal et al., 2007), while one study had untrained participants (Dombovy et al., 1987).

However, several of these studies did not report perceptual variables such as rating of perceived exertion (RPE) or perceived recovery status (PRS) (Bemben et al., 1995; Smekal et al., 2007; Gordon et al., 2018). In moderately active or trained female participants, the MC did not affect perceived exertion measured during exercise and perceived exertion at maximal effort (Nicklas et al., 1989; De Souza et al., 1990; Bailey et al., 2000; Lara et al., 2020; Pereira et al., 2020). In contrast, the influence of the MC on perceived exertion shows conflicting results in untrained individuals (Dombovy et al., 1987; Nicklas et al., 1989; Pivarnik et al., 1992; Galliven et al., 1997; Caldwell Hooper et al., 2011). These studies employed a variety of methods for determining the MC phase, including blood samples (Nicklas et al., 1989; Pivarnik et al., 1992) or based on their menstrual history or calendar(Dombovy et al., 1987; Caldwell Hooper et al., 2011), and a variety of exercise intensities, including submaximal (Nicklas et al., 1989; Pivarnik et al., 1992; Caldwell Hooper et al., 2011) and maximal (Dombovy et al., 1987). Two studies found no change in RPE across the phases (Dombovy et al., 1987; Nicklas et al., 1989), while the other two studies found that RPE was affected by the MC phase (Pivarnik et al., 1992; Caldwell Hooper et al., 2011). One study found that RPE was higher during the luteal phase than the follicular phase during a 60-min bout of sustained cycling (Pivarnik et al., 1992). Another study found that RPE was higher during the early follicular phase than the late follicular and luteal phases during sustained cycling (Caldwell Hooper et al., 2011). The differences found in the studies could be due to methodological differences in how the menstrual cycle phases were determined and whether subtle disturbances (small hormone fluctuations, inadequate levels of hormones, etc.) in the menstrual cycle may have affected the perception of performance (Janse De Jonge et al., 2019). In addition, the influence of the training status on the menstrual cycle may have affected the performance and perceived performance of the participants (Janse De Jonge et al., 2019). The differences between the findings in trained and untrained individuals could simply be due to the training status, given that sedentary individuals and individuals with low fitness levels have been shown to have heightened RPE at a given heart rate (HR) compared to trained individuals (Demello et al., 1987; Travlos and Marisi, 1996; Chen et al., 2002).

The inconsistent findings of the effects of the MC on the perception of effort are potentially supported by the interaction of gonadal hormones with nociception in the peripheral and central nervous system (Fillingim and Ness, 2000). Estrogen and progesterone have been suggested to influence the magnitude of pain perception which is a key determinant of perceived exertion and recovery (Craft et al., 2004; Martin, 2009). Pain perception is likely integrated into RPE, and a correlation between heightened pain and heightened RPE during exercise has been observed (Black and Dobson, 2013). In addition, there are conflicting observations in the reported subjective measures of pain sensitivity across the menstrual cycle in female participants—with some finding these values to be the lowest during the early follicular phase, ovulation, or pre-menstrual phase (Iacovides et al., 2015). Meanwhile, several other studies have reported no significant changes in pain sensitivity across the menstrual cycle (Choi et al., 2006; Teepker et al., 2010; Iacovides et al., 2015).

Understanding how perceived exertion during exercise and perceived recovery following exercise are affected by the menstrual cycle could have implications for training. It has been suggested that knowing how people perceive their efforts may be as important as knowing how much effort they are exerting (Rejeski, 1981). RPE allows for the assessment of an individual’s perception of effort during performance. In addition, RPE can be used as a method for assessing training load when training and has been shown to be an accurate method compared to HR-based methods (Borresen and Lambert, 2008). The differences in how exercise is perceived at different points during the menstrual cycle may have an impact on how trainers or individuals approach training loads.

Improving the prescription of exercise in training programs for untrained, naturally menstruating female participants depends on an adequate understanding of any potential influence of the MC phase on both objective and subjective measures of aerobic performance. This may have implications for how personal trainers or other exercise professionals approach training with currently untrained female participants who are not using hormonal contraceptives. If VO_2max varies during the menstrual cycle, then scheduling exercise testing could be affected. In addition, if the perception of effort varies across the MC, then this would affect how trainers approach prescribing training loads and/or how they might motivate their clients. The purpose of this study was to examine how the MC affects the subjective and objective variables of aerobic performance within the female participants and in comparison with the male participants at similar time intervals.

2 Methods and materials

2.1 Participants

This study includes results from 21 participants, comprising 9 males (age: 21.6 years ±1.7, height: 177.4 cm ± 2.8, and weight: 82.9 kg ± 4.8) and 12 females (age: 21.3 years ±1.1, height: 167.9 cm ± 1.7, and weight: 71.0 kg ± 4.6). The male participants were treated as the control group in this experiment due to the absence of fluctuations in the levels of progesterone and estradiol (Barbieri, 2014). An a priori sample size calculation indicated a minimum of 20 individuals for a two-group (males vs. females), three-timepoint (menstrual cycle phases) study to indicate differences using a within–between repeated measures ANOVA with an α value of 0.05, effect size of 0.30, and power of 0.80 (Lebrun et al., 1995; Gordon et al., 2018). Additionally, in this study, male and female participants were required to be free from external hormonal influences (hormonal contraceptives, antidepressants, or other medications) and were required to maintain the current physical activity levels for the duration of the study. The female participants were required to have a regular menstrual cycle while not using oral hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, implants, injections, or any other hormonal birth control methods for at least 1 year. All female participants reported a regular cycle lasting ≥21 days and ≤35 days (cycle length: 29.33 days ±3.30) and a luteal phase of ≥10 days based on ovulation detected using basal body temperature (BBT) measurements. Participants were free from metabolic, respiratory, neurological, and cardiovascular diseases, and free from any debilitating musculoskeletal injury (within 1 year). In addition, none of the participants were engaged in a regular training regimen, which was defined as not meeting ACSM recommendations for physical activity. All participants provided written informed consent before participating in the study. This study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2 Design

This study utilized a repeated measures design, across three timepoints—during menses (day 0–3), which was considered the early follicular phase (EF), the ovulation phase (O), and the mid-luteal phase (ML; between 7 and 9 days following the spike in BBT)—with similar time intervals between visits for the male participants. The participants completed a Profile of Mood States (POMS) at all three visits. In addition, the female participants received a menstrual cycle history questionnaire. The first visit included a familiarization with the GXT protocol and equipment. Following the familiarization trial, visits were scheduled to control for the time of day (within a 2-h start range). The participants were instructed to refrain from vigorous exercise for 48 h and fast 3 h prior to data collection and were also advised not to consume any caffeine within 6 h prior to testing.

2.3 Menstrual cycle tracking

The female participants were scheduled for visits during menses as an indication of an early follicular phase (EF; within the first 3 days of menstruation, day 0–3), ovulatory (O; within 24 h of a spike in BBT ≥ 0.3°C), and mid-luteal (ML; 7–9 days following the spike in BBT) phases. BBT was tracked in all participants using a digital thermometer (iProvèn Model BBT-113Ai, Beaverton, OR, USA). BBT was measured immediately after waking to ensure the most accurate reading. Participants were required to track and report BBT each morning for 4 weeks before and throughout the study. This established a baseline of BBT values for each individual and aided in the confirmation of ovulation (McClure Brown, 1973). Further visits were scheduled according to which phase occurred first following the familiarization visit. This ensured that the visit order was randomized across female participants, which served to minimize the influence of the learning effect on the test results. For the female participants, four participants had their first visit during EF, two participants had their first visit during O, and six participants had their first visit during L. The time between visits varied between subjects due to differences in female participants’ cycle and availability (Barbieri, 2014). Visit dates for male subjects were randomly assigned to correspond to the time between visits for the average female 28-day cycle. For example, if a male participant was assigned a visit equivalent to EF first, his visit equivalent to O occurred approximately 14 days after, and his visit equivalent to ML was approximately 7–9 days later. The male participants were randomly assigned to visit on analogous days according to a predicted 28-day cycle. For the male participants, three had their first visit scheduled as “EF,” four had their first visit scheduled as “O,” and two participants started testing in “ML.”

2.4 Graded exercise test protocol

The GXT protocol was performed on a cycle ergometer (Lode Excalibur Sport, The Netherlands). Participants were fitted with a Polar heart rate sensor (Polar Inc. Model H1, Bethpage, NY, USA) to track the heart rate. Before GXT, participants performed a 5-min warm-up at a self-selected intensity. GXT consisted of a ramp protocol starting at 0.5 W/kg of body weight and increasing by 0.5 W/kg every 60 s (Larson et al., 2015). The participants were required to maintain a self-selected cycling cadence; if the cadence declined more than 10 rpm, then the test was terminated. Following the cessation of the test, the participants performed a cooldown at 25 W until their heart rate dropped below 130 bpm.

Expired gases were collected and analyzed using a metabolic cart (ParvoMedics TrueOne 2400, Sandy, UT, USA). VO_2max was recorded breath-by-breath continuously during the exercise test using a 30-s average. During GXT, RPE and lactate were measured at the end of each minute of exercise. At the end of the test, the last stage HR (HR_max) respiratory exchange ratio (RER), and peak power (power achieved during the last stage) were recorded.

2.5 VO_2max verification

To ensure a true maximal value for oxygen consumption, the participants rested for 20 min before performing a verification test on the cycle ergometer. The load of the verification test was set at the peak power of the previously administered GXT. The verification test began with a 10-s warm-up at 0.5 W per kilogram of the participant’s body weight and increased every 5 s, ensuring that the participants reached the max load within 30 s of cycling. If the participant maintained a cadence of at least 40 rpm for the majority of the 5 min, or if the participant’s VO₂ value exceeded the previous measure (±3%) (Nolan et al., 2014), then the participant’s previous maximal graded exercise test was deemed invalid. If these criteria were not met and the participant stopped cycling or cycled at a cadence <40 rpm within 5 min, then the original maximal test was considered valid, and all measured parameters were recorded. All of the participants met the criteria for a valid test. Cooldown was set at 25 W, and subjects were free to dismount the bike when their HR measured ≤130 bpm and they felt comfortable walking and exiting the laboratory safely.

2.6 Blood lactate

The blood lactate level was assessed by performing a finger stick drawing of ∼1.0 μL blood; samples were analyzed using a portable lactate analyzer (Lactate Plus, Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA). Blood lactate was collected before and immediately after the GXT.

2.7 Rating of perceived exertion

The participants rated their exertion based on a modified Borg scale ranging from 0 (no exertion at all) to 10 (maximal exertion) (Borg, 1982). They were instructed to point to the number corresponding to their overall RPE.

2.8 Perceived recovery status

Twenty-four hours after each visit, the participants were asked to complete a perceived recovery status (PRS) scale, which ranged from 0 (very poorly recovered and extremely tired) to 10 (very well recovered and highly energetic) (Laurent et al., 2011).

2.9 Profile of Mood States

A shortened version of the POMS questionnaire was used for the study (Shacham, 1983). The questionnaire consists of a series of descriptions that describe the feelings that the participants may have. The participants self-reported on each of these areas for how they were feeling on the day of each test. The scoring ranged from 0 to 4, with 0 being “not at all” and 4 being “extremely.” The categories of interest were dealing with feelings of fatigue and vigor on the day of each test. POMS was used as a way to examine if there were changes in moods over the menstrual cycle for the female participants and over time in the male participants.

2.10 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis for this study was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A two-group (female and male) by two-condition (GXT and verification) by three-timepoint (MC phase/time point) repeated measures ANOVA was used to examine differences in VO_2max. A two-group (female and male) by three-timepoint (MC phase/time point) repeated measures ANOVA was performed for the objective (HR_max, RER, and blood lactate) and subjective measures (overall RPE, local RPE, and PRS). Pairwise comparisons were performed using a Bonferroni correction. The effect size for each variable was calculated using partial eta-squared (η_p²), in which small effect = 0.01–0.05, medium effect = 0.06–0.13, and a large effect size ≥ 0.14 (Cohen, 1988).

Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and their 95% confidence intervals for the objective parameters (VO_2max, RER, HR_max, and lactate) were calculated based on a mean-rating (k = 3), absolute agreement, two-way mixed effects model (Koo and Li, 2016). ICCs were interpreted as follows: values less than 0.50 indicated poor reliability, values between 0.50 and 0.75 indicated moderate reliability, values between 0.75 and 0.90 indicated good reliability, and values greater than 0.90 indicated excellent reliability (Koo and Li, 2016).

3 Results

3.1 Objective measures

There were no observed main effects of the MC phase for the female participants or main effects of time for the male participants on the objective measures (VO_2max, RER, HR_max, or peak blood lactate) (Table 1). In addition, there were no interactions between MC phase/time and sex for any of the objective measures (Table 1). There were no observed differences within sex for VO_2max recorded from GXT and verification protocols (Table 1). There was an effect of sex on VO_2max (F_1,19 = 318.896, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.944) and peak power (F_1,19 = 548.377, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.967), where the male participants had a higher VO_2max (mean difference: 9.44 mL kg^-1 ∙ min^-1; p = 0.026, ηp² = 0.236) and higher peak power (mean difference: 86.96 W; p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.472) than the female participants (Table 1). The objective measures were observed to have moderate to excellent test–retest reliability (Table 2).

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Aerobic parameters.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Test–retest reliability.

3.2 Subjective measures

There were no main effects or interactions for any of the POMS categories for either sex. There was a phase-by-sex interaction for overall RPE (F_2,38 = 3.543, p = 0.039, ηp² = 0.157). Overall RPE was higher at EF (8.92 ± 0.79; ηp² = 0.416) than O (7.67 ± 1.23; p = 0.008) and ML (7.75 ± 1.06; p = 0.013) for the female participants (Figure 1). A medium effect of sex at each timepoint (EF: 0.09, O: 0.09, and L: 0.08) was observed, with the male participants reporting lower RPE at EF and higher RPE at O and L compared to the female participants (Figure 1). There was a phase-by-sex interaction for perceived recovery (F_2,38 = 21.972, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.536). Perceived recovery was lower (i.e., they felt less recovered) following EF (6.83 ± 0.94; ηp² = 0.825) compared to O (8.83 ± 1.12; p < 0.001) and ML (8.67 ± 0.65; p < 0.001) for the female participants (Figure 2). The female participants (6.83 ± 0.94) had lower perceived recovery after GXT during EF than the male participants (9.00 ± 1.00; p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.577) (Figure 2). There were no observed differences between visits for the subjective parameters for the male participants (Figure 1; Figure 2). Individual data for RPE are shown in Figure 3, and individual data for PRS are shown in Figure 4.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Rating of perceived exertion. Triangle: female participants; box: male participants.*Difference in menses for female participants; EF: early follicular; O: ovulatory; ML: mid-luteal (p < 0.05). All values are represented as mean + SD.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. Perceived recovery scale (PRS).Triangle: female participants; box: male participants; M: menses; O: ovulatory; L: luteal. * Difference in menses for female participants. †Difference from male participants (p < 0.005). All values are represented as mean + SD.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. Rating of perceived exertion individual data. (A) male participants; (B) female participants.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. Perceived recovery score individual data. (A) male participants; (B) female participants.

4 Discussion

The purpose of this study was to examine how the MC affects the subjective and objective variables of aerobic performance within the female participants and in comparison with the male participants over similar time intervals. There were no differences in the objective measures over the phases of the menstrual cycle assessed in the study in the female participants, but there were differences in the subjective measures (Table 1). Specifically, perceived exertion was higher during EF (8.92 ± 0.79) than O (7.67 ± 1.23) and ML (7.75 ± 1.06) in the female participants, while in the male participants, there was no effect of time (Figure 1). Perceived recovery was lower in EF (6.83 ± 0.94) than O (8.83 ± 1.12) and ML (8.67 ± 0.65) in the untrained female participants, while the same effect was not seen in the untrained male participants (Figure 2). In addition, perceived recovery was lower during EF in the female participants (6.83 ± 0.94) compared to the male participants (9.00 ± 1.00; p < 0.001) (Figure 2). There were no significant differences over time for either the objective or subjective measures in the male participants.

4.1 Objective measures

The objective measures of aerobic performance did not significantly differ across the menstrual phases that were examined, which is in agreement with the results of previous studies of untrained, active, and trained female participants (Dombovy et al., 1987; Bemben et al., 1995; Smekal et al., 2007). The high test–retest reliability observed in the present study show that the objective aerobic parameters (VO_2max, RER, peak blood lactate, and peak power) are not affected by the menstrual cycle in the female participants or tests performed at similar time intervals in the male participants.

4.2 Subjective measures

The major findings from this study would suggest that during menses, the female participants felt as if they were exerting more effort during the maximal graded exercise test and felt less recovered 24 h following the maximal aerobic exercise bout. These findings are in contrast with those of some previous research studies, which found no changes in RPE across the menstrual cycle phases (Bailey et al., 2000; Lara et al., 2020). This may be due to differences in the training status of the individuals in the present study compared to the previous studies. VO_2peak for the participants in the present study was ∼30 mL/kg/min compared to ∼50 mL/kg/min (Bailey et al., 2000) and ∼48 mL/kg/min (Lara et al., 2020). Individuals with low fitness or sedentary individuals have been shown to perceive greater exertion during exercise compared to trained individuals (Travlos and Marisi, 1996; Chen et al., 2002). Endurance training enhances oxidative enzyme activity and mitochondrial content, which results in a different metabolic profile compared with other types of training (Egan and Zierath, 2013; Al-Khelaifi et al., 2018). This could impact how female athletes perceive effort compared to untrained female participants. In addition, elite and high-level athletes have been shown to have increased pain tolerance, higher pain thresholds, and lower pain intensity (Pettersen et al., 2020). In addition, endurance athletes have been shown to have better pain tolerance and lower pain intensity than non-athletes (Pettersen et al., 2020).

On the other hand, the present findings are analogous to results found in other studies, which had individuals with lower reported physical activity levels (Caldwell Hooper et al., 2011). One study measured RPE and perceived pain during a treadmill exercise protocol at 65% of measured VO_2max in regularly menstruating female participants who participated in low levels of physical activity (Caldwell Hooper et al., 2011). The authors found that RPE and perceived pain ratings were higher in the female participants during the EF phase when compared to the late follicular and luteal phases. In addition, this study found a moderately strong positive correlation (r = 0.548) between perceived pain and RPE (Caldwell Hooper et al., 2011). This could be due to the fact that the female participants were shown to have increased clinical and experimental pain during the EF phase, which is associated with the declining levels of estrogen and progesterone (Martin, 2009). The authors concluded that RPE and perceived pain ratings were higher in the female participants during the EF phase, and this change is attributed to a drop in concentrations of both sex hormones, estradiol and progesterone, during this phase (Caldwell Hooper et al., 2011). However, this study did not measure hormone levels and used a calendar-based method for estimating the MC phase (Caldwell Hooper et al., 2011). Given the prevalence of menstrual cycle disturbances (Janse De Jonge et al., 2019), a calendar-based method would allow for the possibility that interindividual variations in hormone concentrations and hormone fluctuations across the MC could affect RPE.

There are a few possible explanations for the differences in subjective parameters across the menstrual cycle during exercise including pain perception, which in turn can influence RPE (Borg, 1982). Changes in mechanical and metabolic activities stimulate group III/II afferent neurons, which are involved in the perception of fatigue and pain (Jankowski et al., 2013; Pollak et al., 2014; Amann and Light, 2015). Increased concentrations of metabolites (ATP, lactate, and inorganic phosphate) during exercise have been shown to increase the perception of efforts during exercise (Silva et al., 2021; da Silva et al., 2019), which could be perceived as fatigue and/or pain. Given that the female participants achieved similar peak power, VO_2max, RER, and blood lactate levels, it would be safe to assume that there was a similar level of mechanical and metabolic stimulation across the MC phases in the female participants. A possible explanation for the difference in RPE during exercise across the MC could be due to female participants having a higher sensitivity to a painful stimulus (lower pain threshold) during the follicular phase compared to other phases due to greater activation of brain areas related to general body awareness during the follicular phase (Veldhuijzen et al., 2013). This study found that the brain activity during a painful stimulus was found in the brain regions associated with general body awareness and motor skills and that areas associated with pain modulation were deactivated during the follicular phase (Veldhuijzen et al., 2013). A second possible explanation is the hypoactivity of the brain circuitry systems related to the inhibition of painful stimuli in the female participants. These systems have different activity levels throughout the menstrual cycle and operate more effectively around ovulation when estrogen is high and progesterone is low (Tousignant-Laflamme and Marchand, 2009). Previous research has shown that there is a correlation between pain and RPE during exercise (Rejeski, 1981). Our findings support the complicated interaction of physiological elements to perceive noxious stimuli and perception of efforts across the menstrual cycle.

Lastly, the female participants reported significantly lower PRS (recovery) values during EF compared to both O and ML. Previous research has shown that 24 h post-endurance exercise biomarkers (creatine kinase and IL-6) were higher during the mid-follicular phase than during the luteal phase (Hackney et al., 2019). Considering the antioxidant aspects and reduced levels of estrogen during the follicular phase (Tiidus, 2000), the biomarker results (Hackney et al., 2019), in addition to the findings from the present study, could indicate that there may be a need for greater recovery time in female participants following intense exercise in the early and mid-follicular phases. In trained individuals, greater sleep disturbance in the mid-luteal phase compared to the late-follicular phase was observed (De Martin Topranin et al., 2023). However, in another study, the female participants reported a lower quality of sleep during the 4 days of menses compared to mid-follicular and luteal phases (Baker and Driver, 2004). Decreased sleep quality may have impacted the recovery of female participants, following exercise in the EF phase.

4.2.1 Limitations

The findings of the present study are generalizable only to the young, untrained, and healthy male population and young, healthy, naturally menstruating, and untrained female population. The present study did not directly measure hormone concentrations to test for the presence of corpus luteum and therefore cannot confirm the presence of ovulation in this group of participants. In addition, since hormone levels were not tracked, we could not confirm adequate progesterone levels in the ML phase. Both of these considerations are necessary because data from individuals with disturbed MCs, with smaller hormone fluctuations, could have been included in the data analysis. Subtle differences in the menstrual cycle could affect performance and perception of performance (Janse De Jonge et al., 2019). It was assumed that ovulation could accurately be determined by a spike in BBT. It has been articulated that BBT tracking may not be the most reliable method for tracking MC and estimating ovulation (Guermandi et al., 2001); however, the cost and practicality of this method reinforced its selection of use to schedule the visit during the ovulatory phase in this study (Guermandi et al., 2001).

The measurement of RPE is influenced by factors such as sex, age, fitness level, and familiarity with the testing equipment and protocol (Haddad et al., 2017). Psychological factors possibly including leadership, psychological resistance, and endurance level were previously found to have influences on RPE (Coquart et al., 2012). However, this study attempted to test for psychological impact using the POMS-B mood questionnaire as a screening tool. There were no observed differences for any of the POMS-B categories across the menstrual cycle for the female participants or across time for the male participants.

4.2.2 Conclusion

The results of the present study suggest that the objective measures of aerobic performance such as VO_2max, HR_max, RER, peak blood lactate, and maximal workload are not significantly influenced by menstrual cycle phases. The parameters measured in this study also did not significantly vary across the three timepoints for the male participants, indicating that maximal aerobic performance is relatively stable across 3–6 weeks in untrained participants who were instructed to maintain stable physical activity levels for the duration of the study.

Furthermore, the female participants reported higher RPE during GXT and lower perceived recovery following GXT in EF compared to O and ML. This could be due to changes in the brain activity that inhibit pain perception (Tousignant-Laflamme and Marchand, 2009), a dramatic drop in estradiol and progesterone, an interaction of each of these influences, or something unknown. Present findings warrant a more in-depth analysis of possible neural and hormonal contributors to exercise performance and tolerance across the menstrual cycle, especially during menses.

The findings of the present study suggest controlling for the MC phase in exercise research and training. Physical discomfort for female participants may be higher during menses; therefore, it is recommended to track, account for, and schedule visits based on the MC phase if perceived exertion and recovery are important outcomes.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the University of Oklahoma Norman Campus Institutional Review Board. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

MD: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing. GC: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing. BP: investigation and writing–review and editing. RM: conceptualization, methodology, and writing–review and editing. HP: conceptualization, methodology, and writing–review and editing. CB: conceptualization, methodology, and writing–review and editing. RL: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, and writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding for the project was provided by the Robberson Research Grant from the University of Oklahoma. Financial support for publication was provided by the University of Oklahoma Libraries’ Open Access Fund.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Acosta R. V., Carpenter L. J. (1977). Woman in intercollegiate sport: a longitudinal, national study. Thirty-seven year update. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED570882.

Google Scholar

Al-Khelaifi F., Diboun I., Donati F., Botrè F., Alsayrafi M., Georgakopoulos C., et al. (2018). A pilot study comparing the metabolic profiles of elite-level athletes from different sporting disciplines. Sports Med. Open 4 (1), 2. doi:10.1186/s40798-017-0114-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amann M., Light A. R. (2015). From Petri dish to human: new insights into the mechanisms mediating muscle pain and fatigue, with implications for health and disease. Exp. Physiol. 100 (9), 989–990. doi:10.1113/EP085328

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bailey S. P., Zacher C. M., Mittleman K. D. (2000). Effect of menstrual cycle phase on carbohydrate supplementation during prolonged exercise to fatigue. J. Appl. Physiol. 88 (2), 690–697. doi:10.1152/jappl.2000.88.2.690

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baker F. C., Driver H. S. (2004). Self-reported sleep across the menstrual cycle in young, healthy women. J. Psychosom. Res. 56 (2), 239–243. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00067-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barbieri R. L. (2014). The endocrinology of the menstrual cycle. Methods Mol. Biol. 1154, 145–169. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0659-8_7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bemben D. A., Salm P. C., Salm A. J. (1995). Ventilatory and blood lactate responses to maximal treadmill exercise during the menstrual cycle. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 35 (4), 257–262.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Black C. D., Dobson R. M. (2013). Prior eccentric exercise augments muscle pain and perception of effort during cycling exercise. Clin. J. Pain 29 (5), 443–449. Available at:. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e318262ddfe

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borg G. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc 14 (5), 377–381. doi:10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borresen J., Lambert M. I. (2008). Quantifying training load: a comparison of subjective and objective methods. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 3, 16–30. doi:10.1123/ijspp.3.1.16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caldwell Hooper A. E., Bryan A. D., Eaton M. (2011). Menstrual cycle effects on perceived exertion and pain during exercise among sedentary women. J. Womens Health 20 (3), 439–446. doi:10.1089/jwh.2010.2042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen M. J., Fan X., Moe S. T. (2002). Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J. Sports Sci. 20 (11), 873–899. doi:10.1080/026404102320761787

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi J. C., Park S. K., Kim Y. H., Shin Y. W., Kwon J. S., Kim J. S., et al. (2006). Different brain activation patterns to pain and pain-related unpleasantness during the menstrual cycle. Anesthesiology 105 (1), 120–127. Available at:. doi:10.1097/00000542-200607000-00021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.

Google Scholar

Constantini N. W., Dubnov G., Lebrun C. M. (2005). The menstrual cycle and sport performance. Clin. Sports Med. 24 (2), e51–e82. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2005.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cook D. B., O’Connor P. J., Oliver S. E., Lee Y. (1998). Sex differences in naturally occurring leg muscle pain and exertion during maximal cycle ergometry. Int. J. Neurosci. 95 (3–4), 183–202. doi:10.3109/00207459809003340

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coquart J. B., Tourny-Chollet C., Lemaître F., Lemaire C., Grosbois J. M., Garcin M. (2012). Relevance of the measure of perceived exertion for the rehabilitation of obese patients. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 55 (9–10), 623–640. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2012.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Costello J. T., Bieuzen F., Bleakley C. M. (2014). Where are all the female participants in Sports and Exercise Medicine research? Eur. J. Sport Sci. 14 (8), 847–851. doi:10.1080/17461391.2014.911354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Craft R. M., Mogil J. S., Maria Aloisi A. (2004). Sex differences in pain and analgesia: the role of gonadal hormones. Eur. J. Pain 8 (5), 397–411. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

da Silva J. C. G., Silva K. F., Domingos-Gomes J. R., Batista G. R., da Silva Freitas E. D., Torres V. B. C., et al. (2019). Aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction affects mood state in a similar fashion to high intensity interval exercise. Physiol. Behav. 211, 112677. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Martin Topranin V., Engseth T. P., Hrozanova M., Taylor M., Ø S., Noordhof D. A. (2023). The influence of menstrual-cycle phase on measures of recovery status in endurance athletes: the female endurance athlete project. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 18 (11), 1296–1303. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2022-0325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Demello J. J., Cureton K. J., Boineau R. E., Singh M. M. (1987). Ratings of perceived exertion at the lactate threshold in trained and untrained men and women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc 19 (4), 354–362. doi:10.1249/00005768-198708000-00006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Souza M. J., Maguire M. S., Rubin K. R., Maresh C. M. (1990). Effects of menstrual phase and amenorrhea on exercise performance in runners. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc 22 (5), 575–580. doi:10.1249/00005768-199010000-00006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dombovy M. L., Bonekat H. W., Williams T. J., Staats B. A. (1987). Exercise performance and ventilatory response in the menstrual cycle. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc 19 (2), 111–117. doi:10.1249/00005768-198704000-00008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Egan B., Zierath J. R. (2013). Exercise metabolism and the molecular regulation of skeletal muscle adaptation. Cell. Metab. 17 (2), 162–184. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fillingim R. B., Ness T. J. (2000). Sex-related hormonal influences on pain and analgesic responses. Neurosci. Biobehav Rev. 24 (4), 485–501. doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00017-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Galliven E. A., Singh A., Michelson D., Bina S., Gold P. W., Deuster P. A. (1997). Hormonal and metabolic responses to exercise across time of day and menstrual cycle phase. J. Appl. Physiol. 83 (6), 1822–1831. Available at:. doi:10.1152/jappl.1997.83.6.1822

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gordon D., Scruton A., Barnes R., Baker J., Prado L., Merzbach V. (2018). The effects of menstrual cycle phase on the incidence of plateau at V˙O2max and associated cardiorespiratory dynamics. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 38 (4), 689–698. doi:10.1111/cpf.12469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guermandi E., Vegetti W., Bianchi M. M., Uglietti A., Ragni G., Crosignani P. (2001). Reliability of ovulation tests in infertile women. Obstet. Gynecol. 97 (1), 92–96. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01083-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hackney A. C., Curley C. S., Nicklas B. J. (1991). Physiological responses to submaximal exercise at the mid-follicular, ovulatory and mid-luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 1 (2), 94–98. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.1991.tb00277.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hackney A. C., Kallman A. L., Aǧgön E. (2019). Female sex hormones and the recovery from exercise: menstrual cycle phase affects responses. Biomed. Hum. Kinet. 11 (1), 87–89. doi:10.2478/bhk-2019-0011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haddad M., Stylianides G., Djaoui L., Dellal A., Chamari K. (2017). Session-RPE method for training load monitoring: validity, ecological usefulness, and influencing factors. Front. Neurosci. 11, 612. doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00612

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harber M. P., Kaminsky L. A., Arena R., Blair S. N., Franklin B. A., Myers J., et al. (2017). Impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on all-cause and disease-specific mortality: advances since 2009. Prog. Cardiovasc Dis. 60 (1), 11–20. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2017.03.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Iacovides S., Avidon I., Baker F. C. (2015). Does pain vary across the menstrual cycle? A review. Eur. J. Pain 19 (10), 1389–1405. doi:10.1002/ejp.714

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jankowski M. P., Rau K. K., Ekmann K. M., Anderson C. E., Koerber H. R. (2013). Comprehensive phenotyping of group III and IV muscle afferents in mouse. J. Neurophysiol. 109 (9), 2374–2381. doi:10.1152/jn.01067.2012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Janse De Jonge X., Thompson B., Han A. (2019). Methodological recommendations for menstrual cycle research in sports and exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc 51 (12), 2610–2617. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jurkowski J. E. H., Jones N. L., Toews C. J., Sutton J. R. (1981). Effects of menstrual cycle on blood lactate, O2 delivery, and performance during exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 51 (6), 1493–1499. doi:10.1152/jappl.1981.51.6.1493

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koo T. K., Li M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropr. Med. 15 (2), 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lara B., Gutiérrez-Hellín J., García-Bataller A., Rodríguez-Fernández P., Romero-Moraleda B., Del Coso J. (2020). Ergogenic effects of caffeine on peak aerobic cycling power during the menstrual cycle. Eur. J. Nutr. 59 (6), 2525–2534. doi:10.1007/s00394-019-02100-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larson R. D., Cantrell G. S., Ade C. J., Farrell J. W., Lantis D. J., Barton M. A., et al. (2015). Physiologic responses to two distinct maximal cardiorespiratory exercise protocols. Int. J. Sports Exerc Med. 1 (3), 013. doi:10.23937/2469-5718/1510013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laurent C. M., Green J. M., Bishop P. A., Sjökvist J., Schumacker R. E., Richardson M. T., et al. (2011). A practical approach to monitoring recovery: development of a perceived recovery status scale. J. Strength Cond. Res. 25 (3), 620–628. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c69ec6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lebrun C. M., McKenzie D. C., Prior J. C., Taunton J. E. (1995). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on athletic performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc 27 (3), 437–444. doi:10.1249/00005768-199503000-00022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin V. T. (2009). Ovarian hormones and pain response: a review of clinical and basic science studies. Gend. Med. 6 (Suppl. 2), 168–192. doi:10.1016/j.genm.2009.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McClure Brown J. C. (1973). Postgraduate obstetrics and gynaecology. London, UK: Butterworth.

Google Scholar

Nicklas B. J., Hackney A. C., Sharp R. L. (1989). The menstrual cycle and exercise: performance, muscle glycogen, and substrate responses. Int. J. Sports Med. 10 (4), 264–269. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1024913

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nolan P., Beaven M., Dalleck L. (2014). Comparison of intensities and rest periods for VO2max verification testing procedures. Int. J. Sports Med. 35 (12), 1024–1029. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1367065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oosthuyse T., Bosch A. N. (2010). The effect of the menstrual cycle on exercise metabolism implications for exercise performance in eumenorrhoeic women. Sports Med. 40 (3), 207–227. doi:10.2165/11317090-000000000-00000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pereira H. M., Larson R. D., Bemben D. A. (2020). Menstrual cycle effects on exercise-induced fatigability. Front. Physiol. 11, 517. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pettersen S. D., Aslaksen P. M., Pettersen S. A. (2020). Pain processing in elite and high-level athletes compared to non-athletes. Front. Psychol. 11, 11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01908

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pivarnik J. M., Marichal C. J., Spillman T., Morrow J. R. (1992). Menstrual cycle phase affects temperature regulation during endurance exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 72 (2), 543–548. doi:10.1152/jappl.1992.72.2.543

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pollak K. A., Swenson J. D., Vanhaitsma T. A., Hughen R. W., Jo D., Light K. C., et al. (2014). Exogenously applied muscle metabolites synergistically evoke sensations of muscle fatigue and pain in human subjects. Exp. Physiol. 99 (2), 368–380. doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2013.075812

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rejeski W. J. (1981). The perception of exertion: a social psychophysiological integration. J. Sport Psychol. 3 (4), 305–320. doi:10.1123/jsp.3.4.305

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shacham S. (1983). A shortened version of the profile of mood States. J. Pers. Assess. 47 (3), 305–306. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4703_14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva J. C. G., Domingos-Gomes J. R., Freitas E. D. S., Neto G. R., Aniceto R. R., Bemben M. G., et al. (2021). Physiological and perceptual responses to aerobic exercise with and without blood flow restriction. J. Strength Cond. Res. 35 (9), 2479–2485. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smekal G., Von Duvillard S. P., Frigo P., Tegelhofer T., Pokan R., Hofmann P., et al. (2007). Menstrual cycle: No effect on exercise cardiorespiratory variables or blood lactate concentration. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc 39 (7), 1098–1106. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31805371e7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith M., Wrynn A. (2013). Women in the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic games: an analysis of participation and leadership opportunities. Available at: https://www.womenssportsfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/olympic_report_2012_final-4-11-13.pdf.

Google Scholar

Taipale-Mikkonen R. S., Raitanen A., Hackney A. C., Solli G. S., Valtonen M., Peltonen H., et al. (2021). Influence of menstrual cycle or hormonal contraceptive phase on physiological variables monitored during treadmill testing. Front. Physiol. 12, 12. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.761760

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Teepker M., Peters M., Vedder H., Schepelmann K., Lautenbacher S. (2010). Menstrual variation in experimental pain: correlation with gonadal hormones. Neuropsychobiology 61 (3), 131–140. doi:10.1159/000279303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiidus P. M. (2000). Estrogen and gender effects on muscle damage, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Can. J. Appl. Physiol. 25 (4), 274–287. doi:10.1139/h00-022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tousignant-Laflamme Y., Marchand S. (2009). Excitatory and inhibitory pain mechanisms during the menstrual cycle in healthy women. Pain 146 (1–2), 47–55. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.06.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Travlos A. K., Marisi D. Q. (1996). Perceived exertion during physical exercise among individuals high and low in fitness. Percept. Mot. Ski. 82 (2), 419–424. doi:10.2466/pms.1996.82.2.419

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Veldhuijzen D. S., Keaser M. L., Traub D. S., Zhuo J., Gullapalli R. P., Greenspan J. D. (2013). The role of circulating sex hormones in menstrual cycle-dependent modulation of pain-related brain activation. Pain 154 (4), 548–559. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar