- 1Division of Physical Therapy, Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- 2Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- 3Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- 4Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Introduction: Approximately 69% of 299,000 Americans with spinal cord injury (SCI) suffer debilitating chronic neuropathic pain, which is intractable to treatment. The aim of this study is to determine feasibility, as the primary objective, and estimates of efficacy of a remotely delivered Qigong intervention in adults with SCI-related neuropathic pain, as the secondary objective.
Methods: We recruited adults with SCI-related neuropathic pain, with SCI ≥3 months, with complete or incomplete SCI, and highest neuropathic pain level of >3 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), using nationwide volunteer sampling. Using a non-randomized controlled trial design, participants practiced Spring Forest Qigong’s “Five Element Qigong Healing Movements” (online video) by combining movement to the best of their ability with kinesthetic imagery, at least 3x/week for 12 weeks. Adherence was automatically tracked through the Spring Forest Qigong website. Outcomes of neuropathic pain intensity (NPRS) were assessed weekly, and SCI-related symptoms were assessed at baseline, 6, and 12 weeks of Qigong practice and at 6-week and 1-year follow-ups.
Results: We recruited 23 adults with chronic SCI (7/2021–2/2023). In total, 18 participants started the study and completed all study components, including the 6-week follow-up. Twelve participants completed the 1-year follow-up assessment. Feasibility was demonstrated through participants’ willingness to participate, adherence, and acceptability of the study. Mean age of the 18 participants was 60 ± 12 years, and they were 15 ± 11 years post-SCI with the highest baseline neuropathic pain of 7.94 ± 2.33, which was reduced to 4.17 ± 3.07 after 12 weeks of Qigong practice (Cohen’s d = 1.75). This pain relief remained at 6-week and 1-year follow-ups. Participants reported reduced spasm frequency (change score 1.17 ± 1.20, d = 0.98) and severity (0.72 ± 1.02, d = 0.71), reduced interference of neuropathic pain on mood (3.44 ± 2.53, d = 1.36), sleep (3.39 ± 2.40, d = 1.41), daily activities (3.17 ± 2.77, d = 1.14), greater ability to perform functional activities (6.68 ± 3.07, d = 2.18), and improved mood (2.33 ± 3.31, d = 0.70) after Qigong.
Discussion: Remote Spring Forest Qigong’s “Five Element Qigong Healing Movements” practice is feasible in adults with SCI-related neuropathic pain, with promising prolonged results of neuropathic pain relief and improvement in SCI-related symptoms after Qigong practice.
Clinical trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04917107, identifier NCT04917107
1 Introduction
Chronic neuropathic pain is described as sharp, shooting, stabbing, electric, or burning, and sometimes excruciating pain. The mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain are not completely understood but are commonly reported as being related to damage to the somatosensory system in the peripheral or central nervous system (Raja et al., 2020; Ghazisaeidi et al., 2023). Due to this damage, changes occur at all levels of somatosensory circuitry (i.e., the spinal cord, brainstem, and brain), altering the sensorial communication between the brain and the body, resulting in the development of various degrees of sensory and motor impairment and aberrant pain sensations above, below, or at the level of the lesion (Chambel, Tavares, and Cruz, 2020; Forte et al., 2022). Furthermore, changes in brain function may contribute to neuropathic pain (Hawasli et al., 2018; Huynh et al., 2019; Black et al., 2021).
Chronic neuropathic pain occurring in approximately 69% of the 299,000 Americans with spinal cord injury (SCI) is debilitating and persistent, and it is the most intractable type of chronic pain (Guy et al., 2016; Hatch et al., 2018; Raja et al., 2020; Leitzelar and Koltyn, 2021). Accessible treatment options (exercise and medication) have limited success in reducing pain (Kramer et al., 2017; Hatch et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2020; Felix et al., 2022; National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, 2022). For instance, pain medications result in <50% pain reduction for only approximately 1/3 of the people trying them and some with notable adverse events. Studies conducted with SCI stakeholders confirm that accessible treatments are limited; that pain medications insufficiently relieve pain but carry high risks for addiction and adverse effects; and that improved patient access to non-pharmacological approaches for neuropathic pain is urgently needed (Guy et al., 2016; Hatch et al., 2018; Leitzelar and Koltyn, 2021).
Concurrently with reduced or absent sensation after SCI, accumulating evidence shows that adults with SCI experience body awareness deficits (Lenggenhager et al., 2012; Scandola et al., 2017; Kaur et al., 2019; Leemhuis et al., 2019; Osinski et al., 2020; De Martino et al., 2021; Leemhuis et al., 2021; Moro et al., 2021; Vázquez-Fariñas and Rodríguez-Martin, 2021; Leemhuis et al., 2022; Maggio et al., 2022; Moro et al., 2022; Vastano, Costantini, and Widerstrom-Noga, 2022; Vastano and Widerstrom-Noga, 2023), which is thought to contribute to the production and maintenance of chronic neuropathic pain (Lenggenhager et al., 2012; Leemhuis et al., 2019; Leemhuis et al., 2022; Vastano et al., 2022). Body awareness refers to an attentional focus on and awareness of internal body sensations, including awareness of how the body/body parts are positioned and move in space (Mehling et al., 2011).
Mind and body approaches improve body awareness and thus could be a viable approach to treating neuropathic pain (Impett et al., 2006; Mehling et al., 2011; Naranjo and Schmidt, 2012; Schmalzl et al., 2014; Jong et al., 2016; Mehling et al., 2018). However, research demonstrating the effectiveness of mind and body approaches for reducing pain in SCI is limited to seven studies among which only two (yoga and Tai Chi) (Shem et al., 2016; Curtis et al., 2017; Chalageri et al., 2021) reported pain reduction but without mentioning the type of pain (Tsang et al., 2015; Shem et al., 2016; Curtis et al., 2017; Qi et al., 2018; Madhusmita and Ebnezar, 2019; Hearn and Cross, 2020; Chalageri et al., 2021). Mind and body research in SCI is recent, and often movement modifications are needed to allow participation by adults with SCI. Chalageri et al. (2021) reported pain reduction after yoga meditation combined with conventional rehabilitation, mostly benefitting adults with acute SCI and paraplegia (Chalageri et al., 2021). Curtis et al. (2017) reported greater improvements in depressive symptoms and self-compassion, but not pain, in adults with SCI practiced adaptive yoga vs. waitlist group (Curtis et al., 2017). A seated Tai Chi program was well tolerated in adults with SCI with benefits in pain, emotional sense, and physical sense of wellbeing after each session, but the weekly in-person classes had a dropout rate of 60% (Shem et al., 2016). Tsang et al. (2015) reported greater improved dynamic sitting balance and grip strength after 12 weeks of sitting Tai Chi in 11 adults with SCI vs. eight controls (Tsang et al., 2015). With the exception of Chalageri et al.’s study (n = 91), sample sizes were small (n = 23, n = 26, and n = 19), and only Tsang et al. (2015) included adults with incomplete tetraplegia; all others recruited adults with paraplegia only. Thus, studies with accessible interventions for adults with tetraplegia are needed. Of the mind and body approaches, Qigong seems the most accessible approach for adults with SCI due to the simple, gentle movements, combined with a focus on breathing and body awareness. Remote Qigong delivery provides a feasible approach for adults with SCI as it eliminates reported in-person intervention barriers of transportation and scheduling difficulties (Huberty et al., 2017).
Therefore, our primary objective was to determine the feasibility of a 12-week Qigong practice with a remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong “Five Element Healing Movements” video in adults with SCI-related neuropathic pain. Qigong could be practiced in standing, sitting, or lying positions. Our Qigong practice combined actively moving to the participant’s ability level with kinesthetic imagery, i.e., focusing on the feeling of moving the whole body as if in an upright position, because imagery may be an additional way to improve body awareness and reduce pain (Scandola et al., 2017; Kaur et al., 2019). Therefore, adults with high-level tetraplegia after SCI could practice Qigong in their power wheelchair or lying down. In contrast, in other studies, the requirement of minimum active muscle strength to perform the exercises often excludes them. Our secondary objective was to calculate estimates of the efficacy of Qigong practice in adults with SCI-related neuropathic pain to inform future efficacy clinical trials.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study design and recruitment
Full detail of the protocol can be found in Van de Winckel et al. (2023a). We used nationwide volunteer sampling through fliers and announcements on relevant websites, in the community, through the M Health/Fairview healthcare recruitment system, and in locations within the Minnesota Regional Spinal Cord Injury Model System (MN SCIMS). More specifically, we recruited from all clinical site partners within the MN SCIMS, which include hospitals, clinics, and rehabilitation centers in the Twin Cities and Mayo Clinic in Rochester. We have ongoing collaborations within the Twin Cities with the UMN Medical Center, M Health/Fairview; MN SCI associations; Regions Hospital; Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute; Get Up Stand Up to Cure Paralysis; Unite2Ffight Paralysis, and Fit4Recovery. Healthcare providers provided enrollment information and materials to potential participants and posted fliers in their locations. M Health/Fairview had a recruitment system in place where approximately 1,000 letters were sent from the electronic medical record system directly to patients with SCI and neuropathic pain. Patients who were interested in participating contacted the researchers. This was a very successful method of recruitment. Furthermore, we received calls and emails from potential participants from all over the United States when they saw study information from professional websites displaying information on the studies (through fliers or interview) or when they found the study through ClinTrial.gov.
2.2 Participants
We recruited adults with complete or incomplete SCI ≥3 months, medically stable, and with the highest neuropathic pain level of >3/10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (Hanley et al., 2006) who were willing to participate in a 12-week Remote Qigong practice (mind-body approach), fluent in English, and had access to the internet and a computer/iPad or smartphone.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki principles (2013) (WMA Declaration of Helsinki–Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, 2021). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Minnesota (IRB# STUDY00011997). The CONSORT reporting guidelines were followed (Moher et al., 2010; Boutron et al., 2017). After signing HIPAA/informed eConsent, study staff members acquired demographic information, general health, medical history, screened for cognitive impairments (Mini-Mental State Examination-short version, cutoff score <13/16) (Folstein, Folstein, and McHugh, 1975; Cummings, 1993), and for kinesthetic motor imagery ability (Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, cutoff score <15/25 points) (Malouin et al., 2007). Data were collected on REDCap, which uses a MySQL database via a secure web interface.
2.3 Intervention
We used the Spring Forest Qigong’s “Five Element Healing Movements” video (41 min), in which Grand Master Lin demonstrates five gentle horizontal and vertical arm and leg movements in specific postures in the standing position. A Qigong Master (Spring Forest Qigong Center, Minnesota) taught the 6-h introductory class over Zoom. Participants accessed the video with a study number and password and were asked to practice at least 3x/week for 12 weeks in any location of their choice with an internet connection. Figure 1 shows the five Qigong movements. More details are available in Van de Winckel et al. (2023a). Participants were instructed to actively move along with the video however much they comfortably could and to perform kinesthetic imagery at the same time. The first author developed specific kinesthetic imagery instructions to allow participants with all levels of mobility to participate maximally in the Qigong practice: participants were asked to focus on the feeling of the body as if they were standing up (regardless of whether they were actually standing, sitting, or lying down) and to imagine the feeling of the soles of their feet being in contact with the floor and the feeling of the flow while imagining performing the whole-body movements, rather than to “visualize” the whole-body movement. If reproducing this feeling was difficult, participants were asked to associate positive memories from before their SCI with this imagined standing posture, i.e., the feeling of warm sand under the soles of their feet when walking on the beach.
FIGURE 1. Spring Forest Qigong’s “Five Element Qigong Healing Movements”. The five movements are presented in clockwise order. Movement 1: moving of Yin and Yang; movement 2: breathing of the universe; movement 3: connecting with the heaven and Earth; movement 4: connecting with your body’s energy; and movement 5: connecting with your heart’s energy. Details of how the different movements are performed are presented in Van de Winckel et al. (2023a).
During the 6-week follow-up, participants were not practicing Qigong, but afterward, participants could restart their Qigong practice at the frequency of their choice so we could evaluate behavioral changes, neuropathic pain, and function at 1-year follow-up.
2.4 Outcome measures
2.4.1 Primary outcome
Based on prior literature (Rounsaville, Carroll, and Onken, 2001; Czajkowski et al., 2015; Winckers et al., 2015; Greenberg et al., 2020; 2019; Carl et al., 2020), we assessed the following a priori feasibility indicators for our primary objective: recruitment estimate of 40% of adults with complete SCI and 60% of adults with incomplete SCI; Qigong adherence of minimum 70% of participants practicing at least 2x/week; maximum 30% attrition; none of the questionnaires fully missing in >25% of the participants; mild study-related adverse events in maximum 10% of participants; and ≥70% participants satisfied with the program. Quotes from participants were used to identify satisfaction with the Qigong practice and the study. Video access (day, time, and duration) was automatically tracked via the Spring Forest Qigong website, and the logs were provided to the first author. The first author, a certified Spring Forest Qigong practice group leader, level 5 of 5 in the Spring Forest Qigong with Qigong practice experience, organized weekly 1:1 check-ins to address questions, perceptions, effects, and satisfaction with the Qigong practice, demonstrate movements if needed, and monitor adverse events. Given the slow, gentle movements, kinesthetic imagery, and weekly check-ins, we considered Qigong practice risks minimal and limited to mild transient discomfort. Participants continued with regular healthcare appointments and neuropathic pain medication if needed, but other health appointments for neuropathic pain (e.g., osteopathy) were not permitted during the study to avoid concomitant effects.
2.4.2 Secondary outcomes
As estimate of efficacy outcomes for larger future randomized controlled trials, graduate students called participants weekly to monitor the highest, average, and lowest neuropathic pain intensity ratings (NPRS) (Hanley et al., 2006). Distinctions between types of pain were made using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders-Common Data Elements (NINDS-CDE) International SCI Pain Basic Data Set Version 2.0 (Widerström-Noga et al., 2014). The graduate students noted neuropathic pain medication dosage taken that week, recent illnesses, and healthcare utilization, including recent hospitalizations.
Other outcome measures were collected by graduate students over Zoom at five time points: baseline, 6 weeks (mid-Qigong practice), 12 weeks (end of Qigong practice), 6-week follow-up, and 1-year follow-up.
The NINDS-CDE International SCI Pain Basic Data Set Version 2.0 (Widerström-Noga et al., 2014) also assessed pain dimensions (e.g., pain location) and how intense pain interferes with mood, activity, and sleep. We evaluated the frequency of spasms and spasm severity (Penn Spasm Frequency Scale) (Mills et al., 2018); mood (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9) (Kroenke, Spitzer, and Williams, 2001; Bombardier et al., 2004; Krause et al., 2009; Krause, Reed, and McArdle, 2010; Fann et al., 2011); anxiety (Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) (Spielberger et al., 1983); body appreciation (Functionality Appreciation Scale, FAS) (Alleva, Tylka, and Kroon Van Diest, 2017); and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life Instruments, WHOQOL-BREF) (Jang et al., 2004). Participants self-reported on whether cardiovascular, bladder, bowel, and sexual functions were normal, abnormal, or absent (Autonomic Standards Assessment Form) (Krassioukov et al., 2012). Functional performance was assessed with the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index (SCI/FI) (Slavin et al., 2016), across four domains: basic mobility, self-care, fine motor function, and ambulation (Keeney et al., 2018). Participants self-identified goals related to important daily life activities that were currently difficult to perform because of neuropathic pain (Patient-Specific Functional Scale, PSFS) (Westaway, Stratford, and Binkley, 1998).
2.5 Statistical analysis
2.5.1 Sample size
Power and sample size calculations were made based on estimates from another body awareness therapy (i.e., cognitive multisensory rehabilitation) in adults with SCI (Van de Winckel et al., 2023b). Assuming the same SD estimate, n = 18 participants have >98% power to detect the same pain reduction of 2.31 points on the NPRS (d = 1.12) with a two-sided significance level of 0.05 using a paired t-test, and 80% power to detect a pain reduction of 1.46 points (d = 0.72). A 30% attrition rate would result in 80% power to detect a pain reduction of 1.85 points (d = 0.89).
2.5.2 Statistical analysis
Per-protocol analyses were conducted for all outcomes for our secondary objective. We have added intent-to-treat analyses for the ANOVA tests and longitudinal modeling of the pain outcomes. We imputed the data with multiple imputations using the “mice” package in R, conducted the ANOVA test, Tukey’s post hoc comparisons, and the longitudinal modeling using linear mixed models for each imputed dataset, and averaged the results across all datasets.
The present data provide an estimate of key trial elements to determine whether to proceed to a larger randomized controlled trial. Quantitative variables are summarized using descriptive statistics at each time point. We used standard statistical software R version 4.2.1. Data from the first 12 weeks were analyzed using a repeated-measures ANOVA, with Tukey’s post hoc tests to evaluate changes between every pair of time points. The data at 1-year follow-up with missingness were compared to each of the time points during the 12-week main study using the paired t-tests with Bonferroni correction of the p-values.
3 Results
3.1 Demographic and behavioral data and feasibility measures
Figure 2 shows the CONSORT study flow chart of this non-randomized clinical trial. We recruited 23 adults with SCI between 1 July 2021 and 2 February 2023. We exceeded the a priori set feasibility benchmarks by retaining 18 participants (i.e., 82% retention) who completed the study, with 100% adherence to all study components, including the 6-week follow-up. Reconsenting (n = 12) at 1-year follow-up assessment was completed on 2 February 2023.
Table 1 displays the demographic and behavioral data of the participants. Among the 18 adults, six were women, 10 had paraplegia, and eight had tetraplegia; 33% of adults had a complete SCI (i.e., slightly below our estimated 40% recruitment). Mean age was 59.61 ± 11.54 years (range 30-76 years), and they were 15.17 ± 11.16 years post-SCI (1–40 years). The sex ratio of new SCI cases of men to women is approximately 4:1 (i.e., 78%). We enrolled a representative sample of women with SCI (33.33%), adults, 65+ years of age (38.89%), adults living in rural areas (33.33%), and veterans (16.67%). Despite recruiting nationally, all participants were non-Hispanic White people, pointing to the need for more diverse recruitment strategies. Approximately 67% of the participants had socioeconomic distress and were dependent on Medicare/Medicaid. Almost 17% of the participants were below the poverty threshold (Federal Poverty Guidelines - ProJusticeMN, 2023).
TABLE 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of adults with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain.
3.2 Outcome measures
For our primary objective, we exceeded our a priori benchmark of a minimum 70% of participants practicing at least 2x/week: group average was 169.72 min or 137.98% of the required Qigong practice intensity (3x/week). There were no study-related adverse events.
Participants almost unanimously reported that they could not wait to get back to the Qigong practice after the 6-week follow-up because they benefitted so much from it. At 1-year follow-up, one person was still performing Qigong every day. Five participants used Qigong when needed as a tool to bring their pain down. Two participants developed their own methods of breathing and mindfulness, based on what they learned in the program. Four participants had not performed Qigong since the end of the intervention period.
In total, 17 out of 18 participants (94.44%) were satisfied with the program (exceeding the 70% benchmark). One person [59-year-old man] was neutral and expressed: “I feel neutral about the Qigong exercises and weekly calls. I am pain-free now, and my goals (PSFS) were all achieved at week 6 and were still achieved at week 12.”
For our secondary objectives, all means and standard deviations of the outcome measures are listed in Table 2. The main findings are reported in the following paragraphs.
TABLE 2. Primary and secondary outcome measures in adults with SCI-related neuropathic pain at five time points.
The results with repeated-measures ANOVA (Table 2) showed a significant reduction in the highest, average, and lowest neuropathic pain levels from baseline to 12 weeks of Qigong, which was maintained at the 6-week (n = 18) and 1-year follow-ups (n = 12). Some participants had urinary tract infections or underwent surgeries at 1-year follow-up, causing a temporary increase in the highest neuropathic pain levels. The highest, average, and lowest pain all showed a significant reduction over time for both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. The ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc comparisons showed a significant reduction in pain pre–post Qigong practice, and no significant changes were observed between post-Qigong and 6-week follow-up.
The weekly highest, average, and lowest neuropathic pain intensity ratings (NPRS) (Hanley et al., 2006) are shown in Figure 3. The highest neuropathic pain level at baseline was 7.94 ± 2.33. After 12 weeks of Qigong, there was a reduction of 3.78 points (large effect size, Cohen’s d = 1.75), 2.06 points (d = 1.12), and 1.39 points (d = 1.08) for highest, average, and lowest neuropathic pain levels, respectively, exceeding a minimal clinically important difference for the highest and average neuropathic pain levels (>1.80 points) (Williamson and Hoggart, 2005; Hanley et al., 2006; Galhardoni et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2020). After 12 weeks of Qigong, four participants were pain-free, and nine participants scored 0 on their lowest neuropathic pain. Pain reduction was maintained over the 6-week follow-up period (three were completely pain-free, and nine participants scored 0 on the lowest neuropathic pain). The person who was pain-free after 12 weeks of Qigong but not at the 6-week follow-up reported that the increased pain was due to the ongoing bladder issues and that his highest pain occurred infrequently. In total, 15 out of 18 participants reported significant pain reduction. Those that did not report any pain reduction shared that they enjoyed “listening” or “watching” the video but did not perform the kinesthetic imagery or did not apply the kinesthetic imagery tools in daily life or had significant pressure ulcers. Pressure ulcers or urinary tract infections during the study could cause temporary increases in neuropathic pain. However, even those three participants reported that they enjoyed watching the video and moving; they had fewer spasms, better sleep, and it was relaxing and calming.
FIGURE 3. Weekly neuropathic pain levels for highest, average, and lowest pain in 18 adults with SCI. The 12-week Qigong training is highlighted in yellow. During the 6-week follow-up (n = 18), participants did not practice Qigong but implemented body awareness in daily life. Between the 6-week and 1-year follow-ups, participants could restart the Qigong practice at the frequency of their choice (n = 12).
After 12 weeks of Qigong, participants also reported reduced spasm frequency (change score 1.17 ± 1.20, d = 0.98) and severity (0.72 ± 1.02, d = 0.71), and reduced interference of neuropathic pain on activity (3.44 ± 2.53, d = 1.36), mood (3.39 ± 2.40, d = 1.41), and sleep (3.17 ± 2.77, d = 1.14, Figure 4 1). Participants performed better on functional activities (PSFS, 6.68 ± 3.07, d = 2.18, Figure 5), had reduced anxiety (state anxiety, −5.33 ± 11.84, d = 0.45; trait anxiety, −4.83 ± 6.19, d = 0.78), improved mood (2.33 ± 3.31, d = 0.70), body appreciation (−0.29 ± 0.48, d = 0.60), and quality of life (physical health, 7.94 ± 10.59, d = 0.75; psychological health, 5.00 ± 9.13, d = 0.55; social relationships, 6.56 ± 11.27, d = 0.58; and environment, 1.78 ± 7.06, d = 0.25). Overall, participants reported more intense daily activity (e.g., reorganizing furniture). One person could play the piano again after 3 years for 30 min/day, which is his favorite hobby. These significant improvements were maintained at follow-ups.
FIGURE 4. Clinical assessments of the NINDS-CDE International SCI Pain Basic Data Set Version 2.0.1. Average score of interference of neuropathic pain with activity, mood, and sleep. Assessments were taken at baseline, 6-week Qigong practice, 12-week Qigong practice, 6-week follow-up, and 1-year follow-up.
FIGURE 5. Clinical assessments of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Average score of ability to perform three functional activities. Assessments were taken at baseline, 6 weeks of Qigong practice, 12 weeks of Qigong practice, 6-week follow-up, and 1-year follow-up.
The results from the post hoc tests showed that cardiovascular function improved between baseline and 6-week follow-up and was maintained at 1-year follow-up, and participants’ reports confirmed that this was related to improved temperature regulation. Four participants could better feel the need for bowel movements (greater interoception); they had improved sphincter control and were better at avoiding leakage. Four other participants could feel and enjoy sexual activity more, which was reflected by improvements in sexual function on the Autonomic Standards Assessment Form. Two participants reported increased awareness of the need to urinate or feeling urine passing through the catheter. Several participants became more aware when something was “off” in their bodies, and thus they could address urinary tract infections or uncomfortable seating positions quicker.
Finally, participants with paraplegia reported improved balance, which was reflected in improved scores in basic mobility, self-care, and fine motor function on the SCI/FI assessment. An example of improved fine motor function was that they did not need to use their hands anymore for balance and, thus, could do fine motor activities while sitting in the wheelchair. Participants with tetraplegia improved in self-care.
4 Discussion
The results of this pilot non-randomized controlled trial demonstrate feasibility and adherence to a remote Qigong intervention and study protocol. Qigong practice was well tolerated with no study-related adverse events. The vast majority of participants enjoyed Qigong practice and continued practicing as needed afterward, pointing to a change in behavior that helped them gain control over an otherwise debilitating symptom. The feedback from some of the participants after the Spring Forest Qigong practice can be found in the following paragraphs:
[65-year-old woman] “It got me back in touch with meditating that I felt I was missing in my life. At times, I have more body awareness which can further increase over time. I have much less pain. I am grateful and glad that I was able to do it.”
[68-year-old man] “The fact that the pain is reduced makes life more pleasurable, especially with social contacts (family gatherings).”
[53-year-old man] “Qigong is relaxing and calming. That relaxed and calm feeling carries over into the day.”
[76-year-old man] “Two thumbs up. I can’t say enough good about it, how many good things it is doing for me. I am practicing almost every day. Before the study, I was ready to jump from a building (“ready to get out of this body”) and now I do not have these feelings anymore. The underlying results are excellent: pain-free, no spasms, sleep is good now, calmer, can handle things better. I can play the piano again after 3 years. Before the study, I was antsy after about 15 min at the computer, and I had to take a nap on the bed. Now I can sit at the computer for 3–4 h, and it feels good. At night, I used to be cold and needed a sweatshirt to sleep. Now I stay comfortably warm, and I do not need the sweatshirt anymore. In the last 2 weeks, I also regained sensation of the catheter. I feel when urine is passing through which I could not feel before.”
[46-year-old woman] “It was really helpful to get more in tune with my body. My pain is down, and I am sleeping better. I knew that if I signed up for the study I would do it because of outside accountability. There was curiosity involved. The Qigong was relaxing and soothing. It was helpful for my children as well. The plantar fasciitis is better. It is healing faster. The tingling in the feet is better, and the pain is down so I am sleeping better. I am more social; I have more energy and organize things easier. I have more control over life. It is easier now for me to make decisions and to undertake a big thing like a move.”
[58-year-old man] “I am over the moon! I never thought that it would go this well. Before the study, I was spending much time in the shower to deal with the pain and now, I have had no need at all anymore for that. My feeling has been that it was absolutely wonderful! I am so happy for the opportunity to be part of this study because it made so much difference. I do not need to lay in the shower anymore to reduce the pain, and I was able to sit for a whole day inspiring students and researchers by sharing my journey, telling them: And here is this study … what a difference it is making in people’s lives. The idea that there is something out there that could help me, considering how long ago I had the SCI (29 years of dealing with this pain!). . . and here in only 8 weeks it makes a profound difference in my life. It gives people hope. Prior to the study, I would not have been able to sit here and talk to you for so long. This is another proof of how profound the difference is that this study has made.”
[60-year-old woman] “What you practice grows stronger. It stayed with me. The positivity part has been more prominent there for me. My life is changing a lot. I have been able to realize that those five emotions from the Five Element Qigong Healing Movements are what I want for my life. There are changes in friendship. I have stopped taking calls from negative people and spent more time with positive people. As simple as those points are, they are profound. Years ago, a therapist told me that you can decide in the morning how you want to use your energy. That makes sense now. I have been using energy now to bring joy and contentment. I have been a lot more active, I do not have to lay down anymore during the day.”
Specific exercises that participants preferred were the bouncing (at the beginning of the video), the focus on positive emotions, and movements 2 and 5. Some participants liked the second movement because of the focus on the vertical alignment and flow in the body (head to toe) while gently moving the arms in an elliptical movement up and down and the fifth movement for the connection with the gratitude feeling and heart’s energy. They also reported that the kinesthetic imagery, e.g., imagining the feeling of how the foot would leave imprints in the sand or being aware/imagining the weight shift in the pelvis during transfers and at other moments (e.g., during sitting in the wheelchair) helped with reducing the pain.
Twelve weeks of Qigong practice appears to be the best duration for sustained neuropathic pain reduction (Table 2). The participants reported that the video was easy to follow and understand. The Qigong practice frequency is feasible given that the majority of participants practiced more often than the requested 3x/week. The adaptation to the Qigong practice for adults with SCI by combining active movements to their ability level with kinesthetic imagery seemed particularly an effective and worth pursuing further in a larger study.
In addition to pain reduction and improvements in mood and function, participants reported a change in mindset in how they approached their pain. At baseline, participants distracted themselves from pain or ignored pain, and as a result, the pain worsened often. After Qigong practice, many participants shared that they learned how to connect with their body, developed the ability to listen to their bodies, and understood when their bodies gave signals of an uncomfortable position or situation (e.g., bowel or bladder issue). Participants felt they reacted quicker to these signals, and the uncomfortable feeling did not develop into pain. Examples include that participants more quickly repositioned themselves in the chair to avoid pressure sores, or participants were able to identify quicker when they had a urinary tract infection or that “something was off” in the body, prompting them to get medical help and treatment (e.g., detecting iron deficiency and receiving iron supplements). Events like urinary tract infections could cause short neuropathic pain flare-ups. However, given that chronic neuropathic pain is persistent and refractory to medications, the observed long-standing pain reduction all through the study is very likely related to the Qigong practice. Additionally, we observed in another study on adults with spinal cord injury that chronic neuropathic pain does not change when only medication (treatment-as-usual) is given (Van de Winckel et al., 2023b). Yet, our results need to be investigated in a future randomized controlled trial with a greater sample size.
There are different concepts around mindset. One concept distinguishes a growth mindset [i.e., believing that qualities can be cultivated and expanded through personal investment (Thames and Webster, 2015)] from a fixed mindset (i.e., believing that change is a threat). Another concept distinguished “stress-is-enhancing” mindset (i.e., stress leads to better performance, productivity, health, wellbeing, learning, and growth). which is also related to the ability to positively reframe a situation, greater wellbeing, and fewer depressive symptoms, from “stress-is-debilitating” mindset (Grünenwald et al., 2023). The latter (stress is debilitating) has been reported more frequently in adults with chronic pain vs. those without chronic pain. Similarly, views of coping with the pandemic (it is an opportunity vs. it is manageable vs. it is a catastrophe), where the first two groups (i.e., opportunity and manageable) reported greater wellbeing than those who viewed COVID-19 as a catastrophe (Zion et al., 2022).
While we did not specifically evaluate the type of mindset through questionnaires, the fact that the study used volunteer sampling might have attracted adults who were willing to try something new. Most of our participants had not heard of Qigong prior to entering the study, and some were skeptical about the ability of Qigong being able to help reduce pain, but they were willing to invest their time and explore the effects, given the debilitating situation of the neuropathic pain. Their skepticism often evaporated and their enthusiasm grew after the first effects of pain reduction were perceived, and they experienced an increased feeling of control over their body and confidence about being able to successfully do something to relieve the pain.
The increased body awareness and ability to listen to body cues, as well as being calmer, having better mood, better sleep, and being able to deal with things better were consistently reported among the participants. They also reported having more in control over their life, having more energy, and more confidence knowing that they now had tools to deal with the pain if the pain would come up again. They reported having a calmer mind and a calm body, feeling more peace and restful, more connectedness/in tune with the body. They figured out more quickly when something was not right. They experienced more happiness, and were ready to interact socially again, changing the circle of friends if needed by seeking out those with a positive outlook on life, or they reported taking on life goals or bigger house tasks such as rearranging furniture, or bidding on a house, or moving. One person reported it is easier now to make decisions and undertake big things, like a move. They reported that also other types of pain (e.g., plantar fasciitis or elbow tendonitis) got better. One participant reported her children enjoyed doing the Qigong with her. They also felt that the positive emotions and gratitude practiced during Qigong carried over into daily life.
There are some limitations to this study. The volunteer sampling may have led to selection bias of those that chose to invest in a 12-week program and thus may limit generalization. This non-randomized pilot clinical trial was conducted in a small sample, and thus validation in a larger sample with a randomized clinical trial design is needed. Even though we did not have a control group in this study, we know from our other studies with a control group of adults with spinal cord injury with similar intensity levels of neuropathic pain (n = 14) that 6 weeks of standard of care only (i.e., neuropathic pain medication) did not change their neuropathic pain levels or any other SCI-related measures (Van de Winckel et al., 2023b). We are therefore confident that the proposed results are due to Qigong and not due to the placebo. Moreover, neuropathic pain is known to be resistant to pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions such as surgery, neurostimulation (Forte et al., 2022), and physical and psychological therapy, and therefore the large effect size results seen with Qigong are very encouraging. Furthermore, while we recruited participants living in remote areas and/or in financial distress, diversity in terms of race and ethnicity was missing. For example, adults of the Hispanic background account for 17.4% of the US population, or 55.4 million, (Velasco-Mondragon et al., 2016), and represent 8.3% of all SCI since 2005 (Spinal Cord Medicine, 2011; Spinal Cord Injury Statistics, 2016). Yet, they are underrepresented in SCI rehabilitation studies (National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, 2022).
In conclusion, our pilot data demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of practicing Qigong in adults with SCI-related neuropathic pain, generating promising results in terms of neuropathic pain and SCI-related symptoms. The data from the present work will inform the design of future randomized controlled trials. The remote delivery of Qigong offers multiple applications for use in the home or community. Further studies in adults with SCI of different races and ethnicity and Qigong delivery in other languages are needed.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at the Dryad repository: doi: 10.5061/dryad.6t1g1jx43.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Minnesota. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
Specific contributions include conception or design of the work: AVdW. Recruitment: AVdW and LM. Data acquisition: AVdW, SC, and WD. Data curation: AVdW, SC, and WD. Data analysis, visualization, and interpretation of the evidence: AVdW, LZ, SC, WD, AP, RB, and LM. Writing of the original draft: AVdW. Writing, review, and editing: AVdW, LZ, SC, WD, AP, RB, and LM. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was funded by the Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota. The research was supported by the National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (grant UL1TR002494).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Qigong Grand Master Chunyi Lin, MS, and Qigong Master Jaci Gran from the SFQ for their consultancy and assistance with providing the teaching and content of the “Five Element Qigong Healing Movements.” The authors thank Mrs. Debra Lin and Mr. Collin Silas for their administrative and logical assistance. The authors thank the participants and all adults with SCI-related neuropathic pain who gave their valuable input on the research questions, intervention, assessments, and elements of the study design. The authors also thank Marc Noël for the critical review of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Author disclaimer
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
Abbreviations
FA, Functionality Appreciation Scale; IRB, Institutional Review Board; NINDS-CDE, Neurological Disorders-Common Data Elements; NPRS, Numeric Pain Rating Scale; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PSFS, Patient-Specific Functional Scale; SCI, spinal cord injury; SCI/FI, Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index; WHOQOL-BREF, World Health Organization Quality of Life Instruments.
References
Alleva, J. M., Tylka, T. L., and Kroon Van Diest, A. M. (2017). The functionality appreciation Scale (FAS): development and psychometric evaluation in U.S. Community women and men. Body Image 23, 28–44. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.07.008
Black, S. R., Jace, B., King, M., Mahan, A., Anderson, J., and Butson, C. R. (2021). Functional hyperconnectivity and task-based activity changes associated with neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Front. Neurology 12, 613630. doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.613630
Bombardier, C. H., Scott Richards, J., Krause, J. S., Tulsky, D., and Tate, D. G. (2004). Symptoms of major depression in people with spinal cord injury: implications for screening. Archives Phys. Med. Rehabilitation 85 (11), 1749–1756. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.07.348
Boutron, I., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., and Ravaud, P. (2017). CONSORT statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: a 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts. Ann. Intern. Med. 167 (1), 40–47. doi:10.7326/M17-0046
Carl, J., Grüne, E., Popp, J., and Pfeifer, K. (2020). Physical activity promotion for apprentices in nursing care and automotive mechatronics–competence counts more than volume. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 (3), 793. doi:10.3390/ijerph17030793
Chalageri, E., Vishwakarma, G., Lal Ranjan, R., Govindaraj, R., and Singh Chhabra, H. (2021). Effect of rāja yoga meditation on psychological and functional outcomes in spinal cord injury patients. Int. J. Yoga 14 (1), 36–42. doi:10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_68_20
Chambel, S. S., Tavares, I., and Cruz, C. D. (2020). Chronic pain after spinal cord injury: is there a role for neuron-immune dysregulation? Front. Physiology 11, 748. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00748
Cummings, J. L. (1993). Mini-mental state examination. Norms, normals, and numbers. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 269, 2420–2421. doi:10.1001/jama.269.18.2420
Curtis, K., Hitzig, S. L., Bechsgaard, G., Stoliker, C., Alton, C., Saunders, N., et al. (2017). Evaluation of a specialized yoga program for persons with a spinal cord injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J. Pain Res. 1, 999–1017. doi:10.2147/JPR.S130530
Czajkowski, S. M., Powell, L. H., Adler, N., Naar-King, S., Reynolds, K. D., Hunter, C. M., et al. (2015). From ideas to efficacy: the ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol. Official J. Div. Health Psychol. Am. Psychol. Assoc. 34 (10), 971–982. doi:10.1037/hea0000161
De Martino, M., De Bartolo, M., Leemhuis, E., and Pazzaglia, M. (2021). Rebuilding body–brain interaction from the vagal network in spinal cord injuries. Brain Sci. 11 (8), 1084. doi:10.3390/brainsci11081084
Fann, J. R., Bombardier, C. H., Richards, J. S., Tate, D. G., Wilson, C. S., et al. (2011). Depression after spinal cord injury: comorbidities, mental health service use, and adequacy of treatment. Archives Phys. Med. Rehabilitation 92 (3), 352–360. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.016
Federal Poverty Guidelines - ProJusticeMN (2023). Federal poverty guidelines. Available at: https://www.projusticemn.org/fedpovertyguidelines/ (Accessed February 9, 2023).
Felix, E. R., Cardenas, D. D., Bryce, T. N., Charlifue, S., Lee, T. K., MacIntyre, B., et al. (2022). Prevalence and impact of neuropathic and nonneuropathic pain in chronic spinal cord injury. Archives Phys. Med. Rehabilitation 103 (4), 729–737. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.06.022
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., and McHugh, P. R. (1975). ‘Mini-Mental state’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatric Res. 12 (3), 189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Forte, G., Giuffrida, V., Scuderi, A., and Pazzaglia, M. (2022). Future treatment of neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: the challenges of nanomedicine, supplements or opportunities? Biomedicines 10 (6), 1373. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10061373
Galhardoni, R., Aparecida da Silva, V., García-Larrea, L., Dale, C., Abrahão, F., Barbosa, L. M., et al. (2019). Insular and anterior cingulate cortex deep stimulation for central neuropathic pain: disassembling the percept of pain. Neurology 92 (18), e2165–e2175. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007396
Ghazisaeidi, S., Muley, M. M., Tu, Y. S., Finn, D. P., Kolahdouzan, M., Pitcher, G. M., et al. (2023). Conserved transcriptional programming across sex and species after peripheral nerve injury predicts treatments for neuropathic pain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2023. doi:10.1111/bph.16168
Greenberg, J., Lin, A., Zale, E. L., Kulich, R. J., James, P., Millstein, R. A., et al. (2019). Development and early feasibility testing of A mind-body physical activity program for patients with heterogeneous chronic pain; the GetActive study. J. Pain Res. 1, 3279–3297. doi:10.2147/JPR.S222448
Greenberg, J., Popok, P. J., Lin, A., Kulich, R. J., James, P., Macklin, E. A., et al. (2020). A mind-body physical activity program for chronic pain with or without a digital monitoring device: proof-of-concept feasibility randomized controlled trial. JMIR Form. Res. 4 (6), e18703. doi:10.2196/18703
Grünenwald, I., Kaluza, A. J., Schultze, M., and van Dick, R. (2023). Stress mindset and social identification in chronic pain patients and their relationship to coping, well-being & depression. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings 30 (1), 153–168. doi:10.1007/s10880-022-09883-8
Guy, S. D., Mehta, S., Casalino, A., Côté, I., Kras-Dupuis, A., Moulin, D. E., et al. (2016). The CanPain SCI clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord: recommendations for treatment. Spinal Cord. 54, S14–S23. doi:10.1038/sc.2016.90
Hanley, M. A., Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., Lawrence, R. R., Cardenas, D. D., Turner, J. A., et al. (2006). Clinically significant change in pain intensity ratings in persons with spinal cord injury or amputation. Clin. J. Pain 22 (1), 25–31. doi:10.1097/01.ajp.0000148628.69627.82
Hatch, M. N., Timothy, R. C., Carlson, G. D., and Chang, E. Y. (2018). Neuropathic pain and SCI: identification and treatment strategies in the 21st century. J. Neurological Sci. 38, 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2017.11.018
Hawasli, A. H., Rutlin, J., Jarod, L. R., Murphy, R. K. J., Song, S-K., Leuthardt, E. C., et al. (2018). Spinal cord injury disrupts resting-state networks in the human brain. J. Neurotrauma 35 (6), 864–873. doi:10.1089/neu.2017.5212
Hearn, J. H., and Cross, A. (2020). Mindfulness for pain, depression, anxiety, and quality of life in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 20 (1), 32. doi:10.1186/s12883-020-1619-5
Huberty, J., Eckert, R., Gowin, K., Mitchell, J., Dueck, A. C., Ginos, B. F., et al. (2017). Feasibility study of online yoga for symptom management in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Haematologica 102 (10), e384–e388. doi:10.3324/haematol.2017.168583
Huynh, V., Rosner, J., Curt, A., Kollias, S., Hubli, M., and Michels, L. (2019). Disentangling the effects of spinal cord injury and related neuropathic pain on supraspinal neuroplasticity: a systematic review on neuroimaging. Front. Neurology 10, 1413. doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.01413
Impett, E. A., Daubenmier, J. J., and Hirschman, A. L. (2006). Minding the body: yoga, embodiment, and well-being. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy J. NSRC SR SP 3 (4), 39–48. doi:10.1525/srsp.2006.3.4.39
Jang, Y., Hsieh, C-L., Wang, Y-H., and Wu, Y-H. (2004). A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Archives Phys. Med. Rehabilitation 85 (11), 1890–1895. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.032
Jong, M. de, Lazar, S. W., Hug, K., Mehling, W. E., Hölzel, B. K., Sack, A. T., et al. (2016). Effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on body awareness in patients with chronic pain and comorbid depression. Front. Psychol. 7, 967. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00967
Kaur, J., Ghosh, S., Kumar Sahani, A., and Sinha, J. K. (2019). Mental imagery training for treatment of central neuropathic pain: a narrative review. Acta Neurol. Belg. 119 (2), 175–186. doi:10.1007/s13760-019-01139-x
Keeney, T., Slavin, M., Kisala, P., Ni, P., Heinemann, A. W., Charlifue, S., et al. (2018). Sensitivity of the SCI-FI/AT in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury. Archives Phys. Med. Rehabilitation 99 (9), 1783–1788. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.02.014
Kim, H. Y., Lee, H. J., Kim, T-L., Kim, E., Ham, D., Lee, J., et al. (2020). Prevalence and characteristics of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury referred to a rehabilitation center. Ann. Rehabilitation Med. 44 (6), 438–449. doi:10.5535/arm.20081
Kramer, J. L. K., Minhas, N. K., Jutzeler, C. R., Erin, L. K., Liu, L. J. W., and Ramer, M. S. (2017). Neuropathic pain following traumatic spinal cord injury: models, measurement, and mechanisms. J. Neurosci. Res. 95, 1295–1306. doi:10.1002/jnr.23881
Krassioukov, A., Biering-Sørensen, F., Donovan, W., Kennelly, M., Kirshblum, S., Krogh, K., et al. (2012). International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury. J. Spinal Cord Med. 35 (4), 201–210. doi:10.1179/1079026812Z.00000000053
Krause, J. S., Reed, K. S., and McArdle, J. J. (2010). Factor structure and predictive validity of somatic and nonsomatic symptoms from the patient health questionnaire-9: a longitudinal study after spinal cord injury. Archives Phys. Med. Rehabilitation 91, 1218–1224. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.015
Krause, J. S., Saunders, L. L., Reed, K. S., Coker, J., Zhai, Y., and Johnson, E. (2009). Comparison of the patient health questionnaire and the older adult health and mood questionnaire for self-reported depressive symptoms after spinal cord injury. Rehabil. Psychol. 54 (4), 440–448. doi:10.1037/a0017402
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., and Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. General Intern. Med. 16 (9), 606–613. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
Leemhuis, E., De Gennaro, L., and Pazzaglia, M. (2019). Disconnected body representation: neuroplasticity following spinal cord injury. J. Clin. Med. Res. 8 (12), 2144. doi:10.3390/jcm8122144
Leemhuis, E., Giuffrida, V., Giannini, A. M., and Pazzaglia, M. (2021). A therapeutic matrix: virtual reality as a clinical tool for spinal cord injury-induced neuropathic pain. Brain Sci. 11 (9), 1201. doi:10.3390/brainsci11091201
Leemhuis, E., Giuffrida, V., Luisa De Martino, M., Forte, G., Anna, P., De Gennaro, L., et al. (2022). Rethinking the body in the brain after spinal cord injury. J. Clin. Med. Res. 11 (2), 388. doi:10.3390/jcm11020388
Leitzelar, B. N., and Koltyn, K. F. (2021). Exercise and neuropathic pain: a general overview of preclinical and clinical research. Sports Med. - Open 7 (1), 21. doi:10.1186/s40798-021-00307-9
Lenggenhager, B., Pazzaglia, M., Scivoletto, G., Molinari, M., and Aglioti, S. M. (2012). The sense of the body in individuals with spinal cord injury. PloS One 7 (11), e50757. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050757
Madhusmita, M., Ebnezar, J., Srinivasan, T. M., Mohanty, P. P., Deepeshwar, S., and Pradhan, B. (2019). Efficacy of yoga as an add-on to physiotherapy in the management of patients with paraplegia: randomised controlled trial. J. Clin. Acad. Ophthalmol. 2019. doi:10.7860/jcdr/2019/40429.12724
Maggio, M. G., Naro, A., De Luca, R., Latella, D., Balletta, T., Caccamo, L., et al. (2022). Body representation in patients with severe spinal cord injury: a pilot study on the promising role of powered exoskeleton for gait training. J. Personalized Med. 12 (4), 619. doi:10.3390/jpm12040619
Malouin, F., Richards, C. L., Jackson, P. L., Lafleur, M. F., Durand, A., and Julien, D. (2007). The kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire (kviq) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J. Neurologic Phys. Ther. JNPT 31 (1), 20–29. doi:10.1097/01.npt.0000260567.24122.64
Mehling, W. E., Chesney, M. A., Metzler, T. J., Shira Maguen, L. A. G., Geronimo, C., Gary, A., et al. (2018). A 12-week integrative exercise program improves self-reported mindfulness and interoceptive awareness in war Veterans with posttraumatic stress symptoms. J. Clin. Psychol. 74, 554–565. doi:10.1002/jclp.22549
Mehling, W. E., Wrubel, J., Daubenmier, J. J., Price, C. J., Kerr, C. E., Silow, T., et al. (2011). Body awareness: a phenomenological inquiry into the common ground of mind-body therapies. Philosophy, Ethics, Humanit. Med. PEHM 6, 6. doi:10.1186/1747-5341-6-6
Mills, P. B., Vakil, A. P., Phillips, C., Lawrence, K., and Kwon, B. K. (2018). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the penn spasm frequency Scale in people with chronic traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 56 (6), 569–574. doi:10.1038/s41393-018-0063-5
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gøtzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., et al. (2010). CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 63, e1–e37. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004
Moro, V., Corbella, M., Ionta, S., Ferrari, F., and Scandola, M. (2021). Cognitive training improves disconnected limbs’ mental representation and peripersonal space after spinal cord injury. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (18), 9589. doi:10.3390/ijerph18189589
Moro, V., Scandola, M., and Aglioti, S. M. (2022). What the study of spinal cord injured patients can tell us about the significance of the body in cognition. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 29 (6), 2052–2069. doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02129-6
Naranjo, J., and Schmidt, S. (2012). Is it me or not me? Modulation of perceptual-motor awareness and visuomotor performance by mindfulness meditation. BMC Neurosci. 13, 88. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-88
National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (2022). Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance: 2022 SCI data sheet. Available at: https://msktc.org/sites/default/files/SCI-Facts-Figs-2022-Eng-508.pdf (Accessed June 7, 2022).
Osinski, T., Martinez, V., Bensmail, D., Hatem, S., and Bouhassira, D. (2020). Interplay between body schema, visuospatial perception and pain in patients with spinal cord injury. Eur. J. Pain 24 (7), 1400–1410. doi:10.1002/ejp.1600
Qi, Y., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., Xie, H., Shen, X., Niu, W., et al. (2018). The effect of wheelchair Tai Chi on balance control and quality of life among survivors of spinal cord injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Complementary Ther. Clin. Pract. 33, 7–11. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.07.004
Raja, S. N., Carr, D. B., Cohen, M., Finnerup, N. B., Flor, H., Gibson, S., et al. (2020). The revised international association for the study of pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 161 (9), 1976–1982. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939
Rounsaville, B. J., Carroll, K. M., and Onken, L. S. (2001). A stage model of behavioral therapies research: getting started and moving on from stage I. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 8 (2), 133–142. doi:10.1093/clipsy.8.2.133
Scandola, M., Aglioti, S. M., Pozeg, P., Avesani, R., and Moro, V. (2017). Motor imagery in spinal cord injured people is modulated by somatotopic coding, perspective taking, and post-lesional chronic pain. J. Neuropsychology 11, 305–326. doi:10.1111/jnp.12098
Schmalzl, L., Crane-Godreau, M. A., and Payne, P. (2014). Movement-based embodied contemplative practices: definitions and paradigms. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 205. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00205
Shem, K., Karasik, D., Paul, C., Kao, M-C., and Zheng, P. (2016). Seated Tai Chi to alleviate pain and improve quality of life in individuals with spinal cord disorder. J. Spinal Cord Med. 39 (3), 353–358. doi:10.1080/10790268.2016.1148895
Slavin, M. D., Ni, P., Tulsky, D. S., Pamela, A., Heinemann, A. W., Charlifue, S., et al. (2016). Spinal cord injury–functional index/assistive Technology short forms. Archives Phys. Med. Rehabilitation 97 (10), 1745–1752. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.029
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., and Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Spinal Cord Injury Statistics (2016). Brain and spinal cord. Available at: https://www.brainandspinalcord.org/spinal-cord-injury-statistics/ (Accessed April 12, 2016).
Spinal Cord Medicine (2011). Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. J. Spinal Cord Med. 34 (6), 620–621. doi:10.1179/204577211X13218754005537
R. C. Thames, and D. W. Webster (Editors) (2015). “Importance of mindset,” Chasing change (Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc).
Tsang, W. W. N., Gao, K. L., Chan, K. M., Purves, S., Macfarlane, D. J., and Fong, S. S. M. (2015). Sitting Tai Chi improves the balance control and muscle strength of community-dwelling persons with spinal cord injuries: a pilot study. Evidence-Based Complementary Altern. Med. eCAM 2015, 523852. doi:10.1155/2015/523852
Van de Winckel, A., Carpentier, S., Deng, W., Zhang, L., Battaglino, R., and Morse, L. (2023a). Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: protocol of a quasi-experimental feasibility clinical trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 9, 145. doi:10.1186/s40814-023-01374-3
Van de Winckel, A., Carpentier, S. T., Deng, W., Bottale, S., Zhang, L., Hendrickson, T., et al. (2023b). Identifying body awareness-related brain network changes after cognitive multisensory rehabilitation for neuropathic pain relief in adults with spinal cord injury: delayed treatment arm phase I randomized controlled trial. medRxiv 23285713. doi:10.1101/2023.02.09.23285713
Vastano, R., Costantini, M., and Widerstrom-Noga, E. (2022). Maladaptive reorganization following SCI: the role of body representation and multisensory integration. Prog. Neurobiol. 208, 102179. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102179
Vastano, R., and Widerstrom-Noga, E. (2023). Event-related potentials during mental rotation of body-related stimuli in spinal cord injury population. Neuropsychologia 179, 108447. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108447
Vázquez-Fariñas, M., and Rodríguez-Martin, B. (2021). ‘Living with a fragmented body’: a qualitative study on perceptions about body changes after a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 59 (8), 855–864. doi:10.1038/s41393-021-00634-4
Velasco-Mondragon, E., Jimenez, A., AnnaDavis, G. D., Jose, A., and Escamilla-Cejudo, J. A. (2016). Hispanic health in the USA: a scoping review of the literature. Public Health Rev. 37, 31. doi:10.1186/s40985-016-0043-2
Westaway, M. D., Stratford, P. W., and Binkley, J. M. (1998). The patient-specific functional Scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 27 (5), 331–338. doi:10.2519/jospt.1998.27.5.331
Widerström-Noga, E., Biering-Sørensen, F., Bryce, T. N., Cardenas, D. D., Finnerup, N. B., Jensen, M. P., et al. (2014). The international spinal cord injury pain basic data set (version 2.0). Spinal Cord. 52 (4), 282–286. doi:10.1038/sc.2014.4
Williamson, A., and Hoggart, B. (2005). Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J. Clin. Nurs. 14 (7), 798–804. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x
Winckers, A. N. E., Mackenbach, J. D., Compernolle, S., Nicolaou, M., Hiddevan der Ploeg, P., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., et al. (2015). Educational differences in the validity of self-reported physical activity. BMC Public Health 15, 1299. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2656-7
WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (2021). WMA declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human Subjects. Available at: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ (Accessed November 15, 2021).
Keywords: spinal cord injury, neuropathic pain, body awareness, autonomic function, Qigong, spasm, mood
Citation: Van de Winckel A, Carpentier ST, Deng W, Zhang L, Philippus A, Battaglino R and Morse LR (2023) Feasibility of using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Front. Physiol. 14:1222616. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1222616
Received: 23 May 2023; Accepted: 10 August 2023;
Published: 31 August 2023.
Edited by:
Guodong Zhang, Southwest University, ChinaReviewed by:
Huilin Wang, Hunan University of Science and Technology, ChinaYang Cao, Örebro University, Sweden
Copyright © 2023 Van de Winckel, Carpentier, Deng, Zhang, Philippus, Battaglino and Morse. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ann Van de Winckel, avandewi@umn.edu