AUTHOR=Omi Maiko , Koneru Tejaswi , Lyu Yishan , Haraguchi Ai , Kamiya Nobuhiro , Mishina Yuji 

TITLE=Increased BMP-Smad signaling does not affect net bone mass in long bones

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Physiology

VOLUME=14

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1145763

DOI=10.3389/fphys.2023.1145763

ISSN=1664-042X

ABSTRACT=<p>Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been used for orthopedic and dental application due to their osteoinductive properties; however, substantial numbers of adverse reactions such as heterotopic bone formation, increased bone resorption and greater cancer risk have been reported. Since bone morphogenetic proteins signaling exerts pleiotropic effects on various tissues, it is crucial to understand tissue-specific and context-dependent functions of bone morphogenetic proteins. We previously reported that loss-of-function of bone morphogenetic proteins receptor type IA (BMPR1A) in osteoblasts leads to more bone mass in mice partly due to inhibition of bone resorption, indicating that bone morphogenetic protein signaling in osteoblasts promotes osteoclast function. On the other hand, hemizygous constitutively active (ca) mutations for BMPR1A (<italic>caBmpr1a</italic><sup><italic>wt/+</italic></sup>) in osteoblasts result in higher bone morphogenetic protein signaling activity and no overt skeletal changes in adult mice. Here, we further bred mice for heterozygous null for <italic>Bmpr1a (Bmpr1a</italic><sup><italic>+/−</italic></sup>) and homozygous mutations of <italic>caBmpr1a</italic> (<italic>caBmpr1a</italic><sup><italic>+/+</italic></sup>) crossed with <italic>Osterix</italic>-Cre transgenic mice to understand how differences in the levels of bone morphogenetic protein signaling activity specifically in osteoblasts contribute to bone phenotype. We found that <italic>Bmpr1a</italic><sup><italic>+/−</italic></sup>, <italic>caBmpr1a</italic><sup><italic>wt/+</italic></sup> and <italic>caBmpr1a</italic><sup><italic>+/+</italic></sup> mice at 3 months of age showed no overt bone phenotypes in tibiae compared to controls by micro-CT and histological analysis although BMP-Smad signaling is increased in both <italic>caBmpr1a</italic><sup><italic>wt/+</italic></sup> and <italic>caBmpr1a</italic><sup><italic>+/+</italic></sup> tibiae and decreased in the <italic>Bmpr1a</italic><sup><italic>+/−</italic></sup> mice compared to controls. Gene expression analysis demonstrated that slightly higher levels of bone formation markers and resorption markers along with levels of bone morphogenetic protein-Smad signaling, however, there was no significant changes in TRAP positive cells in tibiae. These findings suggest that changes in bone morphogenetic protein signaling activity within differentiating osteoblasts does not affect net bone mass in the adult stage, providing insights into the concerns in the clinical setting such as high-dose and unexpected side effects of bone morphogenetic protein application.</p>